催化学报  2017, Vol. 38 Issue (1): 168-175   PDF    
扩展功能
加入收藏夹
复制引文信息
加入引用管理器
Email Alert
RSS
本文作者相关文章
Zhang Wanshuo
Gao Shangyao
Xie Sujuan
Liu Hui
Zhu Xiangxue
Shang Yongchen
Liu Shenglin
Xu Longya
Zhang Ye
A shaped binderless ZSM-11 zeolite catalyst for direct amination of isobutene to tert-butylamine
Zhang Wanshuoa,b, Gao Shangyaob,c, Xie Sujuanb, Liu Huib,d, Zhu Xiangxueb, Shang Yongchena, Liu Shenglinb, Xu Longyab, Zhang Yee     
a. College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Harbin Normal University, Harbin 150025, Heilongjiang, China ;
b. Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Dalian 116023, Liaoning, China ;
c. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China ;
d. Research and Development Center, Sinochem Quanzhou Petrochemical Co., Ltd., Quanzhou 362103, Fujian, China ;
e. PetroChina Fushun Petrochemical Company, Fushun 113008, Liaoning, China
Foundation Item: This work was supported by K.C.Wong Education Foundation, Hong Kong (201611), and Youth Innovation Promotion Association, CAS (20120155).
* Corresponding author. Yongchen Shang,Tel:+86-13936570503. E-mail:yongchenshang@163.com. Shenglin Liu,Tel:+86-411-84379968. E-mail:slliu@dicp.ac.cn.
Abstract: A shaped binderless and two binder-containing ZSM-11 zeolite catalysts were prepared and char-acterized by powder X-ray diffraction, N2 adsorption-desorption, and pyridine adsorption-infrared measurements. The binderless catalyst was synthesized using a dry-gel conversion technique, in which 1,6-hexanediamine and tetrabutylammonium bromide were used as structure-directing agents and no other alkaline materials were added. The catalytic performance of the zeolites in the direct amination of isobutene to tert-butylamine was evaluated in a fixed-bed reactor. By virtue of its high crystallinity as well as its good mechanical strength, the shaped binderless ZSM-11 catalyst showed a higher rate of formation of tert-butylamine than did the binder-containing catalysts.
© 2016, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Key words: Binderless zeolite     ZSM-11     Amination     Isobutene     Tert-butylamine    
无粘结剂ZSM-11催化剂上异丁烯直接胺化生成叔丁胺
张琬铄a,b, 高尚耀b,c, 谢素娟b, 刘惠b,d, 朱向学b, 商永臣a, 刘盛林b, 徐龙伢b, 张烨e     
a. 哈尔滨师范大学化学化工学院, 黑龙江哈尔滨 150025 ;
b. 中国科学院大连化学物理研究所, 辽宁大连 116023 ;
c. 中国科学院大学, 北京 100049 ;
d. 中化泉州石化有限公司研发中心, 福建泉州 362103 ;
e. 中国石油天然气股份有限公司抚顺石化分公司石油二厂, 辽宁抚顺 113008
摘要:叔丁胺是一种重要的化工原料和中间体,广泛应用于制备橡胶促进剂、医药、农药和着色剂等下游产品.异丁烯在分子筛催化剂上直接胺化生产叔丁胺是一个经济环保过程,其中ZSM-5和BEA分子筛的催化性能优于其它系列分子筛.ZSM-11与ZSM-5分子筛具有相似的孔道结构,我们以前的实验结果表明,与ZSM-5相比,ZSM-11表现出更优越的芳构化反应性能,在干气中乙烯低温芳构化方面也有明显优势.在此基础上,我们进行无粘结剂ZSM-11分子筛催化剂合成,并应用于异丁烯直接胺化生产叔丁胺反应. 传统水热技术合成的分子筛通常为粉末,机械强度不能达到实际应用的要求,在工业化过程中分子筛粉末一般需要加入粘结剂成型使其具备一定的机械强度和形状,但是粘结剂会降低分子筛催化剂的活性和选择性,有可能会引发一些副反应,因此无粘结剂分子筛催化剂引起人们广泛关注.无粘结剂分子筛是指分子筛颗粒中不含惰性粘结剂或只含有少量粘结剂,主要依靠分子筛晶粒间的相互作用支撑存在,具有一定形状、尺寸和机械强度的催化材料.无粘结剂分子筛催化剂中分子筛含量较高,可利用的有效表面积较大,在离子交换及工业催化等方面具有明显优势. 本文采用水热合成的ZSM-11分子筛原粉与二氧化硅机械混合(ZSM-11/SiO2=70/30)挤条后,通过气固相合成法制备了无粘结剂ZSM-11分子筛催化剂(Cat-C).作为对比,还分别制备了ZSM-11和SiO2机械混合(ZSM-11/SiO2=70/30)样品HZSM-11+SiO2及ZSM-11和氧化铝机械混合(ZSM-11/Al2O3=70/30)样品HZSM-11+Al2O3.利用X射线衍射、透射电镜、NH3程序升温脱附和吸附吡啶红外光谱等对分子筛催化剂的物理化学性能进行了表征.同时,以这些分子筛样品为催化剂,在固定床反应装置上进行了异丁烯胺化反应评价,反应条件为270℃,5.0 MPa,氨烯比为4和异丁烯空速0.5 h-1.结果表明,与HZSM-11+SiO2和HZSM-11+Al2O3相比,Cat-C上叔丁胺生成速率最高.关联催化剂物化性能和反应性能发现,催化剂孔道结构与叔丁胺生成并不存在明显的关联性,而较多的Brönsted酸和较少的Lewis酸才是Cat-C具有良好反应性能的主要原因.具有一定机械强度的无粘结剂ZSM-11分子筛催化剂制备简单,在异丁烯直接胺化过程中叔丁胺生成速率高,具有很好的工业化应用前景.
关键词无粘结剂分子筛     ZSM-11     胺化     异丁烯     叔丁胺    

