催化学报  2017, Vol. 38 Issue (12): 2102-2109   PDF    
扩展功能
加入收藏夹
复制引文信息
加入引用管理器
Email Alert
RSS
本文作者相关文章
Daochuan Jiang
Liang Zhu
Muhammad Irfan Rana
Lei Zhang
Pingwu Du
Integrating noble-metal-free NiS cocatalyst with a semiconductor heterojunction composite for efficient photocatalytic H2 production in water under visible light
Daochuan Jiang, Liang Zhu, Muhammad Irfan Rana, Lei Zhang, Pingwu Du     
CAS Key Laboratory of Materials for Energy Conversion, Hefei National Laboratory for Physical Sciences at Microscale, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, iChEM(Collaborative Innovation Center of Chemistry for Energy Materials), University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, Anhui, China
* Corresponding author. Pingwu Du, Tel/Fax:+86-551-63606207;E‐mail:dupingwu@ustc.edu.cn
Foundation item: This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2017YFA0402800), the National Natural Science Foun‐dation of China (51772285, 21473170)
Abstract: Photocatalytic water splitting is an economical and sustainable pathway to use solar energy for large-scale H2 production. We report a highly efficient noble-metal-free photocatalyst formed by integrating amorphous NiS with a CdS nanorods (NRs)/ZnS heterojunction material for photocatalytic H2 production in water under visible light irradiation (λ > 420 nm). The results show that the photocatalytic H2 production rate reaches an optimal value of up to 574 μmol·h-1 after the loading of NiS, which is more than 38 times higher than the catalytic activity of pure CdS NRs. The average apparent quantum yield is~43.2% during 5 h of irradiation by monochromatic 420 nm light. The present study demonstrates the advantage of integration strategies to form not only semiconductor heterojunctions but also photocatalyst-cocatalyst interfaces to enhance the catalytic activity for photocatalytic H2 production.
© 2017, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Key words: Photocatalytic hydrogen evolution     CdS/ZnS     Heterojunction     Nickel sulfide    
硫化镍修饰的硫化镉/硫化锌异质结复合光催化剂用于高效光催化产氢性质的研究
江道传, 祝亮, RanaMuhammad Irfan, 张磊, 杜平武     
中国科学技术大学化学与材料科学学院材料科学与工程系, 中国科学院能量转换材料重点实验室, 能源材料化学协同创新中心, 安徽合肥 230026
摘要:光催化是催化反应中非常重要的一个领域,其中可见光催化反应在实际应用中尤为重要.近几十年,众多研究者致力于可见光催化剂的研究,如有机染料、有机金属复合物和共价有机聚合物等都是常见的可见光催化剂.近年来,人们发现苝酰亚胺(PDI)是一类活性非常高的可见光催化剂,因为一个PDI分子可以连续吸收两个光子而积累足够的能量,使得许多单光子过程能量不足以激发的反应能够顺利进行.然而,由于PDI结构中存在大共轭的苯环,其在大部分溶剂中的溶解度都比较低,尤其是在水相中很难溶解,因此限制了它的应用. 本文将PDI分子通过共价键键合在纳米二氧化硅表面,合成了一种新的多相PDI光催化剂(SN-PDI),解决了PDI在很多溶剂中都难以分散的问题,同时保留了它双光子吸收的光催化特性.我们首先合成了表面修饰有氨基的纳米二氧化硅,然后与苝酐反应,从而将PDI键合在二氧化硅表面.利用二氧化硅的亲水性使得PDI在水中以及大部分溶剂中很好地分散和分离,从而充分发挥PDI的光催化还原性能. 通过29Si固体核磁(NMR)、X射线光电子能谱(XPS)、13C固体核磁、傅里叶变换红外光谱(FT-IR)、紫外-可见吸收光谱以及热重分析等手段表征了合成后的SN-PDI.其中29Si固体核磁谱图中化学位移在-66 ppm处的峰证明了缩合形成的纳米二氧化硅中带有氨基,根据峰面积得到其中33%的硅原子上连有氨基.XPS结果发现,N 1s轨道有明显位移,说明合成后N原子的化学环境发生了明显变化.13C NMR结果表明,合成前后与氨基相连的几个碳也发生了较大位移,与理论一致.FT-IR发现苝酐中酸酐特征峰消失以及亚胺特征峰出现,证明PDI成功键合在了二氧化硅表面. 以十溴联苯醚和4-溴苯乙酮作为卤代底物,分别在有机相和水相中采用SN-PDI光催化降解反应,结果均得到了脱卤后的产物.催化剂循环三次仍有较高活性.可见,键合在纳米二氧化硅表面的PDI确实具有光催化活性.
关键词光催化产氢    硫化镉/硫化锌半导体    异质结    硫化镍    

