催化学报  2017, Vol. 38 Issue (5): 845-852   PDF    
扩展功能
加入收藏夹
复制引文信息
加入引用管理器
Email Alert
RSS
本文作者相关文章
Kai Qi
Junlin Xie
De Fang
Fengxiang Li
Feng He
Performance enhancement mechanism of Mn-based catalysts prepared under N2 for NOx removal: Evidence of the poor crystallization and oxidation of MnOx
Kai Qia, Junlin Xiea,b,c, De Fanga,b, Fengxiang Lia, Feng Hea,c     
a. State Key Laboratory of Silicate Materials for Architectures, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, Hubei, China;
b. Center for Materials Research and Test, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, Hubei, China;
c. School of Materials Science and Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, Hubei, China
* Corresponding author. Junlin Xie, Tel: +86-27-87651434; Fax: +86-27-87878641; E-mail: xjlclxy@126.com; Feng He, Tel: +86-13871289194; E-mail: he-feng2002@163.com
Abstract: Among multitudinous metal-oxide catalysts for the selective catalytic reduction of NOx with NH3 (NH3-SCR), Mn-based catalysts have become very popular and developed rapidly in recent years because of its superior low-temperature denitrification activity, mainly originating from multi-valence of Mn. Most studies suggest that the catalytic activity of multi-component oxides is superior to that of single-component catalysts owing to the synergistic effect among the metallic elements in such materials, of which more attentions have been given to Ce as an additive owing to its powerful oxygen storage capacity, redox ability and its ready availability. As the core of SCR technology, the research points in catalyst development at the present stage of all researchers in countries mainly centralize on the optimization of active components, carriers, calcination temperature, calcination time and temperature-raising procedure, giving little thought to the effects of the calcination atmosphere. In the present work, Ce-modified Mn-based catalysts were prepared by a simple impregnation method. The effects of the calcination atmosphere (N2, air or O2) on the performance of the resulting materials during NH3-SCR and its causes of the differences were subsequently investigated and characterized using various analytical methods. Data obtained from X-ray diffraction, thermogravimetry and temperature-programmed reduction with hydrogen show that calcination under N2 reduces both the degree of oxidation and crystallization of the MnOx. Scanning electron microscopy also demonstrates that the use of N2 inhibits the growth of grains and increases the dispersion of the catalysts. In addition, the results of temperature-programmed desorption with ammonia indicate that catalysts calcined under N2 exhibit a greater quantity of acid sites. Finally, X-ray photoelectron spectrometry and activity results demonstrate that MnOx in the lower valence states is more favorable for NH3-SCR reactions. In conclusion, catalysts calcined under N2 show superior performance during NH3-SCR for NOx removal, allowing NO conversions up to 94% at 473 K.
© 2017, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Key words: Mn-based catalyst     Selective catalytic reduction     Calcination atmosphere     Mn species     Oxidation degree     Crystallization degree    
N2气氛下焙烧制备的Mn基催化剂催化NOx脱除性能的提升机理:低MnOx结晶度与氧化度
齐凯a, 谢峻林a,b,c, 方德a,b, 李凤祥a, 何峰a,c     
a. 武汉理工大学硅酸盐建筑材料国家重点实验室, 湖北武汉 430070;
b. 武汉理工大学材料研究与测试中心, 湖北武汉 430070;
c. 武汉理工大学材料科学与工程学院, 湖北武汉 430070
摘要:在众多的氧化物类NH3-SCR催化剂体系中, Mn基氧化物催化剂因具有极高的低温 (≤ 473 K) 脱硝性能而备受关注.其主要原因可能是Mn物种具有丰富的可变价态, 作为活性组分的MnOx能够提供自由电子.大量研究发现, 由于不同金属元素间协同作用的存在, 复合金属氧化物的催化脱硝活性普遍优于单金属氧化物类催化剂.为了抑制MnOx在锻烧过程中的烧结, 提高MnOx的催化活性, 一系列过渡金属氧化物, 如Fe, Cu, Ni和Cr等的氧化物, 被用来作为改性剂加入到MnOx催化剂中.近年来, 很多研究者将稀土元素作为改性剂加入到MnOx催化剂中, 并发现稀土金属氧化物的添加可以改善催化剂的活性、选择性、热稳定性及抗毒性能, 是良好的添加助剂, 其中对Ce的关注度颇高.而储氧性能是CeO2最重要的性质, CeO2对氧气的存储和释放可以通过Ce4+和Ce3+两种价态之间的变化实现.文献研究表明, 将CeO2加入到锰氧化物材料中, 能够提高锰氧化物在程序升温脱附过程中氧的脱附量, 并且在低温条件下能够为锰氧化物提供氧, 从而对锰氧化物的氧化态产生影响.此外, 我国拥有丰厚的稀土Ce资源储备, 使得锰铈复合氧化物在吸附脱除NOx方面得到广泛应用. 催化剂作为选择性催化还原 (SCR) 工艺的核心, 现阶段的研究重点主要集中于新型低温高活性催化剂的研究, 如活性组分、载体组分、焙烧温度、焙烧时间及焙烧升温程序等, 这表明焙烧过程对于催化剂性能的重要性.然而, 在催化脱硝领域, 对焙烧气氛的研究极少, 但借鉴其他领域对焙烧气氛的研究, 确有研究者证实焙烧气氛对材料的颗粒大小、缺陷浓度、价态及物相组成等有着显著的影响, 进而影响材料的活性.我们课题组曾研究了焙烧气氛对MnOx/TiO2脱硝性能的影响, 并发现惰性气氛中焙烧的催化剂表现出最佳活性, 然而对于催化剂催化性能增强的原因并未深入探究.在前期研究基础上, 以MnOx和CeOx为活性组分, 采用浸渍法制备得到Ce-Mn/TiO2催化剂, 通过X射线衍射 (XRD)、氢气程序升温还原 (H2-TPR)、热重 (TG)、扫描电子显微镜 (SEM)、氨气程序升温脱附 (NH3-TPD) 和X射线光电子能谱 (XPS) 等表征手段系统地研究了MnOx和CeOx担载于TiO2表面制成的催化剂在不同气氛 (N2, 空气和O2) 中焙烧后的催化性能和物相结构. XRD, TG和H2-TPR测试结果表明, 在N2气氛中焙烧有利于催化剂氧化度与结晶度的降低, 催化剂中主要存在两种主要活性成分:大量的Mn2O3和少量的Mn3O4.SEM图揭示了在N2气氛下焙烧能够有效抑制晶粒长大, 促进颗粒分散.NH3-TPD结果表明, N2气氛下焙烧的催化剂拥有更多的表面酸性位点, 从而有利于反应气在催化剂表面的吸附和活化.结合XPS分析结果与脱硝活性测试结果, 较低价态的MnOx以及较高的表面活性氧浓度 (Oα) 更有利于NH3-SCR反应的进行.不同焙烧气氛下0.20Ce-Mn/TiO2催化剂 (Ce:Ti摩尔比为0.20) 上NO转化率顺序如下:N2(94%) > 空气 (85.6%) > O2 (75.6%).以上结果清晰地表明N2焙烧气氛显著提升了催化剂的脱硝活性.
关键词锰基催化剂    选择性催化还原    焙烧气氛    锰物种    氧化度    结晶度    