1 Introduction

Tert-butylamine is an important raw material and pharmaceutical intermediate, and the direct amination of isobutene over zeolite catalysts to give tert-butylamine has been reported to be an environmentally benign and economical process. MFI and BEA have been found to be superior to other materials [1, 2]. Zeolites ZSM-5 and ZSM-11 have similar framework densities and pore sizes, but differences in their channels result in a higher selectivity for aromatics in the aromatization of 1-hexene over ZSM-11 compared with that over ZSM-5 [3]. In the case of the direct amination of isobutene, we found that ZSM-11 showed slightly higher activity than ZSM-5 when using similar crystal size, SiO2/Al2O3 molar ratio and acidity.

Zeolites synthesized by conventional techniques are usually obtained in powder form. However, for practical applications, the zeolite powder should be formed into catalyst particles with a certain shape, size, and mechanical strength by using inert materials as binders [4]. Unfortunately, this causes the reduction of the active zeolite component and blocks part of the channel windows in the formed catalysts, which consequently results in a considerable reduction in the catalytic performance of the zeolites [5]. It would therefore be interesting to prepare a mechanically stable and self-supporting zeolite catalyst, in which the active components are protected, namely, a binderless zeolite catalyst [6].

Self-bonded ZSM-5 pellets are readily prepared at 170 ℃ under hydrothermal conditions from a gel with the following composition: a Li2O : b Na2O : 2b TPABr : b A12O3 : 150 SiO2: 490 H2O, with 8 ≤ a ≤ 9 and 14 ≤ b ≤ 16 (TPABr = tetrapropylammonium bromide). If the Li2O is replaced with Na2O or K2O, only nonpelleted, powdered ZSM-5 samples can be prepared, which underlines the role of the LiAlO2 binder in the system [7]. Recently, shaped binderless ZSM-5 zeolites have been prepared from aluminosilicate extrudates using a dry-gel conversion (DGC) technique, in which the introduction of amines into the steam favored the formation of nanosized ZSM-5 zeolite. Of particular note, the morphology of these aluminosilicate extrudates was retained in the crystallization process [8]. Self-bonded pellets of ZSM-11 with high mechanical resistance could also be obtained from initial gels with a composition of 1 Li2O : (3.25-7.5) Na2O : (3.25-7.5) Al2O3 : 150 SiO2 : (0.65-1.5) TBABr : 490 H2O [9].

