Platinum nanoparticles (NPs) are key electrocatalysts that are used in industrial processes and commercial devices, particularly for direct methanol fuel cells (DMFCs), which are used as sustainable replacements for traditional fossil fuels [1-5]. DMFCs have unique physical and chemical properties as well as the ability to facilitate both oxidation and reduction reactions [6, 7]. However, there are two major drawbacks of these catalysts: Pt is expensive and scarce, and Pt NPs are easily contaminated by the carbon monoxide (CO) that is generated as an intermediate species during methanol oxidation reactions (MORs) [8, 9]. Therefore, it is necessary to improve catalytic performance while conserving Pt.
One way of overcoming these problems is to prepare Pt NPs with high active specific surface areas. By downsizing NPs, a high surface-to-volume ratio is achieved, thus, enhancing the rate of efficiency at which the catalysts utilize metals [10]. Also, adjusting specific facets, edges, corners, and defects of NPs so that they can provide more active reaction sites to optimize the catalytic properties [11, 12]. Another major strategy for improving the catalytic activity of NPs is to combine Pt with another metallic element into bimetallic alloys. Recently, there have been reports on bimetallic Pt-M (M = Pd, Au, Ag, Ru, Fe, Co, Ni, etc.) catalysts with increased electrocatalytic activity that also minimize the consumption of Pt [14-20]. For example, the DMFC performance increased in the order of Pt/C < Pt-Fe/C < Pt-Co/C ≈ Pt-Cr/C [20].
Due to its proximity to Pt in the periodic table, Pd is considered a prime candidate for building platinum and palladium (PtPd) bimetallic catalysts, which are less expensive than pure Pt catalysts and exhibit excellent catalytic performance [21, 22]. Recent studies have indicated that PtPd alloy NPs may be useful as catalysts for the hydrogenation of aromatic hydrocarbons and for the electro-oxidation of small organic molecules (methanol, ethanol, etc.) with high sulfur [23] and CO tolerance [24] due to the bifunctional effect of NPs. In addition, the use of Pd instead of other metals such as Cu, Ag, Co, or Ni could also help minimize corrosion and loss of catalysts when said catalysts are used in an acidic environment such as proton-exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cells [25].
Over the past decade, many Pt-Pd bimetallic NPs with a rich variety of structures and shapes, such as core-shell structures, nanocages, and tetrahedra have been prepared [26-28]. Many methods for preparing bimetallic NPs have been developed, such as: co-chemical reduction, seed-mediated growth, electrochemical deposition, and galvanic replacement [29-32]. However, PtPd NPs synthesized from these methods lack either size or composition tunability over a wide range and are generally not suitable for composition-dependent catalytic studies.
In this study, ultrasmall PtPd alloy NPs with controls on sizes (4.0-7.0 nm) and compositions were developed. Monodisperse PtPd NPs were prepared via the co-reduction of K2PtCl4 and Na2PdCl4 with Poly (vinyl pyrrolidone) (PVP) in ethylene glycol (EG) solution. The PtPd NPs were active catalysts for MORs in an H2SO4 solution, and their activity was composition dependent. The PtPd alloy NPs with atomic Pt in 75% showed higher activity and durability than commercial Pt/C catalyst, and its mass specific activity was 7 times greater than that of commercial Pt/C catalysts. This study indicate that through the composition control, these PtPd alloy NPs can serve as an excellent platform for studying catalysis optimization.
Potassium tetrachloroplatinate (Ⅱ) (K2PtCl4, AR), sodium tetrachloropalladate (Na2PdCl4, AR), ethylene glycol (EG, AR), and acetone and poly (vinyl pyrrolidone) (PVP, Mw = 55, 000) were purchased from Aladdin (Shanghai, China). Vulcan XC-72R was received from Cabot (Boston, MA, USA) and 5% Nafion was purchased from Sigma (Shanghai, China). All reagents were used without further purification. High-purity deionized water (> 18.4 MΩ∙cm) was produced using Millipore A10 Milli-Q (Darmstadt, Germany).