1 Introduction

Photocatalytic H2 production from water splitting is an attractive approach for solar energy conversion [1, 2]. Since the first report of water splitting by TiO2 electrode 1972 [3], great efforts have been devoted to the development of TiO2-based photocatalysts [4-12]. Unfortunately, TiO2 can only absorb ultraviolet light owing to its wide band gap. Therefore, photocatalysts that are active for H2 evolution under visible light irradiation are highly desirable. Among these visible light-responsive photocatalysts, CdS has proven to be a promising candidate for photocatalytic H2 production, benefiting from its good absorption of visible light and sufficiently negative conductive band potential for proton reduction [13-17]. However, CdS alone usually suffers from rapid recombination of photogenerated charge carriers and photocorrosion, which hampers its activity and practical application [15, 18]. Many approaches have been developed to address this issue, including doping metal elements [19], loading a cocatalyst [20-22], and fabricating heterojunctions with other suitable semiconductors [23-27]. In recent years, the formation of a CdS/ZnS heterojunction has been investigated for visible light-driven photocatalytic H2 production [28-31] and was found to enhance the photocatalytic H2 production. However, the photocatalytic efficiency of these CdS-based systems remains quite low.

Alternatively, noble-metal-based cocatalysts, such as Pt and PdS, have been loaded on a CdS/ZnS nanocrystal photocatalyst to further enhance the performance for photocatalytic H2 production [28]. However, the high cost and scarcity of these cocatalysts limits their practical application on a large scale. Therefore, it is highly desirable to develop active, robust, and low-cost noble-metal-free cocatalysts for H2 production. Among these noble-metal-free cocatalysts, NiS has been demonstrated to be an efficient cocatalyst over CdS [22, 32, 33], C3N4 [34-36], and Cd1-xZnxS [37, 38] for H2 production. However, there have been no reports on the H2 production over a noble metal-free NiS cocatalyst modified by CdS NRs/ZnS heterojunctions.

In this study, we report a highly efficient ternary hybrid photocatalyst obtained by integrating amorphous NiS nanoparticles with a CdS NRs/ZnS heterojunction through a facile chemical deposition loading method for photocatalytic H2 production in an aqueous Na2S/Na2SO3 solution under visible light irradiation. Under optimal conditions, the rate for H2 production is improved more than 38 times when compared with pure CdS and the average apparent quantum yield is 43.2% at 420 nm. A possible mechanism for the enhanced performance is proposed.

2 Experimental
2.1 Materials

CdCl2·2.5H2O (99.0%), thiourea (NH2CSNH2, 99.0%), ethylenediamine (C2H4(NH2)2, 99.0%), NiCl2·6H2O (98.0%), Zn(NO3)2·6H2O (99.0%) Na2S·9H2O (98.0%), and Na2SO3 (97.0%) were purchased from Innochem or Aldrich and used without further purification.

