Chinese Journal of Chromatography ›› 2024, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (3): 264-274.DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1123.2023.05012
• Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
WANG Pan, MA Jiping*(), LI Shuang, CHENG Jiawen, HUANG Chaonan
Received:
2023-05-29
Online:
2024-03-08
Published:
2024-03-19
Supported by:
CLC Number:
WANG Pan, MA Jiping, LI Shuang, CHENG Jiawen, HUANG Chaonan. Determination of four phenolic endocrine-disrupting chemicals in water by dispersive solid-phase extraction-ultra performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry based on metal-organic skeleton porous carbon materials[J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2024, 42(3): 264-274.
Analyte | Structure | Molecular mass/(g/mol) | pKa | log Kow |
---|---|---|---|---|
Bisphenol A (BPA) | ![]() | 228.29 | 9.73 | 3.43 |
4-tert-Octylphenol (4-t-OP) | ![]() | 206.32 | 10.20 | 4.93 |
4-Nonylphenol (4-NP) | ![]() | 220.35 | 10.30 | 5.76 |
Nonylphenol (NP) | ![]() | 220.35 | 10.25 | 5.71 |
Table 1 Structures and properties of the four phenolic endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs)
Analyte | Structure | Molecular mass/(g/mol) | pKa | log Kow |
---|---|---|---|---|
Bisphenol A (BPA) | ![]() | 228.29 | 9.73 | 3.43 |
4-tert-Octylphenol (4-t-OP) | ![]() | 206.32 | 10.20 | 4.93 |
4-Nonylphenol (4-NP) | ![]() | 220.35 | 10.30 | 5.76 |
Nonylphenol (NP) | ![]() | 220.35 | 10.25 | 5.71 |
Analyte | tR/ min | Precursor ion (m/z) | Product ions (m/z) | DPs/ V | CEs/ eV |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
BPA | 5.85 | 226.9 | 212.0*, 132.9 | -82, -87 | -27, -41 |
4-t-OP | 6.85 | 205.1 | 132.8*, 147.1 | -101, -101 | -27, -27 |
4-NP | 7.29 | 219.0 | 105.7*, 118.0 | -90, -103 | -27, -26 |
NP | 7.95 | 219.0 | 133.0*, 146.9 | -83, -89 | -41, -37 |
Table 2 MS parameters of the four phenolic EDCs
Analyte | tR/ min | Precursor ion (m/z) | Product ions (m/z) | DPs/ V | CEs/ eV |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
BPA | 5.85 | 226.9 | 212.0*, 132.9 | -82, -87 | -27, -41 |
4-t-OP | 6.85 | 205.1 | 132.8*, 147.1 | -101, -101 | -27, -27 |
4-NP | 7.29 | 219.0 | 105.7*, 118.0 | -90, -103 | -27, -26 |
NP | 7.95 | 219.0 | 133.0*, 146.9 | -83, -89 | -41, -37 |
Fig. 3 (a) FT-IR spectra, (b) X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns, (c) N2 adsorption-desorption isothermal curves of UiO-66 and UiO-66-C and (d) Zeta potentials of UiO-66-C
Material | Specific surface area/(m2/g) | Pore volume/ (cm3/g) | Pore size/ nm |
---|---|---|---|
UiO-66 | 671.64 | 0.36 | 2.18 |
UiO-66-C | 127.87 | 0.17 | 5.26 |
Table 3 Specific surface areas, pore volumes, pore sizes of UiO-66 and UiO-66-C
Material | Specific surface area/(m2/g) | Pore volume/ (cm3/g) | Pore size/ nm |
