催化学报  2016, Vol. 37 Issue (6): 971-978   PDF (21885 678KB)    
扩展功能
加入收藏夹
复制引文信息
加入引用管理器
Email Alert
RSS
本文作者相关文章
Zhang Ming
Zhu Wenshuai
Li Hongping
Xun Suhang
Li Meng
Li Yanan
Wei Yanchen
Li Huaming
Fabrication and characterization of tungsten-containing mesoporous silica for heterogeneous oxidative desulfurization
Zhang Minga, Zhu Wenshuaib, Li Hongpingb, Xun Suhangb, Li Mengb, Li Yananb, Wei Yanchenb, Li Huaminga,b     
a. Institute for Energy Research, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, Jiangsu, China ;
b. School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, Jiangsu, China
Foundation Item: This work was supported by the National Nature Science Foundation of China (21276117, 21376111, 21406092).
* Corresponding author. Tel: +86‐511‐88791800; Fax: +86‐511‐88791708; E‐mail: zhuws@ujs.edu.cn Tel: +86‐511‐88791800; Fax: +86‐511‐88791708; E‐mail: lhm@ujs.edu.cn
Abstract: A series of functional, tungsten-containing mesoporous silica materials (W-SiO2) have been fabricated directly from an ionic liquid that contained imidazole and polyoxometalate, which acted as mesoporous template and metal source respectively. These materials were then characterized through X-ray diffraction (XRD), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), Raman spectroscopy, Fourier transform infrared spectra (FTIR), diffuse reflectance spectra (DRS), and N2 adsorption-desorption, which were found to contain tungsten species that were effectively dispersed throughout the structure. The as-prepared materials W-SiO2 were also found to possess a mesoporous structure. The pore diameters of the respective sample W-SiO2-20 determined from the TEM images ranged from 2 to 4 nm, which was close to the average pore size determined from the nitrogen desorption isotherm (2.9 nm). The materials were evaluated as catalysts for the heterogeneous oxidative desulfurization of dibenzothiophene (DBT), which is able to achieve deep desulfurization within 40 min under the optimal conditions (Catalyst (W-SiO2-20) = 0.01 g, temperature = 60 ℃, oxidant (H2O2) = 20 μL). For the removal of different organic sulfur compounds within oil, the ability of the catalyst (W-SiO2-20) under the same conditions to remove sulfur compounds decreased in the order: 4,6-dimethyldibenzothiophene > Dibenzothiophene > Benzothiophene > 1-dodecanethiol. Additionally, they did not require organic solvents as an extractant in the heterogeneous oxidative desulfurization process. After seven separate catalytic cycles, the desulfurization efficiency was still as high as 90.3%. From the gas chromatography-mass spectrometer analysis, DBT was entirely oxidized to its corresponding sulfone DBTO2 after reaction. A mechanism for the heterogeneous desulfurization reaction was proposed.
© 2016, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Key words: Heterogeneous oxidative     desulfurization     Tungsten species     Mesoporous silica     One-pot synthesis     Organosulfur    
功能化含钨介孔硅材料的直接合成表征及其在多相氧化脱硫中的应用
张铭a, 朱文帅b, 李宏平b, 荀苏杭b, 李猛b, 李亚男b, 魏延臣b, 李华明a,b     
a. 江苏大学能源研究院, 江苏 镇江 212013 ;
b. 江苏大学化学化工学院, 江苏 镇江 212013
摘要:温和条件下, 燃油深度脱硫一直是非常重要的研究课题. 目前, 加氢脱硫 (HDS) 是石油工业上广泛采用的脱硫技术, 它能够有效脱除燃油中的硫醚、硫醇和等无机硫化物, 但对于芳香族硫化物 (如二苯并噻吩、4,6-二甲基二苯并噻吩等), 则效果较差. 对于上述有机硫化物的深度脱除, 现有的加氢脱硫技术需要更为苛刻的反应条件, 如高温、高压、高活性贵金属催化剂等, 这势必导致燃油成本的大幅上升. 因此, 世界各国科学家都加强了高效非加氢脱硫方法的研究, 主要包括氧化脱硫法、吸附脱硫法、萃取脱硫法和生物脱硫法等, 其中氧化脱硫法是一种公认的具有应用前景的高效脱硫技术, 该技术只需在常温常压下进行, 可将含硫化合物氧化成其相应的砜类物质后, 再用溶剂萃取法或吸附法除去. 氧化脱硫反应中所涉及氧化剂有过氧化氢、有机过氧化物和氧气等. 在这些氧化剂中, 过氧化氢由于其活性高, 在氧化反应后的副产物只有水, 而被广泛研究. 离子液体作为一种低温熔融盐, 因其独特的理化性质, 如无蒸气压、低毒性、良好的溶解性以及结构可调等, 受到了广泛的关注. 其中, 功能化多酸基离子液体不仅具备离子液体的特点, 还具备多金属氧酸盐的优势, 已被用于燃油的均相氧化脱硫过程中. 但是, 此过程中离子液体往往用量较大, 催化剂难于回收和循环利用, 氧化剂用量较大, 阻碍其在工业中的应用. 为了克服上述缺点, 本课题组以多酸基离子液体[C16mim]3PW12O40 和正硅酸四乙酯为原料通过溶胶-凝胶法直接合成了一系列含钨功能化介孔复合材料 W-SiO2, 其中咪唑型阳离子作为介孔模板剂, 而多酸阴离子作为金属源. 采用 XRD, IR, Raman, BET, DRS, TEM 等测试手段对所合成的材料进行了表征. 结果表明, 钨活性物种是以氧化钨的形式存在, 并且能够均匀地分散在载体二氧化硅上, 所合成的材料比表面积为 513-743 m2/g, 孔体积为 0.37-0.50 cm3/g, 孔径为 2.91-3.20 nm. 将所合成的材料 W-SiO2-20 应用于燃油氧化脱硫反应 (过程中无需有机溶剂), 结果表明, 所合成的复合材料既能作为吸附剂来吸附有机硫化物, 又能作为催化剂来活化过氧化氢以氧化有机硫化物. 在最优条件 (反应温度 60 oC, O/S 摩尔比为 2.5, 反应时间 40 min) 下, 二苯并噻吩脱除率可 100%, 而且反应体系易于循环使用, 7 次循环后脱硫率无明显降低. 此外, 还考察了复合材料在相同条件下对于不同硫化物的脱除效果, 结果表明, 反应活性顺序为 4,6-DMDBT > DBT > BT > DT.
关键词多相氧化脱硫     氧化钨     介孔二氧化硅     一锅法合成     有机硫化物    
1 Introduction

