色谱 ›› 2026, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (4): 467-478.DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1123.2025.07017
孙晶1,2, 张瑜1,4, 刘丰茂2,*(
), 赵文1, 金玥1, 张琳1, 薛晓锋1, 陈蕊1,*(
), 周画天3
收稿日期:2025-07-21
出版日期:2026-04-08
发布日期:2026-04-13
通讯作者:
* Tel:010-62731978,E-mail:lfm2000@cau.edu.cn(刘丰茂);
E-mail:chenrui01@caas.cn(陈蕊).基金资助:
SUN Jing1,2, ZHANG Yu1,4, LIU Fengmao2,*(
), ZHAO Wen1, JIN Yue1, ZHANG Lin1, XUE Xiaofeng1, CHEN Rui1,*(
), ZHOU Huatian3
Received:2025-07-21
Online:2026-04-08
Published:2026-04-13
Supported by:摘要:
蜂蜜中抗生素残留的精准检测是保障蜂产品质量与规范用药监管的关键环节。针对蜂蜜中糖类含量高、黏度大、基质干扰强以及抗生素种类多样、残留标准覆盖有限等问题,本工作构建了一种基于混合模式亲水-疏水平衡(mHLB)磁性材料的磁分散固相萃取-高效液相色谱-串联质谱(MDSPE-HPLC-MS/MS)方法,用于蜂蜜中氯霉素、喹诺酮类和磺胺类共38种抗生素残留的定量分析。通过Plackett-Burman设计筛选影响mHLB萃取效率的关键因素,并结合响应面法系统优化MDSPE的前处理步骤,在确保分析性能的同时显著简化操作流程。在优化的MDSPE条件下(10 mg mHLB吸附5 mL样品提取液,1 mL甲醇洗脱),38种抗生素在0.02~200 μg/L范围内线性关系良好(R²>0.99),检出限为0.01~0.12 μg/kg,定量限为0.02~0.39 μg/kg,回收率为70.5%~109.3%,相对标准偏差低于10.8%。该方法可有效控制基质干扰,适用于痕量抗生素的准确定量。在42批次实际样品的应用中,检出部分禁用或尚未纳入限量目录的抗生素,提示蜂产品中潜在的用药风险与监管局限性。此外,与已有方法比较,本方法操作简便,灵敏度高,适用性强,绿色评分达0.73,具备良好的环境友好性和方法学先进性。本研究为蜂蜜中抗生素残留的风险监测和标准完善提供了可靠的技术支持,并可为复杂基质中痕量污染物的绿色分析方法的开发提供参考。
中图分类号:
孙晶, 张瑜, 刘丰茂, 赵文, 金玥, 张琳, 薛晓锋, 陈蕊, 周画天. 磁分散固相萃取-液相色谱-串联质谱法测定蜂蜜中38种抗生素残留[J]. 色谱, 2026, 44(4): 467-478.
SUN Jing, ZHANG Yu, LIU Fengmao, ZHAO Wen, JIN Yue, ZHANG Lin, XUE Xiaofeng, CHEN Rui, ZHOU Huatian. Determination of 38 antibiotic residues in honey by magnetic dispersive solid-phase extraction-liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry[J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2026, 44(4): 467-478.
| Compound | Abbreviation | CAS No. | Retention time/min | Parent ion (m/z) | Product ions (m/z) | CEs/eV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chloramphenicol compounds (氯霉素类化合物) | CAPs | |||||
| Chloramphenicol(氯霉素) | LV | 56-75-7 | 8.76 | 320.9 | 257.0*, 194.0 | 8, 9 |
| Quinolone compounds (喹诺酮类化合物) | QNs | |||||
| Difloxacin (双氟沙星) | DIF | 98106-17-3 | 8.78 | 400.0 | 356.1*, 382.1 | 20, 20 |
| Lomefloxacin (洛美沙星) | LOM | 98079-51-7 | 8.33 | 352.0 | 265.0*, 334.0 | 24, 22 |
| Danofloxacin (达氟沙星) | DAN | 112398-08-0 | 8.26 | 358.2 | 340.1*, 255.0 | 25, 46 |
| Enrofloxacin (恩诺沙星) | ENR | 93106-60-6 | 8.17 | 360.0 | 316.2*, 342.1 | 20, 20 |
| Orbifloxacin (奥比杀星) | ORB | 113617-63-3 | 8.51 | 396.2 | 295.1*, 352.1 | 22, 15 |
| Gatifloxacin (加替沙星) | GAT | 112811-59-3 | 9.43 | 376.0 | 332.0*, 261.0 | 15, 24 |
| Marbofloxacin (马波杀星) | MAR | 115550-35-1 | 6.87 | 363.5 | 345.1*, 320.1 | 20, 10 |
| Enoxacin (依诺沙星) | ENO | 74011-58-8 | 7.46 | 321.0 | 303.1*, 232.0 | 18, 38 |
| Fleroxacin (氟罗杀星) | FLE | 79660-72-3 | 6.98 | 370.1 | 326.0*, 269.0 | 18, 28 |
| Norfloxacin (诺氟沙星) | NOR | 70458-96-7 | 7.67 | 320.0 | 302.1*, 276.1 | 20, 15 |
| Ofloxacin (氧氟沙星) | OFL | 82419-36-1 | 7.40 | 362.0 | 261.1*, 318.1 | 26, 15 |
| Pefloxacin (培氟沙星) | PEF | 70458-92-3 | 7.45 | 334.0 | 316.0*, 290.0 | 25, 20 |
| Ciprofloxacin (环丙沙星) | CIP | 85721-33-1 | 7.97 | 332.1 | 314.1*, 288.0 | 20, 24 |
| Sparfloxacin (司帕沙星) | SPA | 110871-86-8 | 9.89 | 393.1 | 349.0*, 292.0 | 21, 36 |
| Cinoxacin (西诺杀星) | CIN | 28657-80-9 | 9.88 | 263.0 | 189.0*, 217.0 | 30, 20 |
| Oxolinic acid (噁喹酸) | OXO | 14698-29-4 | 10.31 | 262.1 | 244.2*, 216.0 | 16, 15 |
| Nalidixic acid (萘啶酸) | NAL | 389-08-2 | 10.99 | 233.0 | 215.0*, 187.0 | 10, 20 |
| Flumequine (氟甲喹) | FLU | 42835-25-6 | 10.10 | 262.1 | 244.1*, 202.1 | 12, 18 |
| Sarafloxacin (沙拉沙星) | SAR | 98105-99-8 | 9.13 | 386.1 | 368.1*, 342.1 | 20, 15 |
| Sulfonamide compounds (磺胺类化合物) | SAs | |||||
| Sulfadiazine (磺胺嘧啶) | SDZ | 68-35-9 | 4.67 | 251.0 | 156.0*, 108.0 | 10, 22 |
| Sulfathiazole (磺胺噻唑) | STZ | 72-14-0 | 5.25 | 256.0 | 156.0*, 108.0 | 10, 25 |
