Chinese Journal of Chromatography ›› 2026, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (9): 1019-1027.DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1123.2025.09022
• Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
BI Ruifeng*(
), FU Shihui, DENG Suocheng, FU Meng, ZHANG Weiwei, SONG Yuhua
Received:2025-09-29
Online:2026-09-08
Published:2026-09-17
CLC Number:
BI Ruifeng, FU Shihui, DENG Suocheng, FU Meng, ZHANG Weiwei, SONG Yuhua. Determination of glufosinate and its metabolite residues in tea by ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry coupled with precolumn derivatization[J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2026, 44(9): 1019-1027.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.chrom-china.com/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1123.2025.09022
| Compound | tR/ min | Molecular formula | Mr | Precursor ion (m/z) | Product ions (m/z) | Collision energies/eV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GLU/NAG-TEOA | 4.31 | C11H22NO5P | 279.12 | 280.1 | 164.0*, 238.0, 206.0 | 25, 13, 13 |
| MPP-TEOA | 6.03 | C8H17O4P | 208.09 | 209.1 | 79.1*, 135.1, 163.0 | 35, 15, 8 |
| GLU-D3-TEOA | 4.31 | C11H19D3NO5P | 282.14 | 283.1 | 167.1 | 20 |
| MPP-D3-TEOA | 6.00 | C8H14D3O4P | 211.11 | 212.1 | 138.0 | 16 |
Table 1 Retention times and MS parameters of the target compounds and their isotope internal standards
| Compound | tR/ min | Molecular formula | Mr | Precursor ion (m/z) | Product ions (m/z) | Collision energies/eV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GLU/NAG-TEOA | 4.31 | C11H22NO5P | 279.12 | 280.1 | 164.0*, 238.0, 206.0 | 25, 13, 13 |
| MPP-TEOA | 6.03 | C8H17O4P | 208.09 | 209.1 | 79.1*, 135.1, 163.0 | 35, 15, 8 |
| GLU-D3-TEOA | 4.31 | C11H19D3NO5P | 282.14 | 283.1 | 167.1 | 20 |
| MPP-D3-TEOA | 6.00 | C8H14D3O4P | 211.11 | 212.1 | 138.0 | 16 |
| Compound | Linear equation | Linear range/(μg/L) | r2 | LOD/(µg/kg) | LOQ/(µg/kg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GLU/NAG | y=64.819171x‒0.165423 | 0.5‒20 | 0.99915 | 2.2 | 25 |
| MPP | y=69.870442x‒0.008150 | 0.5‒20 | 0.99942 | 5.3 | 25 |
Table 2 Linear equations, linear ranges, correlation coefficients (r2), LODs, and LOQs of the GLU/NAG and MPP
| Compound | Linear equation | Linear range/(μg/L) | r2 | LOD/(µg/kg) | LOQ/(µg/kg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GLU/NAG | y=64.819171x‒0.165423 | 0.5‒20 | 0.99915 | 2.2 | 25 |
| MPP | y=69.870442x‒0.008150 | 0.5‒20 | 0.99942 | 5.3 | 25 |
| Compound | Spiked level/(mg/kg) | Green tea | Black tea | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recovery/% | Intra-day RSD/% (n=5) | Inter-day RSD/% (n=10) | Recovery/% | Intra-day RSD/% (n=5) | Inter-day RSD/% (n=10) | ||
| GLU/NAG | 0.025 | 102.9 | 2.9 | 5.9 | 105.0 | 2.9 | 6.3 |
| 0.05 | 92.6 | 5.0 | 4.0 | 95.0 | 6.9 | 5.9 | |
| 0.1 | 89.2 | 4.1 | 3.4 | 83.9 | 5.5 | 5.2 | |
| 0.5 | 89.9 | 1.9 | 2.6 | 90.5 | 4.5 | 4.6 | |
| MPP | 0.025 | 98.5 | 3.8 | 8.8 | 99.1 | 3.7 | 10.3 |
| 0.05 | 86.9 | 5.0 | 5.6 | 89.6 | 4.8 | 5.7 | |
| 0.1 | 85.7 | 2.6 | 3.1 | 92.8 | 4.4 | 7.1 | |
| 0.5 | 87.6 | 3.5 | 5.5 | 88.5 | 2.7 | 5.2 | |
Table 3 Recoveries, intra-day and inter-day precisions of the GLU/NAG and MPP
| Compound | Spiked level/(mg/kg) | Green tea | Black tea | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recovery/% | Intra-day RSD/% (n=5) | Inter-day RSD/% (n=10) | Recovery/% | Intra-day RSD/% (n=5) | Inter-day RSD/% (n=10) | ||
| GLU/NAG | 0.025 | 102.9 | 2.9 | 5.9 | 105.0 | 2.9 | 6.3 |
| 0.05 | 92.6 | 5.0 | 4.0 | 95.0 | 6.9 | 5.9 | |
| 0.1 | 89.2 | 4.1 | 3.4 | 83.9 | 5.5 | 5.2 | |
| 0.5 | 89.9 | 1.9 | 2.6 | 90.5 | 4.5 | 4.6 | |
| MPP | 0.025 | 98.5 | 3.8 | 8.8 | 99.1 | 3.7 | 10.3 |
| 0.05 | 86.9 | 5.0 | 5.6 | 89.6 | 4.8 | 5.7 | |
| 0.1 | 85.7 | 2.6 | 3.1 | 92.8 | 4.4 | 7.1 | |
| 0.5 | 87.6 | 3.5 | 5.5 | 88.5 | 2.7 | 5.2 | |
| No. | Type of tea | Contents/(μg/kg) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GLU/NAG | MPP | Sum (expressed as GLU) | ||
| 1 | green tea | 36 | ND* | 36 |
| 2 | green tea | 40 | 65 | 117 |
| 3 | green tea | 50 | 405 | 532 |
| 4 | black tea | 31 | <25 | 31 |
| 5 | black tea | 60 | <25 | 60 |
| 6 | oolong | <25 | ND | / |
| 7 | oolong | <25 | ND | / |
| 8 | jasmine tea | <25 | ND | / |
| 9 | white tea | <25 | ND | / |
Table 4 Positive test results of GLU and its metabolites in the actual sample
| No. | Type of tea | Contents/(μg/kg) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GLU/NAG | MPP | Sum (expressed as GLU) | ||
| 1 | green tea | 36 | ND* | 36 |
| 2 | green tea | 40 | 65 | 117 |
| 3 | green tea | 50 | 405 | 532 |
| 4 | black tea | 31 | <25 | 31 |
| 5 | black tea | 60 | <25 | 60 |
| 6 | oolong | <25 | ND | / |
| 7 | oolong | <25 | ND | / |
| 8 | jasmine tea | <25 | ND | / |
| 9 | white tea | <25 | ND | / |
|
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||