Chinese Journal of Chromatography ›› 2022, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (4): 372-383.DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1123.2021.09005
• Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
LI Junhao1,2, HAN Guanhua1,2, LIN Xiaotao2, WU Liqiang2, QIAN Chungen2, XU Junfa1,*()
Received:
2021-09-05
Online:
2022-04-08
Published:
2021-11-24
Contact:
XU Junfa
Supported by:
CLC Number:
LI Junhao, HAN Guanhua, LIN Xiaotao, WU Liqiang, QIAN Chungen, XU Junfa. Application of magnetic immunofluorescence assay based on microfluidic technology to detection of Epstein-Barr virus[J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2022, 40(4): 372-383.
Fig. 1 Schematic diagram of the two-dimensional (2D) structure of the chip a. 0.4 mm polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA); b. 0.4 mm PMMA and 1.0 mm silicone gasket, and back surface with pressure sensitive adhesive (PSA); c. 0.4 mm PMMA and back surface with PSA; d. front and back surface with PSA and 1.5 mm PMMA; e. 0.4 mm PMMA.
Fig. 2 Three-dimensional (3D) structure of the chip a. 3D explosion view, the exploded view drawing of panel displays the interactive control layer (a1), chamber storage layer (a2), fluid channel layer (a3), flexible valve layer (a4), and the top layer (a5); b. 3D structure view; c. view of the flexible valve 3D structure; d. schematic diagram of the flexible valve.
Fig. 4 Schematic diagram of chip detection process a. first incubation step; b. second incubation step; c. cleaning step; d. detection step; for information on No. 1-18, see Table 1.
Stage | Number in | Rotational speed/(r/min) | t/s | Control | Specification |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
First incubation | 1 | - | - | - | sampling |
2 | 500 | 10 | valve close | sample guiding | |
3 | 800 | 10 | valve close | sample aliquoting | |
4 | 500 | 300 | valve close | reacting (bi-directional running with 120°) | |
5 | 800 | 10 | magnetic beads accumulation; valve open | draining | |
Second incubation | 6 | - | - | magnetic beads re-suspension; valve close | adding deionized water (DW) |
7 | 300 | 10 | valve close | DW guiding | |
8 | 500 | 10 | valve close | DW guiding | |
9 | 800 | 10 | valve close | DW aliquoting | |
10 | 500 | 300 | valve close | reacting (bi-directional running with 120°) | |
11 | 800 | 10 | magnetic beads accumulation; valve open | draining | |
Cleaning | 12 | - | - | magnetic beads re-suspension; valve close | adding cleaning buffer (CB) |
13 | 300 | 10 | valve close | CB guiding | |
14 | 500 | 10 | valve close | CB guiding | |
15 | 800 | 10 | valve close | CB aliquoting | |
16 | 500 | 300 | valve close | cleaning (bi-directional running with 120°) | |
17 | 800 | 10 | magnetic beads accumulation; valve open | draining | |
Detection | 18 | - | - | - | signal collecting |
Table 1 Control procedure of chip detection process
Stage | Number in | Rotational speed/(r/min) | t/s | Control | Specification |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
First incubation | 1 | - | - | - | sampling |
2 | 500 | 10 | valve close | sample guiding | |
3 | 800 | 10 | valve close | sample aliquoting | |
4 | 500 | 300 | valve close | reacting (bi-directional running with 120°) | |
5 | 800 | 10 | magnetic beads accumulation; valve open | draining | |
Second incubation | 6 | - | - | magnetic beads re-suspension; valve close | adding deionized water (DW) |
7 | 300 | 10 | valve close | DW guiding | |
8 | 500 | 10 | valve close | DW guiding | |
9 | 800 | 10 | valve close | DW aliquoting | |
10 | 500 | 300 | valve close | reacting (bi-directional running with 120°) | |
11 | 800 | 10 | magnetic beads accumulation; valve open | draining | |
