Chinese Journal of Chromatography ›› 2023, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (6): 482-489.DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1123.2022.12006
• Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
WANG Yuanyuan, LI Lulu, LÜ Jia, CHEN Yongyan, ZHANG Lan()
Received:
2022-12-03
Online:
2023-06-08
Published:
2023-06-01
Supported by:
CLC Number:
WANG Yuanyuan, LI Lulu, LÜ Jia, CHEN Yongyan, ZHANG Lan. Determination of 13 halobenzoquinone disinfection by-products in drinking water using solid phase extraction-ultra performance liquid chromatography-triple quadrupole mass spectrometry[J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2023, 41(6): 482-489.
Compound | Ion pair (m/z) | Retention time/min | DP/V | CE/eV | EP/V | CXP/V | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2,5-Dichloro-1,4-benzoquinone (2,5-DCBQ) | 177.0> | 35.0 | 5.19±0.01 | -70 | -40 | -10 | -6 |
177.0> | 113.1* | -70 | -40 | -10 | -6 | ||
2,6-Dichloro-1,4-benzoquinone (2,6-DCBQ) | 177.0> | 35.0 | 5.35±0.01 | -70 | -40 | -10 | -6 |
177.0> | 113.1* | -70 | -40 | -10 | -6 | ||
2,5-Dibromo-1,4-benzoquinone (2,5-DBBQ) | 266.9> | 79.0 | 6.20±0.01 | -60 | -50 | -10 | -10 |
266.9> | 81.0* | -60 | -50 | -10 | -10 | ||
2,6-Dibromo-1,4-benzoquinone (2,6-DBBQ) | 266.9> | 79.0 | 6.52±0.02 | -60 | -50 | -10 | -10 |
266.9> | 81.0* | -60 | -50 | -10 | -10 | ||
2,6-Dichloro-3-methyl-1,4-benzoquinone (DCMBQ) | 190.0> | 35.0 | 7.73±0.01 | -90 | -43 | -10 | -6 |
191.0> | 126.9* | -90 | -24 | -10 | -6 | ||
2,3,6-Trichloro-1,4-benzoquinone (TriCBQ) | 210.9> | 35.0 | 7.90±0.01 | -100 | -50 | -10 | -10 |
210.9> | 175.0* | -70 | -20 | -10 | -10 | ||
2,6-Diiodo-1,4-benzoquinone (2,6-DIBQ) | 360.0> | 127.0* | 8.19±0.01 | -70 | -33 | -10 | -10 |
361.0> | 127.0 | -70 | -45 | -10 | -10 | ||
2,3,5,6-Tetrachloro-1,4-benzoquinone (TCBQ) | 245.0> | 208.9* | 9.98±0.01 | -50 | -20 | -10 | -10 |
247.0> | 210.9 | -70 | -25 | -10 | -10 | ||
2,6-Dibromo-3,5-dimethyl-1,4-benzoquinone (2,6-DBDMBQ) | 293.9> | 78.9 | 10.00±0.01 | -60 | -50 | -10 | -10 |
293.9> | 80.9* | -60 | -50 | -10 | -10 | ||
2,3-Dibromo-5,6-dimethyl-1,4-benzoquinone (2,3-DBDMBQ) | 293.9> | 78.9 | 10.22±0.01 | -60 | -50 | -10 | -10 |
293.9> | 80.9* | -60 | -50 | -10 | -10 | ||
2,3,5,6-Tetrabromo-1,4-benzoquinone (TBBQ) | 424.7> | 79.0 | 10.54±0.02 | -70 | -74 | -10 | -10 |
424.7> | 81.0* | -74 | -74 | -10 | -10 | ||
3,4,5,6-Tetrachloro-1,2-benzoquinone (TC-1,2-BQ) | 245.0> | 35.0* | 11.45±0.01 | -50 | -50 | -10 | -6 |
