催化学报  2014, Vol. 35 Issue (11): 1883-1891   PDF (588 KB)    
扩展功能
加入收藏夹
复制引文信息
加入引用管理器
Email Alert
RSS
本文作者相关文章
任成军
周丽娜
尚鸿燕
陈耀强
Effect of preparation method on the performance of Pd-MnOx/γ-Al2O3 monolithic catalysts for ground-level O3 decomposition
Chengjun Ren, Lina Zhou, Hongyan Shang, Yaoqiang Chen     
Key Laboratory of Green Chemistry & Technology of the Ministry of Education, College of Chemistry, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610064, Sichuan China
Abstract: MnOx +γ-Al2O3 and MnOx/γ-Al2O3 catalysts were prepared by the sol-gel and sequential precipitation methods, respectively. The same amount of Pd was loaded on these catalysts by incipient wetness impregnation. The two Pd-MnOx/γ-Al2O3 catalysts with different physicochemical properties were coated on cordierite. The catalysts were characterized by X-ray diffraction, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, H2 temperature-programmed reduction, and N2 adsorption-desorption measurement. The preparation method and calcination temperature of MnOx have significant impact on the crystalline phase of MnOx, MnOx species and active oxygen species, and textural properties of the catalysts. The experimental results showed that 0.60 μL·L-1 of ozone was completely decomposed on these catalysts in the temperature range of 16 to 90 ℃ at space velocities from 380000 to 580000 h-1. In particular, the activity for O3 decomposition was excellent on the Pd/MnOx+Pd/γ-Al2O3 catalyst that used MnOx prepared by the sol-gel method. Mnn+ is beneficial for O3 decomposition, and Mn2+, Mn3+, and Mn4+ were presented in a mole ratio of 1.7:1:3 on the surface of the catalyst.
© 2014, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Key words: Manganese oxide     Palladium     Ozone     Catalytic decomposition     Preparation method    
制备方法对Pd-MnOx/γ-Al2O3催化剂分解地表O3性能的影响
任成军, 周丽娜, 尚鸿燕, 陈耀强     
四川大学化学学院, 教育部绿色化学重点实验室, 四川成都610064
摘要:分别用溶胶凝胶法和分步沉淀法制备了MnOx + γ-Al2O3和MnOx/γ-Al2O3, 用等体积浸渍法将等量的Pd(NO3)2分别浸渍于其上, 再将它们分别涂覆于堇青石上, 得到不同物理化学性质的整体式催化剂, 并采用X射线衍射、X射线光电子能谱、程序升温还原和低温N2吸附-脱附等技术对催化剂进行表征. 结果表明, 制备方法和MnOx焙烧温度明显影响催化剂中MnOx的物相、表面Mn物种和表面活性氧物种的分布及织构性质. 活性测试结果表明, 两种制备方法得到的催化剂于16-90 ℃, 380000-580000 h-1条件下均可将0.6 μL·L-1 O3完全分解; 尤其是溶胶凝胶法制备的Pd/γ-Al2O3+MnOx/γ-Al2O3催化剂分解O3活性较好, 催化剂表面Mn2+:Mn3+:Mn4+ = 1.7:1:3 (mol).
关键词锰氧化物          臭氧     催化分解     制备方法    

1. Introduction

Ground-level O3 is formed from reactions under ultraviolet light between VOCs and nitrogen oxides (NOx) released from automobile exhaust gas and power plants [1, 2, 3]. Modern office equipments such as photocopier machines, laser printers, and air conditioners also produce O3. These break the tropospheric ozone cycle equilibrium and result in the increase of O3 concentration and the variation of ground-level temperature [4, 5]. O3 is highly injurious. 0.1 µL∙L-1 O3 causes severe health problems like headaches, respiratory illness, throat irritation and damage to mucous membranes [6] to humans, and increases cardiovascular mortality [7]. Photochemical smog aerosol formed by O3 is atmospheric pollution and the resulting low visibility result in an increase in traffic accidents. Woody plants including arbor and shrubs are subjected to damage by ambient O3 [8]. The typical symptoms of foliar injury are dark stipple, mottling and tip burn. O3 is also an important air pollution in Europe and North America [9].

According to Occupational Safety and Health Administration regulations, the threshold level for allowable exposure is 0.1 µL∙L-1 during a 8 h period [10]. The allowable concentration in the working environment is 0.1 µL∙L-1 in Japan [11]. In March 2012, the State Environmental Protection Administration of China promulgated the ambient air quality standard regulation GB3095-2012 that the O3 average concentration must be lower than 0.046-0.075 µL∙L-1 in 8 h, and it will be enforced in January 2016. Therefore, the catalytic decomposition of ground- level O3 is an important area of research from the point of view of environment and health. It is necessary and urgent that high activity catalysts are found for ozone abatement [12, 13].

