色谱 ›› 2026, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (9): 1001-1009.DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1123.2025.12017

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

(2-羟乙基)-β-环糊精键合表面多孔和全多孔颗粒手性固定相在超临界流体色谱和反相液相色谱中的手性分离性能比较

杨光勇*(), 吴海江, 张煌涛, 王洪礼, 梁秋艳   

  1. 新疆维吾尔自治区质量基础发展研究院,新疆 乌鲁木齐 830011
  • 收稿日期:2025-12-18 出版日期:2026-09-08 发布日期:2026-09-17
  • 通讯作者: *Tel:0991-3757654,E-mail:314808113@qq.com.
  • 基金资助:
    国家市场监督管理总局科技计划项目(2024MK140)

Comparison of chiral separation performance of (2-hydroxyethyl-β)-cyclodextrin bonded superficially porous and fully porous particle chiral stationary phases in supercritical fluid chromatography and reversed-phase liquid chromatography

YANG Guangyong*(), WU Haijiang, ZHANG Huangtao, WANG Hongli, LIANG Qiuyan   

  1. Research Institute for Basic Quality Development of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region,Urumqi 830011,China
  • Received:2025-12-18 Online:2026-09-08 Published:2026-09-17
  • Supported by:
    Research Project of the State Administration for Market Regulation(2024MK140)

摘要:

使用紫外线和过氧化氢溶液去除失效色谱柱中硅胶填料表面的键合相,从而获得亚3 μm再生表面多孔颗粒(SPP)。将(2-羟乙基)-β-环糊精键合到再生SPP和3 μm商品化全多孔颗粒(FPP)表面,制备了基于亚3 μm SPP和3 μm FPP的手性固定相(SPP-CSP和FPP-CSP)。以外消旋佐匹克隆等10种分析物为手性分子探针,测试了两种CSP在超临界流体色谱(SFC)和反相液相色谱(RPLC)模式下的手性分离性能。结果表明,在相同的色谱模式及色谱条件下,与FPP-CSP相比,分析物对映体在SPP-CSP中的分离度更高,并且可以获得更尖锐的色谱峰形、更短的保留时间和更高的理论塔板数。当通过改变色谱条件获得相同分析时间时,FPP-CSP出现了显著的分离度损失,而SPP-CSP在提高流速以进一步缩短分析时间时,其分离度受到的负面影响较小,这为超快速手性分离提供了可能。SFC与RPLC表现出互补的手性识别范围,但在两者共同有效的分离范围内,SFC产生了更高的对映体分离度和更好的色谱性能。此外,流动相组成(尤其是添加剂种类)以及分析物自身的立体结构,都会影响对映体的分离效果。与相同粒径和颗粒结构的商品化(2-羟丙基)-β-环糊精(Hp-β-CD)手性色谱柱相比,所制备的SPP-CSP表现出独特的选择性,且该选择性随着色谱模式的改变而改变。然而,在被考察的两种色谱模式下,与商品化Hp-β-CD手性色谱柱相比,所制备SPP-CSP中分析物的色谱峰对称性较差,理论塔板数也较低。

关键词: 表面多孔颗粒, 全多孔颗粒, 手性固定相, 超临界流体色谱, 反相液相色谱

Abstract:

