催化学报  2018, Vol. 39 Issue (2): 258-274   PDF    
扩展功能
加入收藏夹
复制引文信息
加入引用管理器
Email Alert
RSS
本文作者相关文章
Svetlana A. Yashnik
Vadim V. Kuznetsov
Zinfer R. Ismagilov
Effect of χ-alumina addition on H2S oxidation properties of pure and modified γ-alumina
Svetlana A. Yashnika, Vadim V. Kuznetsova, Zinfer R. Ismagilova,b     
a. Boreskov Institute of Catalysis SB RAS, Lavrentieva, 5, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia;
b. Institute of Coal Chemistry and Materials Science FRC CCC, SB RAS, Sovetskii, 18, Kemerovo 650000, Russia
* Corresponding author. Svetlana A. Yashnik, Tel: 8(383)3306681; Fax: 8(383)3306219; E-mail: yashnik@catalysis.ru
Abstract: The influence of the textural and acidic properties of γ-Al2O3, (γ+χ)-Al2O3, and α-Al2O3 on the catalytic activity, selectivity, and stability of direct H2S oxidation has been studied. A comparison of the H2S-to-S conversion effectiveness of aluminas with their acidic properties (identified by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and temperature programmed desorption of NH3) shows that H2S adsorption occurs predominantly on weak Lewis acid sites (LAS). γ-Alumina samples containing a χ-phase and/or modified Mg2+ ions have a greater concentration of weak LAS and exhibit greater catalytic activity. When alumina is treated with a sulfuric acid solution, strong LAS appear and the number of LAS decreases significantly. Modification of alumina with hydrochloric acid has a limited effect on LAS strength. Weak LAS are retained and double in number compared to that present in the unmodified alumina, but the treated sample has Al-Cl bonds. Alumina samples modified by sulfate and chloride anions exhibit poor catalytic activity in H2S oxidation.
© 2018, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Key words: Alumina    χ-Al2O3    Hydrogen sulfide oxidation    Acidic property    Lewis acid sites    Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy    NH3-temperature programmed desorption    
χ-氧化铝的添加对纯的和修饰的γ-氧化铝上H2S氧化反应性能的影响
Yashnik Svetlana A.a, Kuznetsov Vadim V.a, Ismagilov Zinfer R.a,b     
a. 俄罗斯科学院西伯利亚分院博列斯科夫催化研究所, 新西伯利亚 630090, 俄罗斯;
b. 俄罗斯科学院西伯利亚分院煤化学与材料科学研究所, 联邦煤炭和煤炭化学研究中心, 克麦罗沃 650000, 俄罗斯
摘要:考察了γ-Al2O3,(γ+χ)-Al2O3和α-Al2O3的结构性质和酸性对其催化H2S直接氧化反应性能(活性、选择性和稳定性)的影响.采用红外光谱(FTIR)与氨-程序升温脱附(NH3-TPD)方法对氧化铝作用下H2S转化为S的反应性能与其酸性进行了比较.结果显示,H2S吸附主要发生在弱Lewis酸位.含有χ相和/或Mg2+修饰的γ-Al2O3样品具有更高浓度的弱Lewis酸位,并表现出更高的催化活性.当氧化铝样品用硫酸溶液处理后,表现出强Lewis酸位性质,且Lewis酸位点数量显著下降.而当用HCl对氧化铝进行修饰时,其对Lewis酸位强度的影响很小,保持着弱Lewis酸位的性质,且其Lewis酸位数量与未修饰的样品相比增加了二倍,但处理过的样品中含有Al-Cl键.用硫酸盐和氯离子修饰过的氧化铝样品在H2S氧化反应中的催化性能均较低.
关键词氧化铝    χ-Al2O3    硫化氢氧化    酸性质    路易斯酸位    红外光谱    氨-程序升温脱附    

1 Introduction

Low-temperature alumina is widely employed in industrial catalysis as a catalytically active material and as a support for catalytically active components. Its utility is based on the high specific surface area and surface acidity of different crystal modifications of alumina including γ-, η-, and χ-Al2O3. γ-Al2O3 has been used most extensively. Pure, activated, and chlorinated γ-aluminas have been applied to the hydroisomerization of C4-C6 hydrocarbons[1-3], alkylation of isobutane by alkenes [4, 5], cracking of long-chain alkanes[6], and dehydrochlorination of chloroalkanes [7]. The activity and stability of alumina in these reactions is presumed to depend on surface acidity [2]. In our opinion, χ-Al2O3 deserves greater consideration owing to the greater number of defects in its structure [8] and, consequently, more sites for stabilization of catalytically active components [9].

In this paper, we focus on the use of alumina as a catalyst and as a support for the direct oxidation of hydrogen sulfide. Direct catalytic H2S oxidation to elemental sulfur selectively removes hydrogen sulfide from natural gas without appreciable conversion of the hydrocarbons [10, 11]. The reaction takes place at a comparatively low temperature of 220-280 ℃ [11]. Although activated carbon [12-14] and zeolites [15] are commonly employed as catalysts for H2S oxidation, individual oxides of transition metals (e.g., Fe2O3, CuO, MnOx, CrOx, and V2O5) or their mixtures are more promising [16-32]. Granulated and monolithic aluminas, which are widely used as a support material for this process [17, 18, 22, 25, 33], possess a natural activity for direct H2S oxidation. However, their activity and selectivity are insufficient, because alumina accelerates both the forward and reverse directions of the Claus reaction [34, 35].

This work examines the oxidative interaction of hydrogen sulfide with different crystal modifications (γ, χ, and α) of alumina and with cation-and anion-modified aluminas. Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy of adsorbed CO as a probe molecule and temperature-programmed desorption of ammonia (NH3-TPD) were used to characterize the surface acid properties of aluminas and to explain their catalytic activity in direct H2S oxidation. The textural properties of aluminas also were used to identify structure-performance relationships.

2 Experimental
2.1 Preparation of Al2O3

Five spherical alumina samples, γ-Al2O3, (γ+15%χ)-Al2O3, (γ+35%χ)-Al2O3, (γ+50%χ)-Al2O3, and α-Al2O3 were prepared by hydrocarbon-ammonia molding [22, 36, 37]. Samples were treated with an acid peptizer [37] to impart plasticity to the aluminum hydroxide pastes. The acid mole fraction was 0.067 as in [36]. The γ-Al2O3 sample was prepared from aluminum hydroxide with a pseudoboehmite structure as in ref. [33]. γ-Al2O3 samples containing 15 and 35 wt% χ-Al2O3 were prepared from aluminum hydroxide produced by the thermal decomposition of gibbsite in a catalytic heat generator [36, 37]. The sample containing 50 wt% γ-Al2O3 and χ-Al2O3 was produced from a mixture of gibbsite and pseudoboehmite. The χ-Al2O3 sample containing trace γ-Al2O3 was prepared from gibbsite. The above samples were calcined at 550 ℃ for 4 h in air. The spherical α-Al2O3 sample was prepared by thermal calcination of γ-Al2O3 at 1200 ℃ for 6 h.

MgO/(g+15%c)-Al2O3 was produced by modifying spherical granules of aluminum hydroxide with magnesium nitrate solution, drying at 110 ℃, and heating at 550 ℃ as described elsewhere [33]. The MgO concentration in the calcined samples was 3.2 wt%. Sulfate-modified alumina samples were prepared by incipient wetness impregnation of spherical granules of (γ+15%χ)-Al2O3 with a sulfuric acid solution, drying at 110 ℃, and calcining at 500 ℃ for 4 h. The sulfate content determined by X-ray fluorescence analysis varied from 1 to 10 wt% SO42–. The chlorinated alumina sample was prepared by impregnating spherical granules of (γ+15%χ)-Al2O3 with a hydrochloric acid solution (0.5 mol/L), drying at 110 ℃, and calcining at 500 ℃ for 4 h. The nominal chlorine concentration was 1 wt% Cl, but the actual Cl content determined by X-ray fluorescence (XRF) analysis was 0.35 wt%.

2.2 Characterization of Al2O3

The chemical composition of initial and spent aluminas was examined by XRF spectroscopy using an ARL analyzer with a Rh anode. The physicochemical properties of the samples are given in Table 1. The textural properties of the catalysts including specific surface area (SBET), pore volume (VΣ), and pore diameter (d) were determined by nitrogen adsorption isotherms at –196 ℃ using an ASAP2400 automated adsorption analyzer (Micromeritics, United States).

Table 1
Physicochemical properties of alumina samples.

The phase composition of alumina was determined from X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns recorded for 2θ = 10°-70° at a scan rate of 1°/min using the crystallographic databases X-ray Powder Diffraction Files JCPDS-ICDD and ICSD-for-WWW (database Fachinformationszentrum (FIZ), Karlsruhe, Germany, 2003-2010). The XRD patterns were obtained on an HZG-4C diffractometer (Freiberger Prazision Mechanik, Germany) using monochromatic Cu Kα radiation. The extent of χ-and γ-modification of the alumina samples was established from XRD data employing calibrating mixtures.

The compositions of spent and sulfated alumina samples were determined by differential thermal and thermogravimetric analysis (DTA-TG) on a NETZSCH STA 449 (Тetzsch-Geratebau GmbH, Germany) instrument. A 100-mg powdered sample was placed in a crucible and heated from 20 to 1000 ℃ at a rate of 10 ℃/min in air (50 cm3/min).

2.3 FTIR experiments

A "BOMEM MB102" FTIR spectrometer was used for spectroscopic studies. Carbon monoxide adsorption was studied in a homemade low-temperature IR reactor/cell equipped with a heating chamber and a chamber with CaF2 windows. The design allowed us to expose the sample to heat pretreatment under vacuum and then record a spectrum from –196 to 20 ℃. Hydrogen sulfide adsorption was examined in a homemade high-temperature spectroscopic reactor/cell, whose design allowed for preheating of the sample under vacuum, adsorption of H2S, and recording of a spectrum at 20-400 ℃.

Triturated samples were pressed into 10-20 mg/cm2 thick self-supported wafers. A catalyst wafer was placed in the low-or high-temperature spectroscopic reactor/cell and pretreated under vacuum (< 10–3 mbar) at 400 ℃ for 4 h. CO or H2S was then adsorbed on the catalyst.

