多孔芳香骨架吸附剂-固相萃取-高效液相色谱法同时测定辣椒粉中4种偶氮类染料

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1123.2018.11029

色谱 ›› 2019, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (5): 491-498.DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1123.2018.11029

多孔芳香骨架吸附剂-固相萃取-高效液相色谱法同时测定辣椒粉中4种偶氮类染料

闻威¹, 张文芬¹, 张岩皓², 赵无垛¹, 张书胜¹

1. 郑州大学化学与分子工程学院, 河南郑州 450001;
2. 香港浸会大学化学系环境与生物分析国家重点实验室, 香港 999077

收稿日期:2018-11-19 出版日期:2019-05-08 发布日期:2015-03-23
通讯作者: 赵无垛,Tel:(0371)67739685,E-mail:zhaowuduo@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（21475119，21775140）.

Simultaneous determination of four azo dyes in paprika powder by high performance liquid chromatography using a porous aromatic framework as the solid-phase extraction sorbent

WEN Wei¹, ZHANG Wenfen¹, ZHANG Yanhao², ZHAO Wuduo¹, ZHANG Shusheng¹

1. College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China;
2. State Key Laboratory of Environmental and Biological Analysis, Department of Chemistry, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong 999077, China

Received:2018-11-19 Online:2019-05-08 Published:2015-03-23
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 21475119, 21775140).

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

建立了固相萃取-高效液相色谱同时测定辣椒粉中对位红、酸性橙Ⅱ、苏丹红Ⅰ和苏丹红Ⅱ 4种偶氮染料的方法。以多孔芳香骨架-6（PAF-6）材料作为固相萃取吸附剂，考察并获得了影响自制固相萃取柱的萃取效率和吸附容量等主要因素。在优化条件下，4种目标分析物的检出限（LOD）为1.5~7.0 μg/L（信噪比S/N=3），定量限（LOQ）为5.0~22.1 μg/L（S/N=10），加标回收率为76.5%~89.8%，相对标准偏差（RSD）均不大于5.3%（n=6）。此外，基于量子化学计算，考察了PAF-6与目标分析物之间的相互作用机制，结果表明，目标分析物可以稳定地吸附在PAF-6分子上。该方法准确可靠，具有良好的回收率和较高的灵敏度，可用于辣椒粉中4种偶氮类染料的检测。

关键词: 多孔芳香骨架, 高效液相色谱, 固相萃取, 辣椒粉, 偶氮染料

Abstract:

In this study, a solid-phase extraction-high performance liquid chromatography (SPE-HPLC) method was developed for the determination of Para Red, Orange Ⅱ sodium salt, Sudan Ⅰ, and Sudan Ⅱ in paprika powder based on a self-made porous aromatic framework-6 (PAF-6) solid-phase extraction cartridge. The major factors affecting the extraction efficiency and adsorption capacity of this solid-phase extraction were evaluated. Under optimized conditions, the limits of detection (LODs) and limits of quantification (LOQs) of the four target analytes ranged from 1.5 to 7.0 μg/L and 5.0 to 22.1 μg/L, respectively. The recoveries were in the range of 76.5-89.8%, and the relative standard deviation (RSD) was not more than 5.3% (n=6). Moreover, quantum chemistry calculations were performed to investigate the molecular interaction mechanism between the PAF-6 and target analytes. The results indicated that the target molecules could be stably adsorbed onto the PAF-6. The method is accurate, reliable, and sensitive, and can be successfully applied to detect the four azo dyes in paprika powder.

Key words: azo dyes, high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), paprika powder, porous aromatic framework, solid phase extraction (SPE)

中图分类号:

O658

闻威, 张文芬, 张岩皓, 赵无垛, 张书胜. 多孔芳香骨架吸附剂-固相萃取-高效液相色谱法同时测定辣椒粉中4种偶氮类染料[J]. 色谱, 2019, 37(5): 491-498.

WEN Wei, ZHANG Wenfen, ZHANG Yanhao, ZHAO Wuduo, ZHANG Shusheng. Simultaneous determination of four azo dyes in paprika powder by high performance liquid chromatography using a porous aromatic framework as the solid-phase extraction sorbent[J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2019, 37(5): 491-498.

