催化学报  2018, Vol. 39 Issue (2): 250-257   PDF    
扩展功能
加入收藏夹
复制引文信息
加入引用管理器
Email Alert
RSS
本文作者相关文章
Song Song
Dong Wang
Lu Di
Chuanming Wang
Weili Dai
Guangjun Wu
Naijia Guan
Landong Li
Robust cobalt oxide catalysts for controllable hydrogenation of carboxylic acids to alcohols
Song Songa,†, Dong Wangc,†, Lu Dia, Chuanming Wangc, Weili Daia, Guangjun Wua, Naijia Guana,b, Landong Lia,b     
a. School of Materials Science and Engineering & National Institute for Advanced Materials, Nankai University, Tianjin 300350, China;
b. Key Laboratory of Advanced Energy Materials Chemistry of Ministry of Education, Collaborative Innovation Center of Chemical Science and Engineering, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China;
c. SINOPEC, Shanghai Research Institute of Petrochemical Technology, Shanghai 201208, China
* Corresponding author. Landong Li, Tel/Fax: +86-22-23500341; E-mail: lild@nankai.edu.cn
Two authors contributed equally to this work
Foundation item: This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21421001, 21573113) and Sinopec Corp
Abstract: The selective catalytic hydrogenation of carboxylic acids is an important process for alcohol production, while efficient heterogeneous catalyst systems are still being explored. Here, we report the selective hydrogenation of carboxylic acids using earth-abundant cobalt oxides through a reaction-controlled catalysis process. The further reaction of the alcohols is completely hindered by the presence of carboxylic acids in the reaction system. The partial reduction of cobalt oxides by hydrogen at designated temperatures can dramatically enhance the catalytic activity of pristine samples. A wide range of carboxylic acids with a variety of functional groups can be converted to the corresponding alcohols at a yield level applicable to large-scale production. Cobalt monoxide was established as the preferred active phase for the selective hydrogenation of carboxylic acids.
© 2018, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Key words: Selective hydrogenation    Carboxylic acids    Alcohols    Cobalt oxides    Reaction-controlled catalysis    
高效钴氧化物催化羧酸可控加氢制醇
宋松a,†, 王栋c,†, 狄璐a, 王传明c, 戴卫理a, 武光军a, 关乃佳a,b, 李兰冬a,b     
a. 南开大学, 材料科学与工程学院, 国家新材料研究院, 天津 300350;
b. 南开大学, 先进能源材料化学教育部重点实验室, 化学化工协同创新中心, 天津 300071;
c. 中国石油化工集团公司, 上海石油化工研究院, 上海 201208
摘要:羧酸选择加氢是合成醇的重要方法,廉价高效的催化体系仍然在探索中.我们利用地球上储量丰富的钴氧化物作为催化剂,通过控制催化反应过程,进而实现高选择性地催化羧酸加氢制备醇.一系列含有不同官能团的羧酸可以被选择加氢至相应的醇类化合物,反应选择性可以满足工业生产要求.通过一系列的谱学表征以及理论计算,我们证实了钴氧化物在羧酸选择加氢反应中的优选活性位点位为氧化亚钴,从而建立了催化剂与反应活性之间的构效关系,为催化剂的理性设计提供指导. 首先,我们选取硬脂酸加氢反应作为模型反应,通过对地球上储量丰富的氧化镍、四氧化三铁和四氧化三钴的催化活性对比发现,四氧化三钴催化剂活性最高,在473 K,2 MPa氢气条件下,反应速率可以达到1.2 mmol/(h·g).对四氧化三钴催化剂进行不同温度的预还原处理,我们发现催化剂的活性得到显著提高,其中573 K还原的样品活性最高,反应速率可以达到7.3 mmol/(h·g),要远远高于贵金属催化剂Pd/C(0.6 mmol/(h·g))和Pt/C(1.8 mmol/(h·g)). XRD结果表明,随着还原处理温度的不断升高,催化剂由四氧化三钴变为氧化亚钴,最终变为金属态的钴.当还原温度为573 K时,催化剂的组成为单一相氧化亚钴.XPS测试结果表明,当还原温度为573 K时,样品中只含有Co2+的信号峰,并且Co/O的比例为1/1,进一步证明样品是纯态的氧化亚钴.从TEM照片中可以发现,在原始的四氧化三钴样品中观察到晶面间距为0.467和0.244 nm,分别对应四氧化三钴的(111)和(311)晶面.而对于573 K还原的样品只观察到一种晶面间距(0.246 nm),对应氧化亚钴的(111)晶面. 结合表征手段和硬脂酸催化加氢活性结果,我们得出氧化亚钴是573 K还原样品催化羧酸加氢反应的活性位点.理论计算结果进一步证实了这个实验结论.理论计算结果表明,在氧化亚钴(111)晶面,硬脂酸加氢转换为十八醇是非常快速和高效的,然而,对于氢解C-C键和C-O键,需要耗费更高的能量,能垒约为1.2 eV.因为硬脂酸的吸附远远强于十八醇的吸附,硬脂酸的存在会抑制十八醇氢解形成烯烃的反应,只有当硬脂酸酸完全转化为十八醇,才会发生随后的氢解反应.通过控制催化反应过程,可以实现在氧化亚钴(111)晶面高选择性催化酸加氢至醇,也就是反应控制催化过程.基于氧化亚钴在硬脂酸加氢制备十八醇上的优异催化性能,我们进一步研究了一系列含有不同官能团的羧酸化合物的催化加氢,发现氧化亚钴表现出良好的官能团容忍度,可以实现高效、广谱的酸选择加氢至醇反应.
关键词选择加氢    羧酸        氧化钴    反应控制催化    