| Sulfapyridine (磺胺吡啶) | SPD | 144-83-2 | 5.36 | 250.0 | 156.0*, 184.0 | 15, 15 |
| Sulfamerazine (磺胺甲基嘧啶) | SMR | 127-79-7 | 5.72 | 265.0 | 156.0*, 172.0 | 15, 15 |
| Sulfameter (磺胺对甲氧嘧啶) | SME | 651-06-9 | 6.90 | 281.0 | 156.0*, 92.0 | 10, 20 |
| Sulfamethizole (磺胺甲噻二唑) | SMI | 144-82-1 | 6.61 | 271.0 | 156.0*, 108.0 | 10, 25 |
| Sulfamethazine (磺胺二甲基嘧啶) | SMA | 57-68-1 | 6.62 | 279.0 | 186.1*, 156.0 | 15, 10 |
| Sulfamethoxypyridazine (磺胺甲氧哒嗪) | SMP | 80-35-3 | 6.45 | 281.0 | 156.0*, 92.0 | 10, 20 |
| Sulfachloropyridazine (磺胺氯哒嗪) | SCP | 80-32-0 | 7.18 | 285.0 | 156.0*, 108.0 | 15, 20 |
| Sulfamonomethoxine (磺胺间甲氧嘧啶) | SMM | 1220-83-3 | 7.65 | 281.0 | 156.0*, 92.0 | 15, 15 |
| Sulfadimethoxazole (磺胺二甲异噁唑) | SSZ | 127-69-5 | 7.97 | 268.0 | 113.0*, 156.0 | 10, 5 |
| Sulfadoxine (磺胺邻二甲氧嘧啶) | SDX | 2447-57-6 | 7.93 | 311.0 | 156.0*, 108.0 | 15, 20 |
| Sulfamethoxazole (磺胺甲噁唑) | SMX | 723-46-6 | 7.36 | 254.0 | 156.0*, 147.0 | 15, 15 |
| Benzenesulfonamide (磺胺苯酰) | SB | 98-10-2 | 8.50 | 277.1 | 156.0*, 108.0 | 6, 22 |
| Sulfaphenazole (磺胺苯吡唑) | SPZ | 526-08-9 | 9.24 | 315.0 | 160.0*, 156.0 | 20, 20 |
| Sulfaclozina (磺胺氯吡嗪) | SCZ | 102-65-8 | 7.18 | 285.0 | 156.0*, 108.0 | 10, 22 |
| Sulfadimethoxine (磺胺间二甲氧嘧啶) | SDM | 155-91-9 | 7.93 | 311.0 | 156.0*, 218.0 | 15, 20 |
| Sulfaquinoxaline (磺胺喹噁啉) | SQX | 59-40-5 | 10.13 | 301.1 | 92.0*, 156.0 | 29, 11 |
表1 38种抗生素的质谱参数
Table 1 Mass spectrometry parameters of the 38 antibiotics
| Compound | Abbreviation | CAS No. | Retention time/min | Parent ion (m/z) | Product ions (m/z) | CEs/eV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chloramphenicol compounds (氯霉素类化合物) | CAPs | |||||
| Chloramphenicol(氯霉素) | LV | 56-75-7 | 8.76 | 320.9 | 257.0*, 194.0 | 8, 9 |
| Quinolone compounds (喹诺酮类化合物) | QNs | |||||
| Difloxacin (双氟沙星) | DIF | 98106-17-3 | 8.78 | 400.0 | 356.1*, 382.1 | 20, 20 |
| Lomefloxacin (洛美沙星) | LOM | 98079-51-7 | 8.33 | 352.0 | 265.0*, 334.0 | 24, 22 |
| Danofloxacin (达氟沙星) | DAN | 112398-08-0 | 8.26 | 358.2 | 340.1*, 255.0 | 25, 46 |
| Enrofloxacin (恩诺沙星) | ENR | 93106-60-6 | 8.17 | 360.0 | 316.2*, 342.1 | 20, 20 |
| Orbifloxacin (奥比杀星) | ORB | 113617-63-3 | 8.51 | 396.2 | 295.1*, 352.1 | 22, 15 |
| Gatifloxacin (加替沙星) | GAT | 112811-59-3 | 9.43 | 376.0 | 332.0*, 261.0 | 15, 24 |
| Marbofloxacin (马波杀星) | MAR | 115550-35-1 | 6.87 | 363.5 | 345.1*, 320.1 | 20, 10 |
| Enoxacin (依诺沙星) | ENO | 74011-58-8 | 7.46 | 321.0 | 303.1*, 232.0 | 18, 38 |
| Fleroxacin (氟罗杀星) | FLE | 79660-72-3 | 6.98 | 370.1 | 326.0*, 269.0 | 18, 28 |
| Norfloxacin (诺氟沙星) | NOR | 70458-96-7 | 7.67 | 320.0 | 302.1*, 276.1 | 20, 15 |
| Ofloxacin (氧氟沙星) | OFL | 82419-36-1 | 7.40 | 362.0 | 261.1*, 318.1 | 26, 15 |
| Pefloxacin (培氟沙星) | PEF | 70458-92-3 | 7.45 | 334.0 | 316.0*, 290.0 | 25, 20 |
| Ciprofloxacin (环丙沙星) | CIP | 85721-33-1 | 7.97 | 332.1 | 314.1*, 288.0 | 20, 24 |
| Sparfloxacin (司帕沙星) | SPA | 110871-86-8 | 9.89 | 393.1 | 349.0*, 292.0 | 21, 36 |
| Cinoxacin (西诺杀星) | CIN | 28657-80-9 | 9.88 | 263.0 | 189.0*, 217.0 | 30, 20 |
| Oxolinic acid (噁喹酸) | OXO | 14698-29-4 | 10.31 | 262.1 | 244.2*, 216.0 | 16, 15 |
| Nalidixic acid (萘啶酸) | NAL | 389-08-2 | 10.99 | 233.0 | 215.0*, 187.0 | 10, 20 |
| Flumequine (氟甲喹) | FLU | 42835-25-6 | 10.10 | 262.1 | 244.1*, 202.1 | 12, 18 |
| Sarafloxacin (沙拉沙星) | SAR | 98105-99-8 | 9.13 | 386.1 | 368.1*, 342.1 | 20, 15 |
| Sulfonamide compounds (磺胺类化合物) | SAs | |||||
| Sulfadiazine (磺胺嘧啶) | SDZ | 68-35-9 | 4.67 | 251.0 | 156.0*, 108.0 | 10, 22 |
| Sulfathiazole (磺胺噻唑) | STZ | 72-14-0 | 5.25 | 256.0 | 156.0*, 108.0 | 10, 25 |
| Sulfapyridine (磺胺吡啶) | SPD | 144-83-2 | 5.36 | 250.0 | 156.0*, 184.0 | 15, 15 |
| Sulfamerazine (磺胺甲基嘧啶) | SMR | 127-79-7 | 5.72 | 265.0 | 156.0*, 172.0 | 15, 15 |