Chromatography remains a cornerstone technique in analyzing chiral compounds. The development and selection of chiral stationary phases (CSPs) are central to achieving high-resolution enantiomeric separation. This study presents a novel regeneration and functionalization strategy for the preparation of high-performance superficially porous particle (SPP)-CSP, offering a promising alternative to conventional fully porous particle (FPP)-CSP. First, bonded phases on the surface of spent chromatographic column silica packing materials were removed using ultraviolet light (λ=254 nm) and hydrogen peroxide solution (3%, mass fraction), thereby obtaining sub-3 μm regenerated SPP. The regenerated SPP were then amino-functionalized. Subsequently, under mild reaction conditions, carbonyldiimidazole-activated (2-hydroxyethyl)-β-cyclodextrin (HE-β-CD) was bonded onto the surface of the amino-functionalized SPP to prepare the SPP-CSP. For comparative evaluation, a CSP based on 3 μm commercial FPPs was prepared. Additionally, a commercial (2-hydroxypropyl)-β-cyclodextrin (Hp-β-CD) chiral column with identical particle size and structure was selected as a reference. This commercial column was used to investigate the selectivity differences among different cyclodextrin derivatives. The enantioseparation and overall chromatographic performance of the CSPs were systematically evaluated under both supercritical fluid chromatography (SFC) and reversed-phase liquid chromatography (RPLC) modes. The evaluation was performed using ten chiral molecular probes: zopiclone, equol, 2-phenylpropionic acid, dobutamine, flutriafol, miconazole, folic acid, catechin, valacyclovir, and chlorphenamine. Results revealed that, under identical chromatographic conditions, the SPP-CSP consistently outperformed the FPP-CSP in terms of enantiomeric resolution, peak sharpness, theoretical plate number, and retention time efficiency. More importantly, the FPP-CSP exhibited a significant loss in resolution when chromatographic conditions were altered to yield equivalent analysis times. In contrast, the SPP-CSP showed only minor adverse effects on resolution when the flow rate was increased to shorten analysis time, highlighting its inherent suitability for ultrafast separations. Moreover, SFC and RPLC modes displayed complementary chiral recognition ranges. Within the overlapping separation scope of both modes, SFC mode achieved higher enantiomeric resolution and superior chromatographic performance. Notably, under RPLC mode, catechin showed high enantiomeric resolution on both CSPs, underscoring system-dependent selectivity differences. Multiple factors—including mobile phase composition (particularly the additive type), and the stereochemical structure of the analytes—were found to significantly influence enantioseparation outcomes. Under SFC mode, none of the analytes could be eluted when acetonitrile was used as the mobile phase modifier, whereas alcohols effectively enabled elution, with weaker hydrophobicity correlating to stronger elution strength. Among the alcohols tested, methanol offered distinct advantages over isopropanol by maintaining lower backpressure and superior chromatographic performance without compromising resolution. Under RPLC mode, although isopropanol as a mobile phase component provided higher enantiomeric resolution, it resulted in relatively poorer chromatographic performance and higher column pressure drop. Using acetonitrile offered limited flexibility in adjusting elution strength. In both chromatographic modes, the influence trends of mobile phase additives on enantioseparation performance and overall column performance were generally consistent. Mobile phases with acidic additives were more suitable for analyzing acidic analytes such as 2-phenylpropionic acid and folic acid. Mobile phases with ammonium formate were better suited for analyzing basic analytes like chlorphenamine and flutriafol, as well as analytes with pKa values near 7, such as zopiclone. In contrast, NH3 as an additive yielded unsatisfactory results. Compared with the commercial Hp-β-CD chiral column of the same particle size and structure, the SPP-CSP exhibited different selectivity, which varied with the chromatographic mode. Under RPLC mode, the SPP-CSP showed higher resolution for zopiclone, dobutamine, and folic acid. Under SFC mode, it demonstrated higher resolution for equol, folic acid, and valacyclovir. Despite these advances, the study has certain limitations. To enhance compatibility with mass spectrometric detection, normal-phase mode was not investigated. Additives commonly used in chiral compound analysis, such as triethylamine and ammonium trifluoroacetate, were also not employed. Polar organic solvent mode was not investigated either. Additionally, peak symmetry and theoretical plate numbers on the SPP-CSP were generally inferior to those observed on the commercial Hp-β-CD chiral column across both chromatographic modes.

Key words: superficially porous particles, fully porous particles, chiral stationary phase, supercritical fluid chromatography (SFC), reversed-phase liquid chromatography (RPLC)

中图分类号: