催化学报  2017, Vol. 38 Issue (7): 1184-1195   PDF    
扩展功能
加入收藏夹
复制引文信息
加入引用管理器
Email Alert
RSS
本文作者相关文章
Ting Wang
Wanwen Li
Dandan Xu
Xuanmin Wu
Liwei Cao
Jianxin Meng
Strong visible absorption and excellent photocatalytic performance of brown TiO2 nanoparticles synthesized using one-step low-temperature process
Ting Wang, Wanwen Li, Dandan Xu, Xuanmin Wu, Liwei Cao, Jianxin Meng    
Department of Chemistry, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, Guangdong, China
* Corresponding author. Jianxin Meng, Tel: +86-15521331958; E-mail: tmjx@jnu.edu.cn
Foundation item: This work was supported by Teamwork Project Funded by Guangdong Natural Science Foundation (S2013030012842)
Abstract: We report a facile and modified sol-gel approach to synthesize brown TiO2 nanoparticles at low temperature (100-600℃). The TiO2 nanoparticles dried at 180 ℃ (TiO2-180℃) possessed a small particle size (5.0 nm), large specific surface area (213.45 m2/g), and efficient response to broadband light over the entire ultraviolet-visible spectrum with a narrow band gap of 1.84 eV. In addition, TiO2-180℃ exhibited the optimal reaction rate constant for the degradation of methylene blue (0.08287 mg/(L·min)), which is six times higher than that of the mixed rutile/anatase phase TiO2 photocatalytic standard P25 (0.01342 mg/(L·min)). Furthermore, cycling photodegradation ex-periments confirmed the stability and reusability of this catalyst. The unique physicochemical properties resulting from the low-temperature preparation of TiO2-180℃, including its broadband visible absorption associated with a high concentration of oxygen vacancies, large surface area, and enriched surface -OH/H2O may be responsible for this excellent photocatalytic performance. The use of as-prepared TiO2-180℃ for practical applications is expected after further optimization.
© 2017, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Key words: Titanium dioxide     Visible light     Broadband absorption     Oxygen vacancy     Photocatalytic degradation    
一步低温法制备可见光响应的棕色纳米TiO2及其光催化性能
王婷, 黎婉雯, 许丹丹, 吴轩民, 曹丽伟, 孟建新    
暨南大学化学系, 广东广州 510632
摘要:光催化作为一种具有前景的技术,被广泛运用于有机物降解、废水处理、空气净化、抗菌、太阳能电池等领域.在众多的光催化材料中,纳米TiO2因具有性质稳定、耐腐蚀、廉价和无毒等优点而受到广泛关注.但纳米TiO2禁带宽度较大(3.2 eV)、只对紫外光有响应及电子-空穴对易复合等特性限制了它的应用.因此,提高纳米TiO2的可见光响应一直是研究的热点.本文发展了一种在低温下制备棕色纳米TiO2的改良溶胶-凝胶法.该法以钛酸四丁酯为钛源,无水乙醇为溶剂,形成溶胶后无需陈化和高温高压,在简单温和的条件下即可制备出棕色纳米TiO2.比较了低温干燥和高温焙烧两种处理方法,结果表明,随着制备温度的升高,样品的粒子尺寸增大,比表面积减小,颜色从白色转变为棕色,在更高的温度又变浅.样品的可见光吸收在180℃时达到最大,随后减弱.在优化温度180℃下制备的TiO2-180℃纳米粒子不仅具有较小的粒径(5.0 nm),较大的比表面积(213.45 m2/g),且在整个紫外-可见光区都具有较强的吸收,其禁带宽度低至1.84 eV.X-射线光电子能谱结果表明,TiO2粒子表面的-OH/H2O含量随制备温度升高而先增加后下降.Raman光谱中Eg峰的移动和变宽表明TiO2晶格可能存在缺陷或氧空位,而TiO2-180℃纳米粒子的电子顺磁共振图谱的g值在2.003左右,对应氧空位中的未成对电子,验证了以上推测.其中TiO2-180℃纳米粒子呈现为最强的EPR信号,表明其晶格内存在最高浓度的氧空位,这是其具有强可见光吸收的原因.光催化实验结果表明,在可见光照射下,TiO2-180℃可高效降解亚甲基蓝(MB).当C (MB)=10mg/L,pH=4,催化剂添加量为0.07 g时,TiO2-180℃催化剂的光催化活性达到最佳,光照1 h后MB降解率达到99.33%,反应速率常数(0.08287 mg/(L·min))约为同条件下P25(0.01342 mg/(L·min))的6倍.同时,TiO2-180℃催化剂在不同单色光下的光催化活性与它对单色光的光响应大致相符.循环降解实验证明TiO2-180℃催化剂具有很好的稳定性.光猝灭实验表明,·OH在光催化降解过程占主导作用,而TiO2-180℃样品表面含有较多的-OH,有利于·OH的产生,乃至光催化反应.研究表明,晶格内高浓度的氧空位导致的强可见光响应,得益于低温制备条件而保留了大量-OH/H2O的纳米粒子表面以及更大的比表面积,共同促成了TiO2-180℃优越的光催化活性.所制备的棕色纳米TiO2经过进一步修饰后有望运用于实际应用中.
关键词二氧化钛    可见光    宽谱带吸收    氧空位    光催化降解    

1 Introduction

Photocatalysis is a promising method for the degradation of various organic compounds in wastewater treatment, environmental-pollution reduction, and solar-energy conversion [1-5]. Of the various photocatalysts developed, TiO2 is considered one of the most promising candidates because of its low toxicity, good physical and chemical stability, non-corrosiveness, and low cost [6, 7] and has recently been intensively studied [8-10]. However, the low activity of TiO2 under visible light, which results from its wide bandgap energy of 3.2 eV, and its low quantum efficiency due to the recombination of electron-hole pairs limits its solar-energy-conversion capabilities as well as its practical applications. Because visible light accounts for a large proportion of solar energy, considerable efforts have been devoted to enhancing the visible-light response of TiO2 [11-13].

