Chinese Journal of Chromatography ›› 2021, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (3): 316-323.DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1123.2020.06007
• Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
YAN Meng, JIA Yeqing, QI Peiru, WANG Yahui, JI Qianqian, WANG Manman, WANG Qian, HAO Yulan*(
)
Received:2020-06-03
Online:2021-03-08
Published:2021-02-03
Contact:
HAO Yulan
Supported by:CLC Number:
YAN Meng, JIA Yeqing, QI Peiru, WANG Yahui, JI Qianqian, WANG Manman, WANG Qian, HAO Yulan. Determination of three diphenyl ether herbicides in rice by magnetic solid phase extraction using Fe3O4@MOF-808 coupled with high performance liquid chromatography[J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2021, 39(3): 316-323.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.chrom-china.com/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1123.2020.06007
| Analyte | Linear range/ (μg/L) | Regression equation | r | LOD/ (μg/kg) | LOQ/ (μg/kg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BIF | 2-300 | y=56.804x-1.0564 | 0.9992 | 0.4 | 1.5 |
| OXY | 2-300 | y=52.783x-0.3415 | 0.9991 | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| NIT | 2-300 | y=55.413x+0.0566 | 0.9984 | 0.6 | 2.0 |
Table 1 Linear ranges, LODs and LOQs of the three Des
| Analyte | Linear range/ (μg/L) | Regression equation | r | LOD/ (μg/kg) | LOQ/ (μg/kg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BIF | 2-300 | y=56.804x-1.0564 | 0.9992 | 0.4 | 1.5 |
| OXY | 2-300 | y=52.783x-0.3415 | 0.9991 | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| NIT | 2-300 | y=55.413x+0.0566 | 0.9984 | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| Analyte | Spiked/ (μg/kg) | Recovery/ % | RSDs/% | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intra-day | Inter-day | ||||
| BIF | 5 | 89.8 | 5.8 | 9.1 | |
| 10 | 93.1 | 6.2 | 8.6 | ||
| 20 | 96.7 | 4.1 | 7.5 | ||
| OXY | 5 | 91.6 | 7.4 | 9.3 | |
| 10 | 93.5 | 3.6 | 4.2 | ||
| 20 | 94.5 | 2.9 | 5.8 | ||
| NIT | 5 | 87.3 | 8.2 | 10.8 | |
| 10 | 91.4 | 6.5 | 9.3 | ||
| 20 | 95.7 | 4.2 | 6.7 | ||
Table 2 Recoveries and precisions of this method (n=3)
| Analyte | Spiked/ (μg/kg) | Recovery/ % | RSDs/% | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intra-day | Inter-day | ||||
| BIF | 5 | 89.8 | 5.8 | 9.1 | |
| 10 | 93.1 | 6.2 | 8.6 | ||
| 20 | 96.7 | 4.1 | 7.5 | ||
| OXY | 5 | 91.6 | 7.4 | 9.3 | |
| 10 | 93.5 | 3.6 | 4.2 | ||
| 20 | 94.5 | 2.9 | 5.8 | ||
| NIT | 5 | 87.3 | 8.2 | 10.8 | |
| 10 | 91.4 | 6.5 | 9.3 | ||
| 20 | 95.7 | 4.2 | 6.7 | ||
| Sample | Analyte | Found/(μg/kg) | Recovery/% | RSD/% (n=3) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BIF | N. D. | 87.6 | 6.2 |
| OXY | N. D. | 90.3 | 4.1 | |
| NIT | N. D. | 88.6 | 9.3 | |
| 2 | BIF | N. D. | 89.3 | 7.2 |
| OXY | N. D. | 92.5 | 4.6 | |
| NIT | N. D. | 90.4 | 5.8 | |
| 3 | BIF | N. D. | 91.3 | 2.9 |
| OXY | N. D. | 93.7 | 3.1 | |
| NIT | N. D. | 90.4 | 5.4 | |
| 4 | BIF | N. D. | 88.8 | 10.1 |
| OXY | N. D. | 92.5 | 6.5 | |
| NIT | N. D. | 91.7 | 5.7 | |
| 5 | BIF | N. D. | 92.6 | 1.8 |
| OXY | N. D. | 89.7 | 3.5 | |