1 Introduction

Alcohols are known as simple but important building blocks in the fine chemistry industry and have increasing global demand. The catalytic hydrogenation of carboxylic acids with dihydrogen is the most straightforward and green process for the production of alcohols, which is a fundamental transformation in laboratory organic synthesis and is also applied on an industrial scale [1-3]. However, the low electrophilicity of the carbonyl carbon and the weak polarizability of the carbonyl group make the hydrogenation of carboxylic acids very difficult. In the past decades, the hydrogenation of carboxylic acids has been well-investigated with a focus on catalysis [4-13]. Homogeneous organometallic complexes based on ruthenium [4-6], iridium and rhodium [7], and cobalt [8], have been reported, and a delicately designed catalyst system, including metal precursor, ligand, and additive, is the key point to achieve high activity for carboxylic acid hydrogenation. The interaction of the carboxylic acid with the active transition metal center may result in the critical deactivation of the organometallic catalyst.

Heterogeneous catalysts based on platinum group metals, e.g., ruthenium [9-11] and platinum [12], have also been successfully developed for the hydrogenation of carboxylic acids. However, the selectivity toward alcohols is usually ~90%, which is insufficient for alcohol production from carboxylic acid hydrogenation [1, 14, 15]. Moreover, the use of precious metals will undoubtedly increase the cost for the hydrogenation process. Despite current achievements, hydrogenation catalysts are still being explored and the efficient hydrogenation of carboxylic acids to the corresponding alcohols remains challenging.

Herein, we report partially reduced cobalt oxides as robust nonprecious catalysts for the controllable hydrogenation of carboxylic acids to the corresponding alcohols. A wide range of carboxylic acids with different functional groups can be hydrogenated to alcohols under relatively mild conditions at yields applicable to large-scale production.

2 Experimental
2.1 Catalyst preparation

The Co3O4 sample was prepared by a precipitation method. In a typical process, diffluent cobalt salt (cobalt nitrate, cobalt chloride, or cobalt acetate) was dissolved in 200 mL distilled water and a precipitator (1 mol/L of Na2CO3 solution) was added dropwise into the cobalt salt aqueous solution under vigorous stirring until the pH of the mother liquid reached approximately 9. The suspension was aged for 2 h with stirring at room temperature and the precipitate was collected by filtration and thoroughly washed with distilled water. The solid product was dried at 353 K overnight and then calcined in air at 773 K for 6 h to obtain Co3O4.

The as-prepared Co3O4 was further reduced in 5 vol% H2/Ar (flow rate = 20 mL/min) at a designated temperature (473–773 K) for 2 h and the obtained reduced cobalt oxides were labeled as Co3O4-n, in which n indicates the reduction temperature in Kelvin. (Note: The reduced cobalt oxides were extremely active and self-ignition could occur upon contact with air. All experiments with reduced cobalt oxides should be performed in a glove box.)

2.2 Characterization techniques

The specific surface areas of samples were determined by N2 adsorption/desorption isotherms at 77 K collected on a Quantachrome iQ-MP gas adsorption analyzer. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of selected samples were taken on a FEI Tecnai G2 F30 electron microscope at an acceleration voltage of 200 kV. A few drops of the alcohol suspension containing the sample were placed on a carbon-coated copper grid, followed by evaporation at ambient temperature. The temperature-programmed reduction (TPR) experiments of selected samples were performed on a chemisorption analyzer (Chemisorb 2720, Micromeritics) with 5 vol% H2/Ar in the temperature range of 300–1000 K at a heating rate of 10 K/min. Prior to reduction, the sample was pretreated in Ar at 573 K for 1 h. The X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of Co3O4 during the in situ reduction process (473–773 K) were recorded on a Thermo ARL SCINTAG X'TRA diffractometer with Anton Parr XRK 900 reaction chamber using Cu-Kα radiation (λ= 0.1541 nm) at a scanning rate of 4 o/min in the region of 2θ = 10–80o. The sample chamber atmosphere was maintained under flowing 5 vol% H2/Ar at a flowrate of 20 mL/min. X-ray photoelectron spectra (XPS) were recorded on a Thermo Scientific ESCALAB 250Xi spectrometer using a monochromatic Al-Kα X-ray source ( = 1486.6 eV) as the excitation source. The Co3O4 sample was reduced in situ in the reaction chamber, evacuated, and transferred for analysis under vacuum. All spectra were recorded by using an aperture slot of 300×700 micrometers. Accurate binding energies (±0.1 eV) were determined with respect to the position of the adventitious C 1s peak at 284.8 eV.

