Chinese Journal of Chromatography ›› 2021, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (10): 1065-1076.DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1123.2021.06017
• Reviews • Previous Articles Next Articles
YANG Sandong1, LI Naijie2, MA Zhou2, TANG Tao2, LI Tong2,3,*()
Received:
2021-06-09
Online:
2021-10-08
Published:
2021-09-10
Contact:
LI Tong
Supported by:
Fig. 1 Schematics of active flow-splitting systems a. based on pressure feedback; b. based on flow rate feedback; c. electro-magnetic proportional valve (EMPV) flow-splitting system based on flow rate feedback.
Pump type | Advantages | Disadvantages |
---|---|---|
Syringe pump | compact structure, stable during experiment, no check valve in pump head, convenient maintenance | limited delivery time due to pump cavity, inevitable system equilibrating procedure before every analysis |
Continuous flow pump | no limit to delivery time, fast equilibration between continuous experiments | complex structure and control algorithm, higher failure rate caused by multiple check valves |
Table 1 Advantages and disadvantages of the two types of splitless nanoliter pumps
Pump type | Advantages | Disadvantages |
---|---|---|
Syringe pump | compact structure, stable during experiment, no check valve in pump head, convenient maintenance | limited delivery time due to pump cavity, inevitable system equilibrating procedure before every analysis |
Continuous flow pump | no limit to delivery time, fast equilibration between continuous experiments | complex structure and control algorithm, higher failure rate caused by multiple check valves |
Type | Driving principle | Flow rate range/ (nL/min) | Maximum pressure/ MPa | Continuous delivery or not | References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pneumatic amplifying pump | pneumatic with multiple amplification | 12-1.7×106 | 900 | no | [ |
Active flow splitting systems | split ratio is inversely proportional to resistance ratio | 50-2.5×106 | 40 | yes | [ |
Continuous flow pump | high precision motors driving double pistons in | 20-1×105 | 100 | yes | [ |
series/parallel | |||||
Syringe pump | high precision motor driving single piston | 20-2×103 | 120 | no | [ |
Electroosmotic pump | electroosmotic phenomenon | 0-5×104 | 40 | no | [ |
Magnetostriction pump | magnetostrictive effect | - | 130 kN | no | [ |
Thermal expansion pump | thermal expansion of liquid | 10-5×104 | 10 | no | [ |
Phase transition pump | volume change during phase transition of liquid or solid | minimum 100 | 80 | no | [ |
Table 2 Specifications of available nanoliter pumps
Type | Driving principle | Flow rate range/ (nL/min) | Maximum pressure/ MPa | Continuous delivery or not | References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pneumatic amplifying pump | pneumatic with multiple amplification | 12-1.7×106 | 900 | no | [ |
Active flow splitting systems | split ratio is inversely proportional to resistance ratio | 50-2.5×106 | 40 | yes | [ |
Continuous flow pump | high precision motors driving double pistons in | 20-1×105 | 100 | yes | [ |
series/parallel | |||||
Syringe pump | high precision motor driving single piston | 20-2×103 | 120 | no | [ |
Electroosmotic pump | electroosmotic phenomenon | 0-5×104 | 40 | no | [ |
Magnetostriction pump | magnetostrictive effect | - | 130 kN | no | [ |
Thermal expansion pump | thermal expansion of liquid | 10-5×104 | 10 | no | [ |
Phase transition pump | volume change during phase transition of liquid or solid | minimum 100 | 80 | no | [ |
Fig. 4 Schematic of integrated injection valve a. loading position and withdrawal of solvent from reservoir to pump; b. injection position and pumping of solvent to column.