| NIT | N. D. | 95.4 | 4.2 | |
| 6 | BIF | N. D. | 91.7 | 4.8 |
| OXY | N. D. | 91.3 | 6.9 | |
| NIT | N. D. | 90.2 | 10.5 | |
| 7 | BIF | N. D. | 90.5 | 9.1 |
| OXY | N. D. | 92.5 | 5.6 | |
| NIT | N. D. | 89.1 | 1.8 | |
| 8 | BIF | N. D. | 85.7 | 2.7 |
| OXY | N. D. | 91.3 | 3.4 | |
| NIT | N. D. | 88.6 | 8.3 | |
| 9 | BIF | N. D. | 94.5 | 6.2 |
| OXY | N. D. | 92.6 | 3.0 | |
| NIT | N. D. | 89.6 | 7.7 | |
| 10 | BIF | N. D. | 92.5 | 3.9 |
| OXY | N. D. | 90.6 | 4.5 | |
| NIT | N. D. | 91.3 | 11.3 |
Table 3 Analytical results and spiked recoveries for the determination of three Des in rice samples
| Sample | Analyte | Found/(μg/kg) | Recovery/% | RSD/% (n=3) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BIF | N. D. | 87.6 | 6.2 |
| OXY | N. D. | 90.3 | 4.1 | |
| NIT | N. D. | 88.6 | 9.3 | |
| 2 | BIF | N. D. | 89.3 | 7.2 |
| OXY | N. D. | 92.5 | 4.6 | |
| NIT | N. D. | 90.4 | 5.8 | |
| 3 | BIF | N. D. | 91.3 | 2.9 |
| OXY | N. D. | 93.7 | 3.1 | |
| NIT | N. D. | 90.4 | 5.4 | |
| 4 | BIF | N. D. | 88.8 | 10.1 |
| OXY | N. D. | 92.5 | 6.5 | |
| NIT | N. D. | 91.7 | 5.7 | |
| 5 | BIF | N. D. | 92.6 | 1.8 |
| OXY | N. D. | 89.7 | 3.5 | |
| NIT | N. D. | 95.4 | 4.2 | |
| 6 | BIF | N. D. | 91.7 | 4.8 |
| OXY | N. D. | 91.3 | 6.9 | |
| NIT | N. D. | 90.2 | 10.5 | |
| 7 | BIF | N. D. | 90.5 | 9.1 |
| OXY | N. D. | 92.5 | 5.6 | |
| NIT | N. D. | 89.1 | 1.8 | |
| 8 | BIF | N. D. | 85.7 | 2.7 |
| OXY | N. D. | 91.3 | 3.4 | |
| NIT | N. D. | 88.6 | 8.3 | |
| 9 | BIF | N. D. | 94.5 | 6.2 |
| OXY | N. D. | 92.6 | 3.0 | |
| NIT | N. D. | 89.6 | 7.7 | |
| 10 | BIF | N. D. | 92.5 | 3.9 |
| OXY | N. D. | 90.6 | 4.5 | |
| NIT | N. D. | 91.3 | 11.3 |
Fig. 7 Chromatograms of (a) Des standard solution, spiked rice samples (20 μg/kg) (b) direct injection and (c) pretreatment with the proposed MSPE method
| Pretreatment method | Instrument | Sample | Extraction time/min | LOD/(μg/kg) | Recovery/% | Reference | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QuEChERS | LC-MS/MS | spinach | 1 | -4 | 76- | 114 | [19] | |
| DSPE | GC-MS | soil | 10 | 3.5 | -10.5 | 76- | 111 | [20] |
| ASE-DLLE | GC-MS | soil | 14 | 1.2 | -2.6 | 83.5- | 103.3 | [20] |
| SPE | GC-MS | rice | 25 | 70- | 107 | [21] | ||
| MSPE | HPLC-UV | wheat flour | 25 | 0.24 | -0.68 | 88.8- | 96.6 | [22] |
| MSPE | HPLC-UV | rice | 6 | 0.4 | -0.6 | 87.3- | 96.7 | this method |
Table 4 Comparison of the present method with the national standard method and reported methods for the determination of Des
| Pretreatment method | Instrument | Sample | Extraction time/min | LOD/(μg/kg) | Recovery/% | Reference | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QuEChERS | LC-MS/MS | spinach | 1 | -4 | 76- | 114 | [19] | |
| DSPE | GC-MS | soil | 10 | 3.5 | -10.5 | 76- | 111 | [20] |
| ASE-DLLE | GC-MS | soil | 14 | 1.2 | -2.6 | 83.5- | 103.3 | [20] |
| SPE | GC-MS | rice | 25 | 70- | 107 | [21] | ||
| MSPE | HPLC-UV | wheat flour | 25 | 0.24 | -0.68 | 88.8- | 96.6 | [22] |
| MSPE | HPLC-UV | rice | 6 | 0.4 | -0.6 | 87.3- | 96.7 | this method |
|
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||