Pure carbon monoxide was introduced to the spectroscopic reactor/cell at 2.5 mbar. An FTIR spectrum was recorded at room temperature at 1200–4000 cm–1 with 4 cm–1 resolution and 100 accumulated scans. The sample was cooled to –196 ℃ with liquid nitrogen to provide maximal CO adsorption on the sample, and a spectrum was recorded. A series of spectra were recorded as the temperature rose from –196 ℃ to ambient during nitrogen evaporation. This procedure allowed identification of different catalytic sites on the sample surface due to the continuous decrease in CO coverage during a single run. The spectra were normalized by wafer density.

The concentration and strength of Lewis acid sites (LAS) and Br nsted acid sites (BAS) were determined using methods described elsewhere [38, 39]. The integrated intensities of absorption bands in the CO vibration regions of 2180–2240 cm–1 (LAS) and 2150–2175 cm–1 (BAS) were calculated from alumina spectra and were divided by the molar extinction coefficients. The latter quantity (cm/μmol) was assumed to equal 1.23 for the band at 2240-2220 cm–1, 1.1 at 2215–2205 cm–1, 1.0 at 2200 cm–1, 0.9 at 2190–2196 and 2177–2180 cm–1 [38, 39, 40], and 2.6 at 2150–2175 cm–1 [40, 41]. The BAS content of aluminas was determined using the 3650-3800 cm–1 OH vibration region and a molar extinction coefficient of 5.3 cm/μmol [42]. The uncertainty of the quantitative measurements was 20%.

Hydrogen sulfide was added to the spectroscopic reactor/cell, which contained the heat-pretreated sample wafer at a pressure of 40 mbar. Hydrogen sulfide adsorption on alumina was studied at 20 ℃, and H2S transformation was examined at 100, 200, and 300 ℃ by FTIR spectroscopy. FTIR spectra were recorded at 1000–4000 cm–1 with 4 cm–1 resolution and 100 accumulated scans.

2.4 NH3-TPD experiments

The surface acidity of aluminas also was studied by NH3-TPD. NH3-TPD experiments were carried out in a flow apparatus equipped with a thermal conductivity detector. A 100-mg sample with a fractional composition of 0.25–0.50 was mixed with 100 mg of quartz of similar granule size. The sample was pretreated in an argon stream (30 cm3/min) at 500 ℃ for 2 h to remove adsorbed water. It was cooled to 75 ℃, and ammonia was adsorbed by flowing a mixture of NH3 (0.35 vol%) in He over the sample for 1 h. The sample was flushed with helium (30 cm3/min) to remove ammonia from the catalyst pores and cooled to room temperature. The NH3-TPD curve was recorded by passing helium through the sample at a rate of 30 cm3/min and heating from 25 to 700 ℃ at a rate of 10 ℃/min. The total surface acidity was estimated from the amount of desorbed ammonia (μmol/g) assuming single-site ammonia adsorption.

2.5 Activity tests in the reaction of hydrogen sulfide oxidation

The catalytic activity and stability of the samples was measured in a fixed-bed catalytic reactor at a stoichiometric ratio of reagents (H2S/O2 = 2/1) in He. The reactor was positioned vertically so that the sulfur generated in the experiment flowed down to be collected in a glass container. The H2S concentration in the initial feed was 0.6 vol%. A 1-cm3 alumina sample with a 0.25–0.5 mm granule size was placed in the quartz reactor. The space velocity of the feed was 100 cm3/min, and the gas hour space velocity (GHSV) was 6000 h–1. The catalytic activity of aluminas was studied at 200-400 ℃, and the stability of their catalytic behavior was examined at 300 ℃ over 50 h.

Reagents (H2S, O2) and reaction products (SO2, COS) were analyzed using a "Tsvet-500M" gas chromatograph equipped with a TCD and a Teflon column (3-m length, 3-mm i.d.) with a "Hayesep C" sorbent modified with 0.5% H3PO4. The space velocity of the He carrier gas was 30 cm3/min, and the operating temperature of the column was 150 ℃.

Experimental data were presented in terms of hydrogen sulfide conversion and sulfur selectivity as a function of temperature. The H2S conversion (XH2S, %) and selectivity of H2S oxidation to sulfur (SS, %) were calculated from experimental concentrations of reagents and products using the following equations:

where CH2S0 is the concentration of hydrogen sulfide (vol%) in the feed, and CH2S, CSO2, and CCOS are the concentrations of hydrogen sulfide (vol%), sulfur dioxide (vol%), and COS (vol%) at the reactor outlet. The temperature dependences of H2S conversion and selectivities of sulfur production were used to compare the catalytic behaviors of aluminas with various crystal modifications.

3 Results and discussion
3.1 Catalytic activity of alumina with different crystal modifications

Fig. 1 displays the catalytic characteristics of aluminas in the direct oxidation of H2S according to the reaction, H2S + 1/2O2 = 1/n Sn + H2O, where n = 6 or 8, at 100-300 ℃. The total H2S conversion and selectivity of H2S transformation to sulfur are represented. The experimental data show that the crystal modification of alumina significantly affects the catalytic activity. The total H2S conversion over alumina at 250 ℃ increases as α-Al2O3 < γ-Al2O3 < (γ+15%χ)-Al2O3 < (γ+35%χ)-Al2O3 < (γ+50%χ)-Al2O3 ~ (γ+90%χ)-Al2O3. Maximum H2S conversion of 80%-90% occurred over samples containing mixtures of γ-Al2O3 with 35-90 wt% χ-Al2O3. H2S conversion over γ-Al2O3 and α-Al2O3 increased with temperature and achieved a maximum value at 375-400 ℃. Maximum H2S conversion over samples containing χ-Al2O3 occurred at temperatures as low as 300 ℃ for 15 wt% χ-Al2O3 and 250 ℃ for 50–90 wt% χ-Al2O3. H2S conversion over samples containing χ-Al2O3 diminished slightly at temperatures above 300 ℃.

Fig. 1. Total H2S conversion (A) and sulfur selectivity (B) in H2S oxidation on aluminas. (1) γ-Al2O3, (2) (γ+15%χ)-Al2O3, (3) (γ+35%χ)-Al2O3, (4) (γ+50%χ)-Al2O3, (5) (γ+90%χ)-Al2O3, (6) α-Al2O3.

Selectivity with regard to sulfur formation was nearly 100% at 200 ℃ for alumina samples with different crystal modifications. The main products of H2S oxidation by O2 are sulfur and water; SO2 and COS are not observed under these conditions. At 250 ℃, we observed SO2 among the reaction products and gradually diminished sulfur selectivity due to the reaction, H2S + 3/2 O2 → H2O + SO2, and the reverse Claus process, 3S + 2H2O ↔2H2S + SO2. The phenomenon is more pronounced at higher temperatures, because sulfur oxidation becomes prevalent under these conditions. When the temperature was increased to 400 ℃, sulfur selectivity decreased to 90%-92% on γ-Al2O3 and α-Al2O3 and to 82% on (γ+35%χ)-Al2O3. The effect of temperature on the change in sulfur selectivity is enhanced with χ-Al2O3. A greater χ-Al2O3 content leads to lower sulfur selectivity at 400 ℃ as shown in Fig. 1(B). Thus, SS was only 53% for the 90% χ-Al2O3 sample.

The results above are in accord with those in the literature [16, 21, 25]. The same tendencies are observed for catalysts containing Fe2O3 and Cr2O3 supported on alumina [16, 25], silica [16, 21], zirconia [16], and other oxide materials. These catalysts exhibit high selectivity and efficiency of H2S conversion to elemental sulfur at temperatures close to or slightly above the sulfur dew point, but selectivity diminishes due to SO2 formation at higher reaction temperatures. For example, Fe2O3/γ-Al2O3 provides 92% H2S conversion and 96% sulfur selectivity at 230 ℃ [25], although the GHSV was half that of our experiments (3000 versus 6000 h–1). Conversion increased to 98%-99% with increasing temperature, but sulfur selectivity decreased and did not exceed 41% at 350 ℃ [25]. On the low surface area α-Al2O3 modification [16], efficient H2S conversions (97%-98%) were achieved with Fe2O3/α-Al2O3 at 280-400 ℃, although sulfur selectivity began to deteriorate (70%-85% at GHSV = 3000–12000 h–1). Thus, 35 wt% χ-Al2O3 aluminas are more active and more selective in H2S → S oxidation at 200–300 ℃. Their catalytic behavior is comparable to, and in some cases greater than, that of the supported Fe2O3 catalysts mentioned in the literature.

To study the catalytic stability of χ-alumina, we tested it in a H2S/O2/He feed at 300 ℃ for 50 h and compared the results with those for γ-Al2O3. The results of the stability test are illustrated in Fig. 2. Both materials catalyzed the oxidation of H2S to sulfur without deactivation for at least 50 h under a stoichiometric H2S/O2 mixture at 300 ℃. The (γ+35%χ)-Al2O3 catalyst was more active and produced more sulfur compared with γ-Al2O3 in the stability tests. The mean sulfur yield over (γ+35%χ)-Al2O3 was 78%-82%, which is slightly less than the value allowed by thermodynamics (88%). The mean sulfur yield over γ-Al2O3 was nearly 50%. Ceramic supports prone to formation of sulfates (MgO, ZrO2, TiO2, and Al2O3) are generally believed [16] to exhibit poor characteristics in the oxidation of hydrogen sulfide to sulfur and to be deactivated under the reaction conditions. In contrast to [16], we observed good stability in the catalytic behavior of the (γ+35%χ)-Al2O3 catalyst.

Fig. 2. Total H2S conversion (1), sulfur selectivity (2), SO2 selectivity (3) and sulfur production (4) in H2S oxidation on aluminas. (A) γ-Al2O3, (B) (γ+35%χ)-Al2O3. Curve (5) shows sulfur production allowed by thermodynamics.

Table 2 shows the material balance of H2S oxidation over γ-Al2O3 and (γ+35%χ)-Al2O3 following a stability test. The catalysts provided average H2S conversions of 55% and 85%, respectively, at 300 ℃ (Fig. 2). The main sulfur-containing products were sulfur and sulfur dioxide. The average selectivities for these products were 95% and 4%, respectively, on γ-Al2O3 and 92% and 7% on (γ+35%χ)-Al2O3. Some sulfur deposited on the catalysts. According to XRF analysis, spent γ-Al2O3 and (γ+35%χ)-Al2O3 samples accumulated 0.23 and 0.42 wt% sulfur, respectively, during the experiment. The minimum deviation of the sulfur material balance is ≤5%, which can be attributed to the uncertainty of the measurements.