TPABr [10], tetrabutylammonium bromide (TBABr) [11] and 1, 6-hexanediamine (HDA) [12] are suitable structure directing agents (SDAs) for the synthesis of ZSM-5, ZSM-11, and ZSM-5/ZSM-11, respectively. However, ZSM-11 synthesized using TBABr and HDA as co-SDAs has not yet been reported. Here, a shaped binderless ZSM-11 catalyst was prepared using the DGC method, using TBABr and HDA as co-SDAs in the synthesis and without adding other alkaline materials. The obtained sample was then employed for the direct amination of isobutene. In addition, the performance of the binderless and binder-containing ZSM-11 catalysts (HZSM-11+Al2O3 and HZSM-11+SiO2) in the amination reaction was compared.

2 Experimental
2.1 Preparation

Na-ZSM-11 zeolite powder with a framework SiO2/Al2O3 molar ratio of 61.6, and containing 2.33 wt% Na2O and 10.4 wt% TBABr was synthesized by following a previously reported procedure [3]. The powder was mixed with silica sol (SiO2: 30 wt%, Na2O: 0.31 wt%) to form a cylindrical extrudate that was 1.8-2.2 mm in diameter and 3-7 mm in length. The dried sample containing 30 wt% of silica was denoted S1. For comparison, S2, which contained 30 wt% of alumina, was prepared by using boehmite instead of silica sol as the binder.

S1 was recrystallized using the DGC method. First, 4 g S1 was placed in a stainless-steel tube fixed and supported in a horizontal position in a stainless-steel autoclave with a Teflon lining. Then 1.2 g HDA and 4 mL deionized water were poured into the bottom of the Teflon-lined autoclave taking care that the solid sample did not come into direct contact with the liquid [13]. The autoclave was heated at 175 ℃ for 10.5 h, and then cooled to room temperature. The solid sample was dried at 120 ℃ for 2 h and then calcined in air at 540 ℃ for 5 h. This sample was denoted S3.

All three samples (S1, S2, and S3) were converted to the protonic form by conventional ion exchange in aqueous NH4NO3 solution [14], followed by calcination (550 ℃, 4 h, air). The resultant samples were denoted Cat-A, Cat-B, and Cat-C, respectively.

2.2 Characterization

The samples were characterized by powder X-ray diffraction (XRD), N2 adsorption-desorption, temperature-programmed desorption of NH3 (NH3-TPD), infrared spectrascopy of adsorbed pyridine (Py-IR), high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) techniques as described elsewhere [15]. The side-pressure strength of the samples was tested using a ZQJ-II intelligent particle strength tester.

2.3 Reaction

The direct amination of isobutene to tert-butylamine was carried out in a stainless-steel fixed-bed reactor and the mode of operation was down-flow. All the samples were pressed, crushed, and sieved to give a particle size of 0.38-0.85 mm before they were loaded into the reactor. Initially, 5 g of the catalyst was loaded into the center of the reactor and pretreated at 500 ℃ for 1 h in N2. The reactor was cooled to 250 ℃, and then liquid NH3 was pumped in from the top to fully fill the reactor before isobutene was introduced. Ma et al. [16, 17] have reported that this feeding sequence is favorable for the reaction. After 2 h, it was confirmed that the NH3/i-C4H8 molar ratio remained stable at 4:1 by measuring the concentrations of the educts, and the products were analyzed on-line with an Agilent 7980B gas chromatograph equipped with a flame ionization detector (FID) and a PONA capillary column.

The isobutene conversion (Cisobutene), tert-butylamine selectivity (Stert-butylamine) and formation rate of tert-butylamine (Vformation) were calculated according to the following equations:

(1)
(2)
(3)

where xtert-butylamine is the molar percentage of tert-butylamine in the products, xC8 is the molar percentage of C8 hydrocarbons in the products, xisobutene is the molar percentage of isobutene in the products, FM isobutene is the molar flow rate of isobutene (μmol/h), and mcat is the mass of the catalyst (g).