247.0> | 35.0 | -50 | -50 | -10 | -6 | ||
3,4,5,6-Tetrabromo-1,2-benzoquinone (TB-1,2-BQ) | 424.7> | 79.0 | 11.63±0.01 | -70 | -74 | -10 | -10 |
424.7> | 81.0* | -70 | -74 | -10 | -10 |
Table 1 MS parameters and retention times of the 13 halobenzoquinones (HBQs)
Compound | Ion pair (m/z) | Retention time/min | DP/V | CE/eV | EP/V | CXP/V | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2,5-Dichloro-1,4-benzoquinone (2,5-DCBQ) | 177.0> | 35.0 | 5.19±0.01 | -70 | -40 | -10 | -6 |
177.0> | 113.1* | -70 | -40 | -10 | -6 | ||
2,6-Dichloro-1,4-benzoquinone (2,6-DCBQ) | 177.0> | 35.0 | 5.35±0.01 | -70 | -40 | -10 | -6 |
177.0> | 113.1* | -70 | -40 | -10 | -6 | ||
2,5-Dibromo-1,4-benzoquinone (2,5-DBBQ) | 266.9> | 79.0 | 6.20±0.01 | -60 | -50 | -10 | -10 |
266.9> | 81.0* | -60 | -50 | -10 | -10 | ||
2,6-Dibromo-1,4-benzoquinone (2,6-DBBQ) | 266.9> | 79.0 | 6.52±0.02 | -60 | -50 | -10 | -10 |
266.9> | 81.0* | -60 | -50 | -10 | -10 | ||
2,6-Dichloro-3-methyl-1,4-benzoquinone (DCMBQ) | 190.0> | 35.0 | 7.73±0.01 | -90 | -43 | -10 | -6 |
191.0> | 126.9* | -90 | -24 | -10 | -6 | ||
2,3,6-Trichloro-1,4-benzoquinone (TriCBQ) | 210.9> | 35.0 | 7.90±0.01 | -100 | -50 | -10 | -10 |
210.9> | 175.0* | -70 | -20 | -10 | -10 | ||
2,6-Diiodo-1,4-benzoquinone (2,6-DIBQ) | 360.0> | 127.0* | 8.19±0.01 | -70 | -33 | -10 | -10 |
361.0> | 127.0 | -70 | -45 | -10 | -10 | ||
2,3,5,6-Tetrachloro-1,4-benzoquinone (TCBQ) | 245.0> | 208.9* | 9.98±0.01 | -50 | -20 | -10 | -10 |
247.0> | 210.9 | -70 | -25 | -10 | -10 | ||
2,6-Dibromo-3,5-dimethyl-1,4-benzoquinone (2,6-DBDMBQ) | 293.9> | 78.9 | 10.00±0.01 | -60 | -50 | -10 | -10 |
293.9> | 80.9* | -60 | -50 | -10 | -10 | ||
2,3-Dibromo-5,6-dimethyl-1,4-benzoquinone (2,3-DBDMBQ) | 293.9> | 78.9 | 10.22±0.01 | -60 | -50 | -10 | -10 |
293.9> | 80.9* | -60 | -50 | -10 | -10 | ||
2,3,5,6-Tetrabromo-1,4-benzoquinone (TBBQ) | 424.7> | 79.0 | 10.54±0.02 | -70 | -74 | -10 | -10 |
424.7> | 81.0* | -74 | -74 | -10 | -10 | ||
3,4,5,6-Tetrachloro-1,2-benzoquinone (TC-1,2-BQ) | 245.0> | 35.0* | 11.45±0.01 | -50 | -50 | -10 | -6 |
247.0> | 35.0 | -50 | -50 | -10 | -6 | ||
3,4,5,6-Tetrabromo-1,2-benzoquinone (TB-1,2-BQ) | 424.7> | 79.0 | 11.63±0.01 | -70 | -74 | -10 | -10 |
424.7> | 81.0* | -70 | -74 | -10 | -10 |
Fig. 1 Chromatogram of the 13 HBQs under optimum conditions The mass concentrations of 2,3-DBDMBQ and other HBQs are 200 μg/L and 50 μg/L, respectively.