Cleaning | 12 | - | - | magnetic beads re-suspension; valve close | adding cleaning buffer (CB) |
13 | 300 | 10 | valve close | CB guiding | |
14 | 500 | 10 | valve close | CB guiding | |
15 | 800 | 10 | valve close | CB aliquoting | |
16 | 500 | 300 | valve close | cleaning (bi-directional running with 120°) | |
17 | 800 | 10 | magnetic beads accumulation; valve open | draining | |
Detection | 18 | - | - | - | signal collecting |
Channel location | Maximum channel depth/μm | Channel cross-sectional area/μm2 |
---|---|---|
Between sampling pool and liquid separation pool | 93.51±2.94 | 15935.2±712.5 |
Between fluorescent bead pool and liquid separation pool | 96.44±3.28 | 16718.7±654.6 |
Between left fluid sac pool and fluorescent bead pool | 92.43±3.66 | 15502.3±857.4 |
Between detection pool and waste liquid pool | 96.93±2.78 | 16614.1±811.3 |
Table 2 Maximum depth and cross-sectional area of each channel
Channel location | Maximum channel depth/μm | Channel cross-sectional area/μm2 |
---|---|---|
Between sampling pool and liquid separation pool | 93.51±2.94 | 15935.2±712.5 |
Between fluorescent bead pool and liquid separation pool | 96.44±3.28 | 16718.7±654.6 |
Between left fluid sac pool and fluorescent bead pool | 92.43±3.66 | 15502.3±857.4 |
Between detection pool and waste liquid pool | 96.93±2.78 | 16614.1±811.3 |
Item | Normal serum sample number | Positive serum sample number | OOP/(U/mL) | Sensitivity/% | Specificity/% | AUC |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EB VCA IgG | 46 | 75 | 9.97 | 93.3 | 91.3 | 0.9788 |
EB VCA IgA | 70 | 51 | 9.95 | 92.2 | 92.9 | 0.9784 |
EB NA1 IgG | 51 | 70 | 9.97 | 94.3 | 90.2 | 0.9672 |
EB NA1 IgA | 52 | 69 | 10.05 | 90.4 | 92.8 | 0.9727 |
Table 3 Optimal operating point (OOP), sensitivity, specificity, area under curve (AUC), and reference sample number under the ROC curve
Item | Normal serum sample number | Positive serum sample number | OOP/(U/mL) | Sensitivity/% | Specificity/% | AUC |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EB VCA IgG | 46 | 75 | 9.97 | 93.3 | 91.3 | 0.9788 |
EB VCA IgA | 70 | 51 | 9.95 | 92.2 | 92.9 | 0.9784 |
EB NA1 IgG | 51 | 70 | 9.97 | 94.3 | 90.2 | 0.9672 |
EB NA1 IgA | 52 | 69 | 10.05 | 90.4 | 92.8 | 0.9727 |
Item | Regression equation | R2 | Linear range/ (U/mL) | LOD/ (U/mL) |
---|---|---|---|---|
EB VCA IgG | Y=0.8532X+9.044 | 0.9984 | 1.92-200 | 1.92 |
EB VCA IgA | Y=1.150X+9.354 | 0.9958 | 2.79-200 | 2.79 |
EB NA1 IgG | Y=1.127X+7.172 | 0.9986 | 3.13-200 | 3.13 |
EB NA1 IgA | Y=1.191X+14.77 | 0.9952 | 1.53-200 | 1.53 |
Table 4 Linear relationship of dose response and LOD of each item
Item | Regression equation | R2 | Linear range/ (U/mL) | LOD/ (U/mL) |
---|---|---|---|---|
EB VCA IgG | Y=0.8532X+9.044 | 0.9984 | 1.92-200 | 1.92 |
EB VCA IgA | Y=1.150X+9.354 | 0.9958 | 2.79-200 | 2.79 |
EB NA1 IgG | Y=1.127X+7.172 | 0.9986 | 3.13-200 | 3.13 |
EB NA1 IgA | Y=1.191X+14.77 | 0.9952 | 1.53-200 | 1.53 |
Sample No. | EB VCA IgG | EB NA1 IgG | EB VCA IgA | EB NA1 IgA | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Average/(U/mL) | RSD/% | Average/(U/mL) | RSD/% | Average/(U/mL) | RSD/% | Average/(U/mL) | RSD/% | ||||
1 | 17.36 | 2.86 | 19.21 | 4.7 | 15.18 | 6.54 | 22.56 | 4.02 | |||
2 | 135.8 | 4.17 | 73.67 | 5.2 | 96.98 | 5.83 | 100.12 | 5.5 |
Table 5 Repeatability test results of each item (n=10)
Sample No. | EB VCA IgG | EB NA1 IgG | EB VCA IgA | EB NA1 IgA | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Average/(U/mL) | RSD/% | Average/(U/mL) | RSD/% | Average/(U/mL) | RSD/% | Average/(U/mL) | RSD/% | ||||
1 | 17.36 | 2.86 | 19.21 | 4.7 | 15.18 | 6.54 | 22.56 | 4.02 | |||
2 | 135.8 | 4.17 | 73.67 | 5.2 | 96.98 | 5.83 | 100.12 | 5.5 |
Item | Coincident rate | Kappa | |
---|---|---|---|
Positive | Negative | ||