Enhancement of the photocatalytic activity of TiO2under visible light has been achieved by doping with noble metals [14, 15] or nonmetals [16-19] or via recombination with other semiconductors [20]. The absorption edge of TiO2 in these studies was usually red-shifted to the visible-light range; however, the visible absorption intensity remained insufficient (Table 1). Moreover, these strategies also lead to other problems, such as thermal instability, increased carrier recombination centers [21, 22], decreased photodegradation activity, and the formation of hazardous by-products [23]. The emergence of black TiO2with a narrow band gap has received significant attention [24, 25]. Its strong absorption in the visible-light range and superior photocatalytic performance make it promising in the photocatalysis field. Two major preparation methods are used to synthesize black TiO2, a high-H2-pressure process and hydrogen-gas annealing [26, 27]. The former requires troublesome reaction conditions such as a high-pressure H2 atmosphere for long times, whereas the formation of irregular TiO2 is likely using the latter [28]. Therefore, a more facile route to prepare TiO2 with efficient visible-light absorption and excellent photocatalytic activity is needed.

Table 1
Physical parameters of TiO2 previously studied in the literature.

Based on this understanding, we developed a convenient modified sol-gel synthetic route to prepare TiO2 nanoparticles with strong visible-light response at low temperature. The synthetic TiO2 nanoparticles were characterized using X-ray diffraction (XRD), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM), surface area and porosity analysis, ultraviolet-visible (UV-vis) spectroscopy, Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, Raman spectroscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy. Furthermore, the photocatalytic activity of TiO2 for the degradation of methylene blue (MB) was validated under visible-light irradiation.

2 Experimental
2.1 Materials

Tetrabutyl titanate (Ti(OC4H9)4, 98%) was used as the titanium precursor. Anhydrous ethanol (C2H5OH, 99.7%) was used as the solvent and reactant. Hydrochloric acid (HCl, 36.0%-38.0%) and sodium hydroxide (NaOH, 96%) were used to adjust the pH of the solution. Degussa P25, a mixed rutile/anatase phase TiO2 photocatalytic standard, was used as the control catalyst. All the reagents and solvents were used directly without further purification.

2.2 Synthesis of TiO2 nanoparticles

The typical preparation procedure was as follows. First, 5 mL of Ti(OC4H9)4 was slowly added into 20 mL of C2H5OH under stirring, followed by the addition of 0.75 mL of HCl solution. Then 10 mL of the mixed H2O and C2H5OH solution (1:1, V/V) was added dropwise under continuous stirring to obtain sol A. The TiO2 samples were designated as TiO2-χ℃, where χ indicates the drying or calcination temperature. For 100 ≤ χ ≤ 200, the obtained sol A was dried at χ ℃ for 4 h in an oven to obtain dry crystals. These dry crystals were washed with water and ethanol, dried at 80 ℃ for 4 h, and ground in a mortar to obtain powder samples. For 300 ≤ χ ≤ 600, the obtained sol A was dried at 100 ℃ for 4 h in an oven and then calcined at χ℃ for 2 h in a muffle furnace.

2.3 Structural characterization

Structural characterization of the samples was performed using XRD (Rigaku, D/max-RB) with Cu Kα radiation (λ = 0.15406 nm); conditions of 36 kV and 20 mA and a scan speed of 4°/min were employed. The morphologies of samples were examined using TEM (TECNAI-10, Philips) or HRTEM (H-7650, Hitachi). N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms of the samples were obtained using a surface area and porosity analyzer (Tristar 3000, Micromeritics) with a liquid nitrogen adsorbent at 196 ℃, and the specific surface areas were calculated using the Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) method in the relative pressure range of 0.05-0.3. The surface states of samples were determined using FTIR spectroscopy (Nicolet 6700, Thermo) on KBr disks. EPR data were obtained on an EPR spectrometer (Elexsys E500, Bruker) using an X-band (9.44 GHz, 2.17 mW) microwave with sweeping magnetic field at 110 K in cells. The XPS measurements were performed on an X-ray photoelectron spectrometer (ESCALAB 250, Thermo Fisher Scientific) using an Al Kα monochromatic X-ray source (1486.6 eV, 15 kV, and 150 W). Raman spectra were obtained on a micro-Raman spectrometer (inVia Reflex, Renishaw) using the back-scattering geometry with a diode-pumped solid-state laser (20 mW, 532 nm) as the excitation light source. Diffuse reflectance spectra were obtained using a UV-vis spectrophotometer (Cary 5000, Varian) with BaSO4 as the reference. Absorption spectra were measured using a double-beam UV-vis spectrophotometer (TU-1900, Persee).