| Sulfameter (磺胺对甲氧嘧啶) | SME | 651-06-9 | 6.90 | 281.0 | 156.0*, 92.0 | 10, 20 |
| Sulfamethizole (磺胺甲噻二唑) | SMI | 144-82-1 | 6.61 | 271.0 | 156.0*, 108.0 | 10, 25 |
| Sulfamethazine (磺胺二甲基嘧啶) | SMA | 57-68-1 | 6.62 | 279.0 | 186.1*, 156.0 | 15, 10 |
| Sulfamethoxypyridazine (磺胺甲氧哒嗪) | SMP | 80-35-3 | 6.45 | 281.0 | 156.0*, 92.0 | 10, 20 |
| Sulfachloropyridazine (磺胺氯哒嗪) | SCP | 80-32-0 | 7.18 | 285.0 | 156.0*, 108.0 | 15, 20 |
| Sulfamonomethoxine (磺胺间甲氧嘧啶) | SMM | 1220-83-3 | 7.65 | 281.0 | 156.0*, 92.0 | 15, 15 |
| Sulfadimethoxazole (磺胺二甲异噁唑) | SSZ | 127-69-5 | 7.97 | 268.0 | 113.0*, 156.0 | 10, 5 |
| Sulfadoxine (磺胺邻二甲氧嘧啶) | SDX | 2447-57-6 | 7.93 | 311.0 | 156.0*, 108.0 | 15, 20 |
| Sulfamethoxazole (磺胺甲噁唑) | SMX | 723-46-6 | 7.36 | 254.0 | 156.0*, 147.0 | 15, 15 |
| Benzenesulfonamide (磺胺苯酰) | SB | 98-10-2 | 8.50 | 277.1 | 156.0*, 108.0 | 6, 22 |
| Sulfaphenazole (磺胺苯吡唑) | SPZ | 526-08-9 | 9.24 | 315.0 | 160.0*, 156.0 | 20, 20 |
| Sulfaclozina (磺胺氯吡嗪) | SCZ | 102-65-8 | 7.18 | 285.0 | 156.0*, 108.0 | 10, 22 |
| Sulfadimethoxine (磺胺间二甲氧嘧啶) | SDM | 155-91-9 | 7.93 | 311.0 | 156.0*, 218.0 | 15, 20 |
| Sulfaquinoxaline (磺胺喹噁啉) | SQX | 59-40-5 | 10.13 | 301.1 | 92.0*, 156.0 | 29, 11 |
| Running sequence | X1/mg | X2/mL | X3/min | X4/mL | X5/mL | X6/min | X7/% | Recoveries/% | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LV | QNs | SAs | ||||||||
| 1 | 5.0 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 20 | 1.9 | 6.7 | 5.0 |
| 2 | 5.0 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 100 | 118.8 | 87.2 | 75.5 |
| 3 | 30.0 | 5.0 | 0.5 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 100 | 123.1 | 88.9 | 80.4 |
| 4 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 3.0 | 100 | 169.7 | 80.1 | 67.4 |
| 5 | 30.0 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 20 | 2.0 | 6.7 | 6.3 |
| 6 | 30.0 | 5.0 | 0.5 | 3.0 | 0.5 | 3.0 | 20 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| 7 | 30.0 | 5.0 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 20 | 2.0 | 9.6 | 4.3 |
| 8 | 30.0 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 100 | 122.5 | 39.6 | 50.8 |
| 9 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 20 | 2.4 | 9.6 | 5.3 |
| 10 | 5.0 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 20 | 11.0 | 19.5 | 21.9 |
| 11 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 100 | 126.7 | 85.6 | 78.3 |
| 12 | 30.0 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 0.5 | 3.0 | 100 | 175.9 | 49.0 | 62.8 |
表2 Plackett-Burman实验设计及结果
Table 2 Plackett-Burman experimental design and results
| Running sequence | X1/mg | X2/mL | X3/min | X4/mL | X5/mL | X6/min | X7/% | Recoveries/% | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LV | QNs | SAs | ||||||||
| 1 | 5.0 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 20 | 1.9 | 6.7 | 5.0 |
| 2 | 5.0 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 100 | 118.8 | 87.2 | 75.5 |
| 3 | 30.0 | 5.0 | 0.5 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 100 | 123.1 | 88.9 | 80.4 |
| 4 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 3.0 | 100 | 169.7 | 80.1 | 67.4 |
| 5 | 30.0 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 20 | 2.0 | 6.7 | 6.3 |
| 6 | 30.0 | 5.0 | 0.5 | 3.0 | 0.5 | 3.0 | 20 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| 7 | 30.0 | 5.0 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 20 | 2.0 | 9.6 | 4.3 |
| 8 | 30.0 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 100 | 122.5 | 39.6 | 50.8 |
| 9 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 20 | 2.4 | 9.6 | 5.3 |
| 10 | 5.0 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 20 | 11.0 | 19.5 | 21.9 |
| 11 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 100 | 126.7 | 85.6 | 78.3 |