2.2 Synthesis of the photocatalysts

CdS NRs and CdS NRs/ZnS composites were synthesized according to our previous reports with slight modification [21, 29]. To prepare the CdS NRs, 10.125 mmol of CdCl2·2.5H2O and 30.375 mmol of thiourea (CH4N2S) were added into a 100-mL Teflon-lined autoclave filled with 60 mL of ethylenediamine. The autoclave was maintained at 160 ℃ for 48 h and allowed to cool to room temperature. Yellow solid products were collected by centrifugation, and washed with distilled water and ethanol for several times. The final product was then dried at 60 ℃ overnight. In a typical preparation procedure for CdS NRs/ZnS, 101 mg (0.7 mmol) CdS NRs and 20 mg (0.095 mmol) citric acid were added to 50 mL distilled water. The mixture was ultrasonicated for 10 min and then maintained at 40 ℃ for 2 h with stirring. After cooling to room temperature, 20 mL aqueous solution of 20.8 mg (0.07 mmol) of Zn(NO3)2·6H2O was slowly added into the above reaction solution, followed by stirring for another hour. Next, 20 mL aqueous solution containing 0.14 mmol Na2S was slowly added to the solution and the solution was then stirred for 0.5 h. Finally, the product was collected by centrifugation and washed with water and ethanol three times each and dried under vacuum overnight to obtain the product.

Various amounts of NiS were loaded onto the CdS NRs/ZnS samples by in-situ chemical deposition. In a typical procedure, x (x = 0, 10, 100, 400, 1000) μL NiCl2 aqueous solution (20 mmol/L) was added dropwise to a suspension of the CdS NRs/ZnS photocatalyst (2.0 mg) dispersed in 0.25 mol/L Na2S/0.35 mol/L Na2SO3 solution just before the photocatalytic H2 production experiment, and the corresponding samples were labelled as N0, N1, N2, N3, N4, respectively. For comparison, NiS modified CdS NRs was also prepared in a similar procedure except for the addition of CdS NRs instead of CdS NRs/ZnS, and the resulting sample was referred to as CN. The 1 wt% Pt-modified CdS/ZnS (Pt/N0) sample was prepared according to a previous report [42].

2.3 Characterization

The crystal diffraction patterns of the photocatalyst samples were investigated by powder X-ray diffraction (XRD, D/max-TTR Ⅲ) using graphite monochromatized Cu Kα radiation of 1.54178 Å , operating at 40 kV and 200 mA. The scanning rate was 10° min–1 from 10° to 70° (2θ). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was performed on a JSM-6700F microscope. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images were collected on a JEM-2010 electron microscope operated at an acceleration voltage of 200 kV. The UV-vis diffuse reflectance spectra were obtained using a UV-visible spectrophotometer (SOLID 3700 UV-vis spectrometer). X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurements were performed using an ESCALAB 250 X-ray photoelectron spectrometer.

2.4 Photocatalytic H2 production

Photocatalytic H2 production experiments were carried out in a 50 mL round-bottom flask at room temperature. A 300 W Xe-lamp equipped with a 420 nm cut-off filter was used to provide the visible light irradiation. In a typical photocatalytic reaction, 2.0 mg of the photocatalyst powder sample was dispersed in a 20 mL aqueous solution containing 0.25 mol/L Na2S and 0.35 mol/L Na2SO3. Before irradiation, the solution was bubbled with high purity nitrogen for 15 min to remove the air. Methane was used in the reactor as the internal standard. The amount of evolved H2was determined by gas chromatography (GC) equipped with a TCD detector. The apparent quantum yield (AQY) was measured using a 300-W Xe-lamp equipped with a 420 nm (±5 nm) bandpass cut-off filter. The light intensity was approximately 8.9 mW cm–2 and the illuminated area for the reactor was approximately 1.44 cm2. The AQY was calculated based on the following equation:

2.5 Photocurrent measurement

Photocurrent experiments were conducted on a CHI 602E instrument in a standard three-electrode system with the photocatalyst-coated FTO as the working electrode (an active area of 1.0 cm2). A Pt wire was used as the counter electrode and an Ag/AgCl electrode was used as the reference electrode. A 300-W Xe lamp with a cut-off filter (λ > 420 nm) was used as the light source, and the electrolyte was sodium sulfate (Na2SO4, 0.5 mol L–1) solution. The applied potential for the measurement was 0 V versus Ag/AgCl (saturated KCl).