1 Introduction

Selective catalytic reduction with ammonia (NH3-SCR) is one of the most mature, reliable and efficient low-temperature NOx removal processes, and has been studied as a means of flue gas denitrification [1]. Manganese oxides (MnOx) have been extensively researched as low-temperature SCR catalysts due to their multivalence, low cost and excellent performance below 473 K [2-4]. Numerous studies have shown that the catalytic activity of multi-component oxides is superior to that of single-component catalysts owing to the synergistic effect among the metallic elements in such materials. To date, many transition metals (including Fe [5-7], Cu [5, 8-10], Ni [5, 11-12] and Cr [5, 7, 9]) have been found to act as modifiers to enhance the catalytic performance of MnOx/TiO2. More recently, catalysts with rare-earth elements as additives have received much attention, with research focusing on CeO2 doping owing to the superior oxygen storage capacity and redox ability of this oxide, along with its ready availability [13-16]. Wu et al. [17] and Sheng et al. [18] have reported that Ce-modified MnOx/TiO2 catalysts exhibit superior NO conversion during NH3-SCR when using CeOx as a promoter. As well, ceria-based solid solutions were synthesized and used as supports to prepare Mn/CeTi for the reduction of NO by NH3-SCR, with NO conversions greater than 90% [19]. Recently, Li et al. [20], Liu et al. [21] and Andreoli et al. [22] have synthesized Mn-Ce mixed oxides using different preparation methods and found that these materials yield high activity during NO conversion in the temperature range of 373 to 473 K. Moreover, Mn-Ce-Ti mixed oxide catalysts were reported to be suitable for practical applications in controlling NOx emissions by Liu et al. [23]. Ce doping has been shown to enhance the surface area of these materials, as well as to improve catalyst dispersion and redox cycles [17-26]. Presently, the development of novel catalysts, which is crucial to the advancement of SCR, is largely focused on the optimization of active components, calcination temperature and calcination time [14-16], thus emphasizing the significance of the calcination process. Nevertheless, research regarding the effects of the calcination atmosphere has been relatively scarce, even though many reports [27-32] suggest that the calcination atmosphere could make a significant difference in terms of the particle sizes, defect concentrations, valence states and phase structures of catalysts, giving rise to variations in catalytic properties. In addition, previous studies conducted by our own group have determined that the calcination atmosphere greatly affects the catalytic activity of MnOx/TiO2catalysts for low-temperature SCR [33, 34].