As the worldwide demand for fuel continues to increase rapidly, the industrial desulfurization of diesel fuel faces increasing technological challenges to comply with environmental concerns and legal requirements [1, 2].

Hydrodesulfurization (HDS) is a mature technology and efficiently removes aliphatic and acyclic sulfur compounds (e.g. thiols, sulfides, and disulfides) [3-5] but not thiophene sulfides, such as dibenzothiophene and its derivatives [6-8]. Additionally, further improvements to the HDS process for deep desulfurization are limited to increasingly harsh operating conditions with high associated costs [9, 10]. Hence, it is critical to develop supplementary strategies for deep desulfurization, including extraction [11-14], adsorption [15, 16], oxidation [17-22], and biodesulfurization [23]. Oxidative desulfurization (ODS) can remove aromatic organosulfur compounds under mild conditions. As such, it is considered as a promising technique for deep desulfurization.

Ionic liquids (ILs) are organic salts with low melting points and vapor pressures, and have attracted wide attention owing to their unique physicochemical properties, including negligible volatility, low toxicity, excellent thermal stability, good solubility characteristics, and the variety of available structures [24]. Task-specific IL anions that are tethered to functional groups (e.g. polyoxometalates) show great potential for the modification and control of different chemical and physical functions in a material [25-27]. Polyoxometalates (POMs) are a vast class of well-defined, early transition metal oxyanion clusters that exhibit distinctive physicochemical properties, including adjustability of composition, size, shape, acid-base properties, and redox potential [28-32]. As such, POMs are extensively used as green catalysts, particularly in oxidation reactions [33, 34]. A number of studies have demonstrated that POM-based ILs exhibited efficient catalytic ODS [35-37]. However, the widespread use of these materials for homogeneous desulfurization in an industrial setting has been hindered because of their intrinsic liquid nature and high viscosity, which leads to difficulties in separation and recovery, recyclability, cost, and the large amounts of ILs that are required [38].