Challapalli et al. [14] investigated the catalytic decomposition of O3 over activated carbons (AC). A ‘‘high activity’’ for O3 decomposition was observed, which was mainly due to the chemical interaction of O3 with activated carbon. This interaction resulted in the formation of oxygen-containing surface groups on the activated carbon until saturation. Then, the conversion sharply decreased and the AC gave ‘‘low activity’’. The catalytic decomposition of O3 was not steady over the activated carbon. Zhang et al. [15] reported that the surface carbon of the Au/AC catalyst was partly oxidized after O3 decomposition. Some researchers found that MnO2 was the most active among the transition metal oxides for O3 decomposition [10, 16, 17]. Dhandapani et al. [10] showed by temperature-programmed reduction (TPR) that MnO2 was more reducible than the other oxides. Kameya et al. [18] studied MnO2 impregnated Pd for the decomposition of O3 in high humidity. The activity of the catalyst was higher than other existing catalysts. Wu et al. [19] showed that a Pd catalyst demonstrated not only the highest O3 conversion efficiency among the catalysts tested (Pt, Pd, Pd/Ni, and Ni), but also it had strong resistance to water vapor, which inhibited O3 decomposition reaction at low temperatures. In addition, Zhou et al. [12] observed that a synergetic effect took place between Pd and MnOx when O3 was decomposed on the surface of Pd/MnOx + Pd/γ-Al2O3catalysts. Pd was both resistant to humidity and an active species.

Pd/MnOx catalysts were investigated in our group in recent years [12, 20, 21], where it was shown that 0.6 µL∙L-1 of O3 was completely decomposed at ambient temperature over these catalysts. MnCO3 was calcined and decomposed to MnOx (x = 0.16-2), and then transformed to Mn2O3 with increasing calcination temperature [20]. The results showed that mixed phases of MnCO3 and MnOx had better catalytic activity. Pan et al. [21] showed that MnOx was prepared by a chemical reaction of Mn(NO3)2 and urea. The MnCO3 intermediate was gradually transformed to MnO2 and Mn2O3 with the increase of calcination temperature. They displayed that mixed phases of MnO2 and Mn2O3 have better catalytic activity. The investigations of Yu et al. [20] and Pan et al. [21] revealed that mixed phases of MnOx had better activity. Zhou et al. [12] confirmed that the activity of mixed phases of a MnOx catalyst was better than that of a MnO2 catalyst. Although the prepared catalysts contained Pd, we focused on discussing the MnOx active species in this paper. The MnOx was prepared by the sol-gel and sequential precipitation methods. The aim was to study the effect of the preparation method and calcination temperature on the phase of MnOx, and the specific surface area and electronic characteristics of the surface of the catalysts and their catalytic activity.

2. Experimental
2.1. Preparation of catalysts

The preparation of γ-Al2O3 was given in Ref. [12].

Manganese acetate (West Sichuan Chemical Company, AR) and citric acid (Chongqing Oriental Reagent Factory, AR) were mixed in a molar ratio of 1:1 and the solution was adjusted to pH 8.5 by NH3·H2O under vigorous stirring at 70 °C to form a sol. The sol was kept overnight and then heated at 70 °C for 3 h in a water bath to eliminate the solvent. The resulting viscous gel was dried at 110 °C for 12 h, then crushed into a fine powder. The dried powder was divided into four parts which were heated in a muffle furnace for 4 h at 300, 400, 500, and 600 °C, respectively. The MnOx samples were obtained. In addition, a mixture of the MnOx and γ-Al2O3 in a mass ratio of 4:1 was ball-milled with distilled water, and then was dried at 110 °C for 6 h to prepare the MnOx + γ-Al2O3.

An aqueous solution of Al(NO3)3 (Chongqing Southern China inorganic reagent factory, AR) was adjusted to pH 9 by NH3·H2O with vigorous agitation. An Al(OH)3 precipitate was formed. Then 50% Mn(NO3)2 and NH3·H2O were added dropwise into the Al(OH)3 precipitate at pH 9 under vigorous stirring. The final precipitate was aged at 70 °C for 3 h, filtered off, washed with distill water, and dried at 110 °C for 12 h. After that, the dried powder was divided into four parts and calcined for 6h at 300, 400, 500, and 600 °C, respectively. MnOx/γ-Al2O3 powder containing MnOx 80% and γ-Al2O3 20% was obtained.

The Pd catalysts were prepared by wet impregnation. The loading of Pd was 1.6 wt% for all of the samples. (1). An amount of an aqueous solution of Pd(NO3)2 (Chengdu Guangming Equipment Company, AR) was impregnated in the MnOx prepared by the sol-gel method and γ-Al2O3 in a mass ratio of 4:1. Then, the Pd/MnOx and Pd/γ-Al2O3 powder catalysts were mixed together. (2). An amount of an aqueous solution of Pd(NO3)2 was impregnated in the MnOx/γ-Al2O3 prepared by the sequential precipitation method. (3). An amount of an aqueous solution of Pd(NO3)2 was impregnated in γ-Al2O3. After impregnation, the Pd/MnOx+Pd/γ-Al2O3, Pd/MnOx/γ-Al2O3, and Pd/γ-Al2O3 catalysts were dried at 120 °C overnight, and then calcined at 200 °C for 3 h in air.

