Chinese Journal of Chromatography ›› 2022, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (7): 634-643.DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1123.2022.01011
• Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
CHEN Yan, HUANG Congling, JIANG Xunyuan, CHEN Zhiting, WANG Gang, WAN Kai, TANG Xuemei*()
Received:
2022-01-17
Online:
2022-07-08
Published:
2022-07-06
Contact:
TANG Xuemei
Supported by:
CLC Number:
CHEN Yan, HUANG Congling, JIANG Xunyuan, CHEN Zhiting, WANG Gang, WAN Kai, TANG Xuemei. Chiral separation of new chiral insecticide pyraquinil isomers and establishment of analytical methods in vegetables[J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2022, 40(7): 634-643.
Compound | Parent ion (m/z) | Product ion (m/z) | Dwell time/ms | Q1 voltage/V | Collision energy/eV | Q3 voltage/V |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pyr | 543.00 | 349.00* | 30.0 | 24.0 | 39.0 | 23.0 |
363.00 | 30.0 | 24.0 | 36.0 | 24.0 | ||
Pyr+O | 559.00 | 352.90* | 30.0 | 22.0 | 25.0 | 17.0 |
366.90 | 30.0 | 26.0 | 35.0 | 22.0 |
Table 1 Mass spectrometric parameters of Pyr and its metabolites
Compound | Parent ion (m/z) | Product ion (m/z) | Dwell time/ms | Q1 voltage/V | Collision energy/eV | Q3 voltage/V |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pyr | 543.00 | 349.00* | 30.0 | 24.0 | 39.0 | 23.0 |
363.00 | 30.0 | 24.0 | 36.0 | 24.0 | ||
Pyr+O | 559.00 | 352.90* | 30.0 | 22.0 | 25.0 | 17.0 |
366.90 | 30.0 | 26.0 | 35.0 | 22.0 |
Elution condition number | φ(Mobile phase B)/% | Acquisition time/min | Rs1 | Rs2 | Rs3 | Rs4 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 20-95-95-20 | 5-35-40-45 | 0.53 | 1.37 | 0.96 | 2.93 |
2 | 40-95-95-40-40 | 5-50-65-70-80 | 1.03 | 2.05 | 1.31 | 3.88 |
3 | 40-70-95-95-40-40 | 5-35-40-45-48-50 | 1.12 | 2.10 | 1.34 | 3.97 |
4 | 42-55-95-95-42-42 | 4-55-58-62-65-70 | 1.62 | 2.64 | 1.62 | 5.47 |
5 | 42-48-42-42 | 2.5-66-67-70 | 1.63 | 2.81 | 1.78 | 6.03 |
6 | 43-46-43-43 | 2.5-57-58-60 | 1.63 | 2.83 | 1.74 | 5.82 |
Table 2 Resolutions (Rs) of Pyr and Pyr+O enantiomers under different elution conditions
Elution condition number | φ(Mobile phase B)/% | Acquisition time/min | Rs1 | Rs2 | Rs3 | Rs4 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 20-95-95-20 | 5-35-40-45 | 0.53 | 1.37 | 0.96 | 2.93 |
2 | 40-95-95-40-40 | 5-50-65-70-80 | 1.03 | 2.05 | 1.31 | 3.88 |
3 | 40-70-95-95-40-40 | 5-35-40-45-48-50 | 1.12 | 2.10 | 1.34 | 3.97 |
4 | 42-55-95-95-42-42 | 4-55-58-62-65-70 | 1.62 | 2.64 | 1.62 | 5.47 |
5 | 42-48-42-42 | 2.5-66-67-70 | 1.63 | 2.81 | 1.78 | 6.03 |
6 | 43-46-43-43 | 2.5-57-58-60 | 1.63 | 2.83 | 1.74 | 5.82 |
Fig. 3 Chromatogram of the separation of Pyr and its oxidation products under elution condition 6 in Table 2 The Chiral column: Chiral INC (250 mm×4.6 mm, 5 μm); mobile phase A: 2 mmol/L ammonium formate aqueous solution; mobile phase B: acetonitrile; column temperature: 28 ℃; injection volume: 1 μL; flow rate: 0.5 mL/min; elution program: 0-2.5 min, 43%B; 2.5-57 min, 43%B-46%B; 57-58 min, 46%B-43%B; 58-60 min, 43%B. Peak identifications: 1-4. four chiral isomers of pyraquinil; 5, 6. two chiral isomers of oxidation products.
