催化学报  2017, Vol. 38 Issue (7): 1102-1107   PDF    
扩展功能
加入收藏夹
复制引文信息
加入引用管理器
Email Alert
RSS
本文作者相关文章
Chaofeng Zhang
Feng Wang
Sell a dummy:Adjacent functional group modification strategy for the catalytic cleavage of lignin β-O-4 linkage
Chaofeng Zhang, Feng Wang    
State Key Laboratory of Catalysis, Dalian National Laboratory for Clean Energy, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Dalian 116023, Liaoning, China
* Corresponding author. Feng Wang, Tel/Fax: +86-411-84379762; Email:wangfeng@dicp.ac.cn
声东击西:针对木质素β-O-4连接结构裂解的邻近基团转化策略
张超锋, 王峰    
中国科学院大连化学物理研究所催化基础国家重点实验室, 洁净能源国家实验室(筹), 辽宁大连 116023
摘要:木质素作为一种潜在可替代石油制备芳香化合物的可再生资源,其转化利用一直受到广泛的关注.在多种木质素链接结构中,β-O-4连接占40%~60%,因此被认为是木质素降解转化过程中需要被首先断裂的结构.近来,相比于直接研究真实木质素的复杂转化过程,另外一种通过研究木质素模型分子转化规律的“自下而上策略”已经为木质素转化提供了许多新的转化思路及组合策略.本文对这些组合策略进行了简要的总结,并提出了更具概括性的“声东击西策略”.简要地说,通过预先转化目标Cα-Cβ及Cβ-OAr键的邻近化学基团,从而降低目标化学键的键解离能或在底物分子中引入“底物位点”,进一步促进目标化学键的高效选择性转化.以底物分子到中间体分子的角度分析,将Cα-OH转化为Cα=O可有效降低目标化学键Cβ-OAr的键解离能,针对这一点,本文介绍了“氧化-(光催化)还原策略”,“内转氢策略”以及“氧化-选择性加氢策略”.同时,针对降低目标化学键的思路,本文还从底物分子到中间体分子碎片角度分析介绍了“脱羟-加氢策略”.针对向底物分子中引入“底物位点”的思路,本文首先介绍了“氧化-氧化策略”,将Cα-OH转化为Cα=O虽然增加了Cα-Cβ键的BDE,但与Cα=O相连的Cβ位点脱氢后可与高活性氧物种结合,从而更有效的裂解Cα-Cβ键.此外,本文简要介绍了类似情况下的过氧物种进攻Cα=O的“氧化-BV氧化策略”,以及“直接酸解策略”和“氧化-脱水-酸解策略”.虽然目前针对木质素β-O-4连接结构的转化策略已有较多的报道,但仍然存在着很多值得探索的可能性,该“声东击西策略”可能为进一步的高效反应路径设计,催化剂筛选及机理研究提供指导.同时,这种邻近基团预转化的策略也能为防止木质素再聚提供方案,从而促进真实木质素的高效转化.

Making a feint to the east and attacking in the west.

------Huainanzi·Bingluexun

The world relies on nonrenewable fossil resources, which provide various fuels, chemicals and materials. Biomass is another storage form of carbon and solar energy that has attracted great interest, mainly because of its potential as a sustainable source of chemicals and fuels[1, 2]. Lignin is an attractive biomass feedstock. As shown in Fig. 1, three phenylpropane units assemble into lignin with a complex three-dimensional structure and different linkages in plants [3]. Lignin is regarded as an alternative resource to oil for preparing aromatics. Although different lignin has different linkages distributions, β-O-4 linkage is the most abundant in both softwood and hardwood lignin. Therefore, selective cleaving of β-O-4 linkage has become a hot topic in the past several years [1, 2].

Fig. 1. Common lignin linkages and their approximate abundance in softwood and hardwood lignin.

In recent years, studies have been directed towards the depolymerization of native lignin residing in wood. These reactions are performed at high temperature in hydrocarbon solvents. The product contains lignin fragments, aromatics and cyclohexane derivatives. In 2013, we reported for the first time that methanol was a suitable solvent for converting native birch lignin over a nickel supported on activated carbon (Ni/AC) catalyst via a fragmentation-hydrogenolysis process [4]. Our further work showed that Ni catalysts could also catalyze the hydrogenolysis of lignin sulfonate with a high content of sulfur to aromatics in ethanediol [5]. Since then, more studies have shown that an alcohol solvent was a preferred choice for native lignin conversion. As well as the outstanding performance of Ni/AC catalyst prepared by carbothermic reduction in an alcohol solvent [4, 5], we have also shown that the unique structure of Ni/AC has an obvious effect on the conversion route of lignin depolymerization [6]. However, the native lignin conversion process is overwhelmingly complex, which obstructs further works to promote the catalytic ability of known catalysts.