The above powder was ball-milled with distilled water to form a slurry. The slurry was coated onto a cordierite substrate of 0.28 cm3 (Coring Corporation in American, 400 pore·inch-2, diameter 5 mm, length 14 mm) and excess slurry was blown off. The catalyst was dried at 110 °C overnight and calcined at 200 °C for 3 h in air to obtain the Pd/MnOx+Pd/γ-Al2O3, Pd/MnOx/γ-Al2O3, MnOx+γ-Al2O3, MnOx/γ-Al2O3, and Pd/γ-Al2O3 catalysts. The loading of catalyst on the cordierite substrate was 350 g·L-1.

2.2. Catalyst characterization

H2-TPR was carried out using an automated instrument. In a typical experiment, 100 mg of sample was loaded in a U-shaped quartz microreactor. The sample was heated from room temperature to 550 °C at a heating rate 10 °C·min-1 in a flowing 5%H2/N2 mixture gas (30 cm3·min-1). Hydrogen consumption was monitored using a thermal conductivity detector. The XRD analysis was conducted on DX-1000 X-ray diffractometer using Cu Kα radiation (λ = 0.15406 nm) at 40 kV and 25 mA. The X-ray diffraction (XRD) data were recorded for 2θ values from 10° to 80° at a scan 0.05°/s. X-ray photoelectron spectra (XPS) of the samples were acquired at room temperature using a Vacuum Generator Scientific XSAM800 system (Kratos Co., UK). The spectra were recorded with Mg Kα ( = 1253.6 eV) radiation. For the X-ray radiation, the electron energy analyzer was operated at 180 W (12 kV, 15 mA). The specific surface area and pore size of the catalysts were determined by N2 adsorption-desorption at -196°C on a QUADRASORB SI Automated Surface Area and Pore Size Analyzer (Quantachrome Instruments). Before the measurement, the sample was degassed in vacuum at 350 °C for 1 h.

2.3. Catalytic tests

The catalyst tests were performed in a continuous flow tubular quartz reactor (inner diameter 10 mm) placed in a temperature programmed furnace. The catalyst temperature was controlled by a thermocouple mounted internally. Ozone gas was generated from an ozonizer (JY-3 type, Chengdu Qiangui Purification Equipment Company) and was fed from an independent mass flow controller. Air was from an air compressor, then was separated by an oil-water separator and dried over silica gel. Its flow rate was controlled using a rotameter. Measurement was performed at a relative humidity (RH) of 85%-90% using gas hourly space velocities (GHSV) of 380000, 450000, 510000, and 580000 h-1. The feed gas consisted of 0.6 µL∙L-1 of O3 and balance air. The reactor outlet flow was analyzed using an ozone analyzer (measurement range 0-20 µL∙L-1, error ±0.02 µL∙L-1, Nanjing 8Shang Technology Co., Ltd.). The activity of the catalyst was calculated on the basis of the equation: O3 conversion = (inlet concentration of O3- outlet concentration of O3)/inlet concentration of O3. The initialconversion was referred to O3 decomposed at 12 °C.

3. Results and discussion
3.1. Synergetic effect between Pd and MnOx

As shown in Fig. 1(a), the initial O3 conversion at 12 °C was 90%, 70% and 30%, and the O3 complete conversion temperature was 36, 44, and 62 °C, for the Pd/MnOx+Pd/γ-Al2O3, MnOx + γ-Al2O3 and Pd/γ-Al2O3 catalysts, respectively. The activities of the catalysts increased with rising reaction temperature, especially for the Pd/γ-Al2O3 sample. At 12-30 °C, the activities of the three catalysts were quite different Pd/γ-Al2O3 < MnOx + γ-Al2O3 < Pd/MnOx+Pd/γ-Al2O3. A synergetic effect between Pd and MnOx was observed.

Fig. 1. conversion as a function of reaction temperature on different catalysts prepared by the sol-gel method (a) and sequential precipitation method (b). Reaction conditions: O3 inlet concentration = 0.6 ± 0.02 µL∙L-1, GHSV = 450000 h-1, RH = 85%-90%.

As shown in Fig. 1(b), the initial O3 conversion at 12 °C was 77% and 56%, and the O3 complete conversion temperature was 46 and 62 °C for the Pd/MnOx/γ-Al2O3 and MnOx/γ-Al2O3 catalysts, respectively. O3 decomposition was enhanced with reaction temperature elevation. The loading of Pd improved the activity of the MnOx/γ-Al2O3 sample due to its activity and resistance to humidity.