2.4 Photoactivity measurements

The photocatalytic performances of the TiO2 samples were evaluated based on the degradation of MB under visible-light irradiation. The TiO2catalysts were dispersed in 50 mL of MB solution (10 mg/L) in a glass beaker under magnetic stirring. The light source consisted of a 300-W xenon lamp equipped with a cut-off filter (400 nm) or three 18-W light-emitting diode (LED) lamps of different colors (blue: 410-480 nm; green: 480-560 nm; red: 600-650 nm). Before visible-light irradiation, the MB solution containing catalysts was kept in the dark for 30 min to establish an adsorption-desorption equilibrium. Concurrently, the light source was preheated for 30 min to achieve a stable light output. In the photocatalysis experiments, 4 mL of the MB solution were removed at certain intervals and centrifuged, and its absorbance at 664 nm was measured. The degradation rate (D%) of the MB solution was determined using the absorbance data and Eq. (1):

(1)

where C0 and A0 are the initial concentration and absorbance of the MB solution, respectively, and Ct and Atare the concentration and absorbance of the MB solution at irradiation time t, respectively. The dynamic process of the photocatalytic degradation of MB over TiO2 can be described using first-order kinetics [29]. Consequently, the reaction rate constant (k) was determined based on Eq. (2) by plotting -ln (Ct/C0) as a function of t:

(2)
3 Results and discussion
3.1 Characterization of photocatalysts
3.1.1 XRD analysis

Fig. 1 presents the XRD patterns for P25 and the TiO2 nanoparticles prepared at various temperatures. The peaks at 25.7°, 38.3°, 48.5°, 54.4°, 55.6°, 63.2°, 70.8°, and 75.6° can be attributed to the (101), (004), (200), (105), (211), (204), (220), and (215) crystal planes of the anatase phase (JCPDS No. 21-1272), respectively [30, 31]. Meanwhile, the peaks at 27.8°, 36.6°, 39.9°, 41.8°, 44.8°, 54.9°, 57.1°, 64.6°, 69.4°, and 70.4° correspond to the (110), (101), (200), (111), (210), (211), (220), (310), (301), and (112) crystal planes of the rutile phase (JCPDS No. 21-1276), respectively [32]. The phase transition temperature (600 ℃) is consistent with that reported in Ref. [33]. The main phase of P25 is anatase, with a small amount of the rutile phase. The intense and sharp diffraction peaks indicate its highly crystalline structure. In contrast, the diffraction peaks for the TiO2-χ℃ (100 ≤ χ ≤ 200) nanoparticles are weak and broad, suggesting that their particles sizes were rather small. According to Serpone et al. [34], the sample must contain at least 5% crystalline material to form a discernible pattern; therefore, we deduced that a mass of amorphous component was present in the TiO2crystal. The crystallinities of the TiO2samples calculated using Jade software ranged between 60% and 80%, confirming this deduction. The peaks become relatively stronger and sharper for the TiO2-χ℃ (300 ≤ χ ≤ 600) nanoparticles, accompanied by a progressive phase transition from the anatase to rutile phase. The narrowing of the diffraction peaks indicates an increase in crystal size and crystallinity, with the crystallinity of the TiO2-600℃ nanoparticles reaching 100%. The crystallite sizes of the TiO2nanoparticles were calculated using the Scherer equation (D = 0.9λ/βcosθ), and the results are presented in Table 2. Based on the XRD results, it was concluded that the preparation temperature plays a key role in the phase composition of TiO2 nanoparticles.

Fig. 1. XRD patterns of TiO2 nanoparticles prepared at various temperatures.
Table 2
Physicochemical properties of synthesized TiO2nanoparticles.
3.1.2 TEM analysis

The morphologies of the TiO2 nanoparticles prepared at various temperatures were examined using TEM and HRTEM. As observed in Fig. 2(a)-(d), TiO2-χ℃ (100 ≤ χ ≤ 200) consisted of aggregated or nonaggregated spherical nanoparticles ( < 10 nm in diameter), whereas only aggregated particles are observed for TiO2-χ℃ (300 ≤ χ ≤ 600) in Fig. 2(e)-(h). These findings indicate that the particle aggregation increased significantly with increasing preparation temperature. The HRTEM image in Fig. 2(i) shows that TiO2-180℃ contained uniform spherical particles with an average diameter of 5.0 nm, which is consistent with the particle size calculated from the XRD data. The lattice fringes of TiO2-180℃ have a spacing of 0.33 nm (Fig. 2(j)), which is attributed to the (101) planes of anatase [32].

Fig. 2. TEM images of TiO2 nanoparticles. (a) TiO2-100℃; (b) TiO2-140℃; (c) TiO2-180℃; (d) TiO2-200℃; (e) TiO2-300℃; (f) TiO2-400℃; (g) TiO2-500℃; (h) TiO2-600℃; HRTEM image (i) and lattice fringes (j) of TiO2-180℃.
3.1.3 Specific surface areas and pore size distributions

The specific surface area is an important indicator of catalyst performance. As observed in Table 2, the TiO2-χ℃ (100 ≤ χ ≤ 200) nanoparticles had larger specific surface areas than P25. The TiO2-140℃ nanoparticles hadthe highest specific surface area (243.76 m2/g), which was almost five times that of P25 (53.07 m2/g). The specific surface areas gradually decreased with increasing preparation temperature. Apparently, a high preparation temperature induced an increase of crystallinity but decrease of the surface area.

The N2 adsorption-desorption isotherm curves and pore size distributions (PSDs) of the TiO2 nanoparticles are presented in Fig. 3. According to the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) classification [14], the isotherm curves of TiO2-100℃ can be classified as Type-Ⅱ isotherms; its adsorption curve overlapped well with the desorption curve for the entire pressure range, which indicates vast quantities of micropores in the TiO2-100℃ nanoparticles. The TiO2-χ℃ (140 ≤ χ ≤ 200) nanoparticles showed Type-Ⅳ isotherms with H2-type hysteresis in the relative pressure range of 0.4-0.6 (Fig. 3(a)), which revealed the presence of mesopores. The isotherm curves of TiO2-χ℃ (300 ≤ χ ≤ 600) can also be classified as Type-Ⅳ with the typical H2-type hysteresis, with the hysteresis loops appearing at relatively higher pressure (Fig. 3(b)), indicating the existence of mesopores and/or macropores. The formation of mesopores and macropores might be the consequence of the reunion of TiO2 nanoparticles at higher temperature.

