Chinese Journal of Chromatography ›› 2024, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (10): 996-1005.DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1123.2024.02005
• Technical Notes • Previous Articles Next Articles
YANG Qin1,*(
), DING Li1, LI Zhaohui1, ZHANG Ran1, WEI Yue2, CHEN Ying3
Received:2024-02-07
Online:2024-10-08
Published:2024-09-27
Supported by:CLC Number:
YANG Qin, DING Li, LI Zhaohui, ZHANG Ran, WEI Yue, CHEN Ying. Identification of conservation and restoration materials for iron relics through ultraviolet-induced visible luminescence imaging and pyrolysis-gas chromatography/mass spectrometry[J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2024, 42(10): 996-1005.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.chrom-china.com/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1123.2024.02005
Fig. 1 VIS and UVL images of iron weight 20791 (The circles indicated are sampling locations) VIS: visible; UVL: ultraviolet-induced visible luminescence imaging.
Fig. 5 Total ion chromatograms (TICs) of samples and the shellac reference obtained by thermally assisted hydrolysis-methylation (THM)-pyrolysis-GC/MS analysis Conditions (method 1): The sample and 3 μL of tetramethylammonium hydroxide (TMAH) were put into the stainless-steel Eco-cup, then placed in the pyrolyzer. The pyrolysis temperature, 550 ℃. GC column, Ultra ALLOY+-5; helium at 1 mL/min. GC oven program: initial temperature 40 ℃, held for 2 min, 6 ℃/min to 320 ℃, held for 9 min. MS interface, 320 ℃; scan range, m/z 33-600. The peak numbers correspond to the numbers in Table 1.
| Peak No. | tR/min | Compound | Match score | Formula | RI-RI(lib)* |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.06 | propane, 1,2,3-trimethoxy- | 97 | C6H14O3 | -1 |
| 2 | 8.51 | hexanoic acid, methyl ester | 81 | C7H14O2 | 8 |
| 3 | 9.23 | 2,3-dimethoxypropan-1-ol | 95 | C5H12O3 | -40 |
| 4 | 11.01 | 6-heptenoic acid, methyl ester | 98 | C8H14O2 | -37 |
| 5 | 11.17 | heptanoic acid, methyl ester | 91 | C8H16O2 | 6 |
| 6 | 12.17 | 2-hydroxyisocaproic acid, methyl ether, methyl ester | 82 | C8H16O3 | -42 |
| 7 | 13.43 | 3-octenoic acid, methyl ester, (Z)- | 89 | C9H16O2 | -8 |
| 8 | 15.97 | 8-nonenoic acid, methyl ester | 83 | C10H18O2 | 10 |
| 9 | 18.25 | 4-decenoic acid, methyl ester | 80 | C11H20O2 | -18 |
| 10 | 21.10 | octanedioic acid, dimethyl ester | 98 | C10H18O4 | 10 |
| 11 | 21.39 | dimethyl phthalate | 93 | C10H10O4 | 2 |
| 12 | 23.19 | nonanedioic acid, dimethyl ester | 99 | C11H20O4 | 7 |
| 13 | 25.09 | decanedioic acid, dimethyl ester | 93 | C12H22O4 | 11 |
| 14 | 26.92 | undecanedioic acid, dimethyl ester | 88 | C13H24O4 | 12 |
| 15 | 28.66 | dodecanedioic acid, dimethyl ester | 80 | C14H26O4 | 16 |
| 16 | 29.84 | hexadecanoic acid, methyl ester | 98 | C17H34O2 | 20 |
| 17 | 32.57 | 10-octadecenoic acid, methyl ester | 92 | C19H36O2 | 26 |
| 18 | 32.67 | 9-octadecenoic acid, methyl ester, (E)- | 93 | C19H36O2 | 25 |
| 19 | 32.99 | methyl stearate | 95 | C19H38O2 | 22 |
| 20 | 33.33 | nonanoic acid, 9-(o-propylphenyl)-, methyl ester | 82 | C19H30O2 | 39 |
| 21 | 34.77 | sandaracopimaric acid methyl ester | 80 | C21H32O2 | 25 |
| 22 | 35.86 | methyl 18-methylnonadecanoate | 85 | C21H42O2 | -12 |
| 23 | 36.22 | methyl dehydroabietate | 92 | C21H30O2 | 7 |
| 24 | 37.76 | tetradehydroabietic acid, 7-methoxy-, methyl ester | 87 | C22H30O3 | -25 |
| 25 | 39.62 | 7,15-dimethoxytetradehydroabietic acid, methyl ester | 80 | C23H32O4 | -15 |
Table 1 Compounds identified in sample TQ-1 obtained by THM-Py-GC/MS