3 Results and discussion
3.1 Synthesis of binderless ZSM-11 zeolite catalyst

First, two binder-containing ZSM-11 samples (Cat-A and Cat-B) were prepared, and their XRD patterns are shown in Fig. 1. The relative crystallinity (RC) of the sample was calculated based on the areas of the diffraction peaks at 2θ = 7.9° ± 0.1°, 8.8° ± 0.1°, 23.0° ± 0.1°, 23.8° ± 0.1°, and 45.0° ± 0.1° using pure ZSM-11 in protonic form (HZSM-11), which was assumed to have 100% RC, as a standard. The RC of Cat-A was 69.9%, which is in good agreement with its composition, and that of Cat-B was 63.7%.

Fig. 1. XRD patterns of zeolite samples.

The DGC method uses steam to assist in heating the precursor and converting the amorphous structure to the crystalline form [18].Compared with hydrothermal synthesis, the impact of diffusion on the zeolite growth rate is minimized in the DGC method; this is attributed to the higher rate of diffusion for gases than for liquids. In the DGC process, the solid sample was not in direct contact with water; however, capillary condensation of water vapor usually means that the surface of the amorphous silica gel is covered with a thin layer of water during the steaming treatment [8]. In addition, seed addition can be used for the rapid synthesis of zeolites with controllable crystal size and morphology. Taking these ideas into consideration, we attempted to use the DGC method to prepare a binderless ZSM-11 zeolite catalyst.

The XRD pattern of the Cat-C sample obtained from 4 g of a mixture of ZSM-11 and SiO2, 1.2 g HDA, and 4 mL H2O after reaction at 175 ℃ for 10.5 h is shown in Fig. 1. It contains the typical diffraction pattern of HZSM-11 zeolite, and the RC of Cat-C was 101%, which is similar to that of HZSM-11. The detailed crystallization mechanism will be explored in another manuscript. It is worth noting that no other amines were added to the system during the synthesis except for HDA and TBABr. Generally, amines such as ethylamine and n-butylamine should be added into the DGC process; these amines have two functions: enhancing the alkalinity and acting as SDAs [8].

To confirm the coordination state of the Si species and the percentages of these species contained in the samples, 29Si MAS NMR measurements were carried out and the spectra of various samples are given in Fig. 2. Deconvolution of the spectra of the Cat-A, Cat-C, and HZSM-11 samples showed that they each contained three peaks with chemical shifts centered at approximately δ = −114, −106, and −100. These chemical shifts correspond to Si(4Si), Si(3Si, 1Al), and Si(OH), respectively [19, 20]. Quantitative information regarding the percentages of the different Si species was also obtained from these spectra. The percentages of Si(4Si), Si(3Si, 1Al), and Si(OH) in HZSM-11 were 85.0%, 13.0%, and 2.0%, respectively. After the DGC process, the percentage of Si(3Si, 1Al) changed from 13.0% (Cat-A) to 10.7% (Cat-C), whereas that of Si(4Si) increased only slightly (from 86.1% to 87.6%). The percentage of Si(OH) was between 1.0% and 2.0%. These results suggest that the amorphous SiO2 in Cat-A was transformed into ZSM-11 zeolite in Cat-C, and this resulted in the similar RCs for Cat-C (101%) and HZSM-11 (100%).

Fig. 2. 29Si MAS NMR spectra of three zeolite samples.

HRTEM images (Fig. 3) show that HZSM-11 has relatively regular crystal edges and does not contain any clearly visible amorphous materials. A large amount of amorphous SiO2 was observed around the ZSM-11 in the Cat-A sample, but this phenomenon was hardly observed in Cat-C. The Cat-C sample contained crystal particles with relatively clear and regular shapes and no evidence of amorphous SiO2. The NMR and HRTEM results are thus consistent with the XRD results. Based on the results described above, it could be inferred that the amorphous SiO2 binder in the extrudate was transformed into ZSM-11 in the DGC process, and the shaped binderless zeolite catalyst was therefore synthesized successfully.

