催化学报  2016, Vol. 37 Issue (1): 184-192   PDF (506 KB)    
扩展功能
加入收藏夹
复制引文信息
加入引用管理器
Email Alert
RSS
本文作者相关文章
吴明周
詹望成
郭耘
王筠松
郭杨龙
龚学庆
王丽
卢冠忠
Solvent-free selective oxidation of cyclohexane with molecular oxygen over manganese oxides: Effect of the calcination temperature
Mingzhou Wu, Wangcheng Zhan , Yun Guo, Yunsong Wang, Yanglong Guo, Xueqing Gong, Li Wang, Guanzhong Lu     
Key Laboratory for Advanced Materials and Research Institute of Industrial Catalysis, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237, China
Abstract: The effects of calcination temperature on the physicochemical properties of manganese oxide catalysts prepared by a precipitation method were assessed by X-ray diffraction, N2 adsorption-desorption, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, H2 temperature-programmed reduction, O2 temperature-programmed desorption, and thermogravimetry-differential analysis. The catalytic performance of each of these materials during the selective oxidation of cyclohexane with oxygen in a solvent-free system was subsequently examined. It was found that the MnOx-500 catalyst, calcined at 500 ℃, consisted of a Mn2O3 phase in addition to Mn5O8 and Mn3O4 phases and possessed a low surface area. Unlike MnOx-500, the MnOx-400 catalyst prepared at 400 ℃ was composed solely of Mn3O4 and Mn5O8 and had a higher surface area. The pronounced catalytic activity of this latter material for the oxidation of cyclohexene was determined to result from numerous factors, including a higher concentration of surface adsorbed oxygen, greater quantities of the surface Mn4+ ions that promote oxygen mobility and the extent of O2 adsorption and reducibility on the catalyst. The effects of various reaction conditions on the activity of the MnOx-400 during the oxidation of cyclohexane were also evaluated, such as the reaction temperature, reaction time, and initial oxygen pressure. Following a 4 h reaction at an initial O2 pressure of 0.5 MPa and 140 ℃, an 8.0% cyclohexane conversion and 5.0% yield of cyclohexanol and cyclohexanone were achieved over the MnOx-400 catalyst. In contrast, employing MnOx-500 resulted in a 6.1% conversion of cyclohexane and 75% selectivity for cyclohexanol and cyclohexanone. After being recycled through 10 replicate uses, the catalytic activity of the MnOx-400 catalyst was unchanged, demonstrating its good stability.
© 2016, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Key words: Manganese oxide catalyst     Selective oxidation of cyclohexane     Oxygen     Calcination temperature     Solvent-free reaction    
氧化锰催化剂在环己烷无溶剂选择性氧化反应中的活性:焙烧温度的影响
吴明周, 詹望成 , 郭耘, 王筠松, 郭杨龙, 龚学庆, 王丽, 卢冠忠     
华东理工大学结构可控先进功能材料及其制备教育部重点实验室和工业催化研究所, 上海200237
摘要: 环己醇和环己酮俗称KA油,是用于制备尼龙材料的己二酸和己内酰胺的重要中间体.工业上制取环己醇和环己酮的方法主要为苯酚加氢法、环己烯水合法和环己烷氧化法,其中环己烷氧化法的应用最为普遍,包括硼酸氧化法、过氧化物氧化法和钴盐催化氧化法三种路线.为获得适宜的环己醇和环己酮选择性,工业上环己烷氧化单程转化率通常控制在5.0%以下,从而使得产物选择性在80%以上.因此,现有环己烷氧化法生产KA油的最大挑战是如何同时获得高环己烷转化率和高KA油选择性.迄今,已有多种催化剂被尝试用于环己烷氧化反应,包括金属卟啉、金属氧化物、分子筛、碳纳米管和金属-有机骨架材料等.由于均相催化剂无法从环己烷氧化反应体系中分离出来,导致催化剂不能重复利用,因此多相催化剂的研究更受青睐.另外,由于采用氧气为氧化剂时具有环境友好和更高的原子经济性,因此氧气选择性氧化环己烷反应已逐渐成为环己烷氧化法制KA油中最具挑战性的研究.目前,氧气为氧化剂时的环己烷转化率通常低于过氧化氢和叔丁基过氧化氢等为氧化剂时的转化率,其关键在于适用于固(催化剂)液(环己烷)气(氧化剂)反应体系的高性能催化剂.本课题组前期研究了系列金属掺杂分子筛(Ce/AlPO-5,Ce-MCM-41/48和Mg-Cu/SBA-15等)对氧气催化氧化环己烷的反应性能,发现无论是稀土还是过渡金属掺杂,通过影响环己烷氧化反应的自由基产生和反应历程,可显著提高环己烷转化率或者KA油的选择性. 基于此,本文选择原料易得、成本较低和氧化能力强的氧化锰(MnOx)作为具有强氧化能力的过渡金属氧化物的代表,深入研究了MnOx的焙烧温度对其结构和选择性氧化环己烷反应性能的影响,同时研究了反应条件对催化剂性能的影响.
结果表明,400℃焙烧制得的催化剂(MnOx-400)比350,450和500℃焙烧制得的催化剂具有更高的活性. 在最佳反应条件(140oC,O2起始压力0.5MPa,反应4h)下,使用20mgMnOx-400可使环己烷转化率达8.0%,KA油得率为5.0%.过高的反应温度、过长的反应时间和过高的反应压力都会导致产物被过度氧化,KA油选择性降低.另外,该催化剂重复使用10次,其活性没有明显下降,显示出了很好的稳定性.表征测试结果表明,MnOx催化剂在不同温度焙烧后形成了不同的结晶形态: 焙烧温度小于500oC时,催化剂主要组成为Mn3O4和Mn5O8,500oC时主要为Mn3O4,Mn5O8和Mn2O3.而且随着焙烧温度升高,MnOx催化剂的比表面积逐渐降低.相比于350oC焙烧制得的催化剂,MnOx-400催化剂具有更好的结晶形态,这可能是造成其活性较好的原因.而相比于MnOx-400,500oC焙烧制得的催化剂表面Mn4+含量和表面吸附氧含量较低,使其吸附和活化氧能力降低,从而导致催化剂活性低于MnOx-400;但是吸附和活化氧能力的降低有利于减缓反应产物的深度氧化,因而KA油的选择性增加.
关键词: 氧化锰     环己烷选择氧化     氧气     焙烧温度     无溶剂反应    

