催化学报  2017, Vol. 38 Issue (1): 1-4   PDF    
扩展功能
加入收藏夹
复制引文信息
加入引用管理器
Email Alert
RSS
本文作者相关文章
Ding Yunjie
Co2C nanoprisms for syngas conversion to lower olefins with high selectivity
Ding Yunjie     
a. Dalian National Laboratory for Clean Energy State Key Laboratory of Catalysis, Dalian 116023, Liaoning, China ;
b. Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Dalian 116023, Liaoning, China
* Corresponding author. Yunjie Ding Tel: +86-411-84379143; Fax: +86-411-84379143;E-mail:dyj@dicp.ac.cn.
用于合成气高选择性直接制备低碳烯烃的碳化钴纳米棱柱结构
丁云杰     
a. 中国科学院大连化学物理研究所洁净能源国家实验室, 辽宁大连 116023 ;
b. 中国科学院大连化学物理研究所催化基础国家重点实验室, 辽宁大连 116023
摘要:低碳烯烃(乙烯、丙烯、丁烯)是十分重要的有机化工原料,在传统工业中,主要通过石脑油,石油气和凝析油裂解得到.由于石油资源的日益减少和C1化学的迅速发展,为缓解对石油资源的依赖,急需寻找一种烯烃制备的工艺过程替代石油路线.主流的非石油路线主要是指利用煤炭、天然气、生物质等含碳资源通过合成气直接或间接制备烯烃.间接过程是由合成气转化制得甲醇,然后通过甲醇转化路线(包括甲醇制烯烃的MTO工艺和甲醇制丙烯的MTP工艺)生产烯烃产品.无疑,如能减少反应步骤,将合成气直接高选择性合成低碳烯烃,将体现出流程更短能耗更低的优势,有较强的竞争力. 国内外的研究学者一直致力于制备含两种组元的双功能催化剂,试图将甲醇合成及脱水制备烯烃两步耦合在一起,合并为一步法,从而简化工业过程.由于低温下MTO反应几乎无活性,目前该类双功能复合催化剂多采用较高的反应温度.鉴于传统的Cu-Zn-Al催化剂在高温下极低的甲醇选择性,而Zn与其它过渡金属复合氧化物(如ZnZr及ZnCr)可在高温下高选择性合成甲醇,故经常被考虑作为耦合催化剂进行研究.基于上述理念,大化所包信和等提出了全新的OX-ZEO过程,OX(复合氧化物)用来活化CO分子并形成相应中间体,这些中间体可以在ZEO(分子筛)的酸性位上形成相应的烯烃.他们报道的ZnCrO x /MSAPO催化剂,在较高的CO转化率(17%)下,低碳烯烃选择性高达80%.与此同时,厦门大学王野等采用ZnZr二元氧化物与SAPO-34分子筛物理混合的双功能催化剂,也可实现很高的低碳烯烃选择性(74%). 合成气经费托路线直接制烯烃(FTO)反应与费托(FT)反应类似,传统FT催化剂均可用于FTO的改性研究.由于Fe基催化剂的加氢能力相对较弱,产物中烯/烷比较高,所以被广泛用于FTO反应的研究中.de Jong研究小组采用惰性载体负载的Fe基催化剂,并浸渍Na,S元素作为助剂进行FTO反应的研究,实现了61%的低碳烯烃的选择性,但由于反应温度较高(300-350℃),催化剂容易失活,稳定性不佳.此外,由于产物受到ASF分布的限制,甲烷选择性很高.目前FTO研究的挑战在于开发全新的催化活性位结构新方法,摆脱ASF分布的限制,在较温和的反应条件下同时呈现低甲烷选择性及高烯烃选择性. 一般认为,金属Co纳米颗粒是Co基费托催化剂的活性相,主要产物为C5+长链饱和烷烃,而Co2C则被视为Co基FT催化剂失活的主要原因之一,即在合成气转化过程中Co2C活性很低且CH4选择性很高.但是,最近中国科学院上海高等研究院低碳转化科学与工程重点实验室的钟良枢及孙予罕领导的研究小组发现,暴露(020)及(101)晶面的Co2C纳米棱柱结构对合成气转化具有异乎寻常的催化性能.该催化剂在温和的反应条件(250℃和0.1-0.5 MPa)下可实现合成气高选择性直接制备烯烃,甲烷选择性可低至5%,低碳烯烃选择性能够达到60%,而总烯烃选择性高达80%以上(以上所谈到的选择性都是去除了CO2产物),同时烯/烷比大于30,产物分布完全不服从经典的ASF规律,并且该催化剂具有良好的稳定性,反应600 h仍未出现明显失活.他们通过深入的构效关系研究并结合DFT理论计算,揭示了Co2C存在显著的晶面效应,相比于其它暴露面,(101)晶面非常有利于烯烃的生成,同时(101)和(020)晶面可有效抑制甲烷的形成.