PtPd alloy NPs were synthesized using a polyol method, in which Na2PdCl4 and K2PtCl4 served as the metal precursors, while PVP and EG served as a stabilizer and strong reductant, respectively. PVP was also used as a weak reductant due to its hydroxy (OH) end groups [33]. The process of synthesizing uniform PtPd alloy NPs is shown in Scheme 1. PVP (105 mg) was dissolved in EG (8 mL) and heated to 110 ℃ in air under magnetic stirring. Meanwhile, Na2PdCl4 (28.5 mg, 0.1 mmol) and K2PtCl4 (40.4 mg, 0.1 mmol) were co-dissolved in EG (3 mL) at room temperature. The EG solution of K2PtCl4 and Na2PdCl4 was then added dropwise to the PVP solution. The reaction mixture was heated at 110 ℃ in air for 5 h. After the mixture had cooled to room temperature, the PtPd NPs were centrifuged (13500 r/min, 30 min) and washed three times with acetone to remove excess PVP and EG. The products were dispersed and preserved in ethanol. Finally, the as-prepared solution of PtPd NPs was dried in a vacuum oven at 70 ℃ for 8 h. The Pt/Pd atomic ratio was controlled by the Pt and Pd precursor ratios. The Pt1Pd3, Pt1Pd1 and Pt3Pd1 NPs were synthesized by using K2PtCl4 and Na2PdCl4 of 0.3 mmol/0.1 mmol, 0.1 mmol/0.1mmol, and 0.1mmol/0.3 mmol, respectively.
Two milligrams of PtPd NPs in acetone were mixed with 10 mg of carbon black (Vulcan XC-72R) and sonicated for 1 h to load all the NPs on carbon black. The PtPd/Vulcan XC-72R was separated by centrifugation (13500 r/min, 10 min) and further purified twice by deionized water and dried in a vacuum oven at 70 ℃ for 8 h. Finally, the PtPd/C was suspended in ethanol by sonication to form a PtPd/ Vulcan XC-72R suspension (2 mg/mL). The commercial Pt/C (E-TEK, 30% Pt loading) was used without any treatment and was sonicated with ethanol to form a commercial Pt/C catalyst suspension (2 mg/mL).
All the electrochemical characterizations were carried out using a workstation (CHI660D, Chen Hua, Shanghai, China) and a three-electrode configuration with a glassy carbon (GC) electrode, a saturated calomel electrode (SCE), and a platinum foil as the working electrode, reference electrode and counter electrode, respectively. Prior to use, the GCE was carefully polished with alumina paste for 30 s, thoroughly cleaned, and air-dried. For cyclic voltammogram (CV) measurements, 20 μL of a catalyst dispersion was dropped onto the GC electrode and dried at room temperature. After solvent evaporation, 10 μL of 0.05 wt% Nafion solution were dropped onto the surface of the GCE and air-dried. Cyclic voltammetry was first conducted at 50 mV/s in 0.5 mol/L H2SO4 solution within the potential range −0.25 to 1.0 V (vs SCE). Before data collection, each catalyst modified electrode was cleaned and activated in the electrolyte solution for several cycles to ensure that a stable CV was obtained. The CVs were used to estimate the electrochemical active surface area (ECASA) of the catalyst by calculating the hydrogen under potential desorption (Hupd) area of the catalyst. MOR measurements of the catalysts were conducted in a solution containing 0.5 mol/L H2SO4 and 0.5 mol/L CH3OH at a scan rate of 50 mV/s within the potential range 0 to 1.0 V. Chronoamperometric (CA) curves were generated at 0.6 V in a solution containing 0.5 mol/L H2SO4 and 0.5 mol/L CH3OH for 1000 s to test the stabilities of various catalysts. The system was deaerated with N2 before the voltammetric behavior was monitored.
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of the PtPd NPs were obtained using a Tecnai G2F20 microscope operating at an accelerating voltage of 200 kV. High-resolution TEM (HRTEM) images were captured using a Titan G2 60-300 with an image corrector (point resolution = 80 pm) operating at an accelerating voltage of 300 kV. The samples for TEM and HRTEM were prepared by dropping the ethanol suspensions of the products on copper grids coated with amorphous carbon film. The structures of as-prepared products were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD) (Rigaku D/Max 2550 X, Cu Kα radiation, λ = 0.154178 nm, Tokyo, Japan). The composition of PtPd/Vulcan XC-72R was determined by energy dispersive X-Ray spectroscopy (EDS, Quanta FEG250, 20 kV, FEI Company, Hillsboro, OR, USA).
