色谱 ›› 2026, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (2): 151-168.DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1123.2025.06034
闫敬怡1,2, 黄晶滢2, 彭思源2, 满铭叁2, 孙大妮3, 刘萍3, 陈令新2, 李金花2,*(
), 范华英1,*(
)
收稿日期:2025-06-30
出版日期:2026-02-08
发布日期:2026-02-05
通讯作者:
李金花,范华英
基金资助:
YAN Jingyi1,2, HUANG Jingying2, PENG Siyuan2, MAN Mingsan2, SUN Dani3, LIU Ping3, CHEN Lingxin2, LI Jinhua2,*(
), FAN Huaying1,*(
)
Received:2025-06-30
Online:2026-02-08
Published:2026-02-05
Contact:
LI Jinhua, FAN Huaying
Supported by:摘要:
药物广泛应用于医疗、农业及畜牧业领域,然而长期和不规范使用致使其在食品、生物及环境中残留,对人类健康和生态环境构成潜在严重威胁。发展灵敏、精准的药物残留检测方法已成为药物研究的重要前提和当前热点。然而,待测样品基质复杂且药物残留水平极低,因此即便是色谱/质谱这类高效技术,也仍需依赖高效的样品前处理环节。分子印迹固相微萃取(MI-SPME)兼顾固相微萃取快速、高效、无溶剂的优点,以及分子印迹聚合物(MIPs)的特异性识别与选择性吸附能力,在复杂样品药物残留的高选择性分离和萃取方面展现出显著优势。本综述聚焦2019年以来MI-SPME结合色谱/质谱用于药物残留测定的研究进展。首先,介绍了SPME的原理与操作流程,以及用于SPME的MIPs的制备方法和新技术/策略,包括自由基聚合、原位聚合、溶胶-凝胶聚合、表面印迹、纳米印迹、虚拟模板印迹、多模板印迹、多功能单体印迹和刺激响应型印迹。然后,概述了6种不同的MI-SPME装置模式,即基于MIPs的涂层纤维式、管内式、搅拌棒式、分散式、薄膜式和尖端式SPME。随后,重点总结了MI-SPME结合色谱/质谱在食品安全、环境监测、生物医药领域的典型应用。最后,讨论了MI-SPME在药物残留测定中面临的挑战,如MIPs的制备与优化、MI-SPME模式创新、新材料开发与成本控制、自动化集成等,并对MI-SPME制备和药物残留检测应用的前景进行了展望。
中图分类号:
闫敬怡, 黄晶滢, 彭思源, 满铭叁, 孙大妮, 刘萍, 陈令新, 李金花, 范华英. 分子印迹固相微萃取结合色谱/质谱在药物残留测定中的应用[J]. 色谱, 2026, 44(2): 151-168.
YAN Jingyi, HUANG Jingying, PENG Siyuan, MAN Mingsan, SUN Dani, LIU Ping, CHEN Lingxin, LI Jinhua, FAN Huaying. Applications of molecularly imprinted solid-phase microextraction coupled with chromatography/mass spectrometry for determination of drug residues[J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2026, 44(2): 151-168.