Fig. 3. N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms (a, b) and pore size distributions (c, d) of TiO2 nanoparticles.

In Fig. 3(c) and 3(d), the TiO2-χ℃ (100 ≤ χ ≤ 200) nanoparticles show monomodal PSDs with the pore size ranging between 1.9 and 7.6 nm, suggesting a small fraction of micropores ( < 2 nm in diameter) and large fraction of mesopores (2-50 nm in diameter). The TiO2-χ℃ (300 ≤ χ ≤ 600) nanoparticles showed a unimodal PSD with a large fraction of pore size diameters in the mesoporous range. The peak location clearly shifted toward larger diameters, indicating that the pore diameter increased with increasing preparation temperature of the TiO2samples.

3.1.4 FTIR analysis

FTIR spectroscopy was used to characterize the surface states of the TiO2samples. As observed in Fig. 4, the TiO2-χ℃ (χ = 100, 140, 180, 400) nanoparticles showed similar FTIR spectra modes. The broad peaks at 3600-2900 cm-1 can be attributed to the O-H stretching and bending vibration of surface-adsorbed water molecules, whereas the absorption peaks at 1608 and 1385 cm-1 are attributed to the bending vibration of H-O-H [35]. The strong and wide absorption in the lower energy region of 800-400 cm-1 can be attributed to the stretching vibration of Ti-O from the TiO2 lattice [36].

Fig. 4. FTIR spectra of TiO2 nanoparticles.
3.1.5 XPS analysis

To further investigate the surface chemical composition and elemental chemical states, XPS measurements of the TiO2-χ℃ (χ = 100, 140, 180, 400) nanoparticles were performed, and the results are presented in Fig. 5. For all the experiments, C 1s (284.8 eV) was used as a standard for the energy scale. The core levels of O 1s, Ti 2p, Cl 2p, and C 1s can be clearly observed in the XPS survey spectra (Fig. 5(a)). In the high-resolution spectra of Ti 2p, the two peaks centered at 458.55-459 and 464.45-464.7 eV are assigned to the binding energies of Ti 2p3/2 and Ti 2p1/2 in the Ti4+ chemical state, respectively [18]. No characteristic binding energy assigned to Ti3+ was observed, which is consistent with the EPR data. The peak areas expanded gradually with increasing preparation temperature, indicating the rise of the relative Ti4+content. The atomic ratio of O:Ti was far greater than 2.0 in TiO2-100℃ (Table 3) and decreased with increasing preparation temperature, implying that the surface of the as-prepared TiO2 nanoparticles was covered by large amounts of -OH/H2O.

Fig. 5. XPS survey spectra of TiO2nanoparticles (a); High-resolution XPS spectra of Ti 2p (b) and O 1s (c).
Table 3
XPS data for TiO2nanoparticles.

The high-resolution O 1s spectra in Fig. 5(c) all contain wide and asymmetric peaks. These spectra were fitted using the software XPS Peak with application of Gaussian fitting to the three peaks at binding energies of 529.8-530.05, 531.2-531.5, and 532.2-532.7 eV, which were attributed to lattice oxygen from TiO2 (O-Ti-O), surface hydroxyl oxygen groups (-OH), and adsorbed H2O, respectively [14]. It is apparent that the relative areas of lattice oxygen increased with increasing preparation temperature, whereas those of the adsorbed water decreased, which is in good agreement with the variation of Ti4+ content shown in Fig. 5(b). Note that the variation of the relative area of hydroxyl oxygen groups shows a substantially different trend. As observed in Fig. 5(c), the relative area of hydroxyl oxygen groups increased with increasing preparation temperature until 180 ℃ and then decreased.

3.1.6 Raman analysis

To examine the structural properties of the TiO2-χ℃ (χ = 100, 140, 180, 400) nanoparticles and the presence of oxygen vacancies (Vo), Raman spectroscopy measurements were performed. P25 was also analyzed as a reference under the same measurement conditions. Four characteristic Raman-active modes of anatase phase centered at 143, 396, 515, and 638 cm-1 are detected in Fig. 6, which is consistent with the reported Raman frequencies [37, 38]. Compared with P25, the Eg peak at 143 cm-1 for the TiO2 nanoparticles obviously displays a certain degree of blue-shift, with Eg shifted from 139 to 144, 150, 152, 154, and 146 cm-1 accompanied by peak broadening. As previously reported, lattice disorder or localized defects related to oxygen vacancies may cause the shifting and broadening of the Eg mode in Raman spectra [39, 40]. In the present case, the information from Raman spectroscopy unambiguously supported the presence of Vo.

Fig. 6. Raman spectra of P25 and TiO2 nanoparticles. Inset: high-resolution Eg mode.

In addition, the blue-shift of the Eg mode of TiO2nanoparticles increased with increasing preparation temperature until 180 ℃ and then decreased, suggesting the change in the Vo concentration. This result supports the conclusion that the Vo concentration can be controlled by the preparation temperature, as evidenced by the EPR and DRS data discussed in the following sections.

