催化学报  2017, Vol. 38 Issue (7): 1229-1236   PDF    
扩展功能
加入收藏夹
复制引文信息
加入引用管理器
Email Alert
RSS
本文作者相关文章
Junjie Huang
Yanying Song
Dongdong Ma
Yanping Zheng
Mingshu Chen
Huilin Wan
The effect of the support on the surface composition of PtCu alloy nanocatalysts:In situ XPS and HS-LEIS studies
Junjie Huang, Yanying Song, Dongdong Ma, Yanping Zheng, Mingshu Chen, Huilin Wan    
State Key Laboratory of Physical Chemistry of Solid Surfaces, National Engineering Laboratory for Green Chemical Productions of Alcohols-Ethers-Esters, Department of Chemistry, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, Fujian, China
* Corresponding author. Mingshu Chen, Tel/Fax: +86-592-2183723; E-mail: chenms@xmu.edu.cn
Foundation item: This work was supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program, 2013CB933102), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21273178, 21573180, 91545204), and Xiamen-Zhuoyue Biomass Energy Co. Ltd
Abstract: Supported PtCu alloys have been broadly applied in heterogeneous catalysis and electrocatalysis owing to their excellent catalytic performance and high CO tolerance. It is important to analyze the outermost surface composition of the supported alloy nanoparticles to understand the nature of the catalytically active sites. In this paper, homogeneous face-centered cubic PtCu nanoparticles with a narrow particle size distribution were successfully fabricated and dispersed on a high-surface-area TiO2 powder support. The samples were oxidized and reduced in situ and then introduced into the ultrahigh vacuum chamber to measure the topmost surface composition by high-sensitivity low-energy ion scattering spectroscopy, and to determine the oxidation states of the elements by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. The surface composition and morphology, elemental distribu-tion, and oxidation states of the components were found to be significantly affected by the support and treatment conditions. The PtCu is de-alloyed upon oxidation with CuO wetting on the TiO2 sur-face and re-alloyed upon reduction. Phase diagrams of the surface composition and the bulk com-position were plotted and compared for the supported and unsupported materials.
© 2017, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
准原位XPS和HS-LEIS研究载体对PtCu合金纳米催化剂表面组成的影响
黄俊杰, 宋艳英, 马冬冬, 郑燕萍, 陈明树, 万惠霖    
厦门大学化学化工学院, 固体表面物理化学国家重点实验室, 醇醚酯化工清洁生产国家工程实验室, 福建厦门 361005
摘要:Pt是一类高效、稳定的催化剂,但Pt资源短缺且价格昂贵,限制了其广泛商业化应用.合金化可以使Pt的用量大为减少,且往往能显著提高其催化性能,因而广泛应用于多相催化和电催化.其中PtCu合金是一类很有前景的催化剂,Cu资源丰富、价格低廉,不仅降低了成本,而且由于合金效应提高了催化剂的活性和稳定性.由于合金的粒径、形状、组成及结构是影响其催化性能的重要因素,目前研究大多关注这些特征的可控合成. 然而,大多工业金属催化剂都是负载于氧化物上以提高催化性能,合金纳米粒子的形貌以及表面组成因与载体作用而发生改变,也就是所谓的载体效应.这体现在金属/氧化物界面处,能够促进金属粒子分散、改变其形貌甚至化学态、进而改变其催化性能,其中最具代表性的金属-载体强相互作用.因此,研究不同氧化物载体上合金催化剂的分散度、表面组成、化学态,特别是不同气氛的影响,对明确影响催化剂性能的关键控制因素非常重要.但是由于多相催化剂的复杂性,且表面灵敏的测试手段很少,目前相关报道还不多.近年发展起来的高灵敏度低能离子散射谱(HS-LEIS)是表面层灵敏的测试技术,可以测定最表面层的组成和含量. 本文采用溶剂热共还原法成功制备了均一单相、粒径分布较窄的PtCux合金纳米颗粒,并运用浸渍法将其负载在TiO2载体上,以保证载体上纳米粒子组成的均一性.应用准原位X-射线光电子能谱(XPS)和高HS-LEIS对负载的PtCu合金纳米催化剂在不同条件处理后的表面组成和化学状态进行表征,发现催化剂的表面组成、分布、形貌和化学状态显著受到载体和处理条件的影响,同时得到负载和未负载的催化剂表面组成与体相组成关系的相图.结果表明,PtCux/TiO2催化剂在连续氧化过程中,Cu被氧化并较好在载体表面铺展,Pt-Cu合金状态被破坏,Pt可能主要形成单一金属的纳米粒子,并在界面处形成Ptδ+.在连续还原过程中,部分被还原的Cu,与Pt形成富Pt合金粒子.催化剂表面层主要是Cu,Pt很少,与体相组成有很大差别,说明载体对Cu的分散起到重要作用.