2.3 Catalytic evaluation and product analysis

The hydrogenation of carboxylic acids or other substrates was performed in a high-pressure stainless-steel autoclave (Xinyuan Chemical Machinery, Series CJK, 300 mL) with a maximum stirring rate of 1500 r/min. In a typical experiment, 0.2 g of catalyst (or without catalyst for the control experiment), 3 mmol of the substrate, and 100 mL alkane solvent (n-hexane, n-heptane, i-octane, or n-dodecane) were well mixed in the autoclave and purged with pure nitrogen at room temperature. The gas supply and discharge were carried out manually through needle valves. The autoclave was rapidly heated to the desired temperature and hydrogen was introduced at 2 MPa to initiate the reaction. The reaction pressure was kept at 2 MPa with a small negative deviation (~0.2 MPa) owing to the consumption of hydrogen. Samples of the liquid phase were continuously taken through a sampling tube with a filter at certain intervals. The stirring rate was kept at 750 r/min during the reaction.

The liquid organic products were analyzed by gas chromatography (Shimadzu GC-2010) and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (Shimadzu GCMS-QP2010 SE), both with a RXI-5MS column (30 m, 0.25 mm internal diameter, stationary phase thickness 0.25 μm). n-Eicosane was used as an internal standard for quantification through the internal standard method. For the hydrogenation of dioic acids, the substrates and liquid organic products were analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography (Shimadzu LC-20AT) with a Carbomix H-NP column (7.8 × 300 mm, stationary phase thickness 10 μm). The gas products were analyzed with a mass spectrometer (Pfeiffer Omnistar GSD 320).

For recycling tests, the catalyst sample was separated from the liquid phase by configuration in the glove box (without a washing step) and then mixed with the desired amount of stearic acid for the next reaction cycle.

2.4 Computational methods and modeling

All the spin-polarized calculations were performed with the Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof (PBE) functional using the VASP software [16, 17]. The project-augmented wave (PAW) method was used to represent the core-valence electron interaction. The valence electronic states were expanded in the plane wave basis sets with energy cutoff at 450 eV, and the occupancy of the one-electron states was calculated using Gaussian smearing. The ionic degrees of freedom were relaxed using the BFGS minimization scheme until the Hellman-Feynman forces on each ion were less than 0.3 eV/nm. Transition states were searched using a dimer method [18, 19], and were verified when (ⅰ) all forces on the atoms vanished; and (ⅱ) the total energy was a maximum along the reaction coordination but a minimum with respect to the rest of the degrees of freedom. The dipole correction was applied throughout the calculations to take the polarization effect into account.

The CoO (111) surface was modeled as a four-Co-layer p(4×4) periodic slab consisting of 128 atoms, and a corresponding 1×1×1 k-points mesh was used during calculations. Atoms in the bottom two layers were fixed, and all other atoms were fully relaxed. For the calculations for CoO, the on-site coulomb correction was used to describe the electronic and geometric structure, i.e., the so-called DFT+U method [20, 21]. The effective U value was set to 7 eV for Co 3d orbitals, as suggested in previous works [21]. In addition, we tested the effect of the spin state of 3d electrons in Co2+ in the optimization of CoO, and found that the high-spin antiferromagnetic arrangement was the most stable state, which was consistent with literature reports [22, 23].

For the model construction, two types of CoO (111) surface were initially considered, as shown in Fig. S1. Model Ⅰ was exposed and had a fully reduced upper surface (Co-terminated) and a fully oxidized bottom surface (O-terminated), whereas Model Ⅱ was terminated with two identical partially oxidized (or reduced) surfaces. Thermodynamic calculations showed that the surface energy of Model Ⅱ was 1.23 J/m2 more stable than that of Model Ⅰ. Thus, Model Ⅱ was used as the theoretical model for the CoO (111) surface to explore the reaction mechanism throughout the calculations. The detailed intermediate structures (including transition states) for the optical pathway are shown in Fig.s S2 & S3.