1. Introduction

The selective liquid phase oxidation of cyclic hydrocarbons is one of the most widely used industrial processes producing oxygenates [1]. Because of the importance of cyclohexanol (A) and cyclohexanone (K) in the production of adipic acid and caprolactam, compounds that in turn are used in the manufacture of nylon-6 and nylon-6,6 polymers, the selective oxidation of cyclohexane has become a very important reaction [2, 3]. In general, there is the trade-off between selectivity and high conversion in hydrocarbon liquid phase oxidation reactions. Thus, conditions generating low conversions (less than 5%) are generally preferable as a means of preventing over-oxidation to form undesired by-products [4, 5, 6]. The greatest challenge associated with conventional industrial processes for cyclohexane oxidation is therefore the inherent difficulty in controlling the selectivity for the target products while obtaining a high conversion [7].

To date, a large number of catalysts have been reported for the oxidation of cyclohexane, such as metalloporphyrins [8, 9], metal oxides [10−12], molecular sieves [13−16], carbon nanotubes [17, 18], metal-organic frameworks materials [19, 20], and small organic molecules [21]. Recently, polyoxometalate-based organic-inorganic hybrids demonstrated superior catalytic activity, producing a 29.4% yield of KA oil using H2O2 as the oxidant with acetonitrile as the solvent [22]. This same work also investigated changing the structure of the ionic liquid (IL) cation and obtained homogeneous catalysts having the structure [MimC4]5PMoV2 IL-cation. Using this catalyst, a 28.5% yield of KA oil was obtained from the cyclohexane oxidation. However, a homogeneous catalyst such as this cannot be separated from the reaction mixture and recycled. Therefore, significant research work has been devoted to the development of heterogeneous catalysts for the selective oxidation of cyclohexane as substitutes for conventional homogeneous catalysts.

Iglesia et al. [23] reported that Mn species in MnAPO materials can serve as active sites during cyclohexane oxidation when using O2 as the oxidant. Xu et al. [24] also studied the catalytic activity of MnAPO materials with regard to cyclohexane oxidation, and reported 3.7% conversion of cyclohexane and 64.5% selectivity for KA oil. However, the complicated process required to synthesize these catalysts and the uneconomical raw materials limit the potential industrial applications of these materials. Various hetero-mixed oxide catalysts have also been studied for the oxidation of cyclohexane, and WO3/V2O5 has exhibited high catalytic activity with H2O2 as the oxidant [11]. Unfortunately, this approach suffers from the toxicity of the vanadium-based catalyst, and so effective, environmentally friendly, inexpensive and safe catalysts for the oxidation of cyclohexane are still required.

