催化学报  2016, Vol. 37 Issue (6): 955-962   PDF (1018 KB)    
扩展功能
加入收藏夹
复制引文信息
加入引用管理器
Email Alert
RSS
本文作者相关文章
Zhou Ying
Long Jilan
Li Yingwei
Ni-based catalysts derived from a metal-organic framework for selective oxidation of alkanes
Zhou Ying, Long Jilan, Li Yingwei     
State Key Laboratory of Pulp and Paper Engineering, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, Guangdong, China
Foundation Item: This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21322606, 21436005, 21576095), the State Key Laboratory of Pulp and Paper Engineering (2015TS03), the Doctoral Fund of Ministry of Education of China (20120172110012), Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2015ZP002, 2015PT004), and Guangdong Natural Science Foundation (2013B090500027)
* Corresponding author. Jilan Long Tel: +86-15182908656; E-mail: xlong612@126.com Yingwei Li Tel: +86-20-87113656; E-mail: liyw@scut.edu.cn
Abstract: Ni nanoparticles embedded in nitrogen-doped carbon (Ni@C-N) materials were prepared by thermolysis of a Ni-containing metal-organic framework (Ni-MOF) under inert atmosphere. The as-synthesized Ni@C-N materials were characterized by powder X-ray diffraction, N2 adsorption-desorption analysis, scanning electron microscopy, transmission electron microscopy, atomic absorption spectroscopy, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. The MOF-derived Ni-based materials were then examined as heterogeneous catalysts for the oxidation of alkanes under mild reaction conditions. The Ni@C-N composites displayed high activity and selectivity toward the oxidation of a variety of saturated C-H bonds, affording the corresponding oxidation products in good-to-excellent yields. Furthermore, the catalysts could be recycled and reused for at least four times without any significant loss in activity and selectivity under the investigated conditions.
© 2016, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Key words: Nickel     Nanoparticle     Metal-organic framework     Alkane     Oxidation     Heterogeneous catalysis    
金属有机骨架衍生Ni基材料催化烷烃选择氧化
周颖, 隆继兰, 李映伟     
华南理工大学化学与化工学院, 制浆造纸工程国家重点实验室, 广东 广州 510640
摘要:N 掺杂碳基纳米材料由于具有高稳定性、良好的导电性、较大的孔体积和比表面积等特点而受到了国内外广泛的关注, 在气体吸附、催化、电化学以及燃料电池等许多领域表现出潜在应用价值. N 掺杂碳材料的制备主要采用两种方法, 即后合成法和原位合成法. 后合成法是指采用含 N 化合物 (如尿素等) 对已合成的碳材料进行处理, 但所制材料中 N 含量往往偏低, 且 N 活性位不够稳定. 要得到 N 含量较高且稳定的 N 掺杂碳材料常常采用原位合成法, 即以富氮前体作为模板, 在热解过程中 N 原位嵌入碳纳米材料中, 因而具有结构稳定, N 含量丰富等优点. 金属有机骨架 (MOFs) 材料是一种新型的类沸石类多孔材料, 是由金属离子和有机配体通过配位键键合而成的拓扑结构. 该类材料具有较高的孔隙率和比表面积以及结构可调控性等特点. 通过调节金属中心和配体种类, 引入含 N 配体, 可以得到不同类型的含 N 的 MOFs. 此外, 含 N 的 MOFs 在一定温度下热解能有效减少 N 元素的流失, 因此, MOFs 是一类优秀的用于制备 N 掺杂碳基纳米材料的模板材料. 近年来, 以含 N 的金属有机骨架材料为模板, 通过简单热解一步合成 N 掺杂碳基纳米催化剂, 已成为国内外研究的热点之一. 本文在惰性气氛中采用直接热解 Ni 基 MOF 方法制备了 N 掺杂 C 包裹的 Ni 纳米颗粒, 并利用 X 射线粉末衍射 (PXRD)、N2 吸附脱附、扫描电子显微镜 (SEM)、透射电子显微镜 (TEM)、原子吸收光谱 (AAS)、X 射线光电子能谱 (XPS) 等对该复合材料的组成和结构进行了表征. PXRD 测试结果表明, 经过热解, 催化剂中出现了大量的金属 Ni 粒子, 说明 Ni-MOF 中的 Ni2+离子在热解过程中被原位还原成了 Ni 纳米颗粒. N2 吸附脱附结果表明, 热解前的 Ni-MOF 结构中只存在微孔结构, 但是热解 Ni@C-N 材料中生成了大量的介孔或大孔结构, 从而有利于反应底物与催化剂活性位点的接触. SEM 结果表明, 在较低的温度下热解, 催化剂可以保持 MOFs 原来的构型, 且结构疏松多孔; 而在较高的温度下热解, 如 800 oC, 将有大量的碳纳米管生成. TEM 结果表明, 随着热解温度升高, 催化剂中 Ni 纳米颗粒逐渐增大. 从 HRTEM 测试结果可以清晰看出, 高温热解时有石墨烯结构生成, 并且生成的 Ni 纳米颗粒原位嵌入了石墨烯结构中, 因而有利于 Ni 纳米颗粒的分散, 从而提高催化剂的活性. XPS 结果进一步证明, 热解过程中, Ni2+被原位还原成了零价的 Ni 纳米粒子, 此外, N 1s 谱图也进一步证明 N 在热解过程中原位嵌入了生成的石墨烯结构中. 随后, 以乙基苯选择性氧化为模型反应, 测试了 Ni@C-N 材料的催化活性. 结果表明, 该材料在烷烃选择氧化反应中表现出很高的催化活性和选择性, 尤其是 Ni@C-N-900-8h, 在温和的反应条件下, 可有效催化一系列饱和烷烃的选择氧化, 获得很高的氧化产物收率, 且重复利用多次后其活性和选择性没有明显的下降.
关键词     纳米粒子     金属有机骨架     烷烃     氧化     多相催化    
1 Introduction

The selective partial oxidation of alkanes is an important transformation in the production of valuable chemicals and intermediates such as ketones and alcohols [1]. For example, cyclohexanone and cyclohexanol (also known as KA-oil), the two main products of the partial oxidation of cyclohexane, are the key intermediates in the fabrication of polyamide and plastics such as Nylon 6 and Nylon 66 [2]. However, control over the selective oxidation of saturated hydrocarbons is challenging because of the inertness of the saturated C-H bonds and subsequent oxidation issues resulting from the higher reactivity of the products when compared with that of the reactants. Accordingly, the industrial manufacture of KA-oil from cyclohexane oxidation needs careful control (at conversions of <5% with 75%-80% selectivity to KA-oil) to prevent the production of excessive amounts of byproducts owing to over-oxidation [3-5].

Over the past few decades, considerable research efforts have been devoted to exploring efficient and environmentally sound methodologies for the selective oxidation of alkanes. In this regard, heterogeneous catalysis has received the most attention, and various efficient metal catalysts have been developed [6-23]. These catalysts include metal-incorporated molecular sieves [12], metal-substituted molecular sieves [13, 15], supported Au nanoparticles [6-10, 23], metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) [22], and carbon-based materials [24, 25]. However, the development of cost-effective, and highly active and selective heterogeneous catalysts for the oxidation of alkanes remains a great challenge to date.

Of particular interest, MOFs are a well-known, new class of porous functional materials constituting metal ions and organic ligands. Owing to their ordered structures and relatively low thermal stability, MOFs have been used for the preparation of new metal oxides or carbon nanomaterials by thermal decomposition. As reported, MOF-derived materials exhibit excellent performance in various applications including heterogeneous catalysis [26-36], electrochemistry [37, 38], and gas adsorption [39-41]. To our knowledge, reports on the use of MOF-derived materials as catalysts for liquid-phase organic synthesis are rare.