To overcome some of these problems, considerable efforts have been made to introduce active POM-based species into heterogeneous desulfurization systems, where materials such as zeolites, porous carbon, clays, siliceous materials, and metal-organic frameworks were employed as a support [39-44]. Among these supports, mesoporous silica possesses a number of desirable properties, including a stable mesoporous structure, a large surface area and pore volume, well-ordered pore structure, and narrow pore-size distributions. Moreover, silica has no inherent catalytic property and can be used as a support that can be functionalized by framework substitution or post-synthesis surface modification. As such, POM-based IL-supported mesoporous silica has been fabricated for ODS, but required relatively excessive oxidants. Additionally, the requirement for organic solvents (e.g. acetonitrile and dimethylformamide) may limit future applications of these materials [45, 46].

In this work, active tungsten species were introduced directly into mesoporous silica from a POM-based IL ([C16mim]3PW12O40), where the imidazole cation and polyoxometalate anion acted as template and metal source, respectively. The hybrid materials (W-SiO2) were highly effective on removing organosulfur compounds under mild conditions and were separated easily for recycling. Additionally, organic solvents were not required for the heterogeneous desulfurization. All samples were characterized using X-ray diffraction, Transmission electron microscopy, Raman spectroscopy, Fourier transform infrared spectra, Diffuse reflectance spectra, and Brunauer-Emmett-Teller analysis.

2 Experimental
2.1 Materials

H2O2 (aqueous solution, 30 wt%), H3PW12O40·14H2O (AR grade), WO3 (AR grade), n-octane (AR grade), NH3·H2O (aqueous solution, 25 wt%), acetonitrile (AR grade), tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS, AR grade) and tetradecane (AR grade) were purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. Benzothiophene (BT, 99%), dibenzothiophene (DBT, 98%) 1-dodecanethiol (DT, 99%), and 4, 6-dimethyldibenzothiophene (4, 6-DMDBT, 99%) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. [C16mim]Br was purchased from Shanghai Chengjie Chemical Co., Ltd. All the materials are used without further purification.

2.2 Sample preparation

The POM-based IL [C16mim]3PW12O40 was prepared according to a literature procedure [47]. The mesoporous hybrid material (W-SiO2) was prepared using a one-pot method from an initial gel that consisted of TEOS:[C16mim]3PW12O40:H2O: NH3·H2O = 1:x:160:1.5 (x = 0.002, 0.004, 0.008). In a typical synthesis, [C16mim]3PW12O40 (0.14 g) was added into acetonitrile (4 mL) with constant stirring. Subsequently, TEOS (2 mL) and NH3·H2O (0.52 mL) were added into the mixture and stirred for 3 h. The resulting gel was filtered, washed with water (200 mL), dried overnight at 120 ℃, and then calcined at 550 ℃ with a heating rate of 5 ℃/min for 6 h. The samples were named based on the Si/W molar ratio used in the gel (W-SiO2-y, where y = Si/W = 10, 20 and 40).

2.3 Characterization and methods

The samples were ground into a fine powder for characterization. Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectra were recorded with a Nicolet Nexus 470 FT-IR instrument using KBr pellets. Raman spectroscopy was recorded at ambient temperature using a DXR Raman microscope with an excitation wavelength of 532 nm from a laser source. Diffuse reflectance spectra (DRS) were measured between 200 and 800 nm with BaSO4 used as the reflectance standard using a UV-visible spectrometer (UV-2450, Shimadzu). The surface area of the samples was calculated using the Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) method, while the pore-size distribution was obtained from the adsorption branches of the isotherms using the Barrett-Joyner- Halenda (BJH) method. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was recorded using a JEOL-JEM-2010 (JEOL, Japan) operated at 200 kV. The crystalline phases within the samples were analyzed using X-ray diffraction (XRD) spectroscopy with a Bruker D8 diffractometer with Cu Kα radiation (λ = 0.154 nm).

2.4 Catalytic activity test

A model oil sample was prepared by dissolving DBT, BT, DT and 4, 6-DMDBT in n-octane with a corresponding sulfur content of 500, 250, 250 and 250 ppm, respectively. Desulfurization was performed in a flask equipped with a magnetic stirrer and condenser. In a typical run, a water bath was initially heated to 60 ℃ then allowed to stabilize. W-SiO2 (0.01 g) and H2O2 (20 μL) were added to the reactor and then the oil (5 mL) was injected.

