Chinese Journal of Chromatography ›› 2023, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (6): 504-512.DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1123.2022.09006
• Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
CHEN Jinnan1, WANG Meng1,2, DONG Zemin3, YE Jin1,*(), LI Li1, WU Yu1, LIU Hongmei1, WANG Songxue1
Received:
2022-09-08
Online:
2023-06-08
Published:
2023-06-01
Supported by:
CLC Number:
CHEN Jinnan, WANG Meng, DONG Zemin, YE Jin, LI Li, WU Yu, LIU Hongmei, WANG Songxue. Determination of four aflatoxins in feeds by high throughput automated immunoaffinity magnetic beads purification-ultra performance liquid chromatography[J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2023, 41(6): 504-512.
Fig. 2 (a) Recoveries (n=3) and maximum adsorption capacities of AFTs of MB coupled with different amounts of antibodies, (b) VSM diagrams at room temperature of MB and IMB and (c) microscope diagram of IMB AFB1: aflatoxin B1; AFB2: aflatoxin B2; AFG1: aflatoxin G1; AFG2: aflatoxin G2; MB: magnetic bead; VSM: vibrating sample magnetometer. Agarose-modified microsphere and MB core are located inside the red and blue circles, respectively.
Fig. 6 (a) Effect of different dilution solutions on the recoveries of AFTs (n=3) and (b) UPLC chromatograms of different feed samples purified by IMB DDGS: distillers dried grains with solubles.
Substrate | Spiked level/ (μg/kg) | AFB1 | AFB2 | AFG1 | AFG2 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recovery/% | RSD/% | Recovery/% | RSD/% | Recovery/% | RSD/% | Recovery/% | RSD/% | ||||||
Soybean | 5 | 99.7 | 4.8 | 108.8 | 2.4 | 100.1 | 6.6 | 104.7 | 3.2 | ||||
meal | 20 | 98.3 | 1.2 | 109.9 | 1.4 | 98.4 | 0.5 | 104.8 | 2.0 | ||||
40 | 95.4 | 1.4 | 107.0 | 0.9 | 95.2 | 1.7 | 99.8 | 1.3 | |||||
DDGS | 5 | 119.4 | 5.4 | 113.2 | 1.5 | 94.7 | 1.4 | 103.7 | 0.8 | ||||
20 | 99.1 | 0.7 | 105.5 | 0.4 | 92.8 | 1.6 | 100.6 | 0.5 | |||||
40 | 94.7 | 0.6 | 103.1 | 1.4 | 92.2 | 2.4 | 97.6 | 1.4 | |||||
Pig feed | 5 | 116.0 | 3.9 | 116.8 | 2.0 | 112.3 | 1.9 | 107.2 | 4.9 | ||||
20 | 112.3 | 1.4 | 114.0 | 1.8 | 105.8 | 2.2 | 112.9 | 1.9 | |||||
40 | 110.7 | 3.3 | 113.8 | 2.7 | 110.2 | 2.0 | 113.8 | 1.6 | |||||
Chicken | 5 | 91.9 | 6.9 | 112.5 | 1.9 | 93.2 | 2.0 | 105.9 | 1.7 | ||||
feed | 20 | 97.9 | 3.1 | 114.8 | 1.1 | 94.8 | 1.0 | 105.6 | 1.5 | ||||
40 | 92.1 | 0.8 | 110.2 | 1.0 | 91.1 | 2.1 | 99.3 | 0.2 |
Table 1 Recoveries and RSDs of AFTs in different feed samples (n=3)
Substrate | Spiked level/ (μg/kg) | AFB1 | AFB2 | AFG1 | AFG2 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recovery/% | RSD/% | Recovery/% | RSD/% | Recovery/% | RSD/% | Recovery/% | RSD/% | ||||||
Soybean | 5 | 99.7 | 4.8 | 108.8 | 2.4 | 100.1 | 6.6 | 104.7 | 3.2 | ||||
meal | 20 | 98.3 | 1.2 | 109.9 | 1.4 | 98.4 | 0.5 | 104.8 | 2.0 | ||||
40 | 95.4 | 1.4 | 107.0 | 0.9 | 95.2 | 1.7 | 99.8 | 1.3 | |||||
DDGS | 5 | 119.4 | 5.4 | 113.2 | 1.5 | 94.7 | 1.4 | 103.7 | 0.8 | ||||
20 | 99.1 | 0.7 | 105.5 | 0.4 | 92.8 | 1.6 | 100.6 | 0.5 | |||||
40 | 94.7 | 0.6 | 103.1 | 1.4 | 92.2 | 2.4 | 97.6 | 1.4 | |||||
Pig feed | 5 | 116.0 | 3.9 | 116.8 | 2.0 | 112.3 | 1.9 | 107.2 | 4.9 | ||||
20 | 112.3 | 1.4 | 114.0 | 1.8 | 105.8 | 2.2 | 112.9 | 1.9 | |||||
40 | 110.7 | 3.3 | 113.8 | 2.7 | 110.2 | 2.0 | 113.8 | 1.6 | |||||
Chicken | 5 | 91.9 | 6.9 | 112.5 | 1.9 | 93.2 | 2.0 | 105.9 | 1.7 | ||||