Different from the approach of the direct depolymerization of native lignin, another protocol termed bottom-up focuses on the mechanism of cleaving the typical C-O or C-C bonds in lignin model compounds at the molecular level. Although there is a vast difference between studies on model compounds and studies on native lignin, because of the complex lignin structure, the bottom-up approach has presented many effective catalytic systems and strategies in the native lignin conversion.

Selective cleaving of basic Cα-Cβ or Cβ-OAr bonds in the β-O-4 lignin model can obtain two phenyl units. To achieve this goal, different methods focusing on new reaction routes have been reported in the past 8 years. During this period, our group has performed some studies on the β-O-4 lignin model conversion. Our strategy is to "sell a dummy" on the lignin structure. (Note: As the Huainanzi·Bingluexun quote says, "Sell a dummy" means making a feint on the east and attacking in the west.) Our strategies mainly begin with adjacent functional group modification (AFGM, Fig. 2), which can directly decrease the bond dissociation enthalpy (BDE) of targeted bonds or introduce new "substrate sites" for further conversion. These two ideas combining with appropriate catalytic systems can make the conversion of β-O-4 lignin model efficient and selective.

Fig. 2. Strategy of adjacent functional group modification (AFGM) for the cleavage of basic Cα-Cβ and Cβ-OAr bonds in β-O-4 lignin linkage. The bond dissociation enthalpy (BDE) values of Cα-Cβ and Cβ-OAr refer to the compounds with Ar1 = Ar2 = -C6H5.

As shown in Fig. 2, the first oxidation of Cα-OH to Cα=O (β-O-4 alcohol→ I-1) can reduce about 90 kJ/mol BDE of the Cβ-OAr bond [7]. Thus, the Cβ-OAr bond connected with a Cα=O can be cleaved easily with metal powders in an acid solution via an uncatalyzed process [8]. The reductive species could be the H+ and e- generated from the reaction of metal and acid. To cleave the Cβ-OAr bond in a catalytic process, we used TiO2 with an abundance of Ti3+ on the surface to efficiently catalyze the photocleavage of the Cβ-OAr bond in β-O-4 lignin ketones models with H+ and e- under 365 nm irradiation [9], during which sodium acetate promotes the generation of H+ from the consumption of ethanol (Fig. 3). In addition, the Pd/ZnIn2S4 can catalyze the photocatalytic oxidation of Cα-OH in β-O-4 alcohols to Cα=O with 455 nm light.

Fig. 3. Proposed reaction mechanism for photocatalytic Cβ-OAr bond cleavage of β-O-4 ketones over the Ti3+-TiO2. The figure was adapted from Ref. [9], Copyright © 2016 American Chemical Society.

To achieve the first transformation of Cα-OH to Cα=O and the consequent hydrogenolysis or reduction cleavage of Cβ-OAr bond, besides the first selective oxidation [8, 10], the transfer-hydrogenation process could be an atom economical method [11-14]. We have shown that Pd/C catalyzes the transformation of β-O-4 lignin model to phenol and ketone via a dehydrogenation-hydrogenation process, and performed density functional theory calculations to investigate the cleavage mechanism of the Cβ-OAr ether bond in 2-phenoxy-1-phenylethanol over the Pd(111) surface [15]. The favorable reaction pathway (Fig. 4, in red) proceeds as follows: the lignol 2a is first dehydrogenated to generate its corresponding ketone 2e; the ketone continues to dehydrogenate on the Cβ by a first equilibrated keto-enol tautomerization to its enol form 2f and then -OH dehydrogenation; the Cβ-OAr ether bond cleavage happens afterward, leading to surface intermediates (1j and 1d) followed by hydrogenation to yield acetophenone and phenol.

Fig. 4. Reaction network for the β-O-4 bond cleavage of 2-phenoxy-1-phenylethanol over Pd(111) surface. The figure was adapted from Ref. [15], Copyright © 2016 American Chemical Society.