Table 2
Material balance of the H2S oxidation for sulfur.
3.2 Catalytic activity of cation/anion modified aluminas

The catalytic properties of aluminas modified with Mg2+ cations or Cl and SO42– anions are shown in Fig. 3. The (γ+15%χ)-Al2O3 sample modified with Mg2+ produced 82% H2S conversion at 200-400 °C. This value was 20% greater than that achieved with the unmodified sample at 250 °C and differed by only 5% at 300 °C. Moreover, the sulfur selectivity over Mg2+/(γ+15%χ)-Al2O3 equaled 93%-94% at 350 °C and above (Fig. 3, curve (2)). The results were superior to those obtained with the unmodified sample.

Fig. 3. Total H2S conversion (A) and sulfur selectivity (B) in H2S oxidation on aluminas. (1) (g+15%χ)-Al2O3, (2) MgO/(γ+15%χ)-Al2O3, (3) SO42–/(γ+15%χ)-Al2O3, (4) Cl/(γ+15%χ)-Al2O3.

Modification of (γ+15%χ)-alumina by sulfate ions was accompanied by a deterioration in catalytic performance. Hydrogen sulfide conversion was significantly reduced at temperatures below 300 ℃ and slightly so above 300 ℃ (Fig. 3(A), curve (3)). The selectivity of sulfur formation was reduced by 5%-10% over the entire temperature range (Fig. 3(B), curve (3)). Modification of (γ+15%χ)-Al2O3 with chloride ions resulted in a dramatic decrease in H2S conversion, although selectivity increased to 100% at temperatures above 350 ℃ (Fig. 3, curve (4)).

3.3 Surface acidity of aluminas with different crystal modifications

We used NH3-TPD and FTIR spectroscopy of adsorbed CO as molecular probes of Lewis and Brønsted acid sites to study the surface properties of aluminas. The FTIR spectra of CO adsorbed on alumina with γ, (γ+χ), and α crystal modifications, which are presented in Fig. 4, are discussed first. Absorption bands at 2186, 2210, and 2216 cm–1 in the CO stretching region occur in the spectrum of γ-Al2O3 at 20 ℃. There also are bands at 2147 and 2156 cm–1 in the –196 ℃ spectrum. After addition of χ-phase Al2O3 to γ-Al2O3, new bands appear at 2195-2197 and 2200-2206 cm–1, and the band at 2147 cm–1 vanishes. The frequencies of two absorption bands increase with increasing χ-phase content: 2186 and 2195 cm–1 for (g+15%c)-Al2O3, 2187 and 2197 cm–1 for (γ+35%χ)-Al2O3, and 2189 and 2194 cm–1 for (γ+50%χ)-Al2O3 and (γ+90%χ)-Al2O3. Also, when the χ-phase content equals or exceeds 50%, the bands at 2210 and 2220 cm–1 reappear in the spectrum. According to published data [20, 40, 41], the absorption bands at 2140-2155 cm–1 are attributed to CO hydrogen-bonded to hydroxyl groups on the alumina surface. The bands at 2210-2240 and 2180-2200 cm–1 are assigned [38, 40-45] to surface LAS that are characterized as unsaturated aluminum cations (Al3+) with tetrahedral coordination [41, 43, 45] at crystallographic defects [46] and with octahedral coordination [44, 45] at the regular defects of low-index crystallite faces [45-47], respectively. Shifting of the 2143 cm–1 frequency to greater wavenumbers indicates an increase in the heat of CO adsorption and the strength of the LAS [38, 43, 44]. Lewis acid sites are commonly classified as weak (2180-2205 cm–1), medium (2205-2220 cm–1), and strong (2220-2245 cm–1) according to the heat of CO adsorption [38, 43].

Fig. 4. FT-IR spectra of CO adsorbed on aluminas with γ, (g+χ), and α crystal modifications at different coverage of the surface with CO. The upper spectra were recorded at temperature –196 ℃ and the lower spectra at room temperature, the others–at increasing temperature up to ambient.

Table 3 lists the Lewis and Br nsted acidities determined from the FTIR spectra of CO adsorbed on aluminas. The table shows that γ-Al2O3 and (γ+χ)-Al2O3 primarily contain weak LAS with a heat of adsorption equal to 32-38 kJ/mol [38, 44] and a CO stretching vibration at 2185-2197 cm–1. Examination of FTIR data for samples containing χ-Al2O3 shows that the disordered χ-Al2O3 phase contributes significantly to the weak LAS content with a maximal concentration observed at 35% χ-phase. γ-Al2O3, (γ+90%χ)-Al2O3, and α-Al2O3 samples also have a small amount of intermediate strength LAS, which is confirmed by high frequency absorption bands at 2210, 2220, and 2212 cm–1, respectively. Their heats of absorption are equal to 42-49 kJ/mole [38, 44]. Thus, aluminas with γ, γ+χ, and α crystal modifications differ significantly in their surface acidity. The total LAS concentrations and strengths of g-Al2O3 and (γ+90%χ)-Al2O3 samples are close to those observed for γ-and χ-aluminas [40, 48].

Table 3
The strength and concentration of the Lewis and Br nsted acidic sites on the surface of alumina with different crystal modification.

The integrated intensities of the 2150-2162 cm–1 absorptions are believed [42] to give semiquantitative information on the BAS content of alumina. H-bonding of CO with surface hydroxyl groups is characterized by an absorption band at 2150-2162 cm–1[20, 38, 43, 49] and a shift of the relevant OH-group frequencies to lower values by 80-90 cm–1 [39-41] or 125 cm–1 [49]. These OH-groups are generally assigned to bridging hydroxyls coordinated to two or three octahedral Al3+ ions [46]. The OH-groups are characterized by absorption bands at 3735, 3710, 3690, and 3670 cm–1 [38, 46] and weakly acidic properties with a proton affinity of 1420 ± 20 kJ/mol [38]. In rare instances, assignment of the 3725-3745 cm–1 band to terminal Al3+ cations with octa-[45], penta-[47] and tetrahedral[49] coordination is disputed. The BAS contents calculated from the integrated intensities of the 2150-2162 cm–1 bands are presented in Table 3. Among the aluminas studied, γ-Al2O3 contains the most proton acid sites. The number of such sites decreases as the fraction of the χ-phase increases. α-Al2O3 has minimal BAS content. The data obtained correlate qualitatively with the results of [48], which examined the concentration of terminal and bridging OH-groups on aluminas with γ-and χ-crystal modifications using FTIR spectroscopy in the OH stretching region (3580-3800 cm–1).

The surface acidity of alumina also was evaluated by NH3-TPD. The number of sites capable of ammonia chemisorption is assumed [50] to be sum of the Br nsted acid (proton donor) and moderately strong Lewis acid (electron acceptor) sites having OH and CO vibrational frequencies of 3688 and 2200-2210 cm–1, respectively. According to published data, weak Lewis acid sites with ν(CO) = 2180-2195 cm–1 [38, 43] and weakly acidic OH-groups with ν(OH) = 3750-3780 cm–1 and a proton affinity of 1590 kJ/mol [38, 40, 41] are not observed by NH3–TPD due to formation of weak physical bonds with NH3 [50]. The latter are removed by purging with helium at 75-100 ℃ before NH3–TPD. The NH3–TPD profiles of unmodified aluminas are shown in Fig. 5(A). The total acid site content estimated by NH3–TPD is indicated in Table 3. The γ-Al2O3 sample is characterized by ammonia desorption over a wide temperature range with pronounced maxima at 200, 355, and 530 ℃ and shoulders at 460 and 615 ℃. The peaks correspond to ammonia desorption from different acidic sites, which are divided [50] according to the energy of ammonia chemisorption into Lewis acid sites (200–400 ℃) and Br nsted acid sites (400–600 ℃). The LAS and BAS contributions to the total acidity of the sample are comparable. The proton acid sites have ammonia desorption energies greater than 150 kJ/mol. Moderately strong LAS are characterized by ammonia desorption energies of 85-110 and 110-150 kJ/mol. The (γ+90%χ)-Al2O3 sample has a broad asymmetric ammonia desorption peak with a maximum at 415 ℃ and a shoulder at 530 ℃. These features correspond to Lewis acid and Br nsted acid sites, respectively. Moderately strong LAS with an NH3 desorption energy of 110-150 kJ/mol make a greater contribution to the total sample acidity. The BAS content is much lower than in the γ-Al2O3 sample. The NH3-TPD experiments show that the acidic properties of (γ+15%χ)-Al2O3 and (γ+35%χ)-Al2O3 are a superposition of the γ-and χ-phase characteristics. An increase in the c-phase content leads to an increase in the number of moderately strong LAS with an ammonia desorption energy of 110-150 kJ/mol and a decrease in the BAS and weaker LAS contributions. The total acidity of the two-phase samples, which was calculated from the amount of ammonia desorbed by NH3-TPD, is less than that of the pure γ-phase and χ-phase aluminas. For γ-Al2O3 and (γ+χ)-Al2O3, the NH3-TPD results are consistent with the FTIR data of adsorbed carbon monoxide.

Fig. 5. NH3-TPD spectra for different Al2O3 samples. (A) the unmodified ones with crystal phase γ (1), (γ+15%χ) (2), (γ+35%χ) (3), and (γ+90%χ) (4); (B) samples of (γ+15%χ)-Al2O3 (1) modified by MgO (2), SO42– (3) and Cl (4).
3.4 Surface acidity of cation/anion modified aluminas

Fig. 6 shows spectra of CO adsorbed on the surface of (γ+15%χ)-Al2O3 modified with Mg2+, SO42–, and Cl ions. CO adsorption on the MgO-modified sample yields an absorption band at 2154 cm–1, which corresponds to the vibration of CO adsorbed at acidic OH sites [38, 43, 49], and a band at 2181-2193 cm–1 belonging to the vibration of CO adsorbed on LAS [38, 40, 41, 43]. The frequency shifts from 2187 to 2181 cm–1 and from 2197 to 2193 cm–1 indicate a decrease in LAS strength [41, 43]. This is accompanied by a twofold increase in the concentration of Al3+ LAS. The strengths and concentrations of LAS and BAS sites on the surface of modified alumina samples are given in Table 3.

Fig. 6. FT-IR spectra of CO adsorbed on (γ+15%χ)-Al2O3 samples modified by MgO, SO42– and Cl at different coverage of the surface with CO. The upper spectra were recorded at temperature –196 ℃ and the lower spectra–at room temperature, other spectra–at increasing of temperature up to ambient.