feed | 20 | 97.9 | 3.1 | 114.8 | 1.1 | 94.8 | 1.0 | 105.6 | 1.5 | ||||
40 | 92.1 | 0.8 | 110.2 | 1.0 | 91.1 | 2.1 | 99.3 | 0.2 |
No. | Feed | AFB1/(μg/kg) | No. | Feed | AFB1/(μg/kg) | No. | Feed | AFB1/(μg/kg) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
This method | Ref. [ | This method | Ref. [ | This method | Ref. [ | |||||||
1 | chicken feed | 18.0 | 20.6 | 8 | sheep feed | <LOD | <LOD | 15 | cattle feed | <LOD | <LOD | |
2 | chicken feed | 38.6 | 41.9 | 9 | cattle feed | <LOD | <LOD | 16 | cattle feed | 5.1 | 6.2 | |
3 | chicken feed | <LOD | <LOD | 10 | cattle feed | <LOD | <LOD | 17 | cattle feed | <LOD | <LOD | |
4 | sheep feed | <LOD | <LOD | 11 | cattle feed | <LOD | <LOD | 18 | cattle feed | <LOD | <LOD | |
5 | sheep feed | 7.3 | 9.5 | 12 | cattle feed | <LOD | <LOD | 19 | pig feed | <LOD | <LOD | |
6 | sheep feed | <LOD | <LOD | 13 | cattle feed | <LOD | <LOD | 20 | soybean meal | <LOD | <LOD | |
7 | sheep feed | <LOD | <LOD | 14 | cattle feed | <LOD | <LOD | 21 | DDGS | <LOD | <LOD |
Table 2 Determination results of 21 feed samples by two methods
No. | Feed | AFB1/(μg/kg) | No. | Feed | AFB1/(μg/kg) | No. | Feed | AFB1/(μg/kg) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
This method | Ref. [ | This method | Ref. [ | This method | Ref. [ | |||||||
1 | chicken feed | 18.0 | 20.6 | 8 | sheep feed | <LOD | <LOD | 15 | cattle feed | <LOD | <LOD | |
2 | chicken feed | 38.6 | 41.9 | 9 | cattle feed | <LOD | <LOD | 16 | cattle feed | 5.1 | 6.2 | |
3 | chicken feed | <LOD | <LOD | 10 | cattle feed | <LOD | <LOD | 17 | cattle feed | <LOD | <LOD | |
4 | sheep feed | <LOD | <LOD | 11 | cattle feed | <LOD | <LOD | 18 | cattle feed | <LOD | <LOD | |
5 | sheep feed | 7.3 | 9.5 | 12 | cattle feed | <LOD | <LOD | 19 | pig feed | <LOD | <LOD | |
6 | sheep feed | <LOD | <LOD | 13 | cattle feed | <LOD | <LOD | 20 | soybean meal | <LOD | <LOD | |
7 | sheep feed | <LOD | <LOD | 14 | cattle feed | <LOD | <LOD | 21 | DDGS | <LOD | <LOD |
|
[1] | PENG Maomin, YU Xiaobing, CHEN Lin, XIONG Qingsong, LIU Li, ZHENG Dan, XIA Hong, YU Qiongwei, PENG Xitian. Modified QuEChERS method combined with ultra performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry for detection of cyclopiazonic acid in feeds [J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2024, 42(5): 445-451. |
[2] | SHI Yuhao, NAN Yi, ZHENG Wei, YAO Lan, LIANG Haizhen, CHEN Xiaojuan, SONG Juan, ZHANG Jie, JIA Dexian, WANG Qian, MA Baiping. Qualitative and semiquantitative analyses of the chemical components of the seed coat and kernel of Ziziphi Spinosae Semen [J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2024, 42(3): 234-244. |
[3] | MA Chao, NI Hongxing, QI Yulin. Chemical diversity of dissolved organic matter revealed by ultra performance liquid chromatography-Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry [J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2023, 41(8): 662-672. |
[4] | YANG Zhe, LYU Jianxia, WU Yidi, JIANG Liwei, LI Dongmei. Simultaneous determination of five indole/indazole amide-based synthetic cannabinoids in electronic cigarette oil by ultra performance liquid chromatography [J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2023, 41(7): 602-609. |
