Approximately 700,000 tonnes of D-sorbitol are synthesized each year worldwide by the catalytic hydrogenation of D-glucose, which represents an inexpensive, abundant feedstock obtainable from renewable resources such as starch- containing crops or cellulose [1, 2, 3, 4]. D-sorbitol has many applications in the food, pharmaceutical, cosmetic and paper industries, and it can also be used as a building block in the synthesis of various fine chemicals, including vitamin C [5, 6, 7].
Most of the industrial processes for the synthesis of this compound are based on the batch-wise hydrogenation of D-glucose to D-sorbitol over Raney Ni catalysts, promoted by various transition metals [8]. Although Raney Ni has several advantages, such as low cost, excellent setting and high activity, the risk of leaching of the Ni or of the metal promoter reduces the economic benefits of the process [9]. The more stable supported Ru catalysts have demonstrated good activity and excellent selectivity during the hydrogenation of sugars, but have the drawback of high cost. To reduce this cost, Ru nanoparticles have been dispersed on different solid supports, including silica [10, 11], multi-wall carbon nanotubes [12], activated carbons [13, 14], alumina oxides [15, 16, 17], and some synthetic materials such as synthetic zeolites [18], which have also been studied for the dehydration of D-glucose. However, these catalysts are typically prepared using conventional methods such as impregnation followed by H2 reduction. These supported catalysts also suffer from the disadvantage of rapid deactivation, likely resulting from the relatively weak interaction between the metal and the support as well as the limited diffusion of reactants/products within the support materials [19], leading to aggregation/sintering and leaching of Ru particles during use [20]. In addition, there is no way to precisely control the size and location of metal particles on the solid supports through the conventional synthetic approaches [21].
ZSM-5 zeolites with appropriate acidity and good shape- selectivity are widely used as supports in hydrogenation reactions [22]. Recently, more direct, template-free syntheses of Ru-containing ZSM-5 composites have been described [23, 24, 25], which provide control over both the texture and Si/Al ratio without any requirement for additives. RuO2 clusters of uniform size (ca. 1 nm) have been deposited predominantly in MFI (ZSM-5) channels during hydrothermal synthesis and subsequently exhibit high reactivity for 1-hexene hydrogenation after reduction [26]. More importantly, encapsulation of metal or oxide clusters within zeolites can protect such clusters against sintering and also reduce their contact with toxic impurities, while concurrently allowing the active sites to select reactants and transition states on the basis of molecular size [25].
To date, the fabrication of highly dispersed metal nanoparticles within molecular sieve materials with tunable pore-sizes, and their subsequent use as catalysts for the hydrogenation of sugar alcohols, has not been reported in the literature. In the work reported herein, uniform Ru nanoparticles with an average diameter of less than 1 nm and encapsulated in ZSM-5 were prepared by a one-step, template-free method using RuCl3 as the Ru precursor. The preparation method was simple and fast and allowed the prepared Ru clusters to be finely dispersed in the ZSM-5 support. We report herein that the materials prepared in this manner resulted in significant improvements in the D-sorbitol yields during the hydrogenation of D-glucose.
Ru/C (5 wt%) was purchased from Aladdin Reagent Co., Ltd., while RuCl3·xH2O (AR, 37.5 wt% Ru), NaOH (AR, 96 wt%), NaAlO2 (54 wt% Al2O3, 41 wt% Na2O, 5 wt% H2O), D-glucose and D-sorbitol were purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). The colloidal silica sol Ludox HS-40 (40 wt% in water, average particle size ~ 12 nm) was purchased from Aldrich. Commercially available ZSM-5 (Si/Al = 38) was acquired from the Catalyst Plant of Nankai University and was dried at 120 °C for 24 h before use.