---|---|---|---|
UiO-66 | 671.64 | 0.36 | 2.18 |
UiO-66-C | 127.87 | 0.17 | 5.26 |
Fig. 4 Effects of (a) UiO-66-C dosage, (b) pH of water sample, (c) adsorption time, (d) elutent, (e) elution volume, (f) elution time and (g) mass fraction of NaCl on the recoveries of the four phenolic EDCs (n=3)
Analyte | Linear equation | r2 | Linear range/(μg/L) | LOD/(μg/L) | LOQ/(μg/L) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
BPA | y=9755.5x+2848.2 | 0.9991 | 0.5-100 | 0.01 | 0.03 |
4-t-OP | y=2120.4x+259.7 | 0.9998 | 0.5-100 | 0.09 | 0.31 |
4-NP | y=1473.5x-511.3 | 0.9996 | 0.5-100 | 0.13 | 0.42 |
NP | y=10970.0x-2877.1 | 0.9998 | 0.5-100 | 0.04 | 0.14 |
Table 4 Linear equations, correlation coefficients (r2), linear ranges, LODs and LOQs of the four phenolic EDCs
Analyte | Linear equation | r2 | Linear range/(μg/L) | LOD/(μg/L) | LOQ/(μg/L) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
BPA | y=9755.5x+2848.2 | 0.9991 | 0.5-100 | 0.01 | 0.03 |
4-t-OP | y=2120.4x+259.7 | 0.9998 | 0.5-100 | 0.09 | 0.31 |
4-NP | y=1473.5x-511.3 | 0.9996 | 0.5-100 | 0.13 | 0.42 |
NP | y=10970.0x-2877.1 | 0.9998 | 0.5-100 | 0.04 | 0.14 |
Analyte | Spiked level/ (μg/L) | Recovery/ % | Intra-day RSD/% | Inter-day RSD/% |
---|---|---|---|---|
BPA | 1 | 84.4 | 8.4 | 9.9 |
10 | 98.0 | 10.6 | 11.9 | |
50 | 106.8 | 3.7 | 12.6 | |
4-t-OP | 1 | 102.0 | 9.9 | 8.2 |
10 | 99.1 | 1.5 | 6.1 | |
50 | 90.8 | 4.5 | 10.3 | |
4-NP | 1 | 90.9 | 7.2 | 7.8 |
10 | 97.0 | 8.3 | 6.6 | |
50 | 97.4 | 8.3 | 6.8 | |
NP | 1 | 114.2 | 3.2 | 13.2 |
10 | 91.1 | 8.7 | 8.0 | |
50 | 107.2 | 3.3 | 7.0 |
Table 5 Spiked recoveries, intra- and inter-day RSDs of the four phenolic EDCs (n=6)
Analyte | Spiked level/ (μg/L) | Recovery/ % | Intra-day RSD/% | Inter-day RSD/% |
---|---|---|---|---|
BPA | 1 | 84.4 | 8.4 | 9.9 |
10 | 98.0 | 10.6 | 11.9 | |
50 | 106.8 | 3.7 | 12.6 | |
4-t-OP | 1 | 102.0 | 9.9 | 8.2 |
10 | 99.1 | 1.5 | 6.1 | |
50 | 90.8 | 4.5 | 10.3 | |
4-NP | 1 | 90.9 | 7.2 | 7.8 |
10 | 97.0 | 8.3 | 6.6 | |
50 | 97.4 | 8.3 | 6.8 | |
NP | 1 | 114.2 | 3.2 | 13.2 |
10 | 91.1 | 8.7 | 8.0 | |
50 | 107.2 | 3.3 | 7.0 |
Analysis method | Sample pretreatment materials | Matrices | Pretreatment time/min | LOD/ (μg/L) | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPE-UPLC-MS/MS | amino-functionalized grooved | river and lake water | 15.0 | 0.01 | [ |
polyacrylonitrile nanofiber mat | |||||
molecular imprinted polymer | serum and urine | >60.0 | 0.01-0.04 | [ | |
Oasis HLB column | wastewater | >50.0 | 0.002-0.02 | [ | |
NAX and C18 mixed packing of column | tap water and effluent water | >200.0 | 0.00181-0.00332 | [ | |
ENVI ChromP column | surface water | >120.0 | 0.05-0.10 | [ | |
DSPE-UPLC-MS/MS | UiO-66-C | tap water and surface water | 10.5 | 0.01-0.13 | this work |
