催化学报  2016, Vol. 37 Issue (11): 2025-2033   PDF    
扩展功能
加入收藏夹
复制引文信息
加入引用管理器
Email Alert
RSS
本文作者相关文章
Wang Hui-Long
Qi Hui-Ping
Wei Xiao-Na
Liu Xiao-Yu
Jiang Wen-Feng
Photocatalytic activity of TiO2 supported SiO2-Al2O3 aerogels prepared from industrial fly ash
Wang Hui-Longa, Qi Hui-Pinga, Wei Xiao-Naa, Liu Xiao-Yub, Jiang Wen-Fenga     
a. Department of Chemistry, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China ;
b. Experimental Center of Chemistry, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China
Foundation Item: This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21377018), the Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province of China (2013020116) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (DUT15ZD240)
* Corresponding author. Tel: +86-411-84708941; Fax: +86-411-84708590; E-mail: dlutjiangwf@163.com
Abstract: A ternary composite of TiO2 and a SiO2-Al2O3 aerogel with good photocatalytic activity was prepared by a simple sol-gel method with TiO2 nanoparticles and SiO2-Al2O3 aerogels derived from industrial fly ash. The structural features of the TiO2/SiO2-Al2O3 aerogel composite were investigated by X-ray powder diffraction, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, transmission electron microscopy, gas adsorption measurements and diffuse reflectance UV-visible spectroscopy. The optimal conditions for photocatalytic degradation of 2-sec-butyl-4,6-dinitrophenol (DNBP), included an initial DNBP concentration of 0.167 mmol/L at pH = 4.86 with a catalyst concentration of 6 g/L, under visible light irradiation for 5 h. A plausible mechanism is proposed for the photocatalytic degradation of DNBP. Our composite showed higher photocatalytic activity for DNBP degradation than that of pure TiO2. This indicates that this material can serve as an efficient photocatalyst for degradation of hazardous organic pollutants in wastewater.
© 2016, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Key words: Titania     SiO2-Al2O3 aerogel     Composite photocatalyst     Industrial fly ash     2-sec-butyl-4,6-dinitrophenol     Wastewater treatment    
以工业粉煤灰为原料制备 TiO2/SiO2-Al2O3 气凝胶三元复合光催化剂及其催化性能
王慧龙a, 齐慧萍a, 魏晓娜a, 刘潇彧b, 姜文凤a     
a. 大连理工大学化学学院, 辽宁 大连 116024 ;
b. 大连理工大学基础化学实验中心, 辽宁 大连 116024
摘要:2-仲丁基-4,6-二硝基苯酚(DNBP)作为杀虫剂、除草剂和烯烃基芳香族化合物阻聚剂而被广泛地应用于工农业生产中.在DNBP生产和使用过程中,会产生大量难以降解的有机废水,从而对人类和生态环境造成极大危害.因此,开展含DNBP废水的处理技术和方法研究具有重要的现实意义.TiO2半导体材料由于具有良好的光化学特性和电化学行为,近几十年来一直是光催化领域的研究热点.在能量等于或大于TiO2的带隙能级的辐照光照射下,TiO2可以产生光生电子/空穴对(e-/h+).光生电子和空穴分别与TiO2表面被吸附的H2O和O2分子反应,生成具有强氧化性的活性羟基自由基(OH),对硝基酚类有机污染物具有较强的降解能力.TiO2光催化反应属于非均相反应,反应在催化剂的表面进行,催化剂对污染物的吸附是影响其催化降解性能的重要因素.但是,传统TiO2光催化剂存在比表面积小,对有机污染物吸附能力差,光生电子与空穴易于复合等缺陷,限制了TiO2光催化技术的进一步发展和在水处理领域中的大规模应用. 我们基于气凝胶具有多孔性、大比表面积和高孔隙率的特点,以富含硅、铝的工业废弃物粉煤灰为反应原料,首先利用碱熔法和常压干燥技术制备出SiO2-Al2O3气凝胶.在此基础上,以钛酸四丁酯(TBOT)为反应前体,SiO2-Al2O3气凝胶为载体,利用酸催化溶胶-凝胶法(sol-gel)制备出TiO2/SiO2-Al2O3气凝胶三元复合光催化剂.利用X射线粉末衍射(XRD)、傅里叶变换红外光谱(FT-IR)、透射电子显微镜(TEM)、N2吸附-脱附(BET)、紫外-可见吸收光谱(UV-vis)等分析测试技术对所制备的TiO2/SiO2-Al2O3气凝胶三元复合光催化剂结构进行了表征.结果显示,在TiO2/SiO2-Al2O3气凝胶三元复合光催化剂中,粒径尺寸为10~30nm的锐钛矿型TiO2纳米颗粒均匀分散在SiO2-Al2O3气凝胶载体上.TiO2/SiO2-Al2O3气凝胶三元复合光催化剂呈现典型介孔材料的IV型等温线.SiO2-Al2O3气凝胶的加入极大提高了TiO2光催化剂的比表面积和对有机污染物的吸附性能,但是对TiO2光波吸收范围影响不大. 在制备出TiO2/SiO2-Al2O3气凝胶三元复合光催化剂基础上,进一步对其在可见光条件下的光催化性能进行了研究.以500W的Xe灯光源模拟自然太阳光,DNBP为探针污染物分子,系统考察了可见光照射条件下溶液pH值、光催化剂用量、光反应时间、DNBP溶液初始浓度不同因素对TiO2/SiO2-Al2O3气凝胶三元复合光催化剂催化活性的影响.结果表明,TiO2/SiO2-Al2O3气凝胶三元复合光催化剂对DNBP有机污染物的吸附率和光降解率明显高于纯TiO2样品.在DNBP溶液初始浓度为0.167mmol/L,pH=4.86,催化剂用量6g/L,光照时间5h的条件下,TiO2/SiO2-Al2O3气凝胶三元复合光催化剂对DNBP的降解率几乎高达100%.根据Langmuir-Hinshelwood方程,在低浓度下光催化降解反应符合一级反应动力学.所制备的TiO2/SiO2-Al2O3气凝胶三元复合光催化剂具有良好的稳定性和重复利用性能.重复利用5次后,TiO2/SiO2-Al2O3气凝胶三元复合光催化剂对DNBP的降解率仍高达90%以上.利用紫外-可见分光光度计、气相-质谱联用仪对DNBP降解中间产物进行了分析,探讨了DNBP的光催化降解机理.
关键词二氧化钛     SiO2-Al2O3气凝胶     复合光催化剂     工业粉煤灰     2-仲丁基-4,6-二硝基苯酚     废水处理    