3 Results and discussion

The crystal structures of the as-prepared photocatalyst samples were revealed by powder XRD measurements. Fig. 1 shows the XRD patterns of CdS, N0 (CdS/ZnS), N2 (NiS-CdS/ZnS sample with an optimal amount of NiS) and NiS samples. It was clearly seen that all the diffraction peaks could be well indexed to a hexagonal structure (JCPDS #77-2306) for the CdS sample, which indicated the formation of crystalline hexagonal CdS. The N0 sample showed patterns similar to CdS but had no diffraction peaks from ZnS, owing to the low content and weak crystallization of ZnS in N0, which was consistent with our previous results [29]. NiS was introduced to prepare the N2 sample but the diffraction peaks still showed no significant changes and no obvious crystalline NiS peaks were observed. For comparison, the XRD patterns of pure NiS prepared by the same methodwere also collected and no appreciable diffraction peaks were observed, which indicated the amorphous nature of NiS under the present conditions.

Fig. 1. Powder XRD patterns of CdS, N0, N2, and NiS samples.

SEM measurements were employed to investigate the morphologies of different samples. Fig. 2(a) shows the SEM image of CdS and it could be observed that the CdS sample was composed of NRs with a diameter of 30–60 nm and a length of 0.5–2 mm. When the surface of CdS was modified with ZnS, the resulting N0 sample showed a morphology similar to that of CdS. The element composition for both CdS and N0 samples were measured by EDX (Fig. 1(d) and (e)). The results showed the presence of Cd, S, Cu, Au, and C elements in the CdS sample. For the N0 sample, in addition to the main Cd and S signals from the CdS, an elemental Zn signal was also present, which suggested that ZnS had been loaded on the CdS surface. The pure NiS sample was composed of small nanoparticles of ~100 nm size (Fig. S1). When NiS was loaded onto a CdS NRs/ZnS sample, the corresponding N2 sample also showed a similar morphology (Fig. 2(c)) and new signals for elemental Ni were observed in the EDX analysis (Fig. 2(f)). All the above results indicated that the ternary NiS-CdS NRs/ZnS composite was successfully synthesized.

Fig. 2. SEM images and the corresponding EDX patterns of various photocatalyst samples. (a, d) CdS; (b, e) N0:CdS NRs/ZnS; (c, f) N2: NiS-CdS NRs/ZnS.

To identify the elemental distributions of Cd, S, Zn, and Ni, and to obtain the structural information, TEM-mapping and HRTEM measurements were performed. Fig. 3(a)(d) clearly shows the signals of Cd, S, Zn, and Ni elements in a single nanorod. The width difference between Cd and Zn elements suggested the ZnS was only on the surface of the CdS. In addition, the Ni element, which was loaded by the chemical deposition method, was also distributed on the surface of the CdS NRs. The HRTEM image of the N2 sample exhibited fringes with a lattice spacing of 0.34 nm, which corresponded to the (002) lattice plane of CdS. Another obvious lattice fringe on the surface of CdS with a width of 0.27 nm could be attributed to the (200) plane of ZnS. In addition, the NiS particles on the surface of NRs showed no obvious lattice fringes, which suggested the amorphous nature of NiS on the photocatalyst, and this was consistent with the XRD results.

Fig. 3. EDX mapping of the elemental distribution (a–d) and HR-TEM image (e) of the N2 sample.

XPS was conducted to investigate the element valence states and the surface composition of the N2 sample. As shown in Fig. 4(a), the photocatalyst composite was mainly composed of Cd, S, Zn, O, C, and Ni elements in the survey scan. The O element was proposed to arise from the absorbed gaseous molecules and a C element was used as the reference to correct the binding energies. Fig. 4(b) shows the high resolution spectrum of Cd. The main peaks located at 405.0 and 411.7 eV were attributed to Cd 3d5/2 and Cd 3d3/2, respectively [39]. The high resolution spectrum of S is shown in Fig. 4(c) and the binding energies of S 2p3/2 and S 2p1/2 were 161.4 and 162.5 eV, respectively [40]. The high resolution spectrum of Zn 2p exhibited two peaks at 1045.3 and 1022.2 eV (Fig. 4(d)) [41]. Fig. 4(e) shows the high resolution spectrum of Ni 2p and the observed binding energy of Ni 2p3/2 at 856.4 eV suggested the existence of NiS [37].