Herein, we report a novel, non-noble Ni-based heterogeneous catalytic system for the selective oxidation alkanes. Various alkanes, such as cyclohexane and ethylbenzene, could be selectively transformed into the desired aldehydes or ketones in high yields under mild conditions. The catalysts were prepared by simple thermolysis of a Ni-containing MOF under inert atmosphere.

2 Experimental
2.1 Synthesis of Ni@C-N catalysis

All chemicals were purchased from commercial corporations and used without further treatment.

Typically, a mixture of Ni(NO)3∙6H2O (0.9 mmol), 1, 4-benzenedicarboxylic acid (H2bdc; 0.72 mmol), triethylenediamine (dabco; 0.58 mmol), and dimethylformamide (DMF; 15 mL) were added to a Teflon-lined autoclave. The reactor was heated in an oven at 120 ℃ for 2 d. The obtained green powder was then washed with DMF and methanol, and finally dried under vacuum at 150 ℃ for 2 h.

The Ni@C-N catalysts were prepared by pyrolysis of Ni-MOF in an inert atmosphere. Ni-MOF was heated at a heating rate of 1 ℃/min from room temperature to 200 ℃ and maintained at this temperature for 2 h in Ar. Then, the temperature was increased to the target temperature (i.e., 500, 600, 700, 800, or 900 ℃) at the same heating rate and subsequently maintained for 8 or 15 h. The resulting samples were denoted as Ni@C-N-x-8h or Ni@C-N-x-15h, where x indicates the target thermolysis temperature (℃).

2.2 Characterization

Powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) patterns of the prepared materials were recorded on a Rigaku diffractometer (D/MAX-ⅢA; 3 kW) using Cu Kα radiation (40 kV, 30 mA, λ = 0.1543 nm). N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms were measured on a Micromeritics ASAP 2020M instrument at -196 ℃ . The Ni content of the samples was determined quantitatively by atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS) on a HITACHI Z-2300. The surface topography of Ni-MOF and the Ni@C-N materials was investigated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM; MERLIN of ZEISS). Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of the samples were recorded on a JEM-2010HR (JEOL) microscope. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurements were performed on a Kratos Axis Ultra DLD system with a base pressure of 1.33 x 10-7 Pa.

2.3 Oxidation of alkanes over Ni@C-N

The oxidation of alkanes (e.g., ethylbenzene) was conducted in a 25-mL Schlenk tube. Typically, ethylbenzene (0.5 mmol), catalyst (10 mol% based on Ni), tert-butyl hydroperoxide (TBHP; 1.5 mmol), and DMF (2 mL) were added to the tube and heated at 80 ℃. After reaction, the catalyst was isolated from the mixture solution by centrifugation, then washed with DMF and methanol. The liquid mixtures were then analyzed by gas chromatography mass spectrometry (Agilent Technologies 7890B-5977A) on a chromatograph equipped with a 0.25 mm × 30 m HP-5MS capillary column.

For the recyclability tests, the catalyst was separated from the reaction mixture and washed with DMF and methanol for several times. The solid was then dried at 80 ℃ in an oven and reduced by H2 at 200 ℃ for 2 h before use for the next run.

3 Results and discussion
3.1 Characterization of the materials

Ni-MOF was prepared according to the procedures described in previous reports [42, 43]. The PXRD pattern of the as-synthesized Ni-MOF (Fig. 1(a)) matched well with the published XRD patterns [42, 43]. The N2 adsorption-desorption isotherm measured at -196 ℃ indicated that Ni-MOF was mostly microporous (Fig. 1(b)). The Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) surface area was calculated to be ~1700 m2/g.

Fig. 1. (a) PXRD pattern and (b) N2 adsorption-desorption isotherm of as-synthesized Ni-MOF.

The Ni@C-N materials were prepared by pyrolysis of Ni-MOF under a continuous flow of Ar for 8 or 15 h at varying temperatures. The Ni contents in the samples were ~35-40 wt%. Fig. 2 shows the PXRD patterns of the Ni@C-N materials. All the prepared materials displayed five diffraction peaks at ~44.4°, 51.8°, 76.4°, 92.9°, and 98.5°, which are characteristics of metallic Ni (JCPDS No. 04-0850) [44]. The intensity of the Ni diffraction peaks increased with increasing pyrolysis temperatures employed, indicating the formation of Ni phase with a higher crystallization degree. The crystallite sizes of Ni Particles in the materials were in the range of 7-10 nm, as calculated by the Scherrer formula.