Fig. 3. HRTEM images of zeolite samples. (a) HZSM-11; (b) Cat-A; (c) Cat-C; (d) Photograph of Cat-C.

The initial cylindrical shape of the catalyst was retained during the DGC process; Fig. 3 shows a photograph of the Cat-C sample. The side pressure strengths of Cat-A, Cat-B, and Cat-C were 78, 110, and 94 N/cm, respectively, which indicates that Cat-C retained its high mechanical strength after recrystallization. This may be attributed to the formation of a matrix or bridge structure, as reported in Ref. [21]. In this previous study MFI with a low SiO2/A12O3 molar ratio of 80 was mixed with amorphous SiO2 to give small crystals of MFI with a high SiO2/A12O3 molar ratio of 900 using the DGC method. The second type of zeolite particles bound to the first type of zeolite particles by adhering to their surface, thereby forming a matrix or bridge structure. This resulted in zeolite particles with a high mechanical strength.

3.2 Physicochemical properties of ZSM-11 catalysts
Table 1
Textural properties and acidity data for the zeolite samples.

N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms with a steep rise at P/P0 < 0.01 are characteristic of microporous zeolites, and a hysteresis loop at 0.44 < P/P0 < 1 corresponds to the existence of dissimilar mesopores [22]. As shown in Fig. 4, all of the catalysts showed typical type I + IV isotherms. Data on the textural properties of the catalysts are summarized in Table 1.

Fig. 4. N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms for zeolite samples.

In comparison with HZSM-11, Cat-A and Cat-B had lower micropore surface areas and micropore volumes; this was a result of the presence of the amorphous binder (silica or alumina). In contrast, HZSM-11 and Cat-C had similar micropore surface areas and micropore volumes as a result of their similar crystallinities.

The acidity of the catalysts was investigated using the NH3-TPD technique, and the spectra are shown in Fig. 5. Two NH3 desorption peaks were observed in the tested temperature range. The desorption peak temperatures for Cat-B were centered at approximately 250 and 423 ℃, and correspond to weak and strong acid sites, respectively. Those for the other catalysts (HZSM-11, Cat-A, and Cat-C) were centered at approximately 239 and 442 ℃. The total concentration of acid sites followed the order: Cat-B (486 μmol/g) > HZSM-11 (453 μmol/g) > Cat-C (395 μmol/g) > Cat-A (362 μmol/g). The acidity of the sites was then further investigated with the Py-IR technique. The bands at approximately 1540 and 1450 cm−1 were integrated to determine the respective concentrations of Brönsted and Lewis acid sites [23]. Conventionally, the total acidity is determined when pyridine is desorbed at 150 ℃ (Fig. 6(a)), whereas medium and strong (M-S) acidity is obtained when pyridine is desorbed at 300 ℃ (Fig. 6(b)). To determine the concentration of Brönsted and Lewis acid sites (marked CB and CL, respectively), we used the formulae CB = 1.88 IA (B) R2/W and CL = 1.42 IA (L) R2/W [24]. The different strength CB and CL values for each sample are listed in Table 1. Cat-A showed the lowest total and M-S CB; this is ascribed to the diluting effect of SiO2, which reduces the acidity. Owing to the presence of Al2O3, Cat-B displayed the highest CL, whereas HZSM-11 and Cat-C possessed a similar CB. In comparison with that of Cat-A, the CB of Cat-C was increased; this may be the result of the small amount of additional Al being converted into framework Al and replacing Si-OH in HZSM-11.

Fig. 5. NH3-TPD profiles of the zeolite samples.
Fig. 6. Py-IR spectra of the zeolite samples desorbed at 150 ℃ (a) and 300 ℃ (b).
3.3 Catalytic performance over ZSM-11 catalysts by different methods

The performance of the Cat-A, Cat-B, Cat-C, and HZSM-11 catalysts in the direct amination of isobutene was compared, and the isobutene conversion and tert-butylamine selectivity of the four samples are summarized in Table 2.