| Peak No. | tR/min | Compound | Match score | Formula | RI-RI(lib)* |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.06 | propane, 1,2,3-trimethoxy- | 97 | C6H14O3 | -1 |
| 2 | 8.51 | hexanoic acid, methyl ester | 81 | C7H14O2 | 8 |
| 3 | 9.23 | 2,3-dimethoxypropan-1-ol | 95 | C5H12O3 | -40 |
| 4 | 11.01 | 6-heptenoic acid, methyl ester | 98 | C8H14O2 | -37 |
| 5 | 11.17 | heptanoic acid, methyl ester | 91 | C8H16O2 | 6 |
| 6 | 12.17 | 2-hydroxyisocaproic acid, methyl ether, methyl ester | 82 | C8H16O3 | -42 |
| 7 | 13.43 | 3-octenoic acid, methyl ester, (Z)- | 89 | C9H16O2 | -8 |
| 8 | 15.97 | 8-nonenoic acid, methyl ester | 83 | C10H18O2 | 10 |
| 9 | 18.25 | 4-decenoic acid, methyl ester | 80 | C11H20O2 | -18 |
| 10 | 21.10 | octanedioic acid, dimethyl ester | 98 | C10H18O4 | 10 |
| 11 | 21.39 | dimethyl phthalate | 93 | C10H10O4 | 2 |
| 12 | 23.19 | nonanedioic acid, dimethyl ester | 99 | C11H20O4 | 7 |
| 13 | 25.09 | decanedioic acid, dimethyl ester | 93 | C12H22O4 | 11 |
| 14 | 26.92 | undecanedioic acid, dimethyl ester | 88 | C13H24O4 | 12 |
| 15 | 28.66 | dodecanedioic acid, dimethyl ester | 80 | C14H26O4 | 16 |
| 16 | 29.84 | hexadecanoic acid, methyl ester | 98 | C17H34O2 | 20 |
| 17 | 32.57 | 10-octadecenoic acid, methyl ester | 92 | C19H36O2 | 26 |
| 18 | 32.67 | 9-octadecenoic acid, methyl ester, (E)- | 93 | C19H36O2 | 25 |
| 19 | 32.99 | methyl stearate | 95 | C19H38O2 | 22 |
| 20 | 33.33 | nonanoic acid, 9-(o-propylphenyl)-, methyl ester | 82 | C19H30O2 | 39 |
| 21 | 34.77 | sandaracopimaric acid methyl ester | 80 | C21H32O2 | 25 |
| 22 | 35.86 | methyl 18-methylnonadecanoate | 85 | C21H42O2 | -12 |
| 23 | 36.22 | methyl dehydroabietate | 92 | C21H30O2 | 7 |
| 24 | 37.76 | tetradehydroabietic acid, 7-methoxy-, methyl ester | 87 | C22H30O3 | -25 |
| 25 | 39.62 | 7,15-dimethoxytetradehydroabietic acid, methyl ester | 80 | C23H32O4 | -15 |
| Peak No. | tR/min | Compound | Match score | Formula | RI-RI(lib) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.48 | toluene | 88 | C7H8 | 11 |
| 2 | 8.23 | propane, 1,2,3-trimethoxy- | 81 | C6H14O3 | -8 |
| 3 | 8.34 | 5-hexenoic acid, methyl ester | 88 | C7H12O2 | -36 |
| 4 | 11.03 | 6-heptenoic acid, methyl ester | 97 | C8H14O2 | -37 |
| 5 | 13.47 | 3-octenoic acid, methyl ester, (Z)- | 81 | C9H16O2 | -10 |
| 6 | 20.20 | longifolene | 94 | C15H24 | 9 |
| 7 | 21.11 | octanedioic acid, dimethyl ester | 96 | C10H18O4 | 9 |
| 8 | 21.39 | dimethyl phthalate | 96 | C10H10O4 | 2 |
| 9 | 23.14 | nonanedioic acid, dimethyl ester | 94 | C11H20O4 | 10 |
| 10 | 26.08 | methyl myristoleate | 92 | C15H28O2 | 25 |
| 11 | 26.38 | methyl tetradecanoate | 94 | C15H30O2 | 18 |
| 12 | 28.80 | butolic acid, methyl ester, methyl ether | 95 | C16H32O3 | 13 |
| 13 | 29.56 | 9-hexadecenoic acid, methyl ester, (Z)- | 95 | C17H32O2 | 9 |
| 14 | 29.85 | hexadecanoic acid, methyl ester | 97 | C17H34O2 | 19 |
| 15 | 32.69 | 11-octadecenoic acid, methyl ester | 82 | C19H36O2 | 29 |
| 16 | 32.84 | laccishellolic acid, dimethyl ester, methyl ether | 97 | C18H26O5 | 18 |
| 17 | 32.97 | methyl stearate | 95 | C19H38O2 | 23 |
| 18 | 34.85 | shellolic acid, dimethyl ester, dimethyl ether | 95 | C19H28O6 | 14 |
| 19 | 36.26 | methyl dehydroabietate | 94 | C21H30O2 | 3 |
| 20 | 36.85 | aleuritic acid, methyl ester, trimethyl ether | 95 | C20H40O5 | 5 |
| 21 | 37.78 | tetradehydroabietic acid, 7-methoxy-, methyl ester | 83 | C22H30O3 | -26 |
| 22 | 44.44 | 1-methoxyoctacosane | 96 | C29H60O | 28 |
| 23 | 46.52 | methyl triacontyl ether | 94 | C31H64O | 37 |