| Analytes | Template | Polymerizationmethod | Imprinting technique and strategy | SPME mode | Chromatography/MS | Linear range | LOD | Recovery/% | Real samples | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Five MACs | ROX | - | surface imprinting | in-tip SPME | ESI-MS | 0.05-100 ng/g | 0.003-0.005 ng/g | 73.4-98.1 | drinking water, honey, milk | [ |
| Four MACs | piramycin | - | stimuli-responsive imprinting | coated fiber SPME | HPLC-UV | 0.5-50 μg/mL | 23.8-85.4 μg/kg | 81.8-119.1 | honey | [ |
| Four SAs | SMM | emulsion polymerization | surface imprinting | SBSE | HPLC-MS/MS | 10-1000 μg/L | 1.5-3.4 μg/L | 80-89 | animal feeds | [ |
| Four SAs | silver sulfadiazine | - | nano-imprinting | TFME | HPLC-UV | 0.01-50 μg/L | 0.003 μg/L | 95.9-101.0 | milk, eggs and chicken meat | [ |
| Seven TCs | minocycline | - | nano-imprinting | DSPME | UHPLC-PDA | 0.5-200 ng/mL | 0.2-0.6 ng/g | 69.6-94.7 | chicken muscle | [ |
| Five TCs | TC | bulk polymerization | multi-functional monomer imprinting | coated fiber SPME | HPLC-UV | 5-1000 μg/L | 0.38-0.72 μg/kg | 77.3-104.4 | milk, chicken, fish | [ |
| Six aminoglycosides | TOB | precipitation polymerization | - | coated fiber SPME | UHPLC-MS/MS | 0.1-500 μg/kg | 0.002-0.02 μg/kg | 86.2-115.3 | milk, honey | [ |
| Five estrogens | E2 | in situ polymerization | - | IT-SPME | HPLC-DAD | 1.00-200.00 μg/L | 0.33 μg/L | 74.75-119.41 | milk, yogurt | [ |
| E2 | E2 | in situ polymerization | - | IT-SPME | HPLC-UV | 0.10-200.00 μg/kg | 0.03 μg/kg | 79.61-105.70 | meat | [ |
| Seven BZs | 2-aminobenzimidazole | - | dummy template imprinting | DSPME | UHPLC-PDA | 5-2000 ng/mL | 0.2-0.5 ng/g | 92.3-97.1 | beef | [ |
| β-Agonist | clenbuterol | - | surface imprinting | SBSE | HPLC-MS/MS | 0.5-35 μg/L | 0.05-0.15 μg/kg | 75.8-97.9 | pork | [ |
| 2,4-D | 2,4-D | - | surface imprinting | TFME | HPLC-UV | 1.0-10 mg/L | 0.03 mg/L | 88.8-96.6 | milk | [ |
| Six neonicotinoids | CLT | - | - | IT-SPME | HPLC-DAD | 50-4000 μg/L | 0.03-0.58 μg/L | 85.4-116.8 | tea, honey | [ |
| Four pyrethroids | enpropathrin, deltamethrin, cyfluthrin, bifenthrin | - | surface imprinting | coated fiber SPME | HPLC-DAD | 0.50-200.00 μg/L | 0.16-0.33 μg/L | 72.74-119.66 | tea | [ |
| Difenoconazole | difenoconazole | sol-gel method | surface imprinting | coated fiber SPME | GC-ECD | 0.01-1 ng/mL | 0.002 ng/mL | 73-103 | wheat, cucumber, apple | [ |
| Five SUHs | triflusulfuron-methyl | in situ polymerization | - | IT-SPME | HPLC-DAD | 0.10-200.0 μg/L | 0.014-0.058 μg/L | 75.2-102 | spiked soya milk, grape juice | [ |
| Five OPPs | diazinon, parathion-methyl, isocarbophos | sol-gel method | multi-template imprinted | coated fiber SPME | GC-NPD | 0.1-100 μg/kg | 0.0052-0.23 μg/kg | 75.1-123.2 | spiked apple, cucumber, Chinese cabbage, cherry tomato | [ |
