Chinese Journal of Chromatography ›› 2026, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (10): 1223-1232.DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1123.2026.01019
• Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
WANG Xuan, WANG Chunxiao, XIA Yan*(
)
Received:2026-02-10
Online:2026-10-08
Published:2026-10-13
Supported by:CLC Number:
WANG Xuan, WANG Chunxiao, XIA Yan. Trifluoroacetic acid-modulated synthesis of defective UiO-66 for highly efficient removal of sodium p-perfluorous nonenoxybenzenesulfonate[J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2026, 44(10): 1223-1232.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.chrom-china.com/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1123.2026.01019
Fig. 3 (a) FT-IR spectra of the UiO-66 series materials; (b) XPS survey spectra of U-TFA-10 M and UN-TFA-10 M; XRD patterns of (c) UiO-66 and (d) UiO-66-NH₂ synthesized with varying concentrations of TFAU-TFA-5 M/UN-TFA-5 M, U-TFA-7.5 M/UN-TFA-7.5 M, U-TFA-10 M/UN-TFA-10 M, and U-TFA-12.5 M/UN-TFA-12.5 M represent the adsorbents prepared by tuning the TFA concentration to the indicated values (5, 7.5, 10, 12.5 mol/L).
Fig. 4 Effects of (a) modulator type, (b) TFA concentration, (c) pH, and (d) Cl- mass concentration on the adsorption of OBS by the UiO-66 series materialsqe: adsorption capacity at adsorption equilibrium; AA: acetic acid; PA: propionic acid.
Fig. 5 (a) Adsorption isotherms, (b) Langmuir model fitting curves, (c) Freundlich model fitting curves, (d) adsorption kinetics, (e) pseudo-first-order kinetic model fitting curves, and (f) pseudo-second-order kinetic model fitting curves of OBS on U-TFA-10 M and UN-TFA-10 Mqt : adsorption capacity at time t; Ce: mass concentration at adsorption equilibrium.
Fig. 6 (a) Comparison of adsorption performance between pristine and regenerated U-TFA-10 M and UN-TFA-10 M; (b) adsorption performance comparison of regenerated U-TFA-10 M and UN-TFA-10 M with commercial adsorbentsAC: activated carbon; IRA-900: anion exchange resin; Re-U: regenerated U-TFA-10 M; Re-UN: regenerated UN-TFA-10 M.
Fig. 7 U-TFA-10 M and UN-TFA-10 M: (a) XRD patterns before and after OBS adsorption, (b) Zeta potential, and (c) adsorption toward different analytesBA: benzoic acid; 2-FBA: 2-fluorobenzoic acid; SDBS: sodium dodecyl benzene sulfonate.
| Adsorbents | qm,exp/(mg/g) | BET/(m2/g) | t/h | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2-GAC | 382.9 | 1705.0 | 72 | [ |
| Fe3O4/rGO | 241.8 | 95.5 | 120 | [ |
| CTF2/Fe3O4 | 783.8 | 852.4 | 3 | [ |
| UiO-66-F2 | 215.6 | 593.0 | 24 | [ |
| UiO-66-F4 | 451.2 | 814.0 | 24 | [ |
| U-TFA-10 M | 668.5 | 1819.0 | 0.5 | this work |
| UN-TFA-10 M | 592.7 | 1450.0 | 0.5 | this work |
Table 1 Comparison of OBS adsorption performance between the adsorbents developed in this work and other reported adsorbents
| Adsorbents | qm,exp/(mg/g) | BET/(m2/g) | t/h | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2-GAC | 382.9 | 1705.0 | 72 | [ |
| Fe3O4/rGO | 241.8 | 95.5 | 120 | [ |
| CTF2/Fe3O4 | 783.8 | 852.4 | 3 | [ |
| UiO-66-F2 | 215.6 | 593.0 | 24 | [ |
| UiO-66-F4 | 451.2 | 814.0 | 24 | [ |
| U-TFA-10 M | 668.5 | 1819.0 | 0.5 | this work |
| UN-TFA-10 M | 592.7 | 1450.0 | 0.5 | this work |
|
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||