色谱 ›› 2025, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (8): 868-880.DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1123.2025.01017
程嘉雯1,*(
), 朱家顺1, 刘雅静2, 华静3, 李爽4,*(
)
收稿日期:2025-01-13
出版日期:2025-08-08
发布日期:2025-07-28
通讯作者:
E-mail:chengjiawen@doublestar.com.cn(程嘉雯);E-mail:lishuang@qut.edu.cn(李爽).
基金资助:
CHENG Jiawen1,*(
), ZHU Jiashun1, LIU Yajing2, HUA Jing3, LI Shuang4,*(
)
Received:2025-01-13
Online:2025-08-08
Published:2025-07-28
Supported by:摘要:
对苯二胺类化合物(PPDs)以其优异的抗氧化和抗臭氧性能成为橡胶工业中重要的抗老化添加剂。但其在使用与释放过程中形成的醌类转化产物(PPD-Qs)具有潜在的环境风险与生态毒性。PPDs及PPD-Qs已在空气、水体、沉积物和生物体等多种介质中检出,且通常浓度低,反应活性高,易受复杂基质干扰,给准确定量带来挑战。本文系统梳理了PPDs及PPD-Qs在不同类型样品中的分析检测方法研究进展,涵盖气态、液态与固态等多种介质的样品前处理与检测策略。在气态样品中,滤膜采样与溶剂洗脱流程有助于目标物的有效富集与干扰去除;对于液态样品,固相萃取(SPE)技术显著提升PPDs及PPD-Qs的富集效率并降低基质效应;固态/半固态样品(如沉积物和海产品)的分析中,超声辅助萃取(UAE)结合净化策略则展现出对痕量目标物的优异萃取能力。仪器检测方面,色谱-质谱联用技术凭借其高分辨率和高灵敏度已成为主流手段,可实现PPDs及PPD-Qs的高效识别与准确定量;电化学传感技术则在快速响应与便携监测方面展现出良好的应用前景。本文综合评估了各类分析策略的适用性与技术优势,为PPDs类污染物的检测方法优化与应用提供了理论依据和技术支持。
中图分类号:
程嘉雯, 朱家顺, 刘雅静, 华静, 李爽. 对苯二胺类橡胶防老剂及其醌类转化产物分析方法研究进展[J]. 色谱, 2025, 43(8): 868-880.
CHENG Jiawen, ZHU Jiashun, LIU Yajing, HUA Jing, LI Shuang. Research progress on analytical methods for the determination of p-phenylenediamine-based rubber antioxidants and their quinone transformation products[J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2025, 43(8): 868-880.
![]() |
表 1 常见PPDs及PPD-Qs的结构式及其物化性质
Table 1 Structural formulas and physicochemical properties of common p-phenylenediamines and p-phenylenediamines-quinone(PPDs and PPD-Qs)
![]() |
图3 抗氧化剂保护-盐析辅助萃取-多滤柱过滤分析水产品中PPDs及PPD-Qs的流程图[63]
Fig. 3 Flowchart of antioxidant-protected salt-out assisted extraction combined with multi-plug filtration clean-up for the analysis of PPDs and PPD-Qs in aquatic products[63]
| Sample | Analytes | Extraction method | Extraction/elution solvent | LOD | Recovery/% | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Air | IPPD, DPPD, CPPD, 6PPD, DNPD, 77PD and 6PPD-Q | UAE | ACN, DCM/HEX(1∶1, v/v) | 0.3-75 pg/mL | 84-110 | [ |
| Air | IPPD, DPPD, CPPD, 6PPD, and 6PPD-Q | ASE | PE/ACE (83∶17, v/v) | 0.169-2.71 pg/m3(LOQ) | - | [ |
| Air particulate | IPPD, DPPD, CPPD, 6PPD, DTPD, 77PD, 7PPD, 8PPD, 66PD, IPPD-Q, DPPD-Q, CPPD-Q, 6PPD-Q, DTPD-Q, 77PD-Q, 7PPD-Q, 8PPD-Q and 66PD-Q | UAE | DCN and ACE | 0.078-0.602 pg/m3 | 67-94 | [ |
| Atmospheric particles | IPPD, DPPD, CPPD, 6PPD, DTPD, IPPD-Q, DPPD-Q, CPPD-Q, 6PPD-Q and DTPD-Q | UAE | DCN and ACE | 0.019-0.296 ng/mL(IQL) | 74-96 | [ |
| Dust | IPPD, DPPD, CPPD, 6PPD, DNPD, IPPD-Q, DPPD-Q, CPPD-Q and 6PPD-Q | UAE | ACN, DCM/HEX(1∶1, v/v) | 0.05-0.35 ng/g(LOQ) | 71-105 | [ |
| Dust | IPPD, DPPD, CPPD, 6PPD, DNPD, and 77PD | UAE | ACN, DCN/HEX(1∶1, v/v) | 0.11-2.35 ng/g(LOQ) | 71-103 | [ |
| Water | 6PPD-Q | SPE | MeOH and DCM | 1.2 ng/mL | 70-88 | [ |