3 Results and discussion

Biomass-derived stearic acid (C17H35COOH) was initially chosen as a model substrate and the hydrogenation of stearic acid was investigated by using various transitional metal oxides as catalysts. As shown in Table 1, the selective hydrogenation of stearic acid to 1-octadecanol was achieved by using simple transition metal oxides such as Fe3O4, Co3O4, and NiO as catalysts. Co3O4 appeared to be a more active hydrogenation catalyst with a reaction rate of 1.2 mmol/h/g at 473 K and under 2 MPa hydrogen, comparable with platinum group metal catalysts Pd/C (0.6 mmol/(h·g)) and Pt/C (1.8 mmol/(h·g)). Furthermore, perfect selectivity of > 99.9% toward the alcohol was observed over Co3O4, which was superior to Pd/C (89.6%) and Pt/C (97.9%). The precursors for the preparation of Co3O4 can influence the catalytic performance of cobalt oxides to some extent (Fig. S4). The Co3O4 was further treated in hydrogen at different temperatures to derive partially reduced cobalt oxides for the hydrogenation of stearic acid. The activity of pristine Co3O4 was significantly enhanced through partial reduction and the perfect selectivity toward 1-octadecanol was well preserved. Typically, a high reaction rate of 7.3 mmol/(h·g) with > 99.9% 1-octadecanol selectivity was obtained on Co3O4 reduced at 573 K, i.e., Co3O4-573. Because the reaction occurs on the surface of the oxides, the surface specific activity was calculated and the intrinsic activity of Co3O4-573 (0.447 mmol/(h·m2)) was more than 30 times higher than that of Co3O4 (0.014 mmol/(h·m2)). Undoubtedly, partially reduced cobalt oxides were robust catalysts for the selective hydrogenation of stearic acid to 1-octadecanol and the reduction treatment in hydrogen was the key step for achieving the high activity. According to the time-dependent behavior of stearic acid hydrogenation (Fig. S5), the complete conversion of stearic acid to 1-octadecanol can be achieved before the further conversion of 1-octadecanol to alkanes. Hot filtration experiments (Fig. S6) revealed the heterogeneous nature of the stearic acid hydrogenation catalytic reaction by Co3O4-573, which also exhibited good recycling ability (Fig. S7).

Table 1
Catalysts and their performance in the hydrogenation of stearic acid to 1-octadecanol a.

The effects of the reaction temperature on the stearic acid hydrogenation were investigated. As expected, increasing the reaction temperature significantly promoted the conversion of stearic acid over Co3O4-573. Kinetic plots of the stearic acid conversion (Fig. S8) indicated a linear increase in stearic acid conversion with reaction time at the early stage of the reaction and perfect selectivity toward 1-octadecanol was obtained before the total conversion of stearic acid, independent of the reaction temperatures. After the total conversion of stearic acid, the product 1-octadecanol was further converted to n-octadecane and n-heptadecane (Fig. S6) through a hydrogenolysis route [24-27]. Therefore, the selective hydrogenation of stearic acid to 1-octadecanol over Co3O4-573 was realized through a reaction control process. The apparent activation energies, calculated by using the Arrhenius equation (Fig. S7), were 70 and 85 kJ/mol for the stearic acid hydrogenation to 1-octadecanol and subsequent 1-octadecanol hydrogenolysis over Co3O4-573, respectively.

To establish the structure-activity relationship in the selective hydrogenation of stearic acid, a series of spectroscopic characterization techniques were performed on the cobalt oxide catalysts. In situ XRD patterns (Fig. 1(a)) revealed that the bulk phase changed from Co3O4 (JCPDS 43-1003) to CoO (JCPDS 43-1004) and then to metallic cobalt (JCPDS 05-0727) during the reduction of Co3O4 at increasing temperatures. The temperature-programmed reduction by hydrogen (H2-TPR) profile of Co3O4 (Fig. 1(b)) revealed a two-stage reduction of the cobalt species, i.e., the reduction of Co3+ to Co2+ at 500–700 K (H/Co≈2/3) and the reduction of Co2+ to Co0 at 600–800 K (H/Co≈2/1) [28, 29]. For Co3O4-573, the dominant reduction of Co2+ to Co0 at 600‒900 K (H/Co≈2/1) was observed in the H2-TPR profile [30]. The results from the XRD and H2-TPR analysis suggested that the pristine hexagonal Co3O4 was transformed into cubic CoO upon hydrogen reduction at 573 K. The surface states of the cobalt oxides were further investigated by XPS analysis. As shown in Fig. 1(c), binding energy values at 794.7 and 779.7 eV corresponding to Co 2p1/2 and 2p3/2 of Co3+ and/or Co2+ were observed for Co3O4. The satellite features at ~805 and ~786 eV indicated the presence of Co2+[31], and a mixture of Co2+ and Co3+ with a Co2+/Co3+ ratio of ~1/3 (owing to surface enrichment of Co3+ in Co3O4) was obtained according to the nonlinear least-squares fitting results. Through the reduction in hydrogen at 573 K, exclusive Co2+ is observed for Co3O4-573. The ratio of Co/O was measured to be 1/1, which confirmed the homogeneous distribution of cobalt and oxygen species in stoichiometric CoO. The morphology and lattice structure of the cobalt oxides were investigated by electron microscopy. The pristine Co3O4 samples appeared to be nanoparticles or nanorods with a size of several tens of nanometers. Hydrogen reduction at 573 K could induce the growth of nanoparticles or nanorods to some extent (Fig. S11), accompanied by the decrease in surface area (Table 1). In the high-resolution transmission electron microscope (TEM) image of Co3O4 (Fig. 1(d)), adjacent lattice distances of 0.467 and 0.244 nm were observed, corresponding to the (111) and (311) planes, respectively [32-34]. For Co3O4-573, the typical adjacent lattice distance was measured to be 0.246 nm, corresponding to the (111) plane in cubic CoO [34].