3.1.7 EPR spectra

EPR measurements were conducted to further verify the presence of Vo. The black line representing P25 in Fig. 7 shows a negligible EPR signal. Under the same EPR measurement conditions, the TiO2-χ℃ (χ = 100, 140, 180, 400) nanoparticles exhibited varied EPR signal intensities at g = 2.003, corresponding to unpaired electrons trapped by oxygen vacancies [41]. However, the representative signal of Ti3+ usually appearing at g ≈ 1.961 was not observed, confirming the absence of Ti3+ in the as-prepared TiO2 samples, which is consistent with the XPS data [37]. Furthermore, the maximum intensity was observed for the TiO2-180℃ nanoparticles, which indicates that these nanoparticles contained the highest concentration of oxygen vacancies, confirming the Raman spectra analysis.

Fig. 7. EPR spectra of P25 and TiO2 nanoparticles. Inset: EPR spectra of Ti3+.
3.1.8 Absorption properties

The optical properties of the TiO2 nanoparticles were characterized by UV-vis diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS). Fig. 8(a) presents the absorption spectra of P25 and the TiO2 nanoparticles. The absorption edge of P25 was detected at approximately 400 nm because of the intrinsic absorption of anatase TiO2 (3.20 eV) [14]. Compared with P25, the absorption edge of TiO2-100℃ red-shifted to 700 nm and the UV-vis absorption showed a slight enhancement. The visible absorption was remarkably enhanced for TiO2-χ℃ (140 ≤ χ ≤ 180) and gradually declined at higher temperature. The TiO2-180℃ nanoparticles exhibited extensive absorption covering the entire UV-vis spectrum. The absorption spectra of TiO2-χ℃ (χ ≥ 500) were in accordance with those in the literature [14, 18]. A Tauc plot of the KM function vs. energy is plotted in Fig. 8(b), from which the bandgap energies of the samples were deduced; the results are also presented in Table 2. All the TiO2nanoparticles exhibited narrower bandgap energies compared with P25, with TiO2-180℃ having the narrowest band gap of 1.84 eV. Color differences are apparent among the TiO2samples in Fig. 8(c); the depths of the colors agreed well with their absorption intensities in the visible range. More importantly, the color of the TiO2-180℃ nanoparticles remained unchanged for 8 months under ambient condition, suggesting that its stability is satisfactory.

Fig. 8. (a) UV-vis DRS spectra for TiO2nanoparticles; (b) (αhν)2vs. photon energy of TiO2nanoparticles; (c) Images of TiO2nanoparticles.

The intense absorption in the visible range could result from oxygen vacancies [37, 38]. In the study on black TiO2performed by Chen et al. [24], TiO2 samples were hydrogenated at 500 ℃ to introduce oxygen vacancies or surface defects, which can generate two tails at the top of the valence band (VB) and bottom of the conduction band (CB) to narrow the bandgap (Eg) by destroying the lattice periodicity. In our above EPR and Raman analyses, the presence of Vo was detected in the TiO2-180℃ nanoparticles; a high concentration of Vo would lead to disorder of the surface state of the TiO2nanoparticles and generate a new vacancy band below the CB, yielding a decrease of the bandgap energy [26, 37].

In conclusion, the preparation temperature was the critical factor affecting the properties of the TiO2samples. TiO2-180℃ exhibited both a large surface area and strong visible absorption, making it highly promising for photocatalytic degradation under visible-light irradiation.

3.2 Photocatalytic performance
3.2.1 Effect of initial pH

The initial pH of the MB solution has a great effect on the absorption equilibrium between organic molecules and the photocatalyst, thereby affecting the photocatalytic degradation process [42]. Therefore, the effect of the initial pH of the MB solution was investigated. Fig. 9(a) and 9(b) show the photocatalytic activities of the TiO2-180℃ catalyst at different initial pH values. The maximum degradation rate of 99.03% and the maximum reaction rate constant of 0.07036 mg/(L×min) were obtained for an initial pH of 4 under visible-light irradiation for 80 min (Fig. 9(b) and (d)). This degradation rate was far greater than that of a blank experiment, in which 10.74% of MB molecules degraded in the absence of a catalyst after 120 min. A good linear correlation is observed between ln (Ct/C0) and the reaction time (t) in Fig. 7(c), indicating that the degradation process of MB over the TiO2 photocatalyst was consistent with first-order kinetics. The results indicate that faintly acid solution is favorable for the photocatalytic degradation process, which is reasonable because faintly acid solution is favorable for the migration of electrons to the surface of the photocatalyst and their reaction with O2 to form H2O2, generating free ·OH radicals and leading to an increase of the photocatalytic efficiency [43]. Thus, the initial pH was set to 4 in the following experiments.

Fig. 9. (a) Photocatalytic activities of TiO2-180℃ at different initial pH values; (b) Degradation rates; (c) Kinetic linear simulation curves; (d) Reaction rate constants.
3.2.2 Effect of catalyst loading

To investigate the effect of catalyst loading on the photocatalytic degradation process, experiments with TiO2 loadings ranging from 0.04 to 0.10 g were performed; P25 was also analyzed for comparison. The degradation rates of MB increased with TiO2 loading until 0.07 g and then decreased (Fig. 10(a) and (b)). Adequate catalyst loading can provide a sufficient number of active sites, leading to a sufficient concentration of electron-hole pairs, and thus enhanced degradation rate. However, excess catalyst loadings may promote the recombination of electron-hole pairs on the TiO2 surface, reducing the photocatalytic activity of catalysts [44, 45]. At a TiO2 loading of 0.07 g, the degradation rate reached 99.33% under visible-light irradiation for 40 min, far higher than that of P25 (53.87%).Note that the maximum reaction rate constant of TiO2-180℃ (0.08287 mg/(L×min)) was almost six times that of P25 (0.01342 mg/(L×min)), suggesting the enhancement of photocatalytic activity. Fig. 10(e) presents the real-time absorption spectra of MB solution with 0.07 g TiO2 loading during the degradation process.