1 Introduction

Noble metal alloy catalysts have been used for a number of applications [1-10]. In recent years, Pt-based alloys have been widely used in various fields to reduce the amount of Pt used. Among these alloys, the PtCu alloy is one of the most common alloy catalysts used in heterogeneous catalysis and electrocatalysis [2-10]. Adding Cu can improve the catalytic efficiency of Pt, leading to a reduction in the cost and enhancement in the catalytic performance. Most studies of PtCu alloy nanoparticles focus on tuning the size and morphology for improving their catalytic activities [11-14]. Different types of PtCu alloy nanoparticles including cubes, octahedrons, nanowires, rhombic dodecahedra, nanodendrites, and cubic cages have been successfully synthesized [15-25].

The morphology and surface composition are the most important factors that influence the catalytic performance [26, 27]. However, most industrial catalysts are supported on oxides to improve their efficiency and catalytic performance. Upon supporting nanoparticles onto oxide supports, their morphology, composition, and catalytic performance may change owing to their interaction with the support [28-35]. The so-called support effect often occurs at the metal/oxide interface by encapsulation [31] or high dispersion [32-35]. Among which, strong metal-support interaction (SMSI) is the most famous one [28-30]. Therefore, it is crucial to determine the dispersion, the surface composition as a function of the bulk composition, of an alloy catalyst.

In this paper, homogeneous PtCu alloy nanoparticles were successfully synthesized by a solvothermal method [36]. The obtained nanoparticles were loaded on common oxide supports. In situ X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) [37-41] and high-sensitivity low-energy ion scattering spectroscopy (HS-LEIS) [42-44] were used to characterize the chemical states and compositions after different treatments. Phase diagrams of the surface composition as a function of the bulk composition were obtained and compared with those of unsupported PtCu alloy nanoparticles.

2 Experimental
2.1 Catalyst synthesis

PtCu alloy: 4.0 mg of Pt(acac)2 and 8.0 mg of Cu(acac)2 were dissolved in 3.0 mL of DMF under ultrasonication. Subsequently, 10.0 mL of CTAC (0.01 mol/L in DMF) solution was injected under vigorous stirring. The mixed solution was further stirred for 30 min and then transferred into a 20-mL Teflon-lined stainless-steel autoclave. The sealed vessel was heated from room temperature to 160 ℃, maintained at this temperature for 10 h, and then naturally cooled to room temperature. The products were collected by centrifugation (9000 r/min for 5 min), and then washed several times with ethanol to remove any impurities.

PtCu/TiO2 alloy nanocatalysts: The PtCu alloy nanoparticles were uniformly dispersed in ethanol under ultrasonication and loaded on the TiO2 support (P25) using an impregnation method and then dried at 80 ℃ under vacuum overnight.