The reaction was conducted at a high rate of co-reduction by using EG as a reducing agent (i.e., the so-called polyol synthesis), with the feed molar ratio of K2PtCl4 to Na2PdCl4 kept at 1:1. TEM and HRTEM images of the typical product are shown in Fig. 1(a) and (b). The TEM studies and a size histogram of PtPd NPs were obtained by counting 100 particles in Fig. 1(d). The results revealed that these products had a nearly octahedral profile and a narrow size distribution with a mean diameter of about 4 nm. As-prepared monodisperse and uniform products depend critically on the reduction rate of the metal precursor. The synthesis process utilized EG as the reductant. The process of heating EG in air can generate GA (glycolaldehyde), a reductant that is stronger than EG [34]:
In polyol syntheses for noble metals, GA can be used as the primary reductant when the reaction temperature is within the range of 140 to 160 ℃. But EG as a reductant itself becomes more significant when synthesis is conducted at a lower temperature. This difference in the reductant at different reaction temperatures is vital because the preparation of Pt and Pd nanocrystals is usually carried out at lower temperatures. In practice, Pt and Pd precursors have proven to be more easily reduced, and it is unsurprising that EG itself is sufficient [35, 36]. During synthesis, the reduction of Pd and Pt by EG at 70 ℃ resulted in the rapid generation of metal atoms and seeds that were greater in number in the product. At the same concentration of a precursor, the presence of more seeds means smaller sizes of the final products. In Fig. 1(c), a fast Fourier transform (FFT) pattern of as-prepared PtPd NPs is noted with a red arrow. In Fig. 1(b), the crystal fringe of as-prepared PtPd NPs measured to be ∼0.19 nm, corresponding to the (200) interplanar spacing of the face-centered-cubic (fcc) alloy structure.
EDS analysis was used to determine the compositions of each sample (Fig. S1). The atomic ratio of Pd to Pt was 51.68:48.32, nearly 1:1. The result indicated that the composition of the products was consistent with the feed molar ratio, which is marked as Pt1Pd1.
The mole ratio of precursors is often a major influence on the morphology and structure of the product [37, 38]. In this study, PtPd NPs were prepared in different compositions by adjusting the mole ratio of the precursors (Pt:Pd = 1:3 and 3:1). The TEM images in Fig. 2 indicate that the average nanocrystal size is not strongly influenced by the PtPd molar ratio of the precursors. In both reaction systems, the products were well dispersed and had nearly octahedral nanostructures with mean sizes of approximately 6.72 and 6.39 nm. In addition, both samples were single-crystalline and showed high crystallinity, as confirmed by the corresponding HRTEM pattern. The EDS of the prepared products was analyzed with different feed ratios. In the results (Figs. S2 and S3), the atomic ratios of Pt to Pd in Pt1Pd3 and Pt3Pd1 were determined to be 27.1:72.9 and 74.3: 25.7, respectively, very close to the feed molar ratios. The results can be attributed to the intrinsic physical properties of both Pt and Pd, which are as follows: (1) both possess fcc structures; (2) the difference of atomic radius between each one was 1.4% (the atomic radii of Pd and Pt are 1.37 and 1.39 , respectively); (3) Pd and Pt have nearly similar electronegativities (2.20 and 2.28, on the Pauling electronegativity scale, respectively) [39, 40]; (4) the lattice mismatch of each one is only 0.77%. These similarities enable them to easily form alloys with all compositions [41]. As a zero-order approximation, metal ions with more positive reduction potentials tend to be reduced at a faster rate than those with lower potentials. In general, metal ions with similar reduction potential are relatively easy to combinate to generate alloy NPs via co-reduction. Pt2+/Pt and Pd2+/Pd, which have reduction potentials of +1.18 V and +0.9 (vs SHE), respectively, can be readily co-reduced nearly at the same time to form continuous PtPd alloyed NPs [42].
The XRD was used to characterize the structure of the as-prepared Pd and PtPd NPs, as shown in Fig. 3. All NPs show diffraction peaks corresponding to (111), (200) and (220) of the fcc structure.