Figure 2(a) shows the H2-TPR profiles of the Pd/γ-Al2O3, MnOx+γ-Al2O3, and Pd/MnOx+Pd/γ-Al2O3 catalysts prepared by the sol-gel method. A weak peak at 121 °C was present for the Pd/γ-Al2O3 catalyst. This was attributed to the reduction of the PdO species [22, 23]. For the MnOx + γ-Al2O3 catalyst, broad peaks at 459 and 538 °C were observed, which were ascribed to the reduction of Mn3O4 to MnO [23]. For the Pd/MnOx+ Pd/γ-Al2O3 catalyst, the peak at 116 °C was attributed to the reduction of PdO species [22], the peak at 187 °C was due to Mn2O3 reduced to Mn3O4 [23], and a minor peak at 407 °C belonged to Mn3O4 reduced to MnO [23]. The reduction temperature of MnOx was lowered in the presence of Pd, implying that there was a strong interaction between Pd and MnOx. Xu et al. [24] reported that the presence of Pd lowered the reduction temperature of MnOx due to hydrogen spillover from Pd to the oxide. The interaction of Pd and MnOx improved the reducibility of MnOx. Dhandapani et al. [10] and Ren et al. [25] reported that the activity of MnOx was related to its reducibility. Therefore, the activity of the Pd/MnOx+Pd/γ-Al2O3 catalyst would be enhanced for the decomposition of O3.

Fig. 2. H2-TPR profiles of different catalysts prepared by the sol-gel method (a) and sequential precipitation method (b).

Figure 2(b) exhibits H2-TPR profiles of the MnOx/γ-Al2O3 and Pd/MnOx/γ-Al2O3 catalysts prepared by the sequential precipitation method. For the MnOx/γ-Al2O3 catalyst, the peaks at 175 and 304 °C were attributed to MnO2 reduced to Mn3O4 [23]. The peak at 460 °C was ascribed to Mn3O4 reduced to MnO [23]. For the Pd/MnOx/γ-Al2O3 catalyst, the broad peak at 188 °C may be due to the reduction of PdO and MnO2 to Mn3O4. The reduction temperature of MnOx was decreased, which was due to the interaction of Pd and MnOx. From Fig. 2, it was seen that the reduction of the Pd/MnOx+Pd/γ-Al2O3 catalyst prepared by the sol-gel method was easier than that of the Pd/MnOx/γ-Al2O3 prepared by the sequential precipitation method. This implied that the activity of the Pd/MnOx+Pd/γ-Al2O3 catalyst was better than that of the Pd/MnOx/γ-Al2O3 catalyst.

3.2. Effect of calcination temperature on MnOx on catalytic activity

Figure 3 shows the catalytic activity for O3 decomposition on Pd/MnOx+Pd/γ-Al2O3 or Pd/MnOx/γ-Al2O3 using MnOx prepared by the sol-gel method and sequential precipitation methods and calcined at different temperatures. The experimental results showed that O3 conversion at 12 °C was 86%, 90%, 88%, and 85%, and the O3 complete conversion temperature was 40, 35, 38, and 42 °C over the samples using MnOx prepared by the sol-gel method and MnOx calcination temperatures of 300, 400, 500, and 600 °C, respectively. The calcination temperature of MnOx had a slight impact on the catalytic activity of these catalysts. This indicated that the activity of the prepared catalysts was relatively steady. Ground-level O3 can be completely decomposed at 35 °C at a space velocity of 450000 h-1 over the catalyst prepared by using MnOx calcined at 400 °C.

Fig. 3. O3 conversion on Pd/MnOx+Pd/γ-Al2O3 prepared by the sol-gel method (1,4) and Pd/MnOx/γ-Al2O3 prepared by the sequential precipitation method (2,3) with different calcination temperatures of MnOx. Reaction conditions: O3 inlet concentration = 0.6 ± 0.02 µL∙L-1, GHSV = 450000 h-1, RH = 85%-90%.

The O3 conversion at 12 °C was 67%, 73%, 82%, and 75%, and the O3 complete conversion temperature was 60, 55, 46, and 51 °C over the samples using MnOx prepared by the sequential precipitation method and calcined at 300, 400, 500, and 600 °C, respectively. The effect of the calcination temperature of MnOx on the catalytic activity was obvious.

3.3. XRD analysis

As shown in Fig. 4, the phases of MnOx were Mn3O4 and Mn5O8 when MnOx was calcined at 300 °C. The phases of MnOx were Mn3O4, Mn5O8 and a little Mn2O3 for calcination at both 400 and 500 °C. The phases of MnOx were Mn2O3 and Mn3O4 for calcination at 600 °C. A portion of Mn3O4 was oxidized into Mn2O3 in air, and Mn5O8 was decomposed to Mn2O3 when the calcination temperature was increased from 300 to 400 °C. The diffraction peaks of Mn3O4, Mn5O8, and Mn2O3 were enhanced at 500 °C, and their crystalline gradually became excellent. Mn5O8 was decomposed completely at 600 °C, and the intensities of the diffraction peaks of Mn3O4 and Mn2O3 were stronger and the crystalline became better. Combining the phase of MnOx with the activity data shown in Fig. 3, the activity of the catalyst constituted of Mn3O4, Mn5O8, and Mn2O3 was high for O3 decomposition.

Fig. 4. XRD patterns of Pd/MnOx+Pd/γ-Al2O3 catalyst prepared by the sol-gel method and different calcination temperatures of MnOx.