| 12 | 30.0 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 0.5 | 3.0 | 100 | 175.9 | 49.0 | 62.8 |
| Source | CAP | QNs | SAs | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F-value | P-value | Significance | F-value | P-value | Significance | F-value | P-value | Significance | |
| Model | 19.93 | 0.006 | ** | 131.56 | 0.000 | ** | 69.20 | 0.001 | ** |
| Linear | 19.93 | 0.006 | ** | 131.56 | 0.000 | ** | 69.20 | 0.001 | ** |
| X1 | 0.00 | 0.948 | — | 47.80 | 0.002 | ** | 7.69 | 0.050 | * |
| X2 | 0.01 | 0.913 | — | 22.85 | 0.009 | ** | 0.62 | 0.476 | — |
| X3 | 0.13 | 0.739 | — | 17.30 | 0.014 | * | 0.41 | 0.557 | — |
| X4 | 0.01 | 0.930 | — | 3.71 | 0.126 | — | 3.79 | 0.123 | — |
| X5 | 1.60 | 0.275 | — | 66.92 | 0.001 | ** | 18.46 | 0.013 | * |
| X6 | 2.65 | 0.179 | — | 0.00 | 0.984 | — | 0.79 | 0.425 | — |
| X7 | 135.07 | 0.000 | ** | 762.34 | 0.000 | ** | 452.62 | 0.000 | ** |
| R2 | 0.9721 0.9233 | 0.9957 0.9881 | 0.9818 0.9775 | ||||||
| Adj. R2 | |||||||||
表3 Plackett-Burman实验方差分析结果
Table 3 Analysis of variance results of Plackett-Burman experiment
| Source | CAP | QNs | SAs | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F-value | P-value | Significance | F-value | P-value | Significance | F-value | P-value | Significance | |
| Model | 19.93 | 0.006 | ** | 131.56 | 0.000 | ** | 69.20 | 0.001 | ** |
| Linear | 19.93 | 0.006 | ** | 131.56 | 0.000 | ** | 69.20 | 0.001 | ** |
| X1 | 0.00 | 0.948 | — | 47.80 | 0.002 | ** | 7.69 | 0.050 | * |
| X2 | 0.01 | 0.913 | — | 22.85 | 0.009 | ** | 0.62 | 0.476 | — |
| X3 | 0.13 | 0.739 | — | 17.30 | 0.014 | * | 0.41 | 0.557 | — |
| X4 | 0.01 | 0.930 | — | 3.71 | 0.126 | — | 3.79 | 0.123 | — |
| X5 | 1.60 | 0.275 | — | 66.92 | 0.001 | ** | 18.46 | 0.013 | * |
| X6 | 2.65 | 0.179 | — | 0.00 | 0.984 | — | 0.79 | 0.425 | — |
| X7 | 135.07 | 0.000 | ** | 762.34 | 0.000 | ** | 452.62 | 0.000 | ** |
| R2 | 0.9721 0.9233 | 0.9957 0.9881 | 0.9818 0.9775 | ||||||
| Adj. R2 | |||||||||
| Running sequence | X1/mg | X2/mL | X5/mL | X7/% | Recovery/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 17.5 | 3 | 0.5 | 20 | 3.3 |
| 2 | 17.5 | 3 | 0.5 | 100 | 67.2 |
| 3 | 17.5 | 3 | 2 | 20 | 12.6 |
| 4 | 17.5 | 3 | 2 | 100 | 56.3 |
| 5 | 5 | 1 | 1.25 | 60 | 64.7 |
| 6 | 30 | 1 | 1.25 | 60 | 38.4 |
| 7 | 5 | 5 | 1.25 | 60 | 50.8 |
| 8 | 30 | 5 | 1.25 | 60 | 46.2 |
| 9 | 17.5 | 1 | 1.25 | 20 | 9.1 |
| 10 | 17.5 | 1 | 1.25 | 100 | 80.6 |
| 11 | 17.5 | 5 | 1.25 | 20 | 8.0 |
| 12 | 17.5 | 5 | 1.25 | 100 | 68.4 |
| 13 | 5 | 3 | 0.5 | 60 | 59.7 |
| 14 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 60 | 59.5 |
| 15 | 30 | 3 | 0.5 | 60 | 29.0 |
| 16 | 30 | 3 | 2 | 60 | 47.1 |
| 17 | 5 | 3 | 1.25 | 20 | 15.2 |
| 18 | 5 | 3 | 1.25 | 100 | 47.2 |
| 19 | 30 | 3 | 1.25 | 20 | 5.1 |
| 20 | 30 | 3 | 1.25 | 100 | 41.6 |
| 21 | 17.5 | 1 | 0.5 | 60 | 35.8 |
| 22 | 17.5 | 1 | 2 | 60 | 74.0 |
| 23 | 17.5 | 5 | 0.5 | 60 | 50.0 |
| 24 | 17.5 | 5 | 2 | 60 | 74.2 |
| 25 | 17.5 | 3 | 1.25 | 60 | 47.6 |
| 26 | 17.5 | 3 | 1.25 | 60 | 51.9 |
| 27 | 17.5 | 3 | 1.25 | 60 | 38.5 |
表4 响应面优化实验设计
Table 4 Experimental design for response surface optimization
| Running sequence | X1/mg | X2/mL | X5/mL | X7/% | Recovery/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 17.5 | 3 | 0.5 | 20 | 3.3 |
| 2 | 17.5 | 3 | 0.5 | 100 | 67.2 |
| 3 | 17.5 | 3 | 2 | 20 | 12.6 |
| 4 | 17.5 | 3 | 2 | 100 | 56.3 |
| 5 | 5 | 1 | 1.25 | 60 | 64.7 |
| 6 | 30 | 1 | 1.25 | 60 | 38.4 |
| 7 | 5 | 5 | 1.25 | 60 | 50.8 |
| 8 | 30 | 5 | 1.25 | 60 | 46.2 |
| 9 | 17.5 | 1 | 1.25 | 20 | 9.1 |
| 10 | 17.5 | 1 | 1.25 | 100 | 80.6 |
| 11 | 17.5 | 5 | 1.25 | 20 | 8.0 |
| 12 | 17.5 | 5 | 1.25 | 100 | 68.4 |
| 13 | 5 | 3 | 0.5 | 60 | 59.7 |