Fig. 10. Photocatalytic activities (a); Degradation rates (b); Kinetic linear simulation curves (c) and reaction rate constants (d) of TiO2-180℃ at different loadings; (e) Real-time absorption spectra of MB solution during the photodegradation process. Inset: photographs of MB solution in real-time.

We also studied the degradation rates of TiO2-χ℃ (100 ≤ χ ≤ 600) catalysts at the optimal pH and catalyst loadings (Fig. 11). Their photocatalytic activity was roughly consistent with their visible-light responses. However, TiO2-400℃ exhibited an apparently lower degradation rate than TiO2-100℃ despite their similar absorption properties. A plausible explanation is that the TiO2-100℃ nanoparticles exhibited larger specific surface area than TiO2-400℃ nanoparticles. Moreover, the TiO2-140℃ nanoparticles had larger specific surface area than the TiO2-180℃ nanoparticles but resulted in a lower degradation rate because TiO2-180℃ produced a stronger visible-light intensity. These results clearly suggest that the photocatalytic activity of the catalyst was not only affected by its visible-light response, but also related to its particle size and specific surface area. The specific surface area can directly affect the adsorption between the catalyst and target molecules on the surface of the catalyst; a larger specific surface area was conducive to improving surface adsorption, thus improving the photocatalytic reaction rate. The large BET surface area, high response to visible light, and strong adsorption between MB molecules and the catalyst led to the higher photocatalytic activity of TiO2-180℃.

Fig. 11. Degradation rates of MB with different TiO2 nanoparticles under visible-light irradiation.
3.2.3 Photocatalytic performance under LED lamp irradiation

To investigate the dependence of the irradiation light used during the photocatalytic degradation of MB, LED lamps of different colors were used as the light source, and the results are presented in Fig. 12. P25 was also evaluated for comparison. In the blank experiments, the degradation rates of MB were always lower than 13% for all the lamps in the absence of TiO2-180℃ for 240 min. Under the dark stirring condition, approximately 21.63% and 14.62% of MB molecules degraded over the P25 and TiO2-180℃ catalysts, respectively. Conversely, in the presence of the TiO2-180℃ catalyst, the degradation rates increased to 95.10%, 53.36%, and 41.58% for the blue, green, and red LED irradiation, respectively. Under the same conditions, only 42.32%, 26.30%, and 28.54% of MB molecules degraded over P25, respectively. These results indicate that P25 exhibited weak photocatalytic activity under blue-light irradiation and no photocatalytic activity under green-and red-light irradiation, whereas the TiO2-180℃ catalyst exhibited excellent photocatalytic activity under blue-light irradiation and moderate photocatalytic activity under green-and red-light irradiation. The photocatalytic activities under different light irradiation were consistent with the light response of TiO2-180℃ in the DRS spectra in Fig. 8(a).

Fig. 12. Degradation rates of MB with TiO2-180℃and P25 under visible-light irradiation.
3.2.4 Stability of TiO2catalyst

In addition to the photocatalytic activity, the stability of catalyst is another crucial factor for a high-quality catalyst [16]. To examine the stability of the TiO2-180℃ catalyst, three cycles of photodegradation experiments under visible-light irradiation were performed, and the results are presented in Fig. 13. The degradation rate of MB decreased slightly in the cycling degradation experiments. After three successive cycles, the TiO2-180℃ catalyst still resulted in a 92.20% degradation rate. The XRD spectrum of the TiO2-180℃catalyst did not change significantly after the cycling degradation experiments. Although most nanomaterials with small particle size exhibit poor stability, the stability of the present TiO2-180℃ catalyst was satisfactory and is believed to be promising for industrial application after further optimization.

Fig. 13. (a) Degradation rates of three cycles of photodegradation of MB under visible-light irradiation; (b) XRD patterns of TiO2-180℃ before and after photocatalytic reaction.
3.2.5 Quenching experiments

Electron-hole pairs and generated free radicals have been shown to play an important role in the photocatalytic degradation process [46]. Their effects can be deduced from radical quenching experiments. The radical quenching experiments were conducted by adding isopropanol (IPA, an efficient ·OH scavenger), p-benzoquinone (BQ, a superoxide radicals ·O2- quencher), or disodium edetate dihydrate (EDTA-2Na, a scavenger of h+) to the MB solution. The results are presented in Fig. 14. Although IPA, BQ, and EDTA-2Na all suppressed the photocatalytic degradation, the inhibition effect of IPA was most significant, indicating that ·OH, ·O2-, and h+ were all involved in the photocatalytic degradation with ·OH being predominant.

Fig. 14. Effect of quencher on the degradation of MB under visible-light irradiation.
3.2.6 Reaction mechanism

Based on the above results, we proposed a mechanism to explain the enhancement of photocatalytic activity of TiO2-180℃ nanoparticles (Fig. 15). Because of the narrow energy gap of TiO2-180℃ nanoparticles (1.84 eV), its electrons can generally be easily excited from the VB to the CB under visible-light irradiation, producing electron-hole pairs. The electron-hole pairs are then separated and migrate to the surface of TiO2-180℃, reacting with H2O, -OH, and adsorbed O2 on the surface to form ·OH and ·O2-, which are strong oxidizers and tend to react with MB molecules to form CO2 and H2O.

Fig. 15. Mechanism for the photodegradation of MB by TiO2.