The catalytic oxidation of cyclohexane with oxygen as the oxidant has also been widely studied because of the inherently environmentally friendly nature of this process, although the resulting cyclohexane conversion is generally lower compared with that obtained with H2O2 or tert-butyl hydroperoxide (TBHP). Yang et al. [18] proposed that cyclohexane oxidation proceeds through a radical mechanism with O2 as the oxidant. Hence, in some cases, the use of a radical initiator such as H2O2 or TBHP in the reaction mixture decreases the induction period and increases the conversion of cyclohexane. Chen et al. [25] also added TBHP to a cyclohexane reaction mixture as a free radical initiator to increase both the reaction rate and the conversion of cyclohexane. Recently, hollow sulfated V-doped TS-1 photocatalysts were evaluated for the selective photooxidation of cyclohexane with molecular oxygen and exhibited high efficiency (TOF = 2.37 h-1, based on the molar amount of V sites) and chemoselectivity (cyclohexanone/cyclohexanol molar ratio = 3.46) [26].

Compared with molecular sieves and metal-organic frameworks materials, transition metal oxides are much easier to prepare and to apply in industrial processes. In the present work, we selected a transition metal oxide (manganese oxide) as the catalyst for the solvent-free oxidation of cyclohexane with molecular oxygen because this oxide is inexpensive, readily available, and environmentally friendly. This study investigated the effect of the calcination temperature on the physicochemical properties of manganese oxide catalysts prepared by a precipitation method. Based on the relationship between the calcination temperature and the resulting physicochemical properties and catalytic performance of the manganese oxide catalysts, we attempted to synthesize a highly effective and stable oxide catalyst for the solvent-free oxidation of cyclohexane with molecular oxygen.

2. Experimental
2.1. Synthesis of catalysts

Manganese oxide catalysts were prepared by a precipitation method using an aqueous Mn(NO3)2 solution as the source of Mn. In a typical procedure, a quantity of a 50 wt% Mn(NO3)2 solution was added to a 250-mL three-neck flask followed by the dropwise addition of a aqueous NaOH solution (1 mol/L) at 60 °C with stirring until the mixture reached a pH of 8. The solution was subsequently held at 60 °C for 4 h with stirring during which time its pH was maintained at 8 by adding the NaOH solution as required. The solid product was collected by filtration, washed several times with de-ionized water, dried at 120 °C overnight, and finally calcined in air at either 350, 400, 450, or 500 °C for 4 h. The corresponding samples are designated as MnOx-350, MnOx-400, MnOx-450, and MnOx-500, respectively.

2.2. Characterization of catalysts

X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were recorded on a Bruker AXS D8 Focus X-ray diffractometer with Cu Kα radiation (λ = 0.15406 nm) at a scanning rate of 6°/min. N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms were acquired on an ASAP 2010 analyzer (Micromeritics) at −196 °C. Prior to these measurements, all samples were degassed at 300 °C for 6 h under vacuum to remove moisture and any volatile impurities. The Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) method was used to calculate the specific surface areas of samples. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was performed using a Thermo ESCALAB 250 spectrometer with a monochromatized Al Ka X-ray source (1486.6 eV), employing the C 1s (binding energy 284.6 eV) peak of adventitious carbon as a reference. Thermogravimetry-differential thermal analysis (TG-DTA) was carried out using a PerkinElmer Pyris Diamond instrument together with a WCT-2 thermal analyzer at a rate of 10 °C/min in air.

H2 temperature-programmed reduction (H2-TPR) profiles were collected with a PX200 apparatus (Tianjin Pengxiang Technology Co., Ltd., China) equipped with a thermal conductivity detector (TCD). The samples were heated from room temperature to 800 °C at a rate of 10 °C/min under 5 vol% H2 in N2 (40 mL/min). The hydrogen consumption during this process was measured quantitatively by the TCD. O2 temperature-programmed desorption (O2-TPD) was performed using a conventional flow system equipped with a quadrupole mass spectrometer (MS, INFICON IPC400). In these trials, a 200-mg sample was pretreated in Ar at its original calcination temperature for 1 h. After cooling to 50 °C, the sample was again pretreated in 3 vol% O2 in He (30 mL/min) for 1 h, after which the system was flushed with Ar for 30 min to sweep residual oxygen from the sample surface. Finally, the sample was heated from 50 to 800 °C at a heating rate of 10 °C/min, and the gas released was analyzed online using the MS.