1 Introduction

2-sec-Butyl-4, 6-dinitrophenol (DNBP), one of the most important alkyl dinitrophenols, is widely used in the petrochemical industry as a polymerization inhibitor for vinyl aromatics and in agriculture as a herbicide [1, 2]. Owing to its high use in industry and agriculture, it is regularly detected in aquatic environments. Although there are benefits to using DNBP, it is now considered to exert negative influences on the environment owing to its toxicity, carcinogenicity and mutagenicity. DNBP is on a US Environmental Protection Agency blacklist for priority pollutants in water [3]. Although there has been much research on the removal of nitrophenol contaminants from the environment, there are only a few reports on DNBP degradation. DNBP is highly chemically stable, toxic and persistent in ecosystems [4-6]. Thus, removal of DNBP from aqueous solution has attracted considerable research interest.

Research on semiconducting materials that mediate photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants for environmental remediation is an area of growing interest [7, 8]. Among semiconductor photocatalysts, TiO2 is widely used for the destruction of organic pollutants because of its relatively high catalytic reactivity, good physical and chemical stability, low-toxicity and cost-effectiveness. TiO2 generates electron and hole pairs (e-/h+) upon irradiation of light energy equal to or greater than its band gap energy. If charge separation occurs, the photo-generated electrons and holes may migrate to the catalyst surface and participate in redox reactions with adsorbed species [9, 10]. However, TiO2 suffers from a low adsorption capacity, rapid recombination of electron-hole pairs, and the difficulty of recycling the catalyst. These issues have limited the use of TiO2 nanoparticles in practical applications such as wastewater treatment. Various attempts have been made to enhance the absorption capacity and photocatalytic activity of TiO2 nanoparticles. TiO2 supported on porous adsorbent materials is one approach that has drawn much attention. Supported TiO2 catalysts may allow the pollutant to be concentrated near the TiO2 particles, mediate adsorption of intermediates formed during degradation, and allow the catalyst to be recovered and reused [11-14]. Among support materials for TiO2, aerogels based on silica and other metal oxides (alumina, zirconia, tungsten oxide, or a mixtures of these oxides) are considered attractive candidates owing to their special physicochemical features, including high specific surface area, porous structure, high thermal stability, easily tunable chemical properties, environmen tally-friendly nature and photo-stable inorganic frameworks [15]. Recently, a silica aerogel-supported TiO2 has been used as a catalyst in photocatalytic processes [16]. The physicochemical properties of silica aerogel-supported TiO2 catalysts depended on their synthesis conditions and the degree of interaction between the TiO2 and silica aerogel support. The strong electric field present in the framework of these supports can minimize electron-hole recombination and also allows pollutants to be concentrated near the TiO2 particles [17, 18].

Aerogels based on silica and other metal oxides are traditionally prepared via supercritical drying processes using silicate ester, aluminosilica gel and other organometallic compounds as raw materials [19-21]. However, the precursors and supercritical drying techniques used for preparing the aerogels are costly and dangerous, which limits the practical and commercial viability of such supports. Fly ash is a coal combustion by-product consisting of an alumina-silica mixture with smaller amounts of iron, calcium, sodium and potassium [22].