参考文献

[1] López-López A, Pic J S, Debellefontaine H. Chemosphere, 2007, 66(11):2120
[2] Combes R D, Haveland-Smith R B. Mutat Res, 1982, 98(2):101
[3] Yun H, Liu X, Wang J, et al. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2013, 31(9):845 云环, 刘鑫, 王静, 等. 色谱, 2013, 31(9):845
[4] Xing Y, Gao H, Liu Y D, et al. Food Research and Development, 2017, 38(13):140 邢燕, 高慧, 刘玉栋, 等. 食品研究与开发, 2017, 38(13):140
[5] Li C Y, Chen L G, You X X. Environ Sci Pollut Res, 2014, 21(21):12382
[6] Murty M, Chary N S, Prabhakar S, et al. Food Chem, 2009, 115(4):1556
[7] Ou Y M, Pei L, Lai K Q, et al. Food Anal Methods, 2017, 10(3):565
[8] Awadelkarim K D, Mariani-Costantini R, Elwali N E. Sci Total Environ, 2012, 423:214
[9] Fonovich T M. Drug Chem Toxicol, 2013, 36(3):343
[10] Gómez M, Arancibia V, Aliaga M, et al. Food Chem, 2016, 212:807
[11] Ávila M, Zougagh M, Escarpa A, et al. J Supercrit Fluids, 2011, 55(3):977
[12] Fu Y, Zhu Y, Wu Y L. Journal of Instrumental Analysis, 2017, 36(4):496 付岩, 朱勇, 吴银良. 分析测试学报, 2017, 36(4):496
[13] Erta? E, Özer H, Alasalvar C. Food Chem, 2007, 105(2):756
[14] Chen B, Chao X L, Gao W W, et al. Chemistry & Bioengineering, 2017, 34(10):44 陈碧, 晁小练, 高雯雯, 等. 化学与生物工程, 2017, 34(10):44
[15] Liu J, Gong Z B. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2012, 30(6):624 刘珺, 弓振斌. 色谱, 2012, 30(6):624
[16] Chen D M, Li X Q, Tao Y F, et al. J Chromatogr B, 2013, 939:45
[17] Pi?tkowska M, Jedziniak P, Olejnik M, et al. J Vet Res, 2017, 61(3):299
[18] Otero P, Saha S K, Hussein A, et al. Food Anal Methods, 2017, 10(4):876
[19] Mejia E, Ding Y S, Mora M F, et al. Food Chem, 2007, 102(4):1027
[20] Wang Y, Yang H, Wang B, et al. J Sci Food Agric, 2011, 91(10):1836
[21] Rejczak T, Tuzimski T. Food Anal Methods, 2017, 10(11):3572
[22] Chen L Y, Hu J G, Zhang W, et al. Food Anal Methods, 2015, 8(8):1903
[23] Qi P, Zeng T, Wen Z J, et al. Food Chem, 2011, 125(4):1462
[24] Hu M Z, Wu L J, Song Y, et al. Food Anal Methods, 2016, 9(7):2124
[25] Yang F, Bian Z Y, Li Z H, et al. J AOAC Int, 2016, 99(5):1370
[26] Chen N, Liu K F, Zhang Y P. Journal of Instrumental Analysis, 2014, 33(8):959 陈娜, 刘坤峰, 张裕平. 分析测试学报, 2014, 33(8):959
[27] Zhang Z, Xu S F, Li J H, et al. J Agric Food Chem, 2011, 60(1):180
[28] Lin W, Wei S B, Jiang R F, et al. Anal Chim Acta, 2016, 933:117
[29] Niu X Y, Ding S Y, Wang W F, et al. J Chromatogr A, 2016, 1436:109
[30] Yin D, Chen Y L, Zhang Y H, et al. Chromatographia, 2018, 81(5):749
[31] Chen Y L, Zhang W F, Zhang Y H, et al. J Chromatogr A, 2018, 1556:1
[32] Zhang W F, Zhang Y H, Zhou L L, et al. Anal Methods, 2016, 8(17):3613
[33] Liu H Y, Yang J F, Lü J L, et al. Chemical Industry Times, 2014, 28(12):15 刘环宇, 杨剑锋, 吕君亮, 等. 化工时刊, 2014, 28(12):15
[34] Liu R Y, Hei W J, He P L, et al. J Chromatogr B, 2011, 879(24):2416