The PtPd NPs were further characterized by their composition-dependent electrochemical behaviors. To minimize possible aggregation during the catalytic reaction and utilize the support effect, Vulcan XC-72R was used as the support. Vulcan XC-72R carbon is amorphous and widely used as the support material for the electrodes in DMFCs. 2 mg of PtPd NPs in acetone were mixed with 10 mg of Vulcan XC-72R for 1 h and dried in a vacuum oven. Then the product was suspended in ethanol to form a 2 mg/mL PtPd/Vulcan XC-72R suspension. EDS results (Fig. S4) show that the Pt1Pd3 and Pt3Pd1 NPs loading on Vulcan XC-72R was 10.4% and 16.36%, respectively. As shown in Fig. 4, the CV curves of Pt1Pd3/Vulcan XC-72R and Pt3Pd1/Vulcan XC-72R catalysts in N2-saturated 0.5 mol/L H2SO4 were measured and compared with the curves of the commercial Pt/C catalyst. In the test of CV curves, the potential was scanned with a triangular wave from −0.25 to 1.0 V. In the positive scanning direction, CV curves revealed that there was a large peak between −0.25 and −0.12V, which suggested that the hydrogen experienced potential desorption (Hupd) on the NPs surface. The second peak indicates the formation of a hydroxide layer (OHad) on the NPs surface. In the negative scanning direction, the two peaks can be attributed to NPs surface reduction and hydrogen adsorption, respectively.
The electrochemically active surface area (ECASA) can be calculated from the charge involved in the hydrogen adsorption/desorption processes using the following equations [12, 43].
where M is the loading of nanoparticles on the electrode, and the Qs is the surface charge that can be calculated from the Hupd area under the CV curve, as shown in Fig. S6 by
where ν is the scanning rate (50 mV/s) and, ∫IdE is the shaded area under the CV curve with the double layer current deducted. The ECASA of commercial Pt/C, Pt1Pd3/Vulcan XC-72R and Pt3Pd1/Vulcan XC-72R catalysts were 239.76, 604.85 and 891.76 cm2/mg, respectively. The ECASA of Pt3Pd1/ Vulcan XC-72R was 3.72 times greater than that of the commercial Pt/C catalyst, which indicated that catalytic activity was more efficient than the commercial catalyst.
The electrochemical performance of commercial Pt/C, Pt1Pd3/Vulcan XC-72R and Pt3Pd1/Vulcan XC-72R catalysts was tested for methanol oxidation, which is the heart of DMFC application in the anodic half-cell reaction. The data in Fig. 5 indicate that in the forward scan, methanol oxidation produced an anodic peak at around 0.7 V. The increase in current density was likely due to the greater potential, which aids in the promotion of MOR. Then, the current density dropped as the NP surfaces were oxidized. In the backward scan, an anodic peak appears at around 0.4 V. This anodic peak can be attributed to the removal of the incompletely oxidized carbonaceous species formed in the forward scan. As the oxidized surface was reduced, the catalyst regained its original activity level, leading to a current density jump [44]. We then tabulated the data of the peak potential and peak current density of commercial Pt/C, Pt1Pd3/Vulcan XC-72R and Pt3Pd1/Vulcan XC-72R catalysts for methanol oxidation (Table S1). The statistical results showed that the Pt3Pd1/Vulcan XC-72R catalysts had a lower peak potential and the peak current density was 7 times greater than that of commercial Pt/C catalysts. The mass activities of commercial Pt/C, Pt1Pd3/Vulcan XC-72R, and Pt3Pd1/Vulcan XC-72R catalysts were 0.12, 0.33, and 0.03 mA/cm2, respectively. These results indicated that the catalytic activity of Pt3Pd1/Vulcan XC-72R catalysts increased. The Pt1Pd3/Vulcan XC-72R catalysts have the lowest peak potential, and the peak current density is close to that of the commercial Pt/C catalysts. The ratio of the forward oxidation current peak (If) to the reverse current peak (Ib), If/Ib, denote the catalysts' tolerance to the poisoning species. A higher ratio indicated that a more effective removal rate of the poisoning species on the catalyst surface was taking place. As shown in Table S1, Pt1Pd3/Vulcan XC-72R has an If/Ib ratio of 3.856, higher than that of the commercial Pt/C (1.749), showing better catalyst tolerance. Liner sweep voltammograms (LSV) curves of the commercial Pt/C, Pt1Pd3/Vulcan XC-72R and Pt3Pd1/Vulcan XC-72R catalysts obtained in N2-saturated 0.5 mol/L H2SO4 + 0.5 mol/L CH3OH are presented in Fig. 5(b). The results showed that the peak current for methanol oxidation of PtPd alloyed nanoparticles was higher than that of commercial Pt/C, suggesting highercatalytic activity of PtPd alloyed nanoparticles.