The incorporation of the Ru was realized by two different methods: an impregnation process and an in situ one-step process. In the first method, MFI-type zeolites were synthesized by a modified version of Weitkamp’s method [24], with the molar composition nRuO2:nSiO2:nAl2O3:nNa2O:nH2O = 0.65~2.81:38: 1:11.5:2800. A solution of 2.35 g NaOH and 0.7112 g sodium aluminate in 90 g H2O was added to 21.71 g Ludox HS-40 with stirring, after which 25 mL of a solution containing the desired amount of RuCl3·xH2O was added to the initial mixture. This combined mixture was then stirred at 50 °C for 3 h followed by crystallization in a rotating stainless-steel autoclave (100 cm3) for 4 d at 160 °C. Upon completion, the template-free zeolite Ru/ZSM-5-TF was obtained.
ZSM-5 with framework Si/Al ratios in the range of 25-50 has been shown to be an eligible structure for the introduction of mesoporosity via desilication. In this work, alkali-treated ZSM-5 samples (Si/Al = 38), denoted as ZSM-5-AT, were fabricated by immersing the zeolite in a 0.3 mol/L NaOH solution at 65 °C for 120 min. The treated samples were subsequently filtered, washed with distilled water, dried at 80 °C, ion- exchanged with NH4NO3 solution (0.1 mol/L) three times and finally calcined in static air at 550 °C for 4 h at a heating rate of 1 °C/min.
For comparison purposes, Ru/ZSM-5 catalysts were also prepared by the incipient wetness impregnation method at ambient temperature, employing an aqueous RuCl3 solution as the Ru precursor. The preparation procedure associated with the impregnation method involved impregnating the dry supports (commercial microporous ZSM-5 zeolites with Si/Al = 38, denoted as ZSM-5-MS, and mesoporous ZSM-5 created by desilication in alkaline medium, denoted as ZSM-5-AT) with an aqueous solution of RuCl3. To achieve incipient wetness, a liquid (RuCl3/H2O solution of 20.1 mg/mL) to solid ratio of 2.0 mL/g was used. Following impregnation and subsequent ultrasonic treatment (600 W) for 2 h, the mixture was continuously stirred under ambient conditions to allow slow evaporation of water. The samples were then dried overnight at 110 °C, followed by reduction in H2 at 350 °C for 3 h. The obtained sample was designated as Ru/ZSM-5-MS and Ru/ZSM-5-AT.
The X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) patterns of catalysts were obtained with a Bruker D8 Advance X-ray diffraction instrument, using Ni-filtered Cu-Kα radiation. N2 adsorption- desorption experiments were performed with a Micromeritics ASAP 2020 surface area and porosity analyzer and ICP analyses were carried out on a Thermo IRIS Intrepid II XSP atomic emission spectrometer to determine the chemical composition of catalysts and to examine metal leaching during reactions. NH3 temperature-programmed desorption (NH3-TPD), CO2 temperature-programmed desorption (CO2-TPD) and H2 temperature-programmed reduction (H2-TPR) data were acquired using a Micromeritics Autochem II chemisorption analyzer. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images were taken using a field emission H-7600 electron microscope at 120 kV, while scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis was conducted on a Hitachi S-4800 electron microscope working at 200 kV.
The hydrogenation of D-glucose was performed in a 100-mL stainless autoclave. Following the loading of the autoclave with 0.5 g of catalyst and 50 mL of a 25 wt% D-glucose solution, the reactor was purged with hydrogen four times to remove air, then operated at the desired pressure and temperature for a predefined span of time with stirring at 500 r/min. The product distribution following reaction was analyzed by high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) with refractive index (RI) detection (column: Aminex HPX-87C at 70 °C, mobile phase: 0.006 mol/L sulfuric acid at 0.5 mL/min).
Figure 1 presents the XRD patterns of ruthenium-containing MFI-type zeolites, including the Ru/ZSM-5-TF, Ru/ZSM-5-MS and Ru/ZSM-5-AT catalysts. All ZSM-5 samples showed well-resolved diffraction peaks at 2θ = 8°-9°, 23°-25°, and 45°, all of which are characteristic of the MFI-type structure [27]. In the case of the Ru/ZSM-5-TF catalyst, no reflections due to metallic Ru, RuOx or any other crystalline phases were present, indicating that the Ru species prepared by the one-step method were amorphous or had a particle size of 1 nm or less [28]. However, in the patterns obtained for the Ru/ZSM-5-AT and Ru/ZSM-5-MS materials, signals were observed at 2θ = 38.3° and 44.0° along with an additional weak reflection at 58.3°. These reflections could be assigned to the (100), (101), and (102) diffraction planes of bulk hexagonal Ru metal (JCPDS-ICDD card No. 06-0663) and may be due to the presence of a few large Ru particles forming on the external surfaces of the catalysts.
