Chinese Journal of Chromatography ›› 2024, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (3): 256-263.DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1123.2023.07006
• Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
HE Hongmei*(), XU Lingying, ZHANG Changpeng, FANG Nan, JIANG Jinhua, WANG Xiangyun, YU Jianzhong, ZHAO Xueping
Received:
2023-07-20
Online:
2024-03-08
Published:
2024-03-19
Supported by:
CLC Number:
HE Hongmei, XU Lingying, ZHANG Changpeng, FANG Nan, JIANG Jinhua, WANG Xiangyun, YU Jianzhong, ZHAO Xueping. Determination of three new herbicide residues in soil, sediment and water by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry[J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2024, 42(3): 256-263.
Sample | pH | Organic matter/ (g/kg) | Cation exchange content/ (mmol/kg) | Soil texture |
---|---|---|---|---|
Red soil | 4.42 | 13.0 | 8.76 | sandy loam soil |
Paddy soil | 5.97 | 28.5 | 17.7 | sandy loam soil |
Black soil | 6.17 | 32.2 | 21.8 | silt loam |
Fluvo-aquic soil | 8.72 | 9.5 | 8.68 | sandy loam soil |
Sediment 1 | 6.89 | 79.4 | 27.51 | heavy loam soil |
Sediment 2 | 7.15 | 9.6 | 8.49 | light loam soil |
Table 1 Properties of soil and sediment samples
Sample | pH | Organic matter/ (g/kg) | Cation exchange content/ (mmol/kg) | Soil texture |
---|---|---|---|---|
Red soil | 4.42 | 13.0 | 8.76 | sandy loam soil |
Paddy soil | 5.97 | 28.5 | 17.7 | sandy loam soil |
Black soil | 6.17 | 32.2 | 21.8 | silt loam |
Fluvo-aquic soil | 8.72 | 9.5 | 8.68 | sandy loam soil |
Sediment 1 | 6.89 | 79.4 | 27.51 | heavy loam soil |
Sediment 2 | 7.15 | 9.6 | 8.49 | light loam soil |
Compound | Retention time/min | Ion pairs (m/z) | Collision energies/eV |
---|---|---|---|
Isoxaflutole (ISO) | 2.42 | 360.0/250.9*, 360.0/219.9 | 14, 40 |
Metazachlor (MET) | 2.43 | 278.0/210.0, 278.0/134.1* | 10, 22 |
Saflufenacil (SAF) | 2.60 | 501.1/349.0, 501.1/198.0* | 20, 38 |
Table 2 Retention times and MS parameters for the three herbicides
Compound | Retention time/min | Ion pairs (m/z) | Collision energies/eV |
---|---|---|---|
Isoxaflutole (ISO) | 2.42 | 360.0/250.9*, 360.0/219.9 | 14, 40 |
Metazachlor (MET) | 2.43 | 278.0/210.0, 278.0/134.1* | 10, 22 |
Saflufenacil (SAF) | 2.60 | 501.1/349.0, 501.1/198.0* | 20, 38 |
Matrix | Spiked level/ (mg/kg) | MET | ISO | SAF | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recovery/% | RSD/% | Recovery/% | RSD/% | Recovery/% | RSD/% | ||||
Red soil | 0.005 | 88.9 | 3.1 | 94.7 | 5.5 | 97.5 | 6.5 | ||
0.1 | 95.8 | 6.1 | 95.6 | 8.5 | 94.9 | 7.9 | |||
2.0 | 91.7 | 3.8 | 88.8 | 5.7 | 81.8 | 5.9 | |||
Fluvo-aquic soil | 0.005 | 90.6 | 4.1 | 96.6 | 4.5 | 96.0 | 8.3 | ||
0.1 | 98.7 | 1.2 | 99.8 | 3.2 | 104.0 | 1.9 | |||
2.0 | 96.5 | 7.7 | 98.5 | 8.1 | 92.7 | 11.5 | |||
Paddy soil | 0.005 | 87.2 | 2.5 | 91.2 | 4.5 | 88.3 | 4.0 | ||
0.1 | 94.3 | 0.4 | 101.9 | 1.6 | 95.5 | 2.5 | |||
2.0 | 95.9 | 3.0 | 95.4 | 3.5 | 91.2 | 3.4 | |||
Black soil | 0.005 | 88.5 | 3.4 | 93.4 | 3.2 | 94.9 | 3.6 | ||