In the present work, therefore, various characterization methods were adopted to obtain insights into the mechanism by which the performance of Mn-based catalysts is enhanced upon preparation in N2. On the basis of previous research, MnOx and CeOx were chosen as the active components, and Ce-Mn/TiO2 catalysts were prepared by a simple impregnation method. Analyses by X-ray diffraction (XRD), H2-temperature programmed reduction (TPR), thermogravimetry (TG), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), NH3-temperature programmed desorption (TPD) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) were used to systematically investigate the phase structures and physicochemical properties of catalysts calcined under different atmospheres (N2, air or O2). Most importantly, a N2 atmosphere was found to contribute to the reduction of the degree of oxidation and crystallization of catalysts, especially in the case of the MnOx, thus promoting the NH3-SCR reactions.

2 Experimental
2.1 Catalyst preparation

Ce-modified Mn-based catalysts were prepared by the impregnation method. In this process, precursor salts, Mn (CH3COO)2·4H2O (4.9096 g, 0.02 mol) and Ce (NO3)3·6H2O (4.3422 g, 0.01 mol), were dissolved in distilled water (200 mL) to produce a homogeneous solution. Commercial TiO2 (P25, Degussa, 80% anatase and 20% rutile, 4.000 g, 0.05 mol) was subsequently added to the mixture, followed by vigorous stirring at room temperature for 2 h. The resulting solutions were dried in air at 383 K overnight, after which the obtained catalysts were crushed and sieved (60-100 mesh). These samples were calcined under different atmospheres (N2, O2 or air) for 3 h and then pressed into tablets in preparation for activity tests. A calcination temperature of 773 K was selected based on our previous work [34]. The catalysts are denoted herein as 0.20Ce-Mn/TiO2-N2/air/O2, where 0.20 represents the optimal Ce:Ti molar ratio, as previously determined by Fang [35].

2.2 Catalyst characterization

XRD patterns were recorded on a Bruker D8 Advance diffractometer equipped with a Cu Kɑ radiation source (λ = 0.15418 nm), over the scanning range of 10°-80°. The microscopic structures of the catalysts were characterized by SEM (JSM-5610LV, Japan). TG (Discovery, USA) was performed at a heating rate of 10 K/min in N2 from 303 to 1273 K. The surface states of catalysts were analyzed by XPS (ESCALAB 250Xi, USA), calibrated with respect to the C 1s level (284.6 eV) of contaminant carbon.

The H2-TPR and NH3-TPD experiments were conducted using an automated apparatus (TPDRO-1100, USA) equipped with a thermal conductivity detector. Prior to the TPR and TPD measurements, approximately 50 or 150 mg of the sample powder was purged with He at 473 or 773 K, respectively, for 1.5 h to remove physisorbed water and impurities. During H2-TPR, the catalyst powders were reduced under a 5% H2-95% N2 flow while being heated from room temperature to 1073 K at a heating rate of 20 K/min. NH3-TPD data were acquired by saturating samples in pure NH3 for 30 min, followed by flushing with pure He for 1.5 h at 373 K to remove weakly adsorbed NH3. The NH3-TPD profiles were collected from 373 to 773 K at a heating rate of 5 K/min in a He atmosphere.

2.3 NH3-SCR performance

The catalytic activities of the test specimens were evaluated in a fixed-bed catalysis system of our own design, equipped with a temperature-programming controller, as shown in Fig. 1. Catalyst powders (2000 mg) were introduced into a specialized quartz reactor (i.d. 20 mm) in which a simulated gas mixture was able to flow throughout the sample. The typical reactant gas contained 715 × 10-6 NO, 800 × 10-6 NH3, and 3 vol% O2, with N2 as the balance, at a total flow rate of 1120 mL/min. Data collection was performed while the sample temperature was held constant for 30 min until a steady state (that is, equilibrium) was achieved. The effluent from the reactor was monitored online using an off-gas analyzer (Gasboard-3800 P). The NO conversion was calculated as the difference in the NO concentration at the inlet and outlet, divided by the initial NO concentration.