According to Fig. 5, the phases of MnOx were MnO2 and Mn5O8 at the calcination temperatures of 300, 400, and 500 °C. The phases of MnO2 were Pyrolusite MnO2 and a little Akhtenskite MnO2 at 300 and 400 °C. The phase of MnO2 was only Akhtenskite MnO2 at 500 °C. The phases of MnOx were Mn2O3 and Mn5O8 at 600 °C. The diffraction peaks of MnO2 and Mn5O8 were broad and diffused at 300 °C. The diffraction peaks of MnO2 and Mn5O8 gradually became strong at 400 °C. Pyrolusite MnO2 was completely transformed into Akhtenskite MnO2 at 500 °C. MnO2 disappeared and the diffraction peaks of Mn2O3 appeared at 600 °C.

Fig. 5. XRD patterns of Pd/MnOx/γ-Al2O3 prepared by the sequential precipitation method and different calcination temperatures of MnOx.

Combining with the Fig. 3, the activity of the catalysts followed the order: catalyst containing Akhtenskite MnO2 and Mn5O8 > catalyst constituted of Mn2O3 and Mn5O8 > catalyst with mixed phases of Pyrolusite MnO2, a little Akhtenskite MnO2 and Mn5O8.

According to the result in Figs. 4 and 5, we concluded that the phase of MnOx present was determined by the calcination temperature and preparation method. Mn has valence states of +2, +3, +4, and +7, and many phases as MnO, MnO2, Mn2O3, Mn3O4, and Mn5O8. The excellent activity of the various catalysts differed due to their unique phase composition. For example, the phases of MnOx were Mn3O4, Mn5O8, and Mn2O3 for the catalysts prepared by the sol-gel method. However, the phases of MnOx were Akhtenskite MnO2 and Mn5O8 for the catalysts prepared by the sequential precipitation method. This is an interesting and peculiar phenomenon for O3 decomposition. Dhandapani et al. [10] reported that MnO2 was active. Zhou et al. [12] reported that the mixed phase of MnO2 and Mn2O3 in a proper proportion favored the decomposition of O3. The catalytic activity was excellent on the catalyst constituted of Mn3O4, Mn5O8, and Mn2O3 prepared by the sol-gel method in the paper. Mn3O4 may be seen as 2(MnO)∙MnO2, and Mn5O8 can be seen as 2(MnO)∙3(MnO2). That is, the catalyst constituted of MnO, MnO2, and Mn2O3 has the best activity. The mechanism will be further studied in the future.

3.4. Mn, Pd, and O species on the surface of the catalysts

According to Ref. [26, 27], the binding energy of Mn 2p3/2 was 640.8, 641.8, and 642.6 eV for Mn(II), Mn(III), and Mn(IV), respectively. From the XPS spectra of Mn 2p3/2, it can be seen that the valence states of Mn were +2 and +4 on the surface of the catalyst using MnOx calcined at 300 °C. The valence states of Mn were +2, +3,and +4 on the surface of the catalyst using MnOx calcined at 400, 500, and 600 °C. The amounts of the various valence states of Mn are listed in Table 1. Combining with the XRD results, the amounts of Mn2+ and Mn4+ were decreased when calcination temperature increasing from 300 to 400 °C, and Mn3+ was formed. It was possible that Mn3O4 was partially oxidized into Mn2O3 (2Mn3O4 + 1/2O2 → 3Mn2O3) [28], and Mn5O8 was decomposed into Mn2O3 (4Mn5O8 → 10Mn2O3 + O2). The above reactions were sequential and the amount of Mn3+ was increased at 500 °C. Mn5O8 was completely transformed into Mn2O3 at 600 °C, and the amount of Mn3+ was increased considerably.

Table 1
XPS results of the Mn 2p3/2 peak for Pd/MnOx+Pd/γ-Al2O3 prepared by the sol-gel method and different calcination temperatures of MnOx.

In the XPS spectra of O 1s, the peak with a low binding energy (OI: 529.7-530.1 eV) was attributed to lattice oxygen (O2-), the peak with the middle binding energy (OII: 531.0-531.6 eV) was ascribed to surface adsorbed oxygen (O2-/O-), hydroxide and oxygen vacancy, and the peak with the high binding energy (OIII: 533.0 eV) was due to oxygen in the form of chemically adsorbed water [27, 29]. The amounts of surface adsorbed oxygen (O2-/O-), hydroxide and oxygen vacancy were the highest on the catalyst using MnOx calcined at 400 °C, as shown in Table 2, the following order is at 500 °C > 300 °C > 600 °C.

Table 2
XPS results for the O 1s peak for Pd/MnOx+Pd/γ-Al2O3 prepared by the sol-gel method and different calcination temperatures of MnOx.

For the Pd/MnOx+Pd/γ-Al2O3 catalyst prepared by the sol-gel method, the activity of O3 decomposition was the highest when Mn2+, Mn3+, and Mn4+ in a molar ratio of 1.7:1:3 coexisted and the amount of the surface active oxygen species was the highest.