Compound | Regression equation | r | Linear range/(μg/L) | MDL/(ng/L) | MQL/(ng/L) | Matrix effect |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2,5-DCBQ | y=10138.9x+290.4 | 0.9996 | 0.5-100 | 0.5 | 1.7 | 0.70 |
2,6-DCBQ | y=23525.5x+1329.0 | 0.9993 | 0.5-100 | 0.3 | 0.9 | 0.61 |
2,5-DBBQ | y=26040.3x+1300.8 | 0.9998 | 0.5-100 | 0.8 | 2.5 | 0.58 |
2,6-DBBQ | y=30750.0x+1239.7 | 0.9998 | 0.5-100 | 0.5 | 1.7 | 0.51 |
DCMBQ | y=23013.0x-6502.2 | 0.9998 | 0.5-100 | 0.4 | 1.3 | 0.45 |
TriCBQ | y=8180.2x-2731.1 | 0.9994 | 1-100 | 1.5 | 4.6 | 0.40 |
2,6-DIBQ | y=75438.0x-15579.0 | 0.9996 | 0.5-100 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 0.39 |
TCBQ | y=12908.8x-6189.7 | 0.9999 | 2-100 | 1.7 | 5.7 | 0.22 |
2,6-DBDMBQ | y=9823.4x-1200.2 | 0.9997 | 2-100 | 1.5 | 5.0 | 0.24 |
2,3-DBDMBQ | y=620.21x-1062.8 | 0.9992 | 10-200 | 10.0 | 33.0 | 0.33 |
TBBQ | y=15687.3x-7489.5 | 0.9993 | 2-100 | 1.7 | 5.7 | 0.20 |
TC-1,2-BQ | y=75973.2x-40836 | 0.9998 | 0.5-100 | 0.3 | 0.9 | 0.42 |
TB-1,2-BQ | y=34732.9x-28283 | 0.9990 | 1-100 | 0.8 | 2.6 | 0.28 |
Table 2 Linear relationships, method detection limits (MDLs), method quantification limits (MQLs) and matrix effects of the 13 HBQs in drinking water
Compound | Regression equation | r | Linear range/(μg/L) | MDL/(ng/L) | MQL/(ng/L) | Matrix effect |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2,5-DCBQ | y=10138.9x+290.4 | 0.9996 | 0.5-100 | 0.5 | 1.7 | 0.70 |
2,6-DCBQ | y=23525.5x+1329.0 | 0.9993 | 0.5-100 | 0.3 | 0.9 | 0.61 |
2,5-DBBQ | y=26040.3x+1300.8 | 0.9998 | 0.5-100 | 0.8 | 2.5 | 0.58 |
2,6-DBBQ | y=30750.0x+1239.7 | 0.9998 | 0.5-100 | 0.5 | 1.7 | 0.51 |
DCMBQ | y=23013.0x-6502.2 | 0.9998 | 0.5-100 | 0.4 | 1.3 | 0.45 |
TriCBQ | y=8180.2x-2731.1 | 0.9994 | 1-100 | 1.5 | 4.6 | 0.40 |
2,6-DIBQ | y=75438.0x-15579.0 | 0.9996 | 0.5-100 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 0.39 |
TCBQ | y=12908.8x-6189.7 | 0.9999 | 2-100 | 1.7 | 5.7 | 0.22 |
2,6-DBDMBQ | y=9823.4x-1200.2 | 0.9997 | 2-100 | 1.5 | 5.0 | 0.24 |
2,3-DBDMBQ | y=620.21x-1062.8 | 0.9992 | 10-200 | 10.0 | 33.0 | 0.33 |
TBBQ | y=15687.3x-7489.5 | 0.9993 | 2-100 | 1.7 | 5.7 | 0.20 |
TC-1,2-BQ | y=75973.2x-40836 | 0.9998 | 0.5-100 | 0.3 | 0.9 | 0.42 |
TB-1,2-BQ | y=34732.9x-28283 | 0.9990 | 1-100 | 0.8 | 2.6 | 0.28 |
Compound | 10 ng/L | 20 ng/L | 50 ng/L | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recovery/% | RSD/% | Recovery/% | RSD/% | Recovery/% | RSD/% | |||
2,5-DCBQ | 77 | 4.8 | 75 | 3.7 | 73 | 7.1 | ||
2,6-DCBQ | 85 | 3.0 | 87 | 4.8 | 81 | 3.6 | ||
2,5-DBBQ | 85 | 4.8 | 83 | 2.7 | 80 | 1.9 | ||