The objective of our work was to investigate a TiO2/SiO2-Al2O3 aerogel composite catalyst for degradation of persistent organic contaminants in wastewater. Here, we report the synthesis of SiO2-Al2O3 binary aerogels derived from industrial fly ash, synthesized by an ambient pressure drying method. The prepared SiO2-Al2O3 binary aerogels were used as a support matrix for TiO2 nanoparticles, to create a composite material with a high adsorption capacity and enhanced photocatalytic activity. The photocatalytic degradation of DNBP over our TiO2/SiO2-Al2O3 aerogel composite was tested under visible light irradiation.

2 Experimental
2.1 Materials and reagents

A representative sample of the fly ash was collected from the Zhungeer coal mine (Inner Mongolia, China). The constituents of the fly ash used in the experiments were as follows: SiO2 48.16%, Al2O3 21.68%, Fe2O3 5.64%, TiO2 1.12%, CaO 2.04%, MgO 1.08%, K2O 0.50%, Na2O 0.12%, MnO2 0.02%, SO3 0.82%, and P2O5 0.54%. The loss on ignition (LOI) was determined to be 18.22%. DNBP was used as a model alkyl dinitrophenol pollutant and obtained from Retell Fine Chemical Co. Ltd. (Tianjin, China). Tetrabutyl titanate (TBOT, ≥98.0%), polyethylene glycol 400 (PEG-400) and trimethylchlorosilane (TMCS, ≥98.0%) were obtained from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co. Ltd., China. All other reagents used in this study, were AR grade obtained from Tianjin Kermel Chemical Reagents Co. Ltd., China. All reagents were used as received without further purification. Double distilled water was used to prepare solutions in the experiments.

2.2 Preparation of materials
2.2.1 Preparation of SiO2-Al2O3 aerogel samples from fly ash

Fly ash sample and sodium carbonate were well mixed at a mass ratio of 1:1 and calcined at 900 ℃ for 3 h in a muffle furnace. After cooling to room temperature, a HCl solution (5.0 mol/L) was added to the calcined product and stirred for 3 h at room temperature to produce an aluminosilica-sol. The mixture was then filtered and the homogeneous aluminosilica-sol was collected. The pH of the obtained aluminosilica-sol was adjusted to 10.0-11.0 using a NaOH solution (5.0 mol/L) for gelation. After 30 min the aluminosilica wet gels produced were aged for 6 h at 50 ℃ to strengthen the gel network structure, and then solvent exchanged with absolute ethanol at 50 ℃ for 24 h. Surface modification was performed by immersing the aluminosilica gels in TMCS/ethanol/cyclohexane solutions for 48 h. Surface modification and solvent exchange of the aluminosilica gels were performed simultaneously and the molar ratio of TMCS:ethanol:cyclohexane was 2:5:9. The aluminosilica gels were thoroughly washed with cyclohexane to remove unreacted agents and reaction products and the surface-modified gel samples were left to dry for 24 h. The gels were dried at 80 ℃ in an oven at atmospheric pressure. The resultant aluminosilica gels were stored in a vacuum desiccator prior to further use.

2.2.2 Preparation of TiO2/SiO2-Al2O3 aerogel composite

The TiO2/SiO2-Al2O3 aerogel composite was prepared through an acid-catalyzed sol-gel method. A typical procedure was as follows: 0.093 g of the as-obtained SiO2-Al2O3 aerogel was added to a mixture of 5 mL absolute ethanol, 2 mL acetic acid and 2.5 mL water. The mixture was sonicated for 30 min at room temperature to obtain a suspension. A 5-mL portion of TBOT was added gradually to a mixture of 10 mL anhydrous ethanol and 3 mL acetic acid under continuous stirring to prepare the titanium precursor. The titania-sol was slowly added to the suspension of SiO2-Al2O3 aerogel to initiate the hydrolysis reaction. After complete hydrolysis of the titanium precursor, the colloidal solution was continuously stirred for 2 h until the formation of a TiO2 gel. After aging for at least 12 h at room temperature, the resulting sample was then dried at 110 ℃ for 12 h, and calcined at 300 ℃ for 1 h and 450 ℃ for 2 h in a muffle furnace under ambient atmosphere. The resultant TiO2/SiO2-Al2O3 aerogel composite materials were stored in a vacuum desiccator prior to further use.

2.3 Characterization

The X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) patterns of the materials were measured by a Rigaku D/MAX-2000 diffractometer using Cu Karadiation operating at 30 mA and 40 kV with a scan rate of 2q = 4.8°/min. Fourier transform infrared spectra (FT-IR) of the samples within the 400-4000 cm-1 frequency range were measured on a Nicolet Avatar 360 FT-IR infrared spectrometer using conventional KBr pellets. The particle size and morphologies of the samples were also determined with a transmission electron microscope (TEM, FEI Tecnai G220S-TWIN, America). The UV-vis diffuse reflectance spectra (UV-vis/DRS) of the catalysts in the range 200-800 nm were measured on a JASCO UV-550 ultraviolet spectrometer equipped with an integrating sphere with BaSO4 as a reference. The specific surface areas of the catalysts were determined by the BET method with a Micromeritics ASAP 2010 apparatus. All the samples were previously degassed at 350 ℃ for 12 h.

