Azo dyes are by far the most widely used synthetic,fat-soluble,organic colorants with characteristic chromophoric azo (N=N) groups [1]. There are over 3000 azo dyes in use and they account for 65% of the commercial dye market [2, 3]. These phenyl-azoic derivatives are non-authorized and illegally used in the food industry to enhance and maintain the appearance of food products such as in chilli-,curry-,curcuma-,and palm oil-containing foodstuffs [4, 5, 6]. Besides foodstuffs,Sudan dyes are widely used as colouring agents in the products of chemical industries such as oils,fats,plastics,waxes,petrol,shoes,printing inks,shoe and floor polishing and spirit varnishing [3, 7, 8]. These dyes are categorized as Class 3 carcinogens by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). The European Commission requires products to have documentation confirming the absence of Sudan dyes.
In view of the above incidents,there is a pressing need to develop fast and sensitive methods for the simultaneous determination of Sudan dyes that contaminate foods. In general,an analytical procedure for the determination of azo dyes in sample involves three steps: extraction from the sample,separation and quantification. Regarding the complexity of matrix and the low levels of Sudan dyes contained in real samples,several sample preparation techniques such as liquid-solid extraction [9],pressurized liquid extraction [10],the molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs) [11] and cloud point extraction [12] were developed to allow HPLC-based determination. Reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography combined with different detectors is the commonly used analytical method for the separation of azo dyes [4, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18]. However,some of these detectors are time-consuming and require expensive instruments or laborious pretreatments.
The SPE strategy comprises the isolation and preconcentration of the analyte from a complex matrix by adsorption onto an appropriate sorbent,removal of interfering impurities by washing with a suitable solvent system and selective recovery of the retained analyte with a suitable solvent. The SPE procedure used in most of the studies was based on MIPs sorbents [19, 20, 21]. Polyamide (PA) contains functional groups including acylamino,terminal amino and carboxyl groups which can reversibly form strong hydrogen bonding with substrates and eluents. It is used in the chromatography of phenols and carboxylic acids [22, 23]. So,we decided to use a PA-SPE cartridge for extraction of Sudan dyes,II,III and Red 7B in saffron and urine,which provided a simpler,less expensive and faster technique compared with the use of MIP sorbents. This investigation showed that the polyamide sorbent gave high recovery for mentioned Sudan dyes.
The aim of this work was to develop a rapid and simple analytical method for the quantitative determination of Sudan II,III and Red 7B in saffron and urine. The investigated method combined the SPE of azo dyes from saffron and urine using PA-cartridges and their separation and quantification using LC-UV.
Chromatographic measurements were carried out using a KNAUER HPLC system (HPLC,KNAUER Jahre35,Germany) equipped with a K-1001 HPLC pump and a UV detector K-2800 was used for its detection. The elution was monitored at 507 nm. The other HPLC equipment included a KNAUER K-1500 solvent organizer,KNAUER K-500 degasser. Adjustment of pH of solutions was carried out by a 3030 Jenway pH meter (Leeds,UK). The column used was a C8 column (250 mm×4.5 mm,5 μ m) from Capital (Broxburn,UK). The PA-SPE cartridges (Chromabond PA,3 mL/500 mg) were obtained from Macherey-Nagel (Düren,Germany). The system was equipped with Chromgate HPLC software,Version 3.3. The sonication was done using a 50/60 kHz ultrasonic water bath (SW3,Switzerland). A Denley bench centrifuge model BS400 (Denley Instruments Ltd.,Billingshurst,UK) was used to accelerate the phase separation.
For the determination of Sudan dyes in human urine,different saffron samples were orally administrated by six 30-year-old healthy male volunteers. The volunteers avoided to consume possible Sudan containing foods (spice,chilli powders,paste,tea and sauce) for one week prior to the study. The urine samples (10 mL) were collected just before and 6 h after the administration.
The blank urine samples were provided by healthy volunteers in our laboratory. Actual urine samples were prepared from the same people who were suspicious to the administration of polluted saffron by Sudan dyes. The urine samples were kept frozen at -20 ℃ before clean up by SPE. The frozen urine samples were thawed at room temperature and centrifuged for 10 min at 5000 r/min. White lipidic solid was sedimentated,probably due to the co-sedimentation of the matrices (such as carbamide and uric acid) in urine. Ten milliliters of supernatants were collected and filtered through a 0.45 μ m filter for SPE.
HPLC conditions: mobile phase,methanol/water (70 : 30,v/v); flow rate,1 mL/min; column,C8 (250 mm×4.5 mm,5 μ m.); λ max,507 nm; room temperature.
Effect of some parameters including percentage of methanol in washing solution,pH of washing solution,type and volume of elution solvent and flow rate of sample solution through cartridge on extraction efficiency were investigated using PA cartridge as the sorbent.
To obtain a suitable solvent for elution of analytes from the cartridge,different solvents such as methanol,acetonitrile,THF,ethylacetate,n-hexane and acetone were examined. The best elution solvent for Sudan dyes was found by using 4 mL of each solvent (Fig. 2a). The best recovery of analytes was achieved by THF. For determination of a suitable volume of the elution solvent,different volumes (1,2,3,4,5 and 6 mL) of THF were used for the elution of retained analytes from the cartridge. The most suitable volume of elution was 3 mL (Fig. 2b).
Use of a carefully chosen washing solution in the SPE process to provide an extract free from matrix components,leads to enhanced selectivity in the separation step and more accurate determination. To achieve this purpose,the washing solution must contain the appropriate amount of organic solvent and the highest possible pH (in the recommended range for stability of the sorbent) to remove interfering matrix components without eluting the analytes.
For optimizing the washing solution,different percentages of methanol in water at different pH ranging from 2.5 to 8 were examined. According to the best recovery,the optimum conditions for washing solution were: 10% (v/v) methanol (pH 7) and 7 mL washing solution volume.
The flow rate of aqueous sample solution always has a significant impact in the SPE procedure,because the sample flow rate affected both the recoveries of analytes and loading time in an SPE system. The results indicated that the best recovery of analytes in PA cartridge was achieved at a flow rate of 2.5 mL/min.
The mass concentrations of Sudan dyes in saffron and urine samples were determined by five replicate measurements using standard addition method (n=5). Table 3 presents the mass concentrations of the Sudan dyes found in saffron and urine samples. The analytes were identified by spiking the samples with the standards and comparing their retention times with those of the standard Sudan II,III and Red 7B. Representative chromatograms of saffron and urine samples acquired at optimum mobile phase conditions are presented in Fig. 3.
(a) saffron and (b) urine samples
In a comparative study with other techniques used for determination of Sudan dyes in different samples,shown in Table 4,one can see that comparable results were achieved for this method versus other conventional methods and without the use of expensive and advanced instruments.