2.2 Catalyst characterization

Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and high-resolution TEM (HRTEM) images were conducted on a transmission electron microscope (JEM-2100) operated at 200 kV. High ang le annular dark field scanning transmission electron microscopy (HAADF-STEM) and energy-dispersive X-ray analysis spectroscopy (EDS) were performed using a FEI TECNAI F30 high-resolution transmission electron microscope operating at 300 kV. All samples subjected to TEM measurements were prepared by impregnating the diluted suspension in ethanol under ultrasonication with molybdenum grids (Beijing Xinxing Braim Technology Co. Ltd.). The Pt and Cu contents were analyzed quantitatively by an inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectrometer (ICP-OES, IRIS Intrepid Ⅱ XSP). X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) measurements were recorded on a Rigaku Ultima Ⅳ X-ray diffractometer employing Cu Kα radiation at 35 kV and 15 mA. The surface compositions of the alloy were determined by XPS (Qtac-100 LEIS-XPS) using monochromatic Al Kα (1486.6 eV) radiation. The binding energies were calibrated with respect to the signal for Ti of the titania support (P25, Ti 2p3/2 binding energy of 458.8 eV). The outermost surface compositions were detected by LEIS with Ne+. The related peak area sensitivities were calibrated by pure metal platinum and copper, TiO2(110).

3 Results and discussion

The representative HAADF-STEM images (Fig. 1(a, b)) reveal that PtCu nanoparticles were successfully prepared with a uniform size of ca. 13 nm. Both Pt and Cu were homogeneously distributed in each alloy particle, as indicated by the EDS elemental mapping images in Fig. 1(c, d) and the cross-sectional compositional line profiles in Fig. 1(g). A lattice distance of ca. 0.22 nm was observed in the high-magnification TEM image (Fig. 1(e)), which corresponds to the crystal lattice of the (111) planes of the face-centered-cubic PtCu alloy [36]. XRD pattern of the as-prepared nanoparticles only shows a group of peaks corresponding to PtCu alloy (JCPDS NO. 48-1549). No additional diffraction peaks from either Pt or Cu were detected, as shown in Fig. 1(f). The sharp peaks and perfect match between the diffraction peaks of the PtCu nanoparticles and standard PtCu alloy indicated the high crystallinity of the alloy PtCu phase. The EDS (Fig. 1(h)) and ICP-OES data both showed that each PtCu nanoparticle was composed of Pt and Cu with a close atomic ratio of 1:1 (Table 1). All the above information confirmed the formation of a homogeneous single-phase PtCu alloy nanoparticle.

Fig. 1. TEM (a), HAADF-STEM (b), EDS elemental mapping (c, d) images of PtCu alloy nanoparticles, high-magnification TEM images (e), XRD patterns (f), the cross-sectional compositional line profiles (g), and EDS (h) of the PtCu alloy nanoparticles.
Table 1
Composition of the as-prepared PtCu alloy nanoparticles.

The PtCu/TiO2 sample was calcined at 250 ℃ in air for 2 h to remove the CTAC surfactant. XRD results (Fig. 2) show that the PtCu alloy phase is stable and still exists after calcining at 300 ℃, but shifts to a lower angle after it was calcined at higher temperature and reduced under H2. This suggested the formation of Pt-rich PtCux alloys.

Fig. 2. XRD patterns of PtCu/TiO2 catalysts under air (a) and H2 (b) at different temperatures.

