Chinese Journal of Chromatography ›› 2026, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (10): 1233-1242.DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1123.2026.01034
• Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
LI Sainan1, YIN Xiaoju1, LIU Jiawei1,*(
), YANG Yang2,*(
), BAI Quan1
Received:2026-01-30
Online:2026-10-08
Published:2026-10-13
Supported by:CLC Number:
LI Sainan, YIN Xiaoju, LIU Jiawei, YANG Yang, BAI Quan. Fluorine-functionalized zirconium-based metal-organic framework immobilized thin film microextraction array for high-throughput analysis of glyphosate residues[J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2026, 44(10): 1233-1242.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.chrom-china.com/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1123.2026.01034
Fig. 2 (a) FT-IR spectra and (b) XRD patterns of UiO-66-F4 and UiO-66-F4/PAN coating; (c) nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherms and (d) pore size distribution of UiO-66-F4
Fig. 3 (a) Adsorption time profile and (b) Langmuir model fitting of adsorption isotherm of glyphosate on UiO-66-F4Adsorption conditions: adsorbent dosage, 5 mg; sample volume, 4 mL; sample pH, 5.
Fig. 5 Effects of (a) pH and (b) salt amount of sample solution, and (c) extraction time on the extraction performances of glyphosate on the UiO-66-F4/PAN coatings (n=3)
Fig. 6 Effects of (a) type of eluent and (b) elution time on the desorption of glyphosate (n=3)1. 5% (V/V) ammonia aqueous solution; 2. 1% (V/V) triethylamine aqueous solution; 3. 3% (V/V) triethylamine aqueous solution; 4. 5% (V/V) triethylamine aqueous solution; 5. 7% (V/V) triethylamine aqueous solution.
| Sample matrix | Method | Adsorptive phase | Analytical performances | Pretreatment time | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Commercial baby foods | DSPE-CE-MS | CSMS@TiO2 | linear range: 2‒1 000 ng/mL, LOD: 0.5 ng/mL, recovery: 82.3%‒102.6%, RSD: 2.1%‒8.3% | 50 min | [ |
| Sediment | SPE-UPLC-MS/MS | PRiME HLB column | linear range: 2.0‒200 ng/mL, LOD: 10 ng/g, recovery: 76.4%‒88.8%, RSD: 3.92%‒8.20% | NA | [ |
| Water, soil and vegetable | MSPE-HPLC | MIH-MIP | linear range: 72‒2 000 ng/mL, LOD: 21 ng/mL, recovery: 88%‒118%, RSD: 2%‒9% | 2.3 min | [ |
| Tea | SPE-LC-MS/MS | DMIP | linear range: 50‒4 000 ng/mL, LOD: 2.8 ng/mL, recovery: 98.69%‒106.26%, RSD: 0.91%‒1.81% | NA | [ |
| Environmental water and honey | MIP-SPE-HPLC | AFFINIMIP® SPE cartridge | linear range: 0.25‒5 ng/mL, LOD: 0.31 ng/mL, recovery: 97.6%‒103%, RSD: 0.29%‒6.78% | 30 min | [ |
| Environmental water | MSPE-UPLC-MS | PSA@Zr-MOF@Fe3O4 | linear range: 1.0‒100 ng/mL, LOD: 0.02 ng/mL, recovery: 86.3%‒92.1%, RSD: 1.2%‒7.2% | 10 min | [ |
| Plant commodities | Online SPE-LC-MS/MS | ZrO2 | linear range: 2‒2 000 ng/mL, LOD: NA, recovery: 80%‒120%, RSD: 0.8%‒12.8% | 35 min | [ |
| River water and orange | TFME-UPLC-MS/MS | UiO-66-F4 | linear range: 0.5‒500 ng/mL, LOD: 0.12 ng/mL, recovery: 88.1%‒107.1%, RSD: 0.7%‒8.1% | 160 min for 96 sample, 1.7 min for per sample | this work |
Table 1 Comparison of the developed method with other reported methods
| Sample matrix | Method | Adsorptive phase | Analytical performances | Pretreatment time | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Commercial baby foods | DSPE-CE-MS | CSMS@TiO2 | linear range: 2‒1 000 ng/mL, LOD: 0.5 ng/mL, recovery: 82.3%‒102.6%, RSD: 2.1%‒8.3% | 50 min | [ |
| Sediment | SPE-UPLC-MS/MS | PRiME HLB column | linear range: 2.0‒200 ng/mL, LOD: 10 ng/g, recovery: 76.4%‒88.8%, RSD: 3.92%‒8.20% | NA | [ |
| Water, soil and vegetable | MSPE-HPLC | MIH-MIP | linear range: 72‒2 000 ng/mL, LOD: 21 ng/mL, recovery: 88%‒118%, RSD: 2%‒9% | 2.3 min | [ |
| Tea | SPE-LC-MS/MS | DMIP | linear range: 50‒4 000 ng/mL, LOD: 2.8 ng/mL, recovery: 98.69%‒106.26%, RSD: 0.91%‒1.81% | NA | [ |
| Environmental water and honey | MIP-SPE-HPLC | AFFINIMIP® SPE cartridge | linear range: 0.25‒5 ng/mL, LOD: 0.31 ng/mL, recovery: 97.6%‒103%, RSD: 0.29%‒6.78% | 30 min | [ |
| Environmental water | MSPE-UPLC-MS | PSA@Zr-MOF@Fe3O4 | linear range: 1.0‒100 ng/mL, LOD: 0.02 ng/mL, recovery: 86.3%‒92.1%, RSD: 1.2%‒7.2% | 10 min | [ |
| Plant commodities | Online SPE-LC-MS/MS | ZrO2 | linear range: 2‒2 000 ng/mL, LOD: NA, recovery: 80%‒120%, RSD: 0.8%‒12.8% | 35 min | [ |
| River water and orange | TFME-UPLC-MS/MS | UiO-66-F4 | linear range: 0.5‒500 ng/mL, LOD: 0.12 ng/mL, recovery: 88.1%‒107.1%, RSD: 0.7%‒8.1% | 160 min for 96 sample, 1.7 min for per sample | this work |
| Sample | Found | Low | Medium | High | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recovery/% | RSD/% | Recovery/% | RSD/% | Recovery/% | RSD/% | ||
| Orange pulp | N.D. | 101.4 | 3.1 | 92.5 | 5.0 | 90.5 | 2.7 |
| Orange peel | (1.7±0.7) ng/g | 88.1 | 5.4 | 95.7 | 8.1 | 98.3 | 4.5 |
| River water | (1.2±0.5) ng/mL | 96.1 | 2.1 | 107.1 | 2.5 | 101.6 | 0.7 |
Table 2 Detection results of glyphosate in oranges and irrigation river water, and spiked recoveries and precisions (RSDs) at the three levels (n=3)
| Sample | Found | Low | Medium | High | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recovery/% | RSD/% | Recovery/% | RSD/% | Recovery/% | RSD/% | ||
| Orange pulp | N.D. | 101.4 | 3.1 | 92.5 | 5.0 | 90.5 | 2.7 |
| Orange peel | (1.7±0.7) ng/g | 88.1 | 5.4 | 95.7 | 8.1 | 98.3 | 4.5 |
| River water | (1.2±0.5) ng/mL | 96.1 | 2.1 | 107.1 | 2.5 | 101.6 | 0.7 |
|
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||