2.5 Analysis method of products

The sulfur contents in the oil after the desulfurization test were analyzed using gas chromatography-flame ionization detector (GC-FID) with tetradecane as the internal standard (Agilent 7890A; HP-5, 30 m × 0.32 mm × 0.25 μm; FID: Agilent). The conversion of the sulfur compounds in the oil was used to calculate the removal of sulfur compounds.

The oxidized sulfur compounds were characterized using gas chromatography-mass spectrometer (GC-MS, Agilent 7890/ 5975C-GC/MSD; HP-5 MS column, 30 m × 250 μm × 0.25 μm; temperature program: 100 ℃ → temperature rising 15 ℃/min → 200 ℃ for 10 min).

3 Results and discussion
3.1 Characterization of the catalysts

FT-IR spectra of W-SiO2-y, WO3 and [C16mim]3PW12O40 are shown in Fig. 1. The spectrum of bulk WO3 (Fig. 1(1)) exhibited a strong and broad peak at approximately 820 cm−1 that was caused by the stretching vibrations of W-O-W. In addition to the C-H stretching vibrations of the alkyl chain (2950 to 2850 cm−1), [C16mim]3PW12O40 (Fig. 1(2)) exhibited four bands that were characteristic of Keggin units (νas(P-Oa) = 1080 cm−1, νas(W=Ot) = 978 cm−1, νas(W-Oc-W) = 898 cm−1 and νas(W-Oe-W) = 808 cm−1). The W-SiO2-y materials (Fig. 1(3)-(5)) exhibited a broad peak near 3500 cm−1 that was attributed to surface silanols and adsorbed water molecules [48]. The three peaks located at 1086, 812, and 460 cm−1 were caused by asymmetric νasym(Si-O-Si), symmetric νsym(Si-O-Si) and bending modes of the SiO4 tetrahedra vibrations within the silica, respectively [49, 50]. The band near 954 cm−1 in the W-SiO2-y materials was characteristic of Si-O-W bonds, which indicated that tungsten species were incorporated into the framework of the mesoporous silica matrix [51].

Fig. 1. FT-IR spectra of (1) WO3, (2) [C16mim]3PW12O40, (3) W-SiO2-10, (4) W-SiO2-20, and (5) W-SiO2-40.

The electronic behavior of the materials was examined using UV-vis DRS, as shown in Fig. 2. The spectrum of [C16mim]3PW12O40 exhibited an absorption band at approximately 212 nm that was assigned to an O-P transition, while the absorption peak located at 260 nm was ascribed to a charge transfer transition within the Keggin units. Bulk WO3 exhibited a strong absorption near 430 nm that was assigned to a ligand-to-metal charge transfer (O2−-W6+) [52]. After the introduction of the tungsten species into the silica matrix, two ligand-to-metal charge transfer bands were observed near 202 and 267 nm (O2s-W5d-O2p). The absorption onset of the W-SiO2-y materials was shifted to a lower wavelength by approximately 100 nm when compared with bulk WO3, which indicated that the tungsten species were incorporated into the silica matrix [53].

Fig. 2. UV-vis diffuse reflectance spectra of (1) WO3, (2) [C16mim]3PW12O40, (3) W-SiO2-10, (4) W-SiO2-20, and (5) W-SiO2-40.

To examine the structure of the tungsten species that were incorporated into the hybrid materials, Raman scattering spectroscopy was used (Fig. 3). Bulk WO3 (Fig. 3(1)) exhibited a series of characteristic peaks in the regions 1000-600 cm−1 and 600-150 cm−1 that were assigned to W-O stretching and bending vibrations, respectively [54]. These bands were also observed in the W-SiO2-y materials (Fig. 3(2)-(4)) and as the tungsten content increased, the bands became more intense and well defined. These results indicated that the tungsten species in the hybrid materials were tungsten oxide.

Fig. 3. Raman spectra of (1) WO3, (2) W-SiO2-10, (3) W-SiO2-20, and (4) W-SiO2-40.