| Five OPPs | diazinon, isocarbophos | sol-gel method | - | coated fiber SPME | GC-NPD | 0.1-1000 μg/kg | 0.0028-0.0436 μg/kg | 78.7-122.8 | apple, potato | [ |
| Five OPPs | ethion | - | stimuli-responsive imprinting | DSPME | GC-FID | 0.50-2000 μg/L | 0.25-0.50 μg/L | 93-117 | fruit, vegetable | [ |
| Pyriproxyfen | pyriproxyfen | sol-gel method | multi-functional monomer imprinting | DSPME | HPLC-DAD | 5.25×10-5-43 μg/mL | 4.93×10-5 μg/mL | 95.9-97 | strawberry | [ |
| Thiabendazole and carbendazim | thiabendazole | sol-gel method | surface imprinting | SBSE | HPLC-DAD | 25-1000 μg/L | 0.10-0.13 mg/kg | 21-33 | orange | [ |
| Paraquat | paraquat | sol-gel method | - | SBSE | HPLC-UV | 0.02-0.85 mg kg | 0.005 mg/kg | 70.0-96.1 | lettuce | [ |
| Fipronil | fipronil | precipitation polymerization | - | DSPME | HPLC-DAD | 6×10-3-45 μg/mL | 5.64×10-6 μg/mL | 94.6-96.5 | milk | [ |
| Quercetin | quercetin | sol-gel method | surface imprinting | coated fiber SPME | HPLC-UV | 0.05-100 μg/mL | 9.94 ng/mL | 94.20-98.50 | tea, coffees | [ |
| Four amphetamine derivatives | dextroamphetamine | - | nano-imprinting | IT-SPME | GC-MS | 0.1-400 μg/L | 0.023-0.033 μg/L | 96.2-98.9 | beverage, snack | [ |
| Amphetamines and modafinil | amphetamines, modafinil | - | - | IT-SPME | GC-MS | 0.1-400 μg/L | 0.023-0.033 μg/L | 95.14-104.63 | medicinal supplements | [ |
表1 MI-SPME结合色谱/质谱在食品样品药物残留测定中的应用
Table 1 Applications of molecularly imprinted solid-phase microextraction (MI-SPME) coupled with chromatography/MS for the determination of drug residues in food samples
| Analytes | Template | Polymerizationmethod | Imprinting technique and strategy | SPME mode | Chromatography/MS | Linear range | LOD | Recovery/% | Real samples | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Five MACs | ROX | - | surface imprinting | in-tip SPME | ESI-MS | 0.05-100 ng/g | 0.003-0.005 ng/g | 73.4-98.1 | drinking water, honey, milk | [ |
| Four MACs | piramycin | - | stimuli-responsive imprinting | coated fiber SPME | HPLC-UV | 0.5-50 μg/mL | 23.8-85.4 μg/kg | 81.8-119.1 | honey | [ |
| Four SAs | SMM | emulsion polymerization | surface imprinting | SBSE | HPLC-MS/MS | 10-1000 μg/L | 1.5-3.4 μg/L | 80-89 | animal feeds | [ |
| Four SAs | silver sulfadiazine | - | nano-imprinting | TFME | HPLC-UV | 0.01-50 μg/L | 0.003 μg/L | 95.9-101.0 | milk, eggs and chicken meat | [ |
| Seven TCs | minocycline | - | nano-imprinting | DSPME | UHPLC-PDA | 0.5-200 ng/mL | 0.2-0.6 ng/g | 69.6-94.7 | chicken muscle | [ |
| Five TCs | TC | bulk polymerization | multi-functional monomer imprinting | coated fiber SPME | HPLC-UV | 5-1000 μg/L | 0.38-0.72 μg/kg | 77.3-104.4 | milk, chicken, fish | [ |
| Six aminoglycosides | TOB | precipitation polymerization | - | coated fiber SPME | UHPLC-MS/MS | 0.1-500 μg/kg | 0.002-0.02 μg/kg | 86.2-115.3 | milk, honey | [ |