0.1 | 98.5 | 2.1 | 100.1 | 1.4 | 101.9 | 1.8 | |||
2.0 | 91.6 | 4.3 | 89.8 | 2.9 | 82.9 | 3.2 | |||
Sediment 1 | 0.005 | 95.4 | 3.3 | 90.6 | 4.1 | 89.8 | 4.2 | ||
0.1 | 102.4 | 4.0 | 91.9 | 2.5 | 97.8 | 1.5 | |||
2.0 | 91.1 | 4.8 | 89.1 | 2.6 | 91.6 | 5.7 | |||
Sediment 2 | 0.005 | 90.6 | 1.7 | 77.2 | 8.2 | 93.4 | 2.8 | ||
0.1 | 102.0 | 3.5 | 84.8 | 12.8 | 103.4 | 3.3 | |||
2.0 | 101.2 | 4.4 | 88.7 | 5.4 | 102.6 | 7.6 | |||
Water | 0.005 | 77.9 | 5.7 | 79.6 | 4.6 | 80.8 | 6.0 | ||
0.1 | 91.3 | 1.9 | 92.1 | 3.9 | 93.8 | 3.0 | |||
2.0 | 105.1 | 2.8 | 101.6 | 2.8 | 107.1 | 1.8 |
Table 3 Spiked recoveries and relative standard deviations (RSDs) for the three herbicides in soil, sediment and water samples (n=6)
Matrix | Spiked level/ (mg/kg) | MET | ISO | SAF | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recovery/% | RSD/% | Recovery/% | RSD/% | Recovery/% | RSD/% | ||||
Red soil | 0.005 | 88.9 | 3.1 | 94.7 | 5.5 | 97.5 | 6.5 | ||
0.1 | 95.8 | 6.1 | 95.6 | 8.5 | 94.9 | 7.9 | |||
2.0 | 91.7 | 3.8 | 88.8 | 5.7 | 81.8 | 5.9 | |||
Fluvo-aquic soil | 0.005 | 90.6 | 4.1 | 96.6 | 4.5 | 96.0 | 8.3 | ||
0.1 | 98.7 | 1.2 | 99.8 | 3.2 | 104.0 | 1.9 | |||
2.0 | 96.5 | 7.7 | 98.5 | 8.1 | 92.7 | 11.5 | |||
Paddy soil | 0.005 | 87.2 | 2.5 | 91.2 | 4.5 | 88.3 | 4.0 | ||
0.1 | 94.3 | 0.4 | 101.9 | 1.6 | 95.5 | 2.5 | |||
2.0 | 95.9 | 3.0 | 95.4 | 3.5 | 91.2 | 3.4 | |||
Black soil | 0.005 | 88.5 | 3.4 | 93.4 | 3.2 | 94.9 | 3.6 | ||
0.1 | 98.5 | 2.1 | 100.1 | 1.4 | 101.9 | 1.8 | |||
2.0 | 91.6 | 4.3 | 89.8 | 2.9 | 82.9 | 3.2 | |||
Sediment 1 | 0.005 | 95.4 | 3.3 | 90.6 | 4.1 | 89.8 | 4.2 | ||
0.1 | 102.4 | 4.0 | 91.9 | 2.5 | 97.8 | 1.5 | |||
2.0 | 91.1 | 4.8 | 89.1 | 2.6 | 91.6 | 5.7 | |||
Sediment 2 | 0.005 | 90.6 | 1.7 | 77.2 | 8.2 | 93.4 | 2.8 | ||
0.1 | 102.0 | 3.5 | 84.8 | 12.8 | 103.4 | 3.3 | |||
2.0 | 101.2 | 4.4 | 88.7 | 5.4 | 102.6 | 7.6 | |||
Water | 0.005 | 77.9 | 5.7 | 79.6 | 4.6 | 80.8 | 6.0 | ||
0.1 | 91.3 | 1.9 | 92.1 | 3.9 | 93.8 | 3.0 | |||
2.0 | 105.1 | 2.8 | 101.6 | 2.8 | 107.1 | 1.8 |
Ref. | Analyte | Pretreatment | Detection method | Matrix effects/% | Recoveries/% | LOQ/(mg/kg) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
[ | ISO | QuEChERS | LC-MS/MS (ESI-) | -28.78 | -48.78 | 72.9 | -116.5 | 0.005 |
[ | ISO | SPE | HPLC | / | 85 | -104 | 0.1 | |
[ | ISO | SPE | HPLC | / | 75 | -105 | 0.1 | |
[ | MET | liquid-liquid distribution | HPLC | / | 90.3 | -99.0 | 0.1 | |
[ | MET | unpurified | GC | / | 90.35 | -106.24 | 0.05 | |
[ | MET | SPE (water) | LC-MS/MS (ESI+) | -94 | -198 | 60 | 0.0002 | |
unpurified (sediment) | 118 | 0.0001 | ||||||
[ | MET | QuEChERS | LC-MS/MS (ESI+) | -7.3 | 86.5 | -99.3 | 0.005 | |
[ | SAF | SPE | LC-MS/MS (ESI+) | -23.5 | -21.5 | 88.9 | -110.3 | 0.006 |
This method | ISO | SPE | LC-MS/MS (ESI+) | -5.5 | -13.6 | 77.2 | -101.9 | 0.0002 |
MET | -10.1 | -2.0 | 77.9 | -105.1 | 0.00005 | |||
SAF | -5.7 | -16.5 | 80.8 | -107.1 | 0.00005 |