XPS analysis was performed to investigate the chemical state and composition for the PtCu/TiO2 samples. The atomic percentages of the elements were calculated from the normalized peak areas. The binding energy of Ti 2p3/2 at 458.8 eV was used as a reference. The C 1s peak at 284.6 eV is commonly used as a reference. However, for the PtCu/TiO2 with successive redox process, the C 1s peak intensity was very weak and broad. Because TiO2 is the support and is considerably stable during the redox process, Ti 2p3/2 at 458.8 eV for TiO2 was a better reference value. The XPS spectra of Pt 4f for the Pt/TiO2 and PtCu/TiO2 samples are presented in Fig. 3(a). The Pt 4f7/2 for the Pt/TiO2 is ca. 71.0 eV, corresponding to metallic Pt. A negative shift of 0.6 eV was observed for the PtCu/TiO2 [45], consistent with the XRD result for the formation of PtCu alloy. The XPS spectra of Cu 2p3/2 for the Cu/TiO2 are shown in Fig. 3(b). The calcined sample shows a broad peak at 934.4 eV with a shoulder at 932.5 eV, characteristic of Cu2+ and Cu0/Cu+, respectively. The reduced sample shows a peak at 931.8 eV corresponding to Cu0 [46]. For the PtCu/TiO2 sample, the Cu 2p3/2 features are obviously different from those for the Cu/TiO2. The peak for the alloy PtCu at 931.8 eV disappears quickly and the Cu2+ peak gradually increases during the oxidation process in Fig. 3(c). After the sample is reduced again, the Cu 2p3/2 peak moves to 932.1 eV, which is slightly higher than that of 931.8 eV for the as-prepared alloy clusters in Fig. 3(d). This reveals that after the oxidation-reduction cycle, the alloy clusters become Pt rich, which may result from the high dispersion of Cu on the TiO2 surface. The XRD (Fig. 2(b)) and TEM (not shown) analyses also confirm that the PtCu alloy phase cannot be fully recovered, and a Pt-rich PtCux alloy phase forms after the oxidation-reduction cycle.

Fig. 3. Pt 4f (a) and Cu 2p (b) XPS spectra of Cu/TiO2, and Cu 2p XPS spectra of PtCu/TiO2 after the successive treatment with air (c) and H2 (d).

The Cu 3p3/2 peak is at approximately 75 eV, which overlaps with the Pt 4f peak. It is important to deconvolute the Cu 3p3/2 peak from the Pt 4f peak to distinguish the surface Pt species. The Pt 4f can be fitted into three peaks (Fig. 4), 71.0‒71.1 eV for the metallic Pt, 71.8‒71.9 eV for Ptδ+ that bonds with oxygen [47], and 70.4‒70.5 eV for Pt alloyed with Cu. After oxidation at 450 ℃, the peak for the alloying Pt disappears, whereas the peaks for metallic Pt and Ptδ+ gradually increase. Finally, the peak for the metallic Pt becomes dominant. Oxidation of the pre-reduced sample (Fig. 4(b)), metallic and Ptδ+ always coexist. The difference in the Pt species obtained by direct oxidation and oxidation of pre-reduction could result from the different dispersion of Pt. After reduction, Pt species interacted with Cu0to form an alloy phase again, with a small amount of Ptδ+, probably owing to the interaction between Pt atoms and TiO2 or CuOx. The relative intensities of the different Pt species obtained from the peak area in the curve fitting as a function of the treating temperatures are summarized in Fig. 5.

Fig. 4. Pt 4f XPS spectra with peak fitting under direct oxidation (a), oxidation (b) of the pre-reduced PtCu/TiO2, and reduction (c) of the pre-oxidized PtCu/TiO2.
Fig. 5. The amount of the different Pt species from in situ XPS under direct oxidation (a) and oxidation of the pre-reduced (b) PtCu/TiO2.

The relative area ratios from both XPS and LEIS for the PtCu/TiO2 sample during oxidation are shown in Fig. 6. After depositing PtCu nanoparticles onto the TiO2 support and oxidation, both the Cu/Ti and Cu/(Cu+Pt) ratios increase significantly, but there is no significant change in the Pt/Ti ratios. The decrease of the Pt/(Cu+Pt) ratios is clearly evident and is caused by the increase in Cu content. These results indicate that de-alloying occurs with Cu spreading out predominately on the surface, and Pt clustering during the oxidation process [48]. In contrast, upon reduction of the pre-oxidized sample, the XPS Cu/Ti ratio decreased (Fig. 7(a)), whereas the XPS Pt/Ti ratio remained almost constant (Fig. 7(c)). Such tendencies are more apparent in the LEIS (Fig. 7(b, d)). Combined with the core-level binding energies from XPS, it can be concluded that part of Cu re-alloys with Pt during the reduction process. The surface Cu amount is much higher than that of the alloy surface as well as the bulk composition.

