Preparation of molecularly imprinted polymers-functionalized silica nanoparticles for the separation and recognition of aristolochic acids

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1123.2021.06024

Abstract

Abstract:

Aristolochic acids (AAs), which is commonly found in Aristolochia and Asarum plants, has been widely used in several traditional medicine practices due to their anti-inflammatory, anti-malarial, and anti-hyperglycemic activities. Recently, researchers have found a “decisive link” between liver cancer and aristolochic acid after analyzing a large number of liver cancer samples around the world. Therefore, a highly sensitive and selective method is required for the analysis of AAs in traditional Chinese medicines (TCM). For the determination of AAs in TCM, pretreatment is indispensable because in actual TCM samples, AAs is present in trace amounts and the complex matrix exerts interference. In the past decades, molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs) have attracted considerable attention as an alternative for the trace analysis in complicated matrices.
In this study, MIP-coated SiO₂ nanoparticles (SiO₂@MIP NPs) was prepared for the determination of aristolochic acid by surface molecular imprinting using aristolochic acid Ⅰ (AAI ) as the template molecule, 2-vinylpyridine (VPY) as the functional monomer, and ethyleneglycol dimethacrylate (EGDMA) as the cross-linking agent. Core-shell-structure SiO₂@MIP NPs were obtained by modifying vinyl groups on the surface of SiO₂ NPs, coating MIPs films onto the silica surface via selective polymerization, and final extraction of template AAI and generation of the recognition site.
To find a suitable functional monomer for the best imprinting effect, the interaction between the template and the functional monomers, including acrylic acid (AA), methyl acrylic acid (MAA), 2-vinyl pyridine (VPY), acrylamide (AM), and methylacrylamide (MAM) was investigated. Electrostatic interaction between AAI and VPY resulted in the maximum decrease in absorbance of AAI at 250 nm. Therefore, VPY was chosen for the preparation of MIP. The morphological and physical properties of the MIPs were characterized by transmission electron microscopy (TEM), Fourier-transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy, thermogravimetric analysis, and N₂ adsorption and desorption surface analysis. TEM images showed that SiO₂ NPs were monodispersed with diameter of about 200 nm. The clear core-shell structure of SiO₂@MIP NPs was observed, and the thickness of MIPs coating was about 35 nm. The FT-IR spectra of SiO₂ NPs, vinyl group modified SiO₂ and SiO₂@MIP NPs revealed that the vinyl group and organic MIP layer were successfully modified at SiO₂ sequentially. The results of thermogravimetric analysis were consistent with the FT-IR data for different SiO₂ NPs. The nitrogen gas adsorption-desorption experiments showed that SiO₂@MIP NPs and non-imprinted polymer (SiO₂@NIP NPs) have the same pore volumes, while the surface area and pore size of MIPs were slightly larger than those of NIPs. Therefore, the difference in adsorption between SiO₂@MIP NPs and SiO₂@NIP NPs resulted from the imprinted sites on the MIP surface, rather than the difference in their surface areas.
The adsorption properties of SiO₂@MIP NPs were demonstrated by kinetic, isothermal, and selective adsorption experiments. The results of these experiments displayed that SiO₂@MIP NPs reached adsorption equilibrium within a short period (120 s) and possessed a much higher rebinding ability than SiO₂@NIP NPs. To verify the selectivity of SiO₂@MIP NPs for AAI, three structural analogues (viz. tanshinone ⅡA, 2-methoxy-5-nitrophenol, and benzoic acid) were selected. The results showed that the binding capacity of SiO₂@MIP NPs was much higher than those of these analogues. SiO₂@MIP NPs have high adsorption capacity (5.74 mg/g), high imprinting factor (4.9), good selectivity coefficient (2.3-6.6) towards the structural analogues. SiO₂@MIP NPs was used as an adsorbent and combined with HPLC for the selective separation of AAI in TCM. The recoveries of Kebia trifoliate samples spiked with three levels of AAI (0.3, 0.5, and 1.0 μg/mL) ranged from 73% to 83%. The results suggested that the proposed SiO₂@MIP NPs could be used for selective enrichment of AAI from real complex TCM samples.

Key words: surface imprinting technique, silica nanoparticles, aristolochic acids (AAs), traditional Chinese medicine (TCM)

CLC Number:

O658

ZHANG Yuemei, GUO Lihua, LI Yijun, HE Xiwen, CHEN Langxing, ZHANG Yukui. Preparation of molecularly imprinted polymers-functionalized silica nanoparticles for the separation and recognition of aristolochic acids[J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2021, 39(10): 1137-1145.