Table 2
Catalytic performance of zeolite samples in isobutene amination.

Under reaction conditions of 250 ℃, 5.0 MPa, weight hourly space velocity (WHSV) of isobutene of 0.5 h−1, NH3/i-C4H8 molar ration of 4/1 and time-on-stream (TOS) of 6 h, the isobutene conversion was in the range of 10.41%-13.04% over the catalysts employed. Cat-A displayed higher isobutene conversion than Cat-B (12.16% vs 10.41%), and the conversions obtained for the reactions over Cat-C (13.04%) and HZSM-11 (12.93%) were similar. As shown in Table 2, the major product was tert-butylamine (> 99.9%), and the remaining trace components were C8 hydrocarbons. A small amount of oligomerization and isomerization products were observed, but the selectivities for both of these were less than 0.1%. This result is in good agreement with those obtained with H-FAU and H-MOR zeolites. Reaction over these zeolites showed a tert-butylamine selectivity of more than 99% below 280 ℃ with a NH3/i-C4H8 molar ratio of 2 [25]. The H-Y catalyst, under conditions of 260 ℃, 5.2 MPa, and an NH3/i-C4H8 molar ratio of 1, gave an isobutene conversion of 8.9% with a tert-butylamine selectivity of 98% [25, 26]. Furthermore, BASF have commercialized the BEA zeolite catalyst for the direct amination of isobutene; however, this process requires relatively harsh conditions of 270 ℃, 28.0 MPa, and a NH3/i-C4H8 molar ratio of 1.5. In addition the conversion of isobutene was only 22.67% [27].

As shown in Fig. 7, the formation rate of tert-butylamine changed very little over the 6 h reaction time. A similar phenomenon was observed for the MFI zeolites [2]. Furthermore, as shown in Fig. 7, the formation rate of tert-butylamine at TOS = 6 h over the different zeolite samples decreased in the following order: Cat-C (1162 μmol h−1 g−1cat) ≈ HZSM-11 (1152 μmol h−1 g−1cat) > Cat-A (1083 μmol h−1 g−1cat) > Cat-B (927 μmol h−1 g−1cat). HZSM-11 and Cat-C showed similar performance in the isobutene amination reaction, but HZSM-11 is a powder whereas Cat-C is shaped and has high mechanical strength (94 N/cm). Cat-C therefore has the potential for use in industrial applications. Academic and fundamental research studies have been neglected in this field [4] because the design of shaped formulations is generally considered to be a technical process. However, a solid understanding of the relationship between catalytic performance and catalyst structure and composition, including formulation shape, is necessary for the development of practical zeolite catalysts [28].

Fig. 7. Formation rate of tert-butylamine over zeolite samples as a function of time. Reaction conditions: 250 ℃, 5.0 MPa, WHSV (isobutene) = 0.5 h−1, NH3/i-C4H8 = 4/1 (molar ratio).
3.4 Relationship between physicochemical properties and catalytic performance of ZSM-11 catalysts

The textural properties and acidity of ZSM-11 may influence its catalytic performance. First, we will discuss the effect of the textural properties on catalytic performance. As shown in Table 1, ABET decreased in the order HZSM-11 > Cat-C > Cat-B > Cat-A, whereas Amicro decreased in the order Cat-C ≈ HZSM-11 > Cat-B > Cat-A. Vmicro followed the sequence HZSM-11 = Cat-C > Cat-B > Cat-A, and Vmeso decreased in the order Cat-B > HZSM-11 > Cat-A > Cat-C. Thus, the formation rate of tert-butylamine does not appear to show a clear relationship with the textural properties of ZSM-11. Li [29] reported that hierarchical nano-ZSM-5 zeolites with a high surface area showed little improvement in catalytic performance compared with that of nano-ZSM-5 for the direct amination of isobutene to tert-butylamine. This demonstrates that molecular diffusion is not the rate determining step.