Table 4 Comparison between this method and existing methods
Ref. | Analyte | Pretreatment | Detection method | Matrix effects/% | Recoveries/% | LOQ/(mg/kg) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
[ | ISO | QuEChERS | LC-MS/MS (ESI-) | -28.78 | -48.78 | 72.9 | -116.5 | 0.005 |
[ | ISO | SPE | HPLC | / | 85 | -104 | 0.1 | |
[ | ISO | SPE | HPLC | / | 75 | -105 | 0.1 | |
[ | MET | liquid-liquid distribution | HPLC | / | 90.3 | -99.0 | 0.1 | |
[ | MET | unpurified | GC | / | 90.35 | -106.24 | 0.05 | |
[ | MET | SPE (water) | LC-MS/MS (ESI+) | -94 | -198 | 60 | 0.0002 | |
unpurified (sediment) | 118 | 0.0001 | ||||||
[ | MET | QuEChERS | LC-MS/MS (ESI+) | -7.3 | 86.5 | -99.3 | 0.005 | |
[ | SAF | SPE | LC-MS/MS (ESI+) | -23.5 | -21.5 | 88.9 | -110.3 | 0.006 |
This method | ISO | SPE | LC-MS/MS (ESI+) | -5.5 | -13.6 | 77.2 | -101.9 | 0.0002 |
MET | -10.1 | -2.0 | 77.9 | -105.1 | 0.00005 | |||
SAF | -5.7 | -16.5 | 80.8 | -107.1 | 0.00005 |
|
[1] | LI Yanan, LIU Xiaoyan, WANG Yan, LIU Zhen, YE Mingliang, WANG Hailin. Deciphering cellular processes responding to lethality of 17β-estradiol by quantitative phosphoproteomics [J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2024, 42(4): 333-344. |
[2] | YANG Chao, LIU Jinglong, XU Xiaojian, WU Lijuan, YIN Mingming, DAI Wei, HAN Qian. Determination of nine aromatic amines in water by cloud point extraction-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry [J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2024, 42(3): 296-303. |
[3] | WANG Pan, MA Jiping, LI Shuang, CHENG Jiawen, HUANG Chaonan. Determination of four phenolic endocrine-disrupting chemicals in water by dispersive solid-phase extraction-ultra performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry based on metal-organic skeleton porous carbon materials [J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2024, 42(3): 264-274. |
[4] | ZHANG Mingye, CAO Yan, LI Xiang, KOU Jing, XU Qitong, YANG Sijie, ZHENG Zhiyi, LIU Jun, MEI Surong. Exposure characteristics and health risk assessment of 97 typical chemical pollutants in human serum [J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2024, 42(2): 217-223. |
[5] | LEI Jiacheng, ZHENG Huangrong, LIU Lu, LI Weixia. Simultaneous determination of six nitroaromatic compounds and three anions in environmental matrices using a liquid chromatography-ion chromatography coupled system [J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2024, 42(1): 92-98. |
[6] | WANG Junxia, XU Sijie, SUN Yueying, LEI Huihui, CHENG Yuanyuan, WANG Xuedong, ZHANG Zhan’en. Matrix solid-phase dispersion extraction of organophosphorus flame retardants in soil based on response surface methodology [J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2024, 42(1): 64-74. |
[7] | SUN Huijing, ZHANG Beibei, CUI Dongni, DONG Bingjie, WANG Hui, HU Guanjiu. Determination of 145 pharmaceuticals and personal care products in eleven categories in water by ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-triple quadrupole mass spectrometry [J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2024, 42(1): 24-37. |