Figures/Tables 8

Fig. 1 Synthetic route of SiO2@MIP NPs MIP: molecularly imprinted polymer; NPs: nanoparticles; MPS: methacryloxy propyl trimethoxyl silane; AAI: aristolochic acid I; VPY: 2-vinyl pyridine; EGDMA: ethyleneglycol dimethacrylate; AIBN: azobisisobutyronitrile.

Fig. 2 UV-Vis spectra of the mixture solutions with AAI and different functional monomers AA: acrylic acid; AM: acrylamide; MAA: methyl acrylic acid; MAM: methylacrylamide.

Fig. 3 TEM images of (a) SiO2 NPs and (b) SiO2@MIP NPs

Fig. 4 (a) FT-IR spectra and (b) thermogravimetric analysis curves of SiO2 NPs, SiO2@MPS NPs and SiO2@MIP NPs NIP: non-imprinted polymer.

Fig. 5 N2 adsorption-desorption isotherm of SiO2@MIP NPs and SiO2@NIP NPs

Fig. 6 (a) Adsorption kinetic curves and (b) adsorption thermodynamic curves of SiO2@MIP和SiO2@NIP NPs (n=3)

Fig. 7 Adsorption capacities of SiO2@MIP NPs and SiO2@NIP NPs towards AAI, tanshinone ⅡA (TAN ⅡA), benzoic acid (BA) and 2-methoxy-5-nitrophenol (MENP) (n=3)

Fig. 8 Chromatograms of Kebia trifoliate extracts a. blank solution without pretreatment; b. spiked with 1 μg/mL AAI without pretreatment; c. spiked with 1 μg/mL AAI after pretreatment by SiO2@MIP NPs.

References

[1]	Yang H Y, Chen P C, Wang J D. Bio Med Res Int, 2014, 2014:569325
[2]	Heinke B, Tabea Z, Kerstin S, et al. Toxicology, 2019, 420:29
[3]	Zhao Y, Chan C K, Chan K K J, et al. Chem Res Toxicology, 2019, 32(10):2086
[4]	Ludivine R V, Camille W, Jerome L, et al. Toxicon, 2019, 172:53
[5]	Agrawal P, Laddha K. J Food Drug Anal, 2017, 25(2):425
[6]	Ye J P, Cai X, Zhou Q, et al. Microchim Acta, 2020, 187(11):623
[7]	Ji F Q, Jin R R, Luo C. J Chromatogr A, 2020, 1609:460455
[8]	Zhang J H, Wan Y A, Sun J, et al. RSC Adv, 2020, 10(58):35597
[9]	Li F, Gao J, Li X X, et al. J Chromatogr A, 2019, 1602:168
[10]	Chen L X, Liu Y X, He X W, et al. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2015, 33(5):481
[10]	陈朗星, 刘雨星, 何锡文, 等. 色谱, 2015, 33(5):481
[11]	Sun Z A, Qi Y X, Wang X, et al. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2018, 36(8):716
[11]	孙治安, 祁玉霞, 王霞, 等. 色谱, 2018, 36(8):716
[12]	Wang L Y, Wang J N, Li J H, et al. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2020, 38(3):265
[12]	王莉燕, 王加男, 李金花, 等. 色谱, 2020, 38(3):265
[13]	Hu W Y, Long M M, Hu Y F, et al. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2020, 38(3):307
[13]	胡文尧, 龙美名, 胡玉斐, 等. 色谱, 2020, 38(3):307
[14]	Dubey R S, Rajesh Y B R D, More M A. Mater Today: Proceedings, 2015, 2(4/5):3575
[15]	Giesche H. J Eur Ceram Soc, 1994, 14(3):205
[16]	Li F, Du P, Chen W, et al. Anal Chim Acta, 2007, 585(2):211
[17]	Xiao Y H, Xiao R, Tang J, et al. Talanta, 2017, 162:415
[18]	Ge Y H, Shu H, Xu X Y, et al. Mater Sci Eng C, 2019, 97:650
[19]	Stöber W, Fink A, Bohn E. J Colloid Interface Sci, 1968, 26(1):62
[20]	Li F, Li X X, Li Y J, et al. J Sep Sci, 2021, 44(10):2132
[21]	Baggiani C, Giovannoli C, Anfossi L, et al. J Am Chem Soc, 2012, 134(3):1513