Second, we illustrate the effect of acidity on catalytic performance. In our study, the total acid site concentration (determined using NH3-TPD) decreased in the order Cat-B > HZSM-11 > Cat-C > Cat-A. As shown in Table 1, CB decreased in the order HZSM-11 ≈ Cat-C > Cat-B > Cat-A, whereas the order for CL was Cat-B > HZSM-11 > Cat-A > Cat-C, irrespective of the total and M-S acid site concentrations. It could thus be speculated that the formation rate of tert-butylamine is closely related to CB [29-31].However, CL should also be considered. Even if a catalyst has a suitable CB, a high CL may inhibit the formation of the ammonium cation, which reacts with gaseous isobutene. The resulting cationic intermediate, the tert-butyl cation, then reacts with NH3, either adsorbed on the catalyst surface or in the gas phase, and produces chemisorbed tert-butylamine [2, 16].

ZSM-5 is a common catalyst for the direct amination of isobutene, and is considerably affected by the number and strength of Brönsted acid sites [30]. As a result, Ce-modified HZSM-5 catalyst showed improved activity in the amination reaction [31]. Chang et al. [32] reported that the catalytic performance was related to the concentration of medium strength acid sites detected by NH3-TPD.

The relationship between the number of Brönsted acid sites and the SiO2/A12O3 molar ratio was investigated by Mizuno et al. [30]. These authors reported that the amination performance was not simply related to the number of Brönsted acid sites. In our study, the 29Si MAS NMR technique was used to determine the SiO2/Al2O3 molar ratios in the framework of each sample, and these ratios were 61.6, 61.6, 61.8, and 73.0 for HZSM-11, Cat-A, Cat-B, and Cat-C, respectively. Using this information and the results in Table 1, the relationship between the turnover frequency per Brönsted acid site and the SiO2/A12O3 molar ratio of the catalyst was investigated. It was clear that the total turnover frequency could not be expressed by a linear relationship and did not increase on increasing the SiO2/Al2O3 molar ratio of the catalyst framework. This result is not consistent with that reported in Ref. [30].

4 Conclusions

A shaped binderless ZSM-11 zeolite catalyst was successfully prepared using the DGC method in its protonic form (Cat-C). When using suitable synthesis conditions, the concentration of Brönsted acid sites in Cat-C can approach the concentration in HZM-11. Compared with the binder-containing catalysts (Cat-A and Cat-B), Cat-C showed a higher formation rate of tert-butylamine in the direct amination of isobutene. This was a result of the higher concentration of Brönsted acid sites and lower concentration of Lewis acid sites. Because of its high crystallinity and good mechanical strength, the binderless ZSM-11 zeolite catalyst has potential for application in the direct amination of isobutene.