Because there are other ether linkages (α-O-4, 4-O-5) present without an adjacent hydroxyl group to provide an active hydrogen, converting lignin via oxidation-hydrogenation strategy is still a feasible method. However, the uncontrolled hydrogenation system can catalyze the hydrogenation of aromatic rings, and the ketone can hydrogenate back to alcohol before the Cβ-OAr cleavage. Thus, the hydrogenation system should prefer to catalyze the cleavage of Cβ-OAr rather than hydrogenate the Cα=O bond or aromatic rings. We have shown that NiMo sulfide is an appropriate catalyst for this purpose (Fig. 5) [16]. Because the hydrogenative edge Mo sites of MoS2 are in a linear arrangement (Fig. 5(D)) and the Mo sites are the active sites to cleave Cβ-OAr bonds, there are few Mo sites available as side reaction centers for the hydrogenation of aromatic rings, which leads to a high yield of aromatic rings. Furthermore, if the edge Mo atoms are partly replaced by the less active Ni2+, the potential side reaction sites of Cα=O hydrogenation can be reduced, and the yield of aromatic products generated from the cleavage of Cβ-OAr bond increases. Besides the transformation of lignin model compounds, the yield of phenolic monomers from birch wood is up to 32% using this two-step strategy.

Fig. 5. Conversion of birch powder to aromatic phenolic monomers via an oxidation-hydrogenation strategy; The density functional theory adsorption models of 2-phenoxy-1-phenylethan-1-one on Pd(111) (B), Ni(111) (C) and MoS2 (Mo edge) (D). The figure was adapted from Ref. [16], Copyright © 2017 American Chemical Society.

For the transformation of β-O-4 lignin model, different catalytic routes contain different intermediaries, which can cause variations in the Cβ-OAr ether bond cleavage. The dominating factor for the Cβ-OAr bond cleavage should contain the target bond BDE of the original substrate and one of the activated intermediates [17]. In an ideal route for cleaving the β-O-4 linkage, an activated intermediate is generated after a series of activation steps with low activation energy, whose target bond has a lower energy and easily breaks in the subsequent transformations. Analyzing from the substrate molecule to an intermediate molecule, the first dehydrogenation or oxidation of β-O-4 alcohols (Cα-OH) to β-O-4 ketones (Cα=O) has provided many efficient strategies in the β-O-4 linkage cleavage. Because the conversion of a lignin linkage model always contains fragments (radical, cation or anion), analyzing from the substrate molecule to a potential intermediate fragment may present more efficient strategies.

Combined with density functional theory calculation, we have shown that the formation of β-O-4 radical after losing a hydroxyl group at Cα can greatly decrease the Cβ-OAr BDE from 247.9 to 45.3 kJ/mol, facilitating its cleavage (Fig. 2). In the hydrogenation of lignin β-O-4 model, we proposed an efficient dehydroxylation-hydrogenation strategy for the Cβ-OPh bond cleavage over a NiMo sulfide catalyst (Fig. 6) [17], which is not via Cβ-OPh ether bond direct cleavage nor Cα-OH dehydrogenation to Cα=O before the subsequent transformation. The β-O-4-A loses a hydroxyl group (Cα-OH) at weak and medium strong acid sites of the catalyst. The generated PhCHδ+CH2OPh transforms to PhCH·CH2OPh by obtaining an electron from the catalyst redox cycle. Because the possible intermediate PhCH·CH2OPh has a much lower Cβ-OPh bond BDE than β-O-4-A, the Cβ-OAr bond breaks easily and generates styrene, ethylbenzene, phenol and various ether products under a hydrogenation condition with an alcohol solvent. Toste et al. [18] reported a vanadium-catalyzed non-oxidative mechanism, and Goldman et al. [19] reported an iridium-catalyzed dehydroaryloxylation mechanism for the Cβ-OAr cleavage, in which the Cα radical or Cα-M species was the key intermediate. However, this effect of Cα radical or Cα-M species generation on the BDE change in Cβ-OAr bonds drew little attention in subsequent studies.

Fig. 6. Potential dihydroxylation-hydrogenation strategy for β-O-4-A conversion over the NiMo sulfide catalyst. The figure was adapted from Ref. [17], Copyright © 2016 The Royal Society of Chemistry.

As well as the widely-used methods that focus on reducing the BDE of the target bonds to cleave the lignin linkage, establishing a feasible and controllable reaction route is also a valuable premise to achieve this goal. Modifying the substrate during the pretreatment or reaction process is a common approach to establish the desired reaction route. In some situations, these pre-modifications can cause the increase of the targeted bond BDE, but these methods can introduce new substrate sites on the substrates for further conversion.