Fig. 1. Characterization of cobalt-based catalysts employed in this study. (a) In situ XRD patterns of Co3O4 during hydrogen reduction; (b) H2-TPR profiles of Co3O4 and Co3O4-573; (c) XPS of Co3O4 and Co3O4-573; High-resolution TEM images of Co3O4 (d) and Co3O4-573 (e). Scale bar = 5 nm.

On the basis of the above-mentioned characterization and catalytic results, the pristine Co3O4 could be partially reduced to pure-phase nanostructured CoO under controlled conditions and the as-obtained Co3O4-573 was established as a robust catalyst for the selective hydrogenation of stearic acid to 1-octadecanol. Heterogeneous cobalt catalysts have been reported to be very active in several important reactions, e.g., carbon monoxide oxidation [32], oxygen evolution reaction [35], electroreduction of carbon monoxide [36], alcohol oxidation and nitroarenes hydrogenation [37, 38]. The structure sensitivity of reactions on cobalt-based catalysts is widely acknowledged and has triggered significant debates [32, 33, 35-40]. In this study, CoO was definitely identified as the active species for the hydrogenation reaction. Hereafter, CoO (111) is used as a model surface for stearic acid hydrogenation and the reaction pathway was investigated through first-principles periodic density functional theory (DFT) calculations.

To convert carboxylic acids into alcohols, a few hydrogenation (+H) and C–O dissociation (dis) steps that proceed in the right sequence are required. The optimal pathways for the selective conversion of stearic acid into 1-octadecanol (blue), n-octadecane (green), and n-heptadecane (yellow) on the CoO (111) surface are shown in Fig. 2. As the stearic acid adsorbs on the surface, the direct dissociation of both the C=O and the C–OH bonds are not favored thermodynamically. Alternatively, the hydrogenation step proceeds first with a H atom preferentially bonding at the α-C site instead of the carbonyl oxygen, overcoming a barrier of 0.96 eV. Then, the removal of the OH group is ready to occur with a small barrier (0.36 eV) and large energy release (–0.62 eV), generating the surface-adsorbed stearic aldehyde intermediate. By further saturating the C=O bond with two H atoms, whereby the α-C site again has the priority over the carbonyl oxygen, the 1-octadecanol is generated. The conversion of 1-octadecanol into alkanes proceeds through one and/or two elementary steps that are in common with the 1-octadecanol generation pathway, and then splits into two branches yielding the n-octadecane and n-heptadecane. For the production of n-octadecane, the C–O bond cleavage starts as the 1-octadecanol adsorbs on the surface by direct detachment of the OH group. For the generation of n-heptadecane, the C–C bond breaks between the α-C and β-C of the deprotonated 1-octadecanol species, forming the heptadecyl group and formaldehyde on the surface. Afterwards, the as-formed octadecyl and heptadecyl species can be hydrogenated into alkanes by overcoming a reaction barrier of 0.81 eV. We also investigated other possible pathways for the production of alkanes, which were all proven to be thermodynamically prohibited on the CoO (111) surface (dashed squares in Fig. 2).

Fig. 2. Proposed reaction mechanism for stearic acid hydrogenation on the CoO (111) surface using DFT calculations. The blue arrows indicate the reaction route for 1-octadecanol generation, whereas the green and yellow arrows are for n-octadecane and n-heptadecane production, respectively. Other disfavored pathways are indicated by dashed arrows. The reaction energetics, including the reaction barriers for the favored pathways, are also listed.