| 14 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 60 | 59.5 |
| 15 | 30 | 3 | 0.5 | 60 | 29.0 |
| 16 | 30 | 3 | 2 | 60 | 47.1 |
| 17 | 5 | 3 | 1.25 | 20 | 15.2 |
| 18 | 5 | 3 | 1.25 | 100 | 47.2 |
| 19 | 30 | 3 | 1.25 | 20 | 5.1 |
| 20 | 30 | 3 | 1.25 | 100 | 41.6 |
| 21 | 17.5 | 1 | 0.5 | 60 | 35.8 |
| 22 | 17.5 | 1 | 2 | 60 | 74.0 |
| 23 | 17.5 | 5 | 0.5 | 60 | 50.0 |
| 24 | 17.5 | 5 | 2 | 60 | 74.2 |
| 25 | 17.5 | 3 | 1.25 | 60 | 47.6 |
| 26 | 17.5 | 3 | 1.25 | 60 | 51.9 |
| 27 | 17.5 | 3 | 1.25 | 60 | 38.5 |
| Source | Sum of squares | df | Mean square | F-value | P-value | Significance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 Adj. R2 | 0.8974 0.7777 | |||||
| Model | 12007.74 | 14 | 857.7 | 7.5 | 0.0006 | ** |
| X1 | 672.19 | 1 | 672.19 | 5.88 | 0.0321 | * |
| X2 | 2.08 | 1 | 2.08 | 0.0181 | 0.8951 | — |
| X5 | 515.47 | 1 | 515.47 | 4.51 | 0.0453 | * |
| X7 | 7898.35 | 1 | 7 898.35 | 69.04 | <0.0001 | ** |
| X7X5 | 101.87 | 1 | 101.87 | 0.8904 | 0.0364 | * |
| X7X1 | 4.78 | 1 | 4.78 | 0.0417 | 0.8415 | — |
| X7X2 | 30.59 | 1 | 30.59 | 0.2674 | 0.6145 | — |
| X5X1 | 82.73 | 1 | 82.73 | 0.7231 | 0.4118 | — |
| X5X2 | 49.36 | 1 | 49.36 | 0.4315 | 0.0507 | — |
| X1X2 | 116.65 | 1 | 116.65 | 1.02 | 0.3325 | — |
| X1² | 62.74 | 1 | 62.74 | 0.5484 | 0.4732 | — |
| X2² | 386.67 | 1 | 386.67 | 3.38 | 0.0099 | ** |
| X5² | 112.53 | 1 | 112.53 | 0.9836 | 0.3409 | — |
| X7² | 1149.42 | 1 | 1 149.42 | 10.05 | 0.0081 | ** |
| Residual | 1372.86 | 12 | 114.4 | |||
| Lack of fit | 1280.24 | 10 | 128.02 | 2.76 | 0.2948 | — |
| Pure error | 92.62 | 2 | 46.31 | |||
| Cor total | 13380.6 | 26 |
表5 响应面优化实验方差分析结果
Table 5 Analysis of variance results for response surface optimization experiments
| Source | Sum of squares | df | Mean square | F-value | P-value | Significance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 Adj. R2 | 0.8974 0.7777 | |||||
| Model | 12007.74 | 14 | 857.7 | 7.5 | 0.0006 | ** |
| X1 | 672.19 | 1 | 672.19 | 5.88 | 0.0321 | * |
| X2 | 2.08 | 1 | 2.08 | 0.0181 | 0.8951 | — |
| X5 | 515.47 | 1 | 515.47 | 4.51 | 0.0453 | * |
| X7 | 7898.35 | 1 | 7 898.35 | 69.04 | <0.0001 | ** |
| X7X5 | 101.87 | 1 | 101.87 | 0.8904 | 0.0364 | * |
| X7X1 | 4.78 | 1 | 4.78 | 0.0417 | 0.8415 | — |
| X7X2 | 30.59 | 1 | 30.59 | 0.2674 | 0.6145 | — |
| X5X1 | 82.73 | 1 | 82.73 | 0.7231 | 0.4118 | — |
| X5X2 | 49.36 | 1 | 49.36 | 0.4315 | 0.0507 | — |
| X1X2 | 116.65 | 1 | 116.65 | 1.02 | 0.3325 | — |
| X1² | 62.74 | 1 | 62.74 | 0.5484 | 0.4732 | — |
| X2² | 386.67 | 1 | 386.67 | 3.38 | 0.0099 | ** |
| X5² | 112.53 | 1 | 112.53 | 0.9836 | 0.3409 | — |
| X7² | 1149.42 | 1 | 1 149.42 | 10.05 | 0.0081 | ** |
| Residual | 1372.86 | 12 | 114.4 | |||
| Lack of fit | 1280.24 | 10 | 128.02 | 2.76 | 0.2948 | — |
| Pure error | 92.62 | 2 | 46.31 | |||
| Cor total | 13380.6 | 26 |
| Compound | Linear range/(μg/L) | R2 | LOD/ (μg/kg) | LOQ/ (μg/kg) | 1 μg/kg | 10 μg/kg | 100 μg/kg | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recovery/% | RSD/% | Recovery/% | RSD/% | Recovery/% | RSD/% | |||||
| CAPs | ||||||||||
| LV | 0.02-100 | 0.9969 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 85.2 | 8.3 | 82.4 | 6.9 | 88.7 | 5.2 |
| QNs | ||||||||||
| DIF | 0.1-100 | 0.9982 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 75.2 | 6.3 | 73.1 | 9.9 | 73.2 | 7.5 |
| LOM | 0.1-100 | 0.9952 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 71.2 | 2.4 | 82.6 | 5.8 | 98.0 | 10.8 |
| DAN | 0.1-100 | 0.9944 | 0.01 | 0.06 | 84.9 | 9.1 | 109.3 | 8.2 | 105.8 | 7.2 |
| ENR | 0.1-100 | 0.9994 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 84.4 | 7.6 | 86.7 | 5.3 | 91.6 | 5.8 |