Fig. 4 Peak order of stereoisomers of Pyr and Pyr+O on Chiral INC column a-e represent the chromatogram of the Pyr and Pyr+O, RS-Pyr and S-(Pyr+O), SS-Pyr and S-(Pyr+O), RR-Pyr and R-(Pyr+O), and SR-Pyr and R-(Pyr+O), respectively.
Fig. 5 Recoveries of Pyr and Pyr+O enantiomers in (a) water spinach (Ipomoea aquatica Forsk) and (b) pakchoi (Brassica rapa ssp. chinensis L.) (n=3) Combinations of purifiers: A. 0.85 g MgSO4+0.150 g PSA; B. 0.985 g MgSO4+0.015 g GCB; C. 0.835 g MgSO4+0.150 g PSA+0.015 g GCB.
Analyte | Matrix | Linear range/(μg/L) | Standard curve | R2 | Matrix effect/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
RS-Pyr | acetonitrile | 0.25-500 | Y=8.7×107X-1.6×104 | 0.9999 | |
water spinach | 1.25-1250 | Y=1.1×108X+4.3×105 | 0.9998 | 26.8 | |
pakchoi | 1.25-1250 | Y=9.3×107X+1.3×105 | 0.9999 | 6.1 | |
SS-Pyr | acetonitrile | 0.25-500 | Y=1.1×108X-2.6×103 | 0.9999 | |
water spinach | 1.25-1250 | Y=1.1×108X+5.1×105 | 0.9998 | 1.9 | |
pakchoi | 1.25-1250 | Y=1.2×108X+1.6×106 | 0.9987 | 10.2 | |
RR-Pyr | acetonitrile | 0.25-500 | Y=1.1×108X+3.4×104 | 0.9999 | |
water spinach | 1.25-1250 | Y=1.1×108X+5.0×105 | 0.9998 | 0.7 | |
pakchoi | 1.25-1250 | Y=1.2×108X+1.6×106 | 0.9987 | 9.0 | |
SR-Pyr | acetonitrile | 0.25-500 | Y=9.2×107X+1.4×104 | 0.9999 | |
water spinach | 1.25-1250 | Y=1.1×108X+4.4×105 | 0.9998 | 20.7 | |
pakchoi | 1.25-1250 | Y=1.2×108X+1.4×106 | 0.9988 | 30.6 | |
S-(Pyr+O) | acetonitrile | 0.5-100 | Y=6.5×107X+2.1×104 | 0.9999 | |
water spinach | 2.5-2500 | Y=6.9×107X+8.3×105 | 0.9996 | 7.3 | |
pakchoi | 2.5-2500 | Y=7.6×107X+2.2×106 | 0.9981 | 17.1 | |
R-(Pyr+O) | acetonitrile | 0.5-100 | Y=6.6×107X+2.7×104 | 0.9999 | |
water spinach | 2.5-2500 | Y=7.2×107X+6.9×105 | 0.9997 | 9.0 | |
pakchoi | 2.5-2500 | Y=7.8×107X+2.0×106 | 0.9999 | 18.2 |
Table 3 Linear relationships and matrix effects of Pyr and Pyr+O enantiomers
Analyte | Matrix | Linear range/(μg/L) | Standard curve | R2 | Matrix effect/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
RS-Pyr | acetonitrile | 0.25-500 | Y=8.7×107X-1.6×104 | 0.9999 | |
water spinach | 1.25-1250 | Y=1.1×108X+4.3×105 | 0.9998 | 26.8 | |