From the XPS spectra of the Mn 2p3/2 peak, it can be seen that the valence states of Mn were +2 and +4 on the surface of the catalysts using MnOx calcined from 300 to 500 °C. Combining with the XRD results, the phase of MnOx was Mn5O8 and MnO2 for the catalysts using MnOx calcined from 300 to 500 °C. Mn5O8 was constituted of Mn2+ and Mn4+ (2MnO·3MnO2), in agreement with the report in literature [30]. The amounts of Mn2+ and Mn4+ were hardly changed for calcination from 300 to 500 °C listed in Table 3. Pyrolusite MnO2 was gradually transferred into Akhtenskite MnO2 in this range of temperatures. The valence states of Mn were +2, +3, and +4 on the surface of the catalyst using MnOx calcined at 600 °C. The phases of MnOx were Mn5O8 and Mn2O3, MnO2 and some Mn5O8 were decomposed to Mn2O3.

Table 3
XPS results of the Mn 2p3/2 peak for Pd/MnOx/γ-Al2O3 prepared by the sequential precipitation method and different calcination temperatures.

In the XPS spectra of the O 1s peak, the peak at 529.7 eV was attributed to lattice oxygen (O2-), the peak at 531.0 eV was ascribed to surface adsorbed oxygen (O2-/O-), hydroxide and oxygen vacancy, and the peak at 532.3 eV was due to oxygen in chemically adsorbed water [27, 29]. The amount of surface adsorbed oxygen (O2-/O-), hydroxide and oxygen vacancy increased gradually for calcination temperature from 300 to 500 °C, and then was decreased slightly at 600 °C shown in Table 4.

Table 4
XPS results for the O 1s peak for Pd/MnOx/γ-Al2O3 prepared by the sequential precipitation method.

It is helpful for O3 decomposition that Mn2+ and Mn4+ coexisted on the surface of the Pd/MnOx/γ-Al2O3 sample, and the amount of surface active oxygen species was the highest.

Einaga et al. [31] suggested a mechanism for O3 decom­position as O3 + Mnn+ → O2- + Mn(n+2)+ + O2; O3 + O2- + Mn(n+2)+ → O22-+ Mn(n+2)+ + O2; O22- + Mn(n+2)+ → Mnn++O2. This indicated that the active Mnn+ participated in both oxidation and reduction reactions during O3 decomposition, and it underwent a cycle of oxidation-reduction. Therefore, ozone can be decomposed effectively on the surface of catalysts on which MnOx comprised Mn2+ (MnO), Mn3+ (Mn2O3), and Mn4+ (MnO2).

Bulanin et al. [32] reported that first O3 interacted with surface hydroxide to form a hydrogen bond. Secondly, it dissociated and adsorbed on Lewis sites to generate the active oxygen species O2-, O-, and O22- [10, 32]. Li et al. [33] put forward the mechanism of O3 decomposition as O3 + * → O2 + O; O + O3 → O2 + O2; O2→ O2 + (* denoted site). That is, the surface active oxygen species played an important role. Surface adsorbed oxygen, hydroxide, and oxygen vacancy are the active oxygen species in the samples. The catalytic activity of the samples was coincident with the amounts of the active oxygen species [10]. The more surface active oxygen species there is, the better is the catalytic activity, regardless of the preparation method and calcination temperature of the MnOx.

As shown in Table 5, for the Pd-MnOx/γ-Al2O3 samples with the MnOx prepared by the sol-gel and sequential precipitation methods, the binding energies Pd 3d5/2 were from 336.6 to 336.9 eV. The binding energy of Pd in PdO is 336.7 eV [34]. Therefore, Pd in the prepared samples was Pd2+. The binding energy of Pd in Table 5 was in the range of measurement error. This meant that the valence state of Pd was not obviously different on the surface of two samples. The role of Pd and the mechanism of the resistance to water vapor using Pd in the decomposition of O3 will be studied in the future.

Table 5
XPS results for the Pd 3d5/2 and Pd 3d3/2 peaks for Pd-MnOx/γ-Al2O3 prepared by the sol-gel and sequential precipitation methods.
3.5. Textural characteristics of the catalysts

The textural characteristics of the samples prepared using MnOx prepared by different methods are present in Table 6. The specific surface area and total pore volume decreased gradually with elevating of the calcination temperature of MnOx for the catalyst using MnOx prepared by sol-gel method. Although the textural property of the catalyst using MnOx calcined at 300°C was better than that of the catalyst using MnOx calcined at 500 °C, its catalytic activity was low. The textural property and activity of the catalyst using MnOx calcined at 400 °C was better than that of the catalyst using MnOx calcined at 500 °C. This indicated that a better textural property favored O3 decomposition for the same phase of MnOx. The textural property has only a small impact on the activity of the catalyst prepared by the sol-gel method.