Fig. 2. PXRD patterns of (a) Ni@C-N-x-8h and (b) Ni@C-N-x-15h.

Fig. 3 shows the N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms of the Ni@C-N materials measured at -196 ℃ . All isotherms featured typical adsorption curves of types Ⅰ and Ⅳ, with an apparent hysteresis loop in the relative pressure (P/P0) range of 0.5-1.0, suggesting the presence of a micro-/meso-/macroporous structure in the Ni@C-N materials. The BET surface areas of the Ni@C-N materials were calculated to be ~100-200 m2/g.

Fig. 3. N2 adsorption (ads)-desorption (des) isotherms of (a) Ni@C-N-x-8h and (b) Ni@C-N-x-15h.

The surface morphology of the Ni@C-N materials was examined by SEM. The SEM images in Fig. 4(a)-(d) depict the initial shape of the Ni-MOF crystals when MOF was calcined below 700 ℃ for 8 h. The surface of the materials became distorted and considerably rougher upon decomposition and carbonization of the MOF. When the pyrolysis temperature increased to 800 ℃, numerous nanotubes were obtained (Fig. 4(e)), which might be catalyzed by the generated Ni nanoparticles.

Fig. 4. SEM images of (a) Ni-MOF, (b) Ni@C-N-500-8h, (c) Ni@C-N-600-8h, (d) Ni@C-N-700-8h, (e) Ni@C-N-800-8h, and (f) Ni@C-N-900-8h.

The TEM images in Fig. 5 revealed that the metallic Ni nanoparticles were highly dispersed in the carbon matrix derived from carbonization of the organic linker in Ni-MOF. At the higher MOF pyrolysis temperatures, aggregation of the Ni nanoparticles into larger particles was observed. When the thermolysis temperature increased to 900 ℃, most of the particles agglomerated into large particles with an average size of ~18 nm (Fig. 6). High-resolution TEM analysis of an individual large particle indicated that each Ni nanoparticle was tightly embedded in the graphitic carbon (Fig. 6(c)).

Fig. 5. TEM images of (a) Ni@C-N-500-8h, (b) Ni@C-N-600-8h, (c) Ni@C-N-700-8h, and (d) Ni@C-N-800-8h.

Fig. 6. (a, b) TEM images of Ni@C-N-900-8h. (c) High-resolution TEM image of a Ni particle and (d) corresponding size distribution of the Ni nanoparticles.

The XPS spectra of Ni-MOF and Ni@C-N-900-8h are shown in Fig. 7. The Ni 2p peaks at 856.0 and 873.6 eV could be assigned to Ni2+ in Ni-MOF (Fig. 7(a)). After thermolysis, the two Ni 2p peaks of Ni@C-N-900-8h respectively shifted to lower binding energies by ~3.2 and ~3.3 eV relative to those of Ni-MOF, indicating that most of the Ni(Ⅱ) ions in MOF were reduced to Ni(0) [45]. This result agreed with common experimental observations, whereby central metal ions of MOF with reduction potentials higher than 0.27 Ⅴ are typically reduced to their metallic states upon calcination in an inert atmosphere [46-48]. The N 1s peak of Ni-MOF appeared at 399.8 eV and could be assigned to the N of triethylenediamine coordinated with a metal ion [49]. Interestingly, this bonding energy was slightly higher than that of amino nitrogen (399.6 eV) owing to the influence of the magnetic metal center (i.e., Ni) [50, 51]. After thermolysis, the N 1s spectra of Ni@C-N-900-8h showed two new peaks at 398.9 and 401.0 eV, which could be assigned to pyridinic N and graphitic N, respectively [52]. This phenomenon was consistent with the TEM result (Fig. 6(c)) with respect to the formation of a graphitic structure.

