Chinese Journal of Chromatography ›› 2025, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (4): 317-325.DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1123.2024.10003
• Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
FENG Zhuangzhuang, LIN Xiao, BAO Dejun, HU Xiaojian, ZHANG Haijing, ZHU Ying*(), ZHANG Xu*(
)
Received:
2024-10-09
Online:
2025-04-08
Published:
2025-03-26
Supported by:
CLC Number:
FENG Zhuangzhuang, LIN Xiao, BAO Dejun, HU Xiaojian, ZHANG Haijing, ZHU Ying, ZHANG Xu. Determination of four oxidative stress biomarkers in human urine using solid-phase extraction coupled with ultra performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry[J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2025, 43(4): 317-325.
Compound | Retention time/min | Parent ion (m/z) | Daughter ions (m/z) | Cone voltages/V | Collision voltages/V |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
diY | 2.94 | 361.2 | 254.1/315.1* | +25/+25 | +22/+15 |
8-OHdG | 3.48 | 284.1 | 140.0/168.0* | +18/+18 | +30/+12 |
8-OHG | 3.29 | 300.1 | 140.1/168.1* | +15/+15 | +30/+15 |
HNEMA | 5.45 | 318.4 | 162.0/171.1*/189.0 | -18/-18/-18 | -10/-20/-12 |
13C12-diY | 2.94 | 373.3 | 266.2/327.3 | +20/+20 | +25/+15 |
13C-15N2-8-OHdG | 3.48 | 287.1 | 171.1 | +20 | +15 |
13C-15N2-8-OHG | 3.29 | 303.1 | 171.1 | +20 | +15 |
D3-HNEMA | 5.42 | 321.1 | 165.1/189.1 | -20/-20 | -13/-13 |
Table 1 MS parameters of the four target compounds and their stable isotope internal standards
Compound | Retention time/min | Parent ion (m/z) | Daughter ions (m/z) | Cone voltages/V | Collision voltages/V |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
diY | 2.94 | 361.2 | 254.1/315.1* | +25/+25 | +22/+15 |
8-OHdG | 3.48 | 284.1 | 140.0/168.0* | +18/+18 | +30/+12 |
8-OHG | 3.29 | 300.1 | 140.1/168.1* | +15/+15 | +30/+15 |
HNEMA | 5.45 | 318.4 | 162.0/171.1*/189.0 | -18/-18/-18 | -10/-20/-12 |
13C12-diY | 2.94 | 373.3 | 266.2/327.3 | +20/+20 | +25/+15 |
13C-15N2-8-OHdG | 3.48 | 287.1 | 171.1 | +20 | +15 |
13C-15N2-8-OHG | 3.29 | 303.1 | 171.1 | +20 | +15 |
D3-HNEMA | 5.42 | 321.1 | 165.1/189.1 | -20/-20 | -13/-13 |
Fig. 4 Matrix effects of the four target analytes in different urine samples a. not adjusted with isotopic internal standard; b. adjusted with isotopic internal standard.