2.3. Catalytic activity analysis

The catalytic performance of the catalysts during cyclohexane oxidation was assessed in a 50-mL Teflon-lined stainless steel autoclave while stirring. Molecular oxygen was used as the oxidant without any solvent. In a typical reaction, 8 mL cyclohexane and 20 mg catalyst were introduced into the reactor. Subsequently, O2 was introduced until the desired initial pressure was obtained at room temperature, after which the reactor was heated to 140 °C with stirring and these conditions were maintained for 4 h. The post-reaction mixture was analyzed using a PerkinElmer Clarus 500gas chromatograph equipped with a PE-2 capillary column (25 m × 0.32 mm × 1.0 μm) and a flame ionization detector (FID). Methylbenzene was used as the internal standard. The main by-products of the reaction were found to be hexanedioic acid, hexanoic acid, dicyclohexyl adipate, and cyclohexyl caproate (Scheme 1). The concentration of acids in the reaction solution was determined by titration with 0.1 mol/L NaOH.

Scheme 1. Oxidation of cyclohexane.
2.4. Recycling of the catalyst

Recycling trials were carried out using solely the MnOx-400 catalyst. Following completion of each reaction trial, the catalyst was separated by filtration from the reaction solution, washed with ethanol three times in a glass beaker with stirring, dried at 100 °C for 6 h, and calcined in air at 400 °C for 2 h, thus producing the regenerated catalyst. The catalytic performance of the regenerated catalyst together with a supplement of fresh catalyst was then examined using the same reaction procedures applied with the fresh catalyst.

3. Results and discussion
3.1. XRD

The powder XRD patterns of MnOx samples calcined at different temperatures are shown in Fig. 1. The diffraction peaks of the MnOx-350 sample are consistent with those of hausmannite Mn3O4 (JCPDS 24-0734) and Mn5O8 (JCPDS 39-1218). The Mn3O4 can be considered to have a spinel structure composed of Mn2+(Mn3+)2O4, in which Mn2+ and Mn3+ occupy the tetrahedral and octahedral sites of the structure, respectively [27]. During the calcination process, the octahedral Mn3+ ions in Mn3O4 are oxidized to Mn4+ preferentially over Mn2+, leading to the formation of (Mn2+)2(Mn4+)3O8 [28]. In the case of the MnOx-400 and MnOx-450 samples, the intensities of the Mn3O4 and Mn5O8 diffraction peaks are markedly strengthened. When the calcination temperature is further increased to 500 °C, Mn2O3 peaks appear in the pattern of the MnOx-500 sample, and this evidently becomes the main MnOx phase.

Fig. 1. XRD patterns of MnOx-350 (1), MnOx-400 (2), MnOx-450 (3), and MnOx-500 (4) samples.
3.2. N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms

The N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms and the pore size distributions of samples are shown in Fig. 2. All isotherms exhibit typical V-type shapes as defined by IUPAC. The BET surface areas, average pore diameters, and pore volumes of samples are listed in Table 1. The BET surface areas of the MnOx samples are seen to have decreased with increases in the calcination temperature, such that the BET surface areas of the MnOx-350 and MnOx-500 were 31.4 and 20.5 m2/g, respectively. The pores in these samples are secondary particle- piled pores composedof MnOx, and both the pore volume and pore diameter show only a very slight variation with increasing calcination temperature.

Fig. 2. N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms and pore size distributions (inset) of MnOx-350 (1), MnOx-400 (2), and MnOx-500 (3) samples.

Table 1
Textural properties of MnOx-350, MnOx-400, and MnOx-500 samples.
3.3. XPS results

The XPS Mn 2p and O 1s spectra of the MnOx-400 and MnOx-500 samples are shown in Fig. 3. The Mn and O atom surface concentrations are summarized in Table 2. It can be seen that the surface concentrations of Mn and O on the MnOx-400 sample are close to those on the MnOx-500.

Fig. 3. XPS Mn 2p (a) and O 1s (b) spectra of MnOx-400 (1) and MnOx-500 (2) samples.

The Mn 2p peaks can be deconvoluted to three peaks, and the peaks at binding energy (BE) values of 640.8 and 641.9 eV are assigned to Mn3+ and Mn4+, respectively, while the peak at 643.6 eV is a satellite peak of manganese [29, 30]. The Mn4+/(Mn4++Mn3+) atomic ratios were calculated from these XPS spectra using XPSPEAK 4.1 and are presented in Table 2. It is evident that the Mn4+/(Mn4++Mn3+) ratio of the MnOx-400 sample is higher than that of the MnOx-500, as result of the appearance of a Mn2O3 phase in the MnOx-500 (Fig. 1). This phase is responsible for the greater oxidation ability of the MnOx-400 sample compared with the MnOx-500.