The lower olefins, which generally refer to ethylene, propylene and butylene, are basic building blocks in the chemical industry and are traditionally produced from thermal or catalytic cracking of naphtha and oil in the refining process [1]. With the rapid depletion of the earth’s limited petroleum reserves, there is an urgent need for processes that can produce lower olefins from alternative feedstocks. Some of the alternative routes to the lower olefins include the dehydrogenation of lower alkanes, syngas-based processes and specific processes for particular target products, such as the production of ethylene by dehydration of ethanol derived from renewable sources. The processes used for the production of lower olefins from syngas can be divided into two main groups: indirect processes [2], which require the synthesis of an intermediate such as methanol or dimethyl ether (known as methanol to olefins (MTO) or dimethyl ether to olefins (DMTO)), and direct processes. Identifying a suitable direct process is one of the most challenging topics in the field of C1 chemistry, but such a process is highly desirable owing to its simplified operation and low energy consumption (Fig. 1) [3].

Fig. 1. Various processes for the production of lower olefins from syngas(figure taken from Ref. [3]).

To simplify the industrial MTO process for the direct production of lower olefins from syngas, scientists have focused on developing a bifunctional catalyst system that couples the methanol synthesis and the C-C coupling reaction. Because the MTO reaction has extremely low activity at low temperatures, the methanol synthesis in the bifunctional system needs to be carried out at high temperatures. As a result, high-temperature methanol synthesis catalysts, such as ZnZr or ZnCr, are chosen as one part of the bifunctional catalyst. Recently, Bao’s group [4] reported that ZnCrO x /MSAPO exhibited very high selectivity toward lower olefins under conditions of 400 ℃, 2.5 MPa and a H2/CO ratio of 1.5. A C2-4= selectivity of 80% and C2-4 of 94% (based on CO2 excluding that in the products) was obtained with a CO conversion of 17%. It was suggested that the partially reduced ZnCrO x oxide surface activated the CO and H2 to form a ketene, which was subsequently converted into lower olefins in the zeolite pores. Wang’s group [5] also reported that coupling the methanol synthesis and the MTO reaction using a bifunctional catalyst could be used for the direct conversion of syngas to lower olefins with high selectivity. Under conditions of 400 ℃, 1 MPa and a H2/CO ratio of 2, selectivity for the lower olefins reached 74% with a CO conversion of 11%. However, neither of these processes is yet in commercial use.

The Fischer-Tropsch-to-olefins (FTO) reaction is very similar to the typical Fischer-Tropsch (FT) process, and FT catalysts can be used for the FTO reaction after suitable modification. Fe-based FTO catalysts are often studied, owing to their low cost and the high olefin content in the final product, and some promising results have been achieved [6-8]. de Jong’s group [6] reported outstanding results using Fe-based catalysts promoted by S and Na and supported on α -alumina or carbon nanofibers; these catalysts exhibited a selectivity for lower olefins of up to 61%. However, these reactions usually require temperatures of 300-350 ℃, which cause catalyst sintering and carbon deposition on the catalyst surface, and thus deactivate the catalyst and shorten its lifetime [9]. In addition, the hydrocarbons obtained with the FTO process typically follow the so-called Anderson-Schulz-Flory (ASF) distribution, which is characterized by a maximum C2-4 hydrocarbon fraction of about 56.7% and an undesired methane fraction of about 29.2% [10, 11]. To simultaneously achieve high selectivity for lower olefins, low methane selectivity and high stability, it is therefore necessary to develop new FTO catalysts that deviate from the ASF distribution and operate under mild reaction conditions.

It is widely accepted that metallic Co preferentially produces heavy hydrocarbons with high selectivity for C5+ paraffins [12, 13]. The formation of Co2C is considered to be one of the main reasons for deactivation of the Co-based FT reaction because it possesses very low activity for CO hydrogenation, with methane and CO2 as the main products (Fig. 2) [14-18]. However, Zhong and Sun’s group [17] from the CAS Key Laboratory of Low-Carbon Conversion Science and Engineering now report that, under mild reaction conditions (250 ℃, 0.1-0.5 MPa), Co2C nanoprisms catalyze syngas conversion with high selectivity for the production of lower olefins. The process generated very little methane (about 5.0%), and the ratio of olefin/ paraffin among the C2-C4 products was as high as 30. The product distribution deviated markedly from the classical ASF distribution, and showed the highest selectivity for propylene. The catalyst also showed good stability under long-term operation; no obvious deactivation was detected after 600 h.

Fig. 2. Reaction selectivity in the Fischer-Tropsch process (figure taken from Ref. [18]).

This surprising result, which is quite different from the industrial Co-catalyzed FT reaction using metal Co nanoparticles and Co2C sphere-like nanoparticles, is attributed to the specific structure and morphology of the Co2C nanoprisms. Based on structural characterization and DFT calculations, it was suggested that there is a strong facet effect for the Co2C nanoparticles during syngas conversion. Specifically, the (101) and (020) facets of Co2C promote the production of olefins and inhibit the formation of methane (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of the CoMn catalysts after reaching a steady state. (a, b) Low-resolution TEM images; (c-e) High-resolution images of Co2C nanoprisms with exposed (101), (−101) and (020) facets. d, distance (length) of the lattice fringes. (f) The Co2C nanoprism has a parallelepiped shape, with four rectangular faces and two rhomboid faces (figure taken from Ref. [17]).