XRD pattern was performed to analyze the composition and phase structure of the W-SiO2-y materials (Fig. 4). Small angle XRD patterns of the samples exhibited a broad diffraction peak that was located at approximately 2θ = 2.2°, which is a feature of mesoporous materials (Fig. 4(a)). However, the wide-angle XRD patterns exhibited a broad peak that was consistent with amorphous silica walls (Fig. 4(b)). The diffraction peaks of crystalline WO3 were not obvious, even in the W-SiO2 sample that had a relatively high tungsten content (Si/W = 10), which indicated that the tungsten species were effectively dispersed throughout the silica matrix.

Fig. 4. (a) Low-angle and (b) wide-angle XRD patterns of (1) W-SiO2-10, (2) W-SiO2-20, and (3) W-SiO2-40.

Nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherms and the BJH pore-size distribution curves are shown in Fig. 5. The nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherms of all samples were assigned according to the IUPAC classification as Type IV, which is characteristic of a mesostructure in W-SiO2 materials (Fig. 5(a)). Typical unimodal pore-size distribution curves with pore diameters that ranged between 2 and 5 nm indicated the uniform mesoporosity of the hybrid materials (Fig. 5(b)). The textural properties of the samples are listed in Table 1. The W-SiO2-40 sample had a surface area of 743 m2/g, a pore volume of 0.50 cm3/g, and a pore size of 3.20 nm. As the tungsten content within the samples increased, the BET surface area, pore volume and pore size decreased. This effect has been reported to be caused by the anchoring of tungsten species in the pore walls [55], which was confirmed by the results of the low-angle XRD analysis.

Fig. 5. (a) Nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherms and (b) pore-size distribution of (1) W-SiO2-10, (2) W-SiO2-20, and (3) W-SiO2-40.

Table 1
Textural properties of W-SiO2-10, W-SiO2-20, and W-SiO2-40.

TEM was used to investigate the structural features of the representative sample. TEM images of W-SiO2-20 exhibited numerous interconnected worm-like mesoporous structures with a disordered arrangement (Fig. 6). The pore diameters determined from the TEM images ranged from 2 to 4 nm, which was close to the average pore size determined from the nitrogen desorption isotherm (2.9 nm). The TEM images also confirmed the low-angle XRD results and textural properties listed in Table 1.

Fig. 6. TEM images of the W-SiO2-20 sample.

3.2 Catalytic performance of the samples

The removal of DBT from the sample oil by the W-SiO2-y materials under identical conditions is shown in Fig. 7. Both W-SiO2-10 and W-SiO2-20achieved deep desulfurization within 40 min. Importantly, W-SiO2-20 catalyzed the complete removal of DBT in 30 min, which was higher than either W-SiO2-10 or W-SiO2-40 (97.7% and 69.4%, respectively). This may have been because W-SiO2-20 possessed a larger BET surface area and pore volume compared with W-SiO2-10, and more active sites (tungsten species) compared with W-SiO2-40. The adsorption desulfurization of DBT was also investigated without the presence of H2O2 (catalyst = 0.01 g, T = 60 ℃, t = 40 min). This experiment yielded adsorption desulfurization values of 6.9%, 5.6%, and 4.7%, which corresponded to calculated adsorptive capacities of 17.2, 14.0, and 11.7 mg/g for W-SiO2-40, W-SiO2-20, and W-SiO2-10, respectively.

Fig. 7. Removal of DBT from the sample oil using (1) W-SiO2-10, (2) W-SiO2-20, and (3) W-SiO2-40. Reaction conditions: catalyst = 0.01 g, O/S = 2.5, T = 60 ℃.

The identity of a sulfur-containing compound can influence the ability of a catalyst to remove sulfur. The effectiveness of W-SiO2-20 for the removal of a series of organosulfur compounds was studied. In addition to DBT, the compounds BT, 4, 6-DMDBT and DT were examined (Fig. 8). The removal of sulfur reached equilibrium after approximately 30 min except for 4, 6-DMDBT, which took 20 min. The levels of sulfur removal from the oil after 20 min for BT, DBT, DT and 4, 6-DMDBT were 84.4%, 90.4%, 75.0% and 100.0% , respectively. Thus, the ability of W-SiO2-20 to remove sulfur decreased in the order 4, 6-DMDBT > DBT > BT > DT. This decrease in ability to remove sulfur corresponded to the decrease in sulfur electron density of the aromatic compounds (4, 6-DMDBT (5.760) > DBT (5.758) > BT (5.739)) [56]. However, the sulfur removal of DT was the lowest, which was attributed to the strong steric hindrance of the long carbon chains.