Kinetically, as driven by the favorable energetics, it was expected that the conversion of stearic acid into 1-octadecanol would be quick and efficient, although the computed effective barrier was slightly higher than the experimental value (0.96 vs 0.73 eV). In contrast, in the hydrogenolysis process, the bond breaking of both the C–O and C–C bonds costs a lot energy (endothermic 0.67 and 0.53 eV, respectively) with high barriers of ~1.2 eV. Therefore, the branching reaction of alkanes production would be temporarily blocked (~0% selectivity) as long as the main route of 1-octadecanol production proceeded. The subsequent hydrogenolysis of 1-octadecanol started to emerge only when the stearic acid was exhausted in the system (~100% conversion), which was consistent with the experimental observations shown in Fig. S5. Therefore, our DFT results demonstrate that CoO (111) is a good catalyst for the hydrogenation of stearic acid, and the selective hydrogenation to alcohols can be realized by controlling the concentration of acid substrates.

Inspired by the successful catalysis of the partially reduced cobalt oxides in the model reaction, we further investigated the selective hydrogenation of a wide range of carboxylic acids with different structures and functional groups (Table 2 & Fig. S12). As expected, Co3O4-573 exhibited high activity in most cases and appeared to be an efficient catalyst for the controllable hydrogenation of various carboxylic acid substrates. For the hydrogenation of biomass-derived saturated fatty acids, saturated fatty alcohols were obtained with yields of > 97.5 % (Entry 1–7). We also performed stearic acid hydrogenation on a larger scale (10 mmol stearic acid) and the isolated yield was determined to be 95.8% (Fig. S10), in accordance with the GC yield (97.9%). In the case of oleic acid, the hydrogenation of the carbon-carbon double bond occurred before the hydrogenation of the carbon-oxygen bond and 1-octadecanol was obtained as the final product with a yield of > 99.9% (Entry 8, Fig. S12). The hydrogenation of cycloalkyl carboxylic acids, i.e., cyclopentane-and cyclohexane-carboxylic acid, proceeded in slightly lower yields than the straight-chain fatty acids and cycloalkyl alcohols, which were produced in quantitative yields (Entry 9 & 10). If the carbon atom in the cycloalkyl ring was substituted with an oxygen atom, the derivatives, e.g., tetrahydro-furan-3-carboxylic acid and tetrahydropyran-4-carboxylic acid, also smoothly underwent hydrogenation and the desired alcohols were produced with the epoxy structure well preserved (Entry 11 & 12). The hydrogenation of carboxylic acid in the presence of a hydroxyl group, e.g., 4-hydroxyhexanecarboxylic acid, occurred to produce the corresponding 4-(hydroxymethyl) cyclohexanol in quantitative yield (Entry 13). A very interesting example was the hydrogenation of monomethyl adipate, i.e., a carboxylic acid in the presence of an ester group, to methyl 6-hydroxyhexanoate (Entry 14). The carboxyl group was hydrogenated to a carbinol group and the ester group was well preserved, by which the hydrogenation of the ester group is easier then the carboxyl group [8]. DFT calculations revealed that the carboxyl group adsorbs more easily on CoO (111) (adsorption energy: –1.11 eV) than the ester group (adsorption energy: –0.84 eV). That is, 4-monomethyl adipate adsorbs on the CoO (111) surface through the carboxyl group. Moreover, owing to the influence from thermodynamic entropy at a reaction temperature of 473 K (~0.9 eV), the adsorption of the ester group on CoO (111) was difficult, which hindered its hydrogenation. The selective hydrogenation of aromatic acids, i.e., phenylpropionic acid and phenylbutyric acid, can proceed at a low temperature of 433 K, leading to the formation of phenylpropanol and phenylbutanol in good yields (Entry 15 & 16). The cinnamic acid underwent a preferential hydrogenation of the carbon-carbon double bond, followed by hydrogenation to phenylpropanol (Entry 17), similar to the case of oleic acid. The hydrogenation of phenylacetic acid did not lead to the formation of phenethyl alcohol as the xpected product. Instead, the aromatic hydrogenation products cyclohexylethanol (86.1%) and ethyl cyclohexane (13.9%) were formed (Entry 18). Clearly, the synergy effects can effectively activate the benzene ring and lead to the products from hydrogenation of the benzene ring. With an oxygen insertion between the carboxyl and the benzene ring, the selective hydrogenation of 2-methoxyphenylaceticacid was successfully performed with both the benzene ring and methoxy groups well preserved (Entry 19). Moreover, the hydrogenation of dioic acids, i.e., adipic acid and suberic acid, was achieved through a step-by-step process and the diols were obtained as the final products in good yields (Entry 20–22). An esterification-hydrogenolysis process with ring formation-opening was observed during the conversion of adipic acid (Fig. S12). The hydrogenation of succinic acid proceeded through a dehydration-decarbonylation route, resulting in γ-butyrolactone instead of 1, 4-butanediol as the final product in a quantitative yield of > 99.9%, (Entry 23; Fig. S12). The further hydrogenolysis of γ-butyrolactone to 1, 4-butanediol did not occur under the employed reaction conditions because the five-membered ring γ-butyrolactone was very stable against ring-opening. The Co3O4-573 catalyst was finally employed for the hydrogenation of carboxylic acids with halide, nitrile, or keto groups. The Co3O4-573 was not tolerant to these groups, and nonselective hydrogenations occurred (not shown here).