Fig. 1. The catalysis test apparatus and feed gas system.
3 Results and discussion
3.1 NH3-SCR data

The NH3-SCR performance of catalysts calcined under different atmospheres (N2, air or O2) and of used 0.20Ce-Mn/TiO2-N2 as well as the catalytic stability of 0.20Ce-Mn/TiO2-N2 and 0.20Ce-Mn/TiO2-O2 at 453 K is shown in Fig. 2. It is evident that the 0.20Ce-Mn/TiO2-N2 exhibited the highest NO removal, giving 94% NO conversion at 473 K, with excellent stability at a time-on-stream of 16 h. The high conversion was maintained for approximately 10 h, after which a slight decrease in activity is observed (ca. 2% over the next 6 h), primarily as a result of the accumulation of reaction by-products on the catalyst surface, blocking the active centers. Furthermore, no significant differences were found between the fresh and used 0.20Ce-Mn/TiO2-N2. The latter shows similar stability at a time-on-stream of 16 h at 453 K, indicating that these Ce-Mn/TiO2 catalysts are sufficiently stable to allow prolonged use. In comparison, both the 0.20Ce-Mn/TiO2-air and the 0.20Ce-Mn/TiO2-O2 exhibit much poorer performance.

Fig. 2. Effect of calcination atmosphere on the performance of the 0.20Ce-Mn/TiO2 catalyst and variations in stability with time-on-stream over 0.20Ce-Mn/TiO2-N2 and 0.20Ce-Mn/TiO2-O2.
3.2 Phase identification

The contribution of phase composition to the above phenomena was examined by acquiring XRD, TG and H2-TPR data, as presented in Figs. 3 to 5. Fig. 3 shows the XRD patterns of the as-prepared 0.20Ce-Mn/TiO2 powders treated under different atmospheres. Characteristic diffraction peaks corresponding to anatase TiO2 (PDF No. 86-1157), rutile TiO2 (PDF No. 73-1765), Mn3O4 (PDF No. 65-2776), Mn2O3 (PDF No. 65-1798) and CeO2 (PDF No. 65-2975) can be clearly identified. The more intense diffraction peaks in the case of the samples treated under higher oxygen atmospheres suggest that such conditions promote a higher degree of crystallinity. Therefore, it can also be inferred that calcination under N2 is advantageous in terms of producing powders with a low degree of crystallization. In addition, no significant variations were found in the XRD patterns of the 0.20Ce-Mn/TiO2-N2 before and after a time-on-stream of 16 h. These results demonstrate that there were no significant changes in the catalyst composition during use, verifying the superior stability of this material.

Fig. 3. XRD patterns of (a) 0.20Ce-Mn/TiO2-N2, (b) 0.20Ce-Mn/TiO2-air, (c) 0.20Ce-Mn/TiO2-O2, and (d) 0.20Ce-Mn/TiO2-N2 following a time-on-stream of 16 h.

TG measurements were conducted for further analysis of phase composition and thermal stability. Each specimen exhibited a mass loss in the vicinity of 323, 893 and 1050 K, attributed to the removal of physisorbed water/dehydration of surface hydroxyls, transition of MnO2 to Mn2O3 and transition of Mn2O3 to Mn3O4, respectively [36]. Interestingly, the presence of MnO2 can also be inferred from these TG curves, even though MnO2 was not detected in the XRD patterns, potentially because this compound was present at very low levels. However, highly intense XRD peaks corresponding to Mn2O3 and Mn3O4 were clearly generated. It is probable that the majority of the originally formed MnO2 was poorly crystallized or in a highly dispersed state on the TiO2 support [37]. Consequently, the material showed a much low decomposition temperature ( < 773 K). Oddly, the temperatures associated with the transformation of MnO2 to Mn2O3 and Mn3O4 in the TG curves are much higher than 773 K. This can be explained by noting that the calcination process spanned 3 h, during which the samples were maintained at 773 K. As a result, there was sufficient time and energy for further transformation, such that Mn2O3 was detected in the XRD and TG data. Because the TG measurements were performed at a heating rate of 10 K/min, there was likely a lag between the catalyst transformation and the temperature increase. Therefore, the presence of MnO2 in the TG curves could be ascribed to a very small amount of MnO2 that remained intact during the catalyst preparation. What is most deserving of attention is the observation that the temperatures for the transition of Mn2O3 to Mn3O4 following calcination in O2, air and N2 decreased successively, while the proportional mass losses increased. This suggests more highly amorphous catalysts and an inclination to the formation of Mn2O3 in oxygen-depleted environments.