| Five estrogens | E2 | in situ polymerization | - | IT-SPME | HPLC-DAD | 1.00-200.00 μg/L | 0.33 μg/L | 74.75-119.41 | milk, yogurt | [ |
| E2 | E2 | in situ polymerization | - | IT-SPME | HPLC-UV | 0.10-200.00 μg/kg | 0.03 μg/kg | 79.61-105.70 | meat | [ |
| Seven BZs | 2-aminobenzimidazole | - | dummy template imprinting | DSPME | UHPLC-PDA | 5-2000 ng/mL | 0.2-0.5 ng/g | 92.3-97.1 | beef | [ |
| β-Agonist | clenbuterol | - | surface imprinting | SBSE | HPLC-MS/MS | 0.5-35 μg/L | 0.05-0.15 μg/kg | 75.8-97.9 | pork | [ |
| 2,4-D | 2,4-D | - | surface imprinting | TFME | HPLC-UV | 1.0-10 mg/L | 0.03 mg/L | 88.8-96.6 | milk | [ |
| Six neonicotinoids | CLT | - | - | IT-SPME | HPLC-DAD | 50-4000 μg/L | 0.03-0.58 μg/L | 85.4-116.8 | tea, honey | [ |
| Four pyrethroids | enpropathrin, deltamethrin, cyfluthrin, bifenthrin | - | surface imprinting | coated fiber SPME | HPLC-DAD | 0.50-200.00 μg/L | 0.16-0.33 μg/L | 72.74-119.66 | tea | [ |
| Difenoconazole | difenoconazole | sol-gel method | surface imprinting | coated fiber SPME | GC-ECD | 0.01-1 ng/mL | 0.002 ng/mL | 73-103 | wheat, cucumber, apple | [ |
| Five SUHs | triflusulfuron-methyl | in situ polymerization | - | IT-SPME | HPLC-DAD | 0.10-200.0 μg/L | 0.014-0.058 μg/L | 75.2-102 | spiked soya milk, grape juice | [ |
| Five OPPs | diazinon, parathion-methyl, isocarbophos | sol-gel method | multi-template imprinted | coated fiber SPME | GC-NPD | 0.1-100 μg/kg | 0.0052-0.23 μg/kg | 75.1-123.2 | spiked apple, cucumber, Chinese cabbage, cherry tomato | [ |
| Five OPPs | diazinon, isocarbophos | sol-gel method | - | coated fiber SPME | GC-NPD | 0.1-1000 μg/kg | 0.0028-0.0436 μg/kg | 78.7-122.8 | apple, potato | [ |
| Five OPPs | ethion | - | stimuli-responsive imprinting | DSPME | GC-FID | 0.50-2000 μg/L | 0.25-0.50 μg/L | 93-117 | fruit, vegetable | [ |
| Pyriproxyfen | pyriproxyfen | sol-gel method | multi-functional monomer imprinting | DSPME | HPLC-DAD | 5.25×10-5-43 μg/mL | 4.93×10-5 μg/mL | 95.9-97 | strawberry | [ |
| Thiabendazole and carbendazim | thiabendazole | sol-gel method | surface imprinting | SBSE | HPLC-DAD | 25-1000 μg/L | 0.10-0.13 mg/kg | 21-33 | orange | [ |
| Paraquat | paraquat | sol-gel method | - | SBSE | HPLC-UV | 0.02-0.85 mg kg | 0.005 mg/kg | 70.0-96.1 | lettuce | [ |
| Fipronil | fipronil | precipitation polymerization | - | DSPME | HPLC-DAD | 6×10-3-45 μg/mL | 5.64×10-6 μg/mL | 94.6-96.5 | milk | [ |
| Quercetin | quercetin | sol-gel method | surface imprinting | coated fiber SPME | HPLC-UV | 0.05-100 μg/mL | 9.94 ng/mL | 94.20-98.50 | tea, coffees | [ |
| Four amphetamine derivatives | dextroamphetamine | - | nano-imprinting | IT-SPME | GC-MS | 0.1-400 μg/L | 0.023-0.033 μg/L | 96.2-98.9 | beverage, snack | [ |
| Amphetamines and modafinil | amphetamines, modafinil | - | - | IT-SPME | GC-MS | 0.1-400 μg/L | 0.023-0.033 μg/L | 95.14-104.63 | medicinal supplements | [ |