CO adsorption on (10%)sulfate-modified (γ+15%χ)-Al2O3 produces absorption bands at 2210 cm–1 and 2199 cm–1, which are attributed to CO adsorbed on intermediate and weak Al3+ LAS [40, 43], respectively. The LAS strength of the 2210 cm–1 band is 35%-45% greater than that of the sites of the original (γ+15%χ)-alumina. However, the number of LAS decreases significantly. There also is a band at 2168 cm–1, which is assigned to CO H-bonded to hydroxyl groups on the catalyst surface [38, 43, 49]. Their concentration changes little compared to unmodified (γ+15%χ)-alumina, but their proton acidity increases markedly.

FTIR spectra of CO adsorbed on Cl-modified (γ+15%χ)-Al2O3 exhibit two types of LAS on the catalyst surface. These are characterized by absorption bands at 2191 and 2198 cm–1. Their strength is slightly greater (by 10%-15%) than that of unmodified alumina. The Cl-modified sample has twice as many Lewis acid (νCO = 2195-2198 cm–1) and Br nsted acid (νCO = 2154 cm–1) sites, while the number of LAS with νCO = 2186-2191 cm–1 is comparable to that of the unmodified sample. This occurs, because interaction of HCl with an > Al-O-Al < fragment [2] forms terminal > Al-OH (band at 2154 cm–1) and > Al-Cl (band at 2198 cm–1) groups. The chloride ion content of the calcined Cl/(γ+15%χ)-Al2O3 sample was less than of the sample impregnated with hydrochloric acid and dried in air, because chloride ions are partially removed as AlCl3 or HCl during thermal treatment at 500 ℃ [51].

The NH3-TPD profiles of modified aluminas are shown in Fig. 5(B). Ammonia desorption from MgO-and Cl-modified samples begins at lower temperatures (200 and 250 ℃) than from unmodified (γ+15%χ)-Al2O3 (400 ℃) and continues to 600 ℃. The majority of NH3 desorbs from Cl/(γ+15%χ)-Al2O3 and MgO/(γ+15%χ)-Al2O3 at temperatures of 295 ℃ (85-110 kJ/mol) and 415-430 ℃ (110-150 kJ/mol), respectively, which indicates the presence of weaker LAS sites with lower ammonia desorption energies than in the unmodified sample. NH3 amount from unmodified and MgO-modified (γ+15%χ)-Al2O3 at 500–700 ℃ are the same indicating similar BAS concentrations in these samples. The BAS content is somewhat less in Cl/(γ+15%χ)-Al2O3. Sulfate(5%)-modified and unmodified (γ+15%χ)-Al2O3 desorb ammonia over the same temperature range (400–700 ℃), but the intensity of NH3 desorption from the modified sample is greater. Because this peak can be a superposition of ammonia and sulfur dioxide desorptions, the BAS concentration (Table 3) determined in this temperature range can be overestimated. SO2 evolution during NH3-TPD experiments was previously reported for sulfated alumina samples and was attributed to a redox reaction between sulfate groups and adsorbed NH3 [52].

Modification of alumina with Cl and Mg2+ ions alters surface acidity primarily by formation of more Lewis acid sites, whereas sulfate ions increase the BAS content. Chlorination of (γ+15%χ)-alumina significantly changes the strength of the LAS notably by decreasing the ammonia desorption energy from 110-150 to 85-100 kJ/mol. The trends of increasing concentration of protonated and deprotonated sites, which we observe for (γ+15%χ)-alumina modified by Mg2+ or sulfate/chloride ions, respectively, are consistent with the data published in [41] for modified γ-Al2O3 samples.

3.5 Textural properties of aluminas with different crystal modifications

The textural properties of aluminas with γ, (γ+15%χ), and (γ+35%χ) crystal modifications, including alumina modified by Mg2+ cations, have been described in detail by Ismagilov et al. [33, 36, 37]. Some of these data are discussed below. The isotherms of low temperature nitrogen adsorption on aluminas with γ, γ+χ, and α crystal morphologies and aluminas modified by Mg2+ or sulfate/chloride ions are shown in Fig. 7. It is known [53, 54] that a phase transition from γ-Al2O3 to α-Al2O3, which are low-and high-temperature modifications of alumina, respectively, leads to a sharp change in textural characteristics (Fig. 7, curves (1) and (7)). Modification of γ-Al2O3 by addition of the low-temperature χ-form up to 35 wt% does not lead to a significant change in texture. Low-temperature nitrogen adsorption isotherms of γ-Al2O3 and (γ+15%χ)-Al2O3 are type Ⅳ, which is characteristic of 2-to 50-nm microporous or mesoporous materials having some pores filled with capillary condensed nitrogen as the saturation vapor pressure is approached. A hysteresis loop is present in the adsorption isotherms of γ-Al2O3 and its mixture with χ-Al2O3. In the low-temperature nitrogen adsorption isotherms (Fig. 7(a)), there are tendencies for increased nitrogen adsorption with increasing χ-alumina content and for saturation of the pores at somewhat greater relative pressures. This trend usually indicates a change in the pore size and shape of porous materials, which we observe in pore-size distribution curves (Fig. 7(b)). The samples based on γ-Al2O3 and (γ+15-35%χ)-Al2O3 are biporous, and the fraction of ≤ 4-nm pores decreases while that of 7-to 20-nm pores increases with increasing χ-phase content. The prevailing pore size also increases from 7 nm for γ-Al2O3 to 11-12 nm for (γ+15%χ)-Al2O3 and to 14-15 nm for (γ+35%χ)-Al2O3. In addition, the specific surface areas calculated by Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) and Barrett-Joyner-Halenda (BJH) for low-temperature alumina samples differ by approximately 30%. This means that the pore-size distribution curves indicate ~70% of the material to be mesoporous. The remaining pores are less than 3-nm in size and are not represented in the distribution curves (Fig. 7(b)). The pore-size distribution of α-Al2O3 is markedly heterogeneous. The distribution maximum occurs at 4 nm, and larger 5-, 8-, and 40-nm pores also are present. However, the contribution of micropores and mesopores is insignificant, because the ratio of micro/mesopore to macropore volumes is about 0.07. The α-Al2O3 sample possesses a very small surface area (9.3 m2/g).

Fig. 7. Nitrogen adsorption isotherms (a) and pore size distribution (b) for aluminas with γ (1), (γ+15%χ) (2), (γ+35%χ) (3), and α (7) crystal phases, and (γ+15%χ)-Al2O3 modified by MgO (4), SO42– (5) and Cl (6).

The low-temperature nitrogen adsorption isotherms for modified (γ+15%χ)-Al2O3 shown in Fig. 7(a) (curves (4)-(6)) are type Ⅳ, as are the isotherms of the unmodified sample. However, at the same relative adsorbate pressure, the Mg2+-and Cl-modified samples bind less adsorbate and reach saturation at lower pressures relative to the unmodified sample. The textural characteristics of modified MgO/(γ+15%χ)-Al2O3 and Cl/(γ+15%χ)-Al2O3 are close to those of the unmodified sample. The specific surface area is about 150-165 m2/g, and the micro/mesopore volume is about 0.49-0.58 cm3/g. These values indicate a homogeneous distribution of modifying ions over the alumina surface. A comparison of nitrogen adsorption isotherms of MgO/(γ+15%χ)-Al2O3, Cl/(γ+15%χ)-Al2O3, and (γ+15%χ)-Al2O3 reveals a slight increase in the fraction of fine (3-to 4-nm) pores and a decrease in size (from 11-12 to 9 nm) of large pores, which indicates near-surface localization of the modifying ions.

The textural characteristics of (γ+15%χ)-Al2O3 modified with sulfate ions depend on the sulfate ion content. For example, the sample texture changes slightly when 1-2.5 wt% of the modifier is added. This amount corresponds no more than of that required for monolayer coverage of sulfate ions on the (γ+15%χ)-Al2O3 surface. An increase in sulfate ion loading (up to 7.5-10 wt%) leads to creation of a uniformly porous sample with a large pore size (14-15 nm instead of 11-12 nm; Fig. 7(b), curve (5)), but with a small specific surface area (120-135 versus 167 m2/g) and a reduced pore volume (0.40-0.46 versus 0.55 cm3/g) relative to the unmodified sample. These changes may be due to the surface dissolution of alumina to aluminum sulfate during impregnation with sulfuric acid and to precipitation of Al2(SO4)3 into the larger pores upon calcination. Some mesopores may be transformed into ≤3-nm micropores and not observed in the pore-size distribution curves. This possibility is suggested by the difference in the BET and BJH specific surface areas by a factor of 1.25-1.40. The data obtained on the texture of modified alumina samples are in good agreement with the results of [41, 52] from one perspective. However, a monolayer coating by four sulfate groups per nm2 [55] usually is achieved at concentrations of 10-12.5 wt% depending on the specific Al2O3 surface [52]. A monolayer coating was achieved at 5 wt% SO42– with our (γ+15%χ)-Al2O3 sample. The apparent contradiction can be explained by the presence of NO3 groups in the initial alumina sample, which decreases the number of centers for sulfate ion stabilization. A decrease in BAS concentration and an increase in LAS concentration were observed for γ-Al2O3 obtained by peptizing pseudoboehmite with nitric acid [56]. We used pastes peptized with nitric acid to obtain granular samples of γ-Al2O3, (γ+15%χ)-Al2O3, and (γ+35%χ)-Al2O3.

3.6 Discussion
3.6.1 Correlation between surface acid properties and catalytic behaviors of aluminas

Many aluminas are used as a catalyst support for the selective oxidation of hydrogen sulfide [18, 34, 35]. Thus, it is interesting to note that alumina also contributes to the activity and selectivity of the overlying catalyst. Hydrogen sulfide oxidation data for aluminas with different crystal modifications indicate that samples containing a mixture of γ-Al2O3 with 35-90 wt% χ-Al2O3 exhibit the greatest catalytic activity. These samples provide 94%-99% selective sulfur formation at temperatures below 300 ℃, but differ in their selectivity above 300 ℃. Differences in sulfur selectivity can be explained by both the textural (surface area, pore volume, and pore-size distribution) and acidic properties of the aluminas. Pure γ-Al2O3 and samples modified with χ-Al2O3 are characterized by large specific surface areas of 214 and 160-166 m2/g, respectively. Although these values differ by 25%, the disparity does not clarify the differences in catalytic behavior. Greater H2S conversion and sulfur selectivity occur with small specific surface area of low-temperature crystal modifications of alumina. The effect of textural properties on sulfur selectivity is more pronounced for α-Al2O3, whose textural characteristics differ greatly from those of low-temperature modifications of alumina. Unlike the low-temperature examples of γ-Al2O3 and (γ+χ)-Al2O3, the sample of α-Al2O3 is a wide-pore material with a small surface area. Thus, sulfur selectivity over α-Al2O3 decreases from 100% to 90% even at 250 ℃. The effect of catalyst pore structure on the selectivity of hydrogen sulfide oxidation is known [57-59] to be associated with the capillary condensation of sulfur vapor in narrow pores. Capillary condensation was observed in zeolites and on activated carbon [16, 60], where H2S is oxidized primarily to elemental sulfur. The latter is effective in the selective oxidation of hydrogen sulfide [61].