pakchoi | 1.25-1250 | Y=9.3×107X+1.3×105 | 0.9999 | 6.1 | |
SS-Pyr | acetonitrile | 0.25-500 | Y=1.1×108X-2.6×103 | 0.9999 | |
water spinach | 1.25-1250 | Y=1.1×108X+5.1×105 | 0.9998 | 1.9 | |
pakchoi | 1.25-1250 | Y=1.2×108X+1.6×106 | 0.9987 | 10.2 | |
RR-Pyr | acetonitrile | 0.25-500 | Y=1.1×108X+3.4×104 | 0.9999 | |
water spinach | 1.25-1250 | Y=1.1×108X+5.0×105 | 0.9998 | 0.7 | |
pakchoi | 1.25-1250 | Y=1.2×108X+1.6×106 | 0.9987 | 9.0 | |
SR-Pyr | acetonitrile | 0.25-500 | Y=9.2×107X+1.4×104 | 0.9999 | |
water spinach | 1.25-1250 | Y=1.1×108X+4.4×105 | 0.9998 | 20.7 | |
pakchoi | 1.25-1250 | Y=1.2×108X+1.4×106 | 0.9988 | 30.6 | |
S-(Pyr+O) | acetonitrile | 0.5-100 | Y=6.5×107X+2.1×104 | 0.9999 | |
water spinach | 2.5-2500 | Y=6.9×107X+8.3×105 | 0.9996 | 7.3 | |
pakchoi | 2.5-2500 | Y=7.6×107X+2.2×106 | 0.9981 | 17.1 | |
R-(Pyr+O) | acetonitrile | 0.5-100 | Y=6.6×107X+2.7×104 | 0.9999 | |
water spinach | 2.5-2500 | Y=7.2×107X+6.9×105 | 0.9997 | 9.0 | |
pakchoi | 2.5-2500 | Y=7.8×107X+2.0×106 | 0.9999 | 18.2 |
Analyte | Spiked level/ (μg/kg) | Intra-day (n=3) | Inter-day RSD/% (n=9) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Day 1 | Day 2 | Day 3 | ||||||||
Recovery/% | RSD/% | Recovery/% | RSD/% | Recovery/% | RSD/% | |||||
RS-Pyr | 0.25 | 101.1 | 1.6 | 105.7 | 5.0 | 96.3 | 5.1 | 4.6 | ||
5 | 98.8 | 1.2 | 104.9 | 2.2 | 102.8 | 7.2 | 3.0 | |||
100 | 107.8 | 1.8 | 108.5 | 2.0 | 105.5 | 3.6 | 1.5 | |||
SS-Pyr | 0.25 | 100.0 | 9.4 | 96.5 | 1.9 | 90.2 | 1.4 | 5.2 | ||
5 | 99.9 | 4.5 | 94.5 | 3.0 | 94.2 | 8.0 | 3.3 | |||
100 | 103.6 | 0.7 | 99.5 | 2.0 | 95.3 | 2.7 | 4.2 | |||
RR-Pyr | 0.25 | 104.1 | 6.0 | 105.8 | 8.7 | 101.1 | 3.2 | 2.3 | ||
5 | 98.2 | 4.4 | 95.4 | 3.2 | 97.1 | 7.6 | 1.5 | |||
100 | 109.5 | 1.4 | 97.6 | 1.2 | 98.1 | 1.2 | 6.6 | |||
SR-Pyr | 0.25 | 108.8 | 8.3 | 100.9 | 6.6 | 108.2 | 8.0 | 4.1 | ||
5 | 103.4 | 1.9 | 105.0 | 1.7 | 109.9 | 6.1 | 3.2 | |||
100 | 108.3 | 0.7 | 106.6 | 2.5 | 106.3 | 1.8 | 1.0 | |||
S-(Pyr+O) | 0.5 | 72.6 | 5.2 | 83.3 | 2.0 | 76.4 | 2.7 | 7.0 | ||
10 | 84.3 | 3.2 | 88.1 | 4.5 | 89.2 | 2.9 | 3.0 | |||