| Analytes | Template | Polymerization method | Imprinting technique and strategy | SPME mode | Chromatography/MS | Linear range | LOD | Recovery/% | Real samples | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Four triazines | propazine | - | dummy template imprinting | IT-SPME | HPLC-DAD | 100-1000 μg/L | 6.2-15.7 ng/g | 75.7-120.1 | soil | [ |
| Sulfamethoxazole | sulfamethoxazole | - | nano-imprinting | DSPME | HPLC-UV | 7-900 ng/mL | 2.0 ng/mL | 94.2-98.2 | spiked water | [ |
| Four FQs | ENRO | - | - | IT-SPME | HPLC-UV | 10-500 μg/L | 0.1-10 μg/L | 9.4-24.5 | surface water, groundwater, urine | [ |
| NOR | NOR | precipitation polymerization | surface imprinting | TFME | HPLC-DAD | - | 0.15 μg/L | 90.1-102.7 | seawater, fish | [ |
| Phenobarbital | phenobarbital | sol-gel method | surface imprinting | coated fiber SPME | HPLC-UV | 0.01-4 μg/mL | 7.5 ng/mL | 92.4-98.0 | spiked river, well water | [ |
| Aniline | aniline | suspension polymerizatio | surface imprinting | DSPME | HPLC-MS | 1-200 ng/mL | 1 ng/mL | 62 | textile wastewater | [ |
| Diazepam | diazepam | bulk polymerization | - | SBSE | UHPLC-MS/MS | 0.05-500 μg/L | 0.4 ng/L | 84-102 | natural water | [ |
| Naproxen | s-naproxen | - | - | SBSE | HPLC-DAD | 0.01-200 μg/L | 0.005 μg/L | 83.98-118.88 | lake water, river water | [ |
表2 MI-SPME结合色谱/质谱在环境样品药物残留测定中的应用
Table 2 Applications of MI-SPME coupled with chromatography/MS for the determination of drug residues in environmental samples
| Analytes | Template | Polymerization method | Imprinting technique and strategy | SPME mode | Chromatography/MS | Linear range | LOD | Recovery/% | Real samples | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Four triazines | propazine | - | dummy template imprinting | IT-SPME | HPLC-DAD | 100-1000 μg/L | 6.2-15.7 ng/g | 75.7-120.1 | soil | [ |
| Sulfamethoxazole | sulfamethoxazole | - | nano-imprinting | DSPME | HPLC-UV | 7-900 ng/mL | 2.0 ng/mL | 94.2-98.2 | spiked water | [ |
| Four FQs | ENRO | - | - | IT-SPME | HPLC-UV | 10-500 μg/L | 0.1-10 μg/L | 9.4-24.5 | surface water, groundwater, urine | [ |
| NOR | NOR | precipitation polymerization | surface imprinting | TFME | HPLC-DAD | - | 0.15 μg/L | 90.1-102.7 | seawater, fish | [ |
| Phenobarbital | phenobarbital | sol-gel method | surface imprinting | coated fiber SPME | HPLC-UV | 0.01-4 μg/mL | 7.5 ng/mL | 92.4-98.0 | spiked river, well water | [ |
| Aniline | aniline | suspension polymerizatio | surface imprinting | DSPME | HPLC-MS | 1-200 ng/mL | 1 ng/mL | 62 | textile wastewater | [ |
| Diazepam | diazepam | bulk polymerization | - | SBSE | UHPLC-MS/MS | 0.05-500 μg/L | 0.4 ng/L | 84-102 | natural water | [ |
| Naproxen | s-naproxen | - | - | SBSE | HPLC-DAD | 0.01-200 μg/L | 0.005 μg/L | 83.98-118.88 | lake water, river water | [ |