According to literature data [62], adsorption of hydrogen sulfide on BAS does not activate H2S, but Lewis acid and basic sites activate and decompose H2S to SH and H groups. Thus, we decided to investigate the correlation between LAS content and the catalytic oxidation of H2S by aluminas. Fig. 8(a) displays hydrogen sulfide conversion as a function of the weak LAS content that is characterized by heats of CO adsorption of 32-35 kJ/mol and FTIR bands at 2186-2195 cm–1. These LAS prevail in low-temperature aluminas. The concentration of weak LAS on the alumina surface unambiguously influences hydrogen sulfide oxidation activity. H2S conversion increases linearly with the weak LAS content at 200 ℃. H2S conversion also increases with LAS content at 250 and 300 ℃, reaches a maximum at 800-830 μmol/g, and changes only slightly thereafter. Modification of (γ-15%χ)-Al2O3 with MgO confirms this supposition by increasing H2S conversion from 50% to 62% at 200-250 ℃ accompanied by an increase (from 630 to 1250 μmol/g) in the concentration of LAS. At 300 ℃, the difference between the activity of the MgO-modified and unmodified samples (g-15%c)-Al2O3 becomes inconsequential. Surface modification of (γ+15%χ)-Al2O3 with sulfate ion (~10 wt%) completely suppresses the formation of weak LAS based on FTIR evidence. Thus, the activity of the sulfate-treated sample is diminished relative to that of the unmodified sample at temperatures below 250 ℃. When the temperature is greater than 300 ℃, the effect of sulfate ion on H2S conversion and sulfur selectivity becomes less pronounced.

Fig. 8. H2S conversion on the aluminas vs. content of LAS of weak strength (a.b. 2186 cm–1) (a) and BAS (a.b. 2155–2161 cm–1) (b). There are also presented data for the sulfate-modified alumina (circle symbols, a.b. 2199–2210 cm–1), the chloride-modified alumina (triangle symbols, a.b. 2191 cm–1) and the MgO-modified alumina (rhombus symbols, a.b. 2181 cm–1).

Addition of Cl (1 wt%) to (γ+15%χ)-Al2O3 significantly deactivates the catalyst. The maximum H2S conversion is only 35%. According to FTIR spectroscopy, the acidic properties of the alumina surface change relative to those of the unmodified sample. The number of weak LAS increases some and their strength increases slightly (10%-15%), whereas the intermediate LAS content (38 kJ/mol) doubles. Chlorination of γ-alumina by hydrochloric acid is known [2, 41] to enhance the Br nsted acidity of the surface, whereas Al3+ LAS become bound by chloride anions [2, 4, 5]. On the one hand, correlation between the surface acidic properties of Cl-modified alumina and its diminished catalytic activity does not support our hypothesis of the key role of LAS in H2S oxidation. On the other hand, the decrease in catalytic activity is likely caused by the negative effect of Cl- ion plus the increased concentration of BAS. The presence of chloride ions on the alumina surface and their interaction with Al3+ inhibit adsorption of hydrogen sulfide, because the latter is a weaker acid than HCl. BAS do not activate H2S during adsorption [62].

Fig. 8(b) illustrates the relationship between hydrogen sulfide conversion and BAS content in aluminas. A threefold increase in BAS content (from 60 to 160 μmol/g) on the surface of low-temperature aluminas has no practical effect on the catalytic oxidation of hydrogen sulfide at 250-300 ℃. Although an increase in BAS content of only 6% in (γ+15%χ)-Al2O3 is critical for H2S conversion at 250 ℃, it does not influence conversion at 300 ℃. The large BAS content in γ-alumina and its small content in α-Al2O3 both lead to a decrease in catalytic activity. The properties of modified (γ+15%χ)-Al2O3 cannot be described using this acidity-performance relationship.

No correlation was established between the ability of aluminas to oxidize hydrogen sulfide and the total concentration of acid sites determined by NH3-TPD. This is explicable, because intermediate and strong LAS and proton sites are NH3-TPD visible, whereas weak LAS are NH3-TPD silent due to weak bond formation with NH3 [50]. According FTIR, the latter sites are active in the selective oxidation of hydrogen sulfide to sulfur.

3.6.2 Correlation between the acidic and catalytic properties of sulfate-modified aluminas

To strengthen our hypothesis concerning the effect of weak LAS on low-temperature aluminas on their selective catalytic oxidation of H2S, a series of the sulfate-modified (γ+15%χ)-Al2O3 samples were prepared and characterized by FTIR spectroscopy. The sulfate content was varied from 1.25 to 10 wt%. Assuming that four sulfate groups can be stabilized on 1 nm2 of alumina, the 10 wt% SO42– concentrations should be close at monolayer coverage.

According to FTIR data (Table 3 and Fig. 4), two types of weak Al3+-LAS (bands at 2195 and 2186 cm–1) are observed for unmodified (γ+15%χ)-Al2O3. The LAS detected in sulfate-modified samples (Fig. 6) can be classified into three groups. The first are weak LAS, which are characterized by a heat of CO adsorption less than 38 kJ/mol (νCO = 2180-2198 cm‑1). The second are those with a heat of CO adsorption close to 39 kJ/mol (nCO = 2199-2200 cm–1), and the third are intermediate sites with a heat of adsorption greater than 40 kJ/mol (νCO = 2205-2216 cm–1).

The FTIR-detected concentrations of weak and intermediate LAS on aluminas as a function of sulfate loading are shown in Fig. 9. An increase in SO42– loading of modified (γ+15%χ)-Al2O3 results in a sharp decrease in the concentration of weak LAS (ν = 2180-2198 cm–1). At the same time, the number of intermediate LAS (ν = 2199 and 2210 cm–1) increases and reaches a maximum value when the SO42– content is near 5 wt%. Compared to the unmodified material, the total concentration of LAS sites decreases significantly in 10% SO42–/(γ+15%χ)-Al2O3. The SO42– coverage on the alumina surface (θSO4) was evaluated to explain this phenomenon. qSO4 was calculated on the assumption that an SO42‑ anion occupies an area of 7 × 7 Å. Fig. 9 shows that the maximum concentrations of intermediate LAS (ν = 2199 and 2210 cm–1) are observed at θSO4 near 1.0–1.1 monolayer. Prior to reaching monolayer coverage, sulfate ions on an alumina surface have been shown [55, 63, 64] to exist as isolated, multicentered, and bridging groups. Note that the monolayer on our (g+15%c)-Al2O3, unlike γ-Al2O3[63, 64], is achieved when the sulfate ion content is about 5 wt%. Polymeric sulfate species, which form at sulfate loadings above 5 wt% [64], predominate in multilayers [63, 64]. There could be trace amounts of Al2(SO4)3·xH2O crystallites, which can be identified by XRD [52, 64]. We have not detected a crystalline aluminum sulfate phase by XRD even in 10%SO42–/(γ+15%χ)-Al2O3, although the aluminum sulfate particles could be amorphous. Therefore, the decrease in concentration of deprotonated surface sites with increasing SO42– can be accounted for by a blocking of the surface sites by sulfate anions via formation of polymeric sulfate species and amorphous aluminum sulfate. This conclusion is consistent with Yang's results [63]. Their analysis showed that the acidity of sulfate species on an alumina surface decreases as surface sulfates > multilayer sulfates > aluminum sulfate. Surface sulfates possess greater acidity due to the induction of Lewis superacid sites, multilayer sulfates have weaker acidity due to the increased concentration of Br nsted acid sites, and crystallized aluminum sulfate is neutral [63].

Fig. 9. Concentration of LAS vs. loading of sulfate ions in the modified alumina.

We next seek to find a relationship between H2S conversion and the concentration of LAS sites of different strength. Fig. 10 shows that the correlation between H2S conversion and the concentration of weak LAS (ν = 2186 cm–1) is similar to that obtained for alumina with different crystal modifications (Fig. 8). Activity increases with weak LAS content and reaches an optimum value near 250-300 μmol/g at 200 ℃ and 400-500 μmol/g at 250 ℃ (Fig. 10(A)). Further increase in the weak LAS concentration does not result in a noticeable change in catalytic activity. Nonlinear trends are observed for intermediate LAS characterized by ν = 2199 and 2210 cm–1 (Fig. 10(B), and (С)). H2S conversion decreases linearly at first with increasing LAS concentration, but then reaches a minimum and begins to grow with increasing LAS content. Careful analysis of these dependences (Fig. 10(B), and (C)) shows that the minimum values of H2S conversion correspond to modified aluminas with a sulfate content of 7.5 wt% and above. This sulfate coverage amounts to more than a monolayer. If these points are removed from the experimental curves and only 1.25-5 wt% sulfate concentrations are considered, H2S conversion is practically independent of the intermediate LAS concentration at 200 ℃ and changes only slightly at 250 ℃. Therefore, we assume that the low activity of highly concentrated (7.5–10 wt%) SO42–-modified alumina samples is connected with a change in phase composition, specifically formation of a multilayer sulfate film and highly dispersed X-ray amorphous aluminum sulfate. The latter has no acidity [63].

Fig. 10. Conversion of hydrogen sulfide at 200 ℃ (close symbols) and 250 ℃ (open symbols) vs. the concentration of LAS Al3+ characterized by absorption bands at 2186 cm–1 (A), 2199 cm–1 (B) and 2210 cm–1 (C) assigned to adsorbed CO. The content (wt%) of sulfate ions in the alumina sample is indicate by the numbers. Area, where the sample properties alter due to change of its phase composition, is marked by the rectangle.