Fig. 6. Variation curves of the relative content of elemental Pt/Cu on the surface of PtCu/TiO2 acquired by XPS (a, c) and LEIS (b, d) during the oxidation process.
Fig. 7. Variation curves of the relative content of elemental Pt/Cu on the surface of PtCu/TiO2 acquired by XPS (a, c) and LEIS (b, d) during the reduction process.

The above results show that the support has a significant effect on the dispersion and morphology of the alloy nanoparticles. It is important to understand the surface composition of the supported alloy nanoparticles. A phase diagram of the surface composition versus their bulk composition is the most intuitive to graphically display such alloy effects (Fig. 8). The Pt/total metal ratios obtained by both XPS and LEIS are significantly lower than in the bulk, which indicates that Cu dominates and disperses on the surface. For the unsupported PtCux samples, the surface Pt is also much lower than the bulk Pt under both the oxidation and reduction processes. The Pt ratio of the supported sample is higher when reduced at 400 ℃ but lower when oxidized at 400 ℃ than those for the unsupported samples. This demonstrates that the support plays a key role in determining the surface composition of an alloy sample.

Fig. 8. Phase diagrams of the surface composition versus the bulk composition for (a) supported PtCux alloy catalysts, and (b) unsupported PtCux bimetallic catalysts.

The changes of the chemical state, morphology and composition of the PtCu/TiO2 alloy nanoparticles are illustrated in Scheme 1. According to the core-level binding energy shift of Cu 2p and Pt 4f, the change of Cu0 to Cu2+ and Cu+ to Cu0 and small amount of Cu+ during the oxidation and reduction processes, respectively, are confirmed. From the elemental ratios determined by XPS and LEIS, oxidation results in a significant increase of the surface Cu amount but not Pt, which indicates that de-alloying occurs with Cu forming CuO wetting on the support surface. In contrast, reduction leads to a decrease in the amount of surface Cu, which indicates that de-wetting and re-alloying occurs.

Scheme1. Schematic drawing of the redox process for the surface properties and change rule PtCu/TiO2 alloy nanoparticles.
4 Conclusions

In summary, homogeneous face-centered cubic PtCu alloy nanoparticles were successfully synthesized by the solvothermal method and dispersed onto a TiO2 support. The surface composition and chemical states were investigated by in situ XPS and LEIS. Upon oxidation, de-alloying takes place with Cu being oxidized and well dispersed on the oxide support, whereas Pt being metallic and clustering. Reduction of the pre-oxidized PtCu/TiO2 results in partial re-alloying of the surface Cu with Pt. The surface composition is significantly different from that of the bulk one, with a high Cu content on the surface. The support plays an important role in the dispersion of Cu.