The N2 adsorption data obtained for the various Ru/ZSM-5 samples are presented in Table 1, and the N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms and pore size distribution (PSD) curves for the catalysts are shown in Fig. 2. The isotherms of Ru/ZSM-5-TF and Ru/ZSM-5-MS both exhibited very high adsorption below p/p0 = 0.1, implying a large micropore volume, and showed a type I isotherm [29, 30]. The BET surface area and total pore volume of the Ru/ZSM-MS were 339 m2/g and 0.23 cm3/g, respectively. Ru/ZSM-5-AT generated an isotherm representing both types I and IV behaviors, with a remarkably enhanced uptake of nitrogen at higher pressures. This suggested the presence of both micro and mesoporosity, which was supported by the t-plot results shown in Table 1. The BET surface area and mesoporous volume for Ru/ZSM-5-AT were 345 m2/g and 0.32 cm3/g, respectively, suggesting that larger mesopores were present in the desilication products, compared with Ru/ZSM-5-TF. It was clear that the micropore volume (Vmicro) of the Ru/ZSM-5-MS catalyst was twice that of the Ru/ZSM-5-AT catalyst.
Figure 3(a) provides the NH3-TPD profiles for Ru/ZSM-5 samples. The acid amount and strength were essentially unchanged by the acid treatment, indicating that the application of different treatment methods did not affect the acidic character of the catalyst. In contrast, considerable changes were observed in the basicity, as measured by CO2-TPD (Fig. 3(b)). Large CO2 desorption peaks were observed for the Ru/ZSM-5-TF catalysts, while in the case of the Ru/ZSM-5-AT, the CO2 adsorption decreased in comparison with Ru/ZSM-5-TF, and no peak was observed for Ru/ZSM-5-MS, indicating the presence of weak basic sites.
A rather dramatic change in the morphology of Ru/ZSM-5 was found to correlate with the use of different preparation methods. Typical SEM images of Ru/ZSM-5-TF revealed similar void spaces only in rare instances. Instead, these particles exhibited surfaces with small bumps (Fig. 4(a)). Ru particles with diameters between 0.5 and 0.9 nm were homogeneously distributed over the catalyst (Fig. 4(d)). In contrast, the SEM images of ZSM-5-AT shown in Fig. 4(b) show that some cracks and faults appeared on the surface of ZSM-5 particles after alkali treatment for 120 min in a NaOH solution (0.3 mol/L). To elucidate internal changes in particle morphology, the alkali-treated ZSM-5 was examined by TEM, as shown in Fig. 4(e). Mesopores throughout the particles were clearly observed on the sample, and the edges appeared to be deformed. In the case of Ru/ZSM-5-MS, however, its TEM image (Fig. 4(f)) showed rather inhomogeneous Ru distribution and large particle sizes up to 3.0 nm in diameter. Therefore, a large fraction of the Ru particles must be located on the outer surfaces of the ZSM-5 crystals.
As discussed, catalysts based on Ru have potential for the hydrogenation of D-glucose, and the results obtained during the catalytic D-glucose hydrogenation using different types of Ru/ZSM-5 catalysts were studied and summarized in detail in Table 2. Almost none of the target product D-sorbitol was observed when applying the ZSM-5 at 120 °C in the absence of Ru. Among the catalysts investigated, the Ru/ZSM-5-TF catalysts were observed to function more effectively and selectively when producing D-sorbitol, giving markedly higher yields of D-sorbitol compared with other catalysts such as Ru/ZSM-5-MS and Ru/ZSM-5-AT. However, the sorbitol selectivity was only 61.7% on Ru/C, and this relatively low catalytic activity may be due to the lower dispersion of Ru on Ru/C in comparison with that on ZSM-5-TF. Based on the above analysis, ZSM-5-TF was the best support for the Ru catalyst in the selective hydrogenation of D-glucose to D-sorbitol.