2.4 Zero point charge (pHzpc) measurement

The zero point charge (pHzpc) of the TiO2/SiO2-Al2O3 aerogel catalyst was measured with 10-mL portions of NaCl aqueous solution (0.05 mol/L) that were adjusted to pH values in the range 2-11 by either HCl or NaOH solutions (0.1 mol/L) [23]. N2 gas was bubbled through the NaCl solutions to remove dissolved CO2 until the initial pH stabilized. After determination of the initial pH value, the solutions were mixed with 0.03 g of the catalyst sample for 24 h and the final pH of the solutions was then measured. The pHzpc value was defined as the pH at which the initial and final pH values were equal. The pH of the solution was measured by using a Mettler-Toledo (model Delta 320-S) digital pH meter.

2.5 Photocatalytic degradation of DNBP

Photocatalytic degradation of DNBP was performed in a XPA-7 photochemical reactor (Xujiang Electromechanical Plant, Nanjing, China). Cylindrical quartz photochemical reactors of 22 cm x 2 cm (height x diameter) were vertically placed at a fixed distance (3.5 cm) from a 500 W Xenon lamp (Institute of Electric Light Source, Beijing) as light source to mimic solar irradiation. For the irradiation experiments, an aqueous solution of DNBP (40 mL) and the photocatalyst were added to the photoreactor. The resultant mixture was stirred continuously in the dark for at least 2 h to ensure the adsorption/desorption equilibrium of DNBP was established. The suspensions were then irradiated by the xenon lamp with the transmission of wavelengths below 380 nm limited using glass filters, while continuous purging the reactor with air. Aliquots were withdrawn at specific time intervals during the degradation experiments and analyzed after centrifugation for 5 min at 3000 r/min to completely remove any solid particles. The filtrates were subjected to UV-visible spectrophotometric analysis to monitor the concentration of DNBP at various time intervals at a wavelength of 271 nm [24]. The mineralization of DNBP was monitored by measuring the total organic carbon (TOC) with an Elementary Analyzer (Multi N/C 2100S, Analytikjena) by direct injection of the aqueous solution after the photocatalysis reaction. The GC/MS system (Agilent 6890 GC and 5793 MS) was used to identify the intermediate products formed during the photooxidative process. The carrier gas flow rate was 0.5 mL/min and the oven temperature was programmed as follows: isothermal at 40 ℃ for 5 min, from 40 to 280 ℃ at 5℃/min, and isothermal at 280 ℃ for 1 min.

3 Results and discussion
3.1 Characterization results

Fig. 1 illustrates the XRD patterns of pure TiO2, SiO2-Al2O3 aerogel, and TiO2/SiO2-Al2O3 aerogel composite. A series of intensified anatase diffraction peaks were observed in Fig. 1(1). The XRD pattern of the SiO2-Al2O3 aerogel (Fig. 1(2)) showed a broad, weak peak in the range 15°-30°, attributable to amorphous SiO2. The non-crystalline diffraction peaks of SiO2 were so broad that peaks from Al2O3 were not visible in the pattern. According to Fig. 1(3), the XRD pattern of the TiO2/SiO2-Al2O3 aerogel composite contained the same characteristic peaks as anatase-type TiO2, which indicated that the introducing the SiO2-Al2O3 aerogel only slightly weakened the diffraction patterns of pure TiO2.

Fig. 1. XRD patterns of (1) TiO2, (2) SiO2-Al2O3 aerogel, and (3) TiO2/SiO2-Al2O3 aerogel composite.

Fig. 2 shows FT-IR spectra of the SiO2-Al2O3 aerogel, pure TiO2 and TiO2/SiO2-Al2O3 aerogel composite. In these spectra, the broad absorption peaks at 3440 and 1630 cm-1 were attributed to stretching and bending vibrations of surface absorbed water and hydroxyl groups. The SiO2-Al2O3 aerogel samples (Fig. 2(1)) showed characteristic peaks of Si-O-Si asymmetric and symmetric vibrations at 1080 and 762 cm-1 [25]. The peak at 847 cm-1 was attributed to a stretching vibration of Al-O-Al. The absorption peaks centered around 2960 and 1258 cm-1 corresponded to stretching and deformation modes of C-H and Si-C bonds, respectively [26]. The absorption bands of the Si-C bond and C-H bonds confirmed the modification of the SiO2-Al2O3 aerogel samples. As shown in Fig. 2(2), the low frequency absorption in the region 500-700 cm-1 can be assigned to a stretching vibration of Ti-O-Ti. FT-IR spectra of pure TiO2 and TiO2/SiO2-Al2O3 aerogel composites showed a similar shape. In Fig. 2(3), the characteristic absorption peaks of the stretching vibrations of Si-O-Si and Ti-O-Ti are visible, demonstrating the successful synthesis of TiO2/SiO2-Al2O3 aerogel composite samples.

