Chinese Journal of Chromatography ›› 2023, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (4): 339-347.DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1123.2022.09002
• Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHU Weihong1,2, WANG Chao1,*(), ZHANG Linlin1, YUAN Mao1
Received:
2022-09-02
Online:
2023-04-08
Published:
2023-04-03
CLC Number:
ZHU Weihong, WANG Chao, ZHANG Linlin, YUAN Mao. Direct determination of five xanthic acids in water by ultra performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry[J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2023, 41(4): 339-347.
Compound | Parent ion (m/z) | Daughter ion (m/z) | DP/V | CE/eV | CXP/V |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ethyl xanthic acid (EXA) | 120.9 | 45.0* | -35 | -20 | -5 |
42.9 | -35 | -28 | -5 | ||
Isopropyl xanthic acid (i-PXA) | 134.9 | 59.0* | -35 | -16 | -7 |
57.1 | -35 | -28 | -5 | ||
Isobutyl xanthic acid (i-BXA) | 149.0 | 73.0* | -35 | -14 | -1 |
71.1 | -35 | -22 | -1 | ||
n-Butyl xanthic acid (n-BXA) | 148.9 | 71.0* | -25 | -20 | -1 |
72.7 | -25 | -12 | -1 | ||
Amyl xanthic acid (AXA) | 162.9 | 85.1* | -30 | -22 | -13 |
86.9 | -30 | -14 | -1 | ||
2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid-13C6 (2,4-DA-13C6) | 225.0 | 166.9* | -50 | -14 | -21 |
130.9 | -50 | -38 | -1 |
Table 1 MS parameters of the five xanthic acids and isotope internal standard
Compound | Parent ion (m/z) | Daughter ion (m/z) | DP/V | CE/eV | CXP/V |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ethyl xanthic acid (EXA) | 120.9 | 45.0* | -35 | -20 | -5 |
42.9 | -35 | -28 | -5 | ||
Isopropyl xanthic acid (i-PXA) | 134.9 | 59.0* | -35 | -16 | -7 |
57.1 | -35 | -28 | -5 | ||
Isobutyl xanthic acid (i-BXA) | 149.0 | 73.0* | -35 | -14 | -1 |
71.1 | -35 | -22 | -1 | ||
n-Butyl xanthic acid (n-BXA) | 148.9 | 71.0* | -25 | -20 | -1 |
72.7 | -25 | -12 | -1 | ||
Amyl xanthic acid (AXA) | 162.9 | 85.1* | -30 | -22 | -13 |
86.9 | -30 | -14 | -1 | ||
2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid-13C6 (2,4-DA-13C6) | 225.0 | 166.9* | -50 | -14 | -21 |
130.9 | -50 | -38 | -1 |
Compound | R | MDL/ (μg/L) | Intra-day RSD/% | Inter-day RSD/% | 1.00 μg/L | 20.0 μg/L | 80.0 μg/L | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recovery/% | RSD/% | Recovery/% | RSD/% | Recovery/% | RSD/% | ||||||||||
EXA | 0.9998 | 0.04 | 1.6 | 4.1 | 127 | 2.5 | 100 | 1.0 | 104 | 1.5 | |||||
i-PXA | 0.9999 | 0.03 | 2.0 | 3.3 | 96.9 | 3.0 | 107 | 1.6 | 110 | 1.3 | |||||
i-BXA | 1.0000 | 0.04 | 1.4 | 3.5 | 102 | 2.9 | 104 | 0.4 | 106 | 1.1 | |||||
n-BXA | 0.9999 | 0.03 | 2.1 | 3.6 | 111 | 2.9 | 103 | 1.9 | 108 | 1.6 | |||||
AXA | 0.9996 | 0.03 | 1.3 | 4.1 | 133 | 2.1 | 107 | 1.4 | 112 | 0.4 |
Table 2 Linear correlation coefficients (R), method detection limits (MDLs), intra- and inter-day RSDs (n=7) and spiked recoveries (n=6) for the five xanthic acids
Compound | R | MDL/ (μg/L) | Intra-day RSD/% | Inter-day RSD/% | 1.00 μg/L | 20.0 μg/L | 80.0 μg/L | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recovery/% | RSD/% | Recovery/% | RSD/% | Recovery/% | RSD/% | ||||||||||
EXA | 0.9998 | 0.04 | 1.6 | 4.1 | 127 | 2.5 | 100 | 1.0 | 104 | 1.5 | |||||
i-PXA | 0.9999 | 0.03 | 2.0 | 3.3 | 96.9 | 3.0 | 107 | 1.6 | 110 | 1.3 | |||||
i-BXA | 1.0000 | 0.04 | 1.4 | 3.5 | 102 | 2.9 | 104 | 0.4 | 106 | 1.1 | |||||
n-BXA | 0.9999 | 0.03 | 2.1 | 3.6 | 111 | 2.9 | 103 | 1.9 | 108 | 1.6 | |||||
AXA | 0.9996 | 0.03 | 1.3 | 4.1 | 133 | 2.1 | 107 | 1.4 | 112 | 0.4 |
Source | Method | Sample volume/mL | Xanthic acid | Distinguish isomers or not | MDL/ (μg/L) | Storage condition |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Standard | SP[ | 500 | BXA | no | 2 | pH 5-6 |