Fig. 4. TG-DTG profiles of (a) 0.20Ce-Mn/TiO2-N2, (b) 0.20Ce-Mn/TiO2-air, and (c) 0.20Ce-Mn/TiO2-O2.

Fig. 5 presents the H2-TPR profiles of catalysts calcined under different atmospheres. Two hydrogen-consumption peaks, centered around 554 and 702 K, are evident, corresponding to fractional reductions of MnOx [8, 38]. The ratios of the former reduction peak area to the latter are 0.72, 0.75 and 0.87, respectively. Based on the theoretical oxygen loss in each step (Equation (1)), the area ratios should be 0.5 if only Mn2O3was present in the catalysts and 1 for the reduction of MnO2 (MnO2 → Mn2O3 → MnO). Hence, we propose that Mn2O3 was the main phase and that some small amount of MnO2 was also present in the catalysts, which is in good agreement with the TG results. The first peak is attributed to overlapped peaks associated with the reductions of MnO2 to Mn2O3 and Mn2O3 to Mn3O4, while the other is due to the reduction of Mn3O4 to MnO. As expected, changes in the calcination atmosphere led to variations in both the areas and locations of the reduction peaks. In particular, the light-off temperatures moved to lower values as the amount of oxygen in the calcination atmosphere was lowered. This result confirmed the significantly enhanced redox properties of catalysts calcined under N2. An oxygen-deprived atmosphere may lead to the formation of more oxygen vacancies and crystal lattice defects (Equation (2)), thereby promoting the adsorption of reactants and the transition of Ti4+ to Ti3+ [39] and Ce4+ to Ce3+ [40]. In addition, the lower crystallinity identified by XRD also contributed to the lower reduction temperatures. Another distinct difference is the presence of less intense reduction peaks, especially at lower temperatures, in the N2 sample data compared with the samples treated under O2 or air. These data demonstrate a sequential decrease in average degree of oxidation of the MnOx. It therefore appears that lower oxidation states of MnOx tend to favor the SCR reactions.

Fig. 5. H2-TPR profiles of (a) 0.20Ce-Mn/TiO2-N2, (b) 0.20Ce-Mn/TiO2-air, and (c) 0.20Ce-Mn/TiO2-O2.
(1)
(2)

Based on the XRD, TG and TPR data, the as-prepared catalysts primarily consisted of Mn2O3with small amounts of amorphous MnO2 and crystalline Mn3O4. Similar conclusions have also been reported by previous studies [33, 38, 41].

3.3 Surface analysis

The morphologies of the catalyst powders were observed by SEM, as shown in Fig. 6. Both well-dispersed and much smaller particles are evident in the materials calcined under N2 or air. NH3-TPD was employed to study the surface acidity of the 0.20Ce-Mn/TiO2 catalysts prepared under different atmospheres, and the results are provided in Fig. 7. The continuous desorptions of ammonia species resulting from NH3 adsorption on weak acid sites (433 and 513 K) and moderate acid sites (573 K), both of which are of vital importance to low-temperature catalytic activities throughout the entire range of testing temperatures, were observed [42]. Comparing the integrated areas of the NH3 adsorption peaks (indicated under each curve), the highest NH3 adsorption capacity and therefore greatest acidity was found in the case of those catalysts calcined under N2. This result is in accordance with the SEM image, which shows that catalysts without agglomeration can provide more active sites. In particular, a greater quantity of moderate acid sites can provide many more active sites for the adsorption and activation of NH3, both of which are crucial factors determining the catalytic activity of NH3-SCR [43-45].

Fig. 6. SEM images of (a) 0.20Ce-Mn/TiO2-N2, (b) 0.20Ce-Mn/TiO2-air, and (c) 0.20Ce-Mn/TiO2-O2.
Fig. 7. NH3-TPD profiles of (a) 0.20Ce-Mn/TiO2-N2, (b) 0.20Ce-Mn/TiO2-air, and (c) 0.20Ce-Mn/TiO2-O2.

With the aid of XPS, changes in the oxidation states of surface metals and oxygen species were determined, as shown in Fig. 8 (which has been processed by peak-fitting). Fig. 8(a) shows the characteristic Mn 2p1/2 and Mn 2p3/2 peaks, with the Mn 2p3/2 peak split into three: 640.0-640.3 eV for Mn2+, 641.0-641.3 eV for Mn3+ and 643.2-643.8 eV for Mn4+ [8, 27]. Complex Ce 3d spectra are presented in Fig. 8(b), separated into eight components. Here, the peaks labeled as u and v correspond to 3d3/2 and 3d5/2 with the peaks denoted by u, u′′, u′′′, v, v′′ and v′′′ originating from Ce4+ and the u′ and v′ peaks relating to Ce3+ [46]. Fig. 8(c) shows the O 1s spectra with two fitted peaks for lattice oxygen (Oβ) adsorption, centered at 528.7-529.0 eV, and chemical oxygen (Oα) adsorption, centered at 530-530.6 eV [47].