Urban runoff water | IPPD, DPPD, CPPD, 6PPD, DTPD, IPPD-Q, DPPD-Q, CPPD-Q, 6PPD-Q and DTPD-Q | SPE | MeOH/DCN (1∶9, v/v) | 0.019-0.296 ng/mL(IQL) | 73-93 | [ |
| Urine | 6PPD and 6PPD-Q | SALLE | ACN | 0.012-0.021 ng/mL | 62-65 | [ |
| Urine | IPPD-Q, DPPD-Q, CPPD-Q, 6PPD-Q, and DTPD-Q | LLE | DCM and ammonia | 2.4-7.5 pg/mL | 80.5-114 | [ |
| Soil | IPPD, DPPD, CPPD, 6PPD, DTPD, IPPD-Q, DPPD-Q, CPPD-Q, 6PPD-Q and DTPD-Q | UAE | DCM and ACN | 0.019-0.296 ng/mL(IQL) | 70-113 | [ |
| Soil | IPPD, DPPD, CPPD, 6PPD, DTPD, 77PD, 7PPD, 8PPD, 66PD, IPPD-Q, DPPD-Q, CPPD-Q, 6PPD-Q, DTPD-Q, 77PD-Q, 7PPD-Q, 8PPD-Q and 66PD-Q | UAE | DCN and ACE | 0.10-0.77 ng/g | 64-105 | [ |
| Soil | IPPD, DPPD, CPPD, 6PPD, DNPD, 77PD and 6PPD-Q | UAE and GPC | UAE: ACE; GPC: DCM | 0.24-2.29 ng/g | 82.87-100.57 | [ |
| Honey and fish | 6PPD and 6PPD-Q | QuEChERS | ACN | 0.00025-0.0003 mg/kg | 73.3-108.3 | [ |
Zebrafish Embryos | IPPD, CPPD, 6PPD, and DTPD | UAE and PSA purified | DCM | 0.38-0.68 ng/g | 73.1-225 | [ |
| Tire tissue | IPPD, DPPD, CPPD, 6PPD, DTPD, 77PD, 7PPD, 8PPD, 66PD, IPPD-Q, DPPD-Q, CPPD-Q, 6PPD-Q, DTPD-Q, 77PD-Q, 7PPD-Q, 8PPD-Q and 66PD-Q | UAE | DCN and ACE | 0.002-0.018 µg/g | 72-117 | [ |
表 2 复杂基质中PPDs及PPD-Qs的样品前处理方法
Table 2 Sample pretreatment methods for PPDs and PPD-Qs in complex matrices
| Sample | Analytes | Extraction method | Extraction/elution solvent | LOD | Recovery/% | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Air | IPPD, DPPD, CPPD, 6PPD, DNPD, 77PD and 6PPD-Q | UAE | ACN, DCM/HEX(1∶1, v/v) | 0.3-75 pg/mL | 84-110 | [ |
| Air | IPPD, DPPD, CPPD, 6PPD, and 6PPD-Q | ASE | PE/ACE (83∶17, v/v) | 0.169-2.71 pg/m3(LOQ) | - | [ |
| Air particulate | IPPD, DPPD, CPPD, 6PPD, DTPD, 77PD, 7PPD, 8PPD, 66PD, IPPD-Q, DPPD-Q, CPPD-Q, 6PPD-Q, DTPD-Q, 77PD-Q, 7PPD-Q, 8PPD-Q and 66PD-Q | UAE | DCN and ACE | 0.078-0.602 pg/m3 | 67-94 | [ |
| Atmospheric particles | IPPD, DPPD, CPPD, 6PPD, DTPD, IPPD-Q, DPPD-Q, CPPD-Q, 6PPD-Q and DTPD-Q | UAE | DCN and ACE | 0.019-0.296 ng/mL(IQL) | 74-96 | [ |
| Dust | IPPD, DPPD, CPPD, 6PPD, DNPD, IPPD-Q, DPPD-Q, CPPD-Q and 6PPD-Q | UAE | ACN, DCM/HEX(1∶1, v/v) | 0.05-0.35 ng/g(LOQ) | 71-105 | [ |
| Dust | IPPD, DPPD, CPPD, 6PPD, DNPD, and 77PD | UAE | ACN, DCN/HEX(1∶1, v/v) | 0.11-2.35 ng/g(LOQ) | 71-103 | [ |
| Water | 6PPD-Q | SPE | MeOH and DCM | 1.2 ng/mL | 70-88 | [ |
Urban runoff water | IPPD, DPPD, CPPD, 6PPD, DTPD, IPPD-Q, DPPD-Q, CPPD-Q, 6PPD-Q and DTPD-Q | SPE | MeOH/DCN (1∶9, v/v) | 0.019-0.296 ng/mL(IQL) | 73-93 | [ |
| Urine | 6PPD and 6PPD-Q | SALLE | ACN | 0.012-0.021 ng/mL | 62-65 | [ |
| Urine | IPPD-Q, DPPD-Q, CPPD-Q, 6PPD-Q, and DTPD-Q | LLE | DCM and ammonia | 2.4-7.5 pg/mL | 80.5-114 | [ |
| Soil | IPPD, DPPD, CPPD, 6PPD, DTPD, IPPD-Q, DPPD-Q, CPPD-Q, 6PPD-Q and DTPD-Q | UAE | DCM and ACN | 0.019-0.296 ng/mL(IQL) | 70-113 | [ |
