Chinese Journal of Chromatography ›› 2026, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (1): 92-100.DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1123.2025.04029
• Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
CHENG Yun, LIN Yule, TIAN Miaomiao*(
)
Received:2025-04-25
Online:2026-01-08
Published:2026-01-14
CLC Number:
CHENG Yun, LIN Yule, TIAN Miaomiao. Controlled synthesis of high-capacity bisphenol A molecularly imprinted polymer and its application to the detection of environmental water samples[J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2026, 44(1): 92-100.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.chrom-china.com/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1123.2025.04029
Fig. 1 Preparation process of CoNi-MOF-MIPs2-MeIM: 2-methylimidazole; CoNi-MOF-MIPs: cobalt-nickel metal organic framework molecularly imprinted polymers; BPA: bisphenol A; DA: dopamine hydrochloride.
Fig. 2 Effect of (a) DA amount, (b) polymerization time and (c) adsorption pH on the adsorption performance of CoNi-MOF-MIPs/CoNi-MOF-NIPs for BPA (n=3) IF: imprinting factor.
Fig. 5 (a) Adsorption kinetics diagram, (b) isothermal adsorption, (c) pseudo-second-order kinetic fitting curve, and (d) thermodynamic Langmuir model fitting curve (n=3)
Fig. 6 Evaluation of (a) selective and (b) competitive adsorption performance of CoNi-MOF-MIPS and CoNi-MOF-NIPs for BPA and two competitive substances (n=3)
| Sample | Spiked/(µg/mL) | Detected/(µg/mL) | Recovery/% | RSD/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lake water | 10 | 9.17 | 91.7 | 0.6 |
| 20 | 17.95 | 89.7 | 0.8 | |
| 30 | 26.45 | 88.2 | 1.3 | |
| River water | 10 | 8.03 | 80.3 | 0.8 |
| 20 | 16.47 | 82.3 | 0.9 | |
| 30 | 24.82 | 82.7 | 1.7 |
Table 1 Recoveries of BPA in environmental water samples at three levels (n=3)
| Sample | Spiked/(µg/mL) | Detected/(µg/mL) | Recovery/% | RSD/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lake water | 10 | 9.17 | 91.7 | 0.6 |
| 20 | 17.95 | 89.7 | 0.8 | |
| 30 | 26.45 | 88.2 | 1.3 | |
| River water | 10 | 8.03 | 80.3 | 0.8 |
| 20 | 16.47 | 82.3 | 0.9 | |
| 30 | 24.82 | 82.7 | 1.7 |
Fig. 8 Chromatograms of (a) BPA standard solution, spiked lake water sample (10 μg/mL) (b) before enrichment and (c) after enrichment with CoNi-MOF-MIPs
| Adsorbents | Q/(mg/g) | IF | LOD | LOQ | RSD/% | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rFe3O4@ZIF-8@MIPa | 10.10 | 2.72 | 0.1 µg/L | — | 3.6 | [ |
| VTTS-MGO@mSiO2@MIPsb | 16.81 | 4.18 | 0.010 µg/L | 2.68 µg/L | 5.01-5.73 | [ |
| DES-MIPc | 17.72 | 2.02 | — | — | — | [ |
| S-MIPsd | 36.00 | 1.76 | 0.0017 mg/L | — | — | [ |
| E-TBBPA-MIMe | — | 6.31 | — | — | — | [ |
| CoNi-MOF-MIPs | 39.29 | 3.48 | 0.05 µg/mL | 0.17 µg/mL | 0.60-1.7 | this work |
Table 2 Comparison of analytical performance to BPA with different adsorbents
| Adsorbents | Q/(mg/g) | IF | LOD | LOQ | RSD/% | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rFe3O4@ZIF-8@MIPa | 10.10 | 2.72 | 0.1 µg/L | — | 3.6 | [ |
| VTTS-MGO@mSiO2@MIPsb | 16.81 | 4.18 | 0.010 µg/L | 2.68 µg/L | 5.01-5.73 | [ |
| DES-MIPc | 17.72 | 2.02 | — | — | — | [ |
| S-MIPsd | 36.00 | 1.76 | 0.0017 mg/L | — | — | [ |
| E-TBBPA-MIMe | — | 6.31 | — | — | — | [ |
| CoNi-MOF-MIPs | 39.29 | 3.48 | 0.05 µg/mL | 0.17 µg/mL | 0.60-1.7 | this work |
|
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||