EB VCA IgG | 95.8% (68/71) | 86.0% (43/50) | 0.828 |
EB NA IgG | 92.0% (46/50) | 93.0% (66/71) | 0.847 |
EB VCA IgA | 93.0% (66/71) | 92.0% (46/50) | 0.847 |
EB NA IgA | 90.0% (45/50) | 91.6% (65/71) | 0.813 |
Table 6 Methodological comparison and Kappa valve of each item
Item | Coincident rate | Kappa | |
---|---|---|---|
Positive | Negative | ||
EB VCA IgG | 95.8% (68/71) | 86.0% (43/50) | 0.828 |
EB NA IgG | 92.0% (46/50) | 93.0% (66/71) | 0.847 |
EB VCA IgA | 93.0% (66/71) | 92.0% (46/50) | 0.847 |
EB NA IgA | 90.0% (45/50) | 91.6% (65/71) | 0.813 |
Item | Difference vs. average | Ratio vs. average |
---|---|---|
EB VCA IgG | 8.3% (10/121) | 0 (0/121) |
EB VCA IgA | 6.6% (8/121) | 0 (0/121) |
EB VCA IgG | 7.4% (9/121) | 1.7% (2/121) |
EB VCA IgG | 8.3% (10/121) | 0 (0/121) |
Table 7 Sample proportion above the 95% confidence interval of Bland-Altman of each item
Item | Difference vs. average | Ratio vs. average |
---|---|---|
EB VCA IgG | 8.3% (10/121) | 0 (0/121) |
EB VCA IgA | 6.6% (8/121) | 0 (0/121) |
EB VCA IgG | 7.4% (9/121) | 1.7% (2/121) |
EB VCA IgG | 8.3% (10/121) | 0 (0/121) |
Material | Category | Cost/Yuan | Total/Yuan | Specification |
---|---|---|---|---|
Chip sheet | chip material | 5-7 | 8.68-11.18 | price from large production (10000+) |
PSA | chip material | 1-1.5 | price from large production (10000+) | |
Magnetic beads | reagent material | 0.2×4 | price from commercial products | |
Fluorescent micro-particles | reagent material | 0.08×4 | price from commercial products | |
Antigen (EB VCA and EB NA1) | reagent material | (0.3+0.35)×2 | 0.3 for EB VCA and 0.35 for EB NA1, both from | |
commercial products | ||||
Antibody (anti-human IgA and | reagent material | (0.03+0.1)×2 | 0.03 for anti-human IgG and 0.1 for anti-human | |
anti-human IgG) | IgA, both from commercial products | |||
Centrifuge module | instrument material | 2500-3000 | 6000-7500 | price from commercial products |
Microscope module | instrument material | 2000-2500 | price from commercial products | |
Fixation module | instrument material | 300-400 | price from commercial products | |
Valve control module | instrument material | 300-400 | price from commercial products | |
Magnet control module | instrument material | 600-800 | price from commercial products | |
Software | 300-400 | price from YHLO |
Table 8 Cost list of chips, reagents, and instruments
Material | Category | Cost/Yuan | Total/Yuan | Specification |
---|---|---|---|---|
Chip sheet | chip material | 5-7 | 8.68-11.18 | price from large production (10000+) |
PSA | chip material | 1-1.5 | price from large production (10000+) | |
Magnetic beads | reagent material | 0.2×4 | price from commercial products | |
Fluorescent micro-particles | reagent material | 0.08×4 | price from commercial products | |
Antigen (EB VCA and EB NA1) | reagent material | (0.3+0.35)×2 | 0.3 for EB VCA and 0.35 for EB NA1, both from | |
commercial products | ||||
Antibody (anti-human IgA and | reagent material | (0.03+0.1)×2 | 0.03 for anti-human IgG and 0.1 for anti-human | |
anti-human IgG) | IgA, both from commercial products | |||
Centrifuge module | instrument material | 2500-3000 | 6000-7500 | price from commercial products |
Microscope module | instrument material | 2000-2500 | price from commercial products | |
Fixation module | instrument material | 300-400 | price from commercial products | |
Valve control module | instrument material | 300-400 | price from commercial products | |
Magnet control module | instrument material | 600-800 | price from commercial products | |
Software | 300-400 | price from YHLO |
|
[1] | ZHAO Mengqian, LIU Haitao, ZHANG Xu, GAN Zhongqiao, QIN Jianhua. One-step generation of droplet-filled hydrogel microfibers for 3D cell culture using an all-aqueous microfluidic system [J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2023, 41(9): 742-751. |