Table 2
Surface atom concentrations on MnOx-400 and MnOx-500 samples as determined by XPS.

The XPS O 1s spectra of the MnOx-400 and MnOx-500 samples are also provided in Fig. 3, and here two peaks can be distinguished at 530 and 531 eV. The peak at 530 eV is assigned to lattice oxygen (O2-, Olat), while the peak at 531 eV is attributed to surface oxygen (Oads). These species include surface- adsorbed oxygen and weakly bonded oxygen, such as O22− or O, belonging to defect-oxide or hydroxyl-like surface groups [31, 32]. The Oads/(Oads+Olat) ratios of both MnOx samples were calculated and are given in Table 2. It is interesting to observe that the Oads/(Oads+Olat) ratio for the MnOx-400 sample is slightly higher than that for the MnOx-500 sample, indicating that the MnOx-400 has more surface oxygen. This suggests greater oxidation ability for this material compared with the MnOx-500, which in turn favors the selective oxidation of cyclohexane when using O2 as the oxidant.

3.4. H2-TPR results

The H2-TPR profiles of the MnOx-400 and MnOx-500 samples are shown in Fig. 4. There are two reduction peaks in the MnOx-400 sample, at 315 and 450 °C, attributed to the reductions Mn5O8 → Mn3O4 and Mn3O4 → MnO, respectively [33]. With regard to the MnOx-500 sample, four reduction peaks are seen at 161, 348, 376, and 500 °C. The small reduction peak at 161 °C can be attributed to the reduction of Mn(III) in tetrahedral sites [34, 35], while the two overlapped peaks at 348 and 376 °C are assigned to Mn5O8 → Mn3O4 and Mn2O3 → Mn3O4 respectively, and the peak at 500 °C is assigned to Mn3O4 → MnO [28, 36, 37]. Compared with the MnOx-400 sample, the main reduction peaks of the MnOx-500 sample are obviously shifted to higher temperatures, showing the lower reducibility of the MnOx-500 sample.

Fig. 4. H2-TPR profiles of MnOx-400 (1) and MnOx-500 (2) samples.
3.5. O2-TPD results

Figure 5 presents the O2-TPD profiles of the MnOx-400 and MnOx-500 samples. The MnOx-400 sample exhibits three desorption peaks at 487, 613, and 772 °C. The peaks at 487 and 613 °C are attributed to the desorption of adsorbed and lattice oxygen from Mn5O8 to Mn2O3, while the peak at 772 °C is assigned to the desorption of lattice oxygen from Mn2O3 to Mn3O4 [35]. The MnOx-500 sample only generates a weak peak at 540 °C and a strong peak at 844 °C, assigned to the desorptions of adsorbed and lattice oxygen from Mn2O3 to Mn3O4 [35, 38]. It can be seen that the MnOx-400 sample has a greater capacity for O2 adsorption compared with the MnOx-500, which could account for the higher reactivity of the MnOx-400 sample for the selective oxidation of cyclohexane by O2.

Fig. 5. O2-TPD profiles of MnOx-400 (1) and MnOx-500 (2) samples.
3.6. TG-DTA results

Figure 6 shows the TG-DTA curves obtained from the MnOx-400 sample before and after the selective oxidation of cyclohexane. Following the reaction, the MnOx-400 sample was collected by filtration, washed several times with deionized water, and dried overnight at 120 °C. The resulting sample was assessed by TG-DTA analysis with the results presented in Fig. 6. It can be seen that the mass of the unreacted MnOx-400 sample exhibits a very slow decrease on heating due to the loss of adsorbed water, and does not generate an obvious exothermic peak in its DTA curve. This result indicates that the MnOx-400 sample is stable when heated to 800 °C. After being used in the reaction, the MnOx-400 sample undergoes a mass loss of 83% as the temperature is raised to 400 °C, accompanied by a strong exothermic peak at approximately 400 °C, which is due to the combustion of carbon deposited on the MnOx-400 sample during the reaction [39, 40].