As shown by the TEM images, the template-free fabrication produces highly dispersed and isolated Ru species within Ru/ZSM-5-TF. The small clusters were uniform in size and homogeneously distributed throughout the zeolite materials, as shown in Fig. 4. Both Ru/ZSM-5-MS and Ru/ZSM-5-AT, however, exhibited aggregated Ru nanoparticles with larger particle sizes in the zeolite nanocrystals. This suggested that the template-free method represents a very promising route to overcome problems with particle aggregation and also that highly dispersed Ru centers result in much higher activity for D-glucose hydrogenation than larger Ru particles.
The observed high performance of the Ru/ZSM-5 catalyst can be explained in terms of bifunctional catalysis, since this system possesses both acidic (the support) and basic (the metal) sites on the surface. The saccharide molecule adsorbs on the acidic sites of ZSM-5 through its C=O bond, which can work in tandem with the dissociative adsorption of hydrogen at the basic sites. As indicated by the NH3-TPD test (Fig. 3(a)), the performances of the supported Ru catalysts under the investigated conditions was not directly linked to their apparent acidity. Therefore, the basicities of different Ru/ZSM-5 samples were measured by the CO2-TPD method. As can be seen from Fig. 3(b), two peaks were observed in all samples, one of which was positioned at about 227 °C and the other at approximately 477 °C. In the case of Ru/ZSM-5-AT and Ru/ZSM-5-MS, both peaks were shifted to lower temperatures, indicating a decrease in the strength of the basic sites, which could lead to less hydrogen dissociative production at these sites [31]. These results indicated that the basic sites on Ru centers seemed to be critical for the activity and selectivity of the Ru/ZSM-5 catalysts.
Based on the above discussion, we conclude that it is possible to increase the activity and selectivity of the catalysts during D-glucose hydrogenation through modifications of the structure, Ru dispersity and acid-base properties of the Ru/ZSM-5. The mesopore structure of Ru/ZSM-5-AT produced by desilication in NaOH led to no significant improvement in product yields. Interestingly, the Ru/ZSM-5-TF synthesized using a template-free method represents a potentially suitable candidate for D-glucose hydrogenation catalytic applications.
The effects of reaction temperature on the hydrogenation were also examined, with Ru-ZSM-5-TF as the catalyst (Table 2) in the range from 70 to 130 °C. Hydrogenation of D-glucose was found to be quite temperature sensitive, such that high reaction temperatures improved both the D-glucose conversion and the D-sorbitol selectivity. It can be seen that the conversion of D-glucose increased continuously, from 62.3% to 99.6%, while the yield of D-sorbitol increased from 21.8% to 99.2% as the temperature was increased from 70 to 120 °C. However, when the temperature was elevated to 130 °C, the selectivity for D-sorbitol decreased to 97.0%, possibly due to the formation of by-products such as D-fructose. D-fructose could also be subsequently hydrogenated into D-sorbitol, D-mannitol, D-mannose and other degradation products [16, 32]. These results demonstrated that the optimal reaction temperature for the D-glucose hydrogenation was 120 °C, since higher temperature may promote competitive side-reactions and speed up the loss of active components.
To maximize the catalytic activity of the Ru catalyst, the effect of metal loading was investigated over medium-pore, Ru-containing ZSM-5 catalysts during the hydrogenation reaction of D-glucose. It can be observed from Fig. 5 that the mean catalytic activity increased with increasing Ru loading up to 4.1 wt%, and then slightly decreased with further addition of Ru. More importantly, the formation of undesirable by-products, i.e. D-fructose and D-mannitol, was significantly minimized with increasing metal loading. For example, D-glucose conversion below 61.8% and 15.9% D-sorbitol selectivity were obtained when the content of Ru was 1.2 wt% at 120 °C. By increasing the Ru loading to 4.1 wt%, the D-glucose conversion and the D-sorbitol selectivity were improved to 99.6% and 99.2%, respectively.