References
[1] W F. Hoelderich, Catal. Today,2000, 62 :115–130. DOI:10.1016/S0920-5861(00)00413-2
[2] M Lequitte, F Figueras, C Moreau, S Hub, J. Catal.,1996, 163 :255–261. DOI:10.1006/jcat.1996.0326
[3] L Zhang, H J. Liu, X J. Li, S J. Xie, Y Z. Wang, W J. Xin, S L. Liu, L Y. Xu, Fuel Process. Technol.,2010, 91 :449–455. DOI:10.1016/j.fuproc.2009.12.003
[4] J Zhou, J W. Teng, L P. Ren, Y D. Wang, Z C. Liu, W Liu, W L. Yang, Z K. Xie, J. Catal.,2016, 340 :166–176. DOI:10.1016/j.jcat.2016.05.009
[5] J Wang, X W. Cheng, J Guo, X C. Chen, H Y. He, Y C. Long, Chin. J. Chem.,2010, 28 :183–188. DOI:10.1002/cjoc.v28:2
[6] J Jänchen, K Schumann, E Thrun, A Brandt, B Unger, U Hellwig, Int. J. Low-Carbon Technol.,2012, 7 :275–279. DOI:10.1093/ijlct/cts037
[7] F Crea, R Aiello, A Nastro, J B. Nagy, Zeolites,1991, 11 :521–527. DOI:10.1016/S0144-2449(05)80129-0
[8] M B. Yue, N Yang, W Q. Jiao, Y M. Wang, M Y. He, Solid State Sci.,2013, 20 :1–7. DOI:10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2013.03.001
[9] P De Luca, F Crea, A Fonseca, J B. Nagy, Microporous Mesoporous Mater.,2001, 42 :37–48. DOI:10.1016/S1387-1811(00)00239-0
[10] A Nastro, C Colella, R Aiello, Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal.,1985, 24 :39–46. DOI:10.1016/S0167-2991(08)65266-0
[11] S Q. Liu, Y N. Li, Z S. Jin, H X. Li, W M. Yang, Adv. Fine Petrochem.,2011, 12 :24–29.
[12] Q. X. Wang, S. R. Zhang, G. Y. Cai, F. Li, L. Y. Xu, Z. X. Huang, Y. Y. Li, US Patent 5869021, 1999.
[13] P R. H. P. Rao, M Matsukata, Chem. Commun.,1996 :1441–1442.
[14] H Zhou, W L. Zhu, L Shi, H C. Liu, S P. Liu, Y M. Ni, Y Liu, Y L. He, S L. Xu, L Li, Z M. Liu, J. Mol. Catal.,2016, 417 :1–9. DOI:10.1016/j.molcata.2016.02.032
[15] H Liu, S J. Xie, W J. Xin, S L. Liu, L Y. Xu, Catal. Sci. Technol.,2016, 6 :1328–1342. DOI:10.1039/C5CY01493J
[16] Y F. Ma, X M. Jin, S Z. Guo, X T. Shu, Y Shu, Petrochem. Technol.,2006, 35 :720–724.
[17] M. Bergfeld, M. Nywlt, US Patent 5648546, 1997.
[18] W Y. Xu, J X. Dong, J P. Li, J Q. Li, F Wu, J Chem. Soc., Chem. Com-mun.,1990 :755–756.
[19] K Y. Leng, Y Wang, C M. Hou, C Lancelot, C Lamonier, A Rives, Y Y. Sun, J. Catal.,2013, 306 :100–108. DOI:10.1016/j.jcat.2013.06.004
[20] B Gil, Ł Mokrzycki, B Sulikowski, Z Olejniczak, S Walas, Catal. Today,2010, 152 :24–32. DOI:10.1016/j.cattod.2010.01.059
[21] G. D. Mohr, T. J. Chen, K. R. Clem, P. A. Ruziska, J. P. Verduijn, US Patent 6198013, 2001.
[22] I I. Ivanova, I A. Kasyanov, A A. Maerle, V I. Zaikovskii, Mi-croporous Mesoporous Mater.,2014, 189 :163–172. DOI:10.1016/j.micromeso.2013.11.001
[23] E P. Parry, J. Catal.,1963, 2 :371–379. DOI:10.1016/0021-9517(63)90102-7
[24] C A. Emeis, J. Catal.,1993, 141 :347–354. DOI:10.1006/jcat.1993.1145
[25] M Deeba, M E. Ford, J. Org. Chem.,1988, 53 :4594–4596. DOI:10.1021/jo00254a039
[26] M Deeba, M E. Ford, T A. Johnson, J Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun.,1987 :562–563.
[27] U. Dingerdissen, R. Kummer, P. Stops, U. Muller, J. Herrmann, K. Eller, US Patent 6143934, 2000.
[28] S Mitchell, N L. Michels, J Pérez-Ramírez, Chem. Soc. Rev.,2013, 42 :6094–6112. DOI:10.1039/c3cs60076a
[29] Q. M. Li,[MS Dissertation], Dalian University of Technology, Da-lian, 2014.
[30] N Mizuno, M Tabata, T Uematsu, M Iwamoto, J. Catal.,1994, 146 :249–256. DOI:10.1016/0021-9517(94)90028-0
[31] X M. Jin, Y F. Ma, S Z. Guo, X T. Shu, X P. He, Petrochem. Technol.,2005, 34 :948–953.
[32] J W. Chang, T J. Fu, H J. Zhang, H Zhou, Z Li, Chin. J. Inorg. Chem.,2015, 31 :2119–2127.