The experimental data confirm that weak LAS enable the catalytic oxidation of H2S by unmodified aluminas with different crystal modifications (γ, χ, α) and aluminas modified by Mg2+, Cl-, and SO42- ions. The effect depends strongly on temperature with the greatest effect observed below 300 ℃.

3.6.3 Study of hydrogen sulfide adsorption

In the catalytic reactions of hydrogen sulfide oxidation [12, 18, 20] and decomposition [65], adsorption of H2S on the catalyst surface is thought to be necessary for H2S activation and its transformation to sulfide or sulfite/sulfate complexes [62, 66]. Although H2S adsorption on g-Al2O3 has been studied in detail [62, 66-68], there are debates concerning the nature of the sites involved in H2S adsorption. H2S adsorbs in molecular form on proton sites of γ-Al2O3 [62, 67]. It adsorbs dissociatively on basic sites such surface oxygen [67, 69]. H2S also is thought to adsorb both dissociatively and in molecular form on strong LAS. Physical adsorption of hydrogen sulfide on the surface of oxide catalysts can be accompanied by its oxidation to surface sulfite/sulfate complexes [22, 24, 70]. The bridging lattice oxygen of the catalyst or oxygen adsorbed on the surface is consumed in H2S oxidation [71]. However, oxidation on g-Al2O3 is hindered by the low mobility of surface oxygen [68].

Fig. 11 displays FTIR spectra of H2S adsorbed on the surface of the aluminas. The results of the experiments are summarized in Table 4. The spectra of H2S-treated aluminas at 20 ℃ exhibit absorption bands at 1330-1333, 1557-1575, and 2555-2588 cm–1 (the last is not shown in Fig. 11). Free H2S has three vibrations in the IR region: 2722 (ν1), 1215 (ν2), and 2739 (ν3) cm–1 [72]. These shift due to interaction with the surface of a heterogeneous catalyst [68-75]. The bands at 1330-1333 and 2555-2588 cm–1 are the bending and stretching vibrations of physically adsorbed hydrogen sulfide or chemisorbed HS, respectively [68-71, 73-75]. The band at 2588 cm–1 in the spectrum of α-Al2O3 treated with H2S indicates that the broad band at 1330-1368 cm–1 belongs to vibrations of physically adsorbed hydrogen sulfide. The band at 1557-1575 cm–1 is not unambiguously assigned to a specific vibration of any S-containing species, and its origin is still hotly debated [68, 71-73]. We repeated the H2S adsorption experiment several times and always observed the band at 1557-1575 cm–1 in the FTIR spectra of H2S-treated aluminas at 20 ℃. The band decreases in intensity or disappears with increasing temperature. The band at 1550-1568 cm–1 accompanied by 1341, 1625, 2556, and 3400 cm–1 bands was observed early in the spectra of γ-Al2O3 [73], MoS2/γ-Al2O3 [73], and Cu-ZSM-5 [75] exposed to H2S at room temperature. Dalla Lana et al. [71] reported bands at 1330 and 1568 cm–1 in the spectra of γ-Al2O3 pretreated with H2S or SO2 and heated at 400 °С. The FTIR spectra of oxidized and reduced aluminas exhibited bands at 2560, 1568, and 1345 cm–1 after alumina treatment by H2S [69]. Bands at 1330 and 1565 cm–1 were assigned in [69, 71] to the S-O vibration of chemisorbed sulfur atoms, which formed SO2-like species with oxide ions of the alumina lattice. Slager and Amberg [73] assigned a band at 1568-1575 cm–1 to Al-O vibrations, whose frequency changed upon adsorption of different molecules (H2S, CO, HCOOH, and C2H6). Saur et al. criticized both points of view [68] in assigning the 1570 cm–1 band to a carbonate mode [76]. It should be noted that the FTIR spectra in [76] did not display a 1570 cm–1 band for CO2-treated alumina, but did show this feature after H2S adsorption on CO2-treated alumina. Despite disagreement as to the origin of the 1565-1575 cm–1 band, most authors have reached the conclusion [68-76] that surface structures with a coordination bond between Al and S are formed during treatment of alumina with H2S, CH3SH, and (CH3)2S. Saur et al. [68, 76] have suggested that strong and weak Lewis acid-base couples can break the H-S bond in H2S and that dissociative adsorption of H2S on the former and latter leads to formation of Al-S and O-H bonds. The reactivity of weak Lewis acid-base couples predominates [68] when the adsorbate has acid properties. Thus, the bands at 1330-1333, 1557-1575, and 2555-2588 cm–1 are assigned to H-bonded and chemisorbed H2S.

Fig. 11. FTIR spectra of alumina samples evacuated at 400 ℃ (1) and interacted with hydrogen sulfide at: 20 ℃ (2), 100 ℃ (3), 200 ℃ (4), 300 ℃ (5), evacuation (6) to 10–3 torr at 20 ℃ after 2–5 steps of H2S adsorption.
Table 4
FTIR experiment data for the different samples of aluminas treated by H2S and heated.

In addition to the features at 1330, 1557, and 2550 cm–1, the spectrum of H2S-treated γ-Al2O3 at 20 ℃ shows absorption bands at 1120, 1180, 1262, and 1350 cm–1. These bands correspond to the vibrations of sulfite/sulfate surface complexes and indicate that partial oxidation of H2S adsorbed on γ-Al2O3 occurs at temperatures as low as 20 ℃. The absorption bands at 1120 and 1350 cm–1 are attributed to the symmetric and antisymmetric vibrations of bonds in a multicentered sulfate-containing structure (AlO)3SO [20, 55, 64, 70, 77]. The bands at 1180 and 1260 cm–1 are attributed to the symmetric and antisymmetric vibrations of bridging surface sulfur atoms within (AlO)2SO2 centers [55, 70, 77] that contain free SO2 unperturbed by hydrogen bonds. Other aluminas do not show bands at 1120/1350 and 1180/1262 cm–1 in their FTIR spectra after H2S adsorption. Monomeric bi-and tridentate sulfates (1120/1350 cm–1) form on the surface of χ-modified aluminas after heating at 200-300 ℃, whereas inorganic bridging sulfate (1180/1262 cm–1) is not observed even after thermal treatment at 300 ℃.

As the H2S-treated aluminas were heated at 100 ℃, the 1332 and 1557 cm–1 bands vanished from the spectra of γ-Al2O3 and α-Al2O3, whereas these bands did not disappear completely in the case of χ-modified samples. For example, the 1332 cm–1 band diminished in intensity by a factor of 10 after heating H2S-treated (γ+35%χ)-Al2O3 and MgO/(γ+15%χ)-Al2O3 at 100 ℃, but the band was still observed in the spectra of these samples after heating at 300 ℃. The disappearance or decrease in intensity of the 1332 and 1557 cm–1 bands may indicate the oxidation of physically adsorbed hydrogen sulfide and formation of sulfur and water via the reaction, H2S + [O] → Sn + H2O. As discussed below, water was found in the FTIR spectra (as a band at 1650 cm–1 [71]) of g-Al2O3 and χ-modified samples after heating at 300 and 100 ℃, respectively.

The intensity of the bands at 1350 and 1262 cm–1 become more intense in the spectrum of H2S-treated γ-Al2O3 after heating at 200 ℃. The bands become stronger at higher temperatures indicating an increase in the amount of multicentered and bidentate sulfate species, respectively. We have identified two new pairs of bands in these spectra. The first pair at 1160-1170 and 1315-1320 cm–1 is characterized by asymmetric band shapes. Their frequencies are assigned to symmetric and asymmetric stretching vibrations of a second type of bridging sulfur [77]. The second pair is located at 1232 and 1430-1445 cm–1. Bensitel and co-authors [78] suggested that bands with ν(S=O) ≥ 1400 cm–1 are typical of a polynuclear sulfate complex such as S2O72–. The FTIR spectrum of sulfated zirconia is characterized by a band at 1400-1405 cm–1 at high sulfate loading [78]. However, the spectrum of SO2 adsorbed on alumina was found by Bensitel et al. [79] to display ν(S=O) near 1390 cm–1. Polymeric sulfate species, which are characterized by absorptions at 1538 and 1488 cm–1, were found by Mekhemer [64] in alumina containing 10 wt% sulfate. We assume that polynuclear sulfate complexes exhibit characteristic absorption bands at 1405-1445 and 1230-1237 cm–1 and that their formation is possible during heating of alumina with adsorbed hydrogen sulfide at 200 ℃.

Polynuclear sulfate complexes characterized by bands at 1230 and 1405-1450 cm–1 were observed on heating χ-modified aluminas at a lower temperature (100 ℃) than γ-Al2O3 (200 ℃). The polynuclear sulfate content in α-Al2O3 was smaller than that in other crystal modifications of alumina. This may be due to differences in the exposed crystal facets of the γ-Al2O3 and χ-Al2O3 structures, which influence the adsorption/desorption pathways of H2S. Morterra et al. [82] showed in sulfated zirconia that species with ν(S=O) equal to 1350-1375 cm-1 are localized at crystallographic defects (edges), whereas those with ν(S=O) at 1380-1400 cm–1 are located mainly on regular patches of low-index crystal planes. This result can be extended to aluminas. γ-Al2O3 is known [45-47] to contain tetrahedrally coordinated Al3+ at crystallographic defect sites as well as octahedrally coordinated Al3+ ions at regular defects on low-index crystal faces. Based on FTIR data, these tetrahedral and octahedral Al3+ configurations are LAS, which are characterized by high-(2210-2240 cm–1) and low-frequency (2180-2205 cm–1) bands, respectively, in the spectra of CO adsorbed on alumina [38, 40-45]. According to Table 3, tetrahedrally coordinated Al3+ ions belong to γ-Al2O3, while octahedrally coordinated Al3+ predominates in both γ-Al2O3 and samples modified with 15-35 wt% χ-Al2O3. Thus, formation of polynuclear sulfate species (1405-1445 cm–1) during heating of H2S-treated aluminas is promoted by weak LAS, which are octahedrally coordinated Al3+ ions.

A further increase in temperature to 300 ℃ did not result in significant changes in sulfur-containing species in H2S-treated aluminas. There are different types of isolated sulfate groups and polynuclear sulfate complexes as well as tridentate surface SOx compounds (1160-1180/1350 cm–1). A greater polynuclear sulfate content (1230/1445 cm–1) is observed at higher heating temperatures. The spectrum of (γ+35%χ)-Al2O3 is characterized by an unstructured absorption in the low frequency region (1100-1200 cm–1), which is associated with the vibration of surface sulfate complexes.