It should be noted that the dispersion of Ru on the Ru/ZSM-5-TF catalysts was slightly changed and the mean crystallite size of Ru varied between 0.5 and 0.9 nm when increasing the metal loading from 1.0 to 4.1 wt%, as shown in Fig. 4. Also, particles over 1 nm in size were seen at a Ru loading of 5 wt%, indicating that large nanoparticle clusters were formed predominantly on the external surfaces of ZSM-5 materials when the Ru loading was increased up to 5 wt%. Accordingly, the interaction of Ru with the support was weakened, accompanied by a decline in the hydrogenation activity. Therefore, Ru levels below 4.1 wt% are beneficial with regard to the hydrogenation activity, as a result of the good dispersion of Ru nanoparticles and the increased number of active sites.
Recycling of the Ru/ZSM-5-TF catalyst was also investigated during the hydrogenation of D-glucose. It was found that the entire system could be reused successively for five trials under the same reaction conditions without the requirement to add any additional catalyst. After each reaction run, the Ru/ZSM-5 was recycled, dried at 120 °C in air and regenerated without further treatment. During this series of trials, the reaction conditions were held constant. As observed in Fig. 6, Ru/ZSM-5-TF clearly showed higher glucose conversion and sorbitol selectivity during all the runs compared with the Ru/ZSM-5-AT and Ru/ZSM-5-MS catalysts and could be reused with little loss of catalytic activity and selectivity after five recycling trials. This is also supported by the observation that the reaction liquid remained colorless after filtration of the catalyst and that almost no leaching of Ru particles was detected by ICP after five runs. Moreover, no aggregation of Ru nanoparticles was detected from the TEM images (Fig. 7(a)). The decrease in glucose conversion from 99.7% to 89.2% after the fifth run is due to the regeneration method employed. When Ru/ZSM-5-TF was only dried at 120 °C in air, and reused without further treatment, the sorbitol yield decreased to 89.2% after five runs. However, when the spent catalyst was washed with water and subsequently washed with ethanol or acetone three times each, there was no obvious loss of the catalytic reactivity. The deactivation therefore may be caused by the accumulation of organic and inorganic species adsorbed on the surface of the catalyst. These results clearly showed that Ru/ZSM-5-TF was effective for the hydrogenation of D-glucose and had good stability during the reaction process.
In contrast, the D-sorbitol yields over Ru/ZSM-5-MS and Ru/ZSM-5-AT dropped to 45% and 38% by the fifth use, respectively. The observed quick deactivation of these catalysts could be attributed to the weak interactions between ruthenium and the supports, which enabled particle aggregation/sintering and leaching during use [20]. The levels of leached ruthenium in the reaction solutions, as determined by ICP-OES, were 0.53-0.61 ppm when Ru/ZSM-5-MS or Ru/ZSM-5-AT were used as catalysts. In addition, it is challenging to precisely control the size and location of the metal particles on the solid support through conventional impregnation approaches (Fig. 7(b) and (c)). In summary, the medium-pore Ru/ZSM-5 prepared by the one-step method has been shown to be an efficient catalyst for hydrogenation of D-glucose, as a result of the improved zeolite structure and good dispersion of the metallic Ru throughout the ZSM-5.
Ru/ZSM-5-TF were successfully synthesized from a template-free gel using a hydrothermal ZSM-5 method. The Ru species in the zeolite prepared were too small to be detected by XRD, indicating the presence of Ru clusters with sizes of 1 nm or less. Ru/ZSM-5-TF was highly active and selective during the hydrogenation of D-glucose to D-sorbitol and over 99% conversion of D-glucose and selectivity for D-sorbitol were achieved. The preparation method had significant effects on the catalytic performance as a result of influencing the structure of the support and/or the electronic state and particle size of the ruthenium. Ru/ZSM-5-TF showed higher activity and selectivity than Ru/ZSM-5-MS and Ru/ZSM-5-AT. In addition, Ru/ZSM-5-TF was a more stable heterogeneous catalyst and could be recycled with simple regeneration.