| Soil | IPPD, DPPD, CPPD, 6PPD, DTPD, 77PD, 7PPD, 8PPD, 66PD, IPPD-Q, DPPD-Q, CPPD-Q, 6PPD-Q, DTPD-Q, 77PD-Q, 7PPD-Q, 8PPD-Q and 66PD-Q | UAE | DCN and ACE | 0.10-0.77 ng/g | 64-105 | [ |
| Soil | IPPD, DPPD, CPPD, 6PPD, DNPD, 77PD and 6PPD-Q | UAE and GPC | UAE: ACE; GPC: DCM | 0.24-2.29 ng/g | 82.87-100.57 | [ |
| Honey and fish | 6PPD and 6PPD-Q | QuEChERS | ACN | 0.00025-0.0003 mg/kg | 73.3-108.3 | [ |
Zebrafish Embryos | IPPD, CPPD, 6PPD, and DTPD | UAE and PSA purified | DCM | 0.38-0.68 ng/g | 73.1-225 | [ |
| Tire tissue | IPPD, DPPD, CPPD, 6PPD, DTPD, 77PD, 7PPD, 8PPD, 66PD, IPPD-Q, DPPD-Q, CPPD-Q, 6PPD-Q, DTPD-Q, 77PD-Q, 7PPD-Q, 8PPD-Q and 66PD-Q | UAE | DCN and ACE | 0.002-0.018 µg/g | 72-117 | [ |
图4 水中的6PPD经模拟日光照射后6PPD-OH和6PPD-(OH)2的检出结果[34]
Fig. 4 Identification of 6PPD-OH and 6PPD-(OH)2 in aqueous solution containing 6PPD treated with simulated sunlight irradiation[34]
Pretreatment/ detection technique | Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|---|
| LLE | simple, versatile, effective for large sample volumes and low equipment cost | high solvent consumption, emulsification issues, incomplete phase separation, time-consuming and limited selectivity |
| SALLE | enhanced phase separation, lower organic solvent consumption, improved recovery for hydrophilic compounds and reduced risk of emulsion formation | limited applicability to non-polar compounds, potential analyte loss due to salt interactions, optimized salt selection required and limited compatibility with certain organic solvents |
| SPE | enhanced selectivity and purification, higher concentration and sensitivity, automation compatibility and time efficiency | limited sample capacity, complex method optimization and risk of cartridge blockage |
| UAE | simple, faster extraction time, lower solvent consumption and broad applicability to various matrices | potential degradation of sensitive compounds, limited selectivity and interference from solid particles |
| GPC | efficient molecular size separation, minimal analyte interaction and high reproducibility and precision | high solvent consumption, limited compatibility with highly polar or ionic compounds and time-consuming |
| ASE | higher extraction efficiency, significant time savings, automation and high throughput | high initial equipment cost, limited suitability for heat-sensitive compounds and potential for co-extraction of undesired compounds |
| QuEChERS | minimal equipment requirement, simple and rapid procedure, minimal sample preparation required and high matrix compatibility | limited selectivity, not suitable for all analytes, inconsistent performance for highly lipophilic compounds and need for additional sample cleanup in protein-rich or highly pigmented samples |