Injection mode | Advantages | Disadvantages | References |
---|---|---|---|
Built-in sample loop | simple, robust, no sample loss | limited injection volume and peak capacity, no protection of the separation column | [ |
Variable-volume injection valve | robust, no sample loss, variable injection volume | higher machining precision, no protection of the separation column | [ |
Timed injection | variable injection volume, simple | precision affected by time and flow rate, no protection of the separation column | [ |
Trapped on a vented column | sample wash, greater injection volume, small dead volumes, protection of the separation column | interruption of the flow, pressure and spray, limited robustness, possible sample loss on the trap column | [ |
Trapped by column switching | sample wash, greater injection volume, robust, protection of the separation column | possible sample loss on the trap column, more modules | [ |
TASF | greater injection volume, small dead volumes, lower dispersion | repeatability affected by temperature control, baseline disturbance | [ |
Table 3 Comparison of different injection modes for nano liquid chromatography
Injection mode | Advantages | Disadvantages | References |
---|---|---|---|
Built-in sample loop | simple, robust, no sample loss | limited injection volume and peak capacity, no protection of the separation column | [ |
Variable-volume injection valve | robust, no sample loss, variable injection volume | higher machining precision, no protection of the separation column | [ |
Timed injection | variable injection volume, simple | precision affected by time and flow rate, no protection of the separation column | [ |
Trapped on a vented column | sample wash, greater injection volume, small dead volumes, protection of the separation column | interruption of the flow, pressure and spray, limited robustness, possible sample loss on the trap column | [ |
Trapped by column switching | sample wash, greater injection volume, robust, protection of the separation column | possible sample loss on the trap column, more modules | [ |
TASF | greater injection volume, small dead volumes, lower dispersion | repeatability affected by temperature control, baseline disturbance | [ |
Manufacturer | Model | Pump | Autosampler | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Flow rate range/ (μL/min) | maximum pressure/ MPa | Flow precision (RSD/%) | Delay volume/ nL | Lowest injection volume/μL | Injection repeatability (RSD) | |||
Thermo Fisher | Ultimate 3000 RSLCnano | 0.02-50 | 80 | 0.2 (300 nL/min) | 25 | 0.01 | 0.4%(full loop, 1 μL) | |
Scientific | ||||||||
Thermo Fisher | EASY-nano LC 1200 | 0.02-2 | 120 | 0.4 | 1000 | 0.1 | 0.2%(pick-up, 5 μL), | |
Scientific | 3.0%(pick-up, 0.1 μL) | |||||||
AB Sciex | Ekspert nanoLC 400 | 0.1-50 | 69 | 0.35 (500 nL/min) | 25 | 0.1 | 0.5%(full loop ), | |
1%(pick-up, >1 μL) | ||||||||
Waters | ACQUITY UPLC M-Class | 0.2-100 | 100 | - | 1000 | 0.1 | 1%(0.2-1.9 μL), | |
0.5%(2-10 μL) | ||||||||
Agilent | 1200 Infinity nano | 0.01-4 | 40 | 0.7 | 300 | - | - | |
Shimadzu | Nano Prominence | 0.001-5 | 40 | - | - | - | - |
Table 4 Specifications of some commercial nano liquid chromatography systems
Manufacturer | Model | Pump | Autosampler | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Flow rate range/ (μL/min) | maximum pressure/ MPa | Flow precision (RSD/%) | Delay volume/ nL | Lowest injection volume/μL | Injection repeatability (RSD) | |||
Thermo Fisher | Ultimate 3000 RSLCnano | 0.02-50 | 80 | 0.2 (300 nL/min) | 25 | 0.01 | 0.4%(full loop, 1 μL) | |
Scientific | ||||||||
Thermo Fisher | EASY-nano LC 1200 | 0.02-2 | 120 | 0.4 | 1000 | 0.1 | 0.2%(pick-up, 5 μL), | |
Scientific | 3.0%(pick-up, 0.1 μL) | |||||||
AB Sciex | Ekspert nanoLC 400 | 0.1-50 | 69 | 0.35 (500 nL/min) | 25 | 0.1 | 0.5%(full loop ), | |
1%(pick-up, >1 μL) | ||||||||
Waters | ACQUITY UPLC M-Class | 0.2-100 | 100 | - | 1000 | 0.1 | 1%(0.2-1.9 μL), | |
0.5%(2-10 μL) | ||||||||
Agilent | 1200 Infinity nano | 0.01-4 | 40 | 0.7 | 300 | - | - | |
Shimadzu | Nano Prominence | 0.001-5 | 40 | - | - | - | - |
|
[1] | WEN Hanrong, ZHU Jue, ZHANG Bo. Recent advances in microchip liquid chromatography [J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2021, 39(4): 357-367. |
[2] | YANG Sandong, DONG Zhiyong, HAN Xue, MA Zhou, TANG Tao, WANG Fengyun, LI Tong. Development and evaluation of a single stroke direct-driven ultrahigh pressure nano pump [J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2019, 37(5): 558-564. |
[3] | GUAN Yafeng*, WU Dapeng, DUAN Chunfeng. Advances in miniaturization of chromatograph and detectors [J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2011, 29(03): 193-198. |
Viewed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Full text 468
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract 584
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||