Fig. 8. Removal of various sulfur-containing compounds during desulfurization. Reaction conditions: catalyst (W-SiO2-20) = 0.01 g, O/S = 2.5, T = 60 ℃.

The ability of the catalyst to be recycled was investigated. After the first reaction, the upper oil phase was separated by decanting from the reactor. The remaining catalyst within the reactor was dried at 60 ℃ overnight, and then fresh H2O2 and model oil were added to the reactor for the next cycle. The ability of the catalyst to remove sulfur from the reaction system was able to reach 90.3% after recycling seven times, as shown in Fig. 9.

Fig. 9. Recycling ability of the catalyst. Reaction conditions: catalyst (W-SiO2-20) = 0.01 g, O/S = 2.5, T = 60 ℃, t = 40 min.

The oxidation products of DBT were determined using GC-MS analysis after reaction (Fig. 10). The upper oil layer was decanted, and the used catalyst was extracted using carbon tetrachloride for the GC-MS analysis. A single, intense peak at 3.4 min was ascribed to n-tetradecane, which indicated that DBT was completely removed from the oil phase (Fig. 10(a)). The GC trace for the extracted catalyst only exhibited an obvious peak at 9.8 min, which corresponded to DBTO2 (Fig. 10(b), inset). The fact that a peak for DBT was not detected demonstrated that it was entirely oxidized to DBTO2 in the desulfurization process.

Fig. 10. (a) GC analysis of the upper oil after reaction and (b) GC-MS analysis of sulfur compounds in the catalyst after reaction.

3.3 Proposed mechanism of the reaction

A potential mechanism for the desulfurization process using the W-SiO2 catalysts is shown in Fig. 11. Initially, DBT is absorbed by W-SiO2 and is oxidized by the active peroxo species, which are formed by the reaction of the tungsten species and H2O2. The sulfone species that is subsequently formed (DBTO2) can also be absorbed by W-SiO2. As the reaction proceeds, the peroxo species transformed to tungsten species, which could continually combine with H2O2 [57].

Fig. 11. Oxidative desulfurization procedure of DBT in the presence of mesoporous W-SiO2 as catalyst.

4 Conclusions

In summary, a series of mesoporous materials (W-SiO2) were synthesized using a one-pot method from a POM-based IL. These materials contained tungsten species that were effectively dispersed throughout the silica matrix. The hybrid catalysts exhibited excellent activity for the removal of a number of different sulfur-containing compounds from a model oil, with low amounts of co-oxidant (O/S molar ratio = 2.5) in approximately 40 min. This process did not require the addition of organic solvents as an extractant. The ability of the catalysts to remove sulfur compounds decreased in the order: 4, 6-DMDBT > DBT > BT > DT. Importantly, the catalyst could be recycled up to seven times without any significant decrease in activity.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to acknowledge the financial support provided by Advanced Talents of Jiangsu University (13JDG080), Postdoctoral Foundation of China (2014M551516), and A Project Funded by the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD).