Table 6
Textural characteristics of Pd/MnOx+Pd/γ-Al2O3 and Pd/MnOx/γ-Al2O3 using MnOx calcined at different temperatures

The specific surface area decreased sharply, total pore volume remained invariable, and pore diameter decreased slightly and then increased when the calcination temperature of MnOx was increased from 300 to 600 °C for the catalysts that used MnOx prepared by the sequential precipitation method. This showed that the surface area of the prepared catalyst was relatively sensitive to temperature variation. The large porous framework can be easily damaged during thermal treatment, subsequently resulting in a considerable aggregation of crystal grains and a sharp decrease in surface area [35]. The catalyst using MnOx calcined at 500°C has the best performance of O3 decomposition due to a large surface area and pore diameter. A large surface area helps the dispersion of Pd on the surface of catalyst, where Pd would suppress the adsorption of H2O molecules [18]. Therefore, this catalyst would facilitate O3 decomposition under a high relative humidity. A large pore favors O3 mass transfer. It was obvious that the textural property has an obvious impact on the catalytic activity.

We can conclude that the O3 decomposition was closely correlated to the physicochemical properties of the catalysts. The phase of MnOx is important. However, it is not the only factor affecting the activity for O3 decomposition. Actually, the MnOx species, surface active oxygen species, and textural property together determine the catalytic activity.

3.6. Effect of space velocity on the catalytic activity

O3 conversion on the catalysts is illustrated in Fig. 6. It was seen that the O3 initial conversion at 12 °C on the Pd/MnOx+Pd/γ-Al2O3 catalyst using MnOx prepared by the sol-gel method was 93%, 87%, 82%, and 74%, and the O3 complete conversion temperature was 16, 35, 62, and 83 °C at GHSVs of 380000, 450000, 510000, and 580000 h-1, respectively. The O3 initial conversion at 12 °C on the Pd/MnOx/ γ-Al2O3 catalyst using MnOx prepared by the sequential precipitation method was 83%, 77%, 70%, and 61%, and the O3 complete conversion temperature was 23, 46, 71, and 95 °C at GHSVs of 380000, 450000, 510000, and 580000 h-1, respectively.

Fig. 6. O3 conversion on Pd/MnOx+Pd/γ-Al2O3 prepared by the sol-gel method (1,4) and Pd/MnOx/γ-Al2O3 prepared by the sequential precipitation method (2,3) at different space velocities. Reaction conditions: O3 inlet concentration = 0.6 ± 0.02 µL∙L-1, RH = 85%-90%.

Wu et al. [19] reported that the O3 conversion decreased by 10% in the range of GHSVs of 132000-226000 h-1, where the O3 conversion rate was much faster than the rate of transporting the reactant to (or the product away from) the catalyst under the experimental conditions. The O3 conversion rate approached the rate of O3 mass transfer limitation. The O3 decomposition declined by 20% when GHSV changed from 380000-580000 h-1 in our experiments, where the O3 conversion rate was slower than the rate of mass transfer of O3 and O2. O3 contact with the active site was shortened on the surface of catalyst with the increase of GHSV, which decreased O3 decomposition. According to the experimental results, O3 was completely decomposed at room temperature (16-23 °C) at a low GHSV (such as 380000 h-1). Therefore, O3 would be decomposed completely when these catalysts were coated on air conditioner condensers. Also, O3 would be decomposed completely if the catalysts were coated on vehicle radiators when the vehicle was cold started. Furthermore, the O3 complete conversion temperature was 83 °C on the Pd/MnOx+Pd/γ-Al2O3 catalyst prepared by the sol-gel method using MnOx calcined at 400 °C at a higher GHSV (580000 h-1). O3 would be decomposed completely if the catalyst was coated on vehicle radiators in which the temperature ranged from 25 to 90 °C. Therefore, the prepared catalyst has potential application for O3 abatement.

According to analysis above, the activities and physicochemical properties of the catalysts were significantly affected by the preparation method. The activity for O3 decomposition was better on the Pd/MnOx+Pd/γ-Al2O3 catalyst using MnOx prepared by the sol-gel method.

4. Conclusions

Different crystalline phases of MnOx were present at different calcination temperatures of MnOx prepared by different methods. The crystalline phase of MnOx, the MnOx species and surface active oxygen species determined the catalytic activity for O3 decomposition. The textural property also influenced the catalyst activity. The activity for O3 decomposition was higher on the Pd/MnOx+Pd/γ-Al2O3 catalyst that used MnOx prepared by the sol-gel method than on the Pd/MnOx/γ-Al2O3 catalyst that used MnOx prepared by the sequential precipitation method. The activity of the catalyst using MnOx prepared by the sol-gel method was stable, with only a slight fluctuation with the change of the calcination temperature of MnOx.