Fig. 2. FT-IR spectra of (1) SiO2-Al2O3 aerogel, (2) TiO2, and (3) TiO2/SiO2-Al2O3 aerogel composite.

Fig. 3 shows TEM images of the as-prepared SiO2-Al2O3 aerogel and TiO2/SiO2-Al2O3 aerogel composite. Fig. 3(a) shows that the SiO2-Al2O3 aerogel was porous with a regular network structure. The TiO2/SiO2-Al2O3 aerogel composite (Fig. 3(b)) featured TiO2 particles ranging in size from 10 to 30 nm dispersed evenly on the SiO2-Al2O3 aerogel. The SiO2-Al2O3 aerogels improved the dispersion and reduced the average size of the TiO2 particle agglomerates. In addition, the structural characteristics of the SiO2-Al2O3 aerogel indicate its potential for enhancing adsorption of organic pollutants.

Fig. 3. TEM images of (a) SiO2-Al2O3 aerogel and (b) TiO2/SiO2-Al2O3 aerogel composite.

Fig. 4 shows a nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherm of an as-synthesized TiO2/SiO2-Al2O3 aerogel composite sample, which showed a type IV-like isotherm with a type H1 hysteresis loop. This finding suggests the presence of mesoporosity in the TiO2/SiO2-Al2O3 aerogel composite matrix. According to the results calculated by BET, the surface areas of the TiO2, SiO2-Al2O3 aerogel and TiO2/SiO2-Al2O3 aerogel composite samples were 87, 401.4 and 107.8 m2/g, respectively. The lower surface area of the composite than that of the SiO2-Al2O3 aerogel may be explained by TiO2 particles in the composite shrinking the overall surface area through particle agglomeration and/or blocking pores. However, the SiO2-Al2O3 aerogel in the composite gave a higher surface area than that of TiO2 alone, confirming the supporting role of the SiO2-Al2O3 binary aerogels. The high specific surface area of TiO2/SiO2-Al2O3 aerogel improved photocatalytic degradation of organic contaminants by allowing better adsorption of reactant molecules. Enhancing the concentration of reactant molecules around the TiO2 photoactive layer will benefit photocatalytic decomposition of organic pollutants. Reactant molecules are more likely to interact quickly with short-lived hydroxyl radicals that are localized on the SiO2-Al2O3 aerogel surface.

Fig. 4. N2 adsorption-desorption isotherm of TiO2/SiO2-Al2O3 aerogel composite.

Fig. 5 shows UV-vis diffuse reflectance spectra of TiO2 and the TiO2/SiO2-Al2O3 aerogel composite in the range of 200-800 nm. There were no major differences in the absorption of the TiO2/SiO2-Al2O3 aerogel composite compared with that of pure TiO2. This indicates that the SiO2-Al2O3 aerogels only slightly affected the absorption profile of the TiO2. The TiO2/SiO2-Al2O3 aerogel composite exhibited slight stronger absorption in the visible region than that of the pure TiO2 samples. This is because the SiO2-Al2O3 aerogel ensured a better distribution of the TiO2 nanoparticles to maximize their photoconversion efficiency. According to the method reported in the literature [27], the band gap energies (Eg) of the TiO2/SiO2-Al2O3 aerogel composite and pure TiO2 were calculated to be 3.02 and 3.08 eV, respectively.

Fig. 5. UV-vis absorption spectra of (1) pure TiO2 and (2) TiO2/SiO2-Al2O3 aerogel composite.
3.2 Photocatalytic degradation of DNBP

The effects of reaction variables such as pH, catalyst concentration, initial concentration of DNBP, irradiation time on the degradation efficiency were investigated.

3.2.1 Effect of pH

Solution pH influences adsorption and dissociation of the substrate, catalyst surface charge, oxidation potential of the valence band and other physicochemical properties of the system. The effect of pH on the photocatalytic degradation efficiency of DNBP was investigated at different pH values in the range 1.86-12.89 and the results are presented in Fig. 6. During these experiments, the pH of the solution was adjusted before light irradiation, but was not controlled during the course of the reaction. The figure shows that the degradation efficiency of DNBP increased as the pH was increased from 1.86 to 4.86. For further increases in pH the degradation efficiency started to decrease. Maximum degradation was obtained at pH = 4.86 (natural pH of DNBP solution) under visible light irradiation.

Fig. 6. Effect of pH on photocatalytic degradation of DNBP. Conditions: C0(DNBP) = 0.167 mmol/L, C(catalyst) = 6 g/L, irradiation time = 5 h. Inset shows a plot for determination of pHzpc of the as-prepared TiO2/SiO2-Al2O3 aerogel composite.