Table 6 Comparison of this method with the reported methods
Analysis method | Sample pretreatment materials | Matrices | Pretreatment time/min | LOD/ (μg/L) | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPE-UPLC-MS/MS | amino-functionalized grooved | river and lake water | 15.0 | 0.01 | [ |
polyacrylonitrile nanofiber mat | |||||
molecular imprinted polymer | serum and urine | >60.0 | 0.01-0.04 | [ | |
Oasis HLB column | wastewater | >50.0 | 0.002-0.02 | [ | |
NAX and C18 mixed packing of column | tap water and effluent water | >200.0 | 0.00181-0.00332 | [ | |
ENVI ChromP column | surface water | >120.0 | 0.05-0.10 | [ | |
DSPE-UPLC-MS/MS | UiO-66-C | tap water and surface water | 10.5 | 0.01-0.13 | this work |
Analyte | Spiked level/ (μg/L) | Tap water | Surface water | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Found/(μg/L) | Recovery (RSD)/% | Found/(μg/L) | Recovery (RSD)/% | |||
BPA | 0 | ND | / | ND | / | |
1 | 0.85 | 85.3 (10.7) | 0.88 | 88.2 (7.5) | ||
10 | 10.19 | 101.9 (6.4) | 10.29 | 102.9 (14.5) | ||
50 | 53.64 | 107.3 (5.6) | 48.10 | 96.2 (4.7) | ||
4-t-OP | 0 | ND | / | ND | / | |
1 | 0.77 | 77.1 (3.9) | 1.07 | 107.0 (9.1) | ||
10 | 7.84 | 78.4 (5.5) | 10.53 | 105.3 (8.3) | ||
50 | 41.92 | 83.8 (3.5) | 53.21 | 106.4 (5.6) | ||
4-NP | 0 | ND | / | 1.38 | / | |
1 | 1.11 | 111.3 (2.2) | 1.11 | 111.1 (8.0) | ||
10 | 9.78 | 97.8 (4.2) | 9.85 | 98.5 (7.7) | ||
50 | 53.42 | 106.8 (5.0) | 56.47 | 112.9 (8.7) | ||
NP | 0 | ND | / | 0.26 | / | |
1 | 1.03 | 103.6 (9.1) | 1.16 | 116.6 (2.2) | ||
10 | 8.59 | 85.9 (5.3) | 9.07 | 90.7 (9.5) | ||
50 | 46.96 | 93.9 (5.4) | 48.25 | 96.5 (7.3) |
Table 7 Analysis results of the four phenolic EDCs in tap water and surface water samples (n=3)
Analyte | Spiked level/ (μg/L) | Tap water | Surface water | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Found/(μg/L) | Recovery (RSD)/% | Found/(μg/L) | Recovery (RSD)/% | |||
BPA | 0 | ND | / | ND | / | |
1 | 0.85 | 85.3 (10.7) | 0.88 | 88.2 (7.5) | ||
10 | 10.19 | 101.9 (6.4) | 10.29 | 102.9 (14.5) | ||
50 | 53.64 | 107.3 (5.6) | 48.10 | 96.2 (4.7) | ||
4-t-OP | 0 | ND | / | ND | / | |
1 | 0.77 | 77.1 (3.9) | 1.07 | 107.0 (9.1) | ||
10 | 7.84 | 78.4 (5.5) | 10.53 | 105.3 (8.3) | ||
50 | 41.92 | 83.8 (3.5) | 53.21 | 106.4 (5.6) | ||
4-NP | 0 | ND | / | 1.38 | / | |
1 | 1.11 | 111.3 (2.2) | 1.11 | 111.1 (8.0) | ||
10 | 9.78 | 97.8 (4.2) | 9.85 | 98.5 (7.7) | ||
50 | 53.42 | 106.8 (5.0) | 56.47 | 112.9 (8.7) | ||
NP | 0 | ND | / | 0.26 | / | |
1 | 1.03 | 103.6 (9.1) | 1.16 | 116.6 (2.2) | ||
10 | 8.59 | 85.9 (5.3) | 9.07 | 90.7 (9.5) | ||
50 | 46.96 | 93.9 (5.4) | 48.25 | 96.5 (7.3) |
|
Viewed | ||||||
Full text 121
|
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||