| ORB | 0.1-100 | 0.9908 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 74.9 | 2.2 | 79.2 | 7.0 | 84.7 | 4.7 |
| GAT | 0.1-100 | 0.9960 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 70.4 | 3.7 | 81.1 | 8.5 | 86.3 | 2.3 |
| MAR | 0.1-100 | 0.9963 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 74.4 | 3.3 | 86.8 | 2.3 | 85.1 | 4.3 |
| ENO | 0.1-100 | 0.9949 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 71.7 | 3.4 | 98.8 | 4.8 | 100.7 | 4.9 |
| FLE | 0.1-100 | 0.9966 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 79.0 | 0.7 | 86.7 | 2.4 | 92.8 | 7.5 |
| NOR | 0.1-100 | 1.0000 | 0.03 | 0.08 | 72.8 | 4.0 | 101.3 | 3.8 | 103.9 | 4.6 |
| OFL | 0.1-100 | 0.9990 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 83.0 | 9.8 | 87.7 | 2.5 | 94.5 | 6.5 |
| PEF | 0.1-100 | 0.9992 | 0.01 | 0.04 | 103.7 | 5.4 | 102.0 | 5.6 | 101.6 | 6.2 |
| CIP | 0.1-100 | 1.0000 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 70.7 | 4.3 | 85.9 | 4.6 | 100.6 | 9.9 |
| SPA | 0.1-100 | 0.9993 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 73.2 | 7.5 | 81.3 | 5.9 | 91.8 | 2.4 |
| CIN | 0.1-100 | 0.9999 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 70.9 | 6.3 | 71.6 | 3.8 | 72.9 | 3.7 |
| OXO | 0.1-100 | 0.9913 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 72.0 | 8.9 | 73.8 | 1.4 | 91.3 | 7.9 |
| NAL | 0.1-100 | 0.9932 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 72.5 | 0.4 | 75.6 | 4.5 | 80.7 | 0.1 |
| FLU | 0.1-100 | 0.9914 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 70.5 | 9.2 | 77.3 | 0.9 | 86.2 | 1.6 |
| SAR | 0.1-100 | 0.9998 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 71.8 | 7.7 | 85.2 | 7.4 | 85.4 | 8.1 |
| SAs | ||||||||||
| SDZ | 0.1-200 | 1.0000 | 0.04 | 0.12 | 70.8 | 4.3 | 72.9 | 2.5 | 77.7 | 1.3 |
| STZ | 0.1-200 | 0.9979 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 71.1 | 2.8 | 80.4 | 0.8 | 79.8 | 0.7 |
| SPD | 0.1-200 | 0.9997 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 71.4 | 5.8 | 73.3 | 0.8 | 75.6 | 2.8 |
| SMR | 0.1-200 | 1.0000 | 0.02 | 0.06 | 75.6 | 2.8 | 73.8 | 1.2 | 84.7 | 0.8 |
| SME | 0.1-200 | 1.0000 | 0.01 | 0.04 | 72.7 | 3.2 | 76.0 | 2.5 | 82.6 | 1.7 |
| SMI | 0.1-200 | 0.9996 | 0.03 | 0.08 | 71.3 | 3.6 | 72.7 | 3.2 | 76.6 | 2.2 |
| SMA | 0.1-200 | 1.0000 | 0.02 | 0.05 | 75.4 | 4.3 | 76.8 | 0.8 | 81.9 | 1.2 |
| SMP | 0.1-200 | 0.9998 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 72.6 | 5.8 | 71.8 | 2.9 | 81.7 | 1.7 |
| SCP | 0.1-200 | 0.9977 | 0.03 | 0.09 | 72.2 | 4.0 | 74.1 | 1.8 | 82.0 | 0.9 |
| SMM | 0.1-200 | 0.9983 | 0.03 | 0.09 | 71.7 | 4.1 | 74.4 | 5.5 | 84.2 | 1.7 |
| SSZ | 0.1-200 | 0.9998 | 0.10 | 0.33 | 75.7 | 1.1 | 77.6 | 1.2 | 77.6 | 1.2 |
| SDX | 0.1-200 | 0.9999 | 0.02 | 0.06 | 71.7 | 2.7 | 74.2 | 0.8 | 82.2 | 0.3 |
| SMX | 0.1-200 | 0.9998 | 0.03 | 0.08 | 72.5 | 4.6 | 74.3 | 3.0 | 80.7 | 0.7 |
| SB | 0.1-200 | 1.0000 | 0.02 | 0.07 | 76.5 | 3.1 | 71.4 | 1.6 | 78.6 | 1.2 |
| SPZ | 0.1-200 | 1.0000 | 0.03 | 0.1 | 75.9 | 5.3 | 72.1 | 1.9 | 83.2 | 0.9 |
| SCZ | 0.1-200 | 0.9998 | 0.12 | 0.39 | 72.0 | 2.2 | 71.6 | 0.3 | 83.1 | 1.7 |
| SDM | 0.1-200 | 1.0000 | 0.02 | 0.05 | 70.5 | 1.2 | 70.5 | 1.2 | 83.4 | 0.4 |
| SQX | 0.1-200 | 0.9998 | 0.02 | 0.06 | 81.5 | 1.5 | 72.5 | 0.9 | 78.5 | 2.5 |
表6 蜂蜜中38种抗生素的线性关系、检出限、定量限以及不同水平下的回收率和RSD(n=3)
Table 6 Linear relationships, LODs, LOQs, recoveries and RSDs at different levels (n=3) of the 38 antibiotics in honey
| Compound | Linear range/(μg/L) | R2 | LOD/ (μg/kg) | LOQ/ (μg/kg) | 1 μg/kg | 10 μg/kg | 100 μg/kg | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recovery/% | RSD/% | Recovery/% | RSD/% | Recovery/% | RSD/% | |||||
| CAPs | ||||||||||
| LV | 0.02-100 | 0.9969 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 85.2 | 8.3 | 82.4 | 6.9 | 88.7 | 5.2 |