The solution pH affected the formation of OH radicals as illustrated in the following equations [28]:

$TI{{O}_{2}}+hv\to TI{{O}_{2}}+e_{cb}^{-}+h_{vb}^{+}$ (1)
$h_{vb}^{+}+{{H}_{2}}O\to \cdot O{{H}_{ads}}+{{H}^{+}}$ (2)
$h_{vb}^{+}+O{{H}^{-}}\to \cdot O{{H}_{ads}}$ (3)
$\cdot O{{H}_{ads}}+DNBP\to \cdots \deg radation products$ (4)

very low and high pH values disfavor production of OH radical because of the high redox potentials of Eqs. (2) and (3). The change in solution pH also affected the TiO2 surface. The pH-dependence of the surface charge was consistent with the pHzpc of the photocatalyst. The pHzpc value was determined to be approximately 4.76 for the prepared TiO2/SiO2-Al2O3 aerogel composite (Fig. 6 inset). DNBP exists mainly in its molecular forms in acidic medium, and is more likely to dissociate into anions at higher pH values because the pKa value of DNBP is 4.62. Consequently, DNBP was more favorably adsorbed to the surface of the TiO2/SiO2-Al2O3 aerogel composite under weak acidic conditions, resulting in a higher DNBP degradation efficiency.

3.2.2 Effect of catalyst concentration

The effect of catalyst concentration on the photocatalytic degradation efficiency of DNBP was investigated in the concentration range 2-10 g/L. Fig. 7 shows a steady decrease in the DNBP absorption peak for up to 6 g/L of the catalyst. At higher catalyst concentrations the peak absorbance was higher than that at lower concentrations, which indicates the optimal degradation efficiency was achieved at 6 g/L. The enhanced degradation efficiency from 2 to 6 g/L may be attributed to an increased number of available adsorption and catalytic sites on the catalyst surface. However, at high catalyst concentrations, agglomeration of catalyst particles may have increased light scattering and decreased the number of surface active sites, which in turn reduced the production of ·OH radicals and lowered the specific activity of the catalyst. Therefore, an optimized catalyst concentration of 6 g/L was used for further experiments.

Fig. 7. Time dependent UV-vis absorbance spectra of DNBP degradation in solutions containing different concentrations of TiO2/SiO2-Al2O3 aerogel composite. Inset shows the effect of TiO2/SiO2-Al2O3 aerogel concentration on the photocatalytic degradation efficiency of DNBP. Conditions: C0(DNBP) = 0.167 mmol/L, pH = 4.86, irradiation time = 5 h.
3.2.3 Effect of irradiation time

Fig. 8 presents the effect of irradiation time on the photocatalytic degradation of DNBP under the optimized experimental conditions. In a control experiment in which DNBP was illuminated with visible light in the absence of photocatalyst no degradation was observed in solution. This confirmed that the degradation of DNBP occurred predominately via photocatalysis rather than photolysis. The photoactivity of the TiO2/SiO2-Al2O3 aerogel composite was superior to that of pure TiO2. The DNBP photocatalytic degradation efficiencies of pure TiO2 and TiO2/SiO2-Al2O3 aerogel composites after irradiation for 5 h were 68.2% and 99.1%, respectively. The enhanced photocatalytic activity of the TiO2/SiO2-Al2O3 aerogel composite may be attributed to its high capacity for adsorbing organic pollutants. The presence of a mixed TiOSi phase at the TiO2/SiO2-Al2O3 aerogel interface may also contribute to the high photocatalytic activity of the TiO2/SiO2-Al2O3 aerogel composite [29]. Interfaces of this type have been shown to possess sites with high Brönsted acidity. The strong Brönsted acid sites in the TiOSi region may activate the pollutants towards oxidation.

Fig. 8. Effect of irradiation time on the photocatalytic degradation efficiency of DNBP. Conditions: C0(DNBP) = 0.167 mmol/L, pH 4.86, C(catalyst) = 6 g/L.
3.2.4 Effect of initial DNBP concentration and kinetics of photocatalytic degradation

The effect of the DNBP concentration on the photocatalytic degradation efficiency in the presence of the TiO2/SiO2-Al2O3 aerogel composite catalyst was studied by varying the initial concentration from 0.0629 to 0.2087 mmol/L. The percentage degradation decreased as the initial DNBP concentration was increased. This may be due to blocking of photocatalytic active sites on the catalyst and reduced interaction of light with these sites. At higher DNBP concentrations a larger portion of light was absorbed by the DNBP rather than the catalyst particles, which also reduced the efficiency of the photocatalytic reaction. The photocatalytic reaction on the surface of TiO2/SiO2-Al2O3 aerogel composite catalyst was a pseudo-first-order reaction and its kinetic equation can be expressed by Langmuir-Hinshelwood model:

$r=-\frac{dC}{dt}=\frac{{{k}_{r}}KC}{1+KC}$ (5)

The integrated form of Eq. (6) is:

$t=\left( \frac{1}{{{k}_{r}}K} \right)1n\left( \frac{{{C}_{0}}}{C} \right)+\frac{{{C}_{0}}V}{{{k}_{r}}}$ (6)

where t refers to the irradiation time, C0 is initial concentration of DNBP and C is the concentration of DNBP at time t, r represents the rate of degradation, K is the equilibrium constant for the adsorption of DNBP onto the catalyst and kr reflects the limiting rate of the reaction at the maximum coverage in these experimental conditions.