Fig. 6. TG-DTA curves of the MnOx-400 sample before (1) and after (2) the reaction.
3.7. Catalytic performance of MnOx catalysts

Table 3 summarizes the catalytic performance of the MnOx catalysts for the selective oxidation of cyclohexane with O2 as the oxidant. These results show that a 1.2% conversion of cyclohexane with 92% total selectivity for KA oil was achieved in the blank test. Using MnOx as the catalyst, the conversion of cyclohexane was greatly increased while the selectivity for KA markedly decreased. The calcination temperature evidently had a significant effect on the catalytic activity of the MnOx. As the calcination temperature applied to the MnOx catalysts was increased, the conversion of cyclohexane first increased and then decreased, although the total selectivity for KA oil exhibited a continual gradual increase. As shown in Table 3, when employing the MnOx-400 catalyst, an 8.0% conversion of cyclohexane was achieved with 62% total selectivity for KA oil, such that the yield of KA oil was 5.0%. When using the MnOx catalyst calcined at 500 °C, the conversion of cyclohexane decreased to 6.1%, but the selectivity for KA oil increased to 75%. Compared with the MnOx-400 catalyst, the MnOx-500 catalyst exhibited a lower surface area and lower concentrations of surface Mn4+ and surface oxygen (Oads), which account for its reduced ability for O2 adsorption and activation and the lower conversion of cyclohexane that it provides. In contrast, the MnOx-500 catalyst’s lower ability for O2 adsorption and activation also limited the over-oxidation of cyclohexanol and cyclohexanone, leading to the increase in its selectivity for KA oil. The reported performance of other catalysts intended for the selective oxidation of cyclohexane is also listed in Table 3. When using O2 as the oxidant, the MnOx-400 catalyst showed higher activity for the selective oxidation of cyclohexane than has been reported for Co-TUD-1, Au/MgO, and Mn3O4 in the literature [41, 42, 43]. However, the yield of KA oil over the MnOx-400 catalyst was much lower than that obtained from a Mn-TUD-1 catalyst when employing TBHP as the oxidant [44].

Table 3
Catalytic performance of the MnOx catalysts for the selective oxidation of cyclohexane with O2.
3.8. Effect of reaction conditions on the activity of the MnOx-400 catalyst

The effects of the reaction temperature, reaction time, and the initial oxygen pressure on the catalytic activity of the MnOx-400 catalyst for the cyclohexane oxidation were evaluated. As shown in Fig. 7(a), with increases in the reaction temperature from 120 to 160 °C, the conversion of cyclohexane gradually increased, while the selectivity for cyclohexanol and cyclohexanone markedly decreased at first, then plateaued. This occurs because the higher reaction temperature enhances the activation of cyclohexane but also promotes the over-oxidation of cyclohexanol and cyclohexanone to esters, which can be detected by GC-MS. Considering both the conversion of cyclohexane and the selectivity for KA oil, it can be seen that the most appropriate reaction temperature is 140 °C.

Fig. 7. Effect of the reaction temperature (a), reaction time (b), and initial oxygen pressure (c) on the catalytic activity of MnOx-400 for cyclohexane oxidation. Reaction conditions: cyclohexane 4 mL, catalyst 20 mg; (a) O2 0.5 MPa, 4 h; (b) O2 0.5 MPa, 140 °C; (c) 140 °C, 4 h.

The effect of the reaction time on the activity of the MnOx-400 catalyst for cyclohexane oxidation is summarized in Fig. 7(b). Increasing the reaction time evidently results in a slight enhancement of the cyclohexane conversion, while the selectivity for cyclohexanol and cyclohexanone decreases gradually because of the over-oxidation of cyclohexanol and cyclohexanone [45, 46]. The generation of acidic by-products changed only minimally with variations in the reaction time, although esters resulting from over-oxidation of cyclohexanol and cyclohexanone were detected by GC-MS. From these data, the optimal reaction time appears to be 4 h.

Figure 7(c) shows the effect of the initial O2 pressure on the cyclohexane oxidation over the MnOx-400 catalyst. The results demonstrate that raising the initial oxygen pressure can enhance both the conversion of cyclohexane and the selectivity for acids, and thus reduce the selectivity for cyclohexanol and cyclohexanone. This phenomenon may be caused by the over-oxidation of cyclohexanol and cyclohexanone under high pressure O2. Taking into account both the conversion of cyclohexane and the selectivity for KA oil, the optimal initial O2 pressure is evidently 0.5 MPa.