Fig. 8. (a) Mn 2p, (b) Ce 3d, and (c) O 1s XPS spectra of (1) 0.20Ce-Mn/TiO2-N2, (2) 0.20Ce-Mn/TiO2-air, and (3) 0.20Ce-Mn/TiO2-O2.

As can be seen in Figs. 8(a) and (b), the positions of the characteristic Mn and Ce peaks are shifted to the right, indicating lower binding energies. Significantly, the intensities of the Ce3+ (u′, v′) peaks are increased, thus increasing the Ce3+/(Ce3+ + Ce4+) ratio in O2, air and N2. These data demonstrate that Mn and Ce metal oxides with lower valences, which are believed to promote electron transfer and so to facilitate the redox cycles in the SCR process, are obtained via calcination under air or N2 atmospheres. The results discussed above can also be ascribed to increases in the concentrations of oxygen vacancies induced by low-oxygen calcination conditions, on the basis of the electroneutrality principle evident in Equation (2). This effect further favors the adsorption and activation of reactant gases on the catalyst surface. More detailed information derived from peak-fitting of the XPS data are provided in Table 1. When the treatment atmosphere is changed from O2 to air and then to N2, the Mn4+/(Mn3+ + Mn2+) ratio evidently decreases, while the Oα/(Oα + Oβ) ratio increases. This result confirms the lower degree of oxidation of MnOx and the facilitated formation of oxygen vacancies under N2. It has been reported that the formation of oxygen species (Oα) is due to the presence of surface oxygen vacancies [48]. In the present study, we believe that oxygen adspecies were located at the surface oxygen vacancies of MnOx, CeOx or TiOx. This result is in good agreement with the O 1s XPS investigations. Chemisorbed oxygen (Oα) has been reported to be the most active oxygen species and to play a critical role in redox cycles [49]. Therefore, catalysts calcined under N2 possess a greater ability to oxidize NO to produce NO2, thereby promoting the "fast SCR" reaction [50, 51]. Moreover, NO2 is considered to be a highly reactive intermediate in NH3-SCR [52-54]. The analyses in this work suggest that a N2 atmosphere is advantageous to the formation of species helpful to the SCR reactions, which once again is in good agreement with the observed activities of Ce-Mn/TiO2 specimens prepared in N2, air and O2.

Table 1
The effects of calcination atmosphere on the distributions of Mn and O species.
4 Conclusions

The NO conversion efficiencies over 0.20Ce-Mn/TiO2 samples calcined under different atmospheres varied significantly, decreasing in the order N2 (94%) > air (85.6%) > O2 (75.6%). Thus, the 0.20Ce-Mn/TiO2-N2 showed the highest catalytic ability. The two main active components required for the NH3-SCR reactions, Mn2O3 and Mn3O4, were detected in this material. More importantly, the enhanced surface acidity, increased active oxygen (Oα) content and higher particle dispersion of the 0.20Ce-Mn/TiO2-N2 were also found to contribute to its superior performance. This work demonstrates that catalysts with metals in low valence states and well-distributed active components will more readily adsorb NH3 and NOx on their surfaces, thereby promoting NO conversions. In general, catalysts calcined under N2 are evidently more active with regard to catalyzing the NH3-SCR of NOx.

References
[1] P. Forzatti, Appl. Catal. A, 2001, 222: 221–236. DOI:10.1016/S0926-860X(01)00832-8
[2] B. J. Wu, X. Q. Liu, S. G. Wang, L. Zhu, L. Y. Cao, J. Combust. Sci. Technol., 2008, 14: 221–226.
[3] J. F. Zhang, H. J. Li, Z. Q. Tong, Y. Huang, S. A. Li, Natur. Sci. J. Xiangtan Univ., 2011, 33(2): 65–72, 77.
[4] Z. B. Wu, B. Q. Jiang, Y. Liu, H. Q. Wang, R. B. Jin, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2007, 41: 5812–5817. DOI:10.1021/es0700350
[5] Z. B. Wu, B. Q. Jiang, Y. Liu, Appl. Catal. B, 2008, 79: 347–355. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2007.09.039
[6] M. Kantcheva, J. Catal., 2001, 204: 479–494. DOI:10.1006/jcat.2001.3413
[7] B. J. Wu, W. B. Zhu, J. Ma, C. Xu, C. W. Jiang, L. Lü, Thermal Power Generation, 2010, 39(12): 23–28, 34.
[8] D. Fang, J. L. Xie, D. Mei, Y. M. Zhang, F. He, X. Q. Liu, Y. M. Li, RSC Adv., 2014, 4: 25540–25551. DOI:10.1039/c4ra02824d
[9] P. G. Smirniotis, D. A. Peña, B. S. Uphade, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2001, 40: 2479–2482. DOI:10.1002/(ISSN)1521-3773
[10] W. G. Pan, J. N. Hong, R. T. Guo, W. L. Zhen, H. L. Ding, Q. Jin, C. G. Ding, S. Y. Guo, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 2014, 20: 2224–2227. DOI:10.1016/j.jiec.2013.09.054
[11] B. Thirupathi, P. G. Smirniotis, Appl. Catal. B, 2011, 110: 195–206. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2011.09.001
[12] H. Hu, J. L. Xie, D. Fang, H. F. Cui, Z. Zhang, D. Mei, F. He, J. Wuhan Univ. Technol., 2015, 37(2): 5–10.
[13] Y. Xu, D. J. Yan, X. M. Huang, Y. Yu, S. J. Liu, Chin. J. Environ. Eng., 2015, 9: 862–866.
[14] D. J. Yan, Y. Xu, X. M. Huang, Y. Yu, S. J. Liu, Acta Sci. Circum., 2015, 35: 1697–1702.
[15] Y. X. Wu, H. T. Kao, J. R. Fang, B. X. Lei, L. Wang, Mater. Rev., 2014, 28(4): 75–79.
[16] K. Shen, Y. P. Zhang, X. L. Wang, H. T. Xu, K. Q. Sun, C. C. Zhou, J. Energy Chem., 2013, 22: 617–623. DOI:10.1016/S2095-4956(13)60081-9
[17] Z. B. Wu, R. B. Jin, Y. Liu, H. Q. Wang, Catal. Commun., 2008, 9: 2217–2220. DOI:10.1016/j.catcom.2008.05.001
[18] Z. Y. Sheng, Y. F. Hu, J. M. Xue, X. M. Wang, W. P. Liao, J. Rare Earths, 2012, 30: 676–682. DOI:10.1016/S1002-0721(12)60111-2
[19] Y. Xiong, C. J. Tang, X. J. Yao, L. Zhang, L. L. Li, X. B. Wang, Y. Deng, F. Gao, L. Dong, Appl. Catal. A, 2015, 495: 206–216. DOI:10.1016/j.apcata.2015.01.038
[20] L. Li, Y. F. Diao, X. Liu, J. Rare Earths, 2014, 32: 409–415. DOI:10.1016/S1002-0721(14)60086-7
[21] Z. M. Liu, Y. Yi, S. X. Zhang, T. L. Zhu, J. Z. Zhu, J. G. Wang, Catal. Today, 2013, 216: 76–81. DOI:10.1016/j.cattod.2013.06.009
[22] S. Andreoli, F. A. Deorsola, R. Pirone, Catal. Today, 2015, 253: 199–206. DOI:10.1016/j.cattod.2015.03.036
[23] Z. M. Liu, J. Z. Zhu, J. H. Li, L. L. Ma, S. I. Woo, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2014, 6: 14500–14508. DOI:10.1021/am5038164
[24] G. Qi, R. T. Yang, R. Chang, Catal. Lett., 2003, 87: 67–71. DOI:10.1023/A:1022809328087
[25] L. Xu, X. S. Li, M. Crocker, Z. S. Zhang, A. M. Zhu, C. Shi, J. Mol. Catal. A, 2013, 378: 82–90. DOI:10.1016/j.molcata.2013.05.021
[26] X. Q. Wang, A. J. Shi, Y. F. Duan, J. Wang, M. Q. Shen, Catal. Sci. Technol., 2012, 2: 1386–1395. DOI:10.1039/c2cy20140b
[27] G. J. Wang, Chem. React. Eng. Technol., 2013, 29: 157–163.
[28] L. Y. Bai, Y. M. Zhou, Y. W. Zhang, H. Liu, X. L. Sheng, Y. Z. Duan, Catal. Commun., 2009, 10: 2013–2017. DOI:10.1016/j.catcom.2009.07.020