References
[1] J. Eβer, P. Wasserscheid, A. Jess, Green Chem. ,2004, 6 :316–322.
[2] H. W. Zheng, Z. Sun, X. L. Chen, Q. Zhao, X. H. Wang, Z.J. Jiang, Appl. Catal. A,2013, 467 :26–32.
[3] I. V. Babich, J.A. Moulijn, Fuel,2003, 82 :607–631.
[4] H. P. Li, W. S. Zhu, S. W. Zhu, J. X. Xia, Y. H. Chang, W. Jiang, M. Zhang, Y. W. Zhou, H.M. Li, AIChE J. ,2016, 62 :2087–2100.
[5] W. S. Zhu, B. L. Dai, P. W. Wu, Y. H. Chao, J. Xiong, S. H. Xun, H. P. Li, H.M. Li, ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. ,2015, 3 :186–194.
[6] L. F. Ramirez-Verduzco, E. Torres-Garcia, R. Gomez-Quintana, V. Gonzalez-Pena, F. Murrieta-Guevara, Catal. Today,2004, 98 :289–294.
[7] C. S. Song, X.L. Ma, Appl. Catal. B,2003, 41 :207–238.
[8] M. Zhang, W. S. Zhu, H. M. Li, S. H. Xun, W. J. Ding, J. J. Liu, Z. Zhao, Q. Wang, Chem. Eng. J. ,2014, 243 :386–393.
[9] N. F. Nejad, E. Shams, M. K. Amini, J.C. Bennett, Fuel Process. Technol. ,2013, 106 :376–384.
[10] J. Xiao, L. M. Wu, Y. Wu, B. Liu, L. Dai, Z. Li, Q. B. Xia, H.X. Xi, Appl. Energy,2014, 113 :78–85.
[11] A. Bosmann, L. Datsevich, A. Jess, A. Lauter, C. Schmitz, P. Wasserscheid, Chem. Commun. ,2001 :2494.
[12] N. H. Ko, J. S. Lee, E. S. Huh, H. Lee, K. D. Jung, H. S. Kim, M. Cheong, Energy Fuels,2008, 22 :1687–1690.
[13] C. Asumana, G. R. Yu, X. Li, J. J. Zhao, G. Liu, X.C. Chen, Green Chem. ,2010, 12 :2030–2037.
[14] F. T. Li, Y. Liu, Z. M. Sun, L. J. Chen, D. S. Zhao, R. H. Liu, C.G. Kou, Energy Fuels,2010, 24 :4285–4289.
[15] J. M. Kwon, J. H. Moon, Y. S. Bae, D. G. Lee, H. C. Sohn, C.H. Lee, ChemSusChem,2008, 1 :307–309.
[16] A. Srivastav, V.C. Srivastava, J. Hazard. Mater. ,2009, 170 :1133–1140.
[17] F. T. Li, Y. Liu, Z. M. Sun, Y. Zhao, R. H. Liu, L. J. Chen, D.S. Zhao, Catal. Sci. Technol. ,2012, 2 :1455–1462.
[18] T. W. Kim, M. J. Kim, F. Kleitz, M. M. Nair, R. Guillet-Nicolas, K. E. Jeong, H. J. Chae, C. U. Kim, S.Y. Jeong, ChemCatChem,2012, 4 :687–697.
[19] M. Zhang, W. S. Zhu, S. H. Xun, H. M. Li, Q. Q. Gu, Z. Zhao, Q. Wang, Chem. Eng. J. ,2013, 220 :328–336.
[20] X. M. Yan, P. Mei, J. H. Lei, Y. Z. Mi, L. Xiong, L.P. Guo, J. Mol. Catal. A,2009, 304 :52–57.
[21] X. Y. Shi, M. Sun, J. Fan, P. M. Wang, W. J. Ma, J.F. Wei, Appl. Organomet. Chem. ,2015, 29 :633–637.
[22] N. F. Tang, X. P. Zhao, Z. X. Jiang, C. Li, Chin. J. Catal. ,2014, 35 :1433–1437.
[23] Y. G. Li, W. L. Li, H. S. Gao, J. M. Xing, H.Z. Liu, J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. ,2011, 86 :246–250.
[24] A. Imtiaz, A. Waqas, I. Muhammad, Chin. J. Catal. ,2013, 34 :1839–1847.
[25] W. Lu, A. G. Fadeev, B. H. Qi, E. Smela, B. R. Mattes, J. Ding, G. M. Spinks, J. Mazurkiewicz, D. Z. Zhou, G. G. Wallace, D. R. MacFarlane, S. A. Forsyth, M. Forsyth, Science,2002, 297 :983–987.
[26] R, Giernoth, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. ,2010, 49 :2834–2839.
[27] H, Weingaertner, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. ,2008, 47 :654–670.