3.9. Repeated use of the MnOx-400 catalyst

After the reaction finished, the catalyst was separated by filtration from the reaction solution, washed with ethanol three times, dried at 100 °C for 6 h, then calcined in air at 400 °C for 2 h. The catalytic activity of this regenerated MnOx-400 catalyst was subsequently assessed, and the results obtained from 10 such recycling trials are shown in Fig. 8. It can be seen that the conversion of cyclohexane and the selectivity for KA oil are barely changed by the repeated usage. These results indicate that the MnOx-400 catalyst exhibits good stability for the selective oxidation of cyclohexane by O2 in a solvent-free system.

Fig. 8. Effect of recycling on the catalytic activity of MnOx-400 for cyclohexane oxidation.
4. Conclusions

The effect of calcination temperature on the physicochemical and catalytic properties of MnOx catalysts prepared by the precipitation method was investigated. These MnOx catalysts exhibited high catalytic performance during the selective oxidation of cyclohexane with O2 in a solvent-free system. The calcination temperature markedly affected the catalytic activity, such that the catalyst calcined at 400 °C exhibited the highest activity, giving an 8.0% cyclohexane conversion and a 5.0% yield of cyclohexanol and cyclohexanone at 0.5 MPa initial O2 pressure and 140 °C over 4 h. After 10 reaction cycles, the catalytic activity of the MnOx-400 catalyst was unchanged, demonstrating that this material is highly stable during the selective oxidation of cyclohexane by O2 in a solvent-free system. Compared with the MnOx-500 catalyst, the MnOx-400 catalyst, consisting of both Mn3O4 and Mn5O8, possessed a higher surface area and elevated concentrations of surface adsorbed oxygen and surface Mn4+ ions. These species can promote oxygen mobility, O2 adsorption, and the reducibility of the catalyst, leading to the observed superior catalytic activity of the MnOx-400 catalyst for the selective oxidation of cyclohexane in a solvent-free system.