| Analytes | Template | Polymerization method | Imprinting technique and strategy | SPME mode | Chromatography/MS | Linear range | LOD | Recovery/% | Real samples | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TP | TP | - | surface imprinting | TFME | IMS | 3.3-200 μmol/L | 1.1 μmol/L | 81-94 | human serum | [ |
| Chrysophanol | chrysophanol | radical polymerization | surface imprinting | coated fiber SPME | HPLC-UV | 0.007-0.2 μg/mL | 2.68 ng/mL | 94.01-96.20 | urine | [ |
| Phenobarbital | phenobarbital | sol-gel method | surface imprinting | coated fiber SPME | HPLC-UV | 0.02-100 μg/mL | 9.88 ng/mL | 94.26-98.50 | urine | [ |
| Propranolol | propranolol | RAFT polymerization | - | DSPME | HPLC-UV | 0.015-100 μmol/L | 0.002 μmol/L | 85.2-97.4 | bovine serum | [ |
| CBZ | CBZ | in situ polymerization | nano-imprinting | IT-SPME | HPLC-UV | 0.01-500 μg/L | 0.05 μg/L | 92.0-114.0 | urine, plasma | [ |
| OXY | OXY | - | stimuli-responsive imprinting | DSPME | HPLC-UV | 1-2000 ng/mL | 0.80 ng/mL | 92.50-103.20 | urine | [ |
| Harmaline | harmaline | - | stimuli-responsive imprinting | DSPME | HPLC-UV | 1.0-4000 ng/mL | 0.526 ng/mL | 90.00-99.25 | peganum harmala | [ |
| Hymol and carvacrol | hymol, carvacrol | - | stimuli-responsive imprinting | DSPME | HPLC-UV | 0.40-5000 ng/mL | 0.042 ng/mL | 96.6-105.4 | summer savoury, Origanum majorana, Origanum vulgare | [ |
| CAP | CAP | RAFT polymerization | stimuli-responsive imprinting | DSPME | HPLC-UV | 5-2000 ng/mL | 1.9 ng/mL | 93.41-102.50 | plasma | [ |
| MLT | MLT | - | stimuli-responsive imprinting | DSPME | HPLC-UV | 0.2-4200 ng/mL | 0.046 ng/mL | 93.07-104.1 | urine, plasma | [ |
| CBD | CBD | in situ polymerization | - | IT-SPME | UHPLC-MS/MS | 10-300 ng/mL | - | 53 | plasma | [ |
| Digoxin | digoxin | in situ polymerization | surface imprinting | coated fiber SPME | HPLC-UV | 0.1-10 ng/mL | 0.03 ng/mL | - | urine, serum | [ |
| Valproic acid | valproic acid | - | - | coated fiber SPME | GC-FID | 0.03-100 μg/L | 0.01 μg/L | 90.5-7.5 | human serum | [ |
表3 MI-SPME结合色谱/质谱在生物样品药物残留测定中的应用
Table 3 Applications of MI-SPME coupled with chromatography/MS for the determination of drug residues in biological samples
| Analytes | Template | Polymerization method | Imprinting technique and strategy | SPME mode | Chromatography/MS | Linear range | LOD | Recovery/% | Real samples | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TP | TP | - | surface imprinting | TFME | IMS | 3.3-200 μmol/L | 1.1 μmol/L | 81-94 | human serum | [ |
| Chrysophanol | chrysophanol | radical polymerization | surface imprinting | coated fiber SPME | HPLC-UV | 0.007-0.2 μg/mL | 2.68 ng/mL | 94.01-96.20 | urine | [ |
| Phenobarbital | phenobarbital | sol-gel method | surface imprinting | coated fiber SPME | HPLC-UV | 0.02-100 μg/mL | 9.88 ng/mL | 94.26-98.50 | urine | [ |