The spectra of H2S-treated γ-Al2O3 samples evacuated at room temperature illustrate the behavior of bands connected with sulfate groups and water. The results show that the sulfate complexes formed over H2S-treated aluminas during heating at 100–300 ℃ are stable. A broadening of the vibrational frequencies of SOx surface compounds (1159 cm–1) and inorganic sulfate complexes (1170 and 1260 cm–1) in the a-Al2O3 spectrum can be caused by water adsorption that accompanies a decrease in temperature.

We conclude that physically adsorbed hydrogen sulfide is oxidized on alumina surfaces to stable surface sulfate groups including multicentered SOx compounds (bands at 1120/1350 cm–1), isolated inorganic sulfates (1180/1260 and 1160/1314 cm–1), and polynuclear sulfates (1230-1237/1405-1445 cm–1) at elevated temperatures (> 100 ℃). In contrast to the χ-modified samples, oxidation of hydrogen sulfide over γ-Al2O3 involving formation of surface SOx compounds begins at room temperature. Physically adsorbed SO2 has been postulated by Prette [80] and Steijns [81] to be an intermediate in H2S oxidation on γ-Al2O3 at 100 ℃. Moreover, H2S oxidation to adsorbed SO2 proceeds slowly on γ-Al2O3 even when H2S is oxidized by molecular oxygen. Although further recovery of adsorbed SO2 with H2S is rapid, the products are elemental sulfur and water. Water forms preferentially at 300 ℃.

H2S oxidation on γ-Al2O3 and α-Al2O3 results in two types of isolated inorganic sulfates with different bridging structures, which can be assigned to intermediate and weak strength LAS on the alumina surface. For 15%-35% χ-containing samples, H2S adsorption leads to formation of a single type of inorganic bridging sulfate probably due to weak LAS. The χ-modified samples are more active, because polynuclear sulfates form on their surface at only 100 ℃, and the intensity of absorption bands is greater than is true for γ-Al2O3 and α-Al2O3. The presence of polynuclear surface sulfates also was detected by DTA as a mass loss at 920-960 ℃ in the TG/DTG curves of spent (γ+35%χ)-Al2O3 tested for H2S oxidation at 300 ℃ for 50 h (Fig. 12(a)). Polynuclear surface sulfates were found by Yang [63] to decompose at 950 ℃ unlike crystallized aluminum sulfate (800-860 ℃) and multilayer sulfate (630 ℃). The latter species are typical of (γ+15%χ)-Al2O3 modified by 10 wt% sulfate (Fig. 12(b)). Surface sulfates are characterized by a wide peak near 950 ℃, which broadens at lower temperatures. It is due to different interactions between polynuclear sulfate and the alumina surface.

Fig. 12. TG (1), DTA (2) and DTG (3) curves in air for the spent sample (γ+35%χ)-Al2O3 after stability test at 300 ℃ during 50 h (a) and the initial sample 10% SO4/(γ+15%χ)-Al2O3 (b).
4 Conclusions

The phase composition of alumina samples (α, γ, and (γ+χ)-Al2O3) strongly influences their activity in hydrogen sulfide oxidation. The catalytic activity of γ-Al2O3, including samples modified with Mg2+, increases in the presence of χ-Al2O3.

The acidic properties of α-Al2O3, γ-Al2O3, and (γ+χ)-Al2O3 surfaces were studied by FTIR spectroscopy with CO adsorption and NH3-TPD. For α-and γ-Al2O3 samples, FTIR spectra reveal the presence of weak and intermediate strength LAS with CO vibrational frequencies greater than 2186 and 2200 cm–1, respectively. Only weak LAS characterized by an absorption band at 2186-2200 cm–1 are found on (γ+χ)-Al2O3. Introduction of MgO into (γ+15%χ)-Al2O3 reduces the strength of the weak LAS, as observed by a band shift from 2186 to 2181 cm–1, but significantly increases their number.

Interaction of hydrogen sulfide with α, γ, and γ+χ crystal modifications of Al2O3 at 100–400 ℃ results in the appearance of surface SOx compounds (1120/1350 cm–1 absorption bands), inorganic sulfates (1160-1180 and 1260-1314 cm–1 bands), and polynuclear sulfates (1230-1237 and 1400-1445 cm–1 bands). For α-Al2O3 and γ-Al2O3, which possess weak and intermediate LAS, additional inorganic sulfate species with high frequency bands at 1265 and 1300-1315 cm–1 are observed.

Based on data from FTIR spectroscopy and a comparison of the catalytic activity and selectivity of alumina samples, we suggest that hydrogen sulfide is adsorbed predominantly on weak LAS. Alumina samples containing χ-phase Al2O3 and/or modified with Mg2+ are characterized by a large concentration of weak LAS and exhibit enhanced catalytic activity in H2S oxidation. When alumina is treated with a solution of sulfuric acid, strong LAS appear and the LAS population decreases significantly. Modification of alumina with hydrochloric acid has a limited effect on LAS strength. Weak LAS are retained and double in number relative to unmodified material, but the chloride-treated sample has Al-Cl rather than Al-O(OH) bonds. Alumina samples modified by sulfate and chloride anions exhibit poor catalytic activity in hydrogen sulfide oxidation.

Acknowledgment

This work was conducted within the framework of Program of the Russian Academy of Sciences and the Federal Agency for Scientific Organizations (state-guaranteed order for BIC, Project АААА-А17-117041710086-6).

The authors are grateful to T. Ya. Efimenko for the aid with estimation of adsorption characteristics, V.A. Ushakov for investigation of aluminas by XRD, and G.S.Livak for DTA-TG experiments.