References
[1] Thompson A M. Science, 1992, 256: 1157
[2] Russell A, Milford J, Bergin M S, McBride S, McNair L, Yang Y, Stockwell W R, Croes B. Science, 1995, 269: 491
[3] Yu L P, Jia J J. J Shandong Univ Sci Technol (Nat Sci) (于林平, 贾建军. 山东科技大学学报(自然科学版)), 2001, 20: 111
[4] Wang W G, Wu J, Liu H N, Guo S C, Chen X M, Luo Y. Chin J Atmos Sci (王卫国, 吴涧, 刘红年, 郭世昌, 陈新梅, 罗燕. 大气科学), 2005, 29: 734
[5] Wu J, Jiang W M, Liu H N, Tang J P, Wang W G. Plateau Meteorology (吴涧, 蒋维楣, 刘红军, 汤剑平, 王卫国. 高原气象), 2003, 22: 132
[6] Nebel C, Bushey G J, Eastman C I, Klingsberg A, Spiro L, Wainwright M. Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology. 3rd Ed. New York: Wiley, 1981, 16: 700
[7] Chen K, Yang H B, Ma Z W, Bi J, Huang L. Atmos Environ, 2013, 79: 119
[8] Wan W X, Xia Y J, Zhang H X, Wang J, Wang X K. Acta Ecolog Sin (万五星, 夏亚军, 张红星,王 娇, 王效科. 生态学报), 2013, 33: 1098
[9] Karlsson P E, Pleijel H, Belhaj M, Danielsson H, Dahlin B, Andersson M, Haneeon M, Munthe J, Grennfelt P. AMBIO, 2005, 34: 32
[10] Dhandapani B, Oyama S T. Appl Catal B, 1997, 11: 129
[11] Japan Air Cleaning Association. Air Cleaning Handbook. Tokyo: Ohm, 1981. 178
[12] Zhou L N, Chen Y Q, Ren C J, Gong M C. Chinese J Inorg Chem (周丽娜, 陈耀强, 任成军, 龚茂初. 无机化学学报), 2013, 29: 2363
[13] Zhang B, Shi R, Zhang P Y, Xu J H. Rare Metal Mat Eng (张博, 史 蕊, 张彭义, 徐九华. 稀有金属材料与工程), 2010, 39: 692
[14] Subrahmanyam C, Bulusha D A, Kiwi Minsker L. Appl Catal B, 2005, 61: 98
[15] Zhang B, Zhang P Y, Shi R, Wang H J. Chin J Catal (张博, 张彭义, 史蕊, 王化军. 催化学报), 2009, 30: 235
[16] Farrauto R J, Heck R M. Catal Today, 2000, 55: 179
[17] Hoke J B, Heck R M, US Patent 6 863 984. 2005
[18] Kameya T, Urano K. J Environ Eng, 2002, 128: 286
[19] Wu M C, Kelly N A. Appl Catal B, 1998, 18: 93
[20] Yu Q W, Zhao M, Liu Z M, Zhang X Y, Zheng L M, Chen Y Q, Gong M C. Chin J Catal (余全伟, 赵明, 刘志敏, 张晓玉, 郑灵敏, 陈耀强, 龚茂初. 催化学报), 2009, 30: 1
[21] Pan H, Zhou L N, Zhu Y, Peng N, Gong M C, Chen Y Q. Chin J Catal (潘浩, 周丽娜, 朱艺, 彭娜, 龚茂初, 陈耀强. 催化学报), 2011, 32:1040
[22] Yao Y L, Fang R M, Shi Z H, Gong M C, Chen Y Q. Chin J Catal (姚艳玲, 方瑞梅, 史忠华, 龚茂初, 陈耀强. 催化学报), 2011, 32: 589
[23] Rezaei E, Soltan J, Chen N, Lin J R. Chem Eng J, 2013, 214: 219
[24] Xu G P, Zhu Y X, Ma J, Yan H J, Xie Y C. Stud Surf Sci Catal, 1997, 112: 333
[25] Ren C J, Zhou L N, Shang H Y, Chen Y Q. Acta Phys-Chim Sin (任成军, 周丽娜, 尚鸿燕, 陈耀强. 物理化学学报), 2014, 30: 957
[26] Santos V P, Pereira M F R, Órfǎo J J M, Figueiredo J L. Appl Catal B, 2010, 99: 353
[27] Wei Y J, Yan L Y, Wang C Z, Xu X G, Wu F, Chen G J. J Phys Chem B, 2004, 108: 18547
[28] Berbenni V, Marini A. Mater Res Bull, 2003, 38: 1859
[29] Chen H Y, Sayari A, Adnot A, Larachi F. Appl Catal B, 2001, 32: 195
[30] Thota S, Prasad B, Kumar J. Mater Sci Eng B, 2010, 167: 153
[31] Einaga H, Harada M, Futamura S. Chem Phys Lett, 2005, 408: 377
[32] Bulanin K M, Lavalley J C, Tsyganenko A A. Colloid Surface A, 1995, 101: 153
[33] Li W, Oyama S T. J Am Chem Soc, 1998, 120: 9047
[34] Corro G, Cano C, Fierro J L G. J Mol Catal A, 2010, 315: 35
[35] Sun W, Zhang S Q, Liu Z X, Wang C, Mao Z Q. Int J Hydrogen Energ, 2008, 33: 1112