[8] | GU Shuqing, CHEN Niannian, ZENG Jing, PENG Xiaoyu, ZHANG Min, GAO Yu, PAN Lina, GE Cheng, LI Wei, YI Xionghai, GUO Dehua, DENG Xiaojun. Identifying animal-derived components in camel milk and its products by ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry [J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2024, 42(1): 13-23. |
[9] | DU Jie, SUN Pengchao, ZHANG Menglu, LIAN Zete, YUAN Fenggang, WANG Gang. Preparation of porous boron nitride-doped polypyrrole-2,3,3-trimethylindole solid-phase microextraction coating for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon detection [J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2023, 41(9): 789-798. |
[10] | QU Jian, NI Yuwen, YU Haoran, TIAN Hongxu, WANG Longxing, CHEN Jiping. New pretreatment method for detecting petroleum hydrocarbons in soil: silica-gel dehydration and cyclohexane extraction [J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2023, 41(9): 814-820. |
[11] | WANG Qiuxu, FENG Qiyan, ZHU Xueqiang. Determination of bisphenols in sediment by accelerated solvent extraction and solid-phase extraction purification coupled with ultra performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry [J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2023, 41(7): 582-590. |
[12] | XIA Baolin, WANG Shitao, YIN Jingjing, ZHANG Weiyi, YANG Na, LIU Qiang, WU Haijing. Simultaneous determination of 43 antibacterials from nine categories in water using automatic sample loading-solid phase extraction-ultra performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry [J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2023, 41(7): 591-601. |
[13] | CHEN Dongyang, ZHANG Hao, ZHANG Lei, WANG Yihong, WANG Xiaodan, FENG Jiali, LIANG Jing, ZHONG Xuan. Determination of kojic acid in fermented foods by solid-phase extraction coupled with ultra performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry [J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2023, 41(7): 632-639. |
[14] | GAO Yiyang, DING Yali, CHEN Luyu, DU Fang, XIN Xubo, FENG Juanjuan, SUN Mingxia, FENG Yang, SUN Min. Recent application advances of covalent organic frameworks for solid-phase extraction [J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2023, 41(7): 545-553. |
[15] | NING Xiaopan, YAO Qian, XU Zhongxiang, YIN Yao, LIU Han, ZHANG Xiaoyan, DING Tao, ZHANG Yong, HOU Yu, WANG Mengru, WU Lina, TANG Qiting. Determination of seven paraben preservatives in aquatic seasoning using solid-phase extraction coupled with high performance liquid chromatography [J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2023, 41(6): 513-519. |
Viewed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Full text 175
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract 207
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||