| GC-MS | strong separation capability, capable of analyzing thermally stable and non-polar compounds | limited to volatile and thermally stable compounds, derivatization may be required and limited ability to analyze aqueous samples directly |
| LC-MS | compatible with complex and biological samples, wide range of ionization techniques and capable of analyzing large biomolecules | matrix effects and ion suppression, solvent and additive compatibility limitations, not ideal for highly volatile compounds |
| HRMS | high mass accuracy and resolution, superior identification of unknown compounds and versatile ionization and coupling options | high instrumentation cost, complex data processing and interpretation, limited availability of reference databases and challenges in ion suppression and matrix effects |
| EC | simple and rapid analysis, non-destructive testing, cost-effective and low maintenance | interference from multiple ion types,requires calibration and maintenance,limited sensitivity for low-ionic-strength samples and electrode fouling in certain applications |
表3 PPDs及PPD-Qs的样品前处理及仪器检测方法优缺点总结
Table 3 Summary of the advantages and disadvantages of sample preparation methods and instrumental detection techniques of PPDs and PPD-Qs
Pretreatment/ detection technique | Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|---|
| LLE | simple, versatile, effective for large sample volumes and low equipment cost | high solvent consumption, emulsification issues, incomplete phase separation, time-consuming and limited selectivity |
| SALLE | enhanced phase separation, lower organic solvent consumption, improved recovery for hydrophilic compounds and reduced risk of emulsion formation | limited applicability to non-polar compounds, potential analyte loss due to salt interactions, optimized salt selection required and limited compatibility with certain organic solvents |
| SPE | enhanced selectivity and purification, higher concentration and sensitivity, automation compatibility and time efficiency | limited sample capacity, complex method optimization and risk of cartridge blockage |
| UAE | simple, faster extraction time, lower solvent consumption and broad applicability to various matrices | potential degradation of sensitive compounds, limited selectivity and interference from solid particles |
| GPC | efficient molecular size separation, minimal analyte interaction and high reproducibility and precision | high solvent consumption, limited compatibility with highly polar or ionic compounds and time-consuming |
| ASE | higher extraction efficiency, significant time savings, automation and high throughput | high initial equipment cost, limited suitability for heat-sensitive compounds and potential for co-extraction of undesired compounds |