[29] H. Slimen, H. Lachheb, S. Qourzal, A. Assabbane, A. Houas, J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 2015, 3: 922–929. DOI:10.1016/j.jece.2015.02.017
[30] X. Yan, X. D. Lü, X. Wang, C. H. Luan, J. C. Fan, W. Huang, Nat. Gas Chem. Ind., 2015, 40: 33–38.
[31] R. Klaysri, S. Wichaidit, T. Tubchareon, S. Nokjan, S. Piticharoenphun, O. Mekasuwandumrong, P. Praserthdam, Ceram. Int., 2015, 41: 11409–11417. DOI:10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.05.104
[32] E. W. Wang, L. Hu, S. M. Lei, S. J. Zhang, S. C. Zhang, W. Q. Gong, Appl. Clay Sci., 2015, 118: 138–150. DOI:10.1016/j.clay.2015.08.040
[33] J. L. Xie, D. Fang, F. He, J. F. Chen, Z. B. Fu, X. L. Chen, Catal. Commun., 2012, 28: 77–81. DOI:10.1016/j.catcom.2012.08.022
[34] D. Fang, F. He, J. L. Xie, Z. B. Fu, J. F. Chen, J. Wuhan Univ. Technol. Mater. Sci. Ed., 2013, 28: 888–892. DOI:10.1007/s11595-013-0787-1
[35] D. Fang, [Ph D Dissertation], Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan, 2015.
[36] E. R. Stobbe, B. A. de Boer, J. W. Geus, Catal. Today, 1999, 47: 161–167. DOI:10.1016/S0920-5861(98)00296-X
[37] R. D. Zhang, H. Alamdari, S. Kaliaguine, Appl. Catal. A, 2008, 340: 140–151. DOI:10.1016/j.apcata.2008.02.028
[38] D. Fang, J. L. Xie, H. Hu, H. Yang, F. He, Z. B. Fu, Chem. Eng. J., 2015, 271: 23–30. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2015.02.072
[39] L. B. Xiong, J. L. Li, B. Yang, Y. Yu, J. Nanomater., 2012, 2012(5-8): 9.
[40] Y. Izumi, Y. Iwata, K. I. Aika, J. Phys. Chem., 1996, 100: 9421–9428. DOI:10.1021/jp952602o
[41] M. Stanciulescu, G. Caravaggio, A. Dobri, J. Moir, R. Burich, J. P. Charland, P. Bulsink, Appl. Catal. B, 2012, 123-124: 229–240. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2012.04.012
[42] Q. Li, X. X. Hou, H. S. Yang, Z. X. Ma, J. W. Zheng, F. Liu, X. B. Zhang, Z. Y. Yuan, J. Mol. Catal. A, 2012, 356: 121–127. DOI:10.1016/j.molcata.2012.01.004
[43] Q. Y. Liu, Z. Y. Liu, C. Y. Li, Chin. J. Catal., 2006, 27: 636–646. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(06)60035-1
[44] Q. Li, H. S. Yang, F. M. Qiu, X. B. Zhang, J. Hazard. Mater., 2011, 192: 915–921. DOI:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.05.101
[45] W. Tian, H. S. Yang, X. Y. Fan, X. B. Zhang, J. Hazard. Mater., 2011, 188: 105–109. DOI:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.01.078
[46] M. Romeo, K. Bak, J. El, . Fallah, F. Le, . Normand, L. Hilaire, Surf. Interface Anal., 1993, 20: 508–512. DOI:10.1002/(ISSN)1096-9918
[47] M. Kang, E. D. Park, J. M. Kim, J. E. Yie, Appl. Catal. A, 2007, 327: 261–269. DOI:10.1016/j.apcata.2007.05.024
[48] F. Wang, H. X. Dai, J. G. Deng, G. M. Bai, K. M. Ji, Y. X. Liu, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2012, 46: 4034–4041. DOI:10.1021/es204038j
[49] X. Gao, Y. Jiang, Y. Zhong, Z. Y. Luo, K. F. Cen, J. Hazard. Mater., 2010, 174: 734–739. DOI:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.09.112
[50] C. J. Tang, H. L. Zhang, L. Dong, Catal. Sci. Technol., 2016, 6: 1248–1264. DOI:10.1039/C5CY01487E
[51] G. Qi, R. T. Yang, R. Chang, Appl. Catal. B, 2004, 51: 93–106. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2004.01.023
[52] G. Qi, R. T. Yang, Appl. Catal. B, 2003, 44: 217–225. DOI:10.1016/S0926-3373(03)00100-0
[53] Z. X. Ma, H. S. Yang, Q. Li, J. W. Zheng, X. B. Zhang, Appl. Catal. A, 2012, 427-428: 43–48. DOI:10.1016/j.apcata.2012.03.028
[54] X. D. Huang, Z. X. Ma, W. H. Lin, F. Liu, H. S. Yang, Catal. Commun., 2017, 91: 53–56. DOI:10.1016/j.catcom.2016.11.028