UVSP[ | NA | BXA | no | 4 | pH 7, ca. 4 ℃, 3 d | |
P&T-GC-MS[ | 5 | BXA | no | 0.04 | pH 10, ca. 4 ℃, 1 d | |
LC-MS[ | 1 | BXA | no | 0.2 | pH 9-10, ≤4 ℃, 2 d | |
Research paper | HS-GC[ | 10 | BXA | no | 0.24 | -4 ℃, 2 d |
HS-SPME-GC-MS[ | 10 | BXA | no | 0.02 | pH 10, refrigeration, 1 d | |
LC[ | NA | BXA | no | 0.8 | pH 9-10 | |
LC-MS[ | NA | BXA | no | 0.08 | NA | |
LC-MS[ | NA | AXA | no | 0.114 | pH 9-10, 4 ℃, ≤1 d | |
This study | HPLC-MS | 2 | EXA, i-PXA, i-BXA, | yes | 0.03-0.04 | pH 11, 4 ℃, 8 d |
n-BXA, AXA |
Table 3 Comparison of the methods for analysis of xanthic acids
Source | Method | Sample volume/mL | Xanthic acid | Distinguish isomers or not | MDL/ (μg/L) | Storage condition |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Standard | SP[ | 500 | BXA | no | 2 | pH 5-6 |
UVSP[ | NA | BXA | no | 4 | pH 7, ca. 4 ℃, 3 d | |
P&T-GC-MS[ | 5 | BXA | no | 0.04 | pH 10, ca. 4 ℃, 1 d | |
LC-MS[ | 1 | BXA | no | 0.2 | pH 9-10, ≤4 ℃, 2 d | |
Research paper | HS-GC[ | 10 | BXA | no | 0.24 | -4 ℃, 2 d |
HS-SPME-GC-MS[ | 10 | BXA | no | 0.02 | pH 10, refrigeration, 1 d | |
LC[ | NA | BXA | no | 0.8 | pH 9-10 | |
LC-MS[ | NA | BXA | no | 0.08 | NA | |
LC-MS[ | NA | AXA | no | 0.114 | pH 9-10, 4 ℃, ≤1 d | |
This study | HPLC-MS | 2 | EXA, i-PXA, i-BXA, | yes | 0.03-0.04 | pH 11, 4 ℃, 8 d |
n-BXA, AXA |
Compound | Background/ (μg/L) | Spiked level/ (μg/L) | Surface water | Ground water | Industrial sewage | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recovery/% | RSD/% | Recovery/% | RSD/% | Recovery/% | RSD/% | |||||
EXA | ND | 1.00 | 98.2 | 6.6 | 100 | 3.1 | 79.7 | 3.0 | ||
20.0 | 85.2 | 2.1 | 87.0 | 1.5 | 49.1 | 2.8 | ||||
80.0 | 88.5 | 1.7 | 92.6 | 1.4 | 46.1 | 3.2 | ||||
i-PXA | ND | 1.00 | 88.3 | 6.9 | 84.7 | 3.6 | 52.2 | 6.3 | ||
20.0 | 111 | 1.6 | 112 | 2.0 | 74.8 | 4.3 | ||||
80.0 | 113 | 0.8 | 114 | 1.8 | 78.6 | 2.3 | ||||
i-BXA | ND | 1.00 | 80.3 | 7.7 | 85.4 | 2.3 | 97.9 | 3.5 | ||
20.0 | 102 | 1.9 | 96.7 | 2.3 | 108 | 4.3 | ||||
80.0 | 105 | 1.4 | 105 | 1.6 | 117 | 1.3 | ||||
n-BXA | ND | 1.00 | 103 | 7.0 | 93.0 | 3.5 | 124 | 5.3 | ||
20.0 | 123 | 4.1 | 108 | 2.0 | 124 | 2.6 | ||||
80.0 | 129 | 2.3 | 113 | 1.2 | 126 | 2.5 | ||||
AXA | ND | 1.00 | 101 | 7.2 | 106 | 1.7 | 127 | 3.3 | ||
20.0 | 94.8 | 3.2 | 90.8 | 1.3 | 98.0 | 2.9 | ||||
80.0 | 103 | 2.0 | 98.1 | 0.9 | 93.6 | 3.0 |
Table 4 Recoveries and RSDs of the five xanthic acids in three kinds of water samples (n=6)
Compound | Background/ (μg/L) | Spiked level/ (μg/L) | Surface water | Ground water | Industrial sewage | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recovery/% | RSD/% | Recovery/% | RSD/% | Recovery/% | RSD/% | |||||
EXA | ND | 1.00 | 98.2 | 6.6 | 100 | 3.1 | 79.7 | 3.0 | ||
20.0 | 85.2 | 2.1 | 87.0 | 1.5 | 49.1 | 2.8 | ||||
80.0 | 88.5 | 1.7 | 92.6 | 1.4 | 46.1 | 3.2 | ||||
i-PXA | ND | 1.00 | 88.3 | 6.9 | 84.7 | 3.6 | 52.2 | 6.3 | ||
20.0 | 111 | 1.6 | 112 | 2.0 | 74.8 | 4.3 | ||||
80.0 | 113 | 0.8 | 114 | 1.8 | 78.6 | 2.3 | ||||
i-BXA | ND | 1.00 | 80.3 | 7.7 | 85.4 | 2.3 | 97.9 | 3.5 | ||
20.0 | 102 | 1.9 | 96.7 | 2.3 | 108 | 4.3 | ||||
80.0 | 105 | 1.4 | 105 | 1.6 | 117 | 1.3 | ||||
n-BXA | ND | 1.00 | 103 | 7.0 | 93.0 | 3.5 | 124 | 5.3 | ||
20.0 | 123 | 4.1 | 108 | 2.0 | 124 | 2.6 | ||||
80.0 | 129 | 2.3 | 113 | 1.2 | 126 | 2.5 | ||||
AXA | ND | 1.00 | 101 | 7.2 | 106 | 1.7 | 127 | 3.3 | ||
20.0 | 94.8 | 3.2 | 90.8 | 1.3 | 98.0 | 2.9 | ||||
80.0 | 103 | 2.0 | 98.1 | 0.9 | 93.6 | 3.0 |
|
Viewed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Full text 111
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract 214
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||