[28] C. L. Hill, C.M. Prosser-McCartha, Coord. Chem. Rev. ,1995, 143 :407–455.
[29] Y. X. Qiao, Z.S. Hou, Curr. Org. Chem. ,2009, 13 :1347–1365.
[30] J. Hu, R.C. Burns, J. Mol. Catal. A,2002, 184 :451–464.
[31] E. Assady, B. Yadollahi, M. R. Farsani, M. Moghadam, Appl. Organomet. Chem. ,2015, 29 :561–565.
[32] E. Rafiee, N. Rahpeyma, Chin. J. Catal. ,2015, 36 :1342–1349.
[33] R. Wang, F. L. Yu, G. F. Zhang, H.X. Zhao, Catal. Today,2010, 150 :37–41.
[34] J. H. Xu, S. Zhao, W. Chen, M. Wang, Y.F. Song, Chem. Eur. J. ,2012, 18 :4775–4781.
[35] H. Y. Lu, J. B. Gao, Z. X. Jiang, F. Jing, Y. X. Yano, G. Wang, C. Li, J. Catal. ,2006, 239 :369–375.
[36] C. Li, Z. X. Jiang, J. B. Gao, Y. X. Yang, S. J. Wang, F. P. Tian, F. X. Sun, X. P. Sun, P. L. Ying, C.R. Han, Chem. Eur. J. ,2004, 10 :2277–2280.
[37] H. Y. Lu, J. B. Gao, Z. X. Jiang, Y. X. Yang, B. Song, C. Li, Chem. Commun. ,2007 :150.
[38] G. J. Wang, N. Y. Yu, L. Peng, R. Tan, H. H. Zhao, D. H. Yin, H. Y. Qiu, Z. H. Fu, D.L. Yin, Catal. Lett. ,2008, 123 :252–258.
[39] P. P. Zhao, M. J. Zhang, Y. J. Wu, J. Wang, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. ,2012, 51 :6641–6647.
[40] E. Rafiee, S. Eavani, J. Mol. Catal. A,2013, 380 :18–27.
[41] S. Ribeiro, A. D.S. Barbosa, A. C. Gomes, M. Pillinger, I. S. Gonçalves, L. Cunha-Silva, S.S. Balula, Fuel Process. Technol. ,2013, 116 :350–357.
[42] X. J. He, N. Zhao, J. S. Qiu, N. Xiao, M. X. Yu, C. Yu, X. Y. Zhang, M.D. Zheng, J. Mater. Chem. A,2013, 1 :9440–9448.
[43] J. X. Wu, Y. L. Gao, W. Zhang, Y. Y. Tan, A. M. Tang, Y. Men, B. Tang, Appl. Organomet. Chem. ,2015, 29 :96–100.
[44] D. Xie, Q. H. He, Y. Y. Su, T. W. Wang, R. F. Xu, B.X. Hu, Chin. J. Catal. ,2015, 36 :1205–1213.
[45] Z. E.A. Abdalla, B.S. Li, Chem. Eng. J. ,2012 :200.
[46] J. Zhang, A. J. Wang, X. Li, X.H. Ma, J. Catal. ,2011, 279 :269–275.
[47] T. Rajkumar, G.R. Rao, J. Chem. Sci. ,2008, 120 :587–594.
[48] D. Rath, S. Rana, K.M. Parida, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. ,2010, 49 :8942–8948.
[49] R. Nava, A. Infantes-Molina, P. Castano, R. Guil-Lopez, B. Pawelec, Fuel,2011, 90 :2726–2737.
[50] B. Pawelec, S. Damyanova, R. Mariscal, J. L.G. Fierro, I. Sobrados, J. Sanz, L. Petrov, J. Catal. ,2004, 223 :86–97.
[51] H. Chen, W. L. Dai, J. F. Deng, K.N. Fan, Catal. Lett. ,2002, 81 :131–136.
[52] X. L. Yang, W. L. Dai, R. H. Gao, K.N. Fan, J. Catal. ,2007, 249 :278–288.
[53] R. H. Gao, X. L. Yang, W. L. Dai, Y. Y. Le, H. X. Li, K.N. Fan, J. Catal. ,2008, 256 :259–267.
[54] D. E. Diaz-Droguett, R. El Far, V. M. Fuenzalida, A.L. Cabrera, Mater. Chem. Phys. ,2012, 134 :631–638.
[55] Z. E.A. Abdalla, B. S. Li, A. Tufail, Colloids Surf. A,2009, 341 :86–92.
[56] D. Xu, W. S. Zhu, H. M. Li, J. T. Zhang, F. Zou, H. Shi, Y.S. Yan, Energy Fuels,2009, 23 :5929–5933.
[57] W. S. Zhu, H. M. Li, X. Jiang, Y. S. Yan, J. D. Lu, L. N. He, J.X. Xia, Green Chem. ,2008, 10 :641–646.