References
[1] M. S. Chen, D. Kumar, C. W. Yi, D. W. Goodman, Science, 2005, 310: 291–293. DOI:10.1126/science.1115800
[2] M. S. Chen, D. W. Goodman, Chin. J. Catal., 2008, 29: 1178–1186. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(09)60021-8
[3] T. Komatsu, A. Tamura, J. Catal., 2008, 258: 306–314. DOI:10.1016/j.jcat.2008.06.030
[4] D. Liang, J. Gao, J. H. Wang, P. Chen, Y. F. Wei, Z. Y. Hou, Catal. Commun., 2011, 12: 1059–1062. DOI:10.1016/j.catcom.2011.03.019
[5] S. H. Zhou, B. Varughese, B. Eichhorn, G. Jackson, K. McIlwrath, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2005, 44: 4539–4543. DOI:10.1002/(ISSN)1521-3773
[6] L. Y. Li, Z. Y. Xu, F. L. Liu, Y. Shao, J. H. Wang, H. Q. Wan, S. R. Zheng, J. Photochem. Photobio. A, 2010, 212: 113–121. DOI:10.1016/j.jphotochem.2010.04.003
[7] J. Knudsen, A. U. Nilekar, R. T. Vang, J. Schnadt, E. L. Kunkes, J. A. Dumesic, M. Mavrikakis, F. Besenbacher, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2007, 129: 6485–6490. DOI:10.1021/ja0700855
[8] F. Papa, A. Miyazaki, M. Scurtu, A. C. Ianculescu, I. Balint, J. Nano-part. Res., 2014, 16: 2249/1–2249/12.
[9] W. J. Kang, R. Li, D. H. Wei, S. L. Xu, S. Y. Wei, H. B. Li, RSC Adv., 2015, 5: 94210–94215. DOI:10.1039/C5RA20464J
[10] H. Xu, Q. Fu, X. H. Bao, Chin. J. Catal., 2013, 34: 2029–2035. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(12)60673-1
[11] H. D. Zhao, C. Z. Yu, H. J. You, S. C. Yang, Y. Guo, B. J. Ding, X. P. Song, J. Mater. Chem., 2012, 22: 4780–4789. DOI:10.1039/c2jm15792f
[12] Y. X. Wang, H. J. Zhou, P. C. Sun, T. H. Chen, J. Power Sources, 2014, 245: 663–670. DOI:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.07.015
[13] Y. J. Li, F. X. Quan, E. B. Zhu, L. Chen, Y. Huang, C. F. Chen, Nano Res., 2015, 8: 3342–3352. DOI:10.1007/s12274-015-0834-7
[14] G. L. Zhang, Z. Z. Yang, W. Zhang, H. W. Hu, C. Z. Wang, C. D. Huang, Y. X. Wang, Nanoscale, 2016, 8: 3075–3084. DOI:10.1039/C5NR08013D
[15] D. Xu, S. Bliznakov, Z. D. Liu, J. Y. Fang, N. Dimitrov, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2010, 49: 1282–1285. DOI:10.1002/anie.200905248
[16] X. Y. Zhao, B. B. Luo, R. Long, C. M. Wang, Y. J. Xiong, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2015, 3: 4134–4138. DOI:10.1039/C4TA06608A
[17] Y. Q. Jiang, Y. Y. Jia, J. W. Zhang, L. Zhang, H. Huang, Z. X. Xie, L. S. Zheng, Chem. Eur. J., 2013, 19: 3119–3124. DOI:10.1002/chem.201203729
[18] Y. Y. Jia, Y. Q. Jiang, J. W. Zhang, L. Zhang, Q. L. Chen, Z. X. Xie, L. S. Zheng, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2014, 136: 3748–3751. DOI:10.1021/ja413209q
[19] J. P. Lai, L. Zhang, W. J. Qi, J. M. Zhao, M. Xu, W. Y. Gao, G. B. Xu, ChemCatChem, 2014, 6: 2253–2257. DOI:10.1002/cctc.201402147
[20] M. L. Xiao, S. T. Li, X. Zhao, J. B. Zhu, M. Yin, C. P. Liu, W. Xing, ChemCatChem, 2014, 6: 2825–2831. DOI:10.1002/cctc.v6.10
[21] W. Hong, J. Wang, E. Wang, Nano Res., 2015, 8: 2308–2316. DOI:10.1007/s12274-015-0741-y
[22] B. Y. Xia, H. B. Wu, X. Wang, X. W. Lou, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2012, 134: 13934–13937. DOI:10.1021/ja3051662
[23] E. Taylor, S. T. Chen, J. Tao, L. J. Wu, Y. M. Zhu, J. Y. Chen, ChemSus-Chem, 2013, 6: 1863–1867. DOI:10.1002/cssc.v6.10
[24] S. F. Fu, C. Z. Zhu, Q. R. Shi, H. B. Xia, D. Du, Y. H. Lin, Nanoscale, 2016, 8: 5076–5081. DOI:10.1039/C5NR07682J