200 | 88.1 | 2.4 | 91.2 | 0.6 | 90.6 | 0.8 | 1.8 | |||
R-(Pyr+O) | 0.5 | 91.7 | 8.4 | 83.9 | 3.5 | 77.1 | 2.7 | 8.6 | ||
10 | 84.9 | 4.3 | 80.9 | 3.4 | 83.6 | 2.2 | 2.4 | |||
200 | 88.7 | 2.0 | 83.3 | 0.5 | 92.8 | 1.6 | 5.4 |
Table 4 Spiked recoveries of Pyr and Pyr+O enantiomers in water spinach
Analyte | Spiked level/ (μg/kg) | Intra-day (n=3) | Inter-day RSD/% (n=9) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Day 1 | Day 2 | Day 3 | ||||||||
Recovery/% | RSD/% | Recovery/% | RSD/% | Recovery/% | RSD/% | |||||
RS-Pyr | 0.25 | 101.1 | 1.6 | 105.7 | 5.0 | 96.3 | 5.1 | 4.6 | ||
5 | 98.8 | 1.2 | 104.9 | 2.2 | 102.8 | 7.2 | 3.0 | |||
100 | 107.8 | 1.8 | 108.5 | 2.0 | 105.5 | 3.6 | 1.5 | |||
SS-Pyr | 0.25 | 100.0 | 9.4 | 96.5 | 1.9 | 90.2 | 1.4 | 5.2 | ||
5 | 99.9 | 4.5 | 94.5 | 3.0 | 94.2 | 8.0 | 3.3 | |||
100 | 103.6 | 0.7 | 99.5 | 2.0 | 95.3 | 2.7 | 4.2 | |||
RR-Pyr | 0.25 | 104.1 | 6.0 | 105.8 | 8.7 | 101.1 | 3.2 | 2.3 | ||
5 | 98.2 | 4.4 | 95.4 | 3.2 | 97.1 | 7.6 | 1.5 | |||
100 | 109.5 | 1.4 | 97.6 | 1.2 | 98.1 | 1.2 | 6.6 | |||
SR-Pyr | 0.25 | 108.8 | 8.3 | 100.9 | 6.6 | 108.2 | 8.0 | 4.1 | ||
5 | 103.4 | 1.9 | 105.0 | 1.7 | 109.9 | 6.1 | 3.2 | |||
100 | 108.3 | 0.7 | 106.6 | 2.5 | 106.3 | 1.8 | 1.0 | |||
S-(Pyr+O) | 0.5 | 72.6 | 5.2 | 83.3 | 2.0 | 76.4 | 2.7 | 7.0 | ||
10 | 84.3 | 3.2 | 88.1 | 4.5 | 89.2 | 2.9 | 3.0 | |||
200 | 88.1 | 2.4 | 91.2 | 0.6 | 90.6 | 0.8 | 1.8 | |||
R-(Pyr+O) | 0.5 | 91.7 | 8.4 | 83.9 | 3.5 | 77.1 | 2.7 | 8.6 | ||
10 | 84.9 | 4.3 | 80.9 | 3.4 | 83.6 | 2.2 | 2.4 | |||
200 | 88.7 | 2.0 | 83.3 | 0.5 | 92.8 | 1.6 | 5.4 |
Analyte | Spiked level/ (μg/kg) | Intra-day (n=3) | Inter-day RSD/% (n=9) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Day 1 | Day 2 | Day 3 | ||||||||
Recovery/% | RSD/% | Recovery/% | RSD/% | Recovery/% | RSD/% | |||||
RS-Pyr | 0.25 | 108.1 | 8.3 | 99.4 | 4.7 | 109.8 | 2.1 | 5.3 | ||
5 | 108.8 | 3.3 | 106.4 | 1.1 | 109.6 | 0.9 | 1.5 | |||
100 | 108.6 | 2.8 | 102.5 | 2.0 | 97.3 | 3.9 | 5.5 | |||
SS-Pyr | 0.25 | 106.4 | 5.0 | 103.2 | 7.8 | 98.7 | 2.4 | 3.8 | ||
5 | 101.5 | 3.4 | 106.1 | 0.7 | 99.6 | 2.6 | 3.3 | |||
100 | 103.5 | 2.6 | 98.6 | 1.9 | 93.1 | 7.7 | 5.3 | |||
