Chinese Journal of Chromatography ›› 2023, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (8): 690-697.DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1123.2023.03018
• Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
QIAN Zhengming1,2, WU Mengqi2, TAN Guoying2, JIN Liling2, LI Ning3,*(), XIE Juying1,*(
)
Received:
2023-03-28
Online:
2023-08-08
Published:
2023-08-03
Contact:
LI Ning, XIE Juying
Supported by:
CLC Number:
QIAN Zhengming, WU Mengqi, TAN Guoying, JIN Liling, LI Ning, XIE Juying. Rapid determination of aesculin and aesculetin in Fraxini Cortex by high performance liquid chromatography-ultraviolet at equal absorption wavelength[J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2023, 41(8): 690-697.
Fig. 1 Effects of different extraction conditions on the contents of aesculin and aesculetin a. volume percentage of ethanol in aqueous solution; b. ratio of sample weight (g) to extraction solvent volume (mL); c. extraction time; d. extraction temperature.
Compound | Linear range/(μmol/L) | Linear equation | r | LOD/(μmol/L) | LOQ/(μmol/L) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aesculin | 14.8-443.8 | Y=2.7820X+1.1814 | 1.0000 | 1.5 | 3.0 |
Aesculetin | 14.8-444.6 | Y=2.7499X+1.7877 | 1.0000 | 1.5 | 3.0 |
Table 1 Linear ranges, linear equations, correlation coefficients (r), limits of detection (LODs) and limits of quantification (LOQs) of aesculin and aesculetin
Compound | Linear range/(μmol/L) | Linear equation | r | LOD/(μmol/L) | LOQ/(μmol/L) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aesculin | 14.8-443.8 | Y=2.7820X+1.1814 | 1.0000 | 1.5 | 3.0 |
Aesculetin | 14.8-444.6 | Y=2.7499X+1.7877 | 1.0000 | 1.5 | 3.0 |
No. | Aesculin (ESM) | Aesculetin | |
---|---|---|---|
ESM | EAW | ||
S1 | 1.22 | 0.11 | 0.11 |
S2 | 2.11 | 0.19 | 0.19 |
S3 | 1.86 | 0.22 | 0.22 |
S4 | 2.14 | 0.37 | 0.37 |
S5 | 0.77 | 1.48 | 1.47 |
S6 | 0.83 | 0.23 | 0.22 |
S7 | 2.80 | 0.12 | 0.11 |
S8 | 0.68 | 0.33 | 0.33 |
S9 | 0.41 | 0.40 | 0.40 |
S10 | 0.26 | 0.11 | 0.11 |
Table 2 Contents of aesculin and aesculetin in Fraxini Cortex samples %
No. | Aesculin (ESM) | Aesculetin | |
---|---|---|---|
ESM | EAW | ||
S1 | 1.22 | 0.11 | 0.11 |
S2 | 2.11 | 0.19 | 0.19 |
S3 | 1.86 | 0.22 | 0.22 |
S4 | 2.14 | 0.37 | 0.37 |
S5 | 0.77 | 1.48 | 1.47 |
S6 | 0.83 | 0.23 | 0.22 |
S7 | 2.80 | 0.12 | 0.11 |
S8 | 0.68 | 0.33 | 0.33 |
S9 | 0.41 | 0.40 | 0.40 |
S10 | 0.26 | 0.11 | 0.11 |
No. | Sample extraction | HPLC separation | Harmful solvent | Number of reference compound | Ref. | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Method | Solvent | Time/min | Mobile phase | Time/min | |||||
1 | RE | 50 mL methanol | 60 | 20 mL acetonitrile-0.1% (v/v) phosphoric acid aqueous solution | 20 | 50.0 mL methanol and 1.6 mL acetonitrile | 2 | [ | |
2 | UE | 24 mL 94% (v/v) methanol aqueous solution | 8.5 | 50.4 mL methanol-0.1% (v/v) formic acid aqueous solution | 63 | 42.6 mL methanol | 2 | [ | |
3 | RE | 50 mL methanol | 60 | 60 mL acetonitrile-0.1% (v/v) phosphoric acid aqueous solution | 60 | 50.0 mL methanol and 7.2 mL acetonitrile | 2 | [ | |
4 | UE | 10 mL synthesized DES containing 20% (v/v) water | 30 | 12.5 mL methanol-0.1% (v/v) formic acid aqueous solution | 25 | 3.8 mL methanol | 2 | [ | |
5 | UE | 10 mL 25% (v/v) ethanol aqueous solution | 5 | 8.25 mL acetonitrile-0.1% (v/v) formic acid aqueous solution | 5.5 | 0.5 mL acetonitrile | 1 | this method |
Table 3 Comparison of this method with methods in literature reports
No. | Sample extraction | HPLC separation | Harmful solvent | Number of reference compound | Ref. | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Method | Solvent | Time/min | Mobile phase | Time/min | |||||
1 | RE | 50 mL methanol | 60 | 20 mL acetonitrile-0.1% (v/v) phosphoric acid aqueous solution | 20 | 50.0 mL methanol and 1.6 mL acetonitrile | 2 | [ | |
2 | UE | 24 mL 94% (v/v) methanol aqueous solution | 8.5 | 50.4 mL methanol-0.1% (v/v) formic acid aqueous solution | 63 | 42.6 mL methanol | 2 | [ | |
3 | RE | 50 mL methanol | 60 | 60 mL acetonitrile-0.1% (v/v) phosphoric acid aqueous solution | 60 | 50.0 mL methanol and 7.2 mL acetonitrile | 2 | [ | |
4 | UE | 10 mL synthesized DES containing 20% (v/v) water | 30 | 12.5 mL methanol-0.1% (v/v) formic acid aqueous solution | 25 | 3.8 mL methanol | 2 | [ | |
5 | UE | 10 mL 25% (v/v) ethanol aqueous solution | 5 | 8.25 mL acetonitrile-0.1% (v/v) formic acid aqueous solution | 5.5 | 0.5 mL acetonitrile | 1 | this method |
|
Viewed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Full text 473
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract 259
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||