| 24 | 48.48 | dotriacontyl methyl ether | 93 | C33H68O | 37 |
| 25 | 50.52 | methyl tetratriacontyl ether | 84 | C35H72O | 41 |
Table 2 Compounds identified in sample TF-2 obtained by THM-Py-GC/MS
| Peak No. | tR/min | Compound | Match score | Formula | RI-RI(lib) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.48 | toluene | 88 | C7H8 | 11 |
| 2 | 8.23 | propane, 1,2,3-trimethoxy- | 81 | C6H14O3 | -8 |
| 3 | 8.34 | 5-hexenoic acid, methyl ester | 88 | C7H12O2 | -36 |
| 4 | 11.03 | 6-heptenoic acid, methyl ester | 97 | C8H14O2 | -37 |
| 5 | 13.47 | 3-octenoic acid, methyl ester, (Z)- | 81 | C9H16O2 | -10 |
| 6 | 20.20 | longifolene | 94 | C15H24 | 9 |
| 7 | 21.11 | octanedioic acid, dimethyl ester | 96 | C10H18O4 | 9 |
| 8 | 21.39 | dimethyl phthalate | 96 | C10H10O4 | 2 |
| 9 | 23.14 | nonanedioic acid, dimethyl ester | 94 | C11H20O4 | 10 |
| 10 | 26.08 | methyl myristoleate | 92 | C15H28O2 | 25 |
| 11 | 26.38 | methyl tetradecanoate | 94 | C15H30O2 | 18 |
| 12 | 28.80 | butolic acid, methyl ester, methyl ether | 95 | C16H32O3 | 13 |
| 13 | 29.56 | 9-hexadecenoic acid, methyl ester, (Z)- | 95 | C17H32O2 | 9 |
| 14 | 29.85 | hexadecanoic acid, methyl ester | 97 | C17H34O2 | 19 |
| 15 | 32.69 | 11-octadecenoic acid, methyl ester | 82 | C19H36O2 | 29 |
| 16 | 32.84 | laccishellolic acid, dimethyl ester, methyl ether | 97 | C18H26O5 | 18 |
| 17 | 32.97 | methyl stearate | 95 | C19H38O2 | 23 |
| 18 | 34.85 | shellolic acid, dimethyl ester, dimethyl ether | 95 | C19H28O6 | 14 |
| 19 | 36.26 | methyl dehydroabietate | 94 | C21H30O2 | 3 |
| 20 | 36.85 | aleuritic acid, methyl ester, trimethyl ether | 95 | C20H40O5 | 5 |
| 21 | 37.78 | tetradehydroabietic acid, 7-methoxy-, methyl ester | 83 | C22H30O3 | -26 |
| 22 | 44.44 | 1-methoxyoctacosane | 96 | C29H60O | 28 |
| 23 | 46.52 | methyl triacontyl ether | 94 | C31H64O | 37 |
| 24 | 48.48 | dotriacontyl methyl ether | 93 | C33H68O | 37 |
| 25 | 50.52 | methyl tetratriacontyl ether | 84 | C35H72O | 41 |
Fig. 7 Mass spectra and chemical structures of compounds of sample TF-2 a. butolic acid, methyl ester, methyl ether; b. aleuritic acid, methyl ester, trimethyl ether; c. laccishellolic acid, dimethyl ester, methyl ether; d. shellolic acid, dimethyl ester, dimethyl ether.
Fig. 9 Detailed images and TICs of samples GBTJ-1-6 Conditions (method 2): The pyrolysis temperature was 600 ℃. GC column, Ultra ALLOY+-5; helium at 1 mL/min. GC oven program: initial temperature 40 ℃, held for 2 min, 20 ℃/min to 320 ℃, held for 13 min. MS interface, 320 ℃, scan range, m/z 29-600. Sty: styrene; Ph: phenol; IP: 4-isopropylphenol; IP': 4-isopropenylphenol; BA: bisphenol A; αS: alpha-methylstyrene; D1: bibenzyl; D2: 1,2-diphenylpropane; SS: styrene dimer; D3: 2,5-diphenyl-1,5-hexadiene; SSS: styrene trimer.
Fig. 10 Detailed images and TICs of samples GBTJ-7-10 Conditions are the same as in Fig. 5 (method 1). 1. styrene; 2. butolic acid, methyl ester, methyl ether; 3. laccishellolic acid, dimethyl ester, methyl ether; 4. aleuritic acid, methyl ester, trimethyl ether.
|
| [1] | WANG Na, GU An, QU Yajie, LEI Yong. Identification of polysaccharide binding materials used in cultural relics by pyrolysis-gas chromatography/mass spectrometry [J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2022, 40(8): 753-762. |
| [2] | WANG Lili, WANG Cong, PAN Zaifa, SUN Fa. Pyrolysis-gas chromatographic fingerprints with hierarchical cluster analysis for Dendrobium candidum Wall. ex Lindl. [J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2008, 26(5): 613-617. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||