| QuEChERS | minimal equipment requirement, simple and rapid procedure, minimal sample preparation required and high matrix compatibility | limited selectivity, not suitable for all analytes, inconsistent performance for highly lipophilic compounds and need for additional sample cleanup in protein-rich or highly pigmented samples |
| GC-MS | strong separation capability, capable of analyzing thermally stable and non-polar compounds | limited to volatile and thermally stable compounds, derivatization may be required and limited ability to analyze aqueous samples directly |
| LC-MS | compatible with complex and biological samples, wide range of ionization techniques and capable of analyzing large biomolecules | matrix effects and ion suppression, solvent and additive compatibility limitations, not ideal for highly volatile compounds |
| HRMS | high mass accuracy and resolution, superior identification of unknown compounds and versatile ionization and coupling options | high instrumentation cost, complex data processing and interpretation, limited availability of reference databases and challenges in ion suppression and matrix effects |
| EC | simple and rapid analysis, non-destructive testing, cost-effective and low maintenance | interference from multiple ion types,requires calibration and maintenance,limited sensitivity for low-ionic-strength samples and electrode fouling in certain applications |
|
| [1] | 骆娅娜, 陈珈, 胡宇宇, 高世杰, 王艳丽, 刘艳明, 冯娟娟, 孙敏. 磁增强管内固相微萃取的材料制备及应用进展[J]. 色谱, 2025, 43(6): 606-619. |
| [2] | 吴恩慧, 乔亮. 微生物宏蛋白质组——从样品处理、数据采集到数据分析[J]. 色谱, 2024, 42(7): 658-668. |
| [3] | 康晶燕, 师彦平. 基于超分子衍生类多孔有机聚合物的样品前处理方法研究进展[J]. 色谱, 2024, 42(6): 496-507. |
| [4] | 曲健, 倪余文, 于浩然, 田洪旭, 王龙星, 陈吉平. 土壤中石油烃检测的前处理新方法:硅胶脱水-环己烷提取[J]. 色谱, 2023, 41(9): 814-820. |
| [5] | 刘威, 贾冬雪, 连文慧, 赵雨. 金属有机框架分子印迹材料的应用进展[J]. 色谱, 2023, 41(8): 651-661. |
| [6] | 高祎阳, 丁亚丽, 陈鲁玉, 杜芳, 辛绪波, 冯娟娟, 孙明霞, 冯洋, 孙敏. 共价有机框架材料在固相萃取中的最新应用进展[J]. 色谱, 2023, 41(7): 545-553. |
| [7] | 王雪梅, 黄丽霞, 袁娜, 黄鹏飞, 杜新贞, 卢小泉. 中空纳米材料的制备及其在样品前处理中的应用进展[J]. 色谱, 2023, 41(6): 457-471. |
| [8] | 叶翰章, 刘婷婷, 丁永立, 顾婧婧, 李宇浩, 王琪, 张占恩, 王学东. 泡腾辅助微萃取技术的开发与应用研究进展[J]. 色谱, 2023, 41(4): 289-301. |
| [9] | 余涛, 陈立, 张文敏, 张兰, 卢巧梅. 微孔有机网络材料的合成方法及其在样品前处理中的应用进展[J]. 色谱, 2023, 41(12): 1052-1061. |
| [10] | 商伟伟, 索德成, 李桐, 杜秋玲, 蒋先鸿, 王培龙. 金属有机框架材料UiO-67富集净化牛奶中孕激素残留[J]. 色谱, 2022, 40(8): 712-720. |
| [11] | 袁红梅, 卢泽毅, 李玉凰, 张成江, 李攻科. 亚胺类共价有机骨架材料在样品前处理中的应用[J]. 色谱, 2022, 40(2): 109-122. |
| [12] | 冯娟娟, 孙明霞, 冯洋, 辛绪波, 丁亚丽, 孙敏. 石墨烯应用于样品前处理的研究进展[J]. 色谱, 2022, 40(11): 953-965. |
| [13] | 程嘉雯, 马继平, 李爽, 田永. 六溴环十二烷的样品前处理和检测方法研究进展[J]. 色谱, 2022, 40(10): 872-881. |
| [14] | 孙敏, 李春英, 孙明霞, 冯洋, 冯加庆, 孙海丽, 冯娟娟. 氧化石墨烯功能化三聚氰胺-甲醛气凝胶涂层固相微萃取管的制备及其应用[J]. 色谱, 2022, 40(10): 889-899. |
| [15] | 李婷, 常蒙蒙, 石先哲, 许国旺. 分子印迹聚合物在极性农药残留检测中的应用进展[J]. 色谱, 2021, 39(9): 930-940. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||