Fig. 7. (a) Ni 2p and (b) N 1s XPS spectra of Ni-MOF and Ni@C-N-900-8h.

3.2 Catalytic oxidation of ethylbenzene over Ni@C-N

First, ethylbenzene oxidation was employed as a model reaction to evaluate the catalytic activities of the as-synthesized Ni@C-N materials. The catalytic reaction was conducted at 80 ℃ using TBHP as oxidant, and the results are summarized in Table 1. The blank reaction, without any catalyst, achieved minimal conversion performance only (Table 1, entry 1). In contrast, in the presence of the Ni@C-N materials, the oxidation transformation was efficiently promoted. The activity of the catalysts was strongly dependent on the pyrolysis temperature and time. Generally, the Ni@C-N materials prepared under higher MOF thermolysis temperatures showed higher activities (Table 1, entries 2-11), possibly because of the higher carbonization degree of the organic linkers in the MOF. In contrast, a longer pyrolysis time reduced the catalytic activity of the obtained Ni@C-N materials. Among the examined catalysts, Ni@C-N-900-8h displayed the best ethylbenzene oxidation performance (Table 1, entry 6), achieving an ethylbenzene-to-acetophenone conversion of 77% within 48 h of reaction at 80 ℃. Moreover, a higher yield of acetophenone could be achieved by simply increasing the amount of TBHP, while maintaining other conditions constant (Table 1, entry 12).

Table 1
Results of the oxidation of ethylbenzene catalyzed by different Ni@C-N catalysts.

Subsequently, the recyclability of Ni@C-N-900-8h catalyst toward ethylbenzene oxidation was examined. The results are presented in Table 1 (entries 6, 13-15); no significant decline in the conversion and selectivity performance was observed during repeated catalytic runs (up to four runs). These results demonstrate the high stability of the Ni@C-N catalyst under the investigated conditions.

3.3 Oxidation of different alkanes over Ni@C-N

To demonstrate the general applicability of the Ni@C-N catalysts, we extended the use of the present catalytic system (specifically, Ni@C-N-900-8h) to the oxidation transformations of various saturated alkanes under similar reaction conditions. The results are summarized in Table 2. As observed, the various secondary C-H bonds were oxidized smoothly with excellent selectivities to their corresponding partial oxidation products (Table 2, entries 1-5). For the oxidation of cyclohexane, a moderate conversion with 100% selectivity to cyclohexanone was achieved at 100 ℃ (Table 2, entry 5). Substituted ethylbenzene containing either electron-withdrawing or electron-donating functional groups also displayed excellent conversions and selectivities to the corresponding ketones (Table 2, entries 6-8). It was interesting to note that Ni@C-N was also highly active and selective toward the oxidation of 1, 4-diethylbenzene, achieving >95% selectivity to the diketone product (Table 3, entry 9). These results demonstrate the high versatility of the MOF-derived Ni@C-N catalysts prepared herein for the selective oxidation of alkanes.

Table 2
Oxidation of various alkanes catalyzed by Ni@C-N-900-8h.

4 Conclusions

We have developed novel, efficient, and cost-effective Ni-based catalysts for application in the selective oxidation of alkanes. The Ni@C-N materials were prepared by direct thermolysis of a Ni-containing MOF under inert atmosphere. The as-prepared Ni nanoparticles embedded in the C-N composites displayed high activity and selectivity in the oxidation of alkanes to their corresponding partial oxidation products under mild reaction conditions, thus showing a broad substrate scope for diverse saturated C-H bonds. Moreover, the catalysts are highly stable and maintain high activity and selectivity during numerous repeated catalytic cycles under the investigated conditions. The present strategy may be extended to the development of other novel metal-carbon composite catalysts for selective catalytic oxidation applications.