Compound | Linear range/ (μg/L) | r | LOD/ (μg/L) | LOQ/ (μg/L) |
---|---|---|---|---|
diY | 0.01-100 | 0.9999 | 0.018 | 0.060 |
8-OHDG | 0.01-100 | 0.9999 | 0.011 | 0.037 |
8-OHG | 0.01-100 | 0.9998 | 0.010 | 0.034 |
HNEMA | 0.01-100 | 0.9999 | 0.007 | 0.022 |
Table 2 Linear ranges, correlation coefficients (r), limits of detection (LODs) and limits of quantification (LOQs) of the four target compounds
Compound | Linear range/ (μg/L) | r | LOD/ (μg/L) | LOQ/ (μg/L) |
---|---|---|---|---|
diY | 0.01-100 | 0.9999 | 0.018 | 0.060 |
8-OHDG | 0.01-100 | 0.9999 | 0.011 | 0.037 |
8-OHG | 0.01-100 | 0.9998 | 0.010 | 0.034 |
HNEMA | 0.01-100 | 0.9999 | 0.007 | 0.022 |
Compound | Low | Medium | High | Intra-day RSD/% | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recovery/% | RSD/% | Recovery/% | RSD/% | Recovery/% | RSD/% | ||||
diY | 100.2 | 1.4 | 97.8 | 0.8 | 97.2 | 0.9 | 1.7 | ||
8-OHdG | 105.6 | 1.4 | 104.9 | 1.4 | 103.0 | 0.8 | 1.6 | ||
8-OHG | 104.2 | 0.7 | 100.9 | 0.9 | 100.8 | 1.1 | 1.8 | ||
HNEMA | 106.0 | 4.1 | 102.0 | 4.5 | 96.9 | 2.2 | 5.2 |
Table 3 Recoveries and relative standard deviations (RSDs) of intra-day at low, medium and high levels of the four target compounds (n=6)
Compound | Low | Medium | High | Intra-day RSD/% | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recovery/% | RSD/% | Recovery/% | RSD/% | Recovery/% | RSD/% | ||||
diY | 100.2 | 1.4 | 97.8 | 0.8 | 97.2 | 0.9 | 1.7 | ||
8-OHdG | 105.6 | 1.4 | 104.9 | 1.4 | 103.0 | 0.8 | 1.6 | ||
8-OHG | 104.2 | 0.7 | 100.9 | 0.9 | 100.8 | 1.1 | 1.8 | ||
HNEMA | 106.0 | 4.1 | 102.0 | 4.5 | 96.9 | 2.2 | 5.2 |
No. | Oxidative stress biomarker | n | Extraction method | Instrumental analysis method | LOD/ (μg/L) | Sample volume/μL | Ref. | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DNA | RNA | Lipid | Protein | |||||||
1 | √ | √ | / | √ | 3 | / | HPLC-MS/MS | 0.058-0.093 | / | [ |
2 | √ | / | √ | √ | 7 | derivatization-SPE | HPLC-MS/MS | 0.01-0.03 | 500 | [ |
3 | √ | / | / | √ | 4 | dilution | UPLC-MS/MS | 0.007-0.083 | 50 | [ |
4 | √ | / | √ | / | 4 | SPE | HPLC-MS/MS | 0.008-0.03 | 100 | [ |
5 | √ | √ | / | / | 2 | SPE | UPLC-MS/MS | / | 200 | [ |
6 | √ | / | √ | / | 2 | SPE | UPLC-MS/MS | 0.01-0.02 | 500 | [ |
7 | √ | √ | √ | √ | 4 | SPE | UPLC-MS/MS | 0.007-0.018 | 200 | this study |
Table 4 Comparison of the developed method with other reported methods for the determination of oxidative stress biomarkers in human urine
No. | Oxidative stress biomarker | n | Extraction method | Instrumental analysis method | LOD/ (μg/L) | Sample volume/μL | Ref. | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DNA | RNA | Lipid | Protein | |||||||
1 | √ | √ | / | √ | 3 | / | HPLC-MS/MS | 0.058-0.093 | / | [ |
2 | √ | / | √ | √ | 7 | derivatization-SPE | HPLC-MS/MS | 0.01-0.03 | 500 | [ |
3 | √ | / | / | √ | 4 | dilution | UPLC-MS/MS | 0.007-0.083 | 50 | [ |
4 | √ | / | √ | / | 4 | SPE | HPLC-MS/MS | 0.008-0.03 | 100 | [ |
5 | √ | √ | / | / | 2 | SPE | UPLC-MS/MS | / | 200 | [ |
6 | √ | / | √ | / | 2 | SPE | UPLC-MS/MS | 0.01-0.02 | 500 | [ |
7 | √ | √ | √ | √ | 4 | SPE | UPLC-MS/MS | 0.007-0.018 | 200 | this study |
|
Viewed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Full text 144
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract 200
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||