The reasons for the enhancement of the photocatalytic activity of TiO2-180℃ nanoparticles can be summarized as follows. First, the high surface area and microporous structure of the TiO2-180℃ nanoparticles contribute to the contact and collision between MB molecules and the catalyst. Next, the high concentration of Vo in the TiO2-180℃ crystal lattice enhance its visible-light absorption, thereby promoting the generation of electron-hole pairs, resulting in high efficiency of the degradation reaction and photocatalytic activity. Finally, quenching experiments confirmed that ·OH was the key factor in the photocatalytic degradation process. Because abundant adsorbed H2O and -OH covered the surface of the TiO2-180℃ molecules, containing more adsorbed H2O and -OH is favorable for the formation of the active species of ·OH and ·O2- in the photocatalytic reaction, thereby improving the photocatalytic activity. These unique physical and chemical properties led to the enhancement of the photocatalytic activity of the TiO2-180℃ nanoparticles for MB degradation.

4 Conclusions

A facile modified sol-gel method was developed for the synthesis of TiO2 nanoparticles at low temperature. The physicochemical properties of the TiO2 nanoparticles prepared at different temperatures were characterized, and their photocatalytic performances were assessed. The TiO2-180℃ nanoparticles had a small particle size of 5.0 nm and large specific surface area of 213.45 m2/g and exhibited efficient absorption over the entire UV-vis range. Moreover, these nanoparticles exhibited excellent photodegradation activity under visible-light irradiation, resulting in the highest degradation rate of 99.33% and highest reaction rate constant of 0.08287 mg/(L×min) at the optimized initial pH of 4 and catalyst loading of 0.07 g. This excellent performance may be attributed to the combined contribution of the small particle size, large surface area, enhanced optical properties associated with the high Vo concentration, and enriched surface -OH/H2O. This work provides an alternative approach for the preparation of TiO2photocatalysts with controllable morphological structure and visible absorption intensity. The as-prepared TiO2 nanoparticles should be promising candidates for applications in solar cells, water splitting, and other light-harvesting systems after further modification.

