Chinese Journal of Chromatography ›› 2021, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (9): 968-980.DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1123.2021.07005
• Reviews • Previous Articles Next Articles
CHEN Wenwen1,2, GAN Zhongqiao1,2, QIN Jianhua1,2,*()
Received:
2021-07-07
Online:
2021-09-08
Published:
2021-09-06
Contact:
QIN Jianhua
Supported by:
Separation method | Principles | Sample volume | Sample | Advantages | Disadvantages |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ultra-centrifugation | size, density | large | cell culture medium, urine, et al. | without additional reagents | time consuming, instrument dependent, high shear stress |
Ultrafilter | size | relatively large | cell culture medium, urine, et al. | without additional reagents | impurities with similar size, high shear stress |
Immunocapture | antigen-antibody reaction | relatively small | urine, blood, et al. | high specificity | expensive, rely heavily on specific antibodies |
Precipitation | protein-polymer reaction | large | cell culture medium, urine, et al. | cheap, easy to operate | polymer contamination, low recovery rate |
Microfluidic chip | according to different design | small | blood, urine, precise samples | fixable, integrable | small separation volume, complex fabrication |
Table 1 Comparison of different separation methods of exosomes
Separation method | Principles | Sample volume | Sample | Advantages | Disadvantages |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ultra-centrifugation | size, density | large | cell culture medium, urine, et al. | without additional reagents | time consuming, instrument dependent, high shear stress |
Ultrafilter | size | relatively large | cell culture medium, urine, et al. | without additional reagents | impurities with similar size, high shear stress |
Immunocapture | antigen-antibody reaction | relatively small | urine, blood, et al. | high specificity | expensive, rely heavily on specific antibodies |
Precipitation | protein-polymer reaction | large | cell culture medium, urine, et al. | cheap, easy to operate | polymer contamination, low recovery rate |
Microfluidic chip | according to different design | small | blood, urine, precise samples | fixable, integrable | small separation volume, complex fabrication |
Fig. 2 Exosome separation microfluidic chips based on nano-filters and nano-arrays a. isolation and detection of EVs from urine using an integrated double-filtration microfluidic device[29]; b. exodisc for rapid, size-selective, and efficient isolation and analysis of nanoscale extracellular vesicles from biological samples[30].
Fig. 3 Exosome separation microfluidic chips based on physical field Field-free isolation of exosomes from extracellular vesicles by microfluidic viscoelastic flows[36].
Fig. 4 Exosome separation chip based on immune capture on fixed base a. nano-interfaced microfluidic exosome platform (nano-IMEX)[39]; b. schematic illustration of the exosome capture and release using an exosome-specific dual-patterned immuno filtration (ExoDIF) device[40].
Fig. 5 Exosome separation chip based on immune capture on unfixed base a. exosome isolation and detection using rapid inertial solution exchange[47]; b. exosome separation chip based on magnetic nanoparticles[48].
Microfluidic technologies | Sample | Sample volume/μL | Recovery/ % | Time/ min | Isolated size/nm | Ref. | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Based on physical characteristics of exosomes | |||||||
Membrane filtration | |||||||
Exodisc: double membranes | urine | 1000 | >95 | 30 | 20-600 | [ | |
ExoTIC: multi-membranes | culture media, plasma, urine | 5000 | >90 | 60 | ~30-100 | [ | |
Nano-column arrays | |||||||
Nano-DLD sorting | urine, serum | 900 | ~50 | 60 | ~30-200 | [ | |
Ciliated micropillar array | liposomes | 100 | ~60 | 10 | ~30-200 | [ | |
Physical field | |||||||
Acoustofluidic collection | human whole blood | 500 | 99 | 50 | ~100 | [ | |
Electric field | mouse whole blood | 1000 | 65 | 50 | ~10-400 | [ | |
Viscoelastic flow | fetal bovine serum | 100 | 93.6 | 10 | <200 | [ | |
Based on biochemical characteristics of exosomes | |||||||
Immune capture on fixed base | |||||||
SPRi antibody microarray | cell culture media | 300 | N/A | 1 | ~70 | [ | |
Nano-IMEX | plasma | 20 | ~80 | 40 | <150 | [ | |
-COCEVHB-chip | plasma | 1000 | 94 | 60 | ~100 | [ | |
ZnO chip | cell culture media, blood | 100 | >70 | 10 | 30-150 | [ | |
Immune capture on unfixed base | |||||||
ExoSearch chip: magnetic beads | plasma | 1000 | ~79.7 | 10 | <150 | [ | |
Polystyrene beads | cell culture media | 700 | N/A | 10 | 60-90 | [ | |
ExoTENPO chip: magnetic nanoparticles | plasma | 10000 | N/A | 60 | ~138-161 | [ |
Table 2 Exosome separation methods based on microfluidic chip
Microfluidic technologies | Sample | Sample volume/μL | Recovery/ % | Time/ min | Isolated size/nm | Ref. | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Based on physical characteristics of exosomes | |||||||
Membrane filtration | |||||||
Exodisc: double membranes | urine | 1000 | >95 | 30 | 20-600 | [ | |
ExoTIC: multi-membranes | culture media, plasma, urine | 5000 | >90 | 60 | ~30-100 | [ | |
Nano-column arrays | |||||||
Nano-DLD sorting | urine, serum | 900 | ~50 | 60 | ~30-200 | [ | |
Ciliated micropillar array | liposomes | 100 | ~60 | 10 | ~30-200 | [ | |
Physical field | |||||||
Acoustofluidic collection | human whole blood | 500 | 99 | 50 | ~100 | [ | |
Electric field | mouse whole blood | 1000 | 65 | 50 | ~10-400 | [ | |
Viscoelastic flow | fetal bovine serum | 100 | 93.6 | 10 | <200 | [ | |
Based on biochemical characteristics of exosomes | |||||||