Fig. 4. (a) XPS survey spectrum of the N2 sample. High-resolution XPS spectra of Cd 3d (b); S 2p (c); Zn 2p (d); Ni 2p (e).

The UV-vis diffuse reflectance spectra of the CdS, N0, N2, and NiS samples are displayed in Fig. 5. It can be seen that the absorption intensity of CdS started to increase at ∼520 nm indicating a band gap of ~2.4 eV, which was consistent with the value reported in the literature [20, 21]. For the N0 sample, no obvious change could be observed in the visible light owing to the fact that ZnS is transparent at these wavelengths. Based on the absorption spectrum, NiS showed a typical metallic character in our investigations, which could not be directly used for visible light-driven H2 production. By modifying the N0 sample with NiS to obtain the N2 sample, the absorption intensities (500–1200 nm) increased and a darker color was formed. In addition, no significant edge shift was observed for N2, which suggested that NiS was not doped into the semiconductor to change the band gap.

Fig. 5. The UV-vis diffuse reflectance spectra of CdS, N0, N2, and NiS samples.

The activities for H2 production of the as-prepared photocatalyst samples were evaluated under visible light irradiation (λ > 420 nm) using Na2S/Na2SO3 as sacrificial electron donors. As shown in Fig. 6(a), the H2 performance was remarkably promoted by the introduction of NiS. The best of our samples was determined to be N2, which produced the maximum amount of H2 in our experiments at an average rate that reached 574 µmol·h–1, while the average rates were 206, 312, and 12 µmol·h–1 for N1, N3, and N4, respectively. The results indicate that a proper amount of NiS can highly promote the H2production performance in a CdS NRs/ZnS heterojunction. However, if the content of NiS is too high, a negative effect is seen, probably arising from the fact that a large amount of NiS may shield the light absorption and block the active sites on the surface of the CdS NRs/ZnS heterojunction. The Pt-modified CdS/ZnS (Pt/N0) was also prepared and used for comparison (Fig. S2). Only a ~2 times higher H2 evolution rate was observed when 1 wt% Pt was loaded onto CdS/ZnS. However, the performance of Pt/N0 was still much lower than that of the N2 sample, which indicated the beneficial role of NiS in the present system. In the control experiments, pure CdS showed a low photocatalytic activity of ~15 µmol·h–1 (Fig. 6(b)), which could be attributed to the fast recombination of photogenerated electron-hole pairs. The photocatalytic performance of CdS NRs modified by either NiS (CN sample) or ZnS (N0 sample) was indeed improved when compared with that of pure CdS. However, the catalytic activity was far inferior to that of the N2 sample, which strongly suggested the essential synergistic effect of both NiS and ZnS to achieve a highly efficient photocatalytic H2 performance.

Fig. 6. (a) Photocatalytic H2 production rates of NiS-CdS NRs/ZnS samples. (b) Photocatalytic H2 production rates of CdS, NiS-CdS (CN), CdS/ZnS (N0), NiS-CdS/ZnS (N2), and NiS.

We also investigated several other first-row transition metal-based sulfides, such as cobalt sulfide, iron sulfide, copper sulfide, and manganese sulfide, as cocatalyts for integration with the CdS NRs/ZnS heterojunction photocatalyst. All the cocatalysts were loaded by the same in situ chemical deposition method, using amounts equal to the amount of NiS used for sample N2. The results are illustrated in Fig. S3. The H2 production rates were 92, 43, and 98 µmol·h–1 for cobalt sulfide, iron sulfide, and copper sulfide, respectively. It was evident that NiS showed the best activity among all of these transition-metal sulfides.