As shown in Fig. 2, the first oxidation of Cα-OH to Cα=O (β-O-4 alcohol → Ⅱ-1) can cause the increase of Cα-Cβ BDE by 30 kJ/mol, but the H of the new generated Cβ-H can be easily abstracted, and the Cβ can work as the substrate site to react with active oxygen species or other cleavage reagent, causing the cleavage of Cα-Cβ bond. In our recent work, we showed that Cu(OAc)2/1, 10-phenanthroline[20] and Cu(OAc)2/BF3·OEt2[21] were effective catalysts in cleaving Cα-Cβ bonds in β-O-4 ketones, yielding acids, esters and phenols. In-depth studies showed that Cβ-H bond activation was the rate determining step, and the substrate site Cβ reacted with active oxygen species, generating an Cβ-O-Cu2 intermediate (Fig. 7(A)) or an oxygen-centered radical (Fig. 7(B)) and causing the cleavage of the Cα-Cβ bond.

Fig. 7. Cu-catalyzed Cα-Cβ bond oxidized cleavage of lignin β-O-4 model compounds. The figure was adapted from Ref. [20, 21], Copyright © 2016 American Chemical Society (A) and Copyright © 2017 The Royal Society of Chemistry (B).

The first oxidation of Cα-OH to Cα=O (Ⅱ-1, Fig. 2) can introduce an active Cα site, which can react with some nucleophilic cleavage reagents, such as H2O2, RCOOOH or NH2OH, and the Baeyer-Villiger oxidation [10] or potential Bechman rearrangement can insert an O or N atom between Cα=O and Cβ or C1 of the aromatic rings. Combined with a subsequent hydrolysis process, the Cα-Cβ or Ar-Cα in the original β-O-4 substrate can be cleaved. The acid catalyzed dehydration at -CαHOHCβH-to Cα=Cβ can also enhance the connection between Cα and Cβ, but the Cβ-OAr bond in the Cα=Cβ-OAr structure (Ⅱ-2, Fig. 2) can be easily cleaved via an acidolysis process, during which the H+ species attacks the Cα to generate a CαH-Cβ=O+-Ar and weakens the connection between Cβ and OAr [22-24]. Given that the oxidation of Cα-OH to Cα=O can reduce the BDE of Cβ-OAr and the simultaneous dehydration at -CβHCγH-OH can produce a potential Cγ=Cβ-OAr for further acidolysis as discussed above, the oxidation-dehydration-acidolysis strategy is more promising than direct acidolysis. Stahl et al. [25] reported that the simple HCOOH/HCOONa system could efficiently catalyze the cleavage of Cβ-OAr in oxidized β-O-4 linkages via a redox-neutral process, and the key intermediate (Ⅱ-3, Fig. 2) contains a Cα=O and Cγ=Cβ-OAr structure. Furthermore, the only transformation of CγHOH can promote the cleavage of Cα-Cβ via a potential retro-aldol process with an intermediate containing a -CγHO (Ⅱ-4, Fig. 2) [26].

Although various works have been reported, there are more possibilities to further explore the cleavage strategies for the β-O-4 linkage and other lignin linkages. This perspective briefly highlights the recent progress on this topic. Referring to and summarizing these works, we have revealed the "sell a dummy" strategy for the efficient cleavage of β-O-4 linkage, which focuses on the first modification of adjacent functional group and not the direct cleavage of targeted Cα-Cβ or Cβ-OAr bond. Two concepts, including reducing the target bond BDE and introducing a new substrate site, can provide new guidance for designing the possible reaction route, which can accelerate catalyst screening or mechanism study of lignin and lignin model conversion. Furthermore, the pre-modification of adjacent functional group can also give some guidance in restraining the lignin condensation [16, 27], which can further promote the conversion of native lignin.