Immune capture on fixed base | |||||||
SPRi antibody microarray | cell culture media | 300 | N/A | 1 | ~70 | [ | |
Nano-IMEX | plasma | 20 | ~80 | 40 | <150 | [ | |
-COCEVHB-chip | plasma | 1000 | 94 | 60 | ~100 | [ | |
ZnO chip | cell culture media, blood | 100 | >70 | 10 | 30-150 | [ | |
Immune capture on unfixed base | |||||||
ExoSearch chip: magnetic beads | plasma | 1000 | ~79.7 | 10 | <150 | [ | |
Polystyrene beads | cell culture media | 700 | N/A | 10 | 60-90 | [ | |
ExoTENPO chip: magnetic nanoparticles | plasma | 10000 | N/A | 60 | ~138-161 | [ |
Analysis method | Principles | Analysis objects | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|
Microscopy | the reaction between samples and electrons or detection | size, morphology | [ |
probes | |||
Light scattering | change of light scattering intensity | size distribution | [ |
TRPS | change of conductivity | size, concentration, zeta potential | [ |
Antibody detection | antigen-antibody reaction | proteins | [ |
Nano-FCM | the scattering light and fluorescent light of detected cells | size, biochemical characterization | [ |
Table 3 Comparison of different analysis methods of exosomes
Analysis method | Principles | Analysis objects | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|
Microscopy | the reaction between samples and electrons or detection | size, morphology | [ |
probes | |||
Light scattering | change of light scattering intensity | size distribution | [ |
TRPS | change of conductivity | size, concentration, zeta potential | [ |
Antibody detection | antigen-antibody reaction | proteins | [ |
Nano-FCM | the scattering light and fluorescent light of detected cells | size, biochemical characterization | [ |
Fig. 6 Detection of exosomes by microfluidic chip combined with fluorescence detection a. hydrodynamic fluorescence analysis of exosomes based on microfluidic control[50]; b. dynamic fluorescence detection of exosomes in the process of elution on microfluidic chip[76].
Fig. 7 Exosomes detection by electrochemical sensor Magnetic-based microfluidic device for on-chip isolation and detection of tumor-derived exosomes[84].
|
[1] | HUANG Jianying, XIA Ling, XIAO Xiaohua, LI Gongke. Advances in microchip electrophoresis for the separation and analysis of biological samples [J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2023, 41(8): 641-650. |
[2] | ZHAO Yuan, LIU Xin, ZHANG Yidan, ZHANG Jian, LIU Xiang, YANG Guofeng. Tandem mass tag-based quantitative proteomics analysis of plasma and plasma exosomes in Parkinson’s disease [J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2023, 41(12): 1073-1083. |
[3] | CAO Rongkai, ZHANG Min, YU Hao, QIN Jianhua. Recent advances in isolation and detection of circulating tumor cells with a microfluidic system [J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2022, 40(3): 213-223. |
[4] | GUO Minkang, ZHANG Jian. Lipid metabolomic analysis in exosomes of osteonecrosis of the femoral head based on ultra performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry [J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2022, 40(2): 123-129. |
[5] | JIA Pu, BIAN Yangyang, BAI Yajun, MENG Xue, GAO Shuomo, ZHAO Ye, CAI Yujie, ZHENG Xiaohui. Applications of chromatography in giant complex drug-organism system [J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2021, 39(9): 950-957. |
[6] | WEN Hanrong, ZHU Jue, ZHANG Bo. Recent advances in microchip liquid chromatography [J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2021, 39(4): 357-367. |
[7] | ZHANG Weibing, LU Rui, ZHANG Lingyi. Preparation of dual-functional composite magnetic nanomaterials modified with different metals/aptamers and their performance in exosome enrichment [J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2021, 39(10): 1128-1136. |
[8] | ZHANG Hanqing, QIN Weijie, ZHANG Yangjun. Preparation of 4-mercaptophenylboronic acid functionalized two-dimensional molybdenum disulfide nanocomposite and its specific enrichment for N-glycopeptide [J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2020, 38(8): 891-899. |
[9] | XIA Hongjun, LIU Jiawei, BAI Quan. Research progress on core-shell silica stationary phases for high performance liquid chromatography [J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2020, 38(4): 372-382. |
[10] | FANG Hongxia, QIAN Chen, CUI Peng, LIU Jingfeng, HU Xiaopo, HE Hualong, SUN Jiying. A rapid method based on advanced polymer chromatography for analyzing the products of the acid-catalyzed depolymerization of lignosulfonate [J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2019, 37(9): 983-989. |
[11] | HUO Chunhui, LI Yinghua, QIAO Zhi, SHANG Zhi, CAO Chengxi, HONG Yang, XIAO Hua. Proteomics analysis of serum exosomes and its application in osteoporosis [J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2019, 37(8): 863-871. |
[12] | WENG Yejing, SUI Zhigang, ZHANG Lihua, ZHANG Yukui. Recent advances on exosomes isolation methods and proteomic analysis [J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2016, 34(12): 1131-1136. |
[13] | YIN Fangchao, WEN Hui, ZHU Guoli, QIN Jianhua. Advances of Caenorhabditis elegans research on microfluidic device [J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2016, 34(11): 1031-1042. |
[14] | XIAO Zhiliang, ZHANG Bo*. Droplet microfluidics: technologies and applications [J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2011, 29(10): 949-956. |
[15] | CHEN Yi, LI Jincheng. Photonic crystals for analytical chemistry [J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2009, 27(5): 573-583. |
Viewed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Full text 288
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||