The bifunctional methanol oxidation mechanism can be used to elucidate the different MOR activities of the PtPd NPs with different compositions [45]. Pt is mainly responsible for the methanol dehydrogenation that results in the formation of Pt-CO, while Pd catalyzes the water dehydrogenation reactions to form Pd-OH. The reactions that occur between Pt-CO and Pd-OH produce CO2 and regain the active metal surface. Because of the shortage of Pd, the water dehydrogenation reactions that occur on the surface of Pt would take place at a higher potential, slowing down all oxidation processes on pure platinum surfaces. The catalytic activity also decreases when the amount of Pd is excessive. This can be attributed to a lack of Pt for methanol dehydrogenation, as seen in the MOR catalysis of Pt1Pd3/Vulcan XC-72R catalysts [44].
Pt NPs catalysts are known to deteriorate quickly in the oxidizing acidic environment as demonstrated by the effectiveness of bimetallic NP solutions [46]. To further study the stability of the commercial Pt/C, Pt1Pd3/Vulcan XC-72R, and Pt3Pd1/Vulcan XC-72R catalysts, a chronoamperometry test was conducted in a solution of 0.5 mol/L H2SO4 and 0.5 mol/L CH3OH for 1000 s at a fixed potential of 0.6 V (vs SCE), as shown in Fig. 6(a). The current density was very high in the initial solution because of the double-layer charging and the exposure of numerous available active sites. Then, the current density of all NPs decreased rapidly within a few seconds. Methanol oxidation resulted in the production of CO-like intermediates, such as CO and CHO, which were adsorbed on the surface of active sites to prevent methanol's further oxidation [47]. The current density then maintained a steady state. Throughout the testing period, the current density of Pt3Pd1/Vulcan XC-72R catalysts remained higher than that of commercial Pt/C catalysts. The current density of Pt3Pd1/Vulcan XC-72R catalysts is 5.13 mA/mg at 1000 s, which is much higher than that of commercial Pt/C (0.41 mA/mg at 1000 s). Thus, the chronoamperometric i-t curves indicated that Pt3Pd1/Vulcan XC-72R catalysts were more resistant to poisoning by CO-like intermediates and were more stable. Here, the Pt3Pd1/Vulcan XC-72R was utilized as a typical catalyst for the observation of changes in morphology and composition of the catalysts due to the greater efficiency of its catalytic performance and durability in the MOR tests. Fig. 6(b) shows that the morphology of Pt3Pd1/Vulcan XC-72R remained unchanged after the i-t test for 1000s, as does its composition (Fig. S5).
This study was conducted to investigate a more cost effective and simple way to synthesize the composition-controlled PtPd NPs by adjusting the molar ratio of metal precursors. The strong reductive reactions that occurred during the polyol synthesis process allowed for the size of PtPd NPs to be controlled in a narrow distribution with a mean size of around 4 nm. Three types of PtPd NPs catalysts were synthesized with different compositions, i.e. Pt1Pd3, Pt1Pd1, and Pt3Pd1. These NPs were supported on Vulcan XC-72R to evaluate the electrochemical performance for methanol oxidation. Among these NPs, Pt3Pd1/Vulcan XC-72R catalysts exhibited both excellent catalytic activity and stability of electrocatalytic performances. These improvements were due to the modified function of Pd atoms that underwent water dehydrogenation. This study indicates that, through composition control, these PtPd alloy NPs can serve as an excellent platform for studying catalysis optimization.
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.