References
[1] R.A. Sheldon J. K. Kochi, Metal-Catalyzed Oxidations of Organic Compounds; Academic Press, New York,1981 :26–33.
[2] U. Schuchardt, W.A. Calvarlho E. V. Spinace, Synlett,1993, 10 :713–718.
[3] K. Kamata, K. Yonehara, Y. Nakagawa, K. Uehara N. Mizuno, Nat. Chem.,2010, 2 :478–483.
[4] R.G. Bergman, Nature,2007, 446 :391–393.
[5] K. Weissermel H. J. Arpe, Industrial Organic Chemistry, 2nd ed, VCH Press, Weinheim,1993 :.
[6] B.P.C. Hereijgers B. M. Weckhuysen, J. Catal.,2010, 270 :16–25.
[7] R. Zhao, J. Dong, G.M. Lu, G. Qian, L. Yan, X.L. Wang J. S. Suo, Chem. Commun.,2004 :904–905.
[8] L.X. Xu, C.H. He, M.Q. Zhu, K.J. Wu Y. L. Lai, Catal. Commun.,2008, 9 :816–820.
[9] P.P. Wu, P. Bai, K.P. Loh X. S. Zhao, Catal. Today,2010, 158 :220–227.
[10] L. Li, C. Jin, X.C. Wang, W.J. Ji, Y. Pan, T. van der Knaap, R. van der Stoel C. T. Au, Catal. Lett.,2009, 129 :303–311.
[11] Z.G. Sun, G. Li, L.P. Liu H. O. Liu, Catal. Commun.,2012, 27 :200–205.
[12] J. Li, Y. Shi, L. Xu G. Z. Lu, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.,2010, 49 :5392–5399.
[13] R. Raja, G. Sankar J. M. Thomas, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,1999, 121 :11926–11927.
[14] C. Chen, J. Xu, Q.H. Zhang, Y.F. Ma, L.P. Zhou M. Wang, Chem. Commun.,2011, 47 :1336–1338.
[15] H.X. Yuan, Q.H. Xia, H.J. Zhan, X.H. Lu K. X. Su, Appl. Catal. A,2006, 304 :178–184.
[16] X. Guo, D.H. Shen, Y.Y. Li, M. Tian, Q. Liu, C.C. Guo Z. G. Liu, J. Mol. Catal. A,2011, 351 :174–178.
[17] G. Qian, D. Ji, G.M. Lu, R. Zhao, Y.X. Qi J. G. Suo, J. Catal.,2005, 232 :378–386.
[18] X.X. Yang, H. Yu, F. Peng H. J. Wang, ChemSusChem,2012, 7 :1213–1217.
[19] J.L. Gu, Y. Huang, S.P. Elangovan, Y.S. Li, W.R. Zhao, I. Toshio, Y. Yamazaki J. L. Shi, J. Phys. Chem. C,2011, 115 :21211–21217.
[20] H. Zhao, J.C. Zhou, H. Luo, C.Y. Zeng, D.H. Li Y. J. Liu, Catal. Lett.,2006, 108 :49–54.
[21] R. Zhao, Y.Q. Wang, Y.L. Guo, X.H. Liu, Z.G. Zhang, Y.S. Wang, W.C. Zhan G. Z. Lu, Green Chem.,2006, 8 :459–466.
[22] J.L. Long, L.M. Wang, X.F. Gao, C.H. Bai, H.F. Jiang Y. W. Li, Chem. Commun.,2012, 48 :12109–12111.
[23] J.L. Long, H.L. Liu, S.J. Wu, S.J. Liao Y. W. Li, ACS Catal.,2013, 3 :647–654.
[24] H. Yu, F. Peng, J. Tan, X.W. Hu, H.J. Wang, J. Yang W. X. Zheng, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.,2011, 50 :3978–3982.
[25] X.H. Li, J.S. Chen, X.C. Wang, J. Sun M. Antonietti, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,2011, 133 :8074–8077.
[26] H.H. Zhao, H.L. Song, L.L. Xu L. J. Chou, Appl. Catal. A,2013, 456 :188–196.
[27] F. Zhang, C. Chen, W.M. Xiao, L. Xu N. Zhang, Catal. Commun.,2012, 26 :25–29.