References
[1] E. Roduner, W. Kaim, B. Sarkar, V. B. Urlacher, J. Pleiss, R. Gläser, W. D. Einicke, G. A. Sprenger, U. Beifuß, E. Klemm, C. Liebner, H. Hieronymus, S. F. Hsu, B. Plietker, S. Laschat.. ChemCatChem, 2013, 5, 82.
[2] A. Sakthivel, P. Selvam.. J. Catal., 2002, 211, 134.
[3] L. Gómez-Hortigüela, F. Corà, C. R. A. Catlow.. ACS Catal., 2011, 1, 18.
[4] K. Kamata, K. Yonehara, Y. Nakagawa, K. Uehara, N. Mizuno.. Nat. Chem., 2010, 2, 478.
[5] K. Weissermel, H. J. Horpe, Industrial Organic Chemistry, 2nd ed., Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 1993.
[6] A. K. Suresh, M. M. Sharma, T. Sridhar.. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2000, 39, 3958.
[7] U. Schuchardt, D. Cardoso, R. Sercheli, R. Pereira, R. S. de Cruz, M. C. Guerreiro, D. Mandelli, E. V. Spinace, E. L. Fires.. Appl. Catal. A, 2001, 211, 1.
[8] C. C. Guo, M. F. Chu, Q. Liu, Y. Liu, D. C. Guo, X. Q. Liu.. Appl. Catal. A, 2003, 246, 303.
[9] C. C. Guo, G. Huang, X. B. Zhang, D. C. Guo.. Appl. Catal. A, 2003, 247, 261.
[10] L. P. Zhou, J. Xu, H. Miao, F. Wang, X. Q. Li.. Appl. Catal. A, 2005, 292, 223.
[11] P. R. Makgwane, S. S. Ray.. Catal. Commun., 2014, 54, 118.
[12] A. Selvamani, M. Selvaraj, M. Gurulakshmi, R. Ramya, K. Shanthi.. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol., 2014, 14, 2864.
[13] R. Zhao, Y. Q. Wang, Y. L. Guo, Y. Guo, X. H. Liu, Z. G. Zhang, Y. S. Wang, W. C Zhan, G. Z. Lu.. Green Chem., 2006, 8, 459.
[14] W. C. Zhan, G. Z. Lu, Y. L. Guo, Y. Guo, Y. Q. Wang, Y. S. Wang, Z. G. Zhang, X. H. Liu.. J. Rare Earths, 2008, 26, 515.
[15] J. Li, Y. Shi, L. Xu, G. Z. Lu.. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2010, 49, 5392.
[16] G. Qian, D. Ji, G. M. Lu, R. Zhao, Y. X. Qi, J. S. Suo.. J. Catal., 2005, 232, 378.
[17] H. Yu, F. Peng, J. Tan, X. W. Hu, H. J. Wang, J. Yang, W. X. Zheng.. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2011, 50, 3978.
[18] X. X. Yang, H. Yu, F. Peng, H. J. Wang.. ChemSusChem, 2012, 5, 1213.
[19] N. V. Maksimchuk, K. A. Kovalenko, V. P. Fedin, O. A. Kholdeeva.. Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 6812.
[20] J. L. Long, H. L. Liu, S. J. Wu, S. J. Liao, Y. W. Li.. ACS Catal., 2013, 3, 647.
[21] Y. C. Zhang, W. L. Dai, G. J. Wu, N. J. Guan, L. D. Li.. Chin. J. Catal., 2014, 35, 279.
[22] S. Xue, G. J. Chen, Z. Y. Long, Y. Zhou, J. Wang.. RSC Adv., 2015, 5, 19306.
[23] B. Modén, L. Oliviero, J. Dakka, J. G. Santiesteban, E. Iglesia.. J. Phys. Chem. B, 2004, 108, 5552.
[24] L. P. Zhou, J. Xu, H. Miao, X. Q. Li, F. Wang.. Catal. Lett., 2005, 99, 231.
[25] C. Chen, J. Xu, Q. H. Zhang, H. Ma, H. Miao, L. P. Zhou.. J. Phys. Chem. C, 2009, 113, 2855.
[26] W. Z. Zhong, T. Qiao, J. Dai, L. Q. Mao, Q. Xu, G. Q. Zou, X. X. Liu, D. L. Yin, F. P. Zhao.. J. Catal., 2015, 330, 208.
[27] J. Pike, J. Hanson, L. H. Zhang, S. W. Chan.. Chem. Mater., 2007, 19, 5609.
[28] Q. F. Deng, T. Z. Ren, Z. Y. Yuan.. React. Kinet. Mech. Catal., 2013, 108, 507.
[29] S. J. Yang, C. Z. Wang, J. H. Li, N. Q. Yan, L. Ma, H. Z. Chang.. Appl. Catal. B, 2011, 110, 71.
[30] J. H. Chen, M. Q. Shen, X. Q. Wang, G. S. Qi, J. Wang, W. Li.. Appl. Catal. B, 2013, 134-135, 251.
[31] X. Y. Wang, K. Qian, L. Dao.. Appl. Catal. B, 2009, 86, 166.
[32] H. C. Yao, Y. F. Yu Yao.. J. Catal., 1984, 86, 254.
[33] J. Carnö, M. Ferrandon, E. Björnbom, S. Järås.. Appl. Catal. A, 1997, 155, 265.
[34] W. M. Wang, Y. N. Yang, J. Y. Zhang.. Appl. Catal. A, 1995, 133, 81.
[35] E. R. Stobbe, B. A. de Boer, J. W. Geus.. Catal. Today, 1999, 47, 161.
[36] J. Papavasiliou, G. Avgouropoulos, T. Ioannides.. J. Catal., 2007, 251, 7.
[37] A. A. Mirzaei, H. R. Shaterian, M. Habibi, G. J. Hutchings, S. H. Taylor.. Appl. Catal. A, 2003, 253, 499.
[38] X. Wang, Y. C. Xie.. New J. Chem., 2001, 25, 964.
[39] Y. Kobayashi, J. Horiguchi, S. Kobayashi, Y. Yamazaki, K. Omata, D. Nagao, M. Konno, M. Yamada.. Appl. Catal. A, 2011, 395, 129.
[40] Y. L. Wang, G. H. Luo, X. Xu, J. J. Xia.. Catal. Commun., 2014, 57, 83.
[41] A. Ramanathan, M. S. Hamdy, R. Parton, T. Maschmeyer, J. C. Jansen, U. Hanefeld.. Appl. Catal. A, 2009, 355, 78.
[42] M. Conte, X. Liu, D. M. Murphy, K. Whiston, G. J. Hutchings.. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2012, 14, 16279.
[43] G. Q. Zou, W. Z. Zhong, Q. Xu, J. F. Xiao, C. Liu, Y. Q. Li, L. Q. Mao, S. Kirk, D. L. Yin.. Catal. Commun., 2015, 58, 46.
[44] R. Maheswari, R. Anand, G. Imran.. J. Porous Mater., 2012, 19, 283.
[45] I. Hermans, J. Peeters, P. A. Jacobs.. J. Phys. Chem. A, 2008, 112, 1747.
[46] J. Li, X. Li, Y. Shi, D. S. Mao, G. Z. Lu.. Catal. Lett., 2010, 137, 180.