References
[1] A. Melchor, E. Garbowski, M. V. Mathieu, M. Primet, J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 1, 1986, 82: 1893–1901. DOI:10.1039/f19868201893
[2] F. Arena, F. Frusterl, N. Mondeller, N. Giordano, A. Parmaliana, J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans, 1992, 88: 3353–3356. DOI:10.1039/FT9928803353
[3] B. Ducourty, G. Szabo, J. P. Dath, J. P. Gilson, J. M. Goupil, D. Cornet, Appl. Catal. A, 2004, 269: 203–214. DOI:10.1016/j.apcata.2004.04.019
[4] G. Clet, J. M. Goupil, G. Szabo, D. Cornet, J. Mol. Catal. A, 1999, 148: 253–264. DOI:10.1016/S1381-1169(99)00158-2
[5] G. Clet, J. M. Goupil, G. Szabo, D. Cornet, Appl. Catal. A, 2000, 202: 37–46. DOI:10.1016/S0926-860X(00)00452-X
[6] R. S. Drago, E. E. Getty, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1988, 110: 3311–3312. DOI:10.1021/ja00218a057
[7] J. Thomson, G. Webb, J. M. Winfield, J. Mol. Catal., 1991, 68: 347–354. DOI:10.1016/0304-5102(91)80092-H
[8] S. V. Tsybulya, G. N. Kryukova, Physical Review B, 2008, 77: 024112. DOI:10.1103/PhysRevB.77.024112
[9] S. A. Yashnik, A. V. Ishchenko, L. S. Dovlitova, Z. R. Ismagilov, Top. Catal., 2017, 60: 52–72. DOI:10.1007/s11244-016-0722-8
[10] Z. R. Ismagilov, M. A. Kerzhentsev, Catal. Rev. Sci. Eng., 1990, 32: 51–102. DOI:10.1080/01614949009349940
[11] Z. R. Ismagilov, N. M. Dobrynkin, S. R. Khairulin, F. R. Ismagilov, Oil & Gas J., 1994, 7: 81–82.
[12] B. W. Gamson, R. H. Elkins, Chem. Eng. Progr., 1953, 49: 203–215.
[13] J. Klein, K. D. Henning, Fuel, 1984, 63: 1064–1067. DOI:10.1016/0016-2361(84)90189-3
[14] Z. L. Pan, H. S. Weng, H. Y. Feng, J. M. Smith, AIChE J., 1984, 30: 1021–1025. DOI:10.1002/(ISSN)1547-5905
[15] A. B. Verver, W. P. M. Van Swaaij, Appl. Catal., 1985, 14: 185–206. DOI:10.1016/S0166-9834(00)84354-7
[16] R. J. A. M. Terorde, P. J. Van den Brink, L. M. Visser, A. J. van Dillen, J. W. Geus, Catal. Today, 1993, 17: 217–224. DOI:10.1016/0920-5861(93)80026-W
[17] V. I. Marshneva, V. V. Mokrinskii, Kinet. Catal., 1988, 29: 989–993.
[18] M. V. Batygina, N. M. Dobrynkin, O. A. Kirichenko, S. R. Khairulin, Z. R. Ismagilov, React. Kinet. Catal. Lett., 1992, 48: 55–63. DOI:10.1007/BF02070067
[19] K. T. Li, C. S. Yen, N. S. Shyu, Appl. Catal. A, 1997, 156: 117–123. DOI:10.1016/S0926-860X(96)00417-6
[20] Z. R. Ismagilov, M. A. Kerzhentsev, S. R. Khairulin, V. V. Kuznetsov, Chem. Sustainable Development, 1999, 7: 375–381.
[21] J. H. Uhm, M. Y. Shin, J. Zhidong, J. S. Chung, Appl. Catal. B, 1999, 22: 293–303. DOI:10.1016/S0926-3373(99)00057-0
[22] E. Laperdrix, G. Costentin, O. Saur, J. C. Lavalley, C. Nedez, S. Savin-Pocet, J. Nougayrede, J. Catal., 2000, 189: 63–69. DOI:10.1006/jcat.1999.2691
[23] N. Keller, C. Pham-Huu, M. J. Ledoux, Appl. Catal. A, 2001, 217: 205–217. DOI:10.1016/S0926-860X(01)00601-9
[24] S. Yasyerlia, G. Dogua, I. Ara, T. Dogu, Chem. Eng. Sci., 2004, 59: 4001–4009. DOI:10.1016/j.ces.2004.03.045
[25] P. Nguyen, D. Edouard, J. M. Nhut, M. J. Ledoux, C. Pham, C. Pham-Huu, Appl. Catal. B, 2007, 76: 300–310. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2007.06.007
[26] M. D. Soriano, J. Jimenez-Jimenez, P. Concepcion, A. Jimenez-Lopez, E. Rodrıguez-Castellon, J. M. Lopez Nieto, Appl. Catal. B, 2009, 92: 271–279. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2009.08.002
[27] M. Leon, J. Jimenez-Jimenez, A. Jimenez-Lopez, E. Rodrıguez-Castellon, D. Soriano, J. M. Lopez Nieto, Solid State Sci., 2010, 12: 996–1001. DOI:10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2009.08.009
[28] V. Palma, D. Barba, P. Ciambelli, Chem. Eng. Trans., 2012, 29: 631–636.
[29] X. Zhang, G. Y. Dou, Z. Wang, L. Li, Y. F. Wang, H. L. Wang, Z. P. Hao, J. Hazard. Mater., 2013, 260: 104–111. DOI:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.05.008
[30] A. Reyes-Carmona, D. Soriano, J. M. Lopez Nieto, D. J. Jones, J. Jimenez-Jimenez, A. Jimenez-Lopez, E. Rodriguez-Castellon, Catal. Today, 2013, 210: 117–123. DOI:10.1016/j.cattod.2012.11.016
[31] V. Palma, D. Barba, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2014, 39: 21524–21530. DOI:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.09.120
[32] M. D. Soriano, J. A. Cecilia, A. Natoli, J. Jimenez, - Jimenez, J. M. Lopez Nieto, E. Rodriguez, - Castellon, Catal. Today, 2015, 254: 36–42. DOI:10.1016/j.cattod.2014.12.022
[33] N. A. Koryabkina, Z. R. Ismagilov, R. A. Shkrabina, E. M. Moroz, V. A. Ushakov, Appl. Catal., 1991, 72: 63–69. DOI:10.1016/0166-9834(91)85028-T
[34] P. H. Berben, A. Scholten, M. K. Titulaer, N. Brahma, W. J. J. van der Wal, J. W. Geus, Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal., 1987, 34: 303–316. DOI:10.1016/S0167-2991(09)60369-4
[35] P. J. Van den Brink, Study of the reaction of hydrogen sulfide oxidation on vanadia catalysts, Ph. D Thesis, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands, 1992.
[36] M. N. Shepeleva, R. A. Shkrabina, Z. R. Ismagilov, Technol. Today, 1990, 3: 150–162.
[37] Z. R. Ismagilov, R. A. Shkrabina, N. A. Koryabkina, Catal. Today, 1999, 47: 51–71. DOI:10.1016/S0920-5861(98)00283-1
[38] E. Paukshtis, R. I. Soltanov, E. N. Yurchenko, React. Kinet. Catal. Lett., 1981, 16: 93–96. DOI:10.1007/BF02077036
[39] R. I. Soltanov, E. A. Paukshtis, E. N. Yurchenko, Kinet. Catal., 1982, 23: 135–141.
[40] E. A. Paukshtis, Infrared Spectroscopy of Heterogeneous Acid-Base Catalysis (in Russian), 1992, Nauka, Novosibirsk.
[41] E. Paukshtis, P. I. Soltanov, E. N. Yurchenko, K. Iratova, Collection Czechoslovak Chem. Commun., 1982, 47: 2044–2060. DOI:10.1135/cccc19822044
[42] E. Baumgarten, R. Wagner, C. Lentes-Wagner, Fresenius Z. Anal. Chem., 1989, 334: 246–251. DOI:10.1007/BF00497251
[43] G. Della Gatta, B. Fubini, G. Ghiotti, C. Morterra, J. Catal., 1976, 43: 90–98. DOI:10.1016/0021-9517(76)90296-7
[44] A. Zecchina, E. Escalona Platero, C. Otero Arean, J. Catal., 1987, 107: 244–247. DOI:10.1016/0021-9517(87)90290-9
[45] G. Busca, V. Lorenzelli, V. Sanchez Escribano, R. Guidetti, J. Catal., 1991, 131: 167–177. DOI:10.1016/0021-9517(91)90333-Y
[46] H. Knözinger, P. Ratnasamy, Catal. Rev. Sci. Eng., 1978, 17: 31–70. DOI:10.1080/03602457808080878
[47] M. Digne, P. Sautet, P. Raybaud, P. Euzen, H. Toulhoat, J. Catal., 2002, 211: 1–5. DOI:10.1016/S0021-9517(02)93741-3
[48] E. V. Kul'ko, A. S. Ivanova, A. A. Budneva, E. A. Paukshtis, Kinet. Catal., 2005, 46: 132–137. DOI:10.1007/s10975-005-0020-0
[49] T. Montanari, L. Castoldi, L. Lietti, G Busca, Appl. Catal. A, 2011, 400: 61–69. DOI:10.1016/j.apcata.2011.04.016
[50] V. V. Yuschenko, Russian Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 1997, 71: 628–632.
[51] R. H. Perry, D. W. Green, J. O. Malonay (Eds. ), Perry's Chemical Engineering Handbook, 7th Edition, McGraw-Hill Companies, New York, 1997, pp. 2-7.
[52] M. Yu, . Smirnova, G. A. Urguntsev, A. B. Ayupov, A. A. Vedyagin, G. V. Echevsky, Appl. Catal. A, 2008, 344: 107–113. DOI:10.1016/j.apcata.2008.04.004
[53] S. A. Yashnik, Z. R. Ismagilov, I. V. Koptyug, I. P. Andrievskaya, A. A. Matveev, J. A. Moulijn, Catal. Today, 2005, 105: 507–515. DOI:10.1016/j.cattod.2005.06.055
[54] S. A. Yashnik, I. P. Andrievskaya, O. V. Pashke, Z. R. Ismagilov, J. A. Moulijn, Catal. Ind., 2007, 1: 35–46.
[55] O. Saur, M. Bensitel, A. B. M. Saad, J. C. Lavalley, C. P. Tripp, B. A. Morrowt, J. Catal., 1986, 99: 104–110. DOI:10.1016/0021-9517(86)90203-4
[56] V. V. Danilevich, L. A. Isupova, E. A. Paukshtis, V. A. Ushakov, Kinet. Catal., 2014, 55(3): 372–379. DOI:10.1134/S0023158414030021
[57] G. C. Bond, Heterogeneous Catalysis, Principles and Applications,[M]. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford Science publications, 1987: 140
[58] C. N. Satterfield, Mass Transfer in Heterogeneous Catalysis[M]. Cambridge: M. I. T Press, 1970: 267
[59] A. Wheeler, Adv. Catal., 1951, 3: 249–327.
[60] M. Steijns, P. Mars, Ind. Chem. Prod. Res. Dev., 1977, 16: 35–39. DOI:10.1021/i360061a006
[61] M. Steijns, P. Kooprian, B. Nieuwenhuijse, P. Mars, J. Catal., 1976, 42: 96–106. DOI:10.1016/0021-9517(76)90095-6
[62] A. V. Mashkina, Heterogeneous Catalysis in Chemistry of Organic Sulfur Compounds, Novosibirsk, Nayka, 1977, 237.
[63] T. S. Yang, T. H. Chang, C. T. Yeh, J. Mol. Catal. A, 1997, 115: 339–347. DOI:10.1016/S1381-1169(96)00283-X
[64] G. A. H. Mekhemer, M. I. Zaki, Surf. Sci., 2016, 652: 269–277. DOI:10.1016/j.susc.2016.03.006
[65] T. V. Reshetenko, S. R. Khairulin, Z. R. Ismagilov, V. V. Kuznetsov, Intern. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2002, 27: 387–394. DOI:10.1016/S0360-3199(01)00143-4
[66] A. V. Mashkina, E. A. Paukshtis, V. N. Yakovleva, Kinet. Catal., 1988, 29: 596–603.
[67] I. V. Desyatov, E. A. Paukshtis, A. V. Mashkina, React. Kinet. Catal. Lett., 1990, 41: 161–165. DOI:10.1007/BF02075498
[68] O. Saur, T. Chevreau, J. Lamotte, J. Travert, J. C. Lavalley, J. Chem. Soc.,Faraday Trans. 1, 1981, 77: 427–437. DOI:10.1039/f19817700427
[69] C. L. Liu, T. T. Chuang, I. G. Dalla Lana, J. Catal., 1972, 26: 474–482. DOI:10.1016/0021-9517(72)90111-X
[70] E. Laperdrix, A. Sahibed-dine, G. Costentin, O. Saur, M. Bensitel, C. Nedez, A. B. Mohamed Saad, J.C. Lavalley, Appl. Catal. B, 2000, 26: 71–80. DOI:10.1016/S0926-3373(00)00108-9
[71] A. V. Deo, I. G. Dalla Lana, H. W. Habgood, J. Catal., 1971, 21: 270–281. DOI:10.1016/0021-9517(71)90146-1
[72] G. Herzberg, Infrared and Raman spectra of polyatomic molecules,[M]. Princeton, New Jersey: D. Nostrand Co. Inc., 1959: 283
[73] T. L. Slager, C. H. Amberg, Can. J. Chem., 1972, 50: 3416–3423. DOI:10.1139/v72-552
[74] C. L. Garcia, J. A. Lercher, J. Phys. Chem., 1992, 96: 2230–2235. DOI:10.1021/j100184a038
[75] M. Ziolek, I. Sobczak, I. Nowak, M. Daturi, J. C. Lavalley, Appl. Catal. B, 2000, 28: 197–207. DOI:10.1016/S0926-3373(00)00177-6
[76] J. C. Lavalley, J. Travert, T. Chevreau, J. Lamotte, O. Saur, J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun., 1979: 147–148.
[77] T. Yamaguchi, T. Jin, K. Tanabe, J. Phys. Chem., 1986, 90: 3148–3152. DOI:10.1021/j100405a022
[78] M. Bensitel, O. Saur, J. C. Lavalley, B. A. Morrow, Mater. Chem. Phys., 1988, 19: 147–156. DOI:10.1016/0254-0584(88)90007-7
[79] Z. M. George, M. Bensitel, M. Lion, O. Saur, J. C. Lavalley, Appl. Catal., 1988, 43: 167–176. DOI:10.1016/S0166-9834(00)80909-4
[80] M. Prettre, R. Sion, Z. Elektrochem., 1959, 63: 100–105.
[81] M. Steijns, F. Derks, A. Verloop, P. Mars, J. Catal., 1976, 42: 87–95. DOI:10.1016/0021-9517(76)90094-4
[82] C. Morterra, G. Cerrato, V. Bolis, Catal. Today, 1993, 17: 505–515. DOI:10.1016/0920-5861(93)80053-4