| QNs | ||||||||||
| DIF | 0.1-100 | 0.9982 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 75.2 | 6.3 | 73.1 | 9.9 | 73.2 | 7.5 |
| LOM | 0.1-100 | 0.9952 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 71.2 | 2.4 | 82.6 | 5.8 | 98.0 | 10.8 |
| DAN | 0.1-100 | 0.9944 | 0.01 | 0.06 | 84.9 | 9.1 | 109.3 | 8.2 | 105.8 | 7.2 |
| ENR | 0.1-100 | 0.9994 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 84.4 | 7.6 | 86.7 | 5.3 | 91.6 | 5.8 |
| ORB | 0.1-100 | 0.9908 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 74.9 | 2.2 | 79.2 | 7.0 | 84.7 | 4.7 |
| GAT | 0.1-100 | 0.9960 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 70.4 | 3.7 | 81.1 | 8.5 | 86.3 | 2.3 |
| MAR | 0.1-100 | 0.9963 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 74.4 | 3.3 | 86.8 | 2.3 | 85.1 | 4.3 |
| ENO | 0.1-100 | 0.9949 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 71.7 | 3.4 | 98.8 | 4.8 | 100.7 | 4.9 |
| FLE | 0.1-100 | 0.9966 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 79.0 | 0.7 | 86.7 | 2.4 | 92.8 | 7.5 |
| NOR | 0.1-100 | 1.0000 | 0.03 | 0.08 | 72.8 | 4.0 | 101.3 | 3.8 | 103.9 | 4.6 |
| OFL | 0.1-100 | 0.9990 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 83.0 | 9.8 | 87.7 | 2.5 | 94.5 | 6.5 |
| PEF | 0.1-100 | 0.9992 | 0.01 | 0.04 | 103.7 | 5.4 | 102.0 | 5.6 | 101.6 | 6.2 |
| CIP | 0.1-100 | 1.0000 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 70.7 | 4.3 | 85.9 | 4.6 | 100.6 | 9.9 |
| SPA | 0.1-100 | 0.9993 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 73.2 | 7.5 | 81.3 | 5.9 | 91.8 | 2.4 |
| CIN | 0.1-100 | 0.9999 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 70.9 | 6.3 | 71.6 | 3.8 | 72.9 | 3.7 |
| OXO | 0.1-100 | 0.9913 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 72.0 | 8.9 | 73.8 | 1.4 | 91.3 | 7.9 |
| NAL | 0.1-100 | 0.9932 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 72.5 | 0.4 | 75.6 | 4.5 | 80.7 | 0.1 |
| FLU | 0.1-100 | 0.9914 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 70.5 | 9.2 | 77.3 | 0.9 | 86.2 | 1.6 |
| SAR | 0.1-100 | 0.9998 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 71.8 | 7.7 | 85.2 | 7.4 | 85.4 | 8.1 |
| SAs | ||||||||||
| SDZ | 0.1-200 | 1.0000 | 0.04 | 0.12 | 70.8 | 4.3 | 72.9 | 2.5 | 77.7 | 1.3 |
| STZ | 0.1-200 | 0.9979 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 71.1 | 2.8 | 80.4 | 0.8 | 79.8 | 0.7 |
| SPD | 0.1-200 | 0.9997 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 71.4 | 5.8 | 73.3 | 0.8 | 75.6 | 2.8 |
| SMR | 0.1-200 | 1.0000 | 0.02 | 0.06 | 75.6 | 2.8 | 73.8 | 1.2 | 84.7 | 0.8 |
| SME | 0.1-200 | 1.0000 | 0.01 | 0.04 | 72.7 | 3.2 | 76.0 | 2.5 | 82.6 | 1.7 |
| SMI | 0.1-200 | 0.9996 | 0.03 | 0.08 | 71.3 | 3.6 | 72.7 | 3.2 | 76.6 | 2.2 |
| SMA | 0.1-200 | 1.0000 | 0.02 | 0.05 | 75.4 | 4.3 | 76.8 | 0.8 | 81.9 | 1.2 |
| SMP | 0.1-200 | 0.9998 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 72.6 | 5.8 | 71.8 | 2.9 | 81.7 | 1.7 |
| SCP | 0.1-200 | 0.9977 | 0.03 | 0.09 | 72.2 | 4.0 | 74.1 | 1.8 | 82.0 | 0.9 |
| SMM | 0.1-200 | 0.9983 | 0.03 | 0.09 | 71.7 | 4.1 | 74.4 | 5.5 | 84.2 | 1.7 |
| SSZ | 0.1-200 | 0.9998 | 0.10 | 0.33 | 75.7 | 1.1 | 77.6 | 1.2 | 77.6 | 1.2 |
| SDX | 0.1-200 | 0.9999 | 0.02 | 0.06 | 71.7 | 2.7 | 74.2 | 0.8 | 82.2 | 0.3 |
| SMX | 0.1-200 | 0.9998 | 0.03 | 0.08 | 72.5 | 4.6 | 74.3 | 3.0 | 80.7 | 0.7 |
| SB | 0.1-200 | 1.0000 | 0.02 | 0.07 | 76.5 | 3.1 | 71.4 | 1.6 | 78.6 | 1.2 |
| SPZ | 0.1-200 | 1.0000 | 0.03 | 0.1 | 75.9 | 5.3 | 72.1 | 1.9 | 83.2 | 0.9 |
| SCZ | 0.1-200 | 0.9998 | 0.12 | 0.39 | 72.0 | 2.2 | 71.6 | 0.3 | 83.1 | 1.7 |
| SDM | 0.1-200 | 1.0000 | 0.02 | 0.05 | 70.5 | 1.2 | 70.5 | 1.2 | 83.4 | 0.4 |