References
[1] M. Dahl, Y. D. Liu, Y. D. Yin, Chem. Rev., 2014, 114: 9853–9889. DOI:10.1021/cr400634p
[2] J. C. Liu, H. W. Bai, Y. J. Wang, Z. Y. Liu, X. W. Zhang, D. D. Sun, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2010, 20: 4175–4181. DOI:10.1002/adfm.201001391
[3] J. Reszczynska, T. Grzyb, J. W. Sobczak, W. Lisowski, M. Gazda, B. Ohtani, A. Zaleska, Appl. Catal. B, 2014, 163: 40–49.
[4] C. Gannoun, A. Turki, H. Kochkar, R. Delaigle, P. Eloy, A. Ghorbel, E. M. Gaigneaux, Appl. Catal. B, 2011, 147: 58–64.
[5] H. G. Peng, J. W. Ying, J. Y. Zhang, X. H. Zhang, C. Peng, C. Rao, W. M. Liu, N. Zhang, X. Wang. Chin. J. Catal., 2017, 38: 39–47. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(16)62532-9
[6] S. H. Hwang, J. Y. Song, Y. J. Jung, O. Y. Kweon, H. Song, J. Jang, Chem. Commun., 2011, 47: 9164–9166. DOI:10.1039/c1cc12872h
[7] M. Saif, S. M. K. Aboul-Fotouh, S. A. El-Molla, M. M. Ibrahim, L. F. M. Ismail, Spectrochim. Acta. A, 2014, 128: 153–162. DOI:10.1016/j.saa.2014.02.031
[8] J. Reszczynska, T. Grzyb, J. W. Sobczak, W. Lisowski, M. Gazda, B. Ohtani, A. Zaleska, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2014, 307: 333–345. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.03.199
[9] T. L. Thompson, J. T. Yates, Chem. Rev., 2016, 106: 4425–4453.
[10] X. B. Chen, S. S. Mao, Chem. Rev., 2017, 107: 2891–2959.
[11] P. Sangpour, F. Hashemi, A. Z. Moshfegh, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2010, 114: 13955–13961. DOI:10.1021/jp910454r
[12] M. Kapilashrami, Y. F. Zhang, Y. S. Liu, A. Hagfeldt, J. H. Guo, Chem. Rev., 2014, 114: 9662–9707. DOI:10.1021/cr5000893
[13] R. Asahi, T. Morikawa, H. Irie, T. Ohwaki, Chem. Rev., 2014, 114: 9824–9852. DOI:10.1021/cr5000738
[14] D. X. M. Vargas, J. R. DeLa Rosa, C. J. Lucio-Ortiz, A. Hernan-dez-Ramirez, G. A. Flores-Escamilla, C. D. Garcia, Appl. Catal. B, 2015, 179: 249–261. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.05.019
[15] B. Z. Tian, C. Z. Li, J. L. Zhang, Chem. Eng. J., 2015, 191: 402–409.
[16] M. S. Zhu, C.Y. Zhai, L. Q. Qiu, C. Lu, A. S. Paton, Y. K. Du, M. C. Goh, ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng., 2015, 3: 3123–3129. DOI:10.1021/acssuschemeng.5b01137
[17] L. L. Tan, W. J. Ong, S. P. Chai, A. R. Mohamed, Chem. Commun., 2014, 50: 6923–6926. DOI:10.1039/c4cc01304b
[18] L. L. Tan, W. J. Ong, S. P. Chai, A. R. Mohamed, Chem. Eng. J., 2014, 283: 1254–1263.
[19] J. J. Murcia, M. C. Hidalgo, J. A. Nav, J. Arana, J. M. Dona-Rodríguez, Appl. Catal. B, 2015, 179: 305–312. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.05.040
[20] C. F. Lin, C. H. Wu, Z. N. Onn, J. Hazard. Mater., 2008, 154: 1033–1039. DOI:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.11.010
[21] Z. K. Zheng, B. B. Huang, X. Y. Qin, X. Y. Zhang, Y. Dai, M. H. Whang, - bo, J. Mater. Chem., 2011, 21: 9079–9087. DOI:10.1039/c1jm10983a
[22] X. Y. Xin, T. Xu, J. Yin, L. Wang, C. Y. Wang, Appl. Catal. B, 2015, 176-177: 354–362. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.04.016
[23] Z. L. Tang, J. Y. Zhang, Z. Cheng, Z. T. Zhang, Mater. Chem. Phys., 2002, 77: 314–317.
[24] X. B. Chen, L. Liu, P. Y. Yu, S. S. Mao, Science, 2011, 331: 746–750. DOI:10.1126/science.1200448
[25] A. Naldoni, M. Allieta, S. Santangelo, M. Marelli, F. Fabbri, S. Cap-pelli, C. L. Bianchi, R. Psaro, V. D. Santo, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2012, 134: 7600–7603. DOI:10.1021/ja3012676
[26] Z. Wang, C. Y. Yang, T. Q. Lin, H. Yin, P. Chen, D. Y. Wan, F. F. Xu, F. Q. Huang, J. H. Lin, X. M. Xie, M. H. Jiang, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2013, 23: 5444–5450. DOI:10.1002/adfm.v23.43
[27] T. Q. Lin, C. Y. Yang, Z. Wang, H. Yin, X. J. Lu, F. Q. Huang, J. H. Lin, X. M. Xie, M. H. Jiang, Energy Environ. Sci., 2014, 7: 967–972. DOI:10.1039/c3ee42708k
[28] Z. Wang, C. Y. Yang, T. Q. Lin, H. Yin, P. Chen, D. Y. Wan, F. F. Xu, F. Q. Huang, J. H. Lin, X. M. Xie, M. H. Jiang, Energy Environ. Sci., 2013, 6: 3007–3014. DOI:10.1039/c3ee41817k
[29] T. C. An, X. H. Zhu, Y. Xiong, Chemosphere, 2002, 46: 897–903. DOI:10.1016/S0045-6535(01)00157-6
[30] A. A. Ismail, R. A. Geioushy, H. Bouzid, S. A. A-Sayari, A. A-Hajry, D. W. Bahnemann, Appl. Catal. B, 2013, 129: 62–70. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2012.09.024
[31] L. L. Tan, W. J. Ong, S. P. Chai, A. R. Mohamed, Appl. Catal. B, 2013, 166-167: 251–259.
[32] P. F. Wang, Y. H. Ao, C. Wang, J. Hou, J. Qian, J. Hazard. Mater., 2012, 223-224: 79–83. DOI:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.04.050
[33] Y. H. Peng, G. F. Huang, W. Q. Huang, Adv. Powder Technol., 2012, 23: 8–12. DOI:10.1016/j.apt.2010.11.006
[34] N. Serpone, D. Lawless, R. Khairutdinov, J. Phys. Chem., 1995, 99: 16646–16654. DOI:10.1021/j100045a026
[35] T. M. Wandre, P. N. Gaikwad, A. S. Tapase, K. M. Garadkar, S. A. Vanalakar, P. D. Lokhande, R. Sasikala, P. P. Hankare, J. Mater. Sci., 2016, 27: 825–833.
[36] K. Roy, S. K. Mandal, M. N. Alam, S. C. Debnath, J. Sol-Gel. Sci. Tech-nol., 2016, 77: 718–726. DOI:10.1007/s10971-015-3904-0
[37] M. Wajid, . Shah, Y. Q Zhu, X. Y. Fan, J. Zhao, Y. X. Li, S. Asim, C. Y. Wang, Sci. Rep., 2015, 5: 15804. DOI:10.1038/srep15804
[38] L. Pan, J. W. Zhang, X. Jia, Y. H. Ma, X. W. Zhang, L. Wang, J. J. Zou, Chin. J. Catal., 2017, 38: 253–259. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(16)62576-7
[39] H. Yin, T. Q. Lin, C. Y. Yang, Z. Wang, G. L. Zhu, T. Xu, X. M. Xie, F. Q. Huang, M. H. Jiang, Chem. Eur. J., 2017, 19: 13313–13316.
[40] X. Y. Xin, T. Xu, J. Yin, L. Wang, C. Y. Wang, Appl. Catal. B, 2015, 176-177: 354–362. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.04.016
[41] J. Zhao, Y. X. Li, Y. Q Zhu, Y. Wang, C. Y. Wang, Appl. Catal. A, 2015, 510: 34–41.
[42] A. Garc, J. Matos, Open Mater. Sci. J., 2010, 4: 2–4.
[43] C. H. Chiou, C. Y. Wu, R. S. Juang, Chem. Eng. J., 2008, 139: 322–329. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2007.08.002
[44] N. Kashif, F. Ouyang, J. Environ. Sci., 2009, 21: 527–533. DOI:10.1016/S1001-0742(08)62303-7
[45] M. Qamar, M. Muneer, D. Bahnemann, J. Environ. Manage, 2010, 80: 99–106.
[46] B. Chai, J. Li, Q. Xu, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2014, 53: 8744–8752. DOI:10.1021/ie4041065