The apparent quantum yield (AQY) of the NiS-modified CdS NRs/ZnS sample (N2) was measured under a 300 W Xe lamp with a 420 nm (± 5 nm) band-pass filter. As shown in Fig. 7(a), the H2 production rate was stable during the evaluated time and the amount of H2 reached ~177 μmol in total after 5 h with an average AQY value of ~43.2%. This result indicated that NiS-modified CdS NRs/ZnS was an exceptional photocatalyst to improve the electron-hole pair separation and subsequently enhance the photocatalytic H2 production. Good activity is vital but catalytic stability is also a key factor for a photocatalyst. In this present study, three cycles of H2 production were carried out for the photostability testing of the N2 sample. As shown in Fig. 7(b), the sample did not show any significant decrease in H2 production, which indicated the good stability under the present conditions for photocatalytic H2 production. In addition, the SEM image and XRD data of NiS-CdS NRs/ZnS after irradiation for H2 production were also collected, as shown in Fig. S4. The morphology and XRD patterns were similar to the sample before irradiation, further proving the stability of the photocatalyst during the H2 production reaction.

Fig. 7. (a) Time courses of H2 production and apparent quantum yield using N2 photocatalyst in 0.25 mol L–1 Na2S/0.35 M Na2SO3 aqueous solution under 420 nm monochromatic light irradiation. (b) Cyclic runs for the photocatalytic H2 production using N2 photocatalyst in 0.75 mol L–1 Na2S/1.05 M Na2SO3 aqueous solution under visible-light irradiation (λ > 420 nm).

To investigate the possible mechanism for the enhanced photocatalytic H2 production performance, the transient photocurrent response curves of CdS, N0, and N2 on FTO electrodes were recorded using an electrochemical potentiostat under visible light irradiation (λ > 420 nm). As shown in Fig. 8, the results showed that all the photocatalysts exhibited fast photocurrent responses to visible light. When the working electrode was exposed to the dark, the photocurrent densities rapidly decreased to zero, which suggested that the photogenerated electrons were transported to the FTO electrodes to produce photocurrent under irradiation. Notably, the N2 electrode exhibited the best photocurrent performance, better than those of the CdS and N0 electrodes, which indicated that the N2 sample could achieve the most efficient charge transport and separation, and this was consistent with the photocatalytic H2 production activity.

Fig. 8. Transient photocurrent responses of CdS (black), CdS NRs/ZnS (N0, red), and NiS-CdS NRs/ZnS (N2, blue) samples in 0.5 mol L–1 Na2SO4 aqueous solution under visible light irradiation at 0 V vs. Ag/AgCl (saturated KCl).

Building on the above discussion, a proposed mechanism is shown in Scheme 1. Under visible light irradiation, CdS serves as a photosensitizer to absorb photons and generate electron-hole pairs. With the introduction of ZnS, more electrons can be used [28-30] because when NiS is integrated with the CdS NRs/ZnS heterojunction photocatalyst, the NiS can accept electrons from CdS NRs/ZnS and provide active reduction sites where protons are efficiently reduced to H2. Therefore, the recombination process of the electron-hole pairs in NiS-CdS NRs/ZnS is effectively suppressed, leading to a highly improved photocatalytic H2 production activity.

Scheme 1. The proposed reaction mechanism during photocatalytic H2 production.
4 Conclusions

We report a novel ternary hybrid photocatalyst that is composed of an amorphous NiS cocatalyst and CdS/ZnS NRs fabricated by a facile in-situ chemical deposition method. Owing to the synergistic effect between the NiS cocatalyst and CdS/ZnS heterojunction, the photocatalyst composite exhibits an H2 production rate of 574 µmol·h–1 under visible light irradiation (λ > 420 nm) and an average AQY of 43.2% for the N2 sample in 0.25 mol/L Na2S and 0.35 mol/L Na2SO3 aqueous solution at 420 nm. The hydrogen production performance using N2 shows that our new catalyst has among the best catalytic activity for noble-metal-free CdS-based photocatalysts for H2 production in water under visible light. Since the ternary amorphous NiS-CdS NRs/ZnS hybrid photocatalyst is made of earth-abundant elements and can be facilely prepared, it has great potential for large-scale photocatalytic H2 production.