[28] Y.F. Yang, L.T. Jia, B. Hou, D.B. Li, J.G. Wang Y. H. Sun, J. Phys. Chem. C,2014, 118 :268–277.
[29] W.X. Wang, Y.W. Li, R.J. Zhang, D.H. He, H.L. Liu S. J. Liao, Catal. Commun.,2011, 12 :875–879.
[30] R.Q. Fang, H.L. Liu, R. Luque Y. W. Li, Green Chem.,2015, 17 :4183–4188.
[31] K. Shen, L. Chen, J.L. Long, W. Zhong Y. W. Li, ACS Catal.,2015, 5 :5264–5271.
[32] X. Qiu, X. Wang, Y.W. Li, Chem. Commun.,2015, 51 :3874–3877.
[33] W. Zhong, H.L. Liu, C.H. Bai, S.J. Liao Y. W. Li., ACS Catal.,2015, 5 :1850–1858.
[34] X. Wang, W. Zhong Y. W. Li, Catal. Sci. Technol.,2015, 5 :1014–1017.
[35] J.L. Long, Y. Zhou Y. W. Li, Chem. Commun.,2015, 51 :2331–2134.
[36] C. Bai, X. Yao Y. W. Li, ACS Catal.,2015, 5 :884–891.
[37] A.J. Amali, J-K. Sun Q. Xu, Chem. Commun.,2014, 50 :1519–1522.
[38] W. Chaikittisilp, N.L. Torad, C.L. Li, M. Imura, N. Suzuki, S. Ishihara, K. Ariga Y. Yamauchi, Chem. Eur. J.,2014, 20 :4217–4221.
[39] T.K. Kim, K.J. Lee, J.Y. Cheon, J.H. Lee, S.H. Joo H. R. Moon, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,2013, 135 :8940–8946.
[40] H.L. Jiang, B. Liu, Y.Q. Lan, K. Kuratani, T. Akita, H. Shioyama, F.Q. Zong Q. Xu, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,2011, 133 :11854–11857.
[41] G. Srinivas, V. Krungleviciute, Z.X. Guo T. Yildirim, Energy Environ. Sci.,2014, 7 :335–342.
[42] J.Y. Lee, D.H. Olson, L. Pan, T.J. Emge J. Li, Adv. Funct. Mater.,2007, 17 :1225–1262.
[43] J.L. Long, B. Yin, Y.W. Li B. L. Zhang, AIChE J.,2014, 60 :3565–3576.
[44] Y.X. Yang, C. Ochoa-Hernández, P. Pizarro, V.A. de la P O'Shea, J.M. Coronado D P. Serrano, Fuel,,2015, 144 :60–70.
[45] M.C. Biesingera, B.P. Payne, A.P. Grosvenor, L.W.M. Lau, A.R. Gerson R. S. C. Smart, Appl. Surf. Sci.,2011, 257 :2717–2730.
[46] F. Severino, J.L. Brito, J. Laine, J.L. G Fierro A. L. Agudo, J. Catal.,1998, 177 :82–95.
[47] P. Liu E. J. M. Hensen, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,2013, 135 :14032–14035.
[48] J.M.L. Martínez, E. Rodríguez-Castellón, R.M.T. Sánchez, L.R. Denaday, G.Y. Buldain V. C. Dall' Orto, J. Mol. Catal. A,2011, 339 :43–51.
[49] F.G. Souza, P. Richa, A. de Siervo, G.E. Oliveira, C.H.M. Rodrigues, M. Nele J. C. Pinto, Macromol. Mater. Eng.,2008, 293 :675–683.
[50] J.S. Stevens, S.J. Byard, C.A. Muryn S. L. M. Schroeder, J. Phys. Chem. B,2010, 114 :13961–13969.
[51] M. Shibata, Y. Kimura D. Yaginuma, Polymer,2004, 45 :7571–7577.
[52] X.L. Li, H.L. Wang, J.T. Robinson, H. Sanchez, G. Diankov H. J. Dai, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,2009, 131 :15939–15944.