References
[1] J. Zakzeski, P. C. A. Bruijnincx, A. L. Jongerius, B. M. Weckhuysen, Chem. Rev., 2010, 110: 3552–3599. DOI:10.1021/cr900354u
[2] C. Z. Li, X. C. Zhao, A. Q. Wang, G. W. Huber, T. Zhang, Chem. Rev., 2015, 115: 11559–11624. DOI:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00155
[3] R. Rinaldi, R. Jastrzebski, M. T. Clough, J. Ralph, M. Kennema, P. C. A. Bruijnincx, B. M. Weckhuysen, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2016, 55: 8164–8215. DOI:10.1002/anie.201510351
[4] Q. Song, F. Wang, J. Y. Cai, Y. H. Wang, J. J. Zhang, W. Q. Yu, J. Xu, Energy Environ. Sci., 2013, 6: 994–1007. DOI:10.1039/c2ee23741e
[5] Q. Song, F. Wang, J. Xu, Chem. Commun., 2012, 48: 7019–7021. DOI:10.1039/c2cc31414b
[6] Q. Song, J. Y. Cai, J. J. Zhang, W. Q. Yu, F. Wang, J. Xu, Chin. J. Catal., 2013, 34: 651–658. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(12)60535-X
[7] J. D. Nguyen, B. S. Matsuura, C. R. Stephenson, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2014, 136: 1218–1221. DOI:10.1021/ja4113462
[8] C. S. Lancefield, O. S. Ojo, F. Tran, N. J. Westwood, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2015, 54: 258–262. DOI:10.1002/anie.201409408
[9] N. C. Luo, M. Wang, H. J. Li, J. Zhang, H. F. Liu, F. Wang, ACS Catal., 2016, 6: 7716–7721. DOI:10.1021/acscatal.6b02212
[10] A. Rahimi, A. Azarpira, H. Kim, J. Ralph, S. S. Stahl, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2013, 135: 6415–6418. DOI:10.1021/ja401793n
[11] J. M. Nichols, L. M. Bishop, R. G. Bergman, J. A. Ellman, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2010, 132: 12554–12555. DOI:10.1021/ja106101f
[12] M. V. Galkin, C. Dahlstrand, J. S. M. Samec, ChemSusChem, 2015, 8: 2187–2192. DOI:10.1002/cssc.v8.13
[13] M. V. Galkin, J. S. M. Samec, ChemSusChem, 2014, 7: 2154–2158. DOI:10.1002/cssc.201402017
[14] X. Y. Zhou, J. Mitra, T. B. Rauchfuss, ChemSusChem, 2014, 7: 1623–1626. DOI:10.1002/cssc.201301253
[15] J. M. Lu, M. Wang, X. C. Zhang, A. Heyden, F. Wang, ACS Catal., 2016, 6: 5589–5598. DOI:10.1021/acscatal.6b00502
[16] C. F. Zhang, H. J. Li, J. M. Lu, X. C. Zhang, K. E. MacArthur, M. Heggen, F. Wang, ACS Catal., 2017, 7: 3419–3429. DOI:10.1021/acscatal.7b00148
[17] C. F. Zhang, J. M. Lu, X. C. Zhang, K. MacArthur, M. Heggen, H. J. Li, F. Wang, Green Chem., 2016, 18: 6545–6555. DOI:10.1039/C6GC01456A
[18] S. Son, F. D. Toste, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2010, 49: 3791–3794. DOI:10.1002/anie.v49:22
[19] M. C. Haibach, N. Lease, A. S. Goldman, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2014, 53: 10160–10163. DOI:10.1002/anie.201402576
[20] M. Wang, J. M. Lu, X. C. Zhang, L. H. Li, H. J. Li, N. C. Luo, F. Wang, ACS Catal., 2016, 6: 6086–6090. DOI:10.1021/acscatal.6b02049
[21] M. Wang, L. H. Li, J. M. Lu, H. J. Li, X. C. Zhang, H. F. Liu, N. C. Luo, F. Wang, Green Chem., 2017, 19: 702–706. DOI:10.1039/C6GC02970A
[22] M. R. Sturgeon, S. Kim, K. Lawrence, R. S. Paton, S. C. Chmely, M. Nimlos, T. D. Foust, G. T. Beckham, ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng., 2014, 2: 472–485. DOI:10.1021/sc400384w
[23] C. W. Lahive, P. J. Deuss, C. S. Lancefield, Z. H. Sun, D. B. Cordes, C. M. Young, F. Tran, A. M. Z. Slawin, J. G. de Vries, P. C. J. Kamer, N. J. Westwood, Barta K., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2016, 138: 8900–8911. DOI:10.1021/jacs.6b04144
[24] P. J. Deuss, M. Scott, F. Tran, N. J. Westwood, J. G. de Vries, K. Barta, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2015, 137: 7456–7467. DOI:10.1021/jacs.5b03693
[25] A. Rahimi, A. Ulbrich, J. J. Coon, S. S. Stahl, Nature, 2014, 515: 249–252. DOI:10.1038/nature13867
[26] S. vom Thorsten, T. den Hartog, J. Buendia, S. Stoychev, J. Mottwei, - ler, C. Bolm, J. Klankermayer, W. Leitner, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2015, 54: 5859–5863. DOI:10.1002/anie.201410620
[27] L. Shuai, M. T. Amiri, Y. M. Questell, - Santiago, F. Hé roguel, Y. Li, H. Kim, R. Meilan, C. Chapple, J. Ralph, J. S. Luterbacher, Science, 2016, 354: 329–333. DOI:10.1126/science.aaf7810