[25] X. H. Sun, K. Z. Jiang, N. Zhang, S. J. Guo, X. Q. Huang, ACS Nano, 2015, 7: 7634–7640.
[26] J. N. Wang, H. X. Dai, H. He, Chin. J. Catal., 2011, 32: 1329–1335. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(10)60242-2
[27] C. M. Wang, S. Bai, Y. J. Xiong, Chin. J. Catal., 2015, 36: 1476–1493. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(15)60911-1
[28] S. J. Tauster, Acc. Chem. Res., 1987, 20: 389–394. DOI:10.1021/ar00143a001
[29] Q. Fu, T. Wagner, Surf. Sci. Rep., 2007, 62: 431–498. DOI:10.1016/j.surfrep.2007.07.001
[30] D. S. Mao, G. Z. Lu, Q. L. Chen, Chin. J. Catal., 2004, 25: 501–510.
[31] S. Schauermann, N. Nilius, S. Shaikhutdinov, H. J. Freund, Acc. Chem. Res., 2013, 46: 1673–1681. DOI:10.1021/ar300225s
[32] Q. Fu, F. Yang, X. H. Bao, Acc. Chem. Res., 2013, 46: 1692–1701. DOI:10.1021/ar300249b
[33] X. N. Chen, J. Y. Chen, Y. Zhao, M. S. Chen, H. L. Wan, Chin. J. Catal., 2012, 33: 1901–1905. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(11)60447-6
[34] L. Dong, X. J. Yao, Y. Chen, Chin. J. Catal., 2013, 34: 851–864. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(12)60592-0
[35] X. J. Yao, F. Gao, L. Dong, Chin. J. Catal., 2013, 34: 1975–1985. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(12)60708-6
[36] Y. Y. Jia, J. Y. Su, Z. B. Chen, K. Tan, Q. L. Chen, Z. M. Cao, Y. Q. Jiang, Z. X. Xie, L. S. Zheng, RSC Adv., 2015, 5: 18153–18158. DOI:10.1039/C4RA15673K
[37] C. D. Wagner, W. M. Riggs, L. E. Davis, J. F. Mouler, G. E. Muilenberg, Handbook of X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy, Perkin-elmer Cor-poration, Physical Electronics Division, Eden Prairie, Minnesota, USA, 1979, 190.
[38] C. C. Chusuei, D. W. Goodman, X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy, In Encyclopedia of Physical Science and Technology, 3rd edition. R. A. Meyers, ed. Academic Press, NY, 2002, 17, 921-938.
[39] E. B. Fox, A. F. Lee, K. Wilson, C. S. Song, Top. Catal., 2008, 49: 89–96. DOI:10.1007/s11244-008-9063-6
[40] S. Cao, J. R. Monnier, C. T. Williams, W. J. Diao, J. R. Regalbuto, J. Catal., 2015, 326: 69–81. DOI:10.1016/j.jcat.2015.03.004
[41] S. Alayoglu, G. A. Somorjai, Top. Catal., 2015, 59: 420–438.
[42] E. Taglauer, W. Heiland, Appl. Phys., 1976, 9: 261–275.
[43] M. Casagrande, S. Lacombe, L. Guillemot, V. A. Esaulov, Surf. Sci. Rep., 2000, 445: L36–L40. DOI:10.1016/S0039-6028(99)01063-8
[44] H. R. J. ter Veen, T. Kim, I. E. Wachs, H. H. Brongersma, Catal. To-day, 2009, 140: 197–201. DOI:10.1016/j.cattod.2008.10.012
[45] Z. Xu, H. M. Zhang, S. S. Liu, B. S. Zhang, H. X. Zhong, D. S. Su, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2012, 37: 17978–17983. DOI:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.09.050
[46] N. Barrabés, A. Frare, K. Föttinger, A. Urakawa, J. Llorca, G. Rup, - prechter, D. Tichit, Appl. Clay Sci., 2012, 69: 1–10. DOI:10.1016/j.clay.2012.07.011
[47] D. R. Butcher, M. E. Grass, Z. H. Zeng, F. Aksoy, H. Bluhm, W. X. Li, B. S. Mun, G. A. Somorjai, Z. Liu, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2011, 133: 20319–20325. DOI:10.1021/ja207261s
[48] R. T. Mu, Q. Fu, H. Y. Liu, D. L. Tan, R. S. Zhai, X. H. Bao, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2009, 255: 7296–7301. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2009.03.086