Zhong’s finding [17] is particularly surprising because the spherical Co2C crystallites have little activity towards olefin formation in this reaction, and because our results showed that the formation of spherical Co2C and the interface with the Co metal are essential for the production of alcohols [16]. However, according to density functional theory (DFT) calculations, non-dissociative or dissociative adsorption of CO on the Co2C nanoprisms is regrettably not involved in Zhong’s work [17].

This is a groundbreaking contribution that will deepen the understanding of the FT process and can be considered a good example of nanocatalysis with a facet effect. The high activity, selectivity and stability under mild reaction conditions suggest that these catalysts have immense potential industrial applications. As Prof. Michael Claeys [18] has said, “their potential impact cannot be overestimated: they might open up pathways for the development of greatly improved systems for producing valuable chemicals from a variety of carbon sources” and “Zhong et al. [17] have thrown open the reaction’s treasure chest, and added fresh momentum to research into methods for making olefins from synthesis gas”.

References
[1] H M. Torres Galvis, K P. de Jong, ACS Catal,2013, 3 :2130–2149. DOI:10.1021/cs4003436
[2] P Tian, Y X. Wei, M Ye, Z M. Liu, ACS Catal,2015, 5 :1922–1938. DOI:10.1021/acscatal.5b00007
[3] F Yu, Z J. Li, Y L. An, P Gao, L S. Zhong, Y H. Sun, J. Fuel Chem. Technol,2016, 44 :801–814.
[4] F Jiao, J J. Li, X L. Pan, J P. Xiao, H B. Li, H Ma, M M. Wei, Y Pan, Z Y. Zhou, M R. Li, S Miao, J Li, Y F. Zhu, D Xiao, T He, J H. Yang, F Qi, Q Fu, X H. Bao, Science,2016, 351 :1065–1068. DOI:10.1126/science.aaf1835
[5] K Cheng, B Gu, X L. Liu, J C. Kang, Q H. Zhang, Y Wang, Int. Ed,2016, 55 :4725–4728. DOI:10.1002/anie.201601208
[6] H M. Torres Galvis, J H. Bitter, C B. Khare, M Ruitenbeek, A I. Dugulan, K P. de Jong, Science,2012, 335 :835–838. DOI:10.1126/science.1215614
[7] H M. Torres Galvis, J H. Bitter, T Davidian, M Ruitenbeek, A I. Dugulan, K P. de Jong, J. Am. Chem. Soc,2012, 134 :16207–16215. DOI:10.1021/ja304958u
[8] H M. Torres Galvis, A C. J. Koeken, J H. Bitter, T Davidian, M Ruitenbeek, A I. Dugulan, K P. de Jong, J. Catal,2013, 303 :22–30. DOI:10.1016/j.jcat.2013.03.010
[9] A C. J. Koeken, H M. Torres Galvis, T Davidian, M Ruitenbeek, K P. de Jong, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed,2012, 51 :7190–7193. DOI:10.1002/anie.201200280
[10] Q H. Zhang, J C. Kang, Y Wang, ChemCatChem, ,2010, 2 :1030–1058. DOI:10.1002/cctc.201000071
[11] G P. van der Laan, A A. C. M. Beenackers, Catal. Rev,1999, 41 :255–318. DOI:10.1081/CR-100101170
[12] A Y. Khodakov, W Chu, P Fongarland, Chem. Rev,2007, 107 :1692–1744. DOI:10.1021/cr050972v
[13] E de Smit, B M. Weckhuysen, Chem. Soc. Rev,2008, 37 :2758–2781. DOI:10.1039/b805427d
[14] M Claeys, M E. Dry, E van Steen, E du Plessis, P J. van Berge, A M. Saib, D J. Moodley, J. Catal,2014, 318 :193–202. DOI:10.1016/j.jcat.2014.08.002
[15] J C. Mohandas, M K. Gnanamani, G Jacobs, W P. Ma, Y Y. Ji, S Khalid, B H. Davis, ACS Catal,2011, 1 :1581–1588. DOI:10.1021/cs200236q
[16] Y P. Pei, J X. Liu, Y H. Zhao, Y J. Ding, T Liu, W D. Dong, H J. Zhu, H Y. Su, L Yan, J L. Li, W X. Li, ACS Catal,2015, 5 :3620–3624. DOI:10.1021/acscatal.5b00791
[17] L S. Zhong, F Yu, Y L. An, Y H. Zhao, Y H. Sun, Z J. Li, T J. Lin, Y J. Lin, X Z. Qi, Y Y. Dai, L Gu, J S. Hu, S F. Jin, Q Shen, H Wang, Na-ture,2016, 538 :84–87.
[18] M Claeys, Nature,2016, 538 :44–45. DOI:10.1038/538044a