RR-Pyr | 0.25 | 97.0 | 7.1 | 97.2 | 6.1 | 102.7 | 3.6 | 3.3 | ||
5 | 105.0 | 7.4 | 110.3 | 2.0 | 110.6 | 1.3 | 2.9 | |||
100 | 105.0 | 2.1 | 100.4 | 1.2 | 96.6 | 7.8 | 4.2 | |||
SR-Pyr | 0.25 | 97.1 | 7.7 | 106.8 | 2.2 | 104.7 | 3.1 | 4.9 | ||
5 | 105.8 | 7.1 | 109.6 | 1.4 | 107.1 | 0.6 | 1.8 | |||
100 | 106.9 | 1.9 | 107.0 | 4.5 | 103.6 | 6.2 | 1.8 | |||
S-(Pyr+O) | 0.5 | 94.9 | 4.4 | 82.5 | 7.9 | 85.0 | 3.4 | 7.5 | ||
10 | 88.0 | 5.1 | 86.9 | 2.5 | 88.8 | 1.9 | 1.1 | |||
200 | 88.7 | 0.8 | 81.2 | 1.9 | 87.9 | 5.1 | 4.8 | |||
R-(Pyr+O) | 0.5 | 100.1 | 2.6 | 88.5 | 3.3 | 87.5 | 3.1 | 7.6 | ||
10 | 90.1 | 5.4 | 85.7 | 1.4 | 88.0 | 1.1 | 2.5 | |||
200 | 90.9 | 1.0 | 87.0 | 2.0 | 92.0 | 5.7 | 2.9 |
Table 5 Spiked recoveries of Pyr and Pyr+O enantiomers in pakchoi
Analyte | Spiked level/ (μg/kg) | Intra-day (n=3) | Inter-day RSD/% (n=9) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Day 1 | Day 2 | Day 3 | ||||||||
Recovery/% | RSD/% | Recovery/% | RSD/% | Recovery/% | RSD/% | |||||
RS-Pyr | 0.25 | 108.1 | 8.3 | 99.4 | 4.7 | 109.8 | 2.1 | 5.3 | ||
5 | 108.8 | 3.3 | 106.4 | 1.1 | 109.6 | 0.9 | 1.5 | |||
100 | 108.6 | 2.8 | 102.5 | 2.0 | 97.3 | 3.9 | 5.5 | |||
SS-Pyr | 0.25 | 106.4 | 5.0 | 103.2 | 7.8 | 98.7 | 2.4 | 3.8 | ||
5 | 101.5 | 3.4 | 106.1 | 0.7 | 99.6 | 2.6 | 3.3 | |||
100 | 103.5 | 2.6 | 98.6 | 1.9 | 93.1 | 7.7 | 5.3 | |||
RR-Pyr | 0.25 | 97.0 | 7.1 | 97.2 | 6.1 | 102.7 | 3.6 | 3.3 | ||
5 | 105.0 | 7.4 | 110.3 | 2.0 | 110.6 | 1.3 | 2.9 | |||
100 | 105.0 | 2.1 | 100.4 | 1.2 | 96.6 | 7.8 | 4.2 | |||
SR-Pyr | 0.25 | 97.1 | 7.7 | 106.8 | 2.2 | 104.7 | 3.1 | 4.9 | ||
5 | 105.8 | 7.1 | 109.6 | 1.4 | 107.1 | 0.6 | 1.8 | |||
100 | 106.9 | 1.9 | 107.0 | 4.5 | 103.6 | 6.2 | 1.8 | |||
S-(Pyr+O) | 0.5 | 94.9 | 4.4 | 82.5 | 7.9 | 85.0 | 3.4 | 7.5 | ||
10 | 88.0 | 5.1 | 86.9 | 2.5 | 88.8 | 1.9 | 1.1 | |||
200 | 88.7 | 0.8 | 81.2 | 1.9 | 87.9 | 5.1 | 4.8 | |||
R-(Pyr+O) | 0.5 | 100.1 | 2.6 | 88.5 | 3.3 | 87.5 | 3.1 | 7.6 | ||
10 | 90.1 | 5.4 | 85.7 | 1.4 | 88.0 | 1.1 | 2.5 | |||
200 | 90.9 | 1.0 | 87.0 | 2.0 | 92.0 | 5.7 | 2.9 |
|
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||