References
[1] M. Murdoch, G. I. N. Waterhouse, M. A. Nadeem, J. B. Metson, M. A. Keane, R. F. Howe, J. Llorca, H. Idriss, Nat. Chem., 2011, 3: 489–492. DOI:10.1038/nchem.1048
[2] N. Z. Bao, L. M. Shen, T. Takata, K. Domen, Chem. Mater., 2007, 20: 110–117.
[3] A. Fujishima, K. Honda, Nature, 1972, 238: 37–38. DOI:10.1038/238037a0
[4] T. Sreethawong, S. Yoshikawa, Catal. Commun., 2005, 6: 661–668. DOI:10.1016/j.catcom.2005.06.004
[5] W. G. Tu, Y. Zhou, Q. Liu, S. C. Yan, S. S. Bao, X. Y. Wang, M. Xiao, Z. G. Zou, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2013, 23: 1743–1749. DOI:10.1002/adfm.v23.14
[6] Q. J. Xiang, J. G. Yu, M. Jaroniec, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2012, 134: 6575–6578. DOI:10.1021/ja302846n
[7] J. Zhang, S. Yan, S. L. Zhao, Q. Xu, C. Li, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2013, 280: 304–311. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.04.153
[8] M. Zhao, H. Xu, H. R. Chen, S. X. Ouyang, N. Umezawa, D. F. Wang, J. H. Ye, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2015, 3: 2331–2337. DOI:10.1039/C4TA06087C
[9] W. Zhou, W. Li, J. Q. Wang, Y. Qu, Y. Yang, Y. Xie, K. F. Zhang, L. Wang, H. G. Fu, D. Y. Zhao, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2014, 136: 9280–9283. DOI:10.1021/ja504802q
[10] M. S. Akple, J. X. Low, Z. Y. Qin, S. Wageh, A. A. Al, - Ghamdi, J. G. Yu, S. W. Liu, Chin. J. Catal., 2015, 36: 2127–2134. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(15)60989-5
[11] A. Y. Meng, B. C. Zhu, B. Zhong, L. Y. Zhang, B. Cheng, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2017, 422: 518–527. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.06.028
[12] J. Q. Wen, X. Li, W. Liu, Y. P. Fang, J. Xie, Y. H. Xu, Chin. J. Catal., 2015, 36: 2049–2070. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(15)60999-8
[13] Q. Li, B. D. Guo, J. G. Yu, J. R. Ran, B. H. Zhang, H. J. Yan, J. R. Gong, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2011, 133: 10878–10884. DOI:10.1021/ja2025454
[14] T. Simon, N. Bouchonville, M. J. Berr, A. Vaneski, A. Adrovi, D. Volbers, R. Wyrwich, M. Dö blinger, A. S. Susha, A. L. Rogach, F. Jaeckel, J. K. Stolarczyk, J. Feldman, Nat. Mater., 2014, 13: 1013–1018. DOI:10.1038/nmat4049
[15] X. Zong, H. J. Yan, G. P. Wu, G. J. Ma, F. Y. Wen, L. Wang, C. Li, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130: 7176–7177. DOI:10.1021/ja8007825
[16] S. Zou, Z. H. Fu, C. Xiang, W. F. Wu, S. P. Tang, Y. C. Liu, D. L. Yin, Chin. J. Catal., 2015, 36: 1077–1085. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(15)60827-0
[17] D. Zhao, Q. Wu, C. F. Yang, R. T. Koodali, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2015, 356: 308–316. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.08.008
[18] M. Q. Yang, C. Han, Y. J. Xu, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2015, 119: 27234–27246. DOI:10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b08016
[19] M. Luo, Y. Liu, J. C. Hu, H. Liu, J. L. Li, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2012, 4: 1813–1821. DOI:10.1021/am3000903