多孔芳香骨架吸附剂-固相萃取-高效液相色谱法同时测定辣椒粉中4种偶氮类染料

Simultaneous determination of four azo dyes in paprika powder by high performance liquid chromatography using a porous aromatic framework as the solid-phase extraction sorbent

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

扫码分享

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	史洪飞, 徐伯芃, 徐成鑫, 周修齐, 许宏福. 溶剂萃取-高效液相色谱-四极杆飞行时间质谱法快速提取检测干燥恰特草中5种生物碱成分[J]. 色谱, 2023, 41(9): 771-780.
[2]	赵芮, 黄晴雯, 余智颖, 韩铮, 范楷, 赵志辉, 聂冬霞. QuEChERS-超高效液相色谱-串联质谱法同时测定水果中36种真菌毒素[J]. 色谱, 2023, 41(9): 760-770.
[3]	刘宇, 邢家溧, 沈坚, 毕晓丽, 毛玲燕, 徐晓蓉, 张书芬, 娄永江, 吴希, 穆应花. 高效液相色谱-蒸发光散射检测法同时测定固态食品中6种稀有糖[J]. 色谱, 2023, 41(9): 781-788.
[4]	岳超, 赵超群, 毛思浩, 王展华, 施贝, 徐欣丰, 梁晶晶. 通过式固相萃取净化-超高效液相色谱-串联质谱法测定液体乳中10种氨基甲酸酯类农药残留[J]. 色谱, 2023, 41(9): 807-813.
[5]	钱正明, 吴梦奇, 谭国英, 金李玲, 李宁, 谢菊英. 高效液相色谱紫外等吸收波长法快速测定秦皮中秦皮甲素和秦皮乙素[J]. 色谱, 2023, 41(8): 690-697.
[6]	吴萍萍, 林仁义, 黄丽英. 三相中空纤维液相微萃取-高效液相色谱法测定铁皮石斛和金线莲中3种植物生长调节剂[J]. 色谱, 2023, 41(8): 683-689.
[7]	马超, 倪洪星, 戚羽霖. 超高效液相色谱-傅里叶变换离子回旋共振质谱法解析溶解性有机质的化学多样性[J]. 色谱, 2023, 41(8): 662-672.
[8]	曹沁玲, 赵小丹, 沈国滨, 汪竹琴, 章弘扬, 张敏, 胡坪. 基于超高效液相色谱-电雾式检测的槐糖脂指纹图谱[J]. 色谱, 2023, 41(8): 722-729.
[9]	孟二琼, 念琪循, 李峰, 张秋萍, 许茜, 王春民. 磺酸化磁性氮化碳固相萃取-超高液相色谱-串联质谱筛检淡水鱼中孔雀石绿和隐色孔雀石绿[J]. 色谱, 2023, 41(8): 673-682.
[10]	高祎阳, 丁亚丽, 陈鲁玉, 杜芳, 辛绪波, 冯娟娟, 孙明霞, 冯洋, 孙敏. 共价有机框架材料在固相萃取中的最新应用进展[J]. 色谱, 2023, 41(7): 545-553.
[11]	秦童童, 高莉, 赵文杰. 超交联多孔有机聚合物在柱固相萃取中的应用进展[J]. 色谱, 2023, 41(7): 554-561.
[12]	陈东洋, 张昊, 张磊, 王一红, 王小丹, 冯家力, 梁静, 钟旋. 固相萃取-超高效液相色谱-串联质谱法测定发酵食品中的曲酸[J]. 色谱, 2023, 41(7): 632-639.
[13]	赵原庆, 胡锴, 杨成, 韩鹏昭, 李立新, 刘晓冰, 张振强, 张书胜. 基于Ti₃C₂T_x/聚酰亚胺复合材料的分散固相萃取-液相色谱法测定尿液中儿茶酚胺类神经递质[J]. 色谱, 2023, 41(7): 572-581.
[14]	王秋旭, 冯启言, 朱雪强. 加速溶剂萃取-固相萃取净化结合超高效液相色谱-串联质谱法测定沉积物中双酚类化合物[J]. 色谱, 2023, 41(7): 582-590.
[15]	杨哲, 吕建霞, 吴一荻, 蒋力维, 李冬梅. 超高效液相色谱法同时测定电子烟油中的5种吲哚/吲唑酰胺类合成大麻素[J]. 色谱, 2023, 41(7): 602-609.