[2] | MI Kun, ZHANG Wentian, WEN Luhong, WANG Jin. Rapid detection of four amphetamine-type drugs in hair by pulsed direct current electrospray mass spectrometry [J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2023, 41(12): 1141-1148. |
[3] | XIONG Shiling, HONG Huanhuan, WEN Luhong, HU Shundi, CHEN Anqi, XIONG Wei, CHEN La. Detection of drugs in urine by ambient direct ionization mass spectrometry [J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2022, 40(7): 677-683. |
[4] | CAO Rongkai, ZHANG Min, YU Hao, QIN Jianhua. Recent advances in isolation and detection of circulating tumor cells with a microfluidic system [J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2022, 40(3): 213-223. |
[5] | CHEN Wenwen, GAN Zhongqiao, QIN Jianhua. Microfluidic strategies for separation and analysis of circulating exosomes [J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2021, 39(9): 968-980. |
[6] | MA Jiaxin, LIAN Ziru, HE Cheng, WANG Jiangtao, YU Rencheng. Application of novel quantum dot-based molecularly imprinted fluorescence sensor in rapid detection [J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2021, 39(8): 775-780. |
[7] | ZHANG Yu, QI Ji, LIU Feng, WANG Ning, SUN Xiyan, CUI Rong, YU Jialuo, YE Jiaming, LIU Ping, LI Bowei, CHEN Lingxin. Applications of microfluidic paper-based chips in environmental analysis and detection [J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2021, 39(8): 802-815. |
[8] | LIANG Yixiao, PAN Jianzhang, FANG Qun. Research advances of high-throughput cell-based drug screening systems based on microfluidic technique [J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2021, 39(6): 567-577. |
[9] | WEN Hanrong, ZHU Jue, ZHANG Bo. Recent advances in microchip liquid chromatography [J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2021, 39(4): 357-367. |
[10] | QIN Shaojie, BAI Yu, LIU Huwei. Methods and applications of single-cell proteomics analysis based on mass spectrometry [J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2021, 39(2): 142-151. |
[11] | CUI Jiaxuan, LIU Lu, LI Donghao, PIAO Xiangfan. Research progress in the application of external field separation technology and microfluidic technology in the separation of micro/nanoscales [J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2021, 39(11): 1157-1170. |
[12] | ZHANG Hongyan, SHI Xiaofeng, QIU Guoyu, WANG Xiaoqiao, ZHANG Caixia, ZHANG Xiaoping, WU Fuxiang, XU Xiaohui, LI Chenxi, PAN Xiuli. Rapid screening of illegally added poppy husk in hot pot sauce and soup by thermal desorption electrospray ionization-triple quadruple mass spectrometry [J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2020, 38(7): 861-867. |
[13] | YUAN Yingxin, FAN Chen, PAN Jianzhang, FANG Qun. Research advances in clinical biochemical analysis systems based on microfluidic driving and control technique [J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2020, 38(2): 183-194. |
[14] | Wenwei WU, Yi WANG, Kexin LIU, Tiansong LI, Yongjie YANG. Simultaneous and rapid determination of malachite green and leucomalachite green by a label-free colorimetric aptasensor [J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2020, 38(11): 1332-1339. |
[15] | LIU Yulan, CHEN Yali, XIAO Xiaohua, XIA Ling, LI Gongke. Research progress of electrically-driven force based online rapid separation and enrichment techniques [J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2020, 38(10): 1197-1205. |
Viewed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Full text 166
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract 229
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||