[20] H. Y. Chen, Z. J. Sun, S. Ye, D. P. Lu, P. W. Du, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2015, 3: 15729–15737. DOI:10.1039/C5TA03515E
[21] Z. J. Sun, B. H. Lv, J. S. Li, M. Xiao, X. Y. Wang, P. W. Du, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2016, 4: 1598–1602. DOI:10.1039/C5TA07561K
[22] W. Zhang, Y. B. Wang, Z. Wang, Z. Y. Zhong, R. Xu, Chem. Commun., 2010, 46: 7631–7633. DOI:10.1039/c0cc01562h
[23] V. M. Daskalaki, M. Antoniadou, G. Li Puma, D. I. Kondarides, P. Lianos, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2010, 44: 7200–7205. DOI:10.1021/es9038962
[24] X. W. Wang, L. C. Yin, G. Liu, L. Z. Wang, R. Saito, G. Q. M. Lu, H. M. Cheng, Energy Environ. Sci., 2011, 4: 3976–3979. DOI:10.1039/c0ee00723d
[25] J.Y.Zhang, Y.H.Wang, J.Jin, J.Zhang, Z.Lin, F.Huang, J.G.Yu, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2013, 5: 10317–10324. DOI:10.1021/am403327g
[26] Y. Y. Cui, Chin. J. Catal., 2015, 36: 372–379. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(14)60237-0
[27] Q. Li, X. Li, S. Wageh, A. Al-Ghamdi, J. G. Yu, Adv. Energy Mater., 2015, 5: 1500010. DOI:10.1002/aenm.201500010
[28] L. Huang, X. L. Wang, J. H. Yang, G. Liu, J. F. Han, C. Li, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2013, 117: 11584–11591.
[29] D. C. Jiang, Z. J. Sun, H. H. Jia, D. P. Lu, P. W. Du, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2016, 4: 675–683. DOI:10.1039/C5TA07420G
[30] Y. P. Xie, Z. B. Yu, G. Liu, X. L. Ma, H. M. Cheng, Energy Environ. Sci., 2014, 7: 1895–1901. DOI:10.1039/c3ee43750g
[31] J. Z. Su, T. Zhang, L. Wang, J. W. Shi, Y. B. Chen, Chin. J. Catal., 2017, 38: 489–497. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(17)62769-4
[32] J. L. Meng, Z. M. Yu, Y. Li, Y. D. Li, Catal. Today, 2014, 225: 136–141. DOI:10.1016/j.cattod.2013.08.010
[33] J. Zhang, S. Z. Qiao, L. F. Qi, J. G. Yu, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2013, 15: 12088–12094. DOI:10.1039/c3cp50734c
[34] Z. H. Chen, P. Sun, B. Fan, Z. G. Zhang, X. M. Fang, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2014, 118: 7801–7807. DOI:10.1021/jp5000232
[35] J. D. Hong, Y. S. Wang, Y. B. Wang, W. Zhang, R. Xu, ChemSusChem, 2013, 6: 2263–2268. DOI:10.1002/cssc.201300647
[36] J. Q. Wen, X. Li, H. Q. Li, S. Ma, K. L. He, Y. H. Xu, Y. P. Fang, W. Liu, Q. Z. Gao, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2015, 358: 204–212. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.08.244
[37] C. F. Lin, X. P. Chen, S. Chen, W. F. Shangguan, Acta Phys. Chim. Sin., 2015, 31: 153–158.
[38] J. R. Ran, J. Zhang, J. G. Yu, S. Z. Qiao, ChemSusChem, 2014, 7: 3426–3434. DOI:10.1002/cssc.v7.12
[39] J. L. Yuan, J. Q. Wen, Q. Z. Gao, S. C. Chen, J. M. Li, X. Li, Y. P. Fang, Dalton Trans., 2015, 44: 1680–1689. DOI:10.1039/C4DT03197K
[40] J. G. Yu, J. Jin, B. Cheng, M. Jaroniec, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2014, 2: 3407–3416. DOI:10.1039/c3ta14493c
[41] H. M. Wang, Z. Chen, Q. Cheng, L. X. Yuan, J. Alloys Compd., 2009, 478: 872–875. DOI:10.1016/j.jallcom.2008.12.039
[42] Y. B. Wang, Y. S. Wang, R. Xu, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2013, 117: 783–790.