Table 2
Controllable catalytic hydrogenation of biomass-derived and other carboxylic acids to corresponding alcohols a.
4 Conclusions

Cobalt oxides were developed as cheap and abundant heterogeneous catalysts for the controllable hydrogenation of carboxylic acids. Partial reduction by hydrogen dramatically promoted the activity of pristine cobalt oxides. A wide range of carboxylic acids with certain functional groups were selectively hydrogenated to the corresponding alcohols using molecular hydrogen as the reductant at yields applicable to large-scale production. Spectroscopic analysis and theoretical calculation results revealed that cobalt monoxide was the preferred catalyst for the selective hydrogenation of carboxylic acids, which underwent a reaction-controlled process.

Supporting Information

More characterization and catalytic results of cobalt oxides in the selective hydrogenation of carboxylic acids.

References
[1] S. Nishimura, Handbook of heterogeneous Catalytic Hydrogenation for Organic Synthesis[M]. New York: Wiley, 2001
[2] P. A. Dub, T. Ikariya, ACS Catal., 2012, 2: 1718–1741. DOI:10.1021/cs300341g
[3] J. Pritchard, G. A. Filonenko, R. van Putten, E. J. M. Hensen, E. A. Pidko, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2015, 44: 3808–3833. DOI:10.1039/C5CS00038F
[4] F. M. A. Geilen, B. Engendahl, M. Hölscher, J. Klankermayer, W. Leitner, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2011, 133: 14349–14358. DOI:10.1021/ja2034377
[5] T. Stein, M. Meuresch, D. Limper, M. Schmitz, M. Hölscher, J. Coetzee, D. J. Cole-Hamilton, J. Klankermayer, W. Leitner, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2014, 136: 13217–13225. DOI:10.1021/ja506023f
[6] X. J. Cui, Y. H. Li, C. Topf, K. Junge, M. Beller, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2015, 54: 10596–10599. DOI:10.1002/anie.201503562
[7] T. P. Brewster, A. J. M. Miller, D. M. Heinekey, K. I. Goldberg, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2013, 135: 16022–16025. DOI:10.1021/ja408149n
[8] T. J. Korstanje, J. I. van der Vlugt, C. J. Elsevier, B. de Bruin, Science, 2015, 350: 298–302. DOI:10.1126/science.aaa8938
[9] J. E. Carnahan, T. A. Ford, W. F. Gresham, W. E. Grisby, G. F. Hager, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1955, 77: 3766–3768. DOI:10.1021/ja01619a025
[10] L. Corbel, - Demailly, B. K. Ly, D. P. Minh, B. Tapin, C. Especel, F. Epron, A. Cabiac, E. Guillon, M. Besson, C. Pinel, ChemSusChem, 2013, 6: 2388–2395. DOI:10.1002/cssc.201300608
[11] J. M. Lee, P. P. Upare, J. S. Chang, Y. K. Hwang, J. Ho Lee, D. W. Hwang, D. Y. Hong, S. H. Lee, M. G. Jeong, Y. D. Kim, Y. U. Kwon, ChemSusChem, 2014, 7: 2998–3001. DOI:10.1002/cssc.v7.11
[12] H. G. Manyar, C. Paun, R. Pilus, D. W. Rooney, J. M. Thompson, C. Hardacre, Chem. Commun., 2010, 46: 6279–6281. DOI:10.1039/c0cc01365j
[13] B. Rozmys, ł owicz, A. Kirilin, A. Aho, H. Manyar, C. Hardacre, J. Wärn, T. Salmi, D. Y. Murzin, J. Catal., 2015, 328: 197–207. DOI:10.1016/j.jcat.2015.01.003
[14] T. Turek, D. L. Trimm, N. W. Cant, Catal. Rev. Sci. Eng., 1994, 36: 645–683. DOI:10.1080/01614949408013931
[15] B. Chen, U. Dingerdissen, J. G. E. Krauter, H. G. J. L. Rotgerink, K. Möbus, D. J. Ostgard, P. Panster, T. H. Riermeier, S. Seebald, T. Tacke, H. Trauthwein, Appl. Catal. A, 2005, 280: 17–46. DOI:10.1016/j.apcata.2004.08.025