At low initial DNBP concentrations, the second term in the Eq.(6) becomes insignificant and can be neglected, such that:

$1n\left( \frac{{{C}_{0}}}{C} \right)={{k}_{r}}Kt={{k}_{app}}t$ (7)

where kapp is the apparent rate constant for the photocatalytic degradation.

A plot of ln(C0/C) vs t gives a straight line, as can be seen in Fig. 9, confirming the applicability of Langmuir-Hinshelwood equation with kapp = 0.52-0.13 h-1, in the DNBP concentration range 0.0629-0.2087 mmol/L. The apparent rate constant decreased as the initial DNBP concentration was increased in the solution.

Fig. 9. Degradation kinetic plots for different initial concentrations of DNBP in the presence of TiO2/SiO2-Al2O3 aerogel composite.
3.2.5 Recycling of the catalyst

Recycling and reuse of a photocatalyst is an important factor for its practical application. Thus, we investigated reuse of our TiO2/SiO2-Al2O3 aerogel composite photocatalyst. After one cycle of DNBP photodegradation, the photocatalyst was filtrated, washed, dried at 80 ℃ for 4 h and then reused for further cycles, while maintaining other reaction conditions. The photocatalytic efficiency of the composite remained above 90% even after 5 cycles (Fig. 10). This indicates that the TiO2/SiO2-Al2O3 aerogel composite catalyst has good reusability. The reduction in the photocatalytic degradation efficiency over the 5 cycles was likely caused by fouling of the catalyst by organic intermediates generated during the photocatalytic reaction, which lowered the ·OH radical production rate.

Fig. 10. Results of recycling studies.
3.3 Intermediate products

We attempted to identify intermediate products generated during photocatalytic degradation of DNBP, in an aqueous suspension of the TiO2/SiO2-Al2O3 aerogel composite by GC-MS analysis. Samples were taken at different irradiation time, then filtered and concentrated to 5 mL by rotatory evaporation at 40 ℃. The anhydrous residue was dissolved in 25 mL of diethyl ether and sonicated for 10 min. Diethyl ether was removed under reduced pressure, and the residual mass was mixed with 2 mL of methanol and 1 mL of trimethylsulfonium hydroxide. The mixture was then agitated for 10 min at 50 ℃ and the resulting samples were injected into the GC/MS system (Agilent 6890 GC and 5793 MS) for analysis. From the GC/MS analyses, the main identified intermediates resulting from photocatalytic degradation of DNBP were 3, 5-dinitro-salicylaldehyde, 3, 5-dinitrocatechol, 4-nitrocatechol. These intermediates may undergo further degradation, eventually leading to aromatic ring opening and formation of aliphatic mono- and dicarboxylic acids, which could eventually be mineralized to CO2, H2O and NO3-.

Mineralization of refractory organic pollutants with fast kinetics is highly desirable for pollution control. We measured the TOC content of the DNBP wastewater to evaluate mineralization of the compound before and after the photochemical treatment in the presence of TiO2/SiO2-Al2O3 aerogel composite photocatalyst. The reduction of TOC in the aqueous DNBP solution after 5 h of visible light irradiation was 70.15% for the TiO2/SiO2-Al2O3 aerogel composite photocatalyst. This result confirmed destruction of DNBP and demonstrates the excellent photocatalytic performance of the prepared TiO2/SiO2-Al2O3 aerogel composite photocatalyst.

4 Conclusions

In summary, TiO2 nanoparticles loaded on SiO2-Al2O3 aerogels from industrial fly ash as raw materials were successfully prepared by a simple sol-gel method. Taking advantages of TiO2 and SiO2-Al2O3 aerogel, the as-obtained TiO2/SiO2-Al2O3 aerogel composite featured a high adsorption capacity and enhanced photocatalytic activity for degradation of DNBP under visible light irradiation. Satisfactory photocatalytic degradation efficiency could be achieved using optimized operation parameters. The photocatalytic reactions appeared to follow pseudo-first-order kinetics with the reaction rate constant from 0.52 to 0.13 h-1 in the DNBP concentration range of 0.0629 to 0.2087 mmol/L. The TiO2/SiO2-Al2O3 aerogel composite catalyst could be reused with no obvious decline in photocatalytic efficiency observed after five cycles of catalytic degradation. The results of this study show that a TiO2/SiO2-Al2O3 aerogel composite material can be used as an efficient photocatalyst for removal of organic pollutants from water.