| SQX | 0.1-200 | 0.9998 | 0.02 | 0.06 | 81.5 | 1.5 | 72.5 | 0.9 | 78.5 | 2.5 |
图5 蜂蜜样品中氯霉素、喹诺酮类和磺胺类38种抗生素的总离子色谱图
Fig. 5 Total ion chromatogram of the 38 types of antibiotics including chloramphenicol, quinolones, and sulfonamides in a honey sample
| Compounds (quantity) | Pretreatment method | Determination/detection | LOD/(μg/kg) | LOQ/(μg/kg) | Recovery/% | AGREE assessment | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LV | LLE | LC-ESI-MS/MS | 0.10 | 0.30 | 106.70 | ![]() | [ |
| QNs (9) | 3.60-5.30 | 10.80-14.70 | 90.10-115.80 | ||||
| SAs (17) | 1.90-9.20 | 9.90-27.60 | 77.40-105.60 | ||||
| QNs (9) | QuEChERS | UHPLC-MS/MS | 0.29-3.67 | 0.25-2.50 | 96.60-104.70 | ![]() | [ |
| SAs (21) | 0.13-3.26 | 0.10-2.50 | 94.20-103.40 | ||||
| QNs (11) | SPE | LC-MS/MS | 5.00 | 10.00 | 93.80-114.00 | ![]() | [ |
| SAs (11) | 94.40-110.30 | ||||||
| SAs (4) | MDSPE | HPLC-DAD | 0.38-0.48 | 1.14-1.79 | — | ![]() | [ |
| LV | MDSPE | HPLC-MS/MS | 0.01 | 0.03 | 85.20-88.70 | ![]() | this work |
| QNs (17) | 0.01-0.03 | 0.02-0.08 | 70.50-109.30 | ||||
| SAs (18) | 0.01-0.12 | 0.03-0.39 | 70.50-84.70 |
表7 该方法与文献中蜂蜜中抗生素残留检测方法的对比
Table 7 Comparison of this method with other reported methods for detecting antibiotic residues in honey
| Compounds (quantity) | Pretreatment method | Determination/detection | LOD/(μg/kg) | LOQ/(μg/kg) | Recovery/% | AGREE assessment | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LV | LLE | LC-ESI-MS/MS | 0.10 | 0.30 | 106.70 | ![]() | [ |
| QNs (9) | 3.60-5.30 | 10.80-14.70 | 90.10-115.80 | ||||
| SAs (17) | 1.90-9.20 | 9.90-27.60 | 77.40-105.60 | ||||
| QNs (9) | QuEChERS | UHPLC-MS/MS | 0.29-3.67 | 0.25-2.50 | 96.60-104.70 | ![]() | [ |
| SAs (21) | 0.13-3.26 | 0.10-2.50 | 94.20-103.40 | ||||
| QNs (11) | SPE | LC-MS/MS | 5.00 | 10.00 | 93.80-114.00 | ![]() | [ |
| SAs (11) | 94.40-110.30 | ||||||
| SAs (4) | MDSPE | HPLC-DAD | 0.38-0.48 | 1.14-1.79 | — | ![]() | [ |
| LV | MDSPE | HPLC-MS/MS | 0.01 | 0.03 | 85.20-88.70 | ![]() | this work |
| QNs (17) | 0.01-0.03 | 0.02-0.08 | 70.50-109.30 | ||||
| SAs (18) | 0.01-0.12 | 0.03-0.39 | 70.50-84.70 |
|
| [1] | 徐锐洺, 吴友谊, 顾智灏, 魏唯, 陆星宇, 夏紫菡. 基于低共熔溶剂和改进针式滤头的液膜微萃取结合高效液相色谱法测定牛奶中磺胺与氟喹诺酮残留[J]. 色谱, 2026, 44(4): 422-431. |
| [2] | 李慧, 任耿標, 李慧娟, 陈相峰, 张志国, 赵燕芳. 亚胺连接的多孔共价有机骨架材料结合固相萃取-液相色谱-串联质谱检测蜂蜜中雌激素[J]. 色谱, 2022, 40(8): 704-711. |
| [3] | 侯建波, 谢文, 钱艳, 史颖珠, 陆顺, 盛涛, 陈文彬. 固相萃取-液相色谱-串联质谱法同时测定蜂蜜中16种黄酮类化合物和阿魏酸[J]. 色谱, 2020, 38(5): 529-537. |
| [4] | 魏莉莉, 薛霞, 刘艳明, 孙立臻, 程志, 宿书芳, 赵寅. 亲水作用色谱-串联质谱法测定蜂蜜中链霉素和双氢链霉素残留[J]. 色谱, 2019, 37(7): 735-741. |
| [5] | 严丽娟, 徐敦明, 薛晓锋, 林立毅, 赖康, 王建文, 张志刚. 基于液相色谱-高分辨质谱的代谢组学技术用于麦卢卡蜂蜜的甄别[J]. 色谱, 2019, 37(6): 589-596. |
| [6] | 吴云辉, 严丽娟, 沈鹭英, 林立毅, 张峰, 徐敦明. 混合型离子交换液相色谱-串联质谱法测定蜂蜜中5种氨基糖苷类抗生素残留[J]. 色谱, 2019, 37(5): 499-504. |
| [7] | 朱之烔, 柳菡, 宁倩倩, 张健, 沈伟健, 陈惠兰, 沈崇钰, 谢文. 高效液相色谱-串联质谱法测定蜂蜜中9种农药残留[J]. 色谱, 2019, 37(1): 8-14. |
| [8] | 杨雯筌, 张晓燕, 姚倩, 周杨娟, 胡亚文, 王茂华, 唐茂芝. 液相色谱-串联质谱法检测雄蜂蛹粉中50种抗生素残留[J]. 色谱, 2019, 37(1): 46-53. |
| [9] | 孙佳佳, 章飞芳, 梁鑫淼. 螺旋霉素分子印迹磁性纳米吸附剂的合成及应用[J]. 色谱, 2018, 36(8): 723-729. |
| [10] | 周少丹, 唐嘉琦, 贾博, 吕运开. 表面接枝亲水性聚合物刷磁性微球的制备及其对蜂蜜中四环素类抗生素残留的磁分散固相萃取[J]. 色谱, 2018, 36(2): 85-93. |
| [11] | 李帅, 陈辉, 金铃和, 彭涛, 范春林, 王明林. 高效液相色谱-串联质谱法测定蜂蜜中20种全氟烷基化合物[J]. 色谱, 2017, 35(5): 495-501. |
| [12] | 沈崇钰, 郭思言, 丁涛, 刘芸, 陈磊, 费晓庆, 张睿, 吴斌, 沈伟健, 陈雷, 张峰, 冯峰, 邓晓军, 伊雄海, 杨功俊, 陈国强. 全自动在线固相萃取-液相色谱-高分辨质谱法测定麦卢卡蜂蜜中的特征标志物[J]. 色谱, 2017, 35(10): 1068-1072. |
| [13] | 殷耀, 陈恵兰, 陈磊, 别小妹, 丁涛, 张晓燕, 吴斌, 沈崇钰, 张睿. 超高效液相色谱-高分辨质谱法测定蜂蜜中的3种马桑内酯[J]. 色谱, 2015, 33(7): 711-714. |
| [14] | 姚伟宣, 应剑波, 张素玲, 张春晓, 王海栋, 蔡国栋. Fe3O4纳米粒子修饰多壁碳纳米管的制备及在水和蜂蜜样品中痕量菊酯类农药分析中的应用[J]. 色谱, 2015, 33(4): 342-347. |
| [15] | 雷美康, 彭芳, 丁涛, 祝子铜, 徐佳文, 吴晓勤. 固相萃取净化-超高效液相色谱-串联质谱法测定蜂蜜中雷公藤次碱[J]. 色谱, 2015, 33(1): 65-67. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||