[5] | LI Yangjie, HUANG Jiaying, FANG Jihui, HUANG Zhiye. Fast screening and confirmation of 73 common prohibited compounds in cosmetics by ultra performance liquid chromatography-quadrupole-time-of-flight high resolution mass spectrometry [J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2022, 40(5): 433-442. |
[6] | CHENG Qian, JIA Daihui, ZHANG Bohui, XU Junyan, SHAO Zhe, HUANG Yingfeng, ZOU Xun. Analysis of glycan ratio of Chinese hamster ovary cell-cetuximab antigen-binding segment via rapid enzyme digestion with endo-β-N-acetylglucosaminidase F [J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2022, 40(2): 175-181. |
[7] | QU Li, GU Shuqing, ZHANG Jiaqi, ZHAO Chaomin, DENG Xiaojun. Determination of 18 amino acids in three different kinds of milk powder by ultra performance liquid chromatography coupled with pre-column derivatization [J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2021, 39(5): 472-477. |
[8] | WU Fengqi, YUE Zhenfeng, ZHANG Yi, HUANG Yuanxiang, WEN Jinglan. Progress in analysis methods for major mycotoxins in foodstuffs [J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2020, 38(7): 759-767. |
[9] | WANG Jia, LING Yun, DENG Yamei, ZHANG Yujia, YANG Xusheng, LIU Lixia, LIU Xiaomin, LI Donghui, ZHANG Feng. Determination of 15 lipid regulators in fish meat by QuEChERS-ultra performance liquid chromatography-quadrupole/ electrostatic field orbitrap mass spectrometry [J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2020, 38(6): 655-662. |
[10] | DAI Chaozheng, XU Xiaoping. Unified form of liquid chromatography plate height equation [J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2020, 38(5): 581-586. |
[11] | ZHANG Chenxia, MA Yuxiang, ZHAO Tianpei, XI Jun, LI Pan, GUO Qing, SHI Lili, WANG Xuede. Determination of seven heterocyclic aromatic amines in oils and fried foods by ultra performance liquid chromatography-triple quadrupole mass spectrometry [J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2020, 38(2): 224-231. |
[12] | PAN Cheng, HU Chaoyang, REN Xiaoying, WU Ling, HUANG Hehe, JIANG Fengling, XIE Yong, QIU Xiuyu. Determination of neohesperidin dihydrochalcone and naringin dihydrochalcone in feeds by solid phase extraction-high performance liquid chromatography [J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2019, 37(6): 649-654. |
[13] | YAN Meng, ZHAO Yang, ZHANG Yangjun, YING Wantao, QIAN Xiaohong. Establishment of a microscale peptide prefractionation system based on ultra performance liquid chromatography and the eight-port rotor valve [J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2019, 37(5): 477-483. |
[14] | LIN Tao, WEI Maoqiong, YU Jidong, LI Maoxuan, ZOU Yanhong, SHA Lingjie, LIU Hongcheng. Determination of nicotine in wild edible fungi by QuEChERS-ultra performance liquid chromatography-triple quadrupole mass spectrometry [J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2019, 37(5): 512-517. |
[15] | ZHOU Peng, HUANG Qian, OUYANG Liqun, WANG Zheng, MENG Peng, DAI Ming, WANG Ying. Determination of fipronil and its metabolites in feeds by stable isotope dilution ultra high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry [J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2018, 36(7): 629-633. |
Viewed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Full text 115
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract 181
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||