References
[1] P. Millburn, D. A. Leger, H. O’Neill, J. E. Rishards, J. A. MacLeod, K. MacQuarrie, Water Qual. Res. J. Can.,1995, 30 :383–397.
[2] J. I. Nakajima, S. Tanizaki, H. Tomioka, J. Jpn. Pet. Inst.,2003, 46 :359–367. DOI:10.1627/jpi.46.359
[3] M. Crawford, Science,1986, 234 :422.
[4] C. M. Palmeria, Toxic. Subst. Mech.,1999, 18 :187–204. DOI:10.1080/107691899229070
[5] K. L. Takahashi, H. Hojo, H. Aoyama, S. Teramoto, Reprod. Toxicol.,2004, 18 :581–588. DOI:10.1016/j.reprotox.2004.02.009
[6] H. L. Wang, W. F. Jiang, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.,2007, 46 :5405–5411. DOI:10.1021/ie070332d
[7] M. A. Fox, M. T. Dulay, Chem. Rev.,1993, 93 :341–357. DOI:10.1021/cr00017a016
[8] H. R. Hoffmann, S. T. Martin, W. Choi, D. W. Bahnemann, Chem. Rev.,1995, 95 :69–96. DOI:10.1021/cr00033a004
[9] A. Fujishima, X. T. Zhang, D. A. Tryk, Surf. Sci. Rep.,2008, 63 :515–582. DOI:10.1016/j.surfrep.2008.10.001
[10] A. Di Paola, E. García-López, G. Marcì, L. Palmisano, J. Hazard. Mater.,2012, 211-212 :3–29. DOI:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.11.050
[11] T. Torimoto, S. Ito, S. Kuwabata, H. Yoneyama, Environ. Sci. Technol.,1996, 30 :1275–1281. DOI:10.1021/es950483k
[12] M. Toyoda, Y. Nanbu, T. Kito, M. Hiranob, M. Inagaki, Desalination,2003, 159 :273–282. DOI:10.1016/S0011-9164(03)90079-8
[13] A. Bhattacharyya, S. Kawi, M. B. Ray, Catal. Today,2004, 98 :431–439. DOI:10.1016/j.cattod.2004.08.010
[14] M. Mahalakshmi, S. Vishnu Priya, B. Arabindoo, M. Palanichamy, V. Murugesan, J. Hazard. Mater.,2009, 161 :336–343. DOI:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.03.098
[15] A. C. Pierre, G. M. Pajonk, Chem. Rev.,2002, 102 :4243–4266. DOI:10.1021/cr0101306
[16] H. L. Wang, W. Z. Liang, W. F. Jiang, Mater. Chem. Phys.,2011, 130 :1372–1379. DOI:10.1016/j.matchemphys.2011.09.033
[17] S. Sankararaman, K. B. Yoon, T. Yabe, J. K. Kochi, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,1991, 113 :1419–1421. DOI:10.1021/ja00004a057
[18] A. N. kte, . Yılmaz, Appl. Catal. B,2008, 85 :92–102. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2008.07.025
[19] T. Horiuchi, L. Y. Chen, T. Osaki, T. Sugiyama, K. Suzuki, T. Mori, Catal. Lett.,1999, 58 :89–92. DOI:10.1023/A:1019069631852
[20] P. B. Sarawade, J. K. Kim, H. K. Kim, H. T. Kim, Appl. Surf. Sci.,2007, 254 :574–579. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2007.06.063
[21] H. Tamon, T. Sone, M. Okazaki, J. Colloid Interf. Sci.,1997, 188 :162–167. DOI:10.1006/jcis.1996.4731
[22] R. S. Iyer, J. A. Scott, Resour. Conserv. Recycl.,2001, 31 :217–228. DOI:10.1016/S0921-3449(00)00084-7
[23] Y. F. Jia, B. Xiao, K. M. Thomas, Langmuir,2002, 18 :470–478. DOI:10.1021/la011161z
[24] H. L. Wang, S. Q. Liu, X. Y. Zhang, J. Hazard. Mater.,2009, 169 :448–453. DOI:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.03.130
[25] H. J. Jeon, S. C. Yi, S. G. Oh, Biomaterials,2003, 24 :4921–4928. DOI:10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00415-0
[26] M. Łączka, K. Cholewa-Kowalska, M. Kogut, J. Non-Cryst. Solids,2001, 287 :10–14. DOI:10.1016/S0022-3093(01)00532-4
[27] A. Mills, R. H. Davies, D. Worsley, Chem. Soc. Rev.,1993, 22 :417–425. DOI:10.1039/cs9932200417
[28] M. Nikazar, K. Gholivand, K. Mahanpoor, Desalination,2008, 219 :293–300. DOI:10.1016/j.desal.2007.02.035
[29] C. Anderson, A. J. Bard, J. Phys. Chem. B,1997, 101 :2611–2616. DOI:10.1021/jp9626982