2,6-DBBQ | 87 | 4.2 | 82 | 4.0 | 85 | 2.6 | ||
DCMBQ | 86 | 3.5 | 87 | 3.9 | 81 | 4.9 | ||
TriCBQ | 83 | 2.8 | 84 | 3.4 | 78 | 5.7 | ||
2,6-DIBQ | 78 | 7.0 | 81 | 5.4 | 77 | 3.7 | ||
TCBQ | 80 | 3.7 | 84 | 3.0 | 79 | 2.6 | ||
2,6-DBDMBQ | 85 | 3.3 | 88 | 2.3 | 84 | 4.4 | ||
2,3-DBDMBQ | 84 | 1.9 | 85 | 3.7 | 85 | 1.9 | ||
TBBQ | 82 | 3.3 | 77 | 6.2 | 75 | 4.6 | ||
TC-1,2-BQ | 83 | 5.4 | 78 | 6.3 | 76 | 8.3 | ||
TB-1,2-BQ | 66 | 6.6 | 61 | 7.4 | 56 | 9.2 |
Table 3 Recoveries and RSDs of the 13 HBQs at different spiked levels (n=6)
Compound | 10 ng/L | 20 ng/L | 50 ng/L | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recovery/% | RSD/% | Recovery/% | RSD/% | Recovery/% | RSD/% | |||
2,5-DCBQ | 77 | 4.8 | 75 | 3.7 | 73 | 7.1 | ||
2,6-DCBQ | 85 | 3.0 | 87 | 4.8 | 81 | 3.6 | ||
2,5-DBBQ | 85 | 4.8 | 83 | 2.7 | 80 | 1.9 | ||
2,6-DBBQ | 87 | 4.2 | 82 | 4.0 | 85 | 2.6 | ||
DCMBQ | 86 | 3.5 | 87 | 3.9 | 81 | 4.9 | ||
TriCBQ | 83 | 2.8 | 84 | 3.4 | 78 | 5.7 | ||
2,6-DIBQ | 78 | 7.0 | 81 | 5.4 | 77 | 3.7 | ||
TCBQ | 80 | 3.7 | 84 | 3.0 | 79 | 2.6 | ||
2,6-DBDMBQ | 85 | 3.3 | 88 | 2.3 | 84 | 4.4 | ||
2,3-DBDMBQ | 84 | 1.9 | 85 | 3.7 | 85 | 1.9 | ||
TBBQ | 82 | 3.3 | 77 | 6.2 | 75 | 4.6 | ||
TC-1,2-BQ | 83 | 5.4 | 78 | 6.3 | 76 | 8.3 | ||
TB-1,2-BQ | 66 | 6.6 | 61 | 7.4 | 56 | 9.2 |
Numbers of target compounds | Detection methods | Instrumental analysis time/min | MQL/(ng/L) | Ref. | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Chloro- benzoquinones | Bromo- benzoquinones | Iodo- benzoquinone | Total | |||||
6 | 6 | 1 | 13 | SPE-UPLC-MS/MS | 16 | 0.6 | -33 | this study |
5 | 5 | 0 | 10 | Online SPE-LC-MS/MS | / | 0.2 | -166 | [ |
1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | LLE-GC-ECD | >12 | 2.4 | -2.7 | [ |
1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | SPE-HPLC-MS/MS | 40 | 30 | [ | |
4 | 5 | 0 | 9 | LLE-MicroLC-QTOF MS | 20 | 1.9 | -52.23 | [ |
Table 4 Comparison of the proposed method with other methods
Numbers of target compounds | Detection methods | Instrumental analysis time/min | MQL/(ng/L) | Ref. | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Chloro- benzoquinones | Bromo- benzoquinones | Iodo- benzoquinone | Total | |||||
6 | 6 | 1 | 13 | SPE-UPLC-MS/MS | 16 | 0.6 | -33 | this study |
5 | 5 | 0 | 10 | Online SPE-LC-MS/MS | / | 0.2 | -166 | [ |
1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | LLE-GC-ECD | >12 | 2.4 | -2.7 | [ |
1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | SPE-HPLC-MS/MS | 40 | 30 | [ | |
4 | 5 | 0 | 9 | LLE-MicroLC-QTOF MS | 20 | 1.9 | -52.23 | [ |
|
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||