[16] G. Kresse, J. Furthmüller, Comp. Mater. Sci., 1996, 6: 15–50. DOI:10.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0
[17] G. Kresse, J. Hafner, Phys. Rev. B, 1994, 49: 14251–14269. DOI:10.1103/PhysRevB.49.14251
[18] G. Henkelman, H. Jónsson, J. Chem. Phys., 1999, 111: 7010–7022. DOI:10.1063/1.480097
[19] C. M. Wang, Y. D. Wang, Y. J. Du, G. Yang, Z. K. Xie, Catal. Sci. Tech-nol., 2015, 5: 4354–4364. DOI:10.1039/C5CY00483G
[20] B. J. Morgan, G. W. Watson, Surf. Sci., 2007, 601: 5034–5041. DOI:10.1016/j.susc.2007.08.025
[21] D. Wang, J. Jiang, H. F. Wang, P. Hu, ACS Catal., 2016, 6: 733–741. DOI:10.1021/acscatal.5b01714
[22] I. V. Solovyev, A. I. Liechtenstein, K. Terakura, Phys. Rev. Lett., 1998, 80: 5758–5761. DOI:10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.5758
[23] C. Rödl, F. Fuchs, J. Furthmüller, F. Bechstedt, Phys. Rev. B, 2009, 79: 235114. DOI:10.1103/PhysRevB.79.235114
[24] B. Wojcik, H. Adkins, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1933, 55: 1293–1294.
[25] B. X. Peng, X. G. Yuan, C. Zhao, J. A. Lercher, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2012, 134: 9400–9405. DOI:10.1021/ja302436q
[26] E. I. Gürbüz, D. D. Hibbitts, E. Iglesia, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2015, 137: 11984–11995. DOI:10.1021/jacs.5b05361
[27] L. Di, S. Yao, M. Li, G. Wu, W. Dai, G. Wang, L. Li, N. Guan, ACS Catal., 2015, 5: 7199–7207. DOI:10.1021/acscatal.5b02180
[28] R. Bechara, D. Balloy, J. Y. Dauphin, J. Grimblot, Chem. Mater., 1999, 11: 1703–1711. DOI:10.1021/cm981015n
[29] Y. Q. Ji, Z. Zhao, A. J. Duan, G. Y. Jiang, J. Liu, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2009, 113: 7186–7199. DOI:10.1021/jp8107057
[30] The very small hydrogen consumption at 523-673 K should be due to the reduction of trace Co3+ formed during sample pre-treatment in argon containing trace oxygen in H2-TPR experiment. The different temperature ranges of Co2+ reduction to Co0 in Co3O4 and Co3O4-573 are originated from their different textural properties.
[31] B. V. Crist, Handbook of Monochromatic XPS Spectra[M]. New York: Wiley, 2011
[32] X. W. Xie, Y. Li, Z. Q. Liu, M. Haruta, W. J. Shen, Nature, 2009, 458: 746–749. DOI:10.1038/nature07877
[33] C. Z. Yuan, L. Yang, L. R. Hou, L. F. Shen, X. G. Zhang, X. W. Lou, Energy Environ. Sci., 2012, 5: 7883–7887. DOI:10.1039/c2ee21745g
[34] M. R. Ward, E. D. Boyes, P. L. Gai, ChemCatChem, 2013, 5: 2655–2661. DOI:10.1002/cctc.v5.9
[35] M. Zhang, M. de Respinis, H. Frei, Nat. Chem., 2014, 6: 362–367. DOI:10.1038/nchem.1874
[36] S. Gao, Y. Lin, X. C. Jiao, Y. F. Sun, Q. Q. Luo, W. H. Zhang, D. Q. Li, J. L. Yang, Y. Xie, Nature, 2016, 529: 68–71. DOI:10.1038/nature16455
[37] R. V. Jagadeesh, T. Stemmler, A. E. Surkus, M. Bauer, M. M. Pohl, J. Radnik, K. Junge, H. Junge, A. Brückner, M. Beller, M. Bauer, Nat. Protocol., 2015, 10: 916–926. DOI:10.1038/nprot.2015.049
[38] T. Schwob, R. Kempe, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2016, 55: 15175–15179. DOI:10.1002/anie.201608321
[39] C. P. Plaisance, R. A. van Santen, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2015, 137: 14660–14672. DOI:10.1021/jacs.5b07779
[40] L. C. Liu, P. Concepci, A. Corma, J. Catal., 2016, 340: 1–9. DOI:10.1016/j.jcat.2016.04.006