| Propranolol | propranolol | RAFT polymerization | - | DSPME | HPLC-UV | 0.015-100 μmol/L | 0.002 μmol/L | 85.2-97.4 | bovine serum | [ |
| CBZ | CBZ | in situ polymerization | nano-imprinting | IT-SPME | HPLC-UV | 0.01-500 μg/L | 0.05 μg/L | 92.0-114.0 | urine, plasma | [ |
| OXY | OXY | - | stimuli-responsive imprinting | DSPME | HPLC-UV | 1-2000 ng/mL | 0.80 ng/mL | 92.50-103.20 | urine | [ |
| Harmaline | harmaline | - | stimuli-responsive imprinting | DSPME | HPLC-UV | 1.0-4000 ng/mL | 0.526 ng/mL | 90.00-99.25 | peganum harmala | [ |
| Hymol and carvacrol | hymol, carvacrol | - | stimuli-responsive imprinting | DSPME | HPLC-UV | 0.40-5000 ng/mL | 0.042 ng/mL | 96.6-105.4 | summer savoury, Origanum majorana, Origanum vulgare | [ |
| CAP | CAP | RAFT polymerization | stimuli-responsive imprinting | DSPME | HPLC-UV | 5-2000 ng/mL | 1.9 ng/mL | 93.41-102.50 | plasma | [ |
| MLT | MLT | - | stimuli-responsive imprinting | DSPME | HPLC-UV | 0.2-4200 ng/mL | 0.046 ng/mL | 93.07-104.1 | urine, plasma | [ |
| CBD | CBD | in situ polymerization | - | IT-SPME | UHPLC-MS/MS | 10-300 ng/mL | - | 53 | plasma | [ |
| Digoxin | digoxin | in situ polymerization | surface imprinting | coated fiber SPME | HPLC-UV | 0.1-10 ng/mL | 0.03 ng/mL | - | urine, serum | [ |
| Valproic acid | valproic acid | - | - | coated fiber SPME | GC-FID | 0.03-100 μg/L | 0.01 μg/L | 90.5-7.5 | human serum | [ |
|
| [1] | 宋庆美, 李昕昊, 吕永琴. 分子印迹聚合物的设计合成及其在医学诊疗与生物催化中的应用[J]. 色谱, 2026, 44(2): 134-150. |
| [2] | 张羽凡, 夏静雯, 朱佳源, 曾茂盛, 白静怡, 徐琴, 高杭. 分子印迹聚合物在急性冠脉综合征生物标志物测定传感器中的应用[J]. 色谱, 2026, 44(2): 180-190. |
| [3] | 张玄, 刘树成, 潘建明. 分子印迹纳米酶在生物传感领域中的应用进展[J]. 色谱, 2026, 44(2): 169-179. |
| [4] | 李菲, 贾保林, 胡乔, 何锡文, 陈朗星, 张玉奎. 分子印迹聚合物:新型绿色制备方法与前沿应用综述[J]. 色谱, 2026, 44(2): 119-133. |
| [5] | 齐婉婷, 佟育奎. ZIF-L基硼酸亲和分子印迹材料的设计及其在环境水中利巴韦林检测中的应用[J]. 色谱, 2026, 44(2): 214-222. |
| [6] | 叶为民, 何东城, 崔新江, 马好文, 钱波, 石峰. 分子印迹技术在催化领域应用研究进展[J]. 色谱, 2026, 44(1): 53-77. |
| [7] | 祝冉, 蔡甘萍, 郑海娇, 贾琼. 分子印迹技术在疾病诊断和治疗领域的研究进展[J]. 色谱, 2026, 44(1): 2-16. |
| [8] | 杨书凌, 曹玉, 何坤霖, 封顺, 张纯姑, 单连海. 铜介导的磁性表面分子印迹聚合物用于棉仁中棉酚的高效特异性分离[J]. 色谱, 2026, 44(1): 101-113. |
| [9] | 吴江毅, 黄晓佳. 电场辅助分子印迹技术进展[J]. 色谱, 2026, 44(1): 43-52. |
| [10] | 程云, 林宇乐, 田苗苗. 高容量双酚A分子印迹聚合物的可控合成及其在环境水样检测中的应用[J]. 色谱, 2026, 44(1): 92-100. |
| [11] | 袁雪婷, 王亮, 陈鲁茜, 胡良海. 靶向生物膜的分子印迹策略与进展[J]. 色谱, 2026, 44(1): 30-42. |
| [12] | 张军杰, 宋亚菲, 刘艳, 田雪蒙, 高瑞霞. 高降解效率分子印迹光催化剂的制备及其选择性降解性能[J]. 色谱, 2026, 44(1): 78-91. |
| [13] | 陈杰, 刘明亮, 武璐, 徐峰, 吕晶, 陈林海, 李伟, 符杰, 傅建捷. 水中有机磷酸二酯分析技术研究进展[J]. 色谱, 2025, 43(9): 987-995. |
| [14] | 程嘉雯, 朱家顺, 刘雅静, 华静, 李爽. 对苯二胺类橡胶防老剂及其醌类转化产物分析方法研究进展[J]. 色谱, 2025, 43(8): 868-880. |
| [15] | 黄晶滢, 闫敬怡, 齐骥, 陈令新, 李金花. 基于金属/共价有机框架分子印迹材料的固相萃取结合色谱/质谱在海岸带新污